genetic variation among australian isolates of fusarium ...€¦ · m. paynter, e. czislowski, m....
TRANSCRIPT
Genetic variation among Australian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum from strawberry
M. Paynter, E. Czislowski, M. Herrington & E. Aitken
Strawberry production in Australia
Annual planting using bare rooted propagated runners
Growers use same land continuously, pre-plant fumigation
Fragaria x ananassa : coastal regions, Qld & WA (winter), Vic (summer)
Farm gate value: $400 million
Queensland: $200 million (40%)
Granite Belt: $35 million, summer focused
Qld industry: almost all year round
Establishment & growth – $136,524
Important to minimise risk of loss to soil-borne diseases
Fusarium wilt
Fusarium wilt – major disease of strawberry
Phase-out of methyl bromide
Fumigant alternatives and soil treatments less effective
Outbreaks of Fusarium wilt – WA, Qld
Crown isolations – 30-40% Fusarium oxysporum virulence status unknown
Industry expansion in the Granite belt has come with challenges
Increase in replanting into used plastic and ratooning
Predicted (HAL) to constrain economic strawberry production
Emphasis on breeding cultivars with resistance
Spread: via infected planting material, water Severity: greater with warm wet weather Infects: via roots, into vascular tissue, limits water
& nutrient uptake Symptoms: wilting, collapse, death of plant
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae (Fof)
Difficult to eradicate, can remain viable for many years No cure for affected plants. Genetic resistance - economically viable control method
Genetic diversity & virulence of Fof isolates in Australia
Cultivar responses
Breeding & selection of resistant genotypes - test new cultivars against a wide range of pathotypes
Genetic variation in Australia - unknown
Assessment of virulence to identify highly virulent or diverse strains
Challenge potential breeding lines
Project objectives
25 isolates of F. oxysporum tested for genetic relatedness
Forma specialis unknown (if pathogenic to strawberry)
Obtained from major strawberry production regions
Fof diversity
• nine isolates
• Kabarla - susceptible
• Root dip method
• 1 x 106 conidia/mL
• Rating (0=healthy to 10=dead)
• Re-isolated & tested
• Nitrate non-utilising mutants (Nit mutant)
• ID by phenotype
• Potassium chlorate amended media
• Pairing into VCGs
• Same VCG -Heterokaryon
• Translation elongation factor 1α (TEF)
• Mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU)
• Relationships among the F. oxysporum isolates
Gene analysis Pathogenicity Vegetative
Compatibility Group (VCGs)
Pathogenicity differences among isolates, based on disease severity ratings, 8 weeks post-inoculation
Isolate Mean visual rating (0-
healthy, 10 = dead)
N13581 9.6 d
N17337 9.2 d
N18462 7.8 cd
N15309 7.2 c
N15457 3.4 b
N18582 2.0 ab
N18419 1.4 a
N16004 1.4 a
N18421 0.6 a
More virulent
Less virulent
Pathogenicity results
Rate and degree of symptom expression varied among isolates
Significant variation among isolates
Ratings >2 were designated as Fof
6 isolates caused Fusarium wilt
Four virulent isolates chosen for cultivar evaluations
Means with same subscript are not significantly different at P=0.05
Vegetative Compatibility Group (VCGs) results
Sectors generated on MM amended with
potassium chlorate
Heterokaryon formation formed by nit
mutants belonging to the same VCG
Nit mutant generated from all isolates
All combinations of isolates were paired on MM (medium)
Belong to the same VCG by prototrophic heterokaryon formation
Most mutants of an individual isolate were compatible with each other. 6 isolates were incompatible
4 isolates from Sunshine coast region – VCGa
All 4 isolates sampled from WA – VCGb
Remaining isolates, only compatible with one another - single-member VCGs
N18842
N16004
N17203
N16818
N15915
N15457
N15309
N13581
N10226
N9103
Fof_Maff744009
N16239
N16240
N17337
N18462
Fof_KJ776745.1
N9551
N17350
N9055
N9054
N10010
N16893
N18582
N18936
N16999
N18437
SA126
Foz_39298
Fov_KF466424.1
54
63
86
48
51
42
36
86
64
0.01
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
Phylogenetic tree – TEF dataset, 29 nucleotide sequences
Rooted with F. verticillioides (Fov)
ML method based on GTR model
Bootstrap values from 1,000 reps.
