general risk assessments
TRANSCRIPT
GENERAL RISK ASSESSMENTS Prepared by Nick Brion
July 2017
Cypress Place Waterford House
Long Furlong Clapham
West Sussex BN13 3UT
01903 871710
General Risk Assessments
3001/08/2017 Page 2
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4
2 Site Clearance .................................................................................................................................. 5
3 Buried Services ................................................................................................................................ 8
4 Excavations ...................................................................................................................................... 9
5 Concreting Operations ................................................................................................................... 12
6 Screeding ....................................................................................................................................... 15
7 Lifting Operations ........................................................................................................................... 17
8 Brickwork & Blockwork ................................................................................................................... 19
9 Work at Height ................................................................................................................................ 21
10 Roof Work ................................................................................................................................... 24
11 Placing of Roof Trusses ............................................................................................................. 27
12 Installation of Dry Lining / Partitioning ........................................................................................ 29
13 Installation of Plasterboard / Suspended Ceilings ...................................................................... 31
14 Carpentry & Joinery Work .......................................................................................................... 33
15 Plastering & Rendering ............................................................................................................... 35
16 Decorating .................................................................................................................................. 37
17 Plumbing & Heating .................................................................................................................... 39
18 Temporary Electrical Supplies .................................................................................................... 42
19 Low Voltage Electrical Works ..................................................................................................... 43
20 Use of Portable Electrical Equipment ......................................................................................... 44
21 Use of Hand Tools ...................................................................................................................... 46
22 Use of Abrasive Wheels ............................................................................................................. 47
23 Use of Circular Saws / Chop Saws ............................................................................................. 49
24 Use of Cartridge Operated Tools ................................................................................................ 51
25 Use of Hydraulic & Pneumatic Powered Equipment .................................................................. 53
26 Use of Ladders ........................................................................................................................... 56
27 Use of Step Ladders ................................................................................................................... 58
28 Use of Mobile Scaffold Towers ................................................................................................... 60
29 Use of Staging Systems ............................................................................................................. 62
30 Use of Access Scaffolding .......................................................................................................... 64
31 Use of Genie Lift ......................................................................................................................... 66
32 Use of Forklift Truck / Telehandler ............................................................................................. 68
33 Use of 360 degree Excavator ..................................................................................................... 71
34 Use of Dumper Trucks ................................................................................................................ 75
35 Use of Ride-on-Rollers ............................................................................................................... 78
36 Use of Compactor / Wacker Plate .............................................................................................. 80
37 Use of Cement Mixers ................................................................................................................ 82
General Risk Assessments
3001/08/2017 Page 3
38 Use of Vibrating Equipment (Risk of HAVS) .............................................................................. 84
39 General Manual Handling Assessments .................................................................................... 85
40 Noise Assessments .................................................................................................................... 88
General Risk Assessments
3001/08/2017 Page 4
1 Introduction
These are the general risk assessments relating to the key activities carried out by the Company.
They are to be used as a general reference when undertaking site work to ensure that general
hazards are documented, together with risk ratings before and after controls have been implemented,
and to ensure that the general control measures are implemented. They are to be used in conjunction
with the site specific risk assessment.
The management will ensure that employees and self employed sub-contractors are made aware of
the significant findings of the risk assessments and the general precautions to eliminate or reduce the
level of risk to the lowest possible level. A copy of the general risk assessments will be available in the
vans for easy reference.
Definitions
Hazard Hazard is something with the potential to cause harm (eg electricity, working at height, chemicals, vehicles)
Risk Combination of the likelihood and consequence of a specified hazardous event occurring.
Control Measures The measures necessary to eliminate or reduce the level of risk
Risk Rating Without Controls
Level of risk before any control measures are implemented
Risk Rating With Controls
Level of risk after control measures have been implemented
Determining the Risk Rating (See Risk Assessment Tables)
Risk Rating = Likelihood (of the hazard occurring) x Potential Severity (of the loss)
Likelihood (L)
The likelihood of harm occurring as result of the hazard:- 1 = Very unlikely 2 = Unlikely 3 = Possible 4 = Very likely 5 = Certain
Potential Severity (S)
The potential severity of harm caused:- 1 = Injury, no time off 2 = Injury, time off 3 = More than three days off 4 = Long term absence 5 = Death
Risk Rating (R)
Low = less than 7 Med = between 8 & 14 High = greater than 15
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 5
2 Site Clearance
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
General Health Hazards ( biological, waste materials, chemicals)
Operatives, potential for contact with diseases resulting in possible life threatening infections
3 4 Med
Site survey, investigation and analysis by competent body
Establish exclusion zones
Provide and wear suitable gloves and safety boots and safe systems of work
Enforce high standards of hygiene
Use of waterproof plasters
Provision of information on risks
Appropriate precautions such as vaccinations
1 4 Low
Manual Handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
4 4 High
Training in safe manual handling techniques
Maintain clear access routes to work areas
Provision of suitable mechanical handling equipment
Provision of wheel barrows for small components
Wear suitable gloves and safety boots
1 4 Low
Collision with vehicles
Operatives, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by vehicles/plant
3 5 High Traffic plan, signs, information at induction, lighting, suitable entrance/exit points
Physical separation between pedestrians and vehicles 1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High
Fences or barriers around site with appropriate signs and lighting
Cover with secured and robust plates
Backfill as necessary
1 5 Low
Spread of contamination off site
General public, possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
2 5 Med Wheel wash facilities on site if required and sheeting down of lorries
Careful control of discharges of water 1 5 Low
Explosion Operatives, general public, potential major injury, burns or death
2 5 Med
Identify and remove all redundant gas or flammable liquid storage vessels after establishing “no naked flames” safety zone
Consult borehole information for details of gases and remove by ventilation or specialist techniques
1 5 Low
Dust
Operatives, general public– potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 2 Med Natural rainfall or controlled wetting of the surfaces
Wear suitable dust mask if high levels of dust observed 2 2 Low
Slips, trips and falls Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor
4 3 High Suitable safety footwear worn
Regular cleaning and clearing of waste 1 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 6
2 Site Clearance
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
or major injury as a result of falling over
Provision of temporary paths
Suitable lighting
Falls from height Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Suitable work equipment and edge protection
Clearly identified safe routes for pedestrians
Warning signs
1 5 Low
Collapse of excavation sides or existing pits or underground voids
Operatives, others in vicinity – injury /death through falling into excavations or injury death through excavation collapse
4 4 High
Substitute machine digging instead of hand digging
Use trench supports or battering as required
Work carried out and supervised by competent persons
Calculations by site engineer
Daily inspection / close monitoring
1 4 Low
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med Site noisy continuous running plant away from workers.
Enforce wearing of high quality ear defenders. 2 2 Med
Contact with buried services
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Contact owner to arrange examination of locations of services including site
survey using available drawings, and location devices (radar or CAT type).
Arrange for disconnection and where necessary purging/draining down.
1 5 Low
Contact with UXB Operatives, others in vicinity- risk of death by explosion
3 5 High Contact owner to establish if site in area bombed during WW2 or for army live fire
testing training
Risk profile site using data base if high risk undertake detailed survey
1 5 Low
Electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High
Survey of electrical systems
Isolation and lock off electrical supplies before starting work
Use qualified electricians
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Environmental Protection Act 1990 • Control of Pollution Act 1974 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Control of Lead at Work Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Special Waste Regulations 1996 • Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 • EH40 Occupational exposure limits
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 7
2 Site Clearance
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• HSG 66 Protection of workers and the public during the development of contaminated land
Managerial / Supervisory
• It must not be assumed that the forecast level of contamination will be accurate, arrangements should be in place for examining the effectiveness of control methods and the level of contamination being encountered.
• Reasonable enquiries should be made of local people and experts (industrial archaeologists) to obtain additional information on likely hazards. • The emergency services should be contacted in all cases and appraised of/visit the site situation regarding types of emergency, route for access, programme of work, contact person.
Training
• Operatives to undertake Induction training, as required.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 8
3 Buried Services
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Contact with electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Planning to avoid known services by obtaining plans from owners who may have
services in the area. 1 5 Low
Contact with sewerage containing unknown chemicals and biological hazards such as Weil's Disease
Operatives, potential for contact with diseases resulting in possible life threatening infections
3 5 High
Studying plans (sometimes with the owner) on site, tracing with cable and pipe locating devices, marking the location of suspected routes of services in conjunction with a study of street furniture (manhole covers, meter housings) and disturbed surfaces (reinstatement). Personnel should not wear synthetic clothing.
1 5 Low
Rupture of liquid or gas fuel pipelines with risk of ignition, fire and explosion Rupture of hazardous gas or liquid pipelines (toxic, corrosive, flammable)
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by fire or explosion
3 5 High Excavating for suspected location of services by trained persons using safe
digging techniques and marking on the surface the true location. 1 5 Low
Damage to telemetry (eg telephone or fibre optic cables) (costly but unlikely to be injurious)
Operatives 3 2 Low
Subsequent mechanical excavation or use of no-dig technology supervised by experienced banksmen to identify further evidence of undiscovered services, finally exposing them safely by hand when within 500mm of the suspected service.
1 2 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
Managerial / Supervisory
• Ensure site survey undertaken before work commences to establish site specific risks • Prepare safe system of work and risk assessment before work commences • Ongoing liaison with person in control of premises and other contractors.
Training
• Operatives to undertake Induction training, as required.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 9
4 Excavations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Drowning Operatives, uninvited persons risk of death by drowning
2 5 Med Remove water.
Provision of escape ladders. 1 5 Low
Biological
Operatives, potential for contact with diseases resulting in possible life threatening infections
2 5 Med Enforce high standards of personal hygiene including eating and smoking only
after washing hands.
Provide accurate and relevant information on risks.
1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med
Training in safe manual handling techniques.
Provide clear access routes to work areas.
Provide points of attachment on all plant to facilitate mechanical handling.
Provide wheelbarrows for small components.
Gloves and safety footwear worn
1 4 Low
Collision with vehicles
Operatives – major injury or death by being run over by vehicles operated by others
3 5 High Physical separation between pedestrians and vehicles. 1 5 Low
Collapse of excavation sides
Operatives, others in vicinity – injury /death through falling into excavations or injury death through excavation collapse
3 5 High
Minimise excavation by using no dig technology.
Substitute machine digging instead of hand digging.
Stabilise the ground using trench support remotely installed (ie from outside the excavation) or by battering, grouting, chemical stabilisation or ground freezing.
Supervision and carrying out of the work by suitable, experienced and competent persons.
Calculations by site engineer following detailed site investigation.
Planned sequence of operations and details of any temporary support, eg bog mats and system for transfer of materials to minimise surcharges to the support system.
Special support to any exposed structure or equipment.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High Backfill cover with secured and robust plates.
Security fences or barriers with appropriate signs and lighting. 1 5 Low
Spread of contamination off site
General public, possible minor or major injury as
3 3 Med Limited access to site for vehicles
Wheel wash facilities on site if required. 1 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 10
4 Excavations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
a result of falling over Careful control of discharges of water.
Collapse of adjacent structures
Operatives, others in vicinity – falling structure leading to major or fatal injuries
3 5 High
Reroute the excavation.
Temporary support or other engineering solution.
Careful monitoring of structure and water/fines movement.
1 5 Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 2 Med Natural rainfall or controlled wetting of the exposed surfaces, provided run off is
drained and suitably cleaned before return to surface water drains. 2 2 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
4 4 High
Suitable footwear and regular cleaning and clearing of waste.
Provide stone paths.
Suitable lighting.
1 4 Low
Falls from height Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Substantial edge protection and suitable crossing points.
Edge protection removed only for the time needed to move materials. 1 5 Low
Use of vibrating equipment. Operatives – potential vibration white finger
4 4 High
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives.
Use modern well maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking.
Operatives aware of the amount of vibration the appliance produces and the amount of time they can use it for
Operative to report any symptoms or problems
1 4 Low
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med Position noisy, continuously running plant away from workers.
