geophysical mission to mars - nasa · 2012-10-08 · insight science goal 4 october, 2012 3 to...

36
Geophysical Mission to Mars W. Bruce Banerdt 4 October, 2012

Upload: others

Post on 08-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Geophysical Mission to Mars

W. Bruce Banerdt

4 October, 2012

Page 2: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Science Team

4 October, 2012 1MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Dep. PI: Sue Smrekar, JPL

Naoki Kobayashi, JAXA

SEIS PI: Philippe Lognonné, IPGP

Justin Maki, JPL

David Mimoun, SUPAERO

Antoine Mocquet, Univ. Nantes

Paul Morgan, Colo. Geol. Surv.

Mark Panning, Univ. Florida

Tom Pike, Imperial College

HP3 PI: Tilman Spohn, DLR

Jeroen Tromp, Princeton

Tim van Zoest, DLR

Renée Weber, MSFC

Mark Wieczorek, IPGP

PI: Bruce Banerdt, JPL

Sami Asmar, JPL

Don Banfield, Cornell

Lapo Boschi, ETH

Ulrich Christensen, MPS

Véronique Dehant, ROB

RISE PI: Bill Folkner, JPL

Domenico Giardini, ETH

Walter Goetz, MPS

Matt Golombek, JPL

Matthias Grott, DLR

Troy Hudson, JPL

Catherine Johnson, UBC

Günter Kargl, IWF

Page 3: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Partner Organizations

4 October, 2012 2MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

ARC LaRC

Page 4: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Science Goal

4 October, 2012 3

To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation of the interior structure and processes of Mars.

Directly addresses the 2011 Decadal Survey objective to “understand the origin and diversity of terrestrial planets”.

InSight is a terrestrial planets explorer that just happens to be going to Mars…

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 5: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Mars is Key to Understanding Early Formation of Terrestrial Planets, Including Rocky Exoplanets

But Mars is uniquely well-suited to study the common processes that early-on shaped all rocky planets and govern their basic habitability.

– There is evidence that its basic crust and mantle structure have survived little changed from the first few hundred Myr of formation.

– Its surface is much more accessible than Mercury, Venus.

– Our knowledge of its geology, chemistry, climate history provides a rich scientific context for using interior information to increase our understanding of the solar system.

Crust

Crust

Crust

Crust

Mantle

Mantle

MantleMantle

Core

Core

Core

Crust

Mantle

Terrestrial planets all share a common structural framework …

4 October, 2012 MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA 4

Page 6: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

What’s So Special About Mars?

• Because of vigorous mantle convection and plate tectonics, the Earth has lost virtually all structural evidence reflecting its differentiation and early evolution.

• Mars likely retains such evidence in its lateral and radial compositional variations. – SNC isotopic analyses indicate that isolated melt source regions have

persisted since early in Mars’ history, suggesting that mantle convection has been insufficiently vigorous to homogenize the mantle.

– Noble gas measurements indicate that only ~3% of Ar produced from 40K has been degassed from Mars’ mantle, compared to >50% for the Earth.

– Much of the martian crust dates to the first half billion years of solar system history (or earlier).

• Therefore, investigations of the martian interior are likely to find structures that still reflect differentiation and early planetary formation processes.

4 October, 2012 5MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 7: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Level 1 Requirements (Measurements)

Determine the crustal thicknessDetect any large-scale crustal layeringDetermine the seismic velocities in the

upper mantleDistinguish liquid vs. solid outer coreDetermine the core radiusDetermine the core densityDetermine the heat fluxDetermine the rate of seismic activityDetermine epicenter locationsDetermine the rate of meteorite

impacts

Direct Linkage Between Science Objectives and RequirementsInternal Structure Provides a Window into a Planet’s Past

4 October, 2012 6

Mantle

Crust

Core

thicknesslayering

stratificationthermal structure

state

densitysizeMeasures of activity {

Mantle?

? ??

???

?? ?

??

? ?? ?

?

?

?? ? ?

Fe/Mg?

?

• Crust : Its thickness and vertical structure (layering of different compositions) reflects the depth and crystallization processes of the magma ocean and the early post-differentiation evolution of the planet (plate tectonics vs. crustal overturn vs. immobile crust vs. …).

• Mantle : Its behavior (e.g., convection, partial melt generation) determines the manifestation of the thermal history on a planet’s surface; depends directly on its thermal structure and stratification .

• Core : Its size and composition (density ) reflect conditions of accretion and early differentiation; its state (liquid vs. solid) reflects its composition and the thermal history of the planet.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 8: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Focused Set of Measurements

4 October, 2012 7

• InSight capitalizes on advances in technology and analysis to enable results that previously required 4 stations and >$1B.

