global competition for natural gas supplies - … · global competition for natural gas supplies...

- 1 -

Global Competition for Natural Gas SuppliesA Focus on the Pacific Basin LNG Market

Sophia Ruester

EE²Dresden University of Technology

Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management

Paris, February 22, 2007

- 2 -

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Structure of the Natural Gas Industry of Asia-Pacific Countries

3. Corporate Strategies

4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 3 -

Research Questions

The objective of the paper will be two-fold in

i) Corporate strategies

• Are natural gas supply structures in Asia really different from those in the other two large importing regions, i.e. Europe and North America?

• Which types of companies invest in Asia-Pacific natural gas infrastructures?

• Which corporate strategies can be identified?

ii) Competition policy

• Is supply security compatible with liberalized natural gas markets?

- 4 -

Agenda

1. Introduction



4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 5 -

World Natural Gas Consumption by Region

Source: BP (2006)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

bcm

North America Europe Asia Pacific

Continuous growth in Europe and in the Asia-Pacific region during the last decade.

- 6 -

Consumption in Selected Asia-Pacific Importing Countries

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

bcm

China India Japan South Korea Taiw an Source: BP (2006)

- 7 -

Strong Dependence on LNG in Asia

Asian natural gas importers rely strongly on LNG imports, pipeline infrastructure from Russia or Central Asia may only be constructed in the long-term.

Source: BP (2006)

- 8 -

Structural Data of Selected Asia-Pacific Countries

Source: BP (2006)

Major exporters

Major importers

- 9 -

Increasing Liquefaction Capacities in the Pacific Basin

4.4100Peru

4.51 00Papua New G.

Sum: 200.3+ 2774.527Total

001.12 (Kenai)US

9.62 (Sakhalin II)00Russia

26.91 (Bintulu)23.38 (Bintulu)Malaysia

29.49 (Tangguh, Bontang, Donggi, East Kalimantan, Senoro, Padang)

28.28 (Arun; Bontang)Indonesia

4.01 (Lumut)7.24 (Lumut)Brunei

47.012 (NWS; Gorgon; Timor; Pilbara; Sunrise; Browse; Pluto; Ichtys)

14.75 (NWS; Darwin)Australia

Total potential nominal

capacity (mtpa)

Trains under constr. / planned / proposed(sites)

Total nominal capacity(mtpa)

Trains operational (sites)

Country

- 10 -

Increasing Regasification Capacities in the Pacific Basin

2.7Quintero00Chile

5.0Floating Terminal, Karachi00Pakistan

3.0Yosu24.5Incheon, Pyeong-taek, Tongyoung, Kwangyang

South Korea

Sum: 284.4192.9Total

7.5Energia Costa Azul00Mexico

6.0Taichung, Tuntex7.2YunganTaiwan

tbaJoetsu, Wakayama15027 projectsJapan

12.5Dabhol, Dahej, Kochi7.5Dahej, HaziraIndia

54.5Guangdong, Fujijan, plus 13 additional sites proposed

3.7GuangdongChina

Total potent. nominal capacity(mtpa)

Plants under constr. / planned / proposed

Total nominal capacity(mtpa)

Plants operationalCountry

- 11 -

LNG Trade Movements – Middle East as Swing Producer

Source: BP (2006)

- 12 -

Varying Levels of Competition

- Benefits from liberalization: - Higher productivity- Lower prices- Greater output

- Extent to which Asian natural gas markets are liberalized varies:- Japan certain degree of wholesale competition in natural gas market, but only 14% of the

LNG comes from economies with competitive gas markets (Australia, US), other suppliers are state-owned vertically integrated monopolies

- South Korea: Kogas is the state-owned monopoly importer, privatization plans stalled (uncertainty about future company structure, strong opposition)

- Malaysia: very limited plans to liberalize natural gas industry- Indonesia: regulatory authorities downstream and upstream established (to introduce

competition); Law Concerning Oil and Natural Gas (2001): state-owned integrated monopoly Pertamina no longer has to be included in production sharing contracts

- Thailand: gas production open for foreign investment, state-owned gas company (holding transport and supply monopoly) buys domestic production from international oil companies at “international market prices”, the government is considering to open the network to TPA

