gaurav portfolio
DESCRIPTION
Design Portfolio Last updated August 2012TRANSCRIPT
Augmenting retail shopper experience through interaction design for non-prepackaged goods
Collaborators:Prof. Pradeep YammiyavarKanupriya
Bachelor Thesis ProjectAugust 2011-April 2012
1
Search Selection Packaging Payment
AIM
2
User’s perspective:To design an improved transaction experience for making buying of non-prepackaged goods in retail environment hassle free and enhance shoppingexperiences in terms of usability vectors (Effective, Efficient, Error free, Easyand Enjoyable)
Retailers perspective:Decreasing transaction time per customer thereby increasing footfalls
KEY ASPECTS
3
• Present systems not aimed at non-prepackaged goods.
• Customers are less compliant with technology.
• Trusts play major role in establishing loyalty towards a particular store.
• Purchasing becoming more of a once-a-week affair, rather than frequentvisits to the neighborhood.
• Customers like to see and feel the product on shop shelf and makecomparisons with other products before making a purchase.
FIELD STUDY
4
FIELD STUDY
5
10 stores; divided into four categories, Hypermarts, Superstores, Departmental Shops, and Grocery Shops.
Interviewed Customers, Store owners, employees and managers
Observed Footfalls, Transaction times per customer, Information Channels for customers, Technologies and Techniques employed by retailers
PROBLEM ANALYSIS
6
Type I Type II Type III Type IVOrganized Retail Single Store Players
Big Bazaar, Vishal Reliance Fresh, Easy Day, HUB Departmental Stores Grocery Stores
ProblemsTransaction Time Yes Yes Yes YesPilferage Yes Yes No NoTrolley Yes Yes No NoSpace for movement Yes Yes Partially RarelyStocks get wrongly placed Yes Yes No NoInventory Tracking Yes Yes Partially No
OthersQueues, Customer
service gets effected, Increased Pilferage
Queues, Customer service gets effected
Multiple Billings, Monetary Change, More manpower
required during rush hours
Simultaneous multiple calculations,
Monetary Change
ACTIVITY DIAGRAM
7
INFERENCES
8
• Want to pick items themselves
• Prefer buying items having standard price or quantity
• Shopping is more of a family affair
• More information is desired for making purchase decisions
• Change in outlook regarding mobiles, credit cards and e-banking
• Less space for movement due to number of trolleys during rush hours
• Stocks getting wrongly placed and pilferage were main concern areas for retailers
DESIGN ATTRIBUTES
9
• To reduce transaction time
• To promote freedom of choice as per Indian consumer habits
• To reduce manual effort in packaging of non-standard quantity and contents
• To discourage shop-lifting and prevent pilferage
• To integrate everyday transaction process with technology
• To provide customers with information such as price, quality, etc. and aid purchase decisions
SYSTEM CONCEPTS
10
Final System Cycle
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
11
Exits
Security Check
Billing
Shopping Activity
Takes Trolley/Basket
Enters
Prepackaged Non Prepackaged
Device for customer
Counter Machine
Self take away counter
Shelf tags and Sectional Counters
Hand Device• Payment• Weight measurement• Item recognition• Shopping assistance
Floor Infrastructure• Shelf tags• Sectional counters• Counter machine• Take away Zone
HAND DEVICE: Conceptualization
12
HAND DEVICE: Form Explorations
13
HAND DEVICE: 3D Renderings
14
DESIGN SOLUTION I & II
• Easy integration with payment and other store components
• Hands free option/ Flexibility• Operational within the store
perimeter 15
Velcro/RubberBand
WeighingMechanism
TagReader
Screen
WeighingMechanism
Support formobile device
Grip
• Greater scope of integration with mobile devices
• Flexibility for shoppers• Ergonomic grip
DESIGN SOLUTION III
16
• Secure transaction: Only after confirmation from the user, items go in the basket• Flexibility: Hand device can be rotated to be viewed from any angle• Raised periphery: Prevents goods from rolling/ falling outside and helps in easy stacking
RotatingPlatform
RaisedPeriphery
Hand DeviceDock
WeighingPlatform
HAND DEVICE: Interface Design
17
HAND DEVICE: Interface Design
18
FLOOR INFRASTRUCTURE
19
Counter machineFor weight >4 kg user could use these machines to weigh the selected items.
