graduates exit survey - the american university in cairo€¦ · graduates exit survey fall 2016...
TRANSCRIPT
GRADUATES EXIT SURVEY Fall 2016
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO DATA ANALYTICS AND INSTITUITIONAL RESEARCH
http://www.aucegypt.edu/about/data-analytics-and-institutional-research
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Graduate Student Exit Survey is to assess opinions of graduate students about their experience at AUC. The Graduate Student Exit Survey was developed by the Office of Data Analytics and Institutional Research (DAIR) and the Office of Graduate Studies. DAIR emailed the survey invitations to 203 graduate students on February 2, 2017. The survey remained accessible until March 3rd, 2017, and four email reminders were sent throughout this period. Upon closing the survey, 110 students had completed it, for a response rate of about 54%.
METHODOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT This report consists of six parts:
Part I: General demographic information presented as frequencies and charts Part II: Questions regarding graduate students’ academic experience, in addition to the overall
students’ rating to some academic aspects presented as frequencies and charts Part III: Questions regarding graduate students’ rating of their experiences and provided support
services presented as frequencies and charts Part IV: Overall student satisfaction Part V: Strengths, weaknesses and satisfaction arranged into functional themes and listed by
respondents’ major Part VI: Trends for selected questions
PART I: GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
ACADEMIC-RELATED INFORMATION
Q1: PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE % (FROM ALL RESPONDENTS 110)
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION) MISSING
AUC Staff Yes 12 10.91% 11.11% 68
No 56 50.91% 51.85%
AUC Faculty Yes 6 5.45% 5.56% 61
No 55 50.00% 50.93%
Bachelor’s degree from AUC Yes 20 18.18% 18.52% 67
No 47 42.73% 43.52%
Bachelor's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC
Yes 60 54.55% 55.56% 80 No 20 18.18% 18.52%
Bachelor's degree from a university outside Egypt
Yes 9 8.18% 8.33% 62
No 53 48.18% 49.07%
Master's degree (MA/MSC) from AUC
Yes 102 92.73% 94.44% 105
No 3 2.73% 2.78%
Master's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC
Yes 7 6.36% 6.48% 60 No 53 48.18% 49.07%
Master's degree from a university outside Egypt
Yes 4 3.64% 3.70% 60
No 56 50.91% 51.85%
Ph.D. from a university in Egypt Yes 3 2.73% 2.78% 57
No 54 49.09% 50.00%
Ph.D. from a university outside Egypt
Yes 0 0.00% 0.00% 57
No 57 51.82% 52.78%
IF YOU ARE NOT AN AUC ALUMNI, PLEASE SPECIFY THE NAME AND THE LOCATION OF YOUR UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION
UNIVERSITY COUNT
AASTMT 1
Ahram Canadian University, 6 of October, Egypt 1
Ain shams university , faculty of Al Alsun 1
Ain Shams University, Cairo 4
Al-Azhar University 1
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt 2
Cairo University 6
Cairo University - Egypt 1
Cairo University in Giza, Egypt 1
Cairo University, Faculty of Economic and Political Science 1
Duke University 1
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of Commerce and Business Admin., Helwan University 1
Faculty of Commerce English Section, Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of Commerce, Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of Commerce, English section, Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza 1
Faculty of engineering- Cairo University 1
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of medicine, zagazig University 1
Faculty of Pharmacy Ain Shams University 1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 1
faculty of pharmacy-Ain Shams university 1
Faculty of science Cairo university 1
Future University in Egypt 1
Georgetown University 1
King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia 1