– Single-Station Seismology• Extremely sensitive, broad-band instrument• Surface installation and effective environmental isolation• Single-station seismic analysis techniques• Multiple signal sources

– Precision Tracking• Sub-decimeter (~2 cm) X-band tracking

– Heat Flow• Innovative, self-penetrating mole penetrates to a depth of 3–5 meters

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 9: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Science Payload

4 October, 2012 8

IDA (JPL) – Instrument Deployment Arm)

IDC (JPL) – Instrument Deployment

Camera)

ICC (JPL) – Instrument Context

Camera)

RISE (S/C Telecom)Rotation and Interior

Structure Experiment

SEIS (CNES)Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure

Pressure, Temperature

and Wind sensors

Electronics

HP3 (DLR)Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe

Tractor Mole (TM)• Hammering mechanism

• Active thermal conductivity

measurements

• Static Tilt sensors

Tether Length Monitor

Support

Structure

Scientific Tether• Embedded T

sensors for

thermal gradient

measurements

Small Deep Space

Transponder

Surface Deployment

Test Bed

(also ETH/ESA, MPS/DLR, IC/Oxford/UKSA, JPL)

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 10: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Martian Seismology – SEIS

4 October, 2012 9

Receiver Function

Background “Hum”

Surface WaveDispersion

Normal Modes

Multiple Analysis Techniques

Arrival Time Analysis

Atmospheric

Excitation

Impacts

Phobos Tide

Multiple Signal Sources

Faulting

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 11: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Precision Radio Tracking – RISE

• First measured constraint on Mars core size came from combining radio Doppler measurements from Viking and Mars Pathfinder– Viking (1977) and Pathfinder (1997) tracking

determined the directions of the spin axis 20 years apart

– Difference of spin axis direction gave precession rate and hence planet’s moment of inertia (constrains mean mantle density, core radius and density)

• InSight will provide another snapshot of the axis another 20 years later

• With 2 years of tracking data, it will be possible to determine nutation amplitudes– Free core nutation constrains core

MOI directly, allowing separation of radius and density.

4 October, 2012 10

precession/nutation

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 12: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Heat Flow Measurement – HP3

• HP3 (Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe) has a self-penetrating “mole” that burrows up to 5 meters below the surface.– It trails a tether containing precise temperature sensors every ~30

cm to measure the temperature profile of the subsurface.– The mole contains a heater to determine thermal conductivity

during descent.

4 October, 2012 11

InSight reference

landing site

Surface Heat Flow Model (mW/m2)

• Together, these yield the rate of heat flowing from the interior.

• Present-day heat flow at a given location provides a critical boundary condition on models of planetary thermal history.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 13: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Mission Overview

4 October, 2012 B.3-12MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

• 20-day launch period opens on 8 March 2016– Constant Arrival Date of 20-Sep-2016

• Type 1 transfer from Earth-to-Mars with 6.5-month Cruise Phase

• Direct entry, deceleration using heat shield and parachute, final descent on thrusters

• Landing in western Elysium Planitia

• Surface deployment of instruments during first 60 sols.

• Full Mars year of surface science operations

Page 14: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Landing Region – Western Elysium Planitia

4 October, 2012 13

Gale Crater

Cerberus

Fossae

Elysium

MonsUtopia

Planitia

Isidis

Gusev Crater

InSight

Landing

Region

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 15: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Spacecraft

• InSight will fly a near-copy of the successful Phoenix Flight System– System (including hardware, procedures, and

personnel) has already operated on Mars– Only minor changes required for InSight

4 October, 2012 14

Cruise

Configuration

Surface Configuration

Entry

Configuration

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 16: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Surface Deployment and Operations

4 October, 2012 15

• Surface installation is critical for achieving InSight’s science.

• After landing the instruments are still ~1 m from the ground

• The 60-sol Surface Deployment Phase completes this process

SeismometerGround

Viking 1

• Seismometer installation achieves direct ground contact and environmental isolation.

• HP3 deployment positions the mole for penetration 3-5 meters beneath the surface of Mars.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 17: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Timeline

• Aug. 20, 2012 Selection• Aug. 29, 2012 Begin Phase B• Aug.13, 2013 PDR• May 6, 2014 CDR• Nov. 4, 2014 Start ATLO• Jan. 9, 2015 Deliver Instruments• Dec. 7, 2015 Ship to Cape• Mar. 8-28, 2016 Launch (3 years, 5 months, 4 days!)• Sept. 20, 2016 Mars Landing• Sept. 12, 2018 End of Nominal Mission

4 October, 2012 MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA 16

Page 18: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Earth, Seen from Mars

4 October, 2012 17

Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. – Albert Einstein

Earth, seen from Mars

Gusev Crater

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 19: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Geophysical Mission to Mars

W. Bruce Banerdt

4 October, 2012

Page 20: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Science Team

4 October, 2012 1MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Dep. PI: Sue Smrekar, JPL

Naoki Kobayashi, JAXA

SEIS PI: Philippe Lognonné, IPGP

Justin Maki, JPL

David Mimoun, SUPAERO

Antoine Mocquet, Univ. Nantes

Paul Morgan, Colo. Geol. Surv.

