geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): critical geopolitics counter-framing and...
TRANSCRIPT
Geopolitical perspectiveson war and peace (3):
Critical GeopoliticsCounter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq
GEOG 220 – Geopolitics
Framing
=> Selective representation
• Policy framing: selected words, images, descriptions => limited policy options
• Mass media framing: biased depictions => limited public debate
Geopolitical framingObjective: using the trauma of 9/11 to justify Iraq invasion and consolidate ‘US security and credibility’
Iraq as terror threat
Iraq as theatre of war
Iraq as liberated population
Gaining ‘consent’ for war
Jan-03 31% immediate invasion
Feb-03 40% Convinced by Bush’s speech
Mar-03 47% Invasion without UNSC approval
Apr-03 62% In support of the war
Jan-03 Feb-03 Mar-03 Apr-030%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Pew Research Center, poll 1500 adults in UShttp://pewresearch.org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anniversary
• Iraq as terror threat
=> US Government deception
“Top US officials…made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq…[as] part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretences.”
Center for Public Integrity, 2008 report.
Iraq as liberated population=> US government exactions
Documented civilian deaths from violence 110,205 – 120,395
• Main points:– Geopolitical framing of ‘Iraq’ allowed for initial
consent by US public– Framing proved biased and shortsighted– Resulted in counter-framing of ‘US’ as deceiving,
declining and dangerous => greater distrust
– Need to resist such ‘framings’…
• Re-interpreting the geopolitical frame: Saddam’s rifle
• Subaltern geopolitics – Libya in Western perspectives
Today the European states have attacked the Islamic countries from every corner. Italy has attacked Tripoli in North Africa, Russian troops have occupied northern Iran, and English troops have entered southern Iran. This will inevitably result in the disappearance of Islam. Therefore all Muslims, Arab and non Arab, must prepare themselves to repel unbelief (kufr) from ‑the two Islamic countries. They must not hold themselves back or spare any expense to bring about the means to expel Italian troops from Tripoli, and Russian and English troops from northern and southern Iran. This is one of the most important Islamic duties, in order that the Ottoman and Iranian empires remain protected and safe from Christian attacks, with Allah's help. 5 Dhu ‘l Hijjah‑Muhammad Kazim al Tabataba'i.‑
The Iraqis are going towards Baghdad to demand their rights, and it is necessary for you and for all the Muslims to join their brothers on this noble principle. Beware of disturbing the peace and disagreeing and quarrelling amongst yourselves. I advise you to protect the lives, possessions and honour of all religious communities and sects in your country, and never to harm any one of them.
Mirza Shhazi, religious leader, April 1920
• Enfield rifle seized from British colonial troops in 1920 pro-independence uprising by Iraqis
• Symbol of Iraqi nationalism as British came to rule former Ottoman provinces following WWI
• Up to 9,000 Iraqi killed by British troops to quell the May 1920 Revolution, incl. through air bombardments
• British install Faysal ibn Husayn as King of Iraq in 1921 to give the appearance of independence (indirect rule)
• Iraq remains de facto colony until 1958 coup, with nationalization of oil assets between 1961-1972
Othering
• The ‘Othered’ Iraq and the ‘other Iraq’– ‘Othered Iraq’: the Iraq within conventional
geopolitical perspective, where even understandings of ‘everyday life’ brings a sense of distance and ‘Otherness’
– The ‘other Iraq’: the Iraq outside conventional geopolitical perspective, where understandings of ‘everyday life’ brings a sense of common humanity (commonality)
The ‘Other’ or ‘constitutive Other’
• Through selective (and biased) perceptions of differences between yourself and someone else, or between your country and another, you come to define yourself or your country
• More than a comparative perspective … it is a constitutive one (i.e. constitutes two supposed ‘realities’)
Þ Other or ‘constitute Other’Þ See, Edward Said (1979) Orientalism
Geopolitics, Othering and Imperialism
• Othering: “act of emphasizing the perceived weaknesses of marginalized groups as a way of stressing the alleged strength of those in positions of power”
• The way in which you define ‘Others’ defines your ‘Self’ => self-legitimization of conduct
Conclusion
• Geopolitical frames are culturally and historically relative
• Critical geopolitics gives attention to diversity of interpretations of ‘history’
• Anti- or counter-geopolitics requires to be attentive to processes of ‘Othering’ and to bring out counter-narratives
At home …
• See this brief video:• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cAeTkA_1fk
• What was the US government trying to (literally) get ‘out of the frame’ of the cameras at the UN?
• What counter-narrative did the tapestry evoke?• What is the role of art in geopolitics?• Was this communication maneuver by the US
government successful?