global warming 2003 style agriculture
TRANSCRIPT
AGRICULTURE:AGRICULTURE:GLOBAL WARMING’SGLOBAL WARMING’S
VICTIMVICTIMCAUSE CAUSE
ANDAND
SOLUTIONSOLUTION
Agriculture: Agriculture: Global Warming VictimGlobal Warming Victim
Food and Agriculture
Association of The United
States
This depiction of linear trends in the Palmer Drought Severity Index from 1948 to 2002 shows drying (reds and pinks) across much of Canada, Europe, Asia, and Africa and moistening (green) across parts of the United States, Argentina, Scandinavia, and western Australia. (Illustration courtesy Aiguo Dai and the American Meteorological Society.)
““Global Warming Global Warming Contributes to Australia’s Contributes to Australia’s Worst Drought”Worst Drought”
During 2002, worst drought since records During 2002, worst drought since records began in 1910began in 1910
Temperatures highest since 1950Temperatures highest since 1950 Increased evaporationIncreased evaporation Loss of soil moisture and vegetation dryingLoss of soil moisture and vegetation drying
Concentrated at Murray-Darling Basin – Concentrated at Murray-Darling Basin – nation’ s agriculture heartlandnation’ s agriculture heartland
Karoly et. al. 2003Karoly et. al. 2003
Temperature
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Temp Above Avg.
Precipitation
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year
Precipitation
ConsequencesConsequences Decreased production of wheat, barley, cotton, Decreased production of wheat, barley, cotton,
and canolaand canola Production of major winter crops was set to fall Production of major winter crops was set to fall
by 14.8 million tons by 14.8 million tons Gross value of farm production was forecasted Gross value of farm production was forecasted
to fall by 21%to fall by 21% Australian Bureau of Ag Resource EconomicsAustralian Bureau of Ag Resource Economics
Projected temperature increases in Australia Projected temperature increases in Australia between 1*C and 6*C and 45% decrease in between 1*C and 6*C and 45% decrease in stream flow in Murray-Darling Basin by 2070stream flow in Murray-Darling Basin by 2070
CSIROCSIRO
Europe 2005Europe 2005 France – swarms of locusts hatching because of France – swarms of locusts hatching because of
drought. One farmer stated, “ They eat everytihing that drought. One farmer stated, “ They eat everytihing that is green, leaving only stalks, and when they have is green, leaving only stalks, and when they have finished, they leave some kind of scent so that cattle do finished, they leave some kind of scent so that cattle do not want to graze what is left.”not want to graze what is left.”
Spain – worst drought since records began in 1947, Spain – worst drought since records began in 1947, wave of forest fires, farmers demanding emergency help wave of forest fires, farmers demanding emergency help as crops fail and parched pastures no longer sustain as crops fail and parched pastures no longer sustain livestocklivestock
Portugal – worst dry spell since the 1940’s, National Portugal – worst dry spell since the 1940’s, National Farmer’s Union estimated losses near 1 billion euros, Farmer’s Union estimated losses near 1 billion euros, fires destroyed 140,000 hectares of forest and killed 15 fires destroyed 140,000 hectares of forest and killed 15 people, farm income expected to fall 35%people, farm income expected to fall 35%
Italy – several people dead due to heat, swarms of Italy – several people dead due to heat, swarms of locusts destroying vineyardslocusts destroying vineyards
Heatwave of 2003 – 15,000 people diedHeatwave of 2003 – 15,000 people died
GLOBAL CROP PRODUCTION REVIEW, 2005Prepared by USDA’s Joint Agricultural Weather Facility
CanadaCanada
General increase in temps, drought, soil General increase in temps, drought, soil compactation, changes in disease and compactation, changes in disease and insect pressureinsect pressure
Cool season vegetables as indicators, they Cool season vegetables as indicators, they are more adversely effected by tempsare more adversely effected by temps Yields have decreased from 40’s to 80’s in Yields have decreased from 40’s to 80’s in
spite of modern cultivars and production spite of modern cultivars and production practicespractices
McKeown et. al. McKeown et. al.
Drought Reporter
http://droughtreporter.unl.edu/map.jsp?Cmd=filter&scn=nv&c_ag=on&c_fi=on&c_wa=on&c_so=on&c_en=on&c_ot=on&src=&daterange=year
United StatesUnited States No reliable precipitation projections More frequent floods and droughts New technologies to prepare for widespread drought and crop-New technologies to prepare for widespread drought and crop-
pounding stormspounding storms
UC Berkeley team estimates that a five degree temperature rise -projected to occur in the next 30-50 years at current rates of carbon dioxide accumulation in the atmosphere - could result in $15 billion to $30 billion in annual damage to American crops.