Enforce wearing of high quality ear defenders. 2 2 Low
Electrocution/explosion Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major injury, burns or death
3 5 High
Reroute to avoid overhead or underground services or isolate, locate and mark location and use safe digging techniques.
Consult borehole information for details of contamination and remove by ventilation or specialist techniques.
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • HS(G) 47: Avoiding danger from underground services • HS(G) 66: Protection of workers and the public during development of contaminated land
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 11
4 Excavations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• HS(G) 185: Health and safety in excavations. • BS 6031: Code of practice for earthworks. • EH40 Occupational exposure limits. • Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) Report 97 Trenching practice.
Managerial / Supervisory
• Minimum daily inspection of excavation and weekly report.
Training
• Excavation support.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 12
5 Concreting Operations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
4 4 High
Training in safe manual handling techniques.
Provision of clear access routes to work areas.
Provision of points of attachment on all plant to facilitate mechanical handling.
Consider pumping or conveyors for placing concrete.
Use of specialist levelling, compaction and finishing tools, screeders, eg long handled aluminium floats and "vibra strike".
1 4 Low
Work in Hot and Wet weather conditions
Operatives,- possible heat stress and hypothermia
3 3 Med
Provision of drinking water, knowledge of and monitoring of heat stress symptoms.
Provision of shelter close to the work area with warming facilities, knowledge of and monitoring for symptoms
1 3 Low
Contact with electricity whilst operating machinery or leads
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution
3 5 High
Suitably protected 110v supplies and frequent portable appliance testing. RCD protection for 240v equipment.
Consider combustion engine powered compaction (should be sited safely to avoid ingress of fumes in confined spaces).
1 5 Low
Contact with moving machinery or vehicles
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of entanglement resulting in injury
3 5 High
All machinery movements to be under the control of a qualified banksman/slinger.
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
Minimise reversing movements and follow site traffic arrangements in health and safety plan.
1 5 Low
Contact with cleaning swabs
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 4 Med Controlled and restricted area for discharging pump cleaning swabs. 1 4 Low
Dermatitis and concrete burns and cement contact with eyes
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
4 4 High
Training & information to employees about the risk.
Provide suitable gloves and protective clothing and barrier cream.
Provide suitable washing facilities with warm water.
Provide eye wash stations close to the work area.
Consider eye protection.
1 4 Low
Collision with plant during mechanical handling
Operatives –risk of major injury by being struck
3 5 High
Specific site rules to identify where men are to take refuge during mechanical handling operations.
Use qualified banksman/slinger.
Provide toeboard or brickguard with edge protection.
Minimise the number of people in the placing area.
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 13
5 Concreting Operations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med Careful siting and use of sound insulation for continuously running plant.
Provision and enforced wearing of high quality ear defenders. 2 2 Low
Unauthorised access until concrete has hardened
General public, children – major injuries through falls, drowning etc
3 5 High Suitable fencing.
Consider use of supervision at other times. 1 5 Low
Fall of materials, and plant
Operatives, General Public – major injuries or fatalities as a result of falling material/plant
3 5 High Plan that lifting shall not involve materials being moved over people.
Tested equipment, inspected on the day, under the control and operation of competent people.
1 5 Low
Use of vibrating equipment. Operatives – potential vibration white finger
4 4 High
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives.
Use modern well maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking.
Operatives aware of the amount of vibration the appliance produces and the amount of time they can use it for
Operative to report any symptoms or problems
1 4 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med
Provide safe access routes.
Good housekeeping.
Edge protection where there is a risk of falls at edges or openings.
Good lighting, particularly during finishing operations.
1 4 Low
Collapse of structure
Operatives, others in vicinity – falling structure leading to major or fatal injuries
3 5 High
Accurate design calculations.
Check before pouring to be carried out by temporary works co-ordinator.
Concrete cube tests to be conducted
Decision to strike to be carried out by temporary works co-ordinator.
Supervision and carrying out of the work by suitable, experienced and competent people.
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (as amended) (PUWER) • Confined Spaces Regulations 1997 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • HS(G) 32: Safety in falsework for in situ beams and slabs • HS(G) 144: Safe use of vehicles in construction work • HS(G) 46: A guide for small contractors: site safety and concrete construction
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 14
5 Concreting Operations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• HSE construction information sheets No. 18 The provision of welfare facilities at fixed construction sites, No. 26 Cement. • CITB, GE 700
Managerial / Supervisory
• Strict monitoring of all temporary works and approvals to pour. • Careful monitoring of the effects of the weather on fatigue/heat stress. • Environmental or waste management constraints should be considered (disposal of waste materials).
Training
• Banksman/slinger. • Plant operators.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 15
6 Screeding
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falling from height Falling material
Operatives – potential falls or falling materials leading to major injury
3 4 Med
Site specific risk assessment to assess risks and identify the most appropriate equipment for working at height
Use safe system of work for use of equipment for working at height (ie mobile scaffold tower, MEWP)
Use of well maintained equipment by competent operatives
1 4 Low
Fall of material Operatives / Other workers in vicinity
4 3 Med Ensure work platforms have suitable protection against falling material.
Exclude persons from below work area. 1 3 Low
Contact with moving machinery or vehicles
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of entanglement resulting in injury or death
3 5 High
Maintenance of mixer guards.
Training in acting as a banksman for Forklift Operations.
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
1 4 Low
Dust/Particles in Eyes
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 2 Low Use chemical methods to encourage adhesion during surface preparation ie
PVA,
Availability of safety glasses for overhead work.
1 2 Low
Inhalation of Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 2 Low
Provide natural ventilation.
Use vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear suitable P3 masks if sweeping.
Operative to be clean shaved and face fit tested
1 2 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med
Utilise mechanical handling where possible.
Provide training, deliver close to the work area, provide assistance and trolleys.
Wear suitable gloves and safety boots/steel toe capped wellingtons
2 3 Low
Contact with cement / Dermatitis
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
2 2 Low
Use of barrier cream and monitoring of skin condition or wear suitable gloves.
Consider eye protection,
Ensure eye wash in first aid kit on site,
Provide suitable washing facilities
Wear suitable gloves and safety boots/steel toe capped wellingtons
1 2 Low
Electricity Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution
3 5 High
Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution and tools.
User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads.
Use of 110 volt equipment, preference given to battery tools.
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 16
6 Screeding
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Obtain information on services buried in the wall.
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
4 3 Med
Provide safe access routes.
Good lighting.
Procedure for waste removal and responsibility for daily cleaning.
2 3 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HSG150: Health and safety in construction
• L5: General COSHH ACOP • Manufacturer's safety data sheets supplied with material.
Training
• Manual handling
Management
• Plasterers are likely to adapt access equipment/take unnecessary risks at height/use substandard access equipment, particularly step ladders. Daily supervision is essential
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 17
7 Lifting Operations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Equipment overturning/failing
Operatives, General Public – major injuries or fatalities as a result of being struck by falling equipment
3 5 High
Use of contract lift for crane works
Use of telehandler for general lifting operations
The organisation and control of all lifting operations to be under the responsibility of a competent and experienced person.
Matters to be considered will include access for the lifting equipment, ground conditions, weather restrictions, overhead restrictions, proximity of lifting equipment to loading position, loads to be within safe working load of lifting equipment, thorough examination certificate for lifting equipment to be up to date, test certificates for slinging equipment to be up to date, competency of lifting equipment operators and signaller/slinger to be approved.
Monitor lifting equipment operations whilst lifting.
Competent person to organise and take responsibility for the lifting operation.
Lift plan developed for contract lift by contract lift company
Lift plan to be developed by site manager for general lifting operations using telehandler
Site survey to highlight presence of overhead electrical cables which could be rerouted/removed/insulated. Otherwise lifting equipment not to operate within distance decided by controller of lifting operations in liaison with electricity supplier (7 metre minimum).
Site survey to highlight other obstructions like buildings/trees and suitable precautions taken to avoid striking.
1 5 Low
Materials falling during lifting operations
Operatives, General Public – major injuries or fatalities as a result of being struck by falling load/materials
3 5 High
Loads to be slung by competent slingers who will ensure stability and security of loads. All lifting gear to be examined before use and to hold six monthly test certificate.
Slinger/signaller to have clear communication with the lifting equipment operator at all times using signals or radio contact.
As far as practicable prevent people from entering area below a suspended or moving load.
lifting equipment and lifting gear must be examined and tested as prescribed by the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER Regulations).
The equipment must be maintained in an efficient state, working order and good repair.
As far as the construction of the lifting equipment permits it should be inspected
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 18
7 Lifting Operations
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
regularly and at least once a week by the operator or other competent person in accordance with manufacturers' instructions.
All loads to be lifted to be within the safe working load of the lifting equipment and its accessories.
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Health and Safety (Safety, Signs and Signals) Regulations 1996 • Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 • BS 7121 Code of Practice for safe use of cranes: Part 1 • GS6 Avoidance of danger from overhead electrical lines • PM16 Eyebolts
Managerial / Supervisory
• Organisation and control prior to and during all lifting operations. • Method statements to include details of how all lifting operations are organised/controlled on site.
Training
• Operation of lifting equipment and slinging of loads. • Signalling.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 19
8 Brickwork & Blockwork
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Manual handling; slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med
Training in safe manual handling techniques.
Provide well maintained wheelbarrows, minimise distance from material offloading areas.
Provide clear access routes to work areas.
Use blocks weighting less than 25 kg
1 4 Low
Wearing PPE in hot weather Operatives-Possible Heat stress
3 4 Med Provision of drinking water, knowledge of and monitoring of heat stress
symptoms 1 4 Low
Ill effects from wind chill, wet conditions and static nature of work
Operatives- possible hypothermia
3 4 Med Provision of shelter close to the work area with warming facilities, knowledge of
and monitoring for hypothermia symptoms. 1 4 Low
Dermatitis and concrete burns and cement contact with eyes
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 4 Med Provide suitable gloves and barrier cream. Provide suitable washing facilities with
warm water. 1 4 Low
Silica dust
Operatives and others in the immediate vicinity- for risk refer to COSHH assessments
3 4 Med
Use of running water to suppress dust whilst cutting bricks/blocks
Wear FFP 3 mask
Operative to be clean shaved and face fit tested
If not use of air fed mask
1 4 Low
Collapse of unset masonry or stacks of bricks or blocks
Operatives, others in vicinity – falling structure/materials leading to major or fatal injuries
3 5 High Monitor heights of fresh walling and storage of materials. 1 5 Low
Contact with electricity whilst operating machinery or leads
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution
3 5 High Suitably protected 110v supplies and frequent Portable Appliance Testing.
Substitution with non-electric mixers. 1 5 Low
Contact with moving machinery or vehicles
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of entanglement resulting in injury
3 5 High
Maintenance of mixer guards.
Training in acting as a banksman for Forklift Operations.
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
1 5 Low
Falls from small trestles, hop ups etc
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor injury as a result of falling off
3 5 High Arrange for scaffolders to erect trestles and provide level or suitably stepped area
to erect trestles.
Use of additional guard rails
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 20
8 Brickwork & Blockwork
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Use of bean bags
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002). • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989. • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HS(G)149 Backs for the future: Safe manual handling in construction • L5 General COSHH ACOP
Managerial / Supervisory
• Environmental or waste management constraints should be considered (disposal of waste materials and handling of fuels and o ils). • Regular inspection of working platforms.
Training
• The manual handling assessments and COSHH assessments should be given to site management and the information in them passed on to bricklayers and labourers. • All workers should be instructed on the safe systems of work. • Manual handling training — safe lifting techniques for large blocks and bags of cement, even though ideally lighter blocks and smaller bags of cement should be used.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 21
9 Work at Height
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height
Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death 3 5 High
Work off suitable guarded platform ie scaffolding, scaffold towers,
Provision of fully boarded scaffold to roof edges.
Provide safety nets or crash decks or, if not feasible, use safety harnesses securely anchored with rescue provision.
Installation of temporary guard rails on open edges.