Minufiya University 1
Misr International University (MIU), Cairo 1
October 6 University / Egypt 1
Sadat Academy for Management Sciences 1
Tanta University 1
The British University in Egypt 2
The German University in Cairo 3
The Hashemite University, Jordan 1
University of California-Berkeley, USA 1
Veterinary medicine cairo University 1
0.0%
2.8%
3.7%
5.6%
6.5%
8.3%
11.1%
18.5%
55.6%
94.4%
Ph.D. from a university outside Egypt
Ph.D. from a university in Egypt
Master's degree from a university outside Egypt
AUC Faculty
Master's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC
Bachelor's degree from a university outside Egypt
AUC Staff
Bachelor’s degree from AUC
Bachelor's degree from a university in Egypt other than AUC
Master's degree (MA/MSC) from AUC
Students' Identification
Q2: FULLTIME/ PART TIME STUDENT STATUS: PLEASE CHECK WHAT IS APPLICABLE FOR YOU
ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE %
(FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION – 108)
Full-time Student 62 57.4%
Part-time Student 46 42.6%
Total 108
Missing 2
57.4
42.6
Percentage of Full-time/ Part-time Students
Full-time student - 3 courses per semester Part-time student - less than 3 courses
Q3: STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
PRIMARY ACADEMIC PROGRAM COUNT
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION - 105)
Arabic Language Institute 2 1.9%
Arabic Studies 1 1.0%
Biotechnology 8 7.6%
Center for Arabic Study Abroad 0 0.0%
Chemistry 1 1.0%
Community Psychology 0 0.0%
Computer Science 4 3.8%
Computing 0 0.0%
Construction Engineering 6 5.7%
Counseling Psychology 0 0.0%
Economics 2 1.9%
Economics in International Development
0 0.0%
Egyptology & Coptology 0 0.0%
Electronics Engineering 1 1.0%
English & Comparative Literature 2 1.9%
Environmental Engineering 2 1.9%
Environmental System Design 0 0.0%
Family and Child Counseling 0 0.0%
Finance 1 1.0%
Gender and Women's Studies in ME 1 1.0%
History 0 0.0%
International & Comparative Education
6 5.7%
International & Comparative Law 2 1.9%
International Human Rights Law 0 0.0%
Journalism & Mass Communication 7 6.7%
MA in Public Administration 5 4.8%
MA of Laws 4 3.8%
Master in Public Policy 6 5.7%
Master of Business Administration 11 10.5%
Master of Global Affairs 3 2.9%
Master of Public Policy & Administration
7 6.7%
Mechanical Engineering 4 3.8%
Middle East Studies 1 1.0%
Migration and Refugee Studies 0 0.0%
Nanotechnology 1 1.0%
PhD in Applied Science 0 0.0%
PhD in Engineering 0 0.0%
Physics 1 1.0%
Political Science 6 5.7%
Product Development and Systems Management
0 0.0%
Robotics, Control & Smart Systems 2 1.9%
Sociology Anthropology 4 3.8%
Teaching Arabic As a Foreign Language
2 1.9%
Teaching English As a Foreign Language
2 1.9%
TV. & Digital Journalism 0 0.0%
Total 105
Missing 5
1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%
2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%
3%4%4%4%4%
5%6%6%6%6%
7%7%
8%11%
Arabic Studies
Chemistry
Electronics Engineering
Finance
Gender and Women's Studies in ME
Middle East Studies
Nanotechnology
Physics
Arabic Language Institute
Economics
English & Comparative Literature
Environmental Engineering
International & Comparative Law
Robotics, Control & Smart Systems
Teaching Arabic As a Foreign Language
Teaching English As a Foreign Language
Master of Global Affairs
Computer Science
MA of Laws
Mechanical Engineering
Sociology Anthropology
MA in Public Administration
Construction Engineering
International & Comparative Education
Master in Public Policy
Political Science
Journalism & Mass Communication
Master of Public Policy & Administration
Biotechnology
Master of Business Administration
Students' Primary Academic Programs
Q4: DUAL DEGREES
• 6 students reported that they are enrolled in a secondary program, 2 of which reported their secondary program the same as the
primary program.
