george a. souliotis laboratory of physical chemistry, department of chemistry, national and...
TRANSCRIPT
George A. Souliotis
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Athens, Greece
and
Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University,College Station, Texas, USA
International Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics and Thermodynamics,in honor of Prof. Joe Natowitz
TAMU, College Station, 19-22 Aug. 2013
Studies of N/Z equilibration via Heavy-Residue Isoscaling
BigSol Setup at TAMU: Sept. 2002 BigSol Setup at TAMU: Sept. 2002
The The Superconducting Superconducting Solenoid Rare Isotope Line at TAMUSolenoid Rare Isotope Line at TAMU
BigSol Line results: Rare Isotope Production ( Sept.-Oct. 2003)
Example of Z-A distribution of fragments from64Ni(25MeV/u)+64NiB=1.473,IBigSol=79.3 AAngular acceptance: 1.5-3.0 deg.
A
Z
Z
ANeutron-Rich fragments from64Ni (25MeV/u) + 64Ni (4.0mg/cm2)B=1.900 Tm, IBigSol=102.5 Aibeam = 1 pnA, 4 hour runAngular acceptance: 1.5-3.0 deg.
-1p+1n
-2p+2n
-4p
CoFe
MnCr
Experimental work at Texas A&M: deep inelastic collisions below the Fermi energy: 86Kr(25MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni,124Sn PRL 91, 022701 (2003) 86Kr(15MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni,124Sn PRC 84, 064607 (2011) PRC 84, 064607 (2011)
Findings: Peripheral collisions: enhanced production of n-rich nuclei Heavy Residues as probes of nuclear dynamics and EOS:: Heavy-residue isoscaling: Heavy-residue isoscaling: PRC 68, 024605 (2003) PRC 73, 024606 (2006)PRC 73, 024606 (2006) N/Z equilibration: PLB 588, 35 (2004) Present work: Heavy residue Isoscaling in 15 MeV/nucleon reactions
Evolution of the N/Z w.r.t. to TKEL (~ degree of dissipation) Comparisons with the DIT and CoMD models.
Overview of Heavy-Residue work :
Collisions between Heavy Ions at Fermi Energies (10<E/A < 40MeV)
b: impact parameterθ: scattering angle
Approaching phase:
Target (Zt,At)
θ
b
Projectile (Zp,Ap) • Neutrons• Protons
Overlap (interaction) phase:
exchange of nucleons:
Deep Inelastic Transfer(DIT) Model
L. Tassan-Got and C. Stephan,
Nucl. Phys. A 524, 121 (1991)
excited projectile-likefragment (PLF) or quasi-projectile
excited target-likefragment (TLF) orquasi-target
Grazing angle, θgr: nuclei in touching configuration
The Process of N/Z Transport * and Equilibration
112 Sn50 62
124 Sn50 74
86Kr36 50
86Kr36 50
N/Z = 1.40
N/Z = 1.48
N/Z = 1.40
N/Z = 1.24
Projectile
Target
Excited Projectile-likeFragment (PLF) or Quasi-projectile
(N/Z)eq = 1.44
(N/Z)eq = 1.30
*or isospin diffusion
Nucleon exchange:Deep Inelastic Transfer (DIT) Model
L. Tassan-Got and C. Stephan,
Nucl. Phys. A 524, 121 (1991)
*M. Papa, A. Bonasera et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 024612 (2001)
Microscopic Calculations: Constrained Molecular Dynamics (CoMD)*
CoMD : Quantum Molecular Dynamics model (Semiclassical)
Nucleons are considered as Gaussian wavepackets
N-N effective interaction ( Skyrme-type with K = 200 )
Several forms for N-N symmetry potential Vsym(ρ)
Pauli principle imposed (via a phase-space ‘constraint’ algorithm )
Fragment recognition algorithm (Rmin = 3.0 fm)
• Neutrons• Protons
CoMD Evolution of 86Kr Nucleus: t = 0-500 fm/c Δt = 10 fm/c
z 86Kr36 50
CoMD Calculations: 86Kr (15 MeV/nucleon) + 124Sn
