Topic: AcknowldgmentGONZALES VS RAMOSA.C. No. 6649 /June 21, 2005YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:Fa!": Co#$%a&n! 'o( )&"*a(#en! +%e) *, -a(&na C. Gon.a%e" /01 a2a&n"! A!!,. Ca%&3!o 4. Ra#o" /C1 *eau"e o' !5e %a!!e(6" a%%e2e) #&"on)u! &n no!a(&.&n2 a 7ee) o' A*"o%u!e Sa%e &n8o%8&n2 !5e o#$%a&nan!. C6" a%%e2a!&on: !5e(e 9a" a "a%e 95e(e&n, C an) 5&" 5u"*an) a%%e2e)%, "o%) a $&ee o' %an) 9&!5 a *u&%)&n2 !5e(eon !o "$ou"e" :en(, an) -&%a Ga!u".7ue !o !5e e3eu!&on o' !5e 7ee) o' Sa%e, !5e S$" Ra#o"6 TCT 9a" ane%%e) an) a ne9 one 9a" &""ue) &n !5e na#e o' S$" Ga!u". C maintained that they (C and his husband) never appeared before the respondent to acknowledge the Deed of Sale.06" )e'en"e:A! +("!, 5e 9a" 5e"&!an! !o no!a(&.e !5e )ou#en! *eau"e 5e )&) no! "ee !5e o#$%a&nan! "&2n !5e "a#e, *u! )ue !o F(an&"o6" &n"&"!ene an) ;no9&n2 !5e# $e("ona%%,, 5e e8en!ua%%, no!a(&.e) !5e )ee).Re"$on)en! o#$a(e) !5e "&2na!u(e" o' -a(&na C. Gon.a%e" on !5e 7ee)o' A*"o%u!e Sa%e 9&!5 5e( o!5e( "&2na!u(e" &n 5&" +%e", !5e "$ou"e" Gon.a%e"*e&n2 5&" %&en!" '(o# 9a, *a;.Con8&ne) !5a! !5e "&2na!u(e on !5e 7ee)o' A*"o%u!e Sa%e 9a" &n)ee) !5e "&2na!u(e o' o#$%a&nan! -a(&na C.Gon.a%e", (e"$on)en! no!a(&.e)!5e7ee)o' A*"o%u!eSa%eon-a(52