• Reported dual degrees for the 6 students were as follows:
Legend
Q5: YEAR OR SEMESTER STUDENT ENROLLED AS A GRADUATE
ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE %
Fall 2008 5 4.90%
Spring 2009 2 1.96%
Fall 2009 2 1.96%
Spring 2010 7 6.86%
Fall 2010 2 1.96%
Spring 2011 2 1.96%
Fall 2011 5 4.90%
Spring 2012 9 8.82%
Summer 2012 0 0.00%
Fall 2012 7 6.86%
Spring 2013 4 3.92%
Fall 2013 16 15.69%
Spring 2014 10 9.80%
Construction Engineering
Construction Engineering Economics
Economics in International Development
BiotechnologyJournalism & Mass Comm
Master in Public Policy
Master in Public Policy Sociology
AnthropologyMaster in
Public Policy
Journalism & Mass Comm
Middle East Studies
ANSWER OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE %
Fall 2014 31 30.39%
Total 102
Missing 8
4.90%1.96% 1.96%
6.86%
1.96% 1.96%4.90%
8.82%
0.00%
6.86%3.92%
15.69%
9.80%
30.39%
Fall 2008 Spring 2009 Fall 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer2012
Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014
First Year Enrollment
Q6: STUDENTS’ NATIONALITY
ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL REPSPONSES
107)
Iraq 1 0.93%
Jordan 1 0.93%
Kenya 1 0.93%
Kuwait 1 0.93%
Nigeria 1 0.93%
Saudi Arabia 1 0.93%
Spain 1 0.93%
United States of America 3 2.80%
Egypt 97 90.65%
Total 107
Missing 3
Q6: STUDENTS’ COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES
102)
Colombia 1 0.98%
Iraq 1 0.98%
Jordan 1 0.98%
Kuwait 1 0.98%
Nigeria 1 0.98%
Pakistan 1 0.98%
United States of America 2 1.96%
Saudi Arabia 3 2.94%
Egypt 91 89.22%
Total 102
Missing 8
0.93%
0.93%
0.93%
0.93%
0.93%
0.93%
0.93%
2.80%
90.65%
Iraq
Jordan
Kenya
Kuwait
Nigeria
Saudi Arabia
Spain
United States of America
Egypt
Students' Nationality
0.98%
0.98%
0.98%
0.98%
0.98%
0.98%
1.96%
2.94%
89.22%
Colombia
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Nigeria
Pakistan
United States of America
Saudi Arabia
Egypt
Students' Country of Origin
Q7: STUDENTS’ GENDER
ANSWER OPTIONS COUNT
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONDENTS
TO THIS QUESTION – 114)
Male 42 38.9%
Female 66 61.1%
Total 108
Missing 2
Q8: STUDENTS’ AGE RANGE
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN COUNT
PERCENTAGE % (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS
QUESTION 109)
Under 25 7 6.42%
25-29 41 37.61%
30-34 36 33.03%
35-45 20 18.35%
Over 45 5 4.59%
Total 109
Missing 1
38.9%
61.1%
Male Female
4.59%
6.42%
18.35%
33.03%
37.61%
Over 45
Under 25
35-45
30-34
25-29
Students' Age Range
FUTURE ACADEMIC CAREER PLANS
Q9: FOR MA/MS STUDENTS: DO YOU INTEND TO PURSUE A PH.D. PROGRAM?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS
QUESTION 104)
Yes 56 53.8%
Don't know 41 39.4%
No 7 6.7%
Total 104
Missing 6
IF YOUR ANSWER IS "YES", WHICH INSTITUTION(S) AND PHD PROGRAM(S) YOU WISH TO JOIN?
