governor brown's transportation funding plan -...
TRANSCRIPT
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
This proposal is a balance of
new revenue and reasonable
reforms to ensure efficiency
accountability and performance
from each dollar invested
to improve Californiarsquos
transportation system
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Frequently Asked Questions
This proposal is a combination of new revenue and reform with measurable targets for improvements including regular reporting streamlined projects with exemptions for infrastructure repairs and flexibility on hiring for new workload
How much does this program provide overall for transportation improvements
bull Over the next decade the Governorrsquos Transportation Funding Plan provides an estimated $36 billion in funding for transportation with an emphasis on repairing and maintaining existing transportation infrastructure and a commitment to repay an additional $879 million in outstanding loans
How much does it require the average vehicle owner in California to pay
bull The proposal equates to roughly 25-cents per motorist per day according to the Department of Finance The latest TRIP study released and subsequent article in the Washington Post showed that Californians spend on average $762 annually on vehicle repair costs due to wear and tear road conditions etc httpwwwwashingtonpostcomnewswonkblog wp20150625why-driving-on-americas-roads-can-be-more-expensive-than-you-think A figure that should go down significantly with improved road conditions
How will the program improve transportation in California over the next decade
bull Within 10 years with this plan the state has made a commitment to get our roadways up to 90 good condition Today 41 of our pavement is either distressed or needs preventative maintenance A commitment has also been made to repair an additional 200 bridges that are in distressed condition
How does the plan ensure my tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements
bull The plan includes a Constitutional Amendment to Article XIX that ensures that tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements
How does the plan hold Caltrans and local governments accountable to deliver what they promise
bull The proposed legislation requires Caltrans to annually report to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on achievement of performance targets ndash the CTC will then report annually to the Legislature and the CTC may withhold funds from Caltrans if funds are not being appropriately spent Similarly the CTC will evaluate projects submitted by cities and counties for program funding and evaluate the success of the program in reducing deferred maintenance on local roads Finally the State Controller will also audit local government expenditures and will recover andor withhold funds if not appropriately spent
The Road Information Program (TRIP) ndash a nonprofit organization that focuses on surface transportation
1
Funding
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded
from the following sources which would cost the average motorist
about 25 cents per day or $7 per month
New Revenue
bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years
bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
2
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Existing Revenue and Reform
bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program
bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years
Accelerated Loan Repayment
bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows
- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation
- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program
- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program
3
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Frequently Asked Questions
This proposal is a combination of new revenue and reform with measurable targets for improvements including regular reporting streamlined projects with exemptions for infrastructure repairs and flexibility on hiring for new workload
How much does this program provide overall for transportation improvements
bull Over the next decade the Governorrsquos Transportation Funding Plan provides an estimated $36 billion in funding for transportation with an emphasis on repairing and maintaining existing transportation infrastructure and a commitment to repay an additional $879 million in outstanding loans
How much does it require the average vehicle owner in California to pay
bull The proposal equates to roughly 25-cents per motorist per day according to the Department of Finance The latest TRIP study released and subsequent article in the Washington Post showed that Californians spend on average $762 annually on vehicle repair costs due to wear and tear road conditions etc httpwwwwashingtonpostcomnewswonkblog wp20150625why-driving-on-americas-roads-can-be-more-expensive-than-you-think A figure that should go down significantly with improved road conditions
How will the program improve transportation in California over the next decade
bull Within 10 years with this plan the state has made a commitment to get our roadways up to 90 good condition Today 41 of our pavement is either distressed or needs preventative maintenance A commitment has also been made to repair an additional 200 bridges that are in distressed condition
How does the plan ensure my tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements
bull The plan includes a Constitutional Amendment to Article XIX that ensures that tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements
How does the plan hold Caltrans and local governments accountable to deliver what they promise
bull The proposed legislation requires Caltrans to annually report to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on achievement of performance targets ndash the CTC will then report annually to the Legislature and the CTC may withhold funds from Caltrans if funds are not being appropriately spent Similarly the CTC will evaluate projects submitted by cities and counties for program funding and evaluate the success of the program in reducing deferred maintenance on local roads Finally the State Controller will also audit local government expenditures and will recover andor withhold funds if not appropriately spent
The Road Information Program (TRIP) ndash a nonprofit organization that focuses on surface transportation
1
Funding
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded
from the following sources which would cost the average motorist
about 25 cents per day or $7 per month
New Revenue
bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years
bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
2
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Existing Revenue and Reform
bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program
bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years
Accelerated Loan Repayment
bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows
- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation
- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program
- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program
3
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Funding
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded
from the following sources which would cost the average motorist
about 25 cents per day or $7 per month
New Revenue
bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years
bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
2
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Existing Revenue and Reform
bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program
bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years
Accelerated Loan Repayment
bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows
- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation
- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program
- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program
3
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded
from the following sources which would cost the average motorist
about 25 cents per day or $7 per month
New Revenue
bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years
bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion
2
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Existing Revenue and Reform
bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program
bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years
Accelerated Loan Repayment
bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows
- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation
- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program
- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program
3
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Existing Revenue and Reform
bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program
bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years
Accelerated Loan Repayment
bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows
- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation
- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program
- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program
3
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Mac
into
sh H
DU
sers
cts
teve
Doc
umen
tsJ
obs
Jobs
_A-G
gov
_tra
nsfu
nd_p
lan_
fDet
aile
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Rev
enue
10-
year
10-
14-2
015
xls
4
10-Y
ea
r Fu
nd
ing
De
tail
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Fund
ing
Prop
osal
Ye
ar
1 20
16-1
7 Ye
ar
2 20
17-1
