geosciences at nice 2003
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Geosciences at Nice 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080104/5750243b1a28ab877eadd980/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The first joint Assembly of European and
American Geosciences Unions (EGS–
AGU–EUG), held in Nice on 6–11 April
2003, was a spectacular week of new science,
with packed sessions for planetary science,
astrobiology, solar–terrestrial science and all
aspects of geophysics. It combined meetings of
the European Geophysical Society, the American
Geophysical Union and The European Union of
Geosciences, with the result that the convention
centre, at the Acropolis, came close to failure
because of the numbers attending. Over 12 000
people registered, leading to long queues for reg-
istration and admittance. Heightened security
meant a 30 minute wait simply to enter the
building on the first two days. Once inside, a
vast choice awaited participants. With 20 par-
allel sessions, about 8000 posters and almost
8000 oral presentations, most delegates were
spoiled for choice. An excellent programme
book, plus a CD of abstracts, was a big help in
planning attendance at the sessions.
Session organizers largely succeeded in keep-
ing to schedule, so it was normally possible to
navigate between two or three sessions at any
one time. And for those who could not find a
talk or a poster of interest, display booths beck-
oned in the exhibit area. One book publisher
reported the highest level of sales ever made at
a geosciences meeting. In the late afternoon
abundant free wine flowed in the poster area,
where the population density of drinkers made
it difficult to study the posters.
Mars reports
The programme organizers embedded a week of
talks and posters about Mars into the planetary
science coverage, with presentations from Mars
Odyssey a meeting highlight. At the date of the
conference it had completed one year of its
2.5 year mission, and results were announced
from the Thermal Imaging System, Gamma
Ray Spectrometer, and Martian Radiation
Environment Experiment.
Martian water ice is abundant in the upper
metre of the subsurface at latitudes polewards
of 60°. At the south pole the ice is exposed at
the surface. The Odyssey team rolled out a
hypothesis for gully formation, which they
attribute to the melting of remnant snow
packs. At low latitudes, hydrated soil is
commonplace. Among the details that stood out
are kilometre-wide stretches of bare bedrock
that were unexpected, given Mars’ known
dustiness. Such large areas of exposed rock
indicate that strong environmental forces are
currently at work, scouring sediment from the
surface. Also unexpected were the accumula-
tions of loose rock, without a coating of dust,
that are common on martian hillsides, indicat-
ing continuing weathering.
From an analysis of the spectra from 10 dif-
ferent bands of infrared light, the thermal imag-
ing team has begun to identify specific mineral
deposits, including a layer of the mineral olivine
near the bottom of a four-and-a-half-kilometre
deep canyon known as Ganges Chasma. Olivine
is significant because it decomposes easily in the
presence of water. Odyssey has also found sig-
nificant spatial variations in K, Th, Fe and Si.
The Odyssey presentations concluded with an
overview of the science in the pipeline. We can
expect high-resolution mineral mapping and
thermal mapping, and a full year of the CO2/
hydrogen cycles. The Mars Odyssey session was
complemented by a half-day of talks on future
missions and their instrumentation.
For the first time at an EGU meeting, astro-
biology had a thorough airing, with sessions
devoted to the theme “Water and life”. Not sur-
prisingly, most of these papers had a martian
theme, with the talks from biologists giving the
planetary scientists something new to think
about. A second astrobiology focus came via
two-dozen talks and posters on exoplanets and
planetary formation models.
The US National Climatic Data Center also
made a debut appearance, by deciding to use
the AGU meeting to roll out its annual State of
the Climate survey, an essential reference work
for newspaper meteorologists. 2002 did not dis-
appoint those who follow extremes in the
weather: in terms of global temperature it was
the second warmest year on record, beating
2001 into third place. Most of the temperature
records were highs rather than lows. North
America endured a serious drought at levels last
seen in the 1930s, and Russia was notably hot-
ter than average. Australia, meanwhile, had the
fourth driest year on record. Antarctica had a
temperature anomaly of +10.3 °C in the strato-
sphere, due to a splitting of the ozone hole, and
this gave the continent its warmest spring on
record. Global precipitation is going up, with an
increase of 10% in northern latitudes, and the
biggest weather story of 2002 was the extensive
flooding in Central Europe, with Germany tak-
ing a $9 bn hit in flood damage.
Followers of natural catastrophes and disas-
ters had food for thought in 70 presentations of
new results from a worldwide collaboration on
marine gas hydrates. Hydrates are solid com-
pounds of ice-like substances which host low-
molecular-weight gases (CH4, CO2, H2S) in
cages formed by water molecules. They are sta-
ble only under the high pressures and low tem-
peratures associated with the deep sea, and are
found worldwide below 700 m depth.
Geochemists announced the discovery of free
methane gas in coexistence with seafloor gas
hydrates. This is a surprise: the free methane
may be coming from a huge subsurface bio-
sphere. There were lively clashes over the
“hydrate gun” hypothesis, which explains the
origin of extreme warm events via massive
eruptions of gas hydrates on very short time
scales, releasing greenhouse gases.
This exciting meeting was notable for the high
proportion of younger delegates, from first-year
research students through to postdocs, who
were using youth hostels and budget airlines to
keep their costs down. The poster sessions
(changing daily) are a splendid opportunity for
younger colleagues to meet new collaborators
and extend their networks. The sheer breadth
of the topics on display could be overwhelming
at times, and a certain discipline was needed to
cover the papers of personal interest. Overall
this was one of the most stimulating meetings
I’ve attended, and I’ll certainly return next year,
when it will not clash with the National
Astronomy Meeting. �
Simon Mitton ([email protected]) is SeniorFellow, St Edmund’s College, Cambridge CB3 0BN,where he writes on a wide variety of topics inphysics, astrophysics and geophysics.
Meeting report
5.25October 2003 Vol 44
Geosciences at Nice 2003Simon Mitton reports from the joint meeting in April of the European Geophysical Society, the American
Geophysical Union and The European Union of Geosciences, the largest geosciences meeting in Europe.
Ganges Chasma in false colour IR showing olivineas the purple band on each side of the valley.(NASA/JPL/Arizona State University)