gastrointerstinal stromal tumor (gist) recent advances and differential diagnosis
TRANSCRIPT
GIST recent advances and Differential diagnosis
Dr. Indira Shastry.K Kasturba medical college
Manipal university, Manipal.
History
• Golden and Stout in 1941: described the mesenchymal tumors arising in bowel as tumors arising from smooth muscle cells; leiomyoblastoma, leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma.
• Term GIST was 1st used by Mazur and Clark in 1983.
• In 1998 Japanese research workers (Hirota et al) discovered KIT mutations in GIST that possibly distinguish GIST from other tumors.
Definition & Terminology
• GI tract associated stromal (mesenchymal) neoplasm with activating mutations in c-KIT (CD117) or PDGFR A, whose line of differentiation recapitulates the interstitial cells of cajal and has broad spectrum of biological behaviour.
• Stromal / mesenchymal tumors of GIT can be divided in to : • Those identical to tumors arising from soft tissue in rest of the
body : Leiomyoma, Leiomyosarcoma, Neural tumors, hemangiomas, fibromas, myofibroblastic tumors.
• Stromal tumors : GIST
Malignant Benign
Epidemiology &Incidence
• Age : 60-80 yrs / familial (<30yrs) • Gender: M=F. • Most common benign non-
epithelial tumor of the GI tract. • 1% of primary GI cancers.
2.2% primary gastric cancers (SEER data).
• Oesophagus: 5%• Stomach: 50-70% • SI: 25-40%
• Duodenum – 10-20 %• Jejunum – 27-37%• Ileum : 27-53%
• Colorectal : 10% • Extra - gastrointestinal GIST
: 6.7% (AFIP)
Cell of origin c Cell of origin
• GIST, the specific KIT- or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRA)-signal driven mesenchymal tumor, arises from interstitial cells of cajal (ICC).
• ICC are KIT + fibroblast like cells located around the myenteric plexus and in the muscularis propria throughout the GI tract.
• ICC arise from precursor mesenchymal cells that ultra-structural and immunophenotypic features of both neuronal and smooth muscle differentiation (just like GIST) .
Kit positivity
Pathophysiology
1. C-kit,PDGFRA mutations- chromosome 4q11-21, Type III tyrosine kinase protein receptor
2. Loss of potential suppressor genes
Molecular biology
• C-KIT: (85-95%)• Exon 11 (mutations / In-frame deletions): most
common type 70%. GIST with missense point mutation at Exon 11 have better prognosis in Gastric but not in other sites.
• Exon 9 : 2nd most common , commonly associated with small bowel with known aggressive clinical behaviour.
• Exon 13: involve missense mutations and associated with more malignant potential.
Molecular biology
• PDGFR A:• close homologues to KIT. PDGFRA mutations seen in 5-7% cases. • Most PDGFRA mutant GIST are located in stomach with aggressive
behaviour. • Epithelioid morphology with weak / negative staining for CD117. • These tumors are usually resistant to imatinib treatment.
• Wild type: (IGFR 1 mutation)• 5-15 % of GIST do not harbour KIT / PDGFRA mutations• Can be positive for CD117, less responsive to imatinib.
Sites Oesophagus Stomach Duodenum Jejunum and ileum
Incidence 5% 50-70% 10-20% 27-37% and 27-53% respectively
Gender predilection
Males Males, in young females
M=F M=F
Site Lower 1/3rd or GE junction
Antrum followed by pylorus
2nd part of duodenum
-
Gross (size of tumor)
Usually >5cm in size (Miettinen et al)
Variable Usually >4.5 cm Variable
Morphology Spindled or epithelioid
MC-spindle (70%) Cellular, usually >2mitosis/50 hpf
Variable
Behaviour and prognosis
Aggressive •Good survival with complete resection. •73-81% behave in benign fashion.
•30-50% are malignant. •Presence of necrosis / epithelioid change lower the mitotic threshold for malignancy.
