global freshwater demand for electricity generation …...global freshwater demand for electricity...
TRANSCRIPT
Global freshwater demand for electricity
generation under low-carbon scenarios
Michela Bevione, Laurent Drouet, Massimo Tavoni
35th International Energy Workshop
1st June 2016, Cork, Ireland
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Summary
• Introduction
Overview on global water use
Water and energy nexus
• Implementation of the water module in WITCH
Data
Methodology
• Results
Baseline scenario
Policy and technology constraint scenarios
• Conclusions
1
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Introduction: Global water withdrawal by sectors
All economic sectors need water: agriculture, industry and most forms
of energy production are not possible without water.
2
Municipal 11%
Industry 19%
Agriculture 70%
Source: FAO Aquastat Database (2010)
Electricity generation:
15% of world’s total water
withdrawal (IEA,2010)
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
The energy and water nexus
• Energy and water are strongly interdependent, as water is required
throughout the whole electricity generation process.
• Electricity demand has been rapidly increasing in the last decades,
and a further electric-sector expansion could intensify the inter-
sectoral competition for freshwater.
• On the other hand, a lack in water supply would negatively affect
the power generation sector, e.g. in the 2009-summer one third of
the French nuclear power plant were put out of action because of
water shortages caused by a heat wave.
3
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
The WITCH model
WITCH (World Induced Technical Change Hybrid) is an integrated assessment
model designed to evaluate the impacts of climate policies on global and regional
economic systems.
4
LACA
USA
CAJAZ
SSA
KOSAU
INDIA
EASIA
CHINA MENA SASIA
TE OLDEURO
NEWEURO
The WITCH regions strategically interact using a game theoretic set-up.
For each region the model generates the optimal mitigation and adaptation
strategies to 2100, by maximizing the welfare of each region.
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
The production function
In each region the final good (Y)
is produced using capital (K),
labor (L) and energy services
(ES). Capital and labor are
aggregated using a Cobb-
Douglas production function.
This nest is then aggregated
with energy services with
a CES production function.
Each coalition will choose the
optimal inter-temporal mix of
technologies and R&D
investments in a strategic way.
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
The implementation of the water module
The water module has been implemented outside the optimization
process, by associating water demand intensities to the energy
technologies modeled in WITCH.
Water demand has been evaluated in terms of:
• Water withdrawal: the amount of water taken from a water body.
• Water consumption: the amount of water withdrawal that is not
returned to the source and no longer available for reuse (consumed
through evaporation)
Both freshwater and seawater demand is modeled in WITCH.
6
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Water demand in the power generation sector
Water is required throughout the whole electricity generation process, but only
the operational water demand is considered in this analysis.
7
Wind and solar energy:
Cleaning processes
Boiler feed and cooling (CSP only)
Hydroelectric generation:
Electricity generation
Reservoir storage
Thermoelectric and nuclear generation:
Boiler feed
Cleaning flue gases
Steam cooling and condensing
Fuel acquisition
Plant construction
Plant operation
Fuel disposal
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Thermoelectric and nuclear generation: cooling systems
Water demand of thermoelectric and nuclear plants varies according to cooling
technologies.
8
Freshwater
Saline water
Freshwater
Freshwater
-
Once-through
system
Recirculating
tower
Cooling pond
Dry tower
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Data: Cooling system breakdown
Kyle (2013) provides data on regional cooling system shares for:
- 2005: assigned to the base year plant stock in WITCH;
- future periods: assigned to new installations from 2010 on.
9
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Water intensities in thermoelectric and nuclear power
10
W𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 =𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑚3
𝑀𝑊ℎ
Nuclear
Gas
Oil & Biomass
Coal
Gas
Nuclear
Oil & Biomass
Coal
Hydropower
Source: Macknik (2012)
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Calculation methodology
Non-biomass renewables:
𝑊𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ,𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠 = 𝑄𝑒𝑙 ∗ 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
where:
• 𝑄𝑒𝑙 is the net electricity generation
• Withdrawal and consumption intensities are expressed in m3/MWh of net electricity
Thermoelectric and nuclear power plants:
𝑊𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ,𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠 = 𝑄𝑒𝑥𝑐 ∗ (
𝑗𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙
𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡, 𝑗𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙 ∗ 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑗𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙)
where:
• 𝑄𝑒𝑥𝑐 is the plant excess heat to be removed
• Withdrawal and consumption intensities expressed in m3/MWh of excess heat
• Cooling systems shares
An improvement in the energy efficiency of the plant implies a lower excess heat to the
condenser, and then a reduction in the cooling water demand.
11
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Baseline: Global water demand by technologies
12
Seawater
cooling
Wet tower
Hydropower
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Baseline: Uncertainty on global freshwater demand
13
Without
hydro
FAO
estimates
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
14
Baseline: Global freshwater demand by energy sources
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Baseline vs RCP37: Global freshwater demand
15
Climate policy: radiative forcing target at 3.7 W/m2 in 2100
-33%
-24%
-33%
-30%
-16%
-18%
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Baseline, RCP37 and RCP37_NukePO: Water demand
16
Technological constraint: nuclear phase-out obtained by assuming no further
investment into nuclear capacities after 2015
-42%
-40%
-8%
-7%
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Baseline, RCP37 and RCP37_NukePO: Electricity mix
17
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Conclusions (1)
• Water withdrawal and consumption strongly depend on the global
electricity demand and generation mix.
• The renovation of the power plant stock produces reductions in
global freshwater demand as new plants have higher efficiencies in
both energy and water usage.
• Hydropower plays a dominant role in water consumption and the
uncertainty on its consumption coefficient drastically intensify the
uncertainty on global water consumption estimation.
18
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Conclusions (2)
• The introduction of a mitigation policy (RCP37) generates a
reduction on both freshwater withdrawal and consumption, as a
consequence of the reduction in the energy demand.
• The combination of the RCP37 policy and the nuclear phase-out
generates a reduction in freshwater withdrawal and consumption,
due to the higher share of electricity produced through low water-
demanding energy sources (gas, wind and solar).
19
Global freshwater demand for electricity generation under low-carbon scenarios
Thanks for your
attention!
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework
Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under grant agreement n. 308329