glenn hills middle smart teams smart school faculty meeting

RAISING STANDARDS FOR

ACADEMIC SUCCESS

Glenn Hills MiddleSchool

Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!Glenn H. Andrews

Principal

DEVELOPING A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY

Journey Toward Progress &

Academic Achievement

Professional Growth For Lifelong Learning

Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!

Glenn H. AndrewsKim Davis

Jackie Holley

TO PROVIDE ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS BY

ENSURING A POSITIVE EXPERIENCE TO BETTER PREPARE THEM FOR

SUCCESS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL

Our Mission


Glenn Hills Middle School

Organizational

Demographics

Student Body Total 713 Students

Free & Reduced Lunch 90%

Special Education Sub. 65 Students

Content Specialist 57 Teachers

Instructional Strategist 7 Teachers

Connections Teachers 12 Teachers

Academic Coaches 2 Coaches

Graduation Coaches 1 Coach

School Counselors 2 Counselors

Raising Standards Teachers 10 Teachers

Raising Standards Classrooms 9 Classrooms

Social Workers 1 Person


Points of Pride Second place in the Science Bowl

Implemented the EBIS Program

Successful CRCT Night (2007-2008)

College & University Themes

Implementation of CRCT Blitz

Implementation of Raising Standards (GHMS)

Participation in the Principal Advisory Commission

Participation in the Richmond 2010 Initiative

Met Standards on CRCT in Reading/Language Arts

Met Standards for Attendance/Participation (CRCT)

Lady SeminolesCounty

Champions2007-2008


Raising Standards For Academic Success

Organizational Flow Chart

“The Work of a Team is Only as

Good as its Effort”


JOURNEY TOWARD PROGRESS &

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Adequate Yearly Progress


Updated Projections2008-2009

Discipline and

Attendance2008-2009


J. Gordon HolleyFacilitator

STUDENT RETENTION SUMMARY

Journey Toward Academic Progress



Student Retention Summary

Age Equivalence

Eight Grader (13-14)

Seventh Grader (11-12)

Sixth Grader (10-11)

Grade (8) 12 Students

Age 15 84 Students Age 14 168 Students Age 13 04 Students Age 12

Grade (7) 01 Student Age 15 12 Students Age 14 65 Students Age 13 134 Students Age 12

Grade (6) 01 Student Age 14 08 Students Age 13 46 Students Age 12 167 Students Age 11 02 Students Age 10

34 Students are @ risk for drop-out at

the high school level

Students have been retained once or twice at the elementary level

673 students are on target for graduation at the high school level.

Projections2008-2009

Needs Improvement

Year (9)

2007-2008 Math OverviewAll Students

Y

Black

Y

Hispanic White SWD

Safe Harbor Y

Econ. Disadv.

Confid. Interval Y

AMO 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5

FAY 716 659 25 20 89 578

DID NOT MEET

40.2%

(288)

39.6%

(261)

44.0%

(11)

55.0%

(11)

67.4%

(60)

42.0%

(243)

Meet + Exceed

59.8%

(428)

60.4%

(398)

56.0%

(14)

45.0%

(9)

32.6%

(29)

58.0%

(335)


Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2007-2008 R/ELA OverviewAll Students *Y

Black

*Y

Hispanic White SWD

*N

Econ. Disadv.

*Y

AMO 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3

FAY 714.5 657.5 25 20 89 576.5

DID NOT MEET

16.0%

(114.5)

16.0%

(105)

18.0%

(4.5)

17.5%

(3.5)

56.7%

(50.5)

17.0%

(98)

Meet + Exceed

84.0%

(600)

84.0%

(552.5)

81.6%

(20.5)

82.5%

(16.5)

43.3%

(38.5)

82.9%

(478.5)


Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2007-2008 SCI and SS Overview

All Students Science

All StudentsSocial Studies

Total Tested

788 779

DID NOT MEET

51.9%(409)

78.56%(612)

Meet + Exceed

48.1%(379)

21.44%(167)


Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2008-2009 Math AYP ProjectionsAll

Students Black Hispanic White SWD Econ.

Disadv.

AMO 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5

Projected

FAY

708 673 10 15 65 594.72

Safe Harbor

Not an

Option

Not an

Option

Not an

Option

7.57 25.57 Not an

Option

AMO 421.26 400.44 6 8.92 38.68 353.85

AMO +10%

463.38 440.47 6.5 9.8 42.54 389.24


Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2008-2009 R/ELA AYP Projections

All Students

Black Hispanic White SWD Econ. Disadv.