Worse outcome than gastric GIST
GIST in various sites Recent advances -21
Colon Appendix Ano-rectum Extragastrointerstinal GIST
Incidence 5% Very rare (only 4 cases reported till now )
5% 6.7%
Gender predilection
M=F - - -
Site Ascending and descending colon
- - Omentum, mesentry and retroperitonium
Gross (size of tumor)
Variable Variable Usually >5cm Omental GIST can be large with low mitosis
Morphology Heterogeneous but MC is spindle with fascicles, pallisiding or storiform pattern
•All 4 showed spindle morphology, 3 contained skeinoid fibers •Low mitosis (<1/50hpf)
Variable >5mitosis /50hpf
Variable
Behaviour and prognosis
Variable •Good prognosis. •Mets to liver and lung observed after 10-15 yrs
32-54% malignant Omental GIST resemble stomach GIST. Mesentric GIST resemble SI GIST
GIST
Spindle shaped (70%)
Sclerosing spindle shaped
Palisading vacuolated cell subtype
Hypercellular
Sarcomatous spindle shaped
Epithelioid (20%)
Slerosing
Dyscohesive
Hypercellular
Sarcomatous Mixed type
(10%)
Cellular spindle cell GIST
vacuolated spindle cell GIST
Sclerosing spindle cell GIST Pallisaded – vacuolated spindle cell
GIST
Sclerosing epithelioid varient Epitheliod GIST
Dyscohesive epithelioid GIST Bizarre tumor cells with giant forms
Skeinoid fibers
Amorphous Elongated PAS positive eosinophilic
aggregates of extracellular collagen
Heredity Mean Age M/F Associated Lesions Mutations GIST
Location Behaviour
Familial AD 45 M&FMast cell lesions, achalasia
GL KIT /PDGFRA
Small intestine
Frequently aggressive
Carney – stratakis AD 23 M&F Paragangliom
aGL SDH, No KIT / PDGFRA
Stomach epithelioid
GIST mets but protracted, Paragang. aggressive
Carney triad None <30 >95%FLung chondroma, paraganglioma
No KIT / PDGFRA or SDH
Stomach epithelioid
Mets (LN)but protracted course
NF 1 AD 40-50 M&F Neurofibromatosis
GL SDH, No KIT / PDGFRA
Small intestine spindled
As for usual
Sporadic SDHB deficient (pediatric type)
None <16, rarely also adults >90%F None
No KIT / PDGFRA or SDH
Stomach epithelioid
Mets but protracted course, may go to nodes
Sporadic multiple None 60 M&F None As for usual Usually
stomachMost are benign
GIST syndromes
IHC
• DOG 1 (discovered on GIST 1): 87-97.8%• CD117 up to 95%• Protein kinase C theta – 96% • Heavy caldesmon -80%• CD 34 -70% • Nestin – non specific (pos in schwannoma, leiomyosarcoma and melanoma) • Smooth muscle actin 20-30% • S100 – 5% ( 15-20% in SI GIST, more frequent in NF 1 associated GIST)• Desmin & CK – 1-2%• SDHB ( succinate dehydrogenase B) – loss of staining in syndromic or
paediatric GIST.
DOG1 (discovered on GIST1)
• Novel gene that encodes for protein called calcium regulated chloride channel protein. • In a study conducted by West et al immunoreactivity for DOG1 in
GIST samples was 97.8%. Espinosa et al showed 87% sensitivity and specificity. • DOG1 is highly expressed not only in typical GISTs but also in kit
mutation-negative GISTs. • 5% of GIST that do not react with CD117, DOG 1 would be essential
tool for more reliable diagnosis of GIST. • DOG 1 +ty also identified in subset of mesenchymal tumors –
leiomyomas and synovial sarcomas.
Mixed spindle cell and epithelioid CD117 negative DOG 1 Pos CD34 pos
Epithelioid GIST Heterogeneous
membranous positivity Cytoplasmic &
membraneous DOG 1 pos
West et al
CD 117
• CD117/KIT : +ve in >95% tumors but no longer considered absolute requirement.
• Other tumors show consistent positivity include: • Mastocytoma • Seminoma (membranous) • Lung small cell carcinoma • Extramedullary myleoid tumors.