Suspend work in inclement weather
Use of suitable secure roof ladders, along with edge protection – see risk assessment for roof ladders
Only use ladders for access – see risk assessment for ladders
Only use step ladders for shot duration, light work and when it is not practicable to use towers etc – see risk assessment for step ladders
See risk assessments for Towers
See risk assessments for work on fragile roofs
1 5 Low
Falling materials
Operatives, General Public – falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
4 5 High
Prohibit work below using barriers etc.
Use of brick guards, etc on scaffolding, particular over busy areas of the site
Use of double height brick guards on plot 9 as close to site boundary
Hard hats to be worn by all persons working at ground level
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High Ideally remove ladders to scaffolding, otherwise board up
In high risk areas, ensure scaffolding is alarmed with suitable warning signs 1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med
Use mechanical handling where possible (ie use of hoist)
Deliver close to the work area and provide assistance.
Wear suitable gloves and safety boots
2 3 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med Provision of waste skips and responsibility for daily cleaning.
Suspend work in inclement weather. 1 4 Low
Nails Operatives, other workers- possible minor injuries due to stepping
3 4 Med Removal of protruding nails.
Safety footwear with midsoles to be worn. 1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 22
9 Work at Height
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
on protruding nails
Contact with sharp material during stripping work
Operatives-possible minor injury due to contact with sharp materials
4 3 Med Suitable gloves to be worn 1 3 Low
Contact with wet cement – possible dermatitis
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 4 Med
Operatives warned about hazards with cement
Suitable gloves worn
Barrier cream to be available
Eye protection to be worn if there is a risk of splashing wet cement
1 4 Low
Sunburn & Dehydration Operatives,- possible heat stress, sunburn and skin cancers
4 4 High
Encourage workers to cover up exposed parts of their body and head as much as possible
Provision of suncream
Adequate supply of drinking water on site
Rest breaks out of the sun
2 3 Low
Cold weather Operatives,- possible hypothermia
4 4 High Supply of suitable clothing and gloves for cold, wet conditions
Rest breaks in warm, dry area 2 3 Low
Lightning Strike Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution
3 5 High Worker to cease work and come down from roof if there is an electrical storm in
the vicinity 0 0 Nil
Excessive Wind
Operatives, General Public – falling persons/objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High Worker to cease work and come down from roof if the wind is excessive 0 0 Nil
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • HSG 33 Health and safety in roofwork
Managerial / Supervisory
• Risk assessments by management/fitters.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 23
9 Work at Height
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Training
• General working at height requirements / roof work.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 24
10 Roof Work
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height
Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death 3 5 High
Work off suitable guarded platform ie scaffolding, scaffold towers,
Provision of fully boarded scaffold to roof edges.
Provide safety nets or crash decks or, if not feasible, use safety harnesses securely anchored with rescue provision.
Installation of temporary guard rails on open edges.
Suspend work in inclement weather
Use of suitable secure roof ladders, along with edge protection – see risk assessment for roof ladders
Only use ladders for access – see risk assessment for ladders
Only use step ladders for short duration, light work and when it is not practicable to use towers etc – see risk assessment for step ladders
See risk assessments for Towers
1 5 Low
Falls through fragile surfaces
Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Survey site and undertake site specific risk assessment
If necessary, obtain report from structural engineer
Fragile surfaces or roof lights – either cover with suitable material or install temporary barriers to prevent workers from stepping on fragile surfaces
Warn workers about the hazard
1 5 Low
Falling materials
Operatives, General Public – falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
4 5 High
Prohibit work below using barriers etc.
Use of brick guards, fans, netting etc on scaffolding, particular over busy areas of the site
Hard hats to be worn by all persons working at ground level
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High Ideally remove ladders to scaffolding, otherwise board up
In high risk areas, ensure scaffolding is alarmed with suitable warning signs 1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med Use mechanical handling where possible (ie use of hoist)
Deliver close to the work area and provide assistance. 2 3 Low
Slips, trips and falls Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor 3 4 Med
Provision of waste skips and responsibility for daily cleaning.
Suspend work in inclement weather. 1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 25
10 Roof Work
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
or major injury as a result of falling over
Nails
Operatives, other workers- possible minor injuries due to stepping on protruding nails
3 4 Med Removal of protruding nails.
Safety footwear with midsoles to be worn. 1 4 Low
Contact with lead
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 3 Med See risk assessment for lead work 3 1 Low
Contact with sharp material during stripping work
Operatives-possible minor injury due to contact with sharp materials
4 3 Med Suitable gloves to be worn 1 3 Low
Contact with wet cement – possible dermatitis
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 4 Med
Operatives warned about hazards with cement
Suitable gloves worn
Barrier cream to be available
Eye protection to be worn if there is a risk of splashing wet cement
1 4 Low
Sunburn & Dehydration Operatives,- possible heat stress, sunburn and skin cancers
4 4 High
Encourage workers to cover up exposed parts of their body and head as much as possible
Provision of sun cream
Adequate supply of drinking water on site
Rest breaks out of the sun
2 3 Low
Cold weather Operatives,- possible hypothermia
4 4 High Supply of suitable clothing and gloves for cold, wet conditions
Rest breaks in warm, dry area 2 3 Low
Lightning Strike Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution
3 5 High Worker to cease work and come down from roof if there is an electrical storm in
the vicinity 0 0 Nil
Excessive Wind
Operatives, General Public – falling persons/objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High Worker to cease work and come down from roof if the wind is excessive 0 0 Nil
Relevant legislation and sources of information
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 26
10 Roof Work
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • HSG 33 Health and safety in roof work
Managerial / Supervisory
• Manual handling of trusses not to proceed if weight exceeds 25kg per worker.
Training
• Manual handling.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 27
11 Placing of Roof Trusses
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height
Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Assemble roof on the floor slab and crane into position using manufacturer's approved scheme for lifting and suitable lifting equipment.
Provide safety nets or crash decks or, if not feasible, use safety harnesses securely anchored with rescue provision.
Installation of temporary guard rails.
Provision of fully boarded scaffold to roof edges.
Plank out truss where bracings are to be fixed if trusses are spaced at more that 600 centres and potential fall is over 2m.
1 5 Low
Falling materials Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
4 5 High Prohibit work below using barriers etc.
Hard hats to be worn by all persons working at ground level 1 5 Low
Fall of gable walls Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Build after trusses are fixed. 1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med
Use mechanical handling where possible and always if work is over two storeys high.
Provide training, adapt scaffold to suit manual handling of trusses (see figure 20(b) in HSG 33).
Deliver close to the work area and provide assistance.
1 4 Low
Fall of trusses
Operatives, other workers, general public– potential falls leading to major injury or death
4 5 High Sequence of erection and temporary bracings in accordance with truss
manufacturer's written procedure. 1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med
Provision of waste skips and responsibility for daily cleaning.
Use of purpose made hop-ups or access equipment.
Suspend work in inclement weather.
1 4 Low
Nails
Operatives, other workers- possible minor injuries due to stepping on protruding nails
3 4 Med Removal of protruding nails.
Safety footwear with midsoles to be worn. 1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 28
11 Placing of Roof Trusses
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • HSG 33 Health and safety in roof work
Managerial / Supervisory
• Manual handling of trusses not to proceed if weight exceeds 25kg per worker.
Training
• Manual handling.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 29
12 Installation of Dry Lining / Partitioning
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Dust/Particles in Eyes Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for eye injuries
3 2 Low Availability of safety glasses for overhead work. 1 2 Low
Inhalation of Dust/fibres
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems
3 2 Low
Using cutting techniques to minimise dust. Provide natural ventilation. Wear gloves when handling insulation. Use vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear suitable masks if sweeping.
1 2 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Utilise mechanical handling where possible. Provide training, install stairs early, deliver close to the work area, provide
assistance and trolleys. 2 3 Low
Use of hazardous substances
Operatives – possible skin irritation and development of dermatitis
2 2 Low Use of barrier cream and monitoring of skin condition. 1 2 Low
Contact with electrical supplies
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution and tools. User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads, preference given to battery tools. Information on services buried in the wall.
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992(As amended 2002) • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • L5: General COSHH ACOP • EH (46): Man-made mineral fibres • Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) GE700 Series, Modules 6, 7, 9, 29, 33 and 35. • Manufacturer's safety data sheets supplied with material.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 30
12 Installation of Dry Lining / Partitioning
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Training
• Manual handling. • Use of cartridge tools.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 31
13 Installation of Plasterboard / Suspended Ceilings
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falling from height Falling material
Operatives, General Public – falling people/objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Site specific risk assessment to assess risks and identify the most appropriate equipment for working at height
Use safe system of work for use of equipment for working at height (ie mobile scaffold tower, MEWP)
Use of well maintained equipment by competent operatives
1 5 Low
Dust/Particles in Eyes Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for eye injuries
3 2 Low Availability of safety glasses for overhead work. 1 2 Low
Inhalation of Dust/fibres
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems
3 2 Low
Using cutting techniques to minimise dust. Provide natural ventilation. Wear gloves when handling insulation. Use vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear suitable masks if sweeping.
1 2 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Utilise mechanical handling where possible. Provide training, deliver close to the work area, provide assistance and trolleys.
2 3 Low
Use of hazardous substances
Operatives – possible skin irritation and development of dermatitis
2 2 Low Use of barrier cream and monitoring of skin condition. 1 2 Low
Contact with electrical supplies
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution and tools. User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads, preference given to battery tools. Information on services buried in the wall.
1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
4 3 Med
Procedure for waste removal and responsibility for daily cleaning. Careful siting of cables. Use of purpose made hop ups or access equipment. Provision of suitable lighting, eg fluorescent tubes (non-glare).
1 3 Low
Sharp Edges
Operatives-possible minor injury due to contact with sharp materials
3 2 Low Remove waste material regularly taking care not to expose sharp edges to
others (ie in skips) Use gloves
2 2 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 32
13 Installation of Plasterboard / Suspended Ceilings
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Nails
Operatives, other workers- possible minor injuries due to stepping on protruding nails
2 3 Low Removal of protruding nails. Safety footwear with midsoles to be worn.
1 3 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • L5: General COSHH ACOP • EH (46): Man-made mineral fibres • Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) GE700 Series, Modules 6, 7, 9, 29, 33 and 35. • Manufacturer's safety data sheets supplied with material.
Training
• Manual handling • Work at Height
Management
• Requires monitoring to ensure safe systems of work are adhered to.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 33
14 Carpentry & Joinery Work
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Handling vibrating equipment
List significant vibration tasks:
Operatives – potential vibration white finger
4 3 Med Provide a system for monitoring the health of Operatives. Use modern well-maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking.
2 3 Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 3 Med Use a vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, provide hoses and extraction units
to woodworking machinery, wear masks and goggles in accordance with any assessment carried out under COSHH.
2 3 Low
Manual Handling Significant manual handling tasks:
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
4 3 Med Use mechanical handling where possible, provide training, install stairs early,
deliver close to the work area, provide assistance and trolleys or wheelbarrows. 2 3 Low
Noise induced hearing loss
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 1 Low Job rotation for noisy operations and provision of suitable hearing protection. Carry out work in a separate area to other workers.
2 1 Low
Electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution. User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads, use of 110 Vac tools, preference
given to battery tools. 1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med Regular waste removal and responsibility for daily cleaning. Use of purpose made hop ups or access equipment.
1 4 Low
Nails
Operatives, other workers- possible minor injuries due to stepping on protruding nails
3 2 Med Removal of protruding nails. Safety footwear with midsoles to be worn.
1 2 Low
Ergonomics
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains,
3 3 Med Careful design of task and selection of PPE, eg bump caps. Provision of suitable tooling, eg electric planers.
2 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 34
14 Carpentry & Joinery Work
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
strains, cuts, fractures etc
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • L114: Safe use of woodworking machinery • HS(G) 83: Training woodworking machinists • HS(G) 88: Hand–arm vibration • CRR73: Dust and noise in the construction process • WIS1: Wood dust: hazards and precautions • WIS13: Noise at woodworking machines • WIS15: Safe working at woodworking machines • British Woodworking Federation Health and Safety Guide, Construction Industry Press.
