graduate portfolio

77
Katherine B. Simson WORK

Upload: katherine-simson

Post on 22-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

University of Illinois at Chicago Graduate Work 2011-2012

TRANSCRIPT

  • Katherine B. Simson

    WORK

  • Katherine B. [email protected]

    M.Arch CandidateUniversity of Illinois Chicago

    B.A. ArchUniversity of Kentucky[May 2011]

  • CONTENTS

    ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

    Urban Landforms

    Problems with the Extrusion

    Rossiville

    04

    34

    50

  • 4FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    5Architectural Design III

    Urban LandformsAlexander Eisenschmidt, Stewart HIcks, and Marina Nicollier Studio

  • 6FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 7Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Urban LandformsAlexander Eisenschmidt, Stewart HIcks, and Marina Nicollier Studio

  • 8FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

    Urban LandformsAlexander Eisenschmidt, Stewart HIcks, and Marina Nicollier Studio

    Urban Landforms seeks to develop an architecture that is deeply invested in the city. It rethinks urbanism on the basis of atmosphere not limited to the exterior, it seeks new relationships between program, form

    and urban location, and it productively rethinks monu-mentality. Urban Landforms understands the city as a site of architectural inven-tion and a place fi lled with spatial, organizational, and programmatic opportuni-

    ties. This project attempts to capitalize on the dynam-ics of the city and incorpo-rate the citys intelligences. Urban Landforms uses the program of the convention center to explore the ex-changes and transactions

    between architecture and and the city, and to invent new connections. The site, located in Chicago, the prototypical American city, has produced many urban interiors and small urban-isms. Urban Landforms,

    the downtown convention center, will become part of Chicagos system of large architectures.

  • The original site is split in half by Lake Shore Drive.

    The area of the site is lifted up, over Lake Shore Drive, in order to maximize the horizontal area. This plane acts as a horizontal datum within the structure that houses the convention program.

    The structure is pushed down to allow for access into the building, as well as creates subterranean programmable space.

    The structure is pulled up to allow for views of the city and the lake, as well as to create an occupiable terrain for public use. This creates a constructed mountain within the flat terrain of the urban fabric.

    The form of the building is then offset to the interior to create a large volume for the convention program to occupy.

    9Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 10

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Horizontal Plane Addition of Program Resulting Form Land Type Programmatic Shape

    Layered Plain

    Rolling Hills

    Mountain Range

    Mt. Everest

    Valleys

    Urban Landforms

    Formal Catalog

  • 11Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    The initial design proposal represents the downtown convention center as an urban landform. A new topography is introduced to Chicago: the mountain. This allows for the roof plane to be occupiable by the public, thus offering a new type of recreation to the city. The monument, or urban icon, becomes a synthetic geograhic feature in the urban fabric.

  • 12

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Programmatic Categories Specific Categories Seasonal Program Distribution Program Distribution

    Con

    vent

    ion

    Prog

    ram

    Hot

    el P

    rogr

    amO

    ffice

    Pro

    gram

    Reta

    il Pr

    ogra

    mC

    ircul

    atio

    n

    Mou

    ntai

    n Pr

    ogra

    mTr

    ansi

    tiona

    l Dat

    um P

    rogr

    amG

    laci

    er P

    rogr

    amC

    ircul

    atio

    n

    ConventionPrograms

    HotelPrograms

    Office Programs

    Retail Programs

    SupportPrograms

    Urban Landforms

    Program Matrix

  • 13Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Programmatic Categories Specific Categories Seasonal Program Distribution Program Distribution

    Con

    vent

    ion

    Prog

    ram

    Hot

    el P

    rogr

    amO

    ffice

    Pro

    gram

    Reta

    il Pr

    ogra

    mC

    ircul

    atio

    n

    Mou

    ntai

    n Pr

    ogra

    mTr

    ansi

    tiona

    l Dat

    um P

    rogr

    amG

    laci

    er P

    rogr

    amC

    ircul

    atio

    n

    ConventionPrograms

    HotelPrograms

    Office Programs

    Retail Programs

    SupportPrograms

    (above, left) The roof plane is visualized as a natural terrain, covered with Illinois native prairie vegetation.(above, right) The ground plane is enclosed by the structure above, thus becoming a winter garden for the public to utilize.

  • Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Short Section_01

    Short Section_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Plan_01 Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Short Section_04

    Short Section_06

    Short Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Plan_01 Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Long Section_01

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    14

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Short Section_01

    Short Section_03

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Plan_01 Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Short Section_04

    Short Section_06

    Short Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Short Section_07 Short Section_08

    Plan_01 Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Short Section_05 Short Section_06

    Plan_02

    Plan_01

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    Short Section_01 Short Section_02

    Short Section_03 Short Section_04

    Long Section_01

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Plan_08

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Long Section_01

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Plan_07

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Long Section_02

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Plan_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Long Section_03

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Plan_05

    Plan_04

    Plan_03

    Plan_02

    Long Section_04

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_05

    Long Section_06

    Long Section_07

    Long Section_08

    15Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 16

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

    Interior Scenarios: the Winter Garden

  • 17Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 18

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 19Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 20

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

    Ground Floor Plan

  • 21Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Typical Floor Plan through Mountain

  • 22

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

    Interior Scenarios: Exhibition Stair

  • 23Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 24

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 25Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 26

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 27Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    The section through the mountain protrusion, conven-tion space, and glacier depicts the large void space that lies within. The void houses the convention program, but also serves the other programmat-ic categories. In the mountain, the void serves as an atrium that provides light and views for the hotel and offi ce space above. In the glacier, the void serves as an auditorium space, which can be accessed by the convention users. Due to the largely opaque char-acter of the roof and ground plane, lighting of the interior is a crucial issue to address. The void allows for natural light to be diffused thoughout the interior from the vertical surfaces; the space within is open, rather than cavernous.

  • 28

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

    Interior Scenarios: Convention

  • 29Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 30

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 31Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 32

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Urban Landforms

  • 33Architectural Design III

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 34

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

  • 35Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Problems with the ExtrusionAndrew Zago Studio

  • 36

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

    The Futura font was used to drive this project, which is based on the process of the extrusion. Forms were generated from the extrusion of letters. Initially the letters were confined to extrusion in the XYZ planes,

    which restricted the resul-tant forms to orthagonal characteristics. Gradually, the letters were extruded in more obscure angles, thus blurring the letterforms and creating more abstract forms. The techniques

    of cropping and filleting were employed to further progress the forms and erode the intial typography that was used. New formal possibilities result from the process of extrusion, cropping, and filleting; the

    process determines the formal result. Contextual pressures and subjective desires have less influence on the form, thus pushing it past the point of normalcy.

  • 37Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Orthogonal Extrusions

  • 38

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

    Non-Orthogonal Extrusions

  • 39Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 40

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

  • 41Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Ross

    ivill

    e

    Formal Process

  • 42

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

  • 43Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 44

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

  • 45Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 46

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

    01 02 03

  • 47Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    04 05 06

  • 48

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Problems with the Extrusion

  • 49Architectural Design II

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 50

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • 51Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    RossivilleKelly Bair and Paul Preissner Studio

  • 52

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

    Drawing Problem No.1The copy. A reproduction of Aldo Rossis set of 12 drawings from the Summer of 1980. Adherence to Rossis precise use (or misuse) of perspective, repetitive elements, and shad-ing types. Through the act of copying the work of Rossi, a true understanding of his drawing technique is achieved.

  • 53Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • A A A A A A A A A A A A A

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    Il monumento disegrate, 1965.KS.

    etate 80/2

    Le cabine dellElba, 1975.KS.

    etate 80/5

    Il cubo di cuneo, 1962.KS.

    etate 80/3

    Pile foundationfor lightnesswith theatre, 1980.

    KS.

    etate 80/4

    I

    HG

    F

    E

    C

    A

    Le case sul Ticino, 1975. KS. etate 80/7

    54

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • etate 80/5La casa dello studente di Chieti, 1976.KS.etate 80/6

    Le case di Bergamo, 1979.KS.

    etate 80/9

    La scuola di Broni, 1978.KS.

    etate 80/10

    Il portico di Modena, 1977.KS.

    etate 80/8

    Teatro Veneziano, 1979. KS.

    etate 80/11

    Porta a Venezia, 1980.KS.

    etate 80/1255Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 56

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

    Drawing Problem No.2The simulacra. Aldo Rossis precise use of perspective, repetition, and irregularity allows one to infer what exists on the opposite side of each drawing from the Summer of 1980. A worms eye perspec-tive view reveals the reverse side of each image.

  • 57Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • A A A A A A A A A A A A A

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    Il monumento disegrate, 1965.KS.

    etate 80/2

    Il monumento disegrate, 1965.KS.

    etate 80/2

    Le cabine dellElba, 1975.KS.

    etate 80/5

    Le cabine dellElba, 1975.KS.

    etate 80/5

    Il cubo di cuneo, 1962.KS.

    etate 80/3

    Il cubo di cuneo, 1962.KS.

    etate 80/3

    Pile foundationfor lightnesswith theatre, 1980.

    KS.

    etate 80/4

    I

    H

    G

    F

    E

    C

    A

    Pile foundationfor lightnesswith theatre, 1980.