The American University in Cairo (1)
• I want to join school of science and engineering at AUC to pursue PhD degree in applied sciences
Travel Abroad (23)
• Westminister university in the UK
• I joined the PhD program at University of Houston, TX, USA
• international and comapritive development
• Harvard University
• Coloumbia University, Berkely, John Hopkins
• Targeting institutions in Canada, USA, Germany and Australia, Programs of Computer Science in computer vision and machine learning
• University of montreal
• QUT Ph.D in creative industry
• Smart Grids
• London School of Economics, PhD in Economics
• ETH Zurich, PhD in Mechanical Engineering
• Lse, ucl or kings in london for a phd i international law
• Applied Linguistics, Birmingham
• Economics in Lund University
• European universities will be my main focus
• School of Economics and Law in UK or The European Institute in Italy
• I am planning to go abroad, most probably a program related to urban development and,or geography.
• Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health - PhD Concentration in Health & Public Policy, University of Illinois Department of Communication - PhDPhd. Program in Electronics and communication or Biomedical engineering
• Law in uk
• Lancaster University
• MD_PhD program at Harvard or MIT
6.7%
39.4%
53.8%
Not Intending
Don't know
Intending
MA/MS Students' Intention to Pursue a PH.D.
• Duke University, University of Michigan, Brown University, UC Berkeley, Anthropology
• In Germany, any phD program that is related to political mass media
Undecided (15)
• no phd programs suitable in Egypt. Looking for part time phd program abroad. Leicester University in UK is on top of my list for a phd in media policy.
• Still searching
• Haven't decided yet.
• Still looking for opportunities. Most probably Miami University.
• Still searching
• Not sure yet
• NA
• not yet decided
• Harvard Law School
• Not decided yet.
• UK
• I have not decided yet.
• Still dont know
• Construction Engineering program. Institution still under consideration.
• Undecided
Other (11)
• DBA
• PHD in linguistics from faculty of Al-alsun, Ain Shams University
• Education
• a program on urban studies
• Cairo University or Sadat Academy
• Ain Shams University
• Cairo University
• chemistry
• PhD in Environmental Engineering
• Mechanical engineering
• Anthropology
1
11
15
23
AUC
Other
Undecided
Study Abroad
Students' PhD plans
Q10: FOR PH.D STUDENTS: ARE YOU ENROLLED IN AUC'S PH.D PROGRAM?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS
QUESTION 14)
Yes 3 21.43%
No 11 78.57%
Total 14
Missing 96
Only three students reported the time taken to complete their Ph.D programs; one reported 5-years, one reported 6-years & one reported 7-years completion tim.
AUC TUITION COVERAGE
Q11: HOW DID YOU COVER THE COST OF YOUR TUITION AT AUC?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO
THIS QUESTION 103)
Personal fund 60.2% 62
AUC Financial aid (work study/assistantships or tuition discount)
22.3% 23
AUC Fellowship 51.5% 53
AUC Staff/Faculty Scholarship
14.6% 15
Outside donor (Ford Foundation, Fulbright, your employer, etc.)
12.6% 13
Commercial bank loans 0.0% 0
Federal Student AID (FAFSA) 1.9% 2
Total 103
Missing 7
21.43%
78.57%
Yes
No
Ph.D Students Enrolled at AUC
1.90%
12.60%
14.60%
22.30%
51.50%
60.20%
Federal Student AID (FAFSA)
Outside donor (Ford Foundation,…
AUC Staff/Faculty Scholarship
AUC Financial aid (work…
AUC Fellowship
Personal fund
AUC Tuition Coverage
Other (Please specify)
Only reported other sources of funding (5) • Yousef Jameel fellowship
• Mo Ibrahim foundation
• Youssef Jameel public leadership fellowship
• Youssef Jameel Followship for 4 years, then personal fund for 2 years.
• parents fund
EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION
Q13: STUDENTS’ EMPLOYMENT STATUS
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
Employed full time 74 68.5%
Employed part time 13 12.0%
Seeking employment 17 15.7%
Unemployed 4 3.7%
Total 108
Missing 2
Q14: HAS YOUR AUC GRADUATE DEGREE HAD A POSITIVE IMPACT ON YOUR SALARY?