CoMD: Constraint Molecular Dynamics; M. Papa, A. Bonasera, Phys. Rev. C 64, 024612 (2001)
• Neutrons• Protons
86Kr36 50
124Sn50 74
Peripheral Collision
b = 10 fm t = 0-300 fm/c Δt = 10 fm/c
zz
b = 8 fm t = 0-300 fm/c Δt = 10 fm/c
86Kr36 50
124Sn50 74
z
Semi-Peripheral Collision
z
Si Telescope Er ΔE
PPAC1 Start T,X,Y
Production Target
D1D2WienFilter
Q1Q2
Q3
Q4Q5
Dispersive Image
FinalAchromatic Image Rotatable Arm
Reaction Angle: 0-12o (selectable)
PPAC2 Stop T, X,Y
MARS Acceptances:Angular: 9 msrMomentum: 4 %
Βρ = mυ/Q
Separation Stage I
Separation Stage II
D3
MARS Recoil Separator and Setup for Heavy-Residue / RIB Studies*
K500Beam
*G. A. Souliotis et al., Nucl. Instr. Methods B, 266, 4692 (2008) and references therein
Extracted physical quantities: Velocity, Energy loss, Total Energy Mass-to-charge ratio: A/Q B ~ A/Q Atomic Number Z Z ~ ΔE1/2 Ionic charge Q Q ~ f(E, , B)
Mass number A A = Qint A/Q
Reconstructed: Fragment Yield Distribution Y(Z, A, υ)
Experimental Details
Reactions studied with MARS:
Δθ = 2.2-5.8o 86Kr22+ (15 MeV/u, 5 pnA) + 64Ni, 58Ni (gr~ 6o) Δθ = 5.6-9.2o 86Kr + 124Sn, 112Sn (gr~ 9o)
Experimental Mass Distributions: 86Kr (15 MeV/u) + 64,58Ni*
Large cross sectionsof n- pickup products
-6p
- 3p
-2p-1p
-5p
34Se
33As
30Zn31Ga
32Ge
35Br
-4p
23
86Kr + 64Ni (15 MeV/u)
86Kr + 58Ni (15 MeV/u)
*G. A. Souliotis et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 064607 (2011)
Comparison of calculations with data: 86Kr (15 MeV/nucleon) + 64NiComparison of calculations with data: 86Kr (15 MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni
* P.N. Fountas, G.A. Souliotis et al., in preparation
86Kr + 64Ni (15 MeV/u)* DIT/SMM
------ DITm/SMM
DIT : L. Tassan-Got, C. Stephan, Nucl. Phys. A 524, 121 (1991)
DITm: M. Veselsky, G.A. Souliotis, Nucl. Phys. A 765, 252 (2006)
SMM: Statistical Multifragmentation Model: A. Botvina et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 044610 (2002); Nucl. Phys. A 507, 649 (1990)
35Br 34Se
33As 32Ge
31Ga 30Zn
*data: G.A. Souliotis et al., PRC 84, 064607 (2011)
Comparison: Data, Calculations: 86Kr (15 MeV/nucleon) + 64NiComparison: Data, Calculations: 86Kr (15 MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni
*data: G.A. Souliotis et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 064607 (2011)
CoMD: Constrained Molecular Dynamics: M.Papa et. al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 024612 (2001)
GEMINI: Binary Decay Code: R. Charity, Nucl. Phys. A 483, 391 (1988)
SMM: Statistical Multifragmentation Model: A. Botvina et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 044610 (2002); Nucl. Phys. A 507, 649 (1990)
86Kr + 64Ni (15 MeV/u)* CoMD/SMM
----- CoMD/GEMINI35Br 34Se
33As 32Ge
31Ga 30Zn
* P.N. Fountas, G.A. Souliotis et al., in preparation
Scaling of Yield Ratios: 15MeV/nucleon data*
R21 (N,Z) = Y2/Y1
R21 = C exp ( α N )
•86Kr+64Ni,58Ni data at 4o (gr=6.0o)
•86Kr+124Sn,112Sn data at 7o (gr=9.0ο)
*G. A. Souliotis et al., in preparation
Isoscaling Parameter α : 15MeV/u data**
○ 86Kr+64Ni,58Ni ( 4o data)
R21 = C exp ( α N )
● 86Kr+124Sn,112Sn (7o data)
α = 4 Csym/T ( (Z/A)12
– (Z/A)22
)
Quasi-projectiles 1: n-poor 2:nrich M. B. Tsang et al. Phys. Rev. C 64, 054615 (2001) A.S. Botvina et al. Phys. Rev. C 65, 044610 (2002) P. Marini et al, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034617 (2012)
