going global 2016: times higher education world reputation rankings 2016

43
Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016 Results launch Phil Baty Editor, Times Higher Education World University Rankings Duncan Ross Director, Data and Analytics, Times Higher Education

Upload: british-council

Post on 17-Feb-2017

289 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Results launch

Phil Baty

Editor, Times Higher Education World University Rankings

Duncan Ross

Director, Data and Analytics, Times Higher Education

Page 2: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 3: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Times Higher Education: the leading global authority since 1971

Page 4: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings

500,000 data points on

1,200 leading

universities

801 universities ranked

from 70 countries

13 separate

performance indicators,

covering five core

aspects of a university’s

mission

17 million unique users

& 60 million page views

of www.thewur.com

2004 2015-6

Page 5: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The first THE World Reputation Rankings 2011

“The reputation rankings are unashamedly

based on nothing more than academics’

subjective judgement…

… it is, however, the considered, expert

judgement of senior, published academics

– the people best placed to know the most

about excellence in our universities.”

Page 6: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“What matters most is how you see yourself”

Page 7: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“Reputation is itself an identifiable market – one that matters and has material effects.” Simon Marginson, March 2011

The academic

Page 8: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“The strength of a university’s brand both depends upon and feeds into the success of the institution itself. If a university thrives, the value of its brand will increase, in turn creating a virtuous feedback loop as academics, students and funding are drawn in. But the reverse is also true: failures of compliance or strategy can tarnish and at worst destroy this key asset, trapping the institution in a downward spiral.” David Copping, Farrer & Co, March 2013

The lawyer

Page 9: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“Many academics find it a distasteful concept, I think partly because it connotes ideas of superficiality and shallowness and it doesn’t really speak to the substance of what we do... “Whether you like it or not, universities have a brand – its an image that people associate with us. And we want that image to be as positive as possible.” Meric Gertler, President, University of Toronto

The university leader

Page 10: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“Whenever the target audience of an organisation faces a choice of alternative competitors, branding is incredibly important for justifying price, avoiding commoditisation, attracting and retaining talent, and ultimately, resisting rivals.” Ian Pearman, chief executive, Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO

The advertising guru

Page 11: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 12: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 13: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The Times Higher Education

Academic Reputation Survey 2016

• The most rigorous worldwide survey of academics

• Asking specifically about reputation

• Wording and approach checked by leading survey company

• Academics chosen at random

• Responses weighted to ensure they reflect worldwide opinion

Page 14: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Academic reputation survey

We ask four questions:

• The best research universities in the world

• The best teaching universities in the world

• Additional research universities in your country

• Additional teaching universities in your country

Page 15: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Academic reputation survey

• Respondents are mainly academics and research staff

• Small, but significant, group of leaders

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Academic staff Research staff Seniorinstitutionalleadership

Page 16: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Academic reputation survey

• Voters can choose up to 15 institutions to vote for

• Votes are not ordered

• Choice of more than 3 000 universities

• Any other institution can be added using free text entry

Page 17: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Academic Reputation Survey

Charity donation of $1 per completed survey

Camfed Camfed is an international non-profit organization tackling poverty and inequality by supporting girls in the poorest rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa to go to school and succeed, and empowering young women to step up as leaders of change.

United World Schools United World Schools is dedicated to improving the educational opportunities for the world’s poor and marginalised children. They build schools and support communities by providing a free basic education for these children.

STIR education STIR seeks to improve learning levels for 40 million children by building a movement of 1 million teachers, motivated to improve their practice and influence their peers and the system

Page 18: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

How we ensure its accuracy

• We chose from the list of active researchers in Elsevier’s Scopus database

• We chose randomly

• No “nominations” are permitted

• We balance by geography

• Using OECD/UNESCO data on the number of researchers by country

• Balance survey invites

• Additionally weight responses

• We aim to balance by broad subject category

• Free text entries are exhaustively evaluated

Page 19: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

Arts andHumanities

SocialSciences

Businessand

Economics

Clinical andHealth

LifeSciences

PhysicalSciences

Engineering ComputerSciences

10 323 Voters 144 656 votes

Top languages

English Chinese Japanese Russian Spanish

Page 20: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The results 2016

Page 21: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

10th. The California Institute of Technology, US

9th. Columbia University, US

8th. Yale University, US

7th. Princeton University, US

6th. University of California, Berkeley, US

Page 22: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The THE World Reputation Rankings 5th place:

University of Oxford, UK

Page 23: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The THE World Reputation Rankings 4th place:

University of Cambridge, UK

Page 24: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The THE World Reputation Rankings 3rd place:

Stanford University, US

Page 25: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The THE World Reputation Rankings 2nd place:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Page 26: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The THE World Reputation Rankings 1st place:

Harvard University

Page 27: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Six global superbrands

Page 28: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 29: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 30: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 31: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 32: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Qiu Yong, President, Tsinghua University

“Essential to recruit faculty of world class calibre” Chen Ning Yang, Nobel laureate in physics; Andrew Chi-Chih Yao, a recipient of the

Turing Award; Shing-Tung Yau, a Field’s medalist

“Internationalistaion” More than 40 per cent of undergraduates and 60 per cent of PhD students gain

overseas study experience before graduation. It enrols 3,380 international students from

119 countries. First group of students to US 100 years ago.

“Dedicated to making greater contributions to society” Solutions to our most pressing socio-economic challenges. Eg. new technology for safer

nuclear power generation.

“Social responsibility among students” Universities should endeavour to instil in talented young people a spirit of innovation and

a desire to contribute to society.

Page 33: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

“We’ve had a highly Anglo-Saxon view of higher

education for many years and that can’t be sustained

for much longer.”

Paul Blackmore, professor of higher education at the Policy Institute at King’s College London

Page 34: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Superbrands:

where do they get support?

• One of the features of the superbrand Universities is the breadth of their support

• All receive large votes from every region

• Harvard receives stronger recognition from Asia than from North America

Page 35: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Research superbrands

We see differing views from different continents

Overall Africa Europe North America

Harvard

MIT

Stanford

Cambridge

Oxford

Berkeley

Page 36: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Teaching superbrands

Teaching and research are viewed differently

Overall Africa Europe North America

Harvard

Cambridge

Stanford

MIT

Oxford

Berkeley

Page 37: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Eurovision effect: do countries vote for themselves?

There is some evidence that academics vote for universities in their country or region

Some countries rely heavily on this

Others are hugely international

Page 38: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University

MIT0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University

MIT

Stanford

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University

MIT

Stanford

Cambridge

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University

MIT

Stanford

Cambridge

Oxford

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Arts and Humanities

Social Sciences

Business and Economics

Clinical and Health

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering

Computer Science

Harvard University

MIT

Stanford

Cambridge

Oxford

Berkeley

What subjects are they

known for?

We see some very different styles of reputation

Which universities are seen as the most “well rounded”?

Page 39: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Universities in Africa

African higher education still has a

reputational hill to climb

Although not in the top 100

institutions, the top 10 African

universities are (in alphabetical

order)

Ain Shams University Egypt

American University in Cairo Egypt

Cairo University Egypt

Makerere University Uganda

University of Cape Town South Africa

University of Ibadan Nigeria

University of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa

University of Pretoria South Africa

University of Stellenbosch South Africa

University of the Witwatersrand South Africa

Page 40: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Final facts and figures

Participants

• 2094 institutions

• Average voters per institution: 3.66

Results

• Academics voted for institutions in 130 countries

• Longest name: Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences Chinese Acade

• Most unusual candidate: Antarctic Research Station

• Number of votes for Trump University = 0

Page 41: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016
Page 42: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

The next World Academic Summit – Berkeley, University of California September 26-28, 2016

Page 43: Going Global 2016: Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2016

Thank you. Phil Baty

[email protected]

Duncan Ross

[email protected]

Twitter

@phil_baty

@THEWorldUniRank

@Duncan3Ross

Facebook

/THEWorldUniRank