ANSWER CHOICES
RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
(FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 109)
Yes 30 27.5%
No 43 39.4%
Not Applicable 36 33.0%
Total 109
Missing 1
68.5%
12.0%
15.7%
3.7%
Students' Employment Status
Employed full time
Employed part time
Seeking employment
Unemployed
27.5%
39.4%
33.0%
Has your AUC graduate degree had a positive impact on your salary?
Yes No Not Applicable
Q15: HOW MUCH WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE WHEN YOU STARTED YOUR GRADUATE PROGRAM?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
(FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 109)
Less than 3 years 36 33.03%
3-5 years 31 28.44%
6-10 years 29 26.61%
11-15 years 7 6.42%
More than 15 years 6 5.50%
Total 109
Missing 1
33.03%
28.44%26.61%
6.42% 5.50%
Less than 3 years 3-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years More than 15 years
Work Experience at the Time of Starting the Program
PART II: ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCE WITH WRITING A THESIS
Q16: IS WRITING A THESIS PART OF YOUR DEGREE?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
Yes 83 86.5%
No 13 13.5%
Total 96
Missing 14
Q17: IF YOUR ANSWER IN THE PREVIOUS QUESTION IS "YES', PLEASE INDICATE YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FOLLOWING:
VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED VERY DISSATISFIED N/A TOTAL
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
a. Availability to identify a suitable thesis supervisor
Count 34 34 7 7 3 1 86 1.05
% Percentage of Total 39.53% 39.53% 8.14% 8.14% 3.49% 1.16%
b. Availability of a thesis supervisor
Count 42 30 8 4 1 1 86 1.27
% Percentage of Total 48.84% 34.88% 9.30% 4.65% 1.16% 1.16%
c. Availability of readers Count 30 28 14 7 1 4 84 0.99
% Percentage of Total 35.71% 33.33% 16.67% 8.33% 1.19% 4.76%
d. Quality of thesis supervision Count 34 36 9 3 3 1 86 1.12
% Percentage of Total 39.53% 41.86% 10.47% 3.49% 3.49% 1.16%
e. Supervisor feedback provided in a timely manner
Count 36 32 12 4 1 1 86 1.15
% Percentage of Total 41.86% 37.21% 13.95% 4.65% 1.16% 1.16%
f. Resources availability Count 38 33 9 3 1 2 86 1.24
% Percentage of Total 44.19% 38.37% 10.47% 3.49% 1.16% 2.33%
g. Support in data collection Count 26 26 19 3 1 11 86 0.97
% Percentage of Total 30.23% 30.23% 22.09% 3.49% 1.16% 12.79%
h. Information about copyright Count 30 31 17 2 1 5 86 1.07
% Percentage of Total 34.88% 36.05% 19.77% 2.33% 1.16% 5.81%
i. Information about Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Count 34 29 13 0 1 8 85 1.23
% Percentage of Total 39.53% 33.72% 15.12% 0.00% 1.16% 9.30%
39.53%
34.88%
30.23%
44.19%
41.86%
39.53%
35.71%
48.84%
39.53%
33.72%
36.05%
30.23%
38.37%
37.21%
41.86%
33.33%
34.88%
39.53%
0.00%
2.33%
3.49%
3.49%
4.65%
3.49%
8.33%
4.65%
8.14%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
i. Information about Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human subjects…
h. Information about copyright
g. Support in data collection
f. Resources availability
e. Supervisor feedback provided in a timely manner
d. Quality of thesis supervision
c. Availability of readers
b. Availability of your thesis supervisor for consultation
a. Availability of suitable thesis supervisors
Students' Satisfaction with the Thesis Experience
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
0.97
0.99
1.05
1.07
1.12
1.15
1.23
1.24
1.27
Support in data collection
Availability of readers
Availability of suitable thesis supervisors
Information about copyright
Quality of thesis supervision
Supervisor feedback provided in a timely manner
Information about Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human subjects…
Resources availability
Availability of your thesis supervisor for consultation
Students' Weighted Average Satisfaction with Thesis Experience
Q18: HOW HELPFUL WAS/WERE YOUR SUPERVISOR(S) FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES?