8 Ye
ar
3 20
18-1
9 Ye
ar
4 20
19-2
0 Ye
ar
5 20
20-2
1 Ye
ar
6 20
21-2
2 Ye
ar
7 20
22-2
3 Ye
ar
8 20
23-2
4 Ye
ar
9 20
24-2
5 Ye
ar
10
2025
-26
10-y
ear
tota
l H
ighw
ay U
ser F
ee
Cha
rge
a $6
5 pe
r veh
icle
hig
hway
use
r fee
(3
09
mill
ion
vehi
cles
) 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 2
01$
201
$ 20
11
$
Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x(1
) Inc
reas
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
by 1
1 ce
nts
over
the
curr
ent
13 c
ent p
er g
allo
n ra
te
Larg
ely
affe
cts
owne
rs o
f lar
ger t
ruck
s in
clud
ing
owne
rso
pera
tors
of 4
500
00 c
omm
erci
al tr
ucks
(2
) Ind
ex th
e di
esel
exc
ise
tax
to In
flatio
n
Tota
l Die
sel E
xcis
e Ta
x
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
042
$ 0
42$
-$
002
$ 0
04$
006
$ 0
08$
009
$ 0
12$
014
$ 0
16$
018
$
418
$
087
$ 0
42$
044
$ 0
45$
047
$ 0
49$
051
$ 0
53$
055
$ 0
57$
060
$ 5
05$
Inde
x G
as E
xcis
e Ta
x
Elim
inat
e an
nual
adj
ustm
ent t
o th
e ex
cise
tax
rate
and
inde
x th
e ga
s ta
x to
infla
tion
- driv
ers
wou
ld p
ay a
n av
erag
e of
$20
mor
e pe
r yea
r ove
r 10
year
s
-$
011
$ 0
21$
032
$ 0
44$
055
$ 0
67$
079
$ 0
91$
104
$ 5
04$
Cap
and
Tra
de
Allo
cate
$50
0 m
illio
n pe
r yea
r of t
he 4
0 o
f Camp
T re
venu
e th
at is
not
co
ntin
uous
ly a
ppro
pria
ted
0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 0
50$
050
$ 5
00$
Ong
oing
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Rev
enue
2
93$
305
$ 3
18$
331
$ 3
44$
358
$ 3
71$
385
$ 4
00$
414
$ 35
20
$ C
altr
ans
Effic
ienc
ies
Hiri
ng fl
exib
ility
CE
QA
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
100
$
Pre-
Prop
ositi
on 4
2 lo
an e
arly
repa
ymen
t$8
79 m
illio
n to
tal -
$13
2 m
illio
n S
HA
$26
5 m
illio
n P
TA $
482
mill
ion
TCR
F
013
$ 0
27$
033
$ 0
15$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
088
$
Tota
l 3
16$
342
$ 3
61$
356
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
07
$
Expe
nditu
re P
lan
Loca
lTr
ansi
t Lo
cal P
artn
ersh
ipLo
cal S
treet
s an
d R
oads
(40
of r
emia
inin
g un
allo
cate
d fu
nds)
Loca
l Stre
ets
and
Roa
ds (C
ompl
ete
Stre
ets
GH
G re
duct
ion)
S
ubto
tal
Sta
te SH
OP
PM
aint
enan
ce (6
0 o
f rem
aini
ng u
nallo
cate
d fu
nds)
Trad
e C
orrid
ors
Sub
tota
l E
arly
Loa
n R
epay
men
tTr
ansi
t tra
de C
orrid
ors
Loc
al T
CR
F P
roje
cts
SH
OP
P
Cal
trans
Effi
cien
cies
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
040
$ 0
40$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
025
$ 0
25$
079
$ 0
84$
089
$ 0
94$
100
$ 1
05$
111
$ 1
16$
122
$ 1
28$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
400
$ 2
50$
102
8$
100
$ 1
54$
159
$ 1
64$
169
$ 1
75$
180
$ 1
86$
191
$ 1
97$
203
$
119
$ 1
26$
134
$ 1
42$
150
$ 1
58$
166
$ 1
74$
183
$ 1
92$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
020
$ 0
20$
177
8$
154
2$
200
$ 1
39$
146
$ 1
54$
162
$ 1
70$
178
$ 1
86$
194
$ 2
03$
212
$
022
$ 0
22$
022
$ 0
22$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
010
$ 0
10$
174
2$
088
$
100
$
Tota
l 3
25$
337
$ 3
50$
363
$ 3
54$
368
$ 3
81$
395
$ 4
10$
424
$ 37
08
$
BO
E-a
djus
ted
gas
tax
is s
et a
t 5-y
ear a
vera
ge o
f 18
cent
s (u
p 6
cent
s fro
m J
uly
1 2
015
leve
l) re
venu
e is
not
sco
red
abov
e be
caus
e of
unk
now
n cu
rren
t-law
futu
re fl
uctu
atio
n b
ut rela
tive
to th
e M
ay R
evis
ion
forc
ast
wou
ld in
crea
se re
venu
e $1
1 b
illio
n in
201
6-17
with
fluc
tuat
ing
amou
nts
ther
eafte
r dep
endi
ng o
n ga
solin
e pr
ices
Th
is re
venu
e is
dis
tribu
ted
by c
urre
nt-
law
form
ula
44
for c
ities
and
cou
ntie
s 1
2 fo
r the
SH
OP
P a
nd 4
4 fo
r the
STI
P
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Benefits
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal
The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over
$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional
$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would
allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement
reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation
system
Local Investments
bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million
bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged
like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished
revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast
5
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated
roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)
bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects
State Investments
bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal
bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B
program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B
program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)
bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed
6
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Reforms
bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend
the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027
bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public
bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines
bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand
for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority
bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner
bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes
7
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Justification
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Updated13 101215
California Transportation Overview
Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state
bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and
roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined
bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas
bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas
At Caltrans staff is down
bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly
- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding
- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years
- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition
Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts
FiscalYear1
Budgeted13 FTEs2
No ofProjectsPlanned
forDelivery
Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered
PercentDelivered
Capital Value13 of Delivered
Projects($ Billions)
No of OngoingContracts3
Value of OngoingContracts
($ Billions)3
2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944
1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015
8
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California is Under-Investing in Transportation
According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos
per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local
is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as
a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface
transportation spending falls below the national average
Other States are Investing More
In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723
California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not
In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures
bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength
bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109
bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and
elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states
bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads
California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs
bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew
bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50
local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst
httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp
9
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Support
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan
to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure
Cities and Counties
California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate
ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo
ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)
League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie
ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo
ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)
10
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)
Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo
ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)
Business and Labor Leaders
Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo
ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)
11
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez
ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)
Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino
ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo
ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)
Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn
Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo
ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)
12
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp
ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo
ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)
Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman
ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo
ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)
13
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins
ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo
ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)
California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia
This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo
ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)
