good publication practices

8/11/2019 Good publication practices

1/89

TOWARDS GOOD PUBLICATION PRACTICES

Halmar [email protected]

Tim Validasi, Reviewer dan PAK Pusat

Presentasi pada Workshop Penulisan Artikel Jurnal Internasional oleh

Pascasarjana Unhas, Minggu 28 September 2014, Hotel Aston, Makassar


2/89

Background: retraction watch: disciplines and

institutions, policies for punishingbad practices

Type of bad practices (BPs) and how to detect

them: Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, salami/tempe

pub., bogus Authorship, COI, rules &software

Unhas efforts against BPs: Self-Assessment

Good practices (return to the right path):

appropriate manuscript and reputable publisher

Halmar Halide @ physics unhas


3/89

Article withdrawal Policies and Formshttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawal

Article Withdrawal:Only used for Articles in Press which represent early versions of articles

and sometimes contain errors, or may have been accidentally submitted twice. Occasionally,but less frequently, the articles may represent infringements of professional ethical codes,

such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data

or the like.

Article Retraction:Infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiplesubmission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like.Occasionally a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication.

Article Removal:Legal limitations upon the publisher, copyright holder or author(s).

Article Replacement:Identification of false or inaccurate data that, if acted upon, would

pose a serious health risk.

the importance of the scholarly archive as a permanent, historic record of the

transactions of scholarship. Articles that have been published shall remain extant, exactandunalteredas far as is possible. However, very occasionally circumstances may arise where an

article is published that must later be retracted or even removed.

https://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawalhttps://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawal


4/89


5/89


6/89


7/89

http://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/21/controversial-paper-linking-conspiracy-ideation-to-

climate-change-skepticism-formally-retracted/


8/89

http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/12/paper-on-refolded-mountain-range-a-

reproduction-now-retracted/#more-18545


9/89

http://retractionwatch.com/2013/05/07/double-dipping-leads-to-removal-of-petroleum-

research-paper/#more-14032


10/89

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2013/310726/#B1


11/89

http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-subject/dentistry/


12/89


13/89


14/89

http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/24/springer-ieee-withdrawing-more-than-120-

nonsense-papers/


15/89


16/89


17/89



18/89



19/89

Unfortunately, Amgen's findings are consistent with those of others in industry. A

team at Bayer HealthCare in Germany last year reported4that only about 25% of

published preclinical studies could be validated to the point at which projects could

continue.

Fifty-three papers were deemed 'landmark' studiesNevertheless, scientific findings were confirmed in only 6 (11%) cases.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7391/full/483531a.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7391/full/483531a.html


20/89

http://www.ithenticate.com/resources/infographics/research-misconduct?...



21/89


22/89

http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/academic-integrity/students

Halmar Halide, Fisika FMIPA Unhas 2014


23/89



24/89

https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct


25/89


26/89


27/89


28/89

KELENGKAPAN DOKUMEN PENILAIAN KARYA ILMIAH

UNTUK USULAN KENAIKAN JABATAN FUNGSIONAL, KOPERTIS WIL IV, MARET 2011


29/89


30/89


31/89


32/89

http://budisansblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/ga

gasan-asuransi-bencana.html


33/89


34/89


35/89



36/89



37/89


38/89


39/89

SNIP=1,250, SJR=0,643

SNIP=1,38, SJR=0,591


40/89

SNIP=2,641, SJR=5,473

SNIP=3,,628, SJR=2,672

SNIP=2,108, SJR=3,145


41/89

Type Examples Weight(*)

Primary primary research articles in peer-reviewed journals

dissertations and theses

technical reportsconference proceedings

1

Secondary monographs (books dealing with a specific area of

research in the sciences)

literature reviews (or review articles)

2/3

Tertiary encyclopediastextbooks

handbooks

1/3

(*) untuk pembobotan kemutakhiran dan kedalaman pembahasan


42/89

KEMUTAKHIRAN= (rujukan dlm 3 atau 5 tahun terakhir/ total rujukan) x 100%

KEDALAMAN = (rujukan pada bagian hasil dan diskusi/total rujukan) x 100%


43/89

Rujukan 5 (tiga) tahun terakhir Jumlah bobot Jumlah x bobot

Primer 28 1 28Sekunder 1 2/3 0,67

Tertier 1 1/3 0,33

Total = 29

Total rujukan = 37

Mutakhir (%) (29/37) x 100 % = 78 %

Rujukan 3 (tiga) tahun terakhir Jumlah bobot Jumlah x bobot

Primer 20 1 20

Sekunder 1 2/3 0,67

Tertier 1 1/3 0,33

Total = 21

Total rujukan = 37

Mutakhir (%) (21/37) x 100 % = 57 %


44/89

Publikasi SJR SNIP Kemutakhiran(%)

Kedalaman(%)

3 Tahun 5 Tahun

PNAS 5,473 2,641 57 78 53

J. Ecology 3,145 2,108 29 52,7 49,1

Nature Climate Change 2,672 3,628 31,2 39,6 31,2

Physica A 0,634 1,25 13,3 36,7 7,7

Natural Hazards 0,591 1,38 34,2 42,1 23,7


45/89

http://publicationethics.org/cases


46/89



47/89



48/89


http://publicationethics.org/text-recycling-guidelines


49/89

Text recycling in a published article

Journal editors should consider publishing a correction article when:

Sections of the text, generally excluding methods, are identical or near identical toa previous publication by the same author(s);

The original publication is not referenced in the subsequent publication; but

There is still sufficient new material in the article to justify its publication.

The correction should amend the literature by adding the missing citation and clarifying

what is new in the subsequent publication versus the original publication.

Journal editors should consider publishing a retraction article when:

There is significant overlap in the text, generally excluding methods, with sections that are

identical or near identical to a previous publication by the same author(s);

The recycled text reports previously published data and there is insufficient new material

in the article to justify its publication in light of the previous publication(s).The recycled text forms the major part of the discussion or conclusion in the article.

The overlap breaches copyright.


50/89

http://publicationethics.org/cases


51/89

fdc11166046-photo https://www.inmagine.com/searchterms/salami.html

http://www.123rf.com/stoc

k-photo/tempe.html


http://www biochemia-medica com/2013/23/237


52/89

http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2013/23/237



53/89

Updated October 2013


54/89



55/89



56/89


57/89

http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf


58/89



59/89

http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-

of-authors-and-contributors.html



60/89

http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-

of-authors-and-contributors.html



61/89



62/89


63/89


64/89

http://www.citefactor.org/journal-impact-factor-list-2014_N.html

http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php


65/89


66/89


67/89


68/89


69/89


70/89


71/89


72/89


73/89


74/89


75/89


76/89



77/89



78/89



79/89

http://www.elsevier.com/journals/learning-and-instruction/0959-4752/guide-for-authors#25001



80/89

http://www.elsevier.com/journals/learning-and-instruction/0959-4752/guide-for-authors#25001



81/89

www.bms.bc.ca/resources/library/pdf/GuidelinesScientificPapers.pdf



82/89



83/89



84/89



85/89



86/89



87/89



88/89



89/89

good publication practices

Documents