gavril giurgiu, carnegie mellon 1 b s mixing at cdf seminar at fermi national accelerator laboratory...
TRANSCRIPT
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
1
Bs Mixing at CDF
Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Gavril Giurgiu
Carnegie Mellon University
August 16, 2005
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
2
Outline• Introduction• B mixing phenomenology• CDF detector and B Physics triggers• B mixing analysis overview
– semileptonic and hadronic Bs signals
– decay time
– Bs lifetime
– flavor tagging– B0 mixing and tagging calibration
– Bs semileptonic and hadronic amplitude scans
• Conclusions and outlook
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
3
Introduction In the Standard Model, the charged current interactions of quarks are described by the Lagrangean:
The weak eigenstates d’, s’ and b’ are linear combinations of the mass eigenstates d, s and b and the quark mixing is given by the CKM matrix:
The Standard Model does not predict the values of CKM elements.We have to measure them.
B0 and Bs oscillations provide information on Vtd and Vts
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
4
B Mixing PhenomenologyNeutral B system:
Mass eigenstates:
Oscillation frequency of Bq mesons given by mq = MH - ML
Width (lifetime) difference HL
Neglecting , mixing probability after time t is give by:
Asymmetry:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
5
B Mixing Phenomenology (cont)
Although md is well measured (0.502 0.007 ps-1) determination of Vtd is affected by ~20% error due to large uncertainties on different parameters
In the ratio between md and ms
many common parameters cancel
B0/Bs oscillations are described by top quark exchange box diagrams mq and Vtq (q=d,s) are related by known parameters
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
6
Unitarity Triangle
Knowledge of both Bd and Bs mixing frequencies would provide better constraints on one side of unitarity triangle:
In the complex plane, the unitarity relation is represented by a triangle
Re
Im
B → J/ψ Ks
b → u decays
B0/Bs mixing
The CKM matrix is unitary:
One of the six unitarity relations:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
7
Current Bs StatusBs mixing not observed yetBs oscillates more than 30 times faster than Bd experimental challengeAt 95% C.L. lower limit ms > 14.4 ps-1 with sensitivity of 17.8 ps-1
CKM triangle global fit:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
8
CDF Detector
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
9
CDF Detector – Schematic View
Plug Calorimeter
1.3 < || < 3.5
Central Tracker (COT)
|| < 1.0 dE/dx for PID
Time of Flight for K/p separationplaced before 1.4 Tesla Solenoid
Electromagnetic andHadronic calorimeters
Silicon Detector
|| < 2.0
Muon Detectors
|| < 1.0
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
10
B Physics at the Tevatron
The b cross section is 103 times larger than
at the e+e- machines
Bs mesons are only produced at Tevatron
The total inelastic cross section is about 60 mb while the b production cross section in the central region is:
b, |y|<0.6b
Need triggers to select the b events
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
11
Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) Silicon Vertex Trigger is designed to select b events
- Implemented at Level 2- Uses silicon detector information and beamline position to
determine the track impact parameter
- Good impact parameter resolution ~ 47 m:
~33 m beam size ~30 m intrinsic SVT resolution
- Trigger on displaced track
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
12
SVT Triggers for B PhysicsSemileptonic (partially reconstructed) decays: Bs lepton Ds X - large number of events - decay time resolution degraded due to missing neutrino - triggered by 4 GeV lepton and displaced track with impact parameter |d0|>120 m and |d0|<1 mm
Hadronic (fully reconstructed) decays:
Bs Ds - smaller number of events - good decay time resolution - triggered by two displaced tracks with impact parameter |d0|>120 m and |d0|<1 mm
d0
d0d0
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
13
Mixing Analysis OverviewMixing analysis ingredients: - Signal reconstruction - Decay time - B flavor at decay - B flavor at production inferred through flavor tagging: - lepton tags - jet charge tags