    KS.

    etate 80/4Le case sul Ticino, 1975. KS. etate 80/7

    Le case sul Ticino, 1975. KS. etate 80/7

    58

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • La casa dello studente di Chieti, 1976.KS.etate 80/6

    La casa dello studente di Chieti, 1976.KS.etate 80/6

    Le case di Bergamo, 1979.KS.

    etate 80/9La scuola di Broni, 1978.KS. etate 80/10

    La scuola di Broni, 1978.KS.

    etate 80/10

    Il portico di Modena, 1977.KS.

    etate 80/8

    Teatro Veneziano, 1979. KS.

    etate 80/11

    Teatro Veneziano, 1979. KS.

    etate 80/11

    Porta a Venezia, 1980.KS.

    etate 80/12

    Porta a Venezia, 1980.KS.

    etate 80/12

    59Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 60

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

    Drawing Problem No.3The interpretation. Although Aldo Rossis work was pre digital and seemingly lacks the complexity of curved surfaces, he had a strong interest in that process of design. Drawing no. 01/12 is used as a shell in which the interior is manipulated us-ing digital techniques. The re-sult is a rectilinear exterior with a curvilinear interior; both com-municate Rossis emphasis on repetition and irregularity.

  • 61Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • A A A A A A A A A A A A A

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    A A A A A A A A A A A A A

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    SCALE 02_MEDIUM

    SCALE 03_LARGE

    SCALE 01_SMALL 01_SINGLE INTERSECTION

    02_MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS

    03_MERGED INTERSECTION

    01_SINGLE INTERSECTION01_SINGLE INTERSECTION

    02_MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS02_MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS02_MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS

    03_MERGED INTERSECTION03_MERGED INTERSECTION03_MERGED INTERSECTION03_MERGED INTERSECTION03_MERGED INTERSECTION03_MERGED INTERSECTION

    LAYER 01_PLAN

    LAYER 02_PLAN

    LAYER 03_PLAN

    LAYER 04_PLAN

    LAYER 05_PLAN

    LAYER 06_PLAN

    LAYER 07_PLAN

    SECTION 01

    SECTION 02

    SECTION 03

    SECTION 04

    01020304

    _01

    _02

    _03

    _04

    _01

    _02

    _03

    _04

    PROCESS DIAGRAM_AXON PROCESS DIAGRAM_SECTION

    Casa dabitazione a Milano/Gallaratese, 1970.KS.

    etate 80/1

    SCALE 02_MEDIUM

    SCALE 03_LARGE

    SCALE 01_SMALL

    SCALE 02_MEDIUM

    SCALE 03_LARGE

    SCALE 01_SMALL

    62

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • EXPLODED LAYERS

    LAYER 01_PLAN

    LAYER 02_PLAN

    LAYER 03_PLAN

    LAYER 04_PLAN

    LAYER 05_PLAN

    LAYER 06_PLAN

    LAYER 07_PLAN

    SECTION 01

    SECTION 02

    SECTION 03

    SECTION 04

    SECTION 05

    SECTION 06

    SECTION 07

    SECTION 08

    05060708

    63Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 64

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

    Drawing Problem No.4The proposal. In a town com-posed of Aldo Rossis arche-typical forms, an elementary school must be designed. Based upon Rossis design processes and the surface constructions from drawing problem no. 03, the school ad-dresses interior and exterior conditions at multiple scales. Program is inserted in and around perforations that form when two surfaces intersect.

  • 65Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 66

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • CONCEPT DIAGRAM

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    67Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Formal Strategy

  • 68

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • GROUND/MASSING

    Down

    Up

    69Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    Formal Process

  • 1 Gym/Multi-Purpose2 Core Circulation Stair3 Outdoor Recreation Space4 Main Entrance Stair5 Main Offices6 Gallery7 Perforation Above Playground8 Large Classrooms9 Small Classrooms10 Bathroom11 Rooftop Outdoor Recreation Space

    1

    22 2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    8

    88

    8

    89

    9

    9

    9 99

    10

    10

    11 11

    70

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • 1 Gym/Multi-Purpose2 Core Circulation Stair3 Outdoor Recreation Space4 Main Entrance Stair5 Main Offices6 Gallery7 Perforation Above Playground8 Large Classrooms9 Small Classrooms10 Bathroom11 Rooftop Outdoor Recreation Space

    1

    22 2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    8

    88

    8

    89

    9

    9

    9 99

    10

    10

    11 11

    71Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

  • 72

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • 73Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille

    S1

    S2

  • 74

    FALL2011

    SPR.2012

    FALL2012

    Rossiville

  • 75Architectural Design I

    Urb

    an L

    andf

    orm

    sPr

    oble

    ms

    with

    the

    Extr

    usio

    nRo

    ssiv

    ille