Training
• Manual handling • Safe use and inspection of machinery (see L114 referred to above).
Management
• Regular monitoring of housekeeping and fall prevention measures, imported or DIY woodworking machinery, eg circular bench saws without a riving knife used for ripping.
Recommendations
• If fine dust is produced, details of ventilation and PPE are required. Prevention of unauthorised use of bench machines.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 35
15 Plastering & Rendering
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falling from height
Operatives, General Public – falling people leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Site specific risk assessment to assess risks and identify the most appropriate equipment for working at height
Use safe system of work for use of equipment for working at height (ie mobile scaffold tower, MEWP)
Use of well maintained equipment by competent operatives
1 5 Low
Fall of material
Operatives, General Public – falling people/material leading to major injuries or fatalities
4 3 Med Ensure work platforms have suitable protection against falling material. Exclude persons from below work area.
1 3 Low
Dust/Particles in Eyes Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for eye injuries
3 2 Low Use chemical methods to encourage adhesion during surface preparation ie
PVA, Availability of safety glasses for overhead work.
1 2 Low
Inhalation of Dust Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems
3 2 Low Provide natural ventilation. Use vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear suitable masks if sweeping.
1 2 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Utilise mechanical handling where possible. Provide training, deliver close to the work area, provide assistance and trolleys.
2 3 Low
Contact with cement / Dermatitis
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
2 2 Low
Use of barrier cream and monitoring of skin condition or wear suitable gloves. Consider eye protection, Ensure eye wash in first aid kit on site, Provide suitable washing facilities
1 2 Low
Electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High
Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution and tools. User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads. Useof 110 voltequipment, preference given to battery tools. Obtain information on services buried in the wall.
1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a
4 3 Med Provide safe acess routes. Good lighting. Procedure for waste removal and responsibility for daily cleaning.
2 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 36
15 Plastering & Rendering
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
result of falling over
Asbestos on external surfaces
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for lung disease if exposed to asbestos dust
3 5 High Ensure survey already carried out under Asbestos Regulations 2002. Stop work immediately if contact made with material that could be asbestos and
inform the management 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HSG150: Health and safety in construction
• L5: General COSHH ACOP • Manufacturer's safety data sheets supplied with material.
Training
• Manual handling
Management
• Plasterers are likely to adapt access equipment/take unnecessary risks at height/use substandard access equipment, particularly step ladders. Daily supervision is essential
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 37
16 Decorating
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falling from height
Operatives, General Public – falling people leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Site specific risk assessment to assess risks and identify the most appropriate equipment for working at height
Use safe system of work for use of equipment for working at height (ie mobile scaffold tower, MEWP)
Use of well maintained equipment by competent operatives
1 5 Low
Falling Objects
Operatives, General Public – falling people/objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 2 Low
Use of suitable work equipment with edge protection where required Use trained and experienced operatives Operatives to wear hard hats and safety footwear Other site users kept clear – fence off areas where persons are likely to walk
beneath work area
1 2 Low
Paint / Solvent Fumes
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
3 2 Low Ensure adequate ventilation Undertake COSHH assessment to determine suitable controls Wear suitable Respiratory Protective Equipment, if necessary
2 2 Low
Paint / Solvent / Adhesive in contact with body
Operatives – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
4 2 Med Undertake COSHH assessment to determine suitable controls Wear gloves Washing facilities with warm water & soap
2 2 Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 3 Med Ensure adequate ventilation Clean up dust using vacuum cleaner Wear respiratory mask
2 3 Low
Grazes from use of sandpaper
Operatives-possible minor injuries i.e. grazes and burns due to contact with abrasive materials
4 1 Low Wear suitable gloves Use suitable sanding block
2 1 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HSG150 Health and Safety in Construction • CIS40 General Access Scaffolds and Ladders
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 38
16 Decorating
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• BS1129: Specification for portable timber ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging • BS2037: Specification for portable aluminium ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging•
Training
• All users (correct method of climbing, inspection, erection, lowering and working from).
Management
• Daily monitoring by site manager.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 39
17 Plumbing & Heating
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med
Training in safe manual handling techniques. Provide clear access routes to work areas. Provide mechanical handling and positioning, eg genie lifts. Provide sack trucks or assistance for moving bottles or have smaller bottles. Supply pipes in shorter lengths, eg 3m long.
1 4 Low
Contact with machinery Operatives-possible , cuts, grazes, fractures etc and entanglement
3 4 Med Guarding for pipe threading machines 1 4 Low
Flying swarf Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible eye injuries
3 4 Med Provide eye wash stations close to the work area. Use eye protection.
1 4 Low
Explosion Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-risk of major burns or fire
3 5 High Safe storage of gas. Flash-back and blow-back arrestors.
1 5 Low
Dust/fumes
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
3 3 Low
Work in the open air. Provide portable local exhaust ventilation. Consider prefabrication. Choose safe types of solder. Provide suitable face mask. Prohibit eating, drinking or smoking in the work area.
1 3 Low
Fall of material/fall from height
Operatives, General Public – falling people/objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High Scaffolding, crash decks or nets. Young-man stagings secured with handrails. Establish exclusion zones below work area.
1 5 Low
Use of hazardous substances List::
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
2 3 Low
Choose safe cutting fluid. Information and awareness of the risk. Provide suitable gloves and protective clothing and barrier cream. Provide suitable washing facilities with warm water.
1 3 Low
Fire / Burns
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-risk of major injuries or death
3 5 High Safe storage of gas. Operation of a hot works permit. Use compression fittings instead of soldered joints.
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 40
17 Plumbing & Heating
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise induced hearing loss
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
2 3 Low Job rotation for noisy operations and provision of suitable hearing protection. Carry out work in a separate area to other workers.
1 5 Low
Contact with electrical supplies
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Inspection and maintenance of site electrical distribution. User inspection of tools, careful siting of leads, preference given to battery tools.
1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med Provision of waste skips and responsibility for daily cleaning. Use of purpose-made hop-ups or access equipment. Good lighting.
1 4 Low
Ergonomics
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
4 4 High Careful design of task and selection of PPE, eg bump caps. Provision of suitable tooling, eg side angle drills.
1 4 Low
Heat stress from wearing protective equipment in hot weather.
Operatives,- possible heat stress
3 4 Med Provision of drinking water, knowledge of and monitoring of heat stress
symptoms. 1 5 Low
Hypothermia from wind chill, wet conditions and static nature of work.
Operatives,- possible hypothermia
3 4 Med Provision of shelter close to the work area with warming facilities, knowledge of
and monitoring for symptoms. 1 5 Low
Vibration white finger Operatives – potential vibration white finger 2 4 Low
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives. Use modern well-maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking.
1 4 Low
Pipes freezing - contact with cold surfaces Exposure to CO2 gas (confined space hazards)
Operatives-potential for burns to exposed skin
2 5 Med Hazard awareness including confined spaces. Equipment checks before use.
1 5 Low
Exposure to high pressure water
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity -potential for burns to exposed skin
2 5 Med
Safety signs. Appropriately sized equipment. Isolation of electrical services adjacent. Protective gloves (not PVC) and other PPE. Gas monitors.
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 41
17 Plumbing & Heating
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Adequate ventilation. Specialist training.
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992(As amended 2002) • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • HSG150: Health and safety in construction • HSG168: Fire safety in construction
Training
• Manual handling
Management
• Method Statements may be required.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 42
18 Temporary Electrical Supplies
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Contact with electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High
Design in accordance with British Standards and other Regulations
Use 110 volt transformers
Supply and distribution units will be lockable and keys controlled
Suitable warning signs on supply units
Safe System of Work – limit extent of live working – Permit to work system if necessary
Installation and test by Competent operatives
Use of rubber gloves where necessary
Cables routed so as to prevent damage
Certificates to be issued after installation and test
1 5 Low
Fire / Explosion
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by asphyxiation, burns or collapse of property
3 4 Med
Check supply not overloaded
Suitable fuses or other protective devices fitted
CO2 Fire Extinguisher in vicinity
Only work in non-explosive atmosphere
1 4 Low
Damage to equipment
Operatives – risk of Damaging equipment or major injury due to use of damaged equipment
2 4 Med Correct voltage for equipment
Correct fuse or protective device fitted 1 4 Low
Trips / Falls
Operatives, other in vicinity - risk of tripping over trailing cables resulting in major injury
2 4 Med Cables and equipment routed so as to prevent trip hazards 1 4 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992(As amended 2002)
Training
• Qualified electricians or technicians trained in specific electrical installations
Management
• Method Statements may be required. • Electrical permits may be required by some clients.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 43
19 Low Voltage Electrical Works
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Contact with electricity
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High
Only qualified electricians / technicians allowed to work with electricity
Isolation of electrical supply, with system in place to ensure that other persons are unable to switch supply on
No live working
Use of cable detection equipment
No electrical work in wet / damp environments
Use of insulated tools
Installation work to be undertaken in accordance with BS7671 and other electrical standards and regulations
Close liaison with other trades
1 4 Low
Fire / Explosion
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-risk of major injuries or death
2 5 Med
Check system not overloaded
Awareness of fire risks (ie presence of gas)
Ensure adequate ventilation, either natural or forced
Fire extinguisher close to hand
Emergency procedures in place
1 5 Low
Damage to equipment
Operatives – risk of Damaging equipment or major injury due to use of damaged equipment
3 2 Low Correct voltage for equipment
Correct fuse or protective device fitted 1 2 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992(As amended 2002)
Training
• Qualified electricians or technicians trained in specific electrical installations
Management
• Method Statements may be required. • Electrical permits may be required by some clients.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 44
20 Use of Portable Electrical Equipment
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 2 Low
Use well maintained equipment.
Use correct equipment for the job.
Enforce wearing of carefully selected ear defenders.
Separate other workers and post ear protection zone signage
2 2 Low
Injury from the toolbit
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-potential injury from being struck by flying object
3 4 Med
Use the appropriate tool for the job
Ensure appropriate guarding is fitted on certain tools.
Ensure regular maintenance and cleaning undertaken
Wear eye protection.
Disconnection from the supply when changing or adjusting the toolbit.
2 4 Med
Work related upper limb disorders
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
3 2 Low
Ergonomic design of task, eg preassembly to avoid repetitious fixing with poor posture.
Good lighting.
Good quality access equipment.
2 2 Low
Fire/explosion/ electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by inhalation of smoke, fire, electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med
Use battery powered tools.
Use 110v equipment.
Regular maintenance and connection to a suitably protected supply.
Prohibit use in explosive or flammable atmosphere.
Scheme of test and inspection (ie PAT Test), including user inspection of tools, leads and any transformers or distribution boxes.
Tools to be earthed or double insulated.
Procedure for reporting damage and obtaining replacement tools.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures electrocution etc
3 5 High Restrict use to persons with sufficient maturity and never leave them unattended. 1 5 Low
Handling vibrating equipment List significant vibration tasks:
Operatives – potential vibration white finger
3 4 Med Provide system for monitoring health of Operatives.
Use modern well maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking. 1 4 Low
Dust Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for 4 3 Med
Damp down or use a vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear masks and goggles in accordance with any assessment carried out under COSHH.
2 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 45
20 Use of Portable Electrical Equipment
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
respiratory problems and eye injuries
Trips and Falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 4 Med Leads and extension cables to be routed so as to minimise likelihood of trips. 1 4 Low
Physical
• All equipment found to be defective will be switched off and reported immediately • Visual inspection of equipment before use • Only moulded socket holders are to be used
Managerial / Supervisory
• Monitoring of maintenance and use of equipment
Training
• Operatives will be trained in the precautions and safe use of electrical equipment
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 46
21 Use of Hand Tools
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Injury from the tool or material displaced by the use of the tool,
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-potential injury from flying objects
3 3 Med
Use correct tool for the job.
Wear eye protection and gloves as required.
Use Rubber sleeved chisels.
Training on use of equipment.