Statistical significance of ms measurement:
Tagging
Signal Reconstruction
Decay time resolution
Sig
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
14
Semileptonic Bs SignalsMissing neutrino cannot see Bs mass peakUse Ds mass peak and (lepton, Ds) charge correlation:
l+D- - right sign combination
l-D- - wrong sign combination
Decay modes:
Ds ( 4355 94 ) Ds K*K ( 1750 83 )
Ds 3 ( 1573 88 )
Total of 7000 Bs candidates but ~18% come from “Physics backgrounds”
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
15
Semileptonic Bs Signals (cont)
Ds K*K ( 1750 83 ) Ds 3 ( 1573 88 )
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
16
Physics BackgroundsOriginates from real B decays:
B0/+ Ds D (~13%)Bs Ds (~2%) (D / / D(s) lepton X)Bs Ds D(s) (~3%)
In each case we observe the same decay signature as in Bs Ds lepton
The decay time distributions and the reconstruction efficiencies are obtained from MC
Each decay time distribution is weighted in the maximum likelihood fit using the measured branching fractions and reconstruction efficiencies
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
17
Hadronic Bs SignalsAll final state particles reconstructed observe Bs mass peak
Decay modes:
Ds ( 526 33 ) Ds K*K ( 254 21 )
Ds 3 ( 116 18 )
Total of 900 Bs candidates
Satellite peak:
Bs Ds* (Ds* Ds X)
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
18
Hadronic Bs Signals (cont)Ds K*K ( 254 21 )
Ds 3 ( 116 18 )
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
19
Decay Time Decay time:
In semileptonic modes missing neutrino is statistically corrected by:
Hadronic decays do not need momentum correction
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
20
To resolve the fast Bs oscillations we need excellent decay time resolution
Hadronic decays Semileptonic decays (fully reconstructed): (partially reconstructed):
Decay Time Resolution
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
21
Decay Time BiasBecause: (1) In both hadronic and semileptonic decays the triggers require displaced tracks (2) Bs events are selected based on decay distance cuts the Bs decay time distribution is biased
Efficiency as function of decay time obtained from Monte Carlo:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
22
Lifetime MeasurementAs a cross check of analysis framework measure Bs lifetimeLifetime fit projections in both hadronic and semileptonic modes
Semileptonic: c(Bs) = 443 10 (stat) xxx (syst) m
Hadronic: c(Bs) = 479 29 (stat) 5 (syst) m
Good agreement with PDG 2004: c(Bs) = 438 17 m
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
23
Flavor TaggingFor Bs mixing analysis at CDF we used 5 opposite side flavor taggers Tag inferred from opposite side B in event: - muon and electron tag (semileptonic decay of opposite B) - three jet charge tag types:
- displaced vertex- displaced tracks- high pT
Tagging power given by D2 where is the tagging efficiency and
D = 1 – 2 Pmistag is the tagging dilution
Pmistag – mistag probability
Large dilution (D) means high tagging power
Knowledge of the dilution dependence on different quantities enhances tagging power
Trigger B meson
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
24
Lepton IdentificationCombine different quantities in a global likelihood function which gives the probability that a lepton is realExample: for muon identification we use five quantities:
3 matching variables between extrapolated track and muon stub (X, , Z)
2 calorimeter variables (electromagnetic and hadronic energies)Obtain real muon templates from J/ψ→ and fake muon templates from →p where the proton matches to a muon stubX: Hadronic energy: Likelihood:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
25
Lepton TaggingWe use an inclusive lepton-SVT sample to determine the dilution of muon and electron taggers as function of: - lepton likelihood (probability that lepton is real)
- (transverse momentum of lepton w.r.t jet axis)relTp
Electron tagMuon tag
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
26
Dilution of jet charge tagger is calculated as function of- the jet charge:
di - displacement of track i w.r.t the primary vertex - three jet charge tag types: displaced vertex, displaced
track and high momentum
Jet Charge Tagging
Combined tagging power of all five opposite side taggers (lepton + jet charge): D2 1.6 % calculated on inclusive lepton-SVT sample