Master Controller in small storescould have charging points for the
hand device
Takeaway Zoneuse hand device
as a key to unlock the box and take
the items
DELIVERABLES: 3D Environment
20
• Hand Device is given• Prepackaged section: scanning of tags• Non-prepackaged section: weighing of goods• Counter machine: for heavy items• Sectional counters: basket handover• Master controllers: for payment• Takeaway zone: Use device as key after payment
DELIVERABLES: Prototypes
21
Mockups Demonstration
22
TRANSACTION TIME
Old Layout
New Layout
New LayoutOld Layout
23
TRANSACTION TIME
24
KEY ADVANTAGESTransaction time reduced• Non-prepackaged section: Removing label printing scale as customers are weighingtheir goods themselves• Reducing queue waiting time at billing counter: list is already prepared, eliminatingscanning of items
Customer effort• Customer does not have to carry the goods from one section to another• Providing complete information through the device
Freedom of choice• Customer can edit/remove items from his list through device• Can shop with fixed amount or quantity• Add the bill to customers’ account (khata system)
Security aspects• Inventory Tracking• Alarm system to ensure device cannot be taken outside the store• Purchased items can be taken with the device as key only when the payment is received
JUNOS SPACE UX TOOLKITA UX GUIDELINE AND RESOURCE LIBRARY FOR DEVELOPERS
Mentors:Mr. Pradeep Joseph, Design ManagerMs. Rashmi Singh, Interaction Designer
Summer InternshipMay 2011-July 2011
1
NEED
2
• Design and development of a web based toolkit to accompany the existingplatform Junos Space. It was designed to guide the developers, and helpensure that the applications follow essential UX guidelines and areconsistent.
• The existing style guide had concentrate information and was goodenough for internal developers but for outside developer communitiesdetailed guidelines were needed so as to have consistent applications onthe platform across the globe.
3
UX TOOLKIT
Interface Design
Formulating Guidelines
PARALLEL PROCESSES
4
Extensive study of the PlatformStudying the existing style guideMaking a comprehensive list of all the components of the applicationsIdentifying and documenting consistencies
BACKGROUND
5
Documentation reviewed by a group of designers, developers and projectmanagers.Reviews gathered and updated via three stage iteration of guidelines.Finally tested with developers and designers.
UX GUIDELINES
INTERFACE DESIGN: Sketches
6
INTERFACE DESIGN: Sketches
7
INTERFACE DESIGN: Card Sorting
8
Card sorting was done to categorize all the documented components.The session involved 3 designers, 2 developers and a project manager.
INTERFACE DESIGN: Initial IA
9The Initial IA was formulated to kickstart the Interface design of the toolkit.
INTERFACE DESIGN: Wireframes
10
INTERFACE DESIGN: Concept UIs
11
FINAL PRODUCT
12
Gaurav was involved in the initial brainstorming, conceptualization,prototyping and final implementation of the tool kit. Gaurav exhibitedexcellent skills of professionalism throughout his internship tenure. He wentthe extra mile to complete the work on time and has left a positiveimpression on the team as a whole.
-Mr. Pradeep JosephUX Design ManagerJuniper Networks
RECOMMENDATION
13
PICK CHOOSE EXPERIENCEAn Apparel Store Installation
Collaborators:Asst. Prof. Keyur SorathiaKanupriyaParesh Joshi
Interactive Communication ProjectJanuary 2011-April 2011
1
OBJECTIVES
2
• Identify the key technological trends driving change in apparel retailing.• Creating a flexible in-store environment through design installation,
ensuring that each visit will feel like a brand new experience.• Empower customers by providing them with interactive tools needed to
make an informed purchase decision.