1 3 Low
Cuts from sharp tools, such as knives, screwdrivers or other sharp tools
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-potential for sever cuts
3 3 Med Carried, used and stored safely 1 3
Low
Work related upper limb disorders
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
2 3 Low
Ergonomic design of task, eg special tools, or use of power tools, eg electric nut runner.
Good lighting.
Good quality access equipment.
1 3
Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
3 2 Low Wear masks and goggles in accordance with any assessment carried out under
COSHH.
Damp down or use vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping
2 2
Low
Falls while using the tool Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 4 Med Only permit work at height from a suitable working platform (not a ladder unless
of short duration). 1 4
Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 5 High Lock away hand tools when not in use. 1 5
Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • HS(G) 60: Work related upper limb disorders
Supervisory / Management
• Monitoring of equipment that can deteriorate with use, to ensure they are sharpened or replaced as necessary. Monitoring to ensure equipment is used correctly.
Training
• Operatives are to be instructed in the correct method and use and in maintenance requirements at start of employment if not part of craft training.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 47
22 Use of Abrasive Wheels
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Impact injury caused by ejected particles or sparks, loss of or bursting of wheel including eye injury or contact with the wheel
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or even fatal injuries
2 5 Med
Maintenance of machine guard, wearing suitable goggles or helmet visor, gloves (in some circumstances) and safety footwear.
Inspection of wheel before use.
Selection and inspection of the correct wheel and speed
Only trained Operatives to use abrasive wheels.
1 5 Low
Fire through ignition of flammable vapours, oils, etc or sparks during cutting and grinding operations
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major injury, burns or death 2 5 Med
Good housekeeping, wearing fire resistant clothing (heavy duty cotton overalls, never use polyester), regular laundering of overalls.
Do not use in potentially explosive or flammable atmospheres.
Suitable fire extinguisher in vicinity
1 5 Low
Entanglement with rotating disc
Operatives-possible major injuries i.e. burns, cuts or amputation
2 5 Med Loose clothing and ties not worn
Long hair tied back 1 5 Low
Dropping equipment while in operation
Operatives/ other workers in vicinity -possible major injuries i.e. burns, cuts or amputation
2 5 Med
Only use while standing on firm, level ground
Wear suitable safety footwear, goggles etc 1 5 Low
Inhalation of dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 2 Med If possible, select equipment with integral dust suppression or local exhaust
ventilation.
Wear suitable face masks
1 2 Low
Working with electrical equipment
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med
Use 110 Vac Equipment
Regular maintenance and connection to a suitably protected supply.
Prohibit use in explosive or flammable atmosphere.
Scheme of test and inspection (ie PAT Test), including user inspection of tools, leads and any transformers or distribution boxes.
Tools to be earthed or double insulated.
Procedure for reporting damage and obtaining replacement tools.
1 5 Low
Contact with hazardous substances being cut List unusual substances:
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
1 2 Low
As identified by COSHH Assessment.
1 2 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 48
22 Use of Abrasive Wheels
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise induced hearing loss
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 1 Low
Wearing appropriate hearing protection and, where possible, siting the work area away from others.
1 1 Low
Vibration White Finger
Operatives – potential vibration white finger
3 3 Med
Provide system for monitoring health of Operatives.
Use modern well maintained equipment, keep hands warm, avoid smoking.
Reduced periods for operating equipment.
2 3 Low
Falls while operating the tool Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Only permit work from a suitable access platform (not a ladder).
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992(As amended 2002) • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • HSG 17 Safety in the use of abrasive wheels
Supervisory / Management
• Monitoring of wearing of eye protection and suitable use of work platforms. • Suitable storage facilities to be provided. • Records of training to be available for perusal. • This type of work lends itself to a generic method statement provided issues of how the work affects others are addressed in a site specific way
Training
• Training required by the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 49
23 Use of Circular Saws / Chop Saws
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise induced hearing loss
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 2 Low
Use well maintained equipment.
Use correct equipment for the job.
Enforce wearing of carefully selected ear defenders.
Separate other workers and post ear protection zone signage
2 2 Low
Injury from the rotating saw blade (ie contact, ejection)
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or even fatal injuries
3 5 High
Ensure appropriate guarding is well maintained and used.
Ensure regular maintenance and cleaning undertaken
Wear eye protection.
Disconnection from the supply when changing the blade.
1 5 Low
Entanglement Operatives-possible major injuries i.e. burns, cuts or amputation
3 4 Med No loose clothing worn
Long hair tied back 1 4 Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries
4 3 Med Damp down or use a vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping, wear masks and
goggles in accordance with any assessment carried out under COSHH. 2 3 Low
Trips and Falls
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / general public-potential injury from cables resulting in major injury
3 4 Med Leads and extension cables to be routed so as to minimise likelihood of trips. 1 4 Low
Inadvertent movement of equipment
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-potential for machine to move leading to possible major
3 4 Med Use on firm level surface with adequate space 1 4 Low
Work related upper limb disorders
Operatives – potential vibration damage
3 2 Low
Ergonomic design of task, e.g. preassembly to avoid repetitious fixing with poor posture.
Good lighting.
Good quality access equipment.
2 2 Low
Fire/explosion/ electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major injury, burns or death
2 5 Med
Use 110v equipment.
Regular maintenance and connection to a suitably protected supply.
Prohibit use in explosive or flammable atmosphere.
Scheme of test and inspection (i.e. PAT Test), including user inspection of
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 50
23 Use of Circular Saws / Chop Saws
Hazard Those At Risk
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
equipment.
User/other person injury
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or fatal injuries from improper use of tool
3 5 High
Never permit taking up contact pressure with the hand.
Restrict use to mature, trained people who are authorised in writing and are over 18 years old and never leave them unattended.
Unload when not in use.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or fatal injuries from improper use of tool
3 5 High Restrict use to persons with sufficient maturity and never leave them unattended. 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992(As amended 2002) • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002
Managerial / Supervisory
• Monitoring of maintenance and use of equipment
Training
• Operatives will be trained in the precautions and safe use of electrical equipment
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 51
24 Use of Cartridge Operated Tools
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med
Enforce wearing of carefully selected ear defenders.
Separate other workers and display ear protection zone signage.
Job rotation.
1 2 Low
Tool misfiring or jamming, Nails or other material (ie splinters) deflecting at high speed during firing
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or fatal injuries due to being struck by high speed materials
4 4 High
Follow approved procedure for misfires.
Regular maintenance and cleaning at manufacturer recommended intervals.
Use of cartridges and nails produced by the manufacturer of the tool.
Wear suitable eye protection.
Examine base material before fixing and carry out trial fix with low power setting.
Do not fix into pre-stressed (eg floor beams) or hydraulically pressed concrete (eg kerbs).
1 4 Low
Falls while operating the tool Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Only permit work at height from a suitable scaffold (not a ladder). 1 5 Low
Fire, explosion, misuse
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major injury, burns or death
3 5 High
Prohibit use in confined spaces and operate where appropriate under the control of a hot works permit.
Do not permit use in the presence of flammable vapours.
Storage of tools in lockable steel lockers.
Strict accounting for issue of consumables and spent cartridges and gas cannisters. Spent or partly used cartridges are to be returned to the supplier.
Note: large quantities must be licensed by the police in accordance with Class 6, Division 1 of the Explosives Act 1875.
1 5 Low
User/other person injury
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or fatal injuries from improper use of tool
3 5 High
Never permit taking up contact pressure with the hand.
Restrict use to mature, trained people who are authorised in writing and are over 18 years old and never leave them unattended.
Unload when not in use.
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Confined Spaces Regulations 1997 • PM14 Safety in the use of cartridge tools, HSE (out of print).
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 52
24 Use of Cartridge Operated Tools
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Training
• Training required by the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 can be provided by manufacturers or hire companies.
Management
• Require copies of training records and ensure they are relevant. Monitor the use of eye and noise protection and suitable use of work platforms. Strict control of consumables.
Recommendations
• This type of work lends itself to a generic method statement provided issues of how the work affects others are addressed in a site specific way.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 53
25 Use of Hydraulic & Pneumatic Powered Equipment
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med
Enforce wearing of carefully selected ear defenders.
Separate other workers and display ear protection zone signage.
Job rotation.
1 2 Low
Injury from the cutting tool Operatives – potential for major injury due to contact with cutting tool
3 4 Med
Use the appropriate equipment for the job
Operatives trained in the correct use of the equipment
Ensure appropriate guarding is fitted.
Ensure regular maintenance undertaken at manufacturer-recommended intervals
Wear eye protection.
Disconnection from the supply when changing or adjusting the cutting tool
Store machine in appropriate case when not in use
1 4 Low
High pressure hydraulic fluid / air ejection
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible injection of hydraulic fluid or air into persons
2 5 Med Ensure equipment maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions Operative to carry out before use checks for signs of leaks
1 5 Low
Contact with other services
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med
Survey site before starting work
Use detectors to detect hidden services
Use earthed equipment
Isolate services if risk of contact exists
1 5 Low
Dust
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential for respiratory problems and eye injuries 4 2 Med
Use equipment with integral dust extractor
Wear P2 respirator and goggles
Use a vacuum cleaner instead of sweeping
Damping down of substrate with water mister as appropriate
Where possible area to be closed to persons other than operative
Area warning notices as required form site RA
1 2 Low
Trip Hazards Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / general public
3 4 Med Leads and extension cables to be routed so as to minimise likelihood of trips. 1 4 Low
HAVS from vibration Operatives – potential 3 3 Med
Vibration magnitude for this item is 5m/s2
Using an exposure calculator - use for 4hrs within a 8hour period 1 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 54
25 Use of Hydraulic & Pneumatic Powered Equipment
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
vibration white finger Therefore each operative to be limited to 1hr continuous use and max 3hrs within 8hrs period to maximise exposure allowance.
Work related whole body and upper limb disorder
Operatives-potential for work related upper limb and whole body vibration
3 4 Med
Ergonomic design of task ie pre-assembly to avoid repetitious fixing with poor posture
Good lighting
Job rotation
Good quality access equipment
1 4 Low
Falls while operating the tool
Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Site specific risk assessment to assess risks and identify the most appropriate equipment for working at height
Use safe system of work for use of equipment for working at height (ie mobile scaffold tower, MEWP)
Use of exclusion zones by barriers
Use of well maintained equipment by competent operatives
Hard hats to be worn
1 5 Low
Fire, explosion, misuse
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major injury, burns or death
3 5 High
Prohibit use in confined spaces and operate where appropriate under the control of a hot works permit.
Do not permit use in the presence of flammable vapours.
Storage of tools in lockable steel lockers.
Strict accounting for issue of consumables and spent cartridges and gas cannisters. Spent or partly used cartridges are to be returned to the supplier.
Note: large quantities must be licensed by the police in accordance with Class 6, Division 1 of the Explosives Act 1875.
1 5 Low
User/other person injury
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible major or fatal injuries from improper use of tool
3 5 High
Never permit taking up contact pressure with the hand.
Restrict use to mature, trained people who are authorised in writing and are over 18 years old and never leave them unattended.
Unload when not in use.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised use Operatives 2 5 Med Remove keys when not in machine and lock up.
Parking in compounds. 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Pressure Systems and Safety Regulations 2000 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 55
25 Use of Hydraulic & Pneumatic Powered Equipment
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• • Noise at Work Regulations 1989 • HS(G) 60: Work related upper limb disorders • HS(G) 39 : Compressed air safety
Management
• Compressors and power packs may require test certificates (under Pressure Systems and Safety Regulations)
Training
• Training on work equipment as required by PUWER • Information and instruction about HAVS and symptoms/preventative measures
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 56
26 Use of Ladders
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med
Training in safe manual handling techniques. Provide clear access routes where ladders are carried or accessed from. Provide assistance with heavy ladders. Provide training in safe erection of ladders. Select lightweight ladders where appropriate.
1 3 Low
Unauthorised movement of ladder
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Use correct ladder for job (roof ladder to have appropriate ridge hook and wheels).
Provide structure to secure ladder, or foot the ladder. Provide rigid ladder. Prohibit use in strong winds. Provide level base or ladder-levelling device.