14
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
Transportation Leaders
Fix Our Roads Coalition
ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo
ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)
Transportation California
ldquoA practical solutionrdquo
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)
15
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan
California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton
ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo
ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)
California Transit Association
ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo
ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger
ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)
San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino
ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo
ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)
16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO
Opinion I Editorial
Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads
SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM
A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators
debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny
Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and
vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public
transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state
infrastructure
There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59
billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill
needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the
roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more
expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to
focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work
Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP
votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls
for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while
generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion
transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of
transportation funding in years
Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by
11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers
could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the
electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500
million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees
on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and
cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly
Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a
more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions
Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway
user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings
through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But
the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan
support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans
cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding
bull 17
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Continued next page
18
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull
It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do
The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not
going to be easy to get
The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get
Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is
less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best
interest - and then convince the voters
It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments
Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are
in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it
could actually save California drivers money
Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods
depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape
Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will
The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it
beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long
Editorials
19
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates
issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors
office today
We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a
solid foundation for a potential compromise package
Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing
funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation
revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans
reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)
The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only
become exponentially more costly in a few years
It is t ime to get this done
To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a
list of coalition members
bull 20
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
BAVAQEA - COUNCIL
IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337
rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg
BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package
uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year
According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses
About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide
21
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e
Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280
mwattsswmconsultcom
Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework
Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework
ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session
We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs
This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage
We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo
22
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors
Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework
The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris
McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework
For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the
transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a
proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best
ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a
number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and
roads system and public transit
The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package
based on this framework before adjourning next week
The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of
our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont
commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our
bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of
$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions
Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of
the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need
bull 23
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy
It is well past time for the Legislature to act
Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions
according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100
Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials
bull 24
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS
Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith
James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay
The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways
He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline
Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country
Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne
bull 25
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES
PRESS RELEASE
CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015
Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator
916-327-7500 ext S16
916-342-9508 mobile
SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation
improvements in California put forward by the Governor today
This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year
to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate
It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise
CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay
will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line
The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level
bull 26
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS
1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~
MEDIA
rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent
WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent
El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer
TM t~EMINS Qirectot
FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s
OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19
SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot
Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und
We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to
cities and co1mtie$
1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating
valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state
Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger
Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager
-End-
Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT
Business Manager
bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager
27
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori
September920IS
ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4
RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt
Plar Oovemor BroWQ
The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce
The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years
~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state
Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework
Sincerely
David Bejarano President
Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager
Cc All Members California State Legislature
bull 28
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS
ManO~ce
8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet
12ti flo~r
Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii
90017middot3435
H2q) 2~61809
f(213) 236-1825
Offi~ers
P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro
f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana
$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte
Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura
ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir
ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro
Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs
=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit
BiUJatm Big llfar
fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto
T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts
Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814
RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System
Dear Governor Brown
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes
SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure
Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being
Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California
Sincerely
Hasan lkhrata Executive Director
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per
29
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA
~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office
8l8 West Seventh Street
_2th Fo~r
Los ingeies Calif(irriii
90017-343S
t(m) 23(i 1 eo9
f(2l3)236-825
wviwscagqgov
Orfic~r~
Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ
~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana
$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce
l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura
ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot
cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt
PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and
Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear
Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto
fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts
Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p
The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California
201557 printed on recycled paper
bull 30
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT
PRESIDENT
Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT
Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT
VICE PRESIDENT
Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT
2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT
)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT
Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR
ClERIC QF THE 80~10
Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter
3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos
Septernber 10 2015
The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814
Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT
Dear Governor Brown
On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies
The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot
Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot
TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me
Re~uuubmitted
~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director
bull 31
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Steve Tye Mayor
Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber
Jimmy Lin Council Member
Jack Tanaka Council Member
City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178
September 17 2015
The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160
(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117
wwwDiamondBarCAgov
RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session
D~ar Gov~rnor Brown
On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately
Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs
Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k
Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists
Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J
CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son
bull 32
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press
Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan
September 3 2015
SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released
today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns
proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have
become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon
Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in
Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more
urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the
$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding
Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853
On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation
bull 33
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Local Allocations
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476
315354 3153543 1496395 14963955
ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586
5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502
2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903
1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783
13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12
34
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511
CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755
PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077
16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462
2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653
4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928
DEL NORTE COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12
35
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360
2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390
15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868
3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097
2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034
2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12
36
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015
37
Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262
17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667
10397149 128745
19089543 276546 3460112 991692
13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708
Page 4 of 12
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12
38
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930
CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537
3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591
1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074
FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989
6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432
2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383
1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846
6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477
MADERA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12
39
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054
2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934
32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758
6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12
40
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884
PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569
BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438
19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956
1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050
PLUMAS COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12
41
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703
ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510
37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859
7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393
10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
YTRAC 1363452 13634519
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12
42
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639
9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832
6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528
20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12
43
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -
estmated 2 Sept 2015
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219
CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766
4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353
854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196
3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427
5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514
8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192
8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12
44
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45
Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles
$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -
Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927
3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137
1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920
TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359
2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724
10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504
3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588
2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746
Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000
CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12
45