McBroom, 2001
““Our whole farming system really contributes to a lot of global Our whole farming system really contributes to a lot of global warming and it could be made to be much more sustainable” warming and it could be made to be much more sustainable” Francis Thicke, Fairfield FarmerFrancis Thicke, Fairfield Farmer
Lorentzen, 2006Lorentzen, 2006
Agriculture: Agriculture: Global Warming CauseGlobal Warming Cause
Agriculture’s Agriculture’s Contribution to Global Contribution to Global WarmingWarming
Agriculture is estimated to be responsible Agriculture is estimated to be responsible for 9% of total greenhouse gas emissionsfor 9% of total greenhouse gas emissions
Methane (CH4) EmissionsMethane (CH4) Emissions
Agriculture is the main contributor to Agriculture is the main contributor to CH4 emissions.CH4 emissions.
Agriculture is responsible for 43% of Agriculture is responsible for 43% of methane emissions followed by waste methane emissions followed by waste (34%) and energy (21%).(34%) and energy (21%).
Major Cause of Methane Major Cause of Methane Emissions in AgricultureEmissions in Agriculture
Livestock manure is mainly composed of organic Livestock manure is mainly composed of organic matter that, in the absence of oxygen, is decomposed matter that, in the absence of oxygen, is decomposed by bacteria and in this way produces methane.by bacteria and in this way produces methane.
Manure management accounts for about 71% of CH4 Manure management accounts for about 71% of CH4 emissions resulting from agricultural activity.emissions resulting from agricultural activity.
The amount of methane emitted by livestock is The amount of methane emitted by livestock is calculated by the number of animals multiplied by an calculated by the number of animals multiplied by an emission rate per animal. The emission rate mainly emission rate per animal. The emission rate mainly depends on the type of digestive system of the animal depends on the type of digestive system of the animal and its feed intake.and its feed intake.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) EmissionsNitrous Oxide (N2O) Emissions
Agriculture is also the main source of Agriculture is also the main source of N2O emissions and is responsible for N2O emissions and is responsible for some 52% of total N2O emissions, some 52% of total N2O emissions, compared with 27% from industrial compared with 27% from industrial processes, 16% from energy use, and processes, 16% from energy use, and 4% from land use and forestry. 4% from land use and forestry.
Causes of Nitrous Oxide Causes of Nitrous Oxide Emissions in AgricultureEmissions in Agriculture
N2O emissions from agriculture are N2O emissions from agriculture are cause from three sources:cause from three sources:
1) direct emissions from agricultural soils and 1) direct emissions from agricultural soils and animal production systemsanimal production systems
2) indirect emissions which take place after 2) indirect emissions which take place after nitrogen is lost from the field or after leaching or nitrogen is lost from the field or after leaching or the runoff of nitratesthe runoff of nitrates
3) emissions resulting from agricultural burning.3) emissions resulting from agricultural burning.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) EmissionsEmissions
Agriculture contributes to CO2 emissions in the Agriculture contributes to CO2 emissions in the way of burning fields and the burning of fossil way of burning fields and the burning of fossil fuels in trucks and equipment.fuels in trucks and equipment.
Although agriculture is a contributor to CO2 Although agriculture is a contributor to CO2 emissions, it doesn’t have its own category for emissions, it doesn’t have its own category for carbon dioxide emissions. Agriculture’s CO2 carbon dioxide emissions. Agriculture’s CO2 emissions get grouped into the transportation emissions get grouped into the transportation category but is estimated to be about 1.6% of category but is estimated to be about 1.6% of total CO2 emissions. total CO2 emissions.
Main Agricultural Cause Main Agricultural Cause of Global Warmingof Global Warming
Nearly 1/5 of all global warming causing emissions come from Nearly 1/5 of all global warming causing emissions come from animal agriculture, more than the cumulative impact of all the animal agriculture, more than the cumulative impact of all the transportation in the world. transportation in the world.
This effect occurs because animal wastes and digestion produces This effect occurs because animal wastes and digestion produces methane and nitrous oxide gases, which have 23 and 246 times methane and nitrous oxide gases, which have 23 and 246 times the heat trapping of carbon dioxide.the heat trapping of carbon dioxide.
The livestock industry is also the leading cause of deforestation of The livestock industry is also the leading cause of deforestation of the rainforest. 70% of the former Amazon Rainforest is currently the rainforest. 70% of the former Amazon Rainforest is currently devoted to animal agriculture. Because trees and other plants devoted to animal agriculture. Because trees and other plants remove greenhouse gasses from the atmosphere, deforestation remove greenhouse gasses from the atmosphere, deforestation accelerates the pace of global warmingaccelerates the pace of global warming
Slash and Burn Slash and Burn AgricultureAgriculture
Slash and burn practices are the leading Slash and burn practices are the leading cause of deforestation, and one of the cause of deforestation, and one of the major agricultural contributors to CO2 major agricultural contributors to CO2 emissions. emissions.
Smallholder farmers slash and burn a small area of forest to run Smallholder farmers slash and burn a small area of forest to run their livestock and plant their crops, but in a few short years the their livestock and plant their crops, but in a few short years the land is no longer fertile and the farmers must move on and slash land is no longer fertile and the farmers must move on and slash and burn a new piece of the rainforest. and burn a new piece of the rainforest.