1 5
Low
Electrocution due to contact with services
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Survey for overhead power lines. Agree safe system of work. Use extension ladders to avoid contact and sheath or isolate power supplies.
1 5
Low
Fall of material
Operatives, General Public – falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Establish and police exclusion zones beneath work at height. Consider alternative to a ladder (ie scaffold, tower). Provide hooks or tool belt to ensure one hand remains on ladder. Wear helmet.
1 5
Low
Falls from height
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public – potential falls leading to major injury or death 3 5 High
Provide safe access routes. Good housekeeping Good lighting. Suitable footwear. Ladder to extend at least 1m above step of point (also applicable when gaining
access to roof ladders) Trained user, with no history of alcohol or substance abuse. Ladder of sufficient length to ensure no use of top four rungs. Prohibit use in inclement weather. Vertical ladders to have safety hoops to British Standard specification and
consider use of safety harnesses and continuous lines.
1 5
Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High Remove ladder when not in use or affix plank to lower half. 1 5
Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 57
26 Use of Ladders
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Structural failure of ladder
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public – potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med
Regular form inspection and record (ie 6 monthly). User inspection. Prohibit any adaptation of a ladder to support a plank, eg ladder cripples. Use Class 1 or EN131 Ladders
1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • HSG150 Health and Safety in Construction • CIS40 General Access Scaffolds and Ladders • BS1129: Specification for portable timber ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging • BS2037: Specification for portable aluminium ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging • BS EN131: Ladders • INDG445: Safe use of ladders & stepladders: a brief guide
Training
• All users (correct method of climbing, inspection, erection, lowering and working from).
Management
• Daily monitoring by site manager. • Site specific risk assessment required for working at height
Recommendations
• All roofwork from a ladder requires a specific risk assessment. As a general principle, working from a ladder will therefore require a job-specific risk assessment. • No ladder to exceed 9m.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 58
27 Use of Step Ladders
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Training in safe manual handling techniques. Provide clear access routes Use lightweight step ladders where appropriate.
2 3 Low
Unauthorised movement of step ladder
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High
Use correct ladder for job. Put step ladder facing onto work area (not sideways) Ensure step ladder is maintained and rigid. Provide level, firm base
1 5 Low
Electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Survey for power lines in the vicinity.
1 5 Low
Fall of material
Operatives, General Public – falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Establish and police exclusion zones. Consider alternative to a ladder. Ie hop ups Provide hooks or tool belt to ensure one hand remains on ladder. Wear helmet.
1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 5 High
Provide safe access routes. Good housekeeping Good lighting. Suitable footwear. Trained user, with no history of alcohol or substance abuse. Ladder of sufficient height so the hand can hold top of ladder.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
General public, children – major injuries through falls, contact with equipment etc
3 5 High Remove ladder when not in use 1 5 Low
Structural failure of step ladder
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public – potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Regular inspection. User inspection. Use Class 1 or EN131 Ladders
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 59
27 Use of Step Ladders
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • HSG150 Health and Safety in Construction • CIS40 General Access Scaffolds and Ladders • BS1129: Specification for portable timber ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging • BS2037: Specification for portable aluminium ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging • BS EN131: Ladders • INDG445: Safe use of ladders & stepladders: a brief guide
Training
• All users (correct method of climbing, inspection, erection, lowering and working from).
Management
• Daily monitoring by site manager. • Site specific risk assessment required for working at height
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 60
28 Use of Mobile Scaffold Towers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height, fall of material, collapse of the scaffold, overturn of the scaffold
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
4 5 High
Safe Working Load (SWL) to be marked on equipment and adhered to. Safe system of work for erection, alteration, movement and dismantling based on
the erector having a copy of the manufacturer’s instruction manual. Use of top and mid guard rails on all platforms Use of toe boards on all working platforms Handover and in-service inspection (legally required if tower is static for more
than a week), erection and alteration by persons using only manufacturer’s approved components.
Bombing (throwing materials off the scaffold) to be prohibited. No use of chutes. Monitoring of weather conditions (if outside) and dismantling where appropriate. Careful inspection of ground condition before erection and maintenance of good
ground conditions. Wear safety helmets. Access to tower by manufacturer’s ladders or stairs. Visitors & General Public to be excluded from area below scaffold.
1 5 Low
Unsafe movement of the tower
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Brakes to be applied, tools and persons removed before movement, dismantling
in accordance with training. 1 5 Low
Persons or vehicles colliding with the scaffold
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Lighting, provision of cones or barriers around the scaffolding 1 5 Low
Unauthorised access to the tower
Children / General Public– potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Removal or boarding up of the first lift access ladder. Display warning notices.
1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Use safe system of work for carrying and lifting components 2 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 61
28 Use of Mobile Scaffold Towers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Contact with overhead services
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Survey site before erection, agree with cable owner to remove power from cable 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Prefabricated Aluminium Scaffolding Manufacturer’s Association (PASMA) Code of Practice • Tower Manufacturers Instruction Leaflet
Training
• Erectors should be in possession of proof of training • Users should have received basic instruction (ie a toolbox talk) on safe working practices based on CIS10 as a minimum
Management/Supervision
• Constant monitoring to ensure towers always comply with manufacturer’s instructions. Also wearing of hard hats needs regular monitoring. • Site specific risk assessment required for working at height
Recommendations
• Deviations from manufacturer’s recommendations requires a specific risk assessment and method statement.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 62
29 Use of Staging Systems
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height, fall of material, collapse of the staging system
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
4 5 High
All working at height to be properly planned and supervised by trained and competent persons
Staging system to be erected, altered and dismantled by trained and competent operatives only
Use of purpose made staging boards, not timber boards
Trestles / staging boards compliant with BS 2037 Class 1
Safe Working Load (SWL) to be marked on equipment and adhered to
Use of top and mid guard rails on open edge of staging board if above 0.5m high
Width of staging to be adequate for job being undertaken
Careful inspection of ground condition before erection and maintenance of good surface conditions
Wear safety helmets
Visitors & General Public to be excluded from area below trestles
No use of boxes or other means to increase the height on the trestles
1 5 Low
Unsafe movement of the staging system
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Trestles to be properly erected and used on firm level surface 1 5 Low
Persons or vehicles colliding with the staging system
Operatives others in vicinity – potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Lighting, provision of cones or barriers around the staging system 1 5 Low
Unauthorised access to the staging system
Children / General Public– potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Securing or dismantling of staging system when not in use. 1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Use safe system of work for carrying and lifting components 2 3 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 63
29 Use of Staging Systems
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Specification for portable timber ladders, trestles and lightweight staging British Standard BS 2037:1990
Training
• Users should have received basic instruction (ie a toolbox talk) on safe working practices as a minimum
Management/Supervision
• Constant monitoring to ensure trestles are used correctly Also wearing of hard hats needs regular monitoring. • Site specific risk assessment required for working at height
Recommendations
•.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 64
30 Use of Access Scaffolding
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Falls from height, fall of material
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity– potential falls leading to major injury or death
4 5 High
Handover and in-service weekly inspection, erection by certificated scaffolders.
Safe system of work for erection, including use of safety harnesses.
Bombing (throwing materials off the scaffold) to be prohibited.
Use of top rail, mid rail and toeboards in accordance with statutory requirements
Minimal gaps between boards
Monitoring of weather conditions and re-inspection where appropriate.
Provision of fans, brickguards or sheeting.
Visitors & General Public to be excluded from area below scaffold.
1 5 Low
Collapse of the scaffold.
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity– potential falls leading to major injury or death
3 5 High Alteration by scaffolders only. 1 5 Low
Boards flying off in windy weather
Operatives / general public – major injury or death caused by falling objects
2 5 Med Boards to be secured as required 1 5 Low
Persons or vehicles colliding with the scaffold
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity– potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med
Careful inspection of ground condition before erection.
Design of the scaffold if additional loads imposed, eg sheeting, hoist
Capping of exposed tube ends, taping of exposed nuts, lighting approved by the Local Authority, provision of cones, painted timber baulks and sleeved standards.
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access to the scaffolding
Children / General Public– potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med
Removal or boarding up of the first lift access ladder.
The difficult access to the rear of the building will also prevent access.
Possible alarming of system
1 5 Low
Manual handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, particularly back injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 3 Med Use aluminium tubes or system scaffold components, provide lifting equipment
to raise materials for the scaffolder. 2 3 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 65
30 Use of Access Scaffolding
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• Work at Height Regulations 2005 • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HS(G)150 Health and safety in construction. • HS(G) 168 Fire Safety in Construction Work • BS 5973 Code of practice for access and working scaffolds and special scaffold structures in steel. (NOW REVOKED) • NASC Guide to Good Practice for Scaffolding with Tubes and Fittings (TG20:13) • BS EN 12811-1 : 2003 Scaffolds - performance requirements and general design • Cradle Riggers and Users guide to safe suspended platforms (Construction Industry Press S81) • CITB Guide to practical scaffolding (CE509) • GE 700 notes 5 part 1 National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) The use of fall arrest equipment whilst erecting, altering and dismantling scaffolding SG4
Training
• Scaffolders should be in possession of proof of training (Basic Scaffolder, Advanced Scaffolder), including use of safety harnesses. • Workers should be made aware that alteration of scaffolds or removal of ties can only be undertaken by competent scaffolders on receipt of specific authority. • Supervisors should be fully trained in scaffold inspection. • Basic training in the form of tool-box talks should be provided to all workers to enable them to identify scaffold components and defects in scaffolds.
Management
• A detailed specification is required for scaffolding to ensure it is erected in accordance with NASC guidelines and that it provides edge protection where required, working platforms positioned at the correct height for the user, ladder access points intelligently positioned and suitable loading bays. Wearing of helmets needs regular monitoring.
Recommendations
• The method statement should detail sequence for dismantling as well as erection of scaffolding.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 66
31 Use of Genie Lift
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Equipment overturning/failing
Operatives – major injuries or fatalities as a result of being struck by falling equipment
3 5 High
The planning, control and supervision of all lifting operations to be under the responsibility of a competent and experienced person
Matters to be considered will include access for the lifting equipment, surface conditions, overhead restrictions, proximity of lifting equipment to loading position, loads to be within safe working load of lifting equipment, thorough examination certificate for lifting equipment to be up to date, test certificates for slinging equipment to be up to date, competency of lifting equipment operators
Monitor lifting equipment operations whilst lifting
Competent person to organise and take responsibility for the lifting operation
Site survey to highlight pace issues and other obstructions in the building
Follow equipment manufacturer’s leaflet
Do not use damaged equipment and report any faults immediately
1 5 Low
Materials falling during lifting operations
Operatives – major injuries or fatalities as a result of being struck by falling load/materials
3 5 High
Loads to be positioned so that centre of gravity is well with the forks / platform
Prevent people from entering area below the load being lifted
Work area to have adequate space such that load being lifted does not make contact with another object/surface and falls as a result
If load being supported at either end, then operatives to be positioned well away from load in case of a fall
Lifting equipment must be examined and tested as prescribed by the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER Regulations)
The equipment must be maintained in an efficient state, working order and good repair
The lifting equipment should be inspected before use and formally at least once a week by the operator or other competent person in accordance with manufacturers' instructions
All loads to be lifted to be within the safe working load of the lifting equipment
Do not move equipment with a raised load, except for minor positioning
Never leave the equipment unattended with a supported load
1 5 Low
Manual handling of loads onto genie lifts
Operatives – major injuries as a result of being struck by falling load/materials
3 4 Med
Team lifting onto genie lift
Use of mechanisation to move load to as close as possible to front of lifting equipment
Limit weight to ideally 25kg per person (or limit at which the operative is comfortable lifting
1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 67
31 Use of Genie Lift
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Safety footwear worn
Gloves worn as required to prevent slipping loads
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Reference to Equipment Instruction Leaflet
Managerial / Supervisory
• Organisation and control prior to and during all lifting operations. • Method statements to include details or on site briefing of how all lifting operations are organised/controlled on site.
