global methanol outlook 2016 - methanol · pdf filekaveh methanol co new facility 2,300 medium...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2016 IHS
METHANOL
FEBRUARY 2016
Marc Alvarado –Associate Director, 281-752-3271, [email protected]
© 2016 IHS
AGENDA FEBRUARY 2016
2
• Demand
• MTO
• US
• Supply
• North American projects
• Tradeflows
• Iranian Sanctions
• Pricing and Margins
• Methanol and Crude Oil Current Conditions
Q&A
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Demand
3
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
2010 Global Methanol Demand By End-Use
4
Formaldehyde 34%
Acetic Acid 11%
MTBE/TAME 12%
MMA 2%
Gasoline Blending
7%
Biodiesel 4%
DME 9%
Methylamines 4%
Chloromethanes 3%
Solvents 6%
Others 8%
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
2015 Global Methanol Demand By End-Use
5
Formaldehyde 27%
Acetic Acid 9%
MTBE/TAME 8%
MMA 2%
Gasoline Blending
9%
Biodiesel 3%
DME 8%
Methylamines 3%
Chloromethanes 2%
MTO 18%
Solvents 4%
Others 7%
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Strong Demand Growth into MTO - Existing Plants
MTO/P Company Location Time on stream Max. Methanol
Consumption Methanol Source
Zhongyuan PC Puyang,
Henan
Oct. 2011
600
Long term contract
with plants near by
and merchant market
Fund Energy
(Ningbo)
Ningbo,
Zhejiang
April. 2013
1800
Contract and merchant
market
Nanjing Wison Nanjing,
Jiangsu
Oct. 2013
900
Self supply and
merchant market
Shandong Shenda
(Levima Group)
Tengzhou,
Shandong Dec. 2014 1200
Long term contract
with nearby plants and
merchant market
Zhejiang New
Energy
Jiaxing,
Zhejiang
April. 2015
1800
Contract and merchant
market
Shandong
Hengtong
Tengzhou,
Shangdong July. 2015 900
Long term contract
with nearby plants and
merchant market
Shenhua Xiwan Yuli, Shaanxi Dec. 2015 1800
Long term contract
with nearby plants and
merchant market
Total Max.
methanol demand 9000 Kt
6
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
New US Methanol Demand
• Thus far, basically only fully integrated projects that consume methanol:
- ZeoGas – MTG
- EmberClear – MTG
- BASF – GTP
• Only exceptions are:
- Momentive adding 90 Kta of methanol demand in formaldehyde
- Mitsubishi potentially adding 170 Kta of methanol demand in MMA
- Celanese adding 75 Kta of methanol demand in acetic acid
7
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Supply
8
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Improving Methanol Operating Rates
40%
55%
70%
85%
100%
0
40
80
120
160
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Demand Total Capacity Operating Rate Effective Operating Rate
$/ M
etr
ic T
on
Op
era
tin
g R
ate
Global Methanol Supply Demand
9
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Changed Landscape: US Natural Gas
10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
Associated gas Coalbed methane Conventional Shale Tight sands
US Natural Gas Supply
Bc
f P
er
Da
y
Source: EIA; IHS Energy
• Production from unconventional sources will continue to expand rapidly
• By the end of the forecast period, gas production from shale gas and tight oil plays
will represent over 75% of total gas production
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
2019 World Methanol Industry Production Cash Cost
11
AFR Avg
MDE Avg
NAM Avg
NEA Avg
SAM Avg
SEA Avg
0 20 40 60 80 100
Do
lla
rs P
er
Me
tric
To
n
World Cost Curve: Methanol
(Price Basis = IHS, Cost Basis = Plant Gate,
Operating Rate Basis = IHS Baseline)
Cumulative Production - Million Metric Tons
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Tradeflows
12
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Global Methanol Trade Shift – South America
4.3 Mt 1.1 Mt
2014
13
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Global Methanol Trade Shift – South America
4.3 Mt 1.1 Mt
2014
2015
4.0 Mt
1.8 Mt
14
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Global Methanol Trade Shift – 2020 North & South America
0.98 Mt
5.0 Mt 1.2 Mt
15
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Global Methanol Trade Shift – 2020 North & South America
0.98 Mt
5.0 Mt 1.2 Mt
+6.2 Mt 0.65 Mt
16
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
An Update on Iranian Sanctions
17
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Iran: Sanctions Update
• Iran and the P5+1 countries reached a historic agreement on 14 July
2015 that curbs Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief
• The agreement has now effectively passed US Congress
• The US and Iran adopted the nuclear agreement on the official
“Adoption Day”, 18 October 2015
• “Implementation Day” is likely to be between in the first half of 2016, IF
Iran satisfies the IAEA it has fulfilled its nuclear obligations
• However, these are only part of a network of sanctions; earlier US
sanctions will remain in place, as will congressional restrictions on US
companies and their subsidiaries' ability to do business in Iran
18
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Iran: Impact on the Methanol Market
• Short-term:
• Rather than being mainly restricted to China and India, Iran could export to other
markets, maximising its netbacks
• This is likely to have the effect of minimising regional price differentials
• Plant reliability could improve if Iran has better access to items such as spare parts,
catalyst charges etc.