*
*
**G. A. Souliotis et al., (in preparation)
Velocity, TKEL, E* vs Z 15MeV/u data**
○ 86Kr+64Ni,58Ni ( 4o data)
● 86Kr+124Sn,112Sn (7o data)
Peripheral collision:tinteraction short
Semi-peripheral collisions:tinteraction longer
**G. A. Souliotis et al., (in preparation)
Residues: 86Kr (15 MeV/u) + 64,58Ni
-------- DIT
-------- CoMD (asy-stiff)
-------- CoMD (asy-soft)86Kr+ 64Ni
86Kr+58Ni
• MARS Isoscaling data*
Δ(Z/A)2 = (Z/A)21
- (Z/A)2 2
= α T / (4 Csym )
DIT: Deep Inelastic Transfer: L. Tassan-Got, Nucl. Phys. A 524, 121 (1991)CoMD: Constraint Molecular Dynamics
* G.A. Souliotis et al. (in preparation)
Fermi gas: T2 = K0 (/o) 2/3 *
K0 : inv. lev. dens. param. at o (K0 = 12 )Assume QP at normal density =o
Csym =23 MeV
Residues: 86Kr (15 MeV/u) + 124,112Sn
-------- DIT
-------- CoMD (asy-stiff)
-------- CoMD (asy-soft)86Kr+ 124Sn
86Kr+112Sn
• MARS Isoscaling data*
Δ(Z/A)2 = (Z/A)21
- (Z/A)2 2
= α T / (4 Csym )
α,V,TKEL, E* vs Z 25MeV/u data**
● 86Kr+124Sn,112Sn (4o data)
Peripheral collision:tinteraction short
Semi-peripheral collisions:tinteraction long
**G. A. Souliotis et al., PLB 588, 35 (2004)
Residues: 86Kr (25 MeV/u) + 124,112Sn
-------- DIT
-------- CoMD (asy-stiff)
-------- CoMD (asy-soft)86Kr+ 124Sn
86Kr+112Sn
• MARS Isoscaling data: G.A.Souliotis et al. PRC 68, 024605 (2003)
Δ(Z/A)2 = (Z/A)21
- (Z/A)2 2
= α T / (4 Csym )
Interaction time vs TKEL : CoMD calculation
● 86Kr+124Sn,112Sn (25 MeV/u)
● 86Kr+124Sn,112Sn (15 MeV/u)
● 86Kr+64Ni,58Ni (15MeV/u)
● 40Ar+64Ni,58Ni (15MeV/u)
TKEL/TKELmax = 1- exp(-t/τ)
τ ~ 150 fm/c
FAUST/Q-Triplet Setup at TAMU*FAUST/Q-Triplet Setup at TAMU*
* Paul Cammarata et al, ( SJYgroup )
● Study of heavy-residue isoscaling from peripheral collisions. Information on N/Z transport and equilibration via the correlation: Δ vs TKEL ● Microscopic calculations of peripheral collisions with CoMD. No sensitivity to Vsym(ρ) found in the Δ vs TKEL correlation
* TAMU Cyclotron Upgrade, see : http://cyclotron.tamu.edu
Summary and Conclusions
Extension of experimental studies using neutron-rich RIBs from TAMU RIB Upgrade*, SPES at Legnaro, SPIRAL-II at GANIL and other facilities
Plans for future work:
● Detailed comparisons with the theoretical codes ( DIT, CoMD,…. ) ● Experimental measurements of 15 MeV/nucleon reactions with the TAMU FAUST/Q-Triplet system (reconstruct QP).
Collaborators
M. Veselsky, S. Galanopoulos, Z. Kohley, A. McIntosh, L.W. May, B.C. Stein, S.J. Yennello
Special thanks to:
A. Bonasera, TAMU and INFN, Catania, Italy,A. Botvina, FIAS, Frankfurt, Germany
This work was supported in part by:The Robert A. Welch Foundation: Grant Number A-1266 and,
The Department of Energy: Grant Number DE-FG03-93ER40773
Acknowledgements:
END of Talk :
Additional material here:
Peripheral Collisions: 86Kr + 124Sn
Calculations with a Thomas-Fermi code: V. Kolomietz, Phys. Rev. C 64, 024315 (2001)
Peripheral Collisions:
can provide information on the evolution of the N/Z degree of freedom and ( via microscopic calculations) the effective nucleon-nucleon interaction
R =12 fm
np
ρoverlap = ρprojectile + ρtarget
ρoverlap ~ 1/4 ρo124Sn
50 74
86Kr36 50
Peripheral collision:tinteraction
short
np
R =10 fmρoverlap ~ 1.0-1.5 ρo
124Sn50 74
86Kr36 50
Semi-peripheral collision:tinteraction