Training
• Training / briefing in the use of the equipment
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 68
32 Use of Forklift Truck / Telehandler
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Fall of material from forks of FLT
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being struck by falling object
3 5 High
Driver trained in safe driving techniques and instructed not to lift over people, Driver in strengthened cab, Safe Working Load (SWL) not exceeded, Trained, authorised drivers Check condition of surface as part of daily/weekly inspection
1 5 Low
FLT overturning, particularly on sloping ground
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
3 5 High
Safe system of work (in accordance with FLT driver training), FLT suitable for work undertaken, Clean surfaces in good condition, and mostly on the level except for slope at
rear Speed limit kept low - speed limiters installed FLT tyres in good condition, Safe Working Load not exceeded, Loads are not lifted high, Roll over protection system and seat belt worn when risk of toppling exists Trained, authorised drivers
1 5 Low
Contact with moving vehicles or pedestrians
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to contact with a moving vehicle
3 5 High
FLT fitted with horn, reversing alarm and flashing light – need daily checks to confirm they are working
FLT Warning signs at site as required Limit traffic in FLT operations area, Limit number of pedestrians using area Optimise layout of site No unaccompanied visitors on site Adequate lighting in area Visitors enter premises through front entrance High-viz clothing worn by everyone on site
1 5 Low
Collision with structures
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to collapse of the structure
3 5 High Adequate lighting, Staff training and awareness Protection installed in vulnerable areas as required
1 5 Low
Falls from machine Operatives – potential falls leading to major injury or death
2 5 Med Provision of suitable non-slip footwear Handholds fitted and non-slip materials used on FLT, FLT kept clean,
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 69
32 Use of Forklift Truck / Telehandler
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Seat belt fitted Passengers prohibited from riding on FLT
Potential failure of lifting shovels and cage when in use
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to falling people or being struck by falling object
2 5 Med Ensure all “lifting accessories” and examined by a competent company every 6
months in accordance with statutory requirements (speak to FLT maintenance company)
1 5 Low
Unauthorised access
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High Keys removed when FLT not in use FLT parked in safe area
1 5 Low
High pressure fluid ejection
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible injection of hydraulic fluid into persons
2 4 Med Maintenance in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions 1 4 Low
Bad Weather
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
2 5 Med Outside surfaces cleared of ice/snow before FLT is used 1 5 Low
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of machine
2 5 Med
Extent of maintenance undertaken by drivers is limited, All other maintenance, including tyre repair, is undertaken by specialist
mechanics Ensure daily checklist is fitted to FLTs in a prominent location Ensure records of daily checks maintained
1 5 Low
Drivers
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by
3 5 High
Drivers have full driving licence, Drivers have certificate of competence Manager checks competence of FLT drives Drivers medically fit,
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 70
32 Use of Forklift Truck / Telehandler
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
people being run over by our vehicles/plant
Drivers instructed to report any medical conditions/ medication that may affect their ability to operate the FLT safely
Consider refresher training for FLT drivers at periodic intervals (i.e. every 3 to 5 years)
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Approved Code of Practice and Supplementary Guidance "Rider Operated Lift Trucks- operator training". ISBN 0 7176 2455 2 (HSE) • Safety in Working with Lift trucks HSG(6)
Management
• Ensure suitable equipment hired for material and site conditions • Ensure risk assessment undertaken and forklift truck operations planned before starting work on site – ensure drivers are fully briefed
Training
• Drivers must have up to date forklift truck licence and be medically fit
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 71
33 Use of 360 degree Excavator
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Overturn of machine
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
3 5 High
A induction provide awareness of any serious layout hazards and any speed limits.
Provide stop blocks for machines approaching the edge of an excavation.
Provide bog mats for working on unstable surfaces.
Wear seatbelts.
1 5 Low
Contact with moving machines or pedestrians
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant 3 5 High
Machinery movements to be under the control of a qualified banksman/slinger.
Separation of traffic from pedestrian routes.
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
Minimise reversing movements and follow site traffic arrangements in the health and safety plan including adequate temporary lighting.
Exclude all people who are not directly involved in the work of the machine from the working area.
Use flashing beacon and horn.
Maintain as a minimum 600mm clearance between the machine and any fixed structure.
Ensure that all workers have an agreed system for attracting the driver's attention before entering the danger zone.
If driver's view of pedestrians is obscured display warning signs
Reversing alarms.
1 5 Low
Fall of material from bucket or forks/failure of lifting equipment
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public– falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High
Inspection and tests required by LOLER*.
Defects reporting book.
No lifting over people or carriage of loads on the highway, drivers of vehicles being loaded to stay within strengthened cabs or away from work area.
Provision of automatic safe load indicator or marking maximum safe working load (SWL) at maximum reach.
Manufacturer's handbook in cab.
Prohibit use of fork attachments (provide fork lift truck).
1 5 Low
Collision with plant or vehicles during mechanical handling
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High
Specific site rules to identify where men are to take refuge during some mechanical handling operations.
Use qualified banksman/slinger
Purpose made attachment points and tested slings or chains or fork attachments used within SWL of machine.
1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 72
33 Use of 360 degree Excavator
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 2 Low Provision and enforced wearing of high quality ear defenders during hydraulic
breaker duties. 2 2 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
2 3 Low
Provide safe access routes.
Good housekeeping.
Good lighting.
1 3 Low
Falls from the machine Operatives – potential falls leading to minor or major injury
3 4 Med
Provide footwear with good grip.
Install handholds and non-slip materials to all areas of the machine for which access is required and clean regularly.
Prohibit passengers unless seats are provided.
1 4 Low
High Pressure hydraulic fluid ejection
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible injection of hydraulic fluid into persons
1 5 Low Maintenance in accordance with manufacturers instructions. 1 5 Low
Weather
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High Suspend work during conditions causing poor visibility or loss of steering. 1 5 Low
Contact with underground or overhead services
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
3 5 High Remove/disconnect/move services or work with them restricted with chains.
Carry out physical survey to identify locations of all buried services and limit dig. 1 5 Low
Whole body vibration
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
2 4 Med
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives.
Use and maintain ergonomic adjustable seating and ensure drivers are aware of how to adjust and use it.
Maintain cab and chassis suspension and maintain main routes as free of bumps as possible.
Allow time to travel at appropriate speed over rough ground.
1 4 Low
Fire Operatives, others in vicinity – potential major 2 5 Med
Ensure fire extinguisher in cab
Ensure operatives have appropriate information & training. 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 73
33 Use of 360 degree Excavator
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
injury, burns or death
Electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med Provide instruction in methods of jump starting flat batteries. 1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
2 5 Med
Remove keys when not in machine and lock up.
Parking in compounds with security clamps or immobilisers.
Secure detachable cab covers.
1 5 Low
Manual Handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
3 4 Med Training in safe manual handling techniques
Provide points of attachment on all plant to facilitate mechanical handling 1 4 Low
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of machine
2 5 Med Driver maintenance restricted.
All other maintenance including tyre repair only by specialist mechanics. 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 • HS(G) 47: Avoiding danger from buried services • HS(G) 144 Safe use of vehicles in construction work • HS(G) 150: Health and safety in construction • HS(G) 151: Protecting the public your next move • BS 6913: Operation and maintenance of earthmoving machinery
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 74
33 Use of 360 degree Excavator
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
• BS EN 474: Earthmoving machinery — safety • GS 6: Avoidance of danger from overhead services.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 75
34 Use of Dumper Trucks
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Overturn of machine
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
3 5 High
At induction provide awareness of any serious layout hazards and any speed limits.
Provide stop blocks for machines approaching the edge of an excavation.
Wear seatbelts.
Ensure ROPS (Roll over protection systems) fitted
1 5 Low
Contact with moving machines or pedestrians
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High
Separation of traffic from pedestrian routes.
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
Minimise reversing movements and follow site traffic arrangements in the health and safety plan including adequate temporary lighting.
Exclude all people who are not directly involved in the work of the machine from the working area.
Use flashing beacon and horn.
Do not overload bucket to impair visibility.
Reversing alarms.
1 5 Low
Fall of material from bucket
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public– falling objects leading to major injuries or fatalities
3 5 High Do not overload bucket
Exclude others from work area when loading or dumping– if in doubt use a banksman
1 5 Low
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
3 2 Low Provision and enforced wearing of high quality ear defenders during hydraulic
breaker duties. 2 2 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
2 3 Low
Provide safe access routes.
Good housekeeping.
Good lighting.
2 3 Low
Falls from the machine Operatives – potential falls leading to minor or major injury
3 4 Med Provide footwear with good grip.
Prohibit passengers unless seats are provided. 1 4 Low
High Pressure hydraulic fluid ejection
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity-possible injection of hydraulic fluid into
2 5 Med Maintenance in accordance with manufacturers instructions. 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 76
34 Use of Dumper Trucks
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
persons
Weather
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High Suspend work during conditions causing poor visibility or loss of steering. 1 5 Low
Whole body vibration
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
3 4 Med
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives.
Use and maintain ergonomic adjustable seating and ensure drivers are aware of how to adjust and use it.
Maintain cab and chassis suspension and maintain main routes as free of bumps as possible.
Allow time to travel at appropriate speed over rough ground.
1 4 Low
Electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med Provide instruction in methods of jump starting flat batteries. 1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
2 5 Med Remove keys when not in machine and lock up.
Parking in compounds. 1 5 Low
Manual Handling
Operatives – possible musculo-skeletal injuries, sprains, strains, cuts, fractures etc
1 4 Low Training in safe manual handling techniques 1 4 Low
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of machine
2 5 Med Driver maintenance restricted.
All other maintenance including tyre repair only by specialist mechanics. 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 77
34 Use of Dumper Trucks
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Control of Vibrations at Work Regulations 2005 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 • INDG242 Control of Vibrations at Work – employers guide • HS(G) 144 Safe use of vehicles in construction work • HS(G) 150: Health and safety in construction • HS(G) 151: Protecting the public your next move • BS 6913: Operation and maintenance of earthmoving machinery • BS EN 474: Earthmoving machinery — safety
Management • The possession of a valid training certificate is not a guarantee for safe working practices. Every driver should be monitored and the site manager regularly driver's licences.
Training • Machine operator.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 78
35 Use of Ride-on-Rollers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Overturn of machine
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
3 5 High
At induction provide awareness of any serious layout hazards
Provide stop blocks for machines approaching the edge of an excavation.
Wear seatbelts.
Ensure ROPS (Roll over protection systems) fitted
1 5 Low
Contact with moving machines or pedestrians
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High
Separation of traffic from pedestrian routes.
Wearing of high visibility clothing on site.
Exclude all people who are not directly involved in the work of the machine from the working area.
Use flashing beacon and horn.
Reversing alarms.
1 5 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
2 3 Low Ensure access steps onto machine, handles etc are present and clean 2 3 Low
Falls from the machine Operatives – potential falls leading to minor or major injury
3 4 Med Provide footwear with good grip.
Prohibit passengers. 1 4 Low
Electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med Provide instruction in methods of jump starting flat batteries. 1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being run over by our vehicles/plant
2 5 Med Remove keys when not in machine and lock up.
Parking in compounds. 1 5 Low
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of
2 5 Med Driver maintenance restricted.
All other maintenance including tyre repair only by specialist mechanics. 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 79
35 Use of Ride-on-Rollers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
machine
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 • HS(G) 144 Safe use of vehicles in construction work • HS(G) 150: Health and safety in construction • HS(G) 151: Protecting the public your next move
Management • The possession of a valid training certificate is not a guarantee for safe working practices. Every driver should be monitored and the site manager regularly driver's licences.
Training • Machine operator.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 80
36 Use of Compactor / Wacker Plate
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Overturn of machine
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
2 5 Med
At induction provide awareness of any serious layout hazards.
Provide stop blocks for compactor used close to the edge of an excavation.
Do not use on excessively sloping ground – refer to manufacturer’s instructions for safe slope limits
Opertate in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions
1 5 Low
Contact with moving machines or pedestrians
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being struck by our vehicles/plant
3 5 High
Wearing of high visibility clothing.
