geotechnical parameters for retaining wall design … · 2018-04-17 · as 4678-2002 earth...
TRANSCRIPT
Geotechnical Parameters
for Retaining Wall Design
11th October 2012
Tanya Kouzmin
1
Most geotechnical failures are of retaining walls
Are failure caused by WRONG calculations?
Not usually – calculation methods are given in every textbook.
The main contributions are WRONG geotechnical parameters and WATER
2
AS 4678-2002
Earth Retaining Structures
Has been with us for 10 years!!
3
Limit State Design
Retaining Walls
4
5
Gravity Wall Failure Mechanisms
Must ALL be checked for drained and
undrained conditions
Do we use drained or undrained analysis?
o Undrained (clays only): Cu and Ka = Kp = 1
o Drained (all soils) : Ka, Ko Kp based on effective soil
friction angle (and effective cohesion)
Which is more conservative?
Why would we use it?
Getting Started
6
All retaining walls must work for both drained and
undrained conditions of the surrounding soil!!!!!
�Undrained (short term) generally not problematic
because clay can stand on it’s own
�Unsupported height = 2Cu/γ
�Drained generally more critical for clays
Q: But we always design for sand, or φ = 300 !
A: How much sand is there in Melbourne?
Getting Started
7
• SOIL FRICTION ANGLE
• GEOMETRY
�Back slope and Front slope
�Surcharge
�Failure Surface
�Wall Angle
• WALL FRICTION
• FORMULA USED
What affects the earth pressure parameters ?
8
It all starts with Friction Angle - When is φ NOT 300 ?
Friction angle of cohesive materials
9
Soil Friction Angle
SANDS
o Loose 290 - 330
o Medium 340 - 380
o Dense 390 - 430
(For Silty Sand reduce the above by 30)
CLAYS
SC (Tertiary) 290 - 310
CL to CI (Tertiary /Devonian Clays 260 - 380
CI-CH (Silurian) 220 - 250
CH (Basaltic) 180 - 210
Residual Friction Angle 80 – 180
Typical Range of Friction Angle
10
Friction Angle vs SPT
11
Relative Density vs SPT
12
Relative Density vs DCP and PSP
13
Q: What causes the
ultimate limit states?
A: Movement of the
wall
Ultimate Limit States – ALL Soils
14
Slip Lines
15
Required Horizontal Movement
16
17
Wall Movements
Wall Movements
18
Wall Movements
19
Ko = 1- sin φ for no back- slope
Ko = (1- sin φ) x (1+β) for back slope β
The above values apply only for normally consolidated soil.
For over-consolidated soil (residual soil or compacted fill)
Ko, oc = (1 - sin φ')OCR0.5
20
At Rest Coefficient K0
21
At Rest Coefficient K0 of Clays
Download This
22
http://www.cedd.gov.hk/eng/publications/geo/doc/manu_eg1.pdf
23
Rankine Earth Pressure Coefficients
24
RankineActive Earth Pressure
Coefficient
Rankine theory is based on
a limit equilibrium state in
the soil. It does not apply
when
• backfill slope is >φ/2
• wall is restrained at top
25
Rankine –Bell Active Earth Pressure that
includes effective cohesion c’
26
Coulomb Earth Pressure Coefficients
27
Coulomb Active Earth Pressure Coefficient
Coulomb theory
considers shear stresses
along the edges of the
failure wedge. A value
for wall friction must be
given.
28
Passive Earth Pressure Coefficients
Rankine theory usually under-estimates passive earth pressure
because the direction of the thrust is incorrectly assumed in
the theory
Coulomb theory significantly over-estimates the passive earth
pressure – the error is due to the assumption of a planar
surface, and increases rapidly with increasing value of wall
friction δ.
Comparing Ka and Kp values
29
30
Comparing Pa values
31
Coulomb Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient
32
Sokolovski Passive Pressure Coefficients
33
Sokolovski Passive Pressure Coefficients
34
Typical Values for vertical wall and horizontal backslope
35
AGS Journal Dec 1999
Slope Geometry
36
Braced excavations in Sand
37
Braced excavations
in ClayShort term
38
Braced excavations
in Clay Long Term
39
Wall Friction δ
Failure Surface
40
Trial Wedge
41
Trial Wedge
42
43
Trial Wedge
44
Trial Wedge
45
Terraced walls – get the spacing right
Where is the
critical failure
surface?
Gravity Wall Failures
46
Gravity Wall Failures
47
Compaction Stresses
48
Permeability of Backfill Material
49
Permeability of Backfill Material
50
Expansive Clay Behind
51
From Robert Lytton’s presentation
52
Expansive Clay Behind
From Robert Lytton’s presentation
Expansive Clay Behind
53
From Robert Lytton’s presentation
Expansive Clay Behind
54
From Robert Lytton’s presentation
55
56
Post and Waler
cantilever Walls with backfill
The End
thank you for your attention
Tanya Kouzmin
57