Agriculture: Agriculture: Global Warming MitigatorGlobal Warming Mitigator
Agriculture Agriculture Part of the SolutionPart of the Solution
Carbon SequestrationCarbon Sequestration Largest global terrestrial sequestration poolLargest global terrestrial sequestration pool Forest SequestrationForest Sequestration
Biofuel/EthanolBiofuel/Ethanol BiomassBiomass
Build with woodBuild with wood Fuel for electricityFuel for electricity
Positive Agricultural Positive Agricultural PracticesPractices
PracticePractice EffectEffect
Conservation or riparian Conservation or riparian buffersbuffers
Increased Carbon StorageIncreased Carbon Storage
Conservation Tillage on Conservation Tillage on CroplandCropland
Enhance Carbon Enhance Carbon Sequestration/Reduce Sequestration/Reduce EmissionsEmissions
Grazing Land ManagementGrazing Land Management Enhance Carbon Enhance Carbon Sequestration/Reduce Sequestration/Reduce EmissionsEmissions
Conservation and Conservation and Riparian AreaRiparian Area
Grasses or trees Grasses or trees planted along planted along streams and streams and croplands to croplands to prevent soil erosion prevent soil erosion and nutrient runoff and nutrient runoff into waterwaysinto waterways
Conservation and Conservation and Riparian AreaRiparian Area
Source: Colorado State
Conservation TillageConservation Tillage
> 30% crop residue > 30% crop residue remainsremains
Less Soil Less Soil Disturbance/ Disturbance/ Carbon Carbon AccumulationAccumulation
No till; minimum No till; minimum till; ridge till; mulch till; ridge till; mulch tilltill
Conservation TillageConservation Tillage
Use 50% Less FuelUse 50% Less Fuel Increases Soil Increases Soil
CarbonCarbon Reduces NReduces N22OO
Grazing Land Grazing Land ManagementManagement
Grazing Routes Grazing Routes Carbon Through Carbon Through Digestive TractDigestive Tract
25-50% of Carbon 25-50% of Carbon Returned to Land Returned to Land
Remainder Emitted as Remainder Emitted as COCO22 & CH & CH44
Management for Management for Increased Plant Increased Plant Productivity Increases Productivity Increases Soil CarbonSoil Carbon
Biofuel/Biomass Biofuel/Biomass ProductionProduction
Displaces Fossil Displaces Fossil FuelsFuels Biofuel for DieselBiofuel for Diesel Ethanol for GasEthanol for Gas
Displaces Production Displaces Production of Energy Intensive of Energy Intensive ProductsProducts Wood for SteelWood for Steel
ActivityActivity SequestrationSequestration
Rate Rate (MT/acre/Yr.)(MT/acre/Yr.)
Time Prior to Time Prior to SaturationSaturation
ReferenceReference
(EPA)(EPA)AfforestationAfforestation 0.6 – 2.60.6 – 2.6 90 – 120+ years 90 – 120+ years Birdsey 1996Birdsey 1996
ReforestationReforestation 0.3 – 2.10.3 – 2.1 90 – 120+ years90 – 120+ years Birdsey 1996Birdsey 1996
Changes in Changes in Forest Mangmt.Forest Mangmt.
0.6 - 0.80.6 - 0.8 Wood Products Wood Products Eliminate Eliminate SaturationSaturation
Row 1996Row 1996
Conversion of Conversion of Riparian BuffersRiparian Buffers
0.1 – 0.30.1 – 0.3 Not CalculatedNot Calculated Lal et al. 1999Lal et al. 1999
Convert to Convert to Reduced TillageReduced Tillage
0.2 – 0.30.2 – 0.3 15 – 50 years15 – 50 years Lal et al. 1999Lal et al. 1999
West; Post 2002West; Post 2002
Changes in Changes in Grazing MangmtGrazing Mangmt
0.2 – 0.50.2 – 0.5 25 – 50 years25 – 50 years Follet et al. 2001Follet et al. 2001
Biofuel for Biofuel for Fossil FuelFossil Fuel
1.3 – 1.51.3 – 1.5 Saturation does Saturation does not occurnot occur
Lal et al. 1999Lal et al. 1999
Proposed Benefits of Organic Farming
•Assuming sequestration rates of 3500 lbs of soil carbon per acre/ft per year.
Carbon CreditsCarbon Credits
Chicago Climate ExchangeChicago Climate Exchange CCX AgriculturalCCX Agricultural
Soil Carbon OffsetsSoil Carbon Offsets CCX AgriculturalCCX Agricultural
Methane Emissions OffsetsMethane Emissions Offsets About $4/CFIAbout $4/CFI
European Climate ExchangeEuropean Climate Exchange India?India?
States with CCX Projects
SummarySummary
Agriculture Production Patterns Will Be Forced to Change
Agriculture Producer May Face Greater Risks
As an Industry Eliminating All GHG Pollution Is Not Feasible
Agriculture Can Be Carbon Neutral