Exclude all people who are not directly involved in the work of the machine from the working area.
If in doubt, use banksman to keep a look out for others
1 5 Low
Roll over feet Operatives-possible major crush injury to feet
3 4 Med Wearing of safety boots 1 4 Low
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med Provision and enforced wearing of high quality ear defenders during hydraulic
breaker duties. 2 2 Low
Slips, trips and falls
Operatives, others in vicinity – possible minor or major injury as a result of falling over
3 3 Med
Provide safe access routes.
Good housekeeping.
Good lighting.
1 3 Low
Hand/Arm vibration
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
4 4 High
Provide system for monitoring health of operatives.
Use suitable well maintained equipment.
Use of low vibration equipment
Obtain information on levels of vibration emitted by equipment, and ensure operatives do not exceed the daily exposure.
1 4 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury or death by people being struck by our plant
2 5 Med Remove keys when not in machine and lock up.
Parking in compounds. 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 81
36 Use of Compactor / Wacker Plate
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of machine
2 5 Med Operator maintenance restricted.
All other maintenance by specialist mechanics. 1 5 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HS(G) 150: Health and safety in construction
Management
The possession of a valid training certificate is not a guarantee for safe working practices. Every operator should be monitored and the site manager should have sight of the operator’s certificate.
Training
• Machine operator.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 82
37 Use of Cement Mixers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Noise
Operatives, others in vicinity – potential hearing loss in long term, tinnitus etc
4 2 Med Wearing ear defenders if working close to machine 2 2 Low
Overturn of machine
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to being crushed
2 5 Med
Position on firm, level ground
Operate in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions 1 5 Low
Unauthorised use
Operatives, Other workers in vicinity, General Public - major injury by people being struck or contacting our plant
2 5 Med Disconnect from supply when not in use
Keep inside secure compound 1 5 Low
Electrocution
Operatives, others in vicinity – risk of death by electrocution or explosion
2 5 Med
Use of 110v supply
PAT test every three months
If 240 volt equipment used, then ensure RCD used in circuit
1 5 Low
Entanglement
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public- major injury or death due to entanglement with machine
3 5 High
Operatives to be instructed in safe use of machine
No cleaning when machine is in operation
Do not allow shovel, arms etc. to enter drum.
No loose clothing or jewellery to be worn when using machine
1 5 Low
Contact with cement
Operatives, others in vicinity – for harm refer to COSHH assessments
2 2 Low
COSHH assessment to be undertaken
Operatives to wear appropriate clothing to minimise contact with cement (ie impervious gloves, full length trousers)
Washing facilities at site (including warm water and soap)
Operatives to be encouraged to use barrier creams, moisturisers etc
1 2 Low
Maintenance
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-possible major injury or death due to failure of
2 5 Med Operator maintenance restricted.
All other maintenance by specialist company 1 5 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 83
37 Use of Cement Mixers
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
machine
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2015 • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 • Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HS(G) 150: Health and safety in construction
Management
• Monitoring use of equipment
Training
• Machine operator.
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 84
38 Use of Vibrating Equipment (Risk of HAVS)
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Hand/Arm Vibration Syndrome
Operatives – potential vibration white finger
3 4 Med
Use of suitable, well maintained equipment
Selection of equipment with lowest levels of vibration – see manufacturers details about the equipment
Obtain information on levels of vibration emitted by equipment, and ensure operatives do not exceed the daily exposure value (5 ms-2) – Refer to HSE calculator website or manufacturer’s data
If necessary, use HSE’s vibration exposure calculator - available at www.hse.gov.uk/vibration/vibcalc.xls
Gloves and facilities available to keep hands warm
Health surveillance
Information and training to operatives about the condition, the causes and control measures.
1 4 Low
Work related upper limb disorder
Operatives-possible possible musculo-skeletal injuries, nerve or muscle damage
3 4 Med
Ergonomic design of task ie pre-assembly to avoid repetitious fixing with poor posture
Good lighting
Job rotation
Good quality access equipment
1 4 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2012 • HS(G) 60: Work related upper limb disorders • HS(G) 88: Hand-arm vibration
Management
• Selection / procurement of equipment with lowest levels of vibration • Implementation of Health Surveillance programme
Training
• Information and instruction about HAVS and symptoms/preventative measures
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 85
39 General Manual Handling Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Injuries can be caused by the Task, Individual, Load, Environment or an amalgamation of these hazards Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias
Operatives, Third parties, damage to load, damage to property Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias
3 4 Med
Eliminate Manual Handling activity completely Use suitable and sufficient mechanical aids to transport load (ie trolley, barrow) Deliver close to work place Reduce distance of travel Reduce load overall size and weight Increase number of people to lift load (one person in charge) Refer to site specific risk assessment for manual handling tasks with
significant risks
1 4 Low
Hazards associated with LOAD
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Where possible heavy loads are to be kept to a minimum or reduced in overall weight – HSE guidance on Max loads to be lifted per person: Male = 25kg Female = 16kg
Is the load bulky / unwieldy – Seek assistance if handler can not see route of travel or load larger than 750mm square.
Is the load difficult to grasp due to no handles, sharp, slippy, rounded – wear correct PPE gloves for type of load, use slings.
Ensure the load will not shift or move inside its packaging Is the load weight evenly distributed – Lift with heavier side to body
1 4 Low
Hazards associated with TASK
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Inspect route of travel, is it excessive, greater than 10m, if so incorporate rest break.
Keep load close into the body – Move any restrictions that keep handler away from the load.
Reduce stress to lower back - Do not twist while holding load. Do not stoop or bend - To lift load bend at knees. Reduce the height the load has to be lifted too – heavy items to be stacked near
floor. Keep pushing or pulling of load to a minimum - Keep extremities clear of
obstructions reducing entrapment. Precise positioning may require the operative to be in a more awkward position,
use additional person to assist.
1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 86
39 General Manual Handling Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Hazards associated with ENVIRONMENT
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Ensure that there is adequate room to manoeuvre load. Ensure floor is not slippery or uneven. Check that any change in height during transit route suitable for access with load. Ensure weather conditions do not effect task ie high wind applying additional
force to load been carried or wet weather increasing slip hazard. Ensure that there is enough lighting in the area to undertake the task safely.
1 4 Low
Hazards associated with INDIVIDUAL
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Handler must have had Manual Handling Training – associated with the type of loads they will lift.
Ensure that the task does not stretch the handlers physically capability. Do not lift load if: (Must be reported to supervisor)
a. Handler a pregnant female. b. If handlers present state of health poor
Wear the appropriate PPE: Including footwear, gloves, goggles, head protection
1 4 Low
Other Factors
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Ensure that manual handling task is not hindered by clothing or PPE worn. Ensure that hazards are not increased due to tenant interaction Ensure any outside influences such as other operatives / transport / area use
does not increase the danger to handler
1 4 Low
Hazards associated with poor lifting technique
Operatives, Injuries include; Abrasions, Cuts, Strains / Sprains, Crushes, Muscular skeletal, Fracture, Hernias also damage to load, damage to property
3 4 Med
Adopt a good manual handling technique:-
a. Think before handling - Plan lift / access load b. Adopt a stable position as close as possible to load – feet apart shoulder
width with leading foot forward c. Bend at knees – slight bend of back may be required d. Test the load before lifting – is it within your capablility ? e. Take good hold of load f. Lift using leg muscles – keep back as straight as possible – do not jerk g. Keep load close to body when moving load
1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 87
39 General Manual Handling Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
h. Avoid twisting and leaning i. Keep head up i. Move smoothly j. Do not lift beyond personal means k. Put load down using the above techniques in reverse
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Manual Handling Regulations 1992 (As amended 2002) • HSE Leaflet – Getting to grips with manual handling INDG143 • HSE Guidance on Manual Handling Regulations L23
Management
• If possible, avoid manual handling tasks, otherwise • Risk assessment of manual handling activity, and provide mechanisation, physical lifting and teamwork as a last resort•
Training
• Operatives to receive Information and instruction about manual handling
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 88
40 Noise Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Hearing damage due to exposure to noise
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity / General Public-potential of temporary or permanent hearing damage
3 4 Med
General guide to noise exposure levels
Are employees exposed to noise which makes it necessary to shout to talk to someone 1 m away, for more than about half an hour per day in total? The noise level here is probably 90 dB or more Undertake a formal Noise Assessment by a competent noise assessor using a
class 2 meter Reduce noise level exposure to operative by means other than PPE (Mechanical
controls) Operative must wear correctly selected hearing protection and must be able to
reduce levels of noise to below 87dB(A) at the ear A hearing protection zone should be instigated to restrict access to area Signage to be placed on all entrances to area Are employees exposed to noise which makes it necessary to shout to talk to someone 2 m away, for more than about two hours per day in total? The noise level here is probably 85 dB or more. (Upper Exposure Action Value) Undertake a formal Noise assessment by a competent noise assessor using a
class 2 meter Reduce noise level exposure to operative by means other than PPE (Mechanical
controls) Operative must wear correctly selected hearing protection A hearing protection zone should be instigated to restrict access Signage to be placed on all entrances to area Is conversation at 2m possible, but noise is intrusive - comparable to a busy street, a typical vacuum cleaner or a crowded restaurant - for more than about six hours per day in total? The noise level here is probably 80 dB or more. (Lower Exposure Action Value) Supply operatives with hearing protection Operative decision to wear PPE Practical methods to reduce noise
1 4 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 89
40 Noise Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
Tools Eliminate the noise, undertake the work process in a different way Use a different tool with a lower noise emission Use hand tools Ensure that tools bits are kept sharp Use tools in accordance with manufacturers guidance Ensure that work equipment is properly maintained Ensure that all guards and fixtures on work equipment are suitable for task
Task Is the task essential, does the task need to be done Ensure that material secured correctly to reduce noise from vibration Reduce the time allowed to undertake the task spread task over number of days
Environment If applicable enclose the task process in an acoustic booth If appropriate use barriers to reduce noise transmission – shut doors Undertake noisy operations away from other operatives
Personnel Reduce exposure time by reducing trigger time on task Use alternative operatives after a stated amount of time Restrict access to other operatives to area eliminating exposure to noise Once exposure levels have been reached no other noisy work tasks can be
carried out by that employee. Noise exposure is accumulative e. Inform all operatives of the risks to hearing and the procedures placed upon
them
Hearing damage due to working environment
Operatives / Other workers in vicinity- potential of temporary or permanent hearing damage
3 4 Med Ensure that all non employees are restricted to the area Shut all doors windows isolating people from noise source
1 4 Low
Annoyed tenant / public due to amount of noise produced
Tenant / Public-potential for annoyance and possible
4 2 Med Inform tenant of the process about to be started and for approx duration Do not undertake noisy tasks before 0900 or after 1600 allowing for tenant and
neighbour comfort 1 2 Low
General Risk Assessments
01/08/2017 Page 90
40 Noise Assessments
Hazard Who might be harmed and how
Risk Rating Without Controls Control Measures
Risk Rating With Controls
L S R L S R
confrontation Provide hearing protection to tenant if required. For comfort use only not because of any exposure values reached
Health hazard Ear infection
Operatives – potential long term hearing damage due to inadequate hearing protection
3 3 Med
Supply health surveillance for operatives in constantly noisy environments Ensure that all operatives are issued with their own PPE ear protection All operatives to be instructed in the use, fitting, cleaning, storage and
replacement of hearing protection Special emphasis to be on disposable ear protection and cleanliness of hands
1 3 Low
Relevant legislation and sources of information
• Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 • HSE Guidance on Noise at Work Regulations L108 • HSE Leaflet – Guidance for employers on Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 INDG362
Management
• Management to assess noise levels and extent of exposure to noise – noise levels to be reduced by selection of appropriate equipment, duration of noise exposure • Hearing defenders to be provided to all operatives – wearing of hearing defenders to be enforced when noise levels above 85 dB(A)
Training
• Operatives to receive Information and instruction about noise and noise exposure