• Current margins are breakeven at best for importing into China at a price of $215 CFR
• Longer-term:
• Iran could add to its current 5m tpa methanol capacity
• Existing projects could be re-invigorated
• New projects, potentially with overseas finance and know-how, could be implemented
• By 2025-2030 Iran’s methanol capacity could grow by more than 10m tpa
19
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Projects Announced in Iran
20
Company Project Capacity in Kta Timeframe
Kaveh Methanol Co New Facility 2,300 Medium Term
Marjan PC New Facility 1,650 Medium Term
Fanavaran PC Expansion 1,650 Long Term
Kharg Expansion 1,400 Long Term
Sabalan PC New Facility 1,650 Long Term
Siraf Energy Invest. New Facility 1,650 Long Term
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Pricing and
Margins
21
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
US METHANOL PRICING
22
The 4Q 2015 US spot methanol price was $269 vs $415 in 4Q of 2014 and that is
approximately $80 lower than we expected six months ago.
Our outlook for 2016 pricing is $263 vs $327 in 2015.
In general the US methanol market came under significant pressure at the end of
2015.
• WHY?
• Planned: new capacity onstream in the US
• Environmental: further falls in the crude oil price
• Unplanned: postponement of some MTO unit start-ups in China
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Global Methanol Demand Crude Derivatives vs.
Traditional
23
0
20
40
60
80
100
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Traditional derivatives MTO/MTP Fuel
Millio
n M
etr
ic T
on
s
Global Methanol Consumption
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
WTI Brent
Energy Price Trends
US
Do
lla
rs P
er
Ba
rre
l
The crude oil supply glut is not expected to be absorbed
before late 2016
24
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol vs Crude Oil
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Cru
de
Oil
, D
oll
ars
Pe
r B
arr
el
Me
tha
no
l, D
oll
ars
Pe
r M
etr
ic T
on
Crude Oil
Methanol
Methanol vs. Crude Oil Pricing
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Lower Production Costs and Oversupply are Expected to
Keep Coal Prices Low
26
0
30
60
90
120
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Do
lla
rs p
er
me
tric
to
n
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Affordability Into DME
27
0
140
280
420
560
700
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0 200 400 600 800 1,000
Me
tha
no
l, D
oll
ars
Pe
r M
etr
ic T
on
DM
E, D
oll
ars
Pe
r M
etr
ic T
on
Propane, Dollars Per Metric Ton
DME valued at energy
DME valued at volume
equivalence to propane
2016
NEA Forecast price
range for propane
Equivalent methanol
value based on 1.4
metric tons of methanol
per metric ton of DME
Global Dimethyl Ether Energy Value
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Affordability Into Gasoline
28
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Me
tha
no
l P
ric
e, D
oll
ars
Pe
r M
etr
ic T
on
Gasoline Price, Dollars Per Gallon
Equivalent energy
price for methanol
Equivalent
volume price for
methanol. One
gallon methanol
equals one
Forecast price range of
gasoline, 2016
Methanol Values Into Direct Gasoline Blending
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Affordability
29
265
2,1
31
2,0
03
1,8
09
385
2,2
38
1,8
84
1,7
75
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
Acetic Acid Formaldehyde DME MTO
RM
B / m
t
December 2015 November 2015
China Spot Methanol December 2015 China Spot Methanol November 2015
Domestic Methanol Spot Affordability: December 2015 vs. November 2015 (based on
spot domestic derivative pricing)
China Spot Methanol:
December '15 - RMB 1767
November '15 - RMB 1885
Descriptor: Price in columns indicates what the maximum price is for methanol based on cash cost and price for each
derivative before consumers operate at a loss
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol Affordability Into MTO
30
100
200
300
400
500
Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15
Breakeven Methanol Price Domestic Spot Methanol
US
D p
er
metr
ic t
on
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15
Marg
in In
dex
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
How has the low oil price affected methanol demand?
31
DME Gasoline blending
MTO/MTP MTBE
• Profitability poor
• 2015 demand
essentially flat
• Low growth
• But much blending on
a volumetric basis
• Issue of ongoing
profitability: may reduce
operating rates
• Especially for facilities
with no units downstream
of propylene
• Profitability eroded
• But gasoline demand
healthy given low oil
price
• Healthy growth 2014-15
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Methanol prices 2010 - 2020
32
FEBRUARY 2016
100
200
300
400
500
600
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Do
lla
rs P
er
Me
tric
To
n
US Spot, Gulf Coast Rotterdam Spot, T2 China Spot, CFR
Methanol Prices
© 2016 IHS
Conclusions
• Demand growth in 2016-2017 depends heavily on the MTO market:
• New MTO capacity start-up
• MTO Operating rates/profitability
• Prices forecast to recover slightly but stay in a narrow range in 2016-2017
• New North American projects announced but unlikely to come on stream
between now and 2020
• If the Iranian sanctions are permanently suspended:
• Iran will be free to export to countries other than China and this will reduce regional price
differentials
• Iran will progress its methanol projects and potentially develop new projects
33
FEBRUARY 2016
© 2016 IHS
Q & A
34
FEBRUARY 2016