VERY HELPFUL HELPFUL
NOT VERY
HELPFUL NOT HELPFUL AT
ALL TOTAL
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
a. Identification of a thesis/dissertation research topic
Count 48 29 9 1 87 3.43
% Percentage of Total
55.17% 33.33% 10.34% 1.15%
b. Support in writing a thesis/dissertation proposal
Count 41 36 7 3 87 3.32
% Percentage of Total
47.13% 41.38% 8.05% 3.45%
c. Support in research methodology
Count 40 31 13 3 87 3.24
% Percentage of Total
45.98% 35.63% 14.94% 3.45%
d. Evaluation of thesis progress
Count 43 30 10 4 87 3.29
% Percentage of Total
49.43% 34.48% 11.49% 4.60%
e. Mentoring and academic advising
Count 50 29 7 1 87 3.47
% Percentage of Total
57.47% 33.33% 8.05% 1.15%
f. Information about IRB Count 39 33 10 2 84 3.30
% Percentage of Total
46.43% 39.29% 11.90% 2.38%
46.43%
57.47%
49.43%
45.98%
47.13%
55.17%
39.29%
33.33%
34.48%
35.63%
41.38%
33.33%
11.90%
8.05%
11.49%
14.94%
8.05%
10.34%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
f. Information about IRB
e. Mentoring and academic advising
d. Evaluation of thesis progress
c.support in research methodology
b. Support in writing a thesis/dissertation proposal
a. Identification of a thesis/dissertation research topic
Helpfulness of Thesis Supervisor
Very helpful Helpful Not very helpful Not helpful at all
3.24
3.29
3.30
3.32
3.43
3.47
support in research methodology
Evaluation of thesis progress
Information about IRB
Support in writing a thesis/dissertation proposal
Identification of a thesis/dissertation research topic
Mentoring and academic advising
Weighted Average of Helpfulness of Thesis Supervisor
Q19: PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE THESIS SUBMISSION SUPPORT
YES NO TOTAL
Have you submitted your thesis to turnitin to check for plagiarism?
Count 58 28 86
% Percentage of Total 67.44% 32.56%
Have you submitted copies of the pre-final draft to thesis supervisor and readers as directed?
Count 85 1 86
% Percentage of Total 98.84% 1.16%
Have you uploaded a soft copy of your thesis to the AUC DAR Repository?
Count 77 9 86
% Percentage of Total 89.53% 10.47%
89.53%
98.84%
67.44%
10.47%
1.16%
32.56%
c. Have you uploaded a soft copy of your thesis to the AUC DAR Repository?
b. Have you submitted copies of the pre-final draft to thesis supervisor and readersas directed?
a. Have you submitted your thesis to turnitin to check for plagiarism?
Thesis Submission Support
Yes No
OVERALL ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
Q20: IF YOU ATTENDED ANY OF THE FOLLOWING WORKSHOPS, PLEASE INDICATE THE LEVEL OF USEFULLNESS
VERY USEFUL
USEFUL NOT
USEFUL
NOT USEFUL AT
ALL N/A TOTAL
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
(-2 TO 2)
a. Academic integrity and research ethics
Count 24 37 3 4 18 86 1.09
% from total responses 27.91% 43.02% 3.49% 4.65% 20.93%
b. Presentation skills Count 11 24 2 2 37 76 1.03
% from total responses 14.47% 31.58% 2.63% 2.63% 48.68%
c. Thesis proposal writing Count 13 30 5 1 28 77 1.00
% from total responses 16.88% 38.96% 6.49% 1.30% 36.36%
d. Research methodology Count 14 14 4 2 42 76 1.00
% from total responses 18.42% 18.42% 5.26% 2.63% 55.26%
e. Literature review and abstract
Count 22 16 3 1 35 77 1.31
% from total responses 28.57% 20.78% 3.90% 1.30% 45.45%
f. Library research guidance
Count 15 30 3 0 29 77 1.19
% from total responses 19.48% 38.96% 3.90% 0.00% 37.66%
g. Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...)
