good governance for medicinesuhc-medicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/forte_governing-the... ·...

13
Good Governance for Medicines Medicines as part of Universal Health Coverage Gilles Forte World Health Organization Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products Geneva

Upload: lamcong

Post on 21-Aug-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1 June 2013

Good Governance for Medicines

Medicines as part of Universal Health Coverage

Gilles Forte

World Health Organization Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products

Geneva

2 June 2013

Substantial budgets are invested in health and pharmaceutical sectors

US$ 6.5 trillion spent worldwide on health services each year (WHO Global Health Expenditure Atlas 2012)

Global Pharmaceutical market estimated at US$ 880 billion (IMS 2011)

In some countries, pharmaceutical spending is up to 70 % of health spending (Lu et all, WMS 2011)

This makes the Pharmaceutical sector very vulnerable to inefficiencies, unethical practices and corruption

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Considerable budgets are invested each year in health and pharmaceutical sectors to ensure good quality health services and health.

3 June 2013

Ten leading causes of inefficiency World Health Report 2010, Chapter 4

1. Medicines: underuse of generics and higher than necessary prices for medicines

6. Health-care services: inappropriate hospital admissions and length of stay

2. Medicines: use of substandard and counterfeit medicines

7. Health-care services: inappropriate hospital size (low use of infrastructure)

3. Medicines: inappropriate and ineffective use

8. Health-care services: medical errors and suboptimal quality of care

4. Health-care products and services: overuse or supply of equipment, investigations and procedures

9. Health system leakages: waste, corruption and fraud

5. Health workers: inappropriate or costly staff mix, unmotivated workers

10. Health interventions: inefficient mix/ inappropriate level of strategies

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The 2010 WHR on UHC has identified 10 leading causes of health system inefficiency, out of which 4 are related to medicines: prices, quality, use and waste. Medicines waste could be attributed to medicines supply chain inefficiencies, unethical practices and corruption. In the WHR 2010, it is estimated that «Reducing unnecessary expenditure on medicines and using them more appropriately could save countries up to 5% of their health expenditure.»

4 June 2013

Inefficiencies and unethical practices can occur throughout the medicines supply chain

Promotion

Conflict of interest

Pressure

Falsification safety/

efficacy data Bribery

Patent

R&D and clinical trials

Manufacturing

Inspection

Distribution

Registration

Selection

Procurement & import

Pricing

Prescription

Dispensing

Pharmacovigilance

Thefts Over- invoicing

Counterfeit/ substandard

Collusion Unethical donations

Unethical promotion

High prices

Inappropriate forecasting

Inappropriate use

Losses

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Throughout the various steps of the medicine supply chain, from research and production and up to prescription and dispensing, inefficiencies, unethical practices and corruption can occur and lead to weaker pharmaceutical systems and waste of financial resources that could have been reallocated to cover: more services more medicines and more people.

5 June 2013

How can good governance contribute to Universal Health Coverage

By reducing inefficiencies and unethical practices in the medicines supply chain and by the reallocation of resources for improved access to medicines and health services

By the establishment of efficient structures and processes for implementation of medicines policies and enforcement of laws and regulations

By improving transparency, accountability, ethical practices and leadership in the management of pharmaceutical systems

By preventing misuse of public, patients and donors funds and improving public trust and confidence in the health system

6 June 2013

Good governance in the pharmaceutical

sector: WHO programmes

Policy

Efficiency

Transparency

Accountability

Participation

Regulation Rule of law

Leadership

Ethics

Anti-corruption

MeTA GGM

Reliable Information

Improved access to medicines

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Currently WHO is implementing two programmes to improve good governance in the pharmaceutical sector The Good Governance for Medicines Programme (GGM) The Medicine Transparency Alliance (MeTA) in collaboration with HAI. These two programmes have in common 5 core elements for achieving good governance, meanwhile other elements are programme specific e.g. Ethics, Rule of law etc. There is no universal definition of GG and the selection of Good Governance elements is based: - on country contexts and priorities; - and on values and principles that countries are willing to promote; WHO integrates transparency and good governance into the work done on pharmaceutical policies in countries e.g. EC partnership

7 June 2013

WHO Good Governance for Medicines programme (GGM)

