gbt long range transit plan 9/23/15
TRANSCRIPT
GOALS FOR THE EVENING:1 – Progress Update2 – Show the use of input3 – Solicit feedback on the proposals4 – Identify next steps
WELCOME
What is Task 5 – Long Range Plan?• A long range plan for GBT (3-10
years)• System structure • Short/Medium/ & Long Term
progression of changes
What are we trying to do?• Increase service in high bus ridership areas• Respond to community requests for more or
different bus services• Delineate improvements necessary to
implement Bus Rapid Transit and regional services (Stamford-New Haven)
• Address infrastructure and operational modifications necessary to implement new bus services
• Consider changes in land use in city and region that impact bus transit
Key Themes
• Provide more service, everywhere• Provide higher levels of service• Build a system for the future• Create a system with better
connections and access
Public survey Routes listed as used most often (156 responses)
25%
11%8%9%10%
8%
Percent
Coastal LinkRoute 1Route 6Route 8Route 9Route 10
What the public wanted• New areas such as
Kings Highway, Capital Ave, Bridgeport University
• Extensions of existing routes to make connections
• Regional connections ranked high
• NOTE: many asked for routings that already exist with a transfer
SYSTEM DESIGN CHARETTE
March 2015 - AttendeesGBT, GBRC, City of Bridgeport,Town of Stratford, Connecticut DOT
DESIGN CHARETTEGroup 1 key desire lines for high level transit service
Blue = BRTOrange = high frequencyRed = regional
DESIGN CHARETTEGroup 2 key desire lines for high level transit service
Blue = High Frequency serviceRed = key connectors
NRZ Plans: Common ThemesMOBILITY Pedestrian Access –
Improvements to Sidewalks, Signage (walkable)
Bicycle Access - Improved Amenities for Cyclists
STREETSCAPE Improved
Streetscapes - Friendly
Transit Amenities – Additional Bus Stops, Signage and Shelters
Transit Oriented Development
TRANSIT/ROADS Make Transit more
accessible and convenient
Directional Changes on roads (East End/East Side/South End)
Barnum Train Station FUNDING
Work to Find the Funding/Resources
Existing System: Areas of challengeLOW RIDERSHIPSPOT RIDERSHIPPROBLEMATIC ROADSNO SERVICE EXISTS TODAY
Existing System: Common Transfers
Route Transferred toRoute 1 Route 2 Route 3 Route 4 Route 5 Route 6 Route 7 Route 8 Route 9 Route 10 Route 13
1 33 39 7 22 21 11 2 38 21 24 62 29 38 28 17 8 20 1 61 28 19 83 14 27 22 12 19 12 3 22 15 12 84 8 20 6 11 3 4 0 19 11 11 65 28 22 12 9 16 12 0 30 30 13 106 14 26 13 5 10 6 0 21 6 14 37 1 2 3 2 1 5 1 1 2 4 08 40 41 22 20 27 14 4 74 21 26 169 21 33 16 20 24 12 1 29 23 36 8
10 31 16 22 19 12 10 4 45 27 20 813 10 11 3 13 13 2 0 14 6 11 1
Star
ting
Rout
e
Coverage vs Frequency• Coverage is
about providing access to transit
• Ridership is focused on the economics of service
• Every system has a unique balance
Regional serviceLocal service
Radial Network with some cross town links
Local serviceCommunity service
BRTHigh Frequency
Regional service
Radial Network with cross town links and layers of
service
All services the same Layered services
Why are routes grouped?
• based on area of service• There is a redefining of service
routing between routes• There is a change in the type of
service that the routes perform so they complement each other
• There are future service destinations
What we accomplish• Highlight key corridors for growth• Simplify routes• Link majority of key places with
higher frequency service• Minimize disruptions through
consolidation of services and new routings
• New infrastructure• More connections
Next Steps
• Finalize Proposals• Short Term – minor changes/hours• Medium term – FTN, major changes,
infrastructure• Long Term – BRT, regional
connections