- 13 -

Agenda

1. Introduction



4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 14 -

Shareholders of Liquefaction Projects

Competitive industries (US, Australia):

- Private companies are active in exploration & production and operate LNG export terminals

- US: ConocoPhilipps, Marathon- Australia: BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, Shell, Woodside Energy, Mitsubishi/Mitsui

Non-competitive industries:

- Public-Private-Partnerships: state-owned national energy company (with major share) and foreign private majors

- State interests are secured- Global majors have technical and operational knowledge, governments not participating

in the projects provides government with influence; information; learning- E.g. Brunei (Lumut): Governemnt (50%), Shell (25%), Mitsubishi (25%)- E.g. Malaysia (Bintulu): Petronas & local government (major share), Shell (15%), others- E.g. Indonesia (Bontang): Pertamina (main share), Total Fina Elf, BP, others

- 15 -

Shareholders of Regasification Projects

„Old World LNG Import Terminals“

- Owned by national companies- Japan: i) Gas companies: Tokyo Gas, Sendai Gas, Osaka Gas, etc.

ii) Electricity companies: Tokyo Electric, Chubu Electric, Kansai Electric, etc. - South Korea: Kogas (state-owned monopoly importer, privatization plans stalled)- Taiwan: Chinese Petroleum Corporation (CPC, controlling the whole gas business)

„New World LNG Import Terminals“

- Typical shareholder group: state-owned oil and gas company with a significant share and one or more local gas companies that also are major offtakers

- Participation of foreign private companies, e.g.:- India (Dahej LNG, 2005): Petronet, Indian companies, RasGas, GDF- India (Hazira LNG, 2004): Shell, Total- [China (Guangdong LNG, 2006): CNOOC, Guangdong Province, BP, others]

- 16 -

Vertical Integration

Traditional long-term contracts- Between LNG export project as seller and import project as buyer (so called Sales-

and-Purchase agreements with inflexible Take-or-Pay- and destination clauses)

Vertical integration via ownership of various stages of the value chain- Asian-based companies are increasingly engaging along all stages of the value

chain, e.g.:- Tokyo Electric, Tokyo Gas and Osaka Gas contracted own ships (IEEJ, 2005)- Russia (Sakhalin II): Mitsui and Mitsubishi hold significant shares

Extended value chain – vertical integration into power generation sector- Advantages: a part of the capacity is off taken, increasing the likelihood that the

terminal gets financed and built, co-development achieves synergies and cost savings

- Japan: gas companies are launching into the electricity generation sector and reverse (e.g. Osaka Gas active in wholesale electricity supply, Tokyo Electric active in wholesale gas supply, etc.)

- China: e.g. Guangdong terminal supplies two gas-fired power plants

- 17 -

Issues of Concern

Competitiveness of LNG- Current high price levels lead to decreasing competitiveness of natural gas in comparison to coal

- “Recent LNG price increases have delayed some LNG plans while the companies try to negotiate long-term LNG supply agreements.” (EIA, 2007)

Infrastructure- Often limited transmission and distribution networks

- Indonesia: networks have limited interconnectivity, plans to build four additional pipelines until 2010 („Integrated Gas Transportation System“)

- India: to a major part concentrated in producing regions, little interconnection between regions concerns that this situation will constrain consumption

- Japan: due to geographical constraints on the one hand and limited investment incentives on the other hand

- Financing and amortization of large scale projects

- Technical and operational knowledge

- 18 -

Agenda

1. Introduction



4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 19 -

Differing Supply Structures and Legal Frameworks in Asian Import Countries

State-owned Kogas(imports & distribution)

CNPC (upstream), Sinopec (downstream), CNOOC (offshore)

Gas/power companies, start integration along whole value chain

Players

City gas (heating, etc.)Industrial sectorPower generation sectorMain consuming sectors

33 bcm50 bcm81 bcmDomestic consumption

~ 050 bcm ~ 0 Domestic production

13%3%14%Share of natural gas

4 LNG plantsNortheastern gas fields, Guangdong LNG (2006)

27 LNG plantsSupply sources

Early decision to deve-lop a national transm. network rapid expan-sion of NG industry