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
27
Measurement of md and Tagger Calibration
Perform measurement of md Since we observe B0 oscillations, we can also measure tag dilutions Analyze hadronic and semileptonic decays of B0 and B+:
B0 D+
B+ D0
B0 J/K*0
B+ J/K+
B0/+ D- l+ X
B0/+ D-* l+ X
B+/0 D0 l+ X
Event by event predicted dilution (D) Fit the dilution calibration factor (S) for each of 5 tag types
Dilution calibration factors are used for the Bs mixing analysis
Dilution Calibration Factor
DSeB
tmDSeBt
dt
1:
)cos(1:/
/0
Event by event dilution
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
28
B0/B+ Semileptonic SignalsB mesons are identified by vertexing the trajectory of a D meson with a lepton trackEach lepton-D signature is a mixture of B0 and B+
B → l+D0X, D0 → K+- B → l+D-, D- → K+-- B → l+D*-, D*- → D0-
~100000 events ~52000 events ~25000 events B0/B+ ~ 20/80 B0/B+ ~ 85/15 B0/B+ ~ 85/15
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
29
B0/B+ Hadronic SignalsB0 → D-+, D- → K+-- B+ → D0+, D0 → K+-
~6200 events ~5600 events
The “double horn” structures on the low mass sidebands comes from partially reconstructed B mesons. Example: B+ → D*0 + , D*0 → D0 0
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
30
md ResultsHadronic: md = (0.503±0.063±0.015) ps-
1
Dilution calibration factors: S(muon) = 0.83±0.10±0.03 S(electron) = 0.79±0.14±0.04 S(vertex) = 0.78±0.19±0.05 S(track) = 0.76±0.21±0.03 S(high pT) = 1.35±0.26±0.02
Total D2 ~ 1.1%
Semileptonic: md = (0.498±0.028±0.015) ps-1
Dilution calibration factors: S(muon) = 0.93±0.04±0.03 S(electron) = 0.98±0.06±0.03 S(vertex) = 0.97±0.06±0.04 S(track) = 0.90±0.08±0.05 S(high pT) = 1.08±0.09±0.09
Total D2 ~ 1.4%
Muon Tags
World average: md = 0.502 0.007 ps-1
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
31
Amplitude Scan MethodIntroduce Fourier coefficient A (amplitude)Fix ms at different test values and fit for A: (Moser et.al., NIMA 384 491)
A 1 for true value of ms A 0 away from true value
Toy MC test with ms = 10 ps-1 and simulated sample 10x larger than real data - points: A 1 - yellow band: A 1.645 - dotted line: 1.645 - yellow band bellow 1 exclusion
at 95% CL
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
32
Bs Analysis Performed “blind” analysis by randomizing the tag decision: tag = tag (-1)event number
Evaluate sensitivity and systematic uncertainties from “blind” analysis
Systematic errors evaluated using pseudo-experiments:- include all variables and distributions determined from data
- fit the toy sample with different Likelihood configurations
- use variations in Amplitude (A) and statistical error (A) to derive the systematic error:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
33
Semileptonic Amplitude Scan Measurement is statistics dominated Main systematic uncertainties from prompt background and from Physics background
Sensitivity: 7.4 ps-1 Limit: ms > 7.7 ps-1 at 95% C.L.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
34
Hadronic Amplitude ScanMeasurement is statistics dominatedMain systematic errors come from tagger calibration
Sensitivity: 0.4 ps-1 Limit: ms > 0.0 ps-1 at 95% C.L.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
35
Combined CDF result on msAfter combining semileptonic and hadronic modes:
Sensitivity: 8.4 ps-1 Limit: ms > 7.9 ps-1
With full Bs momentum reconstruction, hadronic mode will dominate the measurement at high ms
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
36
Conclusions
95% C.L. ms limits from CDF:Semileptonic: 7.4 ps-1
Hadronic: 0.0 ps-1 (will become important at high ms with more statistics)
Combined limit: 7.9 ps-1, sensitivity: 8.4 ps-1
Results will substantially improve soon:- Same side Kaon tagger - Improve decay time resolution in hadronic modes- Add more data
Updated analyses expected soon
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
37
Sensitivity ProjectionsUse analytical formula to predict sensitivity as a function of Bs yield
current: no improvement, baseline: +1% D2 and 10% improvement in decay time resolutionstretched: +3% D2 and 20% improvement in decay time resolution
25ps-1
only in semileptonic case
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon
38
Amplitude Scan Method (cont)Test amplitude method on B0 oscillations by scanning for md in hadronic modes
zoom in