Fof_Maff744009 from Japan
Fof_KJ776745.1 from Turkey
Foz_39298 included as outgroup
Lineages i to vii - Fof
VCGa, Qld isolates – lineage i
VCGb, WA isolates – lineage ii
TEF sequences
ix x
mtSSU sequences
mtSSU phylogenetic tree
25 nucleotide sequences
ML method based on GTR model
Bootstrap values from 1,000 reps.
Foz BRIP39298 included as outgroup
N9551
N18936
N18842
N18582
N18462
N17350
N10010
N10226
N13581
N15309
N15457
N15915
N16004
N16239
N16240
N16818
N16893
N16999
N17337
N17203
N9055
N9054
N18437
SA126
Foz_39298 92
66
0.001
TEF & mtSSU datasets
N17337
N18462
N16240
N16239
N15309
N13581
N10226
N15457
N15915
N16004
N16818
N17203
N18842
N16999
N18582
N18936
N10010
N16893
N9054
N9055
N9551
N17350
N18437
Foz_39298
SA126
87
87
41
41
38
94
61
0.001
Phylogenetic tree – TEF & mtSSU datasets
25 nucleotide sequences
ML method based on Tamura 3-parameter model
Bootstrap values from 1,000 reps.
Foz_39298 included as outgroup
VCGb
VCGa
Isolate variation
Diverse range of pathogenicity and genotypes
Variation in disease response- heterogeneous populations
25 isolates categorised into VCGs – 2 distinct VCGs, correlated with differences in geographic origin
Relationships within Fof were clearly defined by TEF analysis
mtSSU analysis was generally insufficient to resolve interspecific genetic variation
Conclusions
Diverse range of pathogenicity and genotypes
Variation in disease response- heterogeneous populations
Pathogenicity tests identified 4 highly virulent isolates
26 isolates categorised into VCGs – 2 distinct VCGs, correlated with differences in geographic origin
Relationships within Fof were clearly defined by TEF analysis
mtSSU analysis was generally insufficient to resolve interspecific genetic variation
Cultivar responses
Pathogenicity trial
• 4 isolates tested on 8 cultivars
• Root dip method (1 x 106 conidia/mL)
• 9 plants (reps), 6 non-inoculated controls
• Disease severity rating: 0=healthy and 10=dead
• Cultivar x isolate interaction analysed
Varietal differences important aspect in resistance breeding and testing of virulent strains
A range of genotypes tested to measure disease intensity
Cultivar by isolate interactions ?
Glasshouse experiment conducted to verify cultivar responses
Cultivar responses
10 rating times (2 to 14 wks post-inoc)
Significant isolate effect (P<0.05)
Significant cultivar effect
Cultivar x isolate interaction
Cultivar x isolate interaction
Symptom expression in cultivars varied among isolates
Differences in disease expression in cultivars (Festival, Sugarbaby - resistant, Kabarla - susceptible)
N18462 most aggressive isolate (Western Australia)
Camarosa very susceptible to WA strain, high % of strawberry production
WA production – poor soils, no cover cropping, strip fumigation
Infected plant material carrying over from season to season
Risk of increased outbreaks
Utilization of Fof
resistance
Cultivar responses
Significant cultivar differences (P ≤ 0.05)
Significant cultivar differences across isolates
Race structure or cultivar specificity
Festival, Sugarbaby, Rubygem – suitable parents
Some cultivars and breeding lines have been included in current DAF strawberry crossing program at MRF
Continue to screen other genotypes
Conclusions
• Development of new cultivars with disease resistance for the strawberry industry
• Strive to breed multi-pathogen resistance
Maroochy Research Facility (DAF) at Nambour School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland
This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited using the Strawberry industry levy and funds from the Australian Government. The Queensland Government has also co-funded the project through the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
.
Don Hutton Apollo Gomez
Lien Ko Louella Woolcock
Dale McKenna Mary Grace
Tali Grace Warwick Grace
Acknowledgements