Goal Contribute to improve access to affordable and quality medicines and prevent waste and corruption in the medicines supply chain

Specific objectives – Raise awareness on the impact of waste and corruption in the

pharmaceutical sector – Support development of sound policies and regulations and

foster high political commitment – Increase transparency, accountability in medicines supply and

regulatory systems – Institutionalize good governance in pharmaceutical systems by

building national capacity and leadership

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Today we will focus on the Good Governance for Medicines programme, called GGM

8 5 June 2013

Good Governance for Medicines programme: the process

PHASE II

Development national GGM framework

PHASE III

Implementation national GGM programme

PHASE I

National Assessment

Clearance MOH

GGM framework officially adopted

Assessment report

GGM integrated in MoH plan

Presenter
Presentation Notes
GGM is a 3 phase model: Phase I for carrying out a National Transparency Assessment and assess vulnerability to corruption; Phase II for the development of a national GGM Framework/programme and Phase III for implementation of the GGM programme in the country.

9 5 June 2013

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Today 36 countries are implementing GGM: 13 countries/territory in Phase I 11 countries in Phase II and 12 countries in Phase III.

10 5 June 2013

National Governance Assessment Assessment of pharmaceutical sector,

transparency and vulnerability to corruption

Looks at processes of : – Supply chain: selection, procurement, distribution – Regulations: registration, licensing, inspection,

promotion, clinical trials

Elements evaluated: – Policies & practices, written procedures and

decision-making processes – Law, regulations and written procedures – National committees, criteria for membership and

conflict of interest policy – Appeals mechanisms and other monitoring

systems

PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III

Assessment report

Presenter
Presentation Notes
National transparency assessments available (33 countries) and published (17 countries)

11 5 June 2013

Development of a Good Governance Framework "Discipline-based approach"

– Aims to put into place policies, laws and best practices & procedures

– Attempts to prevent unethical and corrupt practices through fear of sanctions on reprehensible acts

"Values-based approach" – Attempts to motivate ethical conduct of public

servants – Promotion of institutional and individual integrity

through ethical principles

PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III

GGM framework officially adopted

Presenter
Presentation Notes
GGM Phase 2 is about the developpement of a national GGM framework or policy which is carried out through a national consultative process involving participation of key stakeholders. Task forces and steering committees including other stakeholders (MoH, other ministries, anti-corruption commission, NGOs, private sector) are put in place to develop national frameworks. National framework identifies interventions necessary to address gaps identified in the Assessment.

12 June 2013

Implementation of Good Governance interventions Transparency & Advocacy

Rules and regulations

Capacity building

Policies & practices

Jordan Awareness on governance issues

Code of Ethics & Conduct; Guidelines drug promotion COI Policy

Governance, Leadership

National Drug Policy; Evidence based selection Policy

LAO PDR Ethical practices & Information on drug registration disclosed

Code of Ethics adopted; Inspection services strengthened; Ban for unregistered medicines

Ethics, regulation, rules and procedures

Competitive biding for procurement; EML revised

Malaysia Awareness on governance issues

Code of Ethics; Guide for relations with Pharma; COI Policy

Training of health workers

Philippines Awards programme to develop models of governance Awareness campaign

Medicines promotion assessment

Monitoring price and availability;

Malawi Launch of GGM framework

Guide for selection of committee members; Medicines promotion

Training of health workers

PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Translation of the GGM national frameworks into action. Institutionalization and fully integrated within the MoH. 13 countries in Phase III, implementation of GGM, Examples of countries by activity 1- Mongolia and Thailand 2- Lebanon and Philipinnes 3- Malaysia, Jordan, Thailand 4- Mongolia, Malawi 5- Thailand, Philipinnes 6- Malaysia, Mongolia 7- Mongolia, Thailand

13 June 2013

Good Governance programme Evaluation Lessons learnt

Relevant information on pharmaceutical policies, regulations and procedures disclosed for policy dialogue, public awareness, and capacity building of personnel

Strong policies, legislative and regulatory frameworks in place in countries

Guidance to promote & institutionalise Good Governance elements e.g. transparency, accountability, ethical practices, leadership

Seek high political committment and develop good practices for multi stakeholders participation & dialogue

Develop methodologies for measuring governance improvements and implications for reducing inefficiencies