• Other metastatic abdominal tumors that test positive for CD117 include • Metastatic melanoma • Clear cell sarcoma (30-50%)• Ewings sarcoma (50%)• Childhood neuroblastoma (30%)• Angiosarcoma (50%)• Poorly differentiated carcinomas
Protein Kinase C Theta (PKCT)
• Downstream effector in Kit signaling system involved in T cell activation, signal transduction and neuronal differentiation.
• Strongly over expressed in GIST but not in sarcomas • In study done by Kim et al 96% GIST was positive for PKCT were
as 98% cases were positive for CD117. • Some investigators believe PKCT signaling in weaker than KIT
hence it is less useful.
Mixed spindle cell and epithelioid PKCT pos
Grading (2003 WHO and 2012 Tan CB et al)
TNM staging
• The 7th ed of the international union against cancer (UICC) in 2010 published for the first time, a classification and staging system for GIST using the TNM system.
• AIM : uniform and standardized analysis of malignant tumors based on their stage of development and degree of spread.
• Joensuu et al (2011) concluded large tumor size, high mitotic count, non-gastric location, presence of rupture, and male sex were the independent prognostic factors for recurrent free survival.
The new TNM risk stratification system
Differential diagnosis
• Spindled bland GIST • Leiomyoma• Schwannoma• Fibromatosis• Sclerosing mesenteritis• Inflammatory fibroid polyp• Gastric plexiform fibromyxoma• Solitary fibrous tumor• Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor• Endometrial stromal sarcoma• Calcifying fibrous pseudotumor
• Spindled malignant GIST DDx• Leiomyosarcoma• Malignant fibrous
histiocytoma• Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
• Epithelioid GIST DDx• Poorly differentiated
carcinoma• Melanoma/clear cell sarcoma• Glomus tumor• Gangliocytic paraganglioma• GI endocrine carcinoma• Extramedullary myeloid
tumor• GI mucosal benign epithelioid
nerve sheath tumor
GI Leiomyoma GIST (spindled, bland)
Usually arises in muscularis mucosaeNearly always arises in muscularis propria
Cytoplasm usually distinct, eosinophilic
Cytoplasm frequently indistinct
CD117- negative CD117 - 74-95%
CD34- negative CD34 -70%
DOG1 -negative DOG1 -87-94%
Desmin -100%Desmin -1-2% overall but 20% in oesophagus
GI leiomyoma
Desmin pos CD 117 pos in stellate cells DOG 1 positive GI leiomyoma
Palisading is more accentuated in GIST; CD34 stains 0-33% of GI schwannomas
GI schwannoma GIST (spindled, bland)
Peripheral lymphoid cuff common Lacks lymphoid cuff
Frequent cell size variation Generally uniform cell size
No skeinoid fibers May have skeinoid fibers
S100 -100% S100 -5% (20% in small intestine)
GFAP - 65-100% GFAP - negative
CD117 -negative CD117 -74-95%
Fibromatosis (mesentric or retroperitonial and pelvic)
GIST
CD34 - negative CD34- 60-70% positive
CD117 -frequently negative, variable reports of focal/weak staining
CD117- 74-95% positive
DOG1 -negative DOG1- 87-94%Beta-catenin positive -90% (nuclear) Beta-catenin- negativeLow to moderate cellularity Moderate to high cellularityCytologically bland May be cytologically atypicalProminent thin walled dilated veins Lacks prominent veinsInfiltrative margin Usually circumscribed, pushing marginNo cystic degeneration or necrosis May have cystic degeneration or necrosis
Sclerosing Mesenteritis GIST (spindled, bland)
Lobulated paucicellular fibrosisNot typically lobulated, usually cellular rather than fibrotic
Prominent chronic inflammatory infiltrate
Inflammation not typical
Entrapped fat and fat necrosisLobules of entrapped fat and fat necrosis unusual
GIST Solitary fibrous tumor Spindled or epithelioid cytoplasm Scant cytoplasm
Skeinoid fibers: are irregular, globular and have prominent retraction
Ropy collagen
Hemangiopericytoma-like vessels uncommon
HPC-like vessels common
CD117 (KIT) 74-95%, DOG1 87-95% positive