AMO 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3

Projected

FAY

708 673 10 15 65 594.72

Safe Harbor

Not an

Option

Not an

Option

Not an

Option

Not an

Option

31.83 Not an

Option

AMO 518.96 493.30 7.33 10.99 47.64 435.92

Last year +10%

654.19 621.85 9.02 13.61 52.40 546.25


Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2008-2009 SCI and SS AYP Projections

All Students Science

All StudentsSocial Studies

Total Tested

702 702

Goal 52.19%(366.3)

23.58%(165.53)

Goal +10 58.19%(408.5)

25.93%(182.02)

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE DISCIPLINE PROGRAM THROUGH EFFECTIVE

INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES

Discipline Referral Review


2008-2009 School Year

Discipline2008-2009

Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2008-2009 Discipline

Discipline2008-2009

Needs

Improvement

Year (9)


# All % All # Major % Major # Minor % Minor

Students with 0 Referrals

657 93.59 % 657 93.59 % 702 100.00 %

Students with 1 Referrals

39 5.56 % 39 5.56 % 0.00 %

Students with 0 or 1 Referrals

696 99.15 % 696 99.15 % 702 100.00 %

Students with 2-5 Referrals

6 0.85 % 6 0.85 % 0.00 %

Students with 6+ Referrals

0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 0.00 %

Students with 9+ Referrals

0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 0.00 %

Discipline2008-2009

Needs

Improvement

Year (9)


Attendance2008-2009

Needs

Improvement

Year (9)

2008-2009 Attendance

# of students with one or more abs 264

# of students with two to four abs 114

# of students with five or more abs 30

# of SWD with one abs 11

# of SWD with two abs 3

# of SWD with three abs 2

# of SWD with five abs 2

# of SWD with more than 10 abs 1

11 Students are in Alt School

1 student has missed 11 days



Team Attendance

Team Sick Personal Professional Staff Development Total

Clemson 3 4 3 3.5 13.5

GA Southern 1 3.5 4.5

Augusta State 13 2.5 15.5

SC State 6 1 4.5 11.5

Paine 7 5.5 12.5

Tuskegee 1 1 2.5 4.5

GA Tech 2.5 2 4 8.5

UGA 2 1 1 4

U of Tennessee 1.5 2 2 4.5

Connections 9 1 1.5 2 13.5

Total 46 8 8 32 96

STRATEGIC PLANS FOR PROGRESS &

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Journey Toward Progress &

Academic Achievement

Smart Choices For Critical Times!


Kim DavisFacilitator

Common Mission, Vision, Values, and Goals

Assuring Achievement for ALL Students:

Systems for Prevention and Intervention

Collaborative Teaming Focused on Teaching

and Learning

Using Data to Guide Decision-making and

Continuous Improvement

Gaining Active Engagement from Family and

Community

Building Sustainable Leadership Capacity

Frequent Monitoring of Learning and

Teaching

Focused Professional Development

Eight Principles That Guide

Student Achievement In High Performing

Schools

Glenn Hills Middle SchoolAcademic and Instructional Priorities

Things We Do Well Things T

o

Impro

ve

• Accepted the Challenge: “Compromising Excellence is Not an Option”•Instructional Framework Foundation is in place.•Understand How to Utilize Data.

•Reaching the depth of the Instructional Framework and becoming pervasive, effective, and consistent in our delivery of instruction.•Compiling student data to gain a laser focus on instructional needs.•Focusing on “What do we do when students don’t meet standards?”

Professional Growth Plan Using SMART Goals

SSpecific & Strategic

What specifically am I trying to accomplish? What results do you want? How is it relevant to our mission?

MMeasurable

How will I measure when it is accomplished? Can the results be quantified?

AAchievable, Action-Oriented & Acceptable

Can I achieve this goal? Is it too high or too low? What are the action steps I will take to achieve it? Are all stakeholders, including myself, in agreement with the goal?

RRealistic & Results-Oriented

Is it possible and realistic within the specified timeframe? Are there any hindrances that are insurmountable?

TTime-Bound

When should the goal be completed? Does it have a starting point, ending point, and fixed duration?

Celebrating Success“Instructional Kings & Queens”

Mr. Streeter Mrs. Jackson

Instructional Kings & Queens

Mrs. Stark Mrs. Eastman

Incorporating the Instructional Framework using the Promethean Board

Raising Expectations in Physical Education

Coach Keep & Coach Mitchell

Developing Learning Teams Through Collaborative Planning

Professional Learning Communities

Smart Goal

Smart Teams

Smart School

Collaboration is a process we use to achieve shared goals.

Collaboration builds community, fuels motivation, renews the spirit, and enhances innovation.


Learning Teams Focus Through Collaborative Planning

Learning Teams

South Carolina State University

Clemson University

University of Georgia

Georgia Tech

Augusta State University

Paine College

Howard University

Morehouse College

Spellman College

Voorhees College

University of Virginia

Tuskegee Institute

Fort Valley State


Collaborative Planning Framework

Learning Teams

South Carolina State University

Clemson University

University of Georgia

Georgia Tech

Augusta State University

Pain College

Howard University

Morehouse College

Spellman College

Voorhees College

University of Virginia

Tuskegee Institute

Fort Valley State

The Process


15 Minutes

20 Minutes

30 Minutes

THE POWER OF DEVELOPING SMART GOALS

Developing Site Based Leadership

A Smart Way of ThinkingDeveloping A Professional Learning

Community

Developing Site Based Leadership Through

Smart Goal

Smart Goals

Smart Choices For Critical

Times

Compromising Excellence Is Not And Option!

glenn hills middle smart teams smart school faculty meeting

Education

needs improvement year

school year

option amo

minor students

high school level students

effective discipline

students social studies

standards teachers10