Mark Panning, Univ. Florida

Tom Pike, Imperial College

HP3 PI: Tilman Spohn, DLR

Jeroen Tromp, Princeton

Tim van Zoest, DLR

Renée Weber, MSFC

Mark Wieczorek, IPGP

PI: Bruce Banerdt, JPL

Sami Asmar, JPL

Don Banfield, Cornell

Lapo Boschi, ETH

Ulrich Christensen, MPS

Véronique Dehant, ROB

RISE PI: Bill Folkner, JPL

Domenico Giardini, ETH

Walter Goetz, MPS

Matt Golombek, JPL

Matthias Grott, DLR

Troy Hudson, JPL

Catherine Johnson, UBC

Günter Kargl, IWF

Page 21: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Partner Organizations

4 October, 2012 2MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

ARC LaRC

Page 22: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Science Goal

4 October, 2012 3

To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation of the interior structure and processes of Mars.

Directly addresses the 2011 Decadal Survey objective to “understand the origin and diversity of terrestrial planets”.

InSight is a terrestrial planets explorer that just happens to be going to Mars…

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 23: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Mars is Key to Understanding Early Formation of Terrestrial Planets, Including Rocky Exoplanets

But Mars is uniquely well-suited to study the common processes that early-on shaped all rocky planets and govern their basic habitability.

– There is evidence that its basic crust and mantle structure have survived little changed from the first few hundred Myr of formation.

– Its surface is much more accessible than Mercury, Venus.

– Our knowledge of its geology, chemistry, climate history provides a rich scientific context for using interior information to increase our understanding of the solar system.

Crust

Crust

Crust

Crust

Mantle

Mantle

MantleMantle

Core

Core

Core

Crust

Mantle

Terrestrial planets all share a common structural framework …

4 October, 2012 MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA 4

Page 24: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

What’s So Special About Mars?

• Because of vigorous mantle convection and plate tectonics, the Earth has lost virtually all structural evidence reflecting its differentiation and early evolution.

• Mars likely retains such evidence in its lateral and radial compositional variations. – SNC isotopic analyses indicate that isolated melt source regions have

persisted since early in Mars’ history, suggesting that mantle convection has been insufficiently vigorous to homogenize the mantle.

– Noble gas measurements indicate that only ~3% of Ar produced from 40K has been degassed from Mars’ mantle, compared to >50% for the Earth.

– Much of the martian crust dates to the first half billion years of solar system history (or earlier).

• Therefore, investigations of the martian interior are likely to find structures that still reflect differentiation and early planetary formation processes.

4 October, 2012 5MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 25: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Level 1 Requirements (Measurements)

Determine the crustal thicknessDetect any large-scale crustal layeringDetermine the seismic velocities in the

upper mantleDistinguish liquid vs. solid outer coreDetermine the core radiusDetermine the core densityDetermine the heat fluxDetermine the rate of seismic activityDetermine epicenter locationsDetermine the rate of meteorite

impacts

Direct Linkage Between Science Objectives and RequirementsInternal Structure Provides a Window into a Planet’s Past

4 October, 2012 6

Mantle

Crust

Core

thicknesslayering

stratificationthermal structure

state

densitysizeMeasures of activity {

Mantle?

? ??

???

?? ?

??

? ?? ?

?

?

?? ? ?

Fe/Mg?

?

• Crust : Its thickness and vertical structure (layering of different compositions) reflects the depth and crystallization processes of the magma ocean and the early post-differentiation evolution of the planet (plate tectonics vs. crustal overturn vs. immobile crust vs. …).

• Mantle : Its behavior (e.g., convection, partial melt generation) determines the manifestation of the thermal history on a planet’s surface; depends directly on its thermal structure and stratification .

• Core : Its size and composition (density ) reflect conditions of accretion and early differentiation; its state (liquid vs. solid) reflects its composition and the thermal history of the planet.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 26: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Focused Set of Measurements

4 October, 2012 7

• InSight capitalizes on advances in technology and analysis to enable results that previously required 4 stations and >$1B.