BACKGROUND STUDY
3
MIND MAP
4
KEY ASPECTS
5
Retail experience
customer-centric
approach
dynamic use of space
unparalleled experience
simplicity and ease of use
likeminded products and services into
retail environments
assistive technologies
INITIAL IDEAS
6
FINAL CONCEPT
7
INSTALLATION MODEL
8
PROTYPING
9
Arduino Circuit Flash Interface
INSTALLATION
10
Design of a Board Game for 4-8 year olds (classes Kg–I/II) that can be incorporated in the school curriculum to make learning a fun activity
Guide:Prof. Ravi Mokashi Punekar
Design ProjectAugust 2010-November 2010
1
NEED
2
• Learning through Board Games in children is very important at in earlyeducation stage to equip them with adaptive learning, built their strategicmind and to create a spirit of winning.
• There are lots of educational board games, but there are virtually no onesfor children of such smaller age groups where they can perform the basictasks and acquire primary knowledge.
• It is important not only to provide primary education and awareness to thechild but also to induce an environment for social interaction.
KEY ASPECTS
3
Child Development• Stages of intellectual development• Language Development• Play and Development stages
Gameplay• Learnability• Understandability• Colorful• Result oriented
Syllabus• Mostly Oral education• A-Z Words• Addition/Subtraction• Tables till 10
USER CENTRED ANALYSIS
4
• Field Trips to Primary and Pre-primary Schools
• Analysis of existing board games; pros and cons
• Understanding users’ mental model
INITIAL IDEAS
5
FINAL CONCEPT- Scrapbook Stars
6
Basic Gameplay-•To perform simple mathematical operations with the two dice.
•Then picking up the same colored card from the card decks
•Then identifying (KG Classes) or spelling (Classes I/II) the object drawn on the card.
STRENGTHS
7
• Requires no rehearsal or learnability• Surprise element is always present• The teacher or instructor can use only those set of cards that are taught in
the class, from the given universal set.• Covers the basic preparatory coursework
PROTOTYPING
8
USER TESTING
9
GaMa i- Garbage Management InnovationsHospital Waste Disposal System
Collaborators:Prof. Matti Hamalainen, Research Manager, Aalto Design Factory, FinlandProf. Jayanta Chatterjee, Head, Industrial & Management Engg. IIT KanpurSiddhart Bathla (IIT Kanpur)Paridhi Khaitan (ITM Gurgaon)Aditi Dhamija (NID Bangalore)
USID GURUKUL 2010August 2010-September 2010
1
SITUATION
2
THE UNSTRUCTURED SITUATIONthe medical chaoxity
chaoxity = chaos + complexity
STRUCTURE
3PATI
ENTS
PRO
VISI
ON
SPR
OCE
DU
RES
STRUCTURE
4PATI
ENTS
PRO
VISI
ON
SPR
OCE
DU
RES
5
SOLUTION
6
The Solution is known, but its hardly implemented.There is a comprehensive law since 2nd June year 2000.
segregatesegregatesegregate
at origin
at storage
at disposal
SEGREGATION
7
THE REAL PROBLEM: Waste
8
The problem is
not imaginary
SERVICE DESIGN THINKING
9
Garbage Management Innovations
GAMMA I
10
Color coded bins with visual ‘do’ & ‘don'ts’ – visual factory
Periodic of ward boys , sweepers and paramedics
Segregation campaign using TQM and Kaizen methods
SERVICE DESIGN THINKING
IMPLEMENTATION MODEL
11
Develop outsourced local autoclaves and digesters- Distributed by GamaI
Develop low cost shredding and compacting solutions
Develop alternative business models & revenue stream
IN HOUSE AUTOCLAVING
12
AWARENESS PRESENTATIONS
13