CD117, DOG1 negative
Actin 30-50% positive Actin rare and focalCD34 is usually positive in both
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor
GIST
Usually in children Rare in children
Frequently associated with systemic signs and symptoms
Not associated with systemic signs and symptoms
Prominent inflammatory cells Usually only scattered inflammatory cells
Positive - desmin, keratin and ALK Desmin (1-2%), keratin and ALK – negative
CD117, DOG1, CD34 - negative CD117, DOG1, CD34- positive
Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (Metastatic)
GIST (spindled, bland)
History of prior hysterectomy No such history
May arise in endometriosis Not associated with endometriosis
Prominent spiral arterioles Hyalinized larger vessels
CD10, ER and PR - positive ER and PR negative
DOG1 - negative DOG1 87-94%
Calcifying fibrous pseudo tumor
GIST (spindled, bland)
Calcification frequently psammomatous
Calcification dystrophic, not psammomatous
Patchy chronic inflammation Inflammation not typical
May form multinodular mass Not typically multinodular
Prominent hyalinized stromaStroma occasionally sclerotic but not usually hyalinized
Spindled cytologicaly malignant GIST
GI leiomyosarco
ma
Dedifferentiated
liposarcoma
Malignant Fibrous
Histiocytoma
GIST (spindled,
cytologically malignant)
Frequently markedly pleomorphic
Frequently markedly pleomorphic
Markedly pleomorphicPleomorphism infrequent, even in malignant lesions
Frequently brightly eosinophilic cytoplasm
CD117, DOG1 negative
CD117, DOG1, CD34 - negative
CD117, DOG1, CD34 - positive
Epithelioid GIST
Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma
GIST
May have a mucosal component or form glands
No mucosal component or true glands
Frequently markedly pleomorphicPleomorphism infrequent, even in malignant lesions
Mucin stain may be positive No mucin
Keratin positive Keratin 1-2%
CD34 negative CD34 70%
DOG1 negative DOG1 87-94%%
Poorly differentiated carcinoma of duodenum positive for CD117
Negative for DOG 1 CK positive
GI mucosal benign
epithelial nerve sheeth
tumor
Extramedullary Myeloid
TumorGI Endocrine Carcinoma
Gangliocytic Paragangliom
aGlomus Tumor
GIST(epithelio
id)
Centered in lamina propria or submucosa
Frequent history of leukemia
Nuclei round and regular
Three cell types: epithelioid, ganglion, spindled
Nuclei round and regular
Nuclei usually oval or spindled
S100 positiveEosinophilic myelocytes frequently present
Stippled (salt and pepper) chromatin
Synaptophysin and chromogranin positive
Distinct cell borders
Cell borders may be indistinct
CD117 negativeInfiltration along collagen fibers
Keratin positive cells
Keratin positive epithelioid cells
Mitotic rate usually <1/50 HPF
Mitotic rate can be higher
CD34 negativeCD45, CD43, myeloperoxidase positive
Synaptophysin and chromogranin positive
CD117 negative CD117 negative CD117 74-95%
Restricted to colon
Extramedullary Myeloid Tumor CD117 negative Gangliocytic
ParagangliomaSmooth muscle actin positive
Smooth muscle actin frequently negative
References • Morson and Dawson’s GI pathology ; 5th ed. • Recent advances in histopathology ; 21 vol • Rosai and Akerman surgical pathology 10th ed • WHO pathology and genetics of tumors of digestive system. 2003. • Christopher B Tan et al ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review of Case Reports,
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions. International Scholarly Research Network gastroenterology. 2012.
• Novelli M et al. DOG1 and CD117 are the antibodies of choice in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology 2010, 57.
• Hadi MA et al. Evaluation of the Novel Monoclonal Antibody Against DOG1 as a Diagnostic Marker for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Journal of the Egyptian Nat. Cancer Inst. 2009, Vol. 21.
• Stanford university website.
Thank you