– Single-Station Seismology• Extremely sensitive, broad-band instrument• Surface installation and effective environmental isolation• Single-station seismic analysis techniques• Multiple signal sources

– Precision Tracking• Sub-decimeter (~2 cm) X-band tracking

– Heat Flow• Innovative, self-penetrating mole penetrates to a depth of 3–5 meters

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 27: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Science Payload

4 October, 2012 8

IDA (JPL) – Instrument Deployment Arm)

IDC (JPL) – Instrument Deployment

Camera)

ICC (JPL) – Instrument Context

Camera)

RISE (S/C Telecom)Rotation and Interior

Structure Experiment

SEIS (CNES)Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure

Pressure, Temperature

and Wind sensors

Electronics

HP3 (DLR)Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe

Tractor Mole (TM)• Hammering mechanism

• Active thermal conductivity

measurements

• Static Tilt sensors

Tether Length Monitor

Support

Structure

Scientific Tether• Embedded T

sensors for

thermal gradient

measurements

Small Deep Space

Transponder

Surface Deployment

Test Bed

(also ETH/ESA, MPS/DLR, IC/Oxford/UKSA, JPL)

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 28: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Martian Seismology – SEIS

4 October, 2012 9

Receiver Function

Background “Hum”

Surface WaveDispersion

Normal Modes

Multiple Analysis Techniques

Arrival Time Analysis

Atmospheric

Excitation

Impacts

Phobos Tide

Multiple Signal Sources

Faulting

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 29: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Precision Radio Tracking – RISE

• First measured constraint on Mars core size came from combining radio Doppler measurements from Viking and Mars Pathfinder– Viking (1977) and Pathfinder (1997) tracking

determined the directions of the spin axis 20 years apart

– Difference of spin axis direction gave precession rate and hence planet’s moment of inertia (constrains mean mantle density, core radius and density)

• InSight will provide another snapshot of the axis another 20 years later

• With 2 years of tracking data, it will be possible to determine nutation amplitudes– Free core nutation constrains core

MOI directly, allowing separation of radius and density.

4 October, 2012 10

precession/nutation

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 30: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Heat Flow Measurement – HP3

• HP3 (Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe) has a self-penetrating “mole” that burrows up to 5 meters below the surface.– It trails a tether containing precise temperature sensors every ~30

cm to measure the temperature profile of the subsurface.– The mole contains a heater to determine thermal conductivity

during descent.

4 October, 2012 11

InSight reference

landing site

Surface Heat Flow Model (mW/m2)

• Together, these yield the rate of heat flowing from the interior.

• Present-day heat flow at a given location provides a critical boundary condition on models of planetary thermal history.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 31: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Mission Overview

4 October, 2012 B.3-12MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

• 20-day launch period opens on 8 March 2016– Constant Arrival Date of 20-Sep-2016

• Type 1 transfer from Earth-to-Mars with 6.5-month Cruise Phase

• Direct entry, deceleration using heat shield and parachute, final descent on thrusters

• Landing in western Elysium Planitia

• Surface deployment of instruments during first 60 sols.

• Full Mars year of surface science operations

Page 32: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Landing Region – Western Elysium Planitia

4 October, 2012 13

Gale Crater

Cerberus

Fossae

Elysium

MonsUtopia

Planitia

Isidis

Gusev Crater

InSight

Landing

Region

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 33: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Spacecraft

• InSight will fly a near-copy of the successful Phoenix Flight System– System (including hardware, procedures, and

personnel) has already operated on Mars– Only minor changes required for InSight

4 October, 2012 14

Cruise

Configuration

Surface Configuration

Entry

Configuration

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 34: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Surface Deployment and Operations

4 October, 2012 15

• Surface installation is critical for achieving InSight’s science.

• After landing the instruments are still ~1 m from the ground

• The 60-sol Surface Deployment Phase completes this process

SeismometerGround

Viking 1

• Seismometer installation achieves direct ground contact and environmental isolation.

• HP3 deployment positions the mole for penetration 3-5 meters beneath the surface of Mars.

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA

Page 35: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

InSight Timeline

• Aug. 20, 2012 Selection• Aug. 29, 2012 Begin Phase B• Aug.13, 2013 PDR• May 6, 2014 CDR• Nov. 4, 2014 Start ATLO• Jan. 9, 2015 Deliver Instruments• Dec. 7, 2015 Ship to Cape• Mar. 8-28, 2016 Launch (3 years, 5 months, 4 days!)• Sept. 20, 2016 Mars Landing• Sept. 12, 2018 End of Nominal Mission

4 October, 2012 MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA 16

Page 36: Geophysical Mission to Mars - NASA · 2012-10-08 · InSight Science Goal 4 October, 2012 3 To understand the formation and evolution of terrestrial planets through investigation

Earth, Seen from Mars

4 October, 2012 17

Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. – Albert Einstein

Earth, seen from Mars

Gusev Crater

MEPAG Meeting — Monrovia, CA