West-East-Pipeline,

still lack in infrastructure in eastern/southeastern provinces

Very limited (terminals are closed to demand centers, networks like “islands”),

Transmission system

Privatization plan (Kogas) stalled (uncertainty about future company structure, opposition)

No liberalization process, lack of comprehensive regulatory framework

Under way (large volume customers are free of choice)

Liberalization

South KoreaChinaJapan(2005 values)

- 20 -

Source maps:

IEA (2006);

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/images/figure_chinabox.jpg

CHINA

(Start up: May 2006)

- 21 -

Agenda

1. Introduction



4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 22 -

Conclusions on Market Structure

Global competition for natural gas supplies!- We have to think in global terms analyzing natural gas markets, since demand is

increasing worldwide whereas domestic resources in Europe and North America are declining sellers‘ market

- Furthermore, exporting countries think about the trade-off between export and domestic production (e.g. Indonesia)

Are supply structures in Asia different from those of western economies?- Yes, since these countries rely strongly on deliveries via LNG and the natural gas markets

are partly still in an „infant stage“

What are typical company characteristics and strategies?- We still observe a huge influence of state-owned oil and gas companies in non-liberalized

countries, but:

- Increasing participation of foreign private firms and

- Companies are increasingly engaging along the whole value chain of LNG production

- 23 -

To Be Discussed During Further Research

Competition policy- PRO: “The creation of a competitive internal market will allow the Union’s energy companies to operate in a market of a larger dimension, which will improve their ability to contribute security of supply.” (EC, 2007)

- CON: “Kogas argues that at least one supply company should be under state control to provide security of supply.” (Wybrew-Bond/Stern, 2002)

- Asian natural gas markets are particularly lagging behind market-oriented restructuring, which is often justified by the need to secure supplies.

- Transition from regulated regional monopoly to fully liberalized market with stable regulatory regime could easily take 10 to 15 years and does only function in maturing markets (IGU, 2006)

- Power generation accounts for main gas demand share in Asia, hence any regulation of the gas market should be coordinated with the regulation of the electricity market

Is supply security compatible with liberalized natural gas markets?

- 24 -

Thank you very much for your attention!

Any questions or comments?

Contact:[email protected]

EE²Dresden University of Technology

Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management

- 25 -

Agenda

1. Introduction



4. Case Studies

5. Conclusions

Backup

- 26 -

References (Selected)

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (2006): Potential Growth of Natural Gas as a Clean Energy Source in APEC DevelopingCountries.

BP (2006): Statistical Review of World Energy.

CIEP (2006): The Paradigm Change in International Natural Gas Markets and the Impact on Regulation.

EIA (2007): Country Brief Analysis.

European Commission (2007): Energy Sector Inquiry. 10 January 2007.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2000): LNG Market at a Turning Point and Japan’s Options. 362nd Regular Meeting, Research Report.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2002): Liberalization of Gas Industries in Europe and the U.S. 373rd Regular Study Meeting, Research Report.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2003): Study of Changes in Patterns of LNG Tanker Operation. Research Report.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2004): Japanese Energy Policy and Regional Corporation. Paper presented at 2004 COE Summer International Seminar – Siberia and the Russian Far East in the 21st Century: Partners in the Community of Asia-Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University July 14-16, 2004.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2005): LNG Supply and Demand in Asia Pacific and Atlantic Markets. Research Report.

Institute of Energy Economics Japan (2006): Natural Gas and LNG Supply and Demand Trends in Asia Pacific and Atlantic Markets. Research Report.

Skeer, Jeffrey (2004): Asian LNG Trade and Gas Market Reform: Implications for Gas and Power Consumers. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Working Paper NG6.

Wybrew-Bond, Ian, and Jonathan Stern (2002): Natural Gas in Asia – The Challenges of Growth in China, India, Japan, and Korea. Oxford University Press.

- 27 -

Japan

EIA (2003, 19): Global LNG Market – Status and Outlook

- 28 -

South Korea


- 29 -

Taiwan


global competition for natural gas supplies - … · global competition for natural gas supplies...

Documents