longer
Isoscaling: 40Ar (15MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni, 58Ni
•40Ar + 64Ni,58Ni (data inside gr=6.2ο)
R21 = C exp ( α N )
α = 4 Csym/T ( (Z/A)12
– (Z/A)22
)
Quasi-projectiles 1: n-poor 2:nrich
GS files in “ar07” : anal_mars_ar_jun07 z1_iso_arni_tex.fit z1_iso_arni_figure.tex => *.ps
a_iso_arni_tex.fit a_iso_arni_figure.tex => *.ps
Velocity, E*, TKEL vs Z correlations: 15MeV/u data
υmin => E*/A ~2.0 MeV
● 40Ar+64Ni,58Ni (4o data)
GS files in “ar07” : anal_mars_ar_jun07 vz_iso_arni_tex.fit vz_iso_arni_figure.tex => *.ps
Residues: 40Ar (15 MeV/u) + 64,58Ni
-------- DIT
-------- CoMD (linear)-------- CoMD (a-soft)-------- CoMD (a-stiff)-------- CoMD (Vsym = 0)
40Ar+ 64Ni
40Ar+58Ni
Csym(ρ)
• MARS Isoscaling data*
Δ(Z/A)2 = (Z/A)21
- (Z/A)2 2
= a T / (4 Csym )
GS files in “ar07” : anal_mars_ar_jun07 azel1_arni_tex.fit azel1_arni_figure.tex => *.ps
TKEL correlations (I): All available MARS data
О 86Kr(15MeV/u)+64,58Ni (4o data)
GS files in “kr07” : anal_mars_kr_jun07 azel_xxxx_tex.fit azel_xxxx_figure.tex => *.ps
● 86Kr(15MeV/u)+124,112Sn (7o data)
▲ 40Ar(15MeV/u)+64,58Ni (4o data)
TKEL correlations (II): All available MARS data
О 86Kr(15MeV/u)+64,58Ni (4o data)
GS files in “kr07” : anal_mars_kr_jun07 azelv_xxxx_tex.fit azelv_xxxx_figure.tex => *.ps
● 86Kr(15MeV/u)+124,112Sn (7o data)
▲ 40Ar(15MeV/u)+64,58Ni (4o data)
υrel / υrel,max
40Ar +64Ni
largest cross sectionswith the n-rich 64Ni target
Nuclide cross sections from: 40Ar (15MeV/nucleon) + 64Ni, 58Ni, 27Al
40Ar +58Ni
40Ar +27Al
38S σ = 20 mb
K Ar
Cl S
P Si
(+1p)
(-1p)
(-4p)(-3p)
(-2p)
Mass Distributions: 86Kr (15 MeV/u) + 64Ni*
Large cross sectionsof n- pickup products
-4p
- 3p
-2p-1p
-5p
34Se
33As
30Zn31Ga
32Ge
35Br
-4p
23
86Kr + 64Ni (15 MeV/u)
86Kr + 64Ni (25 MeV/u)*
----- DIT/GEMINI
----- EPAX
*G. A. Souliotis et al., Phys. Lett. B 543, 163 (2002)
The Superconducting Solenoid Rare Isotope Line at TAMU:
Schematic diagram of the setup for heavy-residue studies from DIC:
Results of BigSol Line tests: Charge State Distributions
Charge state distribution at PPAC1 (thru 2-inch hole) of 64Ni (35MeV/u)
after a mylar stripper.
B=2.020 Tm, IBigSol=109.0 A
Angular acceptance: 2.0-6.0 deg.
28+ 27+
Y
X
Angular acceptance: 3.0-6.0 deg.
BigSol Line: 136Xe DIC data
Example of Z-E/A distribution of fragments from 136Xe (20 MeV/u) data: ( ΔΕ-Ε-TOF techniques, use of large area Si and PPACs) :
E/A (MeV/u)
ZZ
E/A (MeV/u)
136Xe “elastic”
B=1.325 Tm, Angular acceptance: 1.5-3.0 deg.
136Xe+124Sn 136Xe+232Th
136Xe “elastic”
up to + 6 p
END of Talk
( ΙI )
Quad Triplet :
Ion Optics calculations with COSY-Infinity (M. Berz et al.)
θ0= 30 mr φ0 =30 mr
Quadrupole Triplet: 1st order optics
Target
PPAC1t,X,Y
Rays through QTS: 46Ar18+(14.7 MeV/u) Bρ=1.400 Tm
x-z plane
y-z plane
Beam
Q1 Q2 Q3PPAC2, ΔE,E
Ion Optics calculations with COSY-Infinity (M. Berz et al.)
θ0= 30 mr φ0 =30mr
Quadrupole Triplet: 3d order optics
Target
PPAC1t,X,Y
x-z plane
y-z plane
Beam
Q1 Q2 Q3
Rays through QTS: 46Ar18+(14.7 MeV/u) Bρ=1.400 Tm
PPAC2, ΔE,E
Ion Optics calculations with COSY-Infinity (M. Berz et al.)
θ0= 30 mr φ0 =30mr
Quadrupole Triplet: 3d order optics
Target x-z plane
y-z plane
Q1 Q2 Q3
Rays through QTS: 46Ar18+(14.7 MeV/u) Bρ=1.400 Tm
0.0% Δp/p
2.5% Δp/p
5.0% Δp/p
Beam
PPAC1t,X,Y
PPAC2, ΔE,E