Count 4 7 2 2 57 72 0.60
% from total responses 5.56% 9.72% 2.78% 2.78% 79.17%
h. How to apply for Ph.D Count 0 6 2 1 62 71 0.22
% from total responses 0.00% 8.45% 2.82% 1.41% 87.32%
i. Grant proposal writing Count 3 6 1 1 58 69 0.82
% from total responses 4.35% 8.70% 1.45% 1.45% 84.06%
4.35%
5.56%
19.48%
28.57%
18.42%
16.88%
14.47%
27.91%
8.70%
8.45%
9.72%
38.96%
20.78%
18.42%
38.96%
31.58%
43.02%
1.45%
2.82%
2.78%
3.90%
3.90%
5.26%
6.49%
2.63%
3.49%
i. Grant proposal writing
h. How to apply for Ph.D
g. Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...)
f. Library research guidance
e. Literature review and abstract
d. Research methodology
c. Thesis proposal writing
b. Presentation skills
a. Academic integrity and research ethics
Usefulness of Academic Workshops
Very useful Useful Not useful Not useful at all
0.22
0.6
0.82
1
1
1.03
1.09
1.19
1.31
How to apply for Ph.D
Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...)
Grant proposal writing
Thesis proposal writing
Research methodology
Presentation skills
Academic integrity and research ethics
Library research guidance
Literature review and abstract
Weighted Average Usefulness of Academic Workshops Rating
WHICH OF THESE WORKSHOPS WOULD YOU RECOMMEND TO YOUR FELLOW COLLEAGUES AS THE MOST USEFUL?
Academic integrity and research ethics (6) Presentation skills (5) Thesis proposal writing (4) Research methodology (3) Literature review and abstract (8)
Library research guidance (4) Statistical package (SPSS, survey monkey, etc ...) (1) How to apply for Ph.D (0) Grant proposal writing (1)
1
1
1
3
3
4
4
5
6
8
None
Grant proposal writing
Statistical package
All
Research methodology
Library research guidance
Thesis proposal writing
Presentation skills
Academic integrity and research ethics
Literature review and abstract
Workshop Recommendations
Q21: PLEASE RATE THE QUALITY OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
EXCELLENT VERY
GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR N/A TOTAL
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
(1 TO 5)
a. Your academic advising Count 35 35 15 9 3 0 97 3.93
% Percentage of Total 36.08% 36.08% 15.46% 9.28% 3.09% 0.00%
b. The graduate program curriculum
Count 21 48 16 9 3 0 97 3.77
% Percentage of Total 21.65% 49.48% 16.49% 9.28% 3.09% 0.00%
c. Opportunities for interaction with faculty
Count 34 43 10 7 2 0 96 4.04
% Percentage of Total 35.42% 44.79% 10.42% 7.29% 2.08% 0.00%
d. Opportunities to work with diverse groups in team projects
Count 31 29 15 12 5 5 97 3.75
% Percentage of Total 31.96% 29.90% 15.46% 12.37% 5.15% 5.15%
e. Opportunities to do research in your area of interest
Count 41 27 16 3 9 1 97 3.92
% Percentage of Total 42.27% 27.84% 16.49% 3.09% 9.28% 1.03%
f. Availability of courses you needed
Count 16 37 27 9 7 1 97 3.48
% Percentage of Total 16.49% 38.14% 27.84% 9.28% 7.22% 1.03%
g. Scheduling of your graduate courses
Count 23 38 26 7 3 0 97 3.73
% Percentage of Total 23.71% 39.18% 26.80% 7.22% 3.09% 0.00%
h. Academic standard of your peers in the program
Count 28 37 20 8 2 1 96 3.85
% Percentage of Total 29.17% 38.54% 20.83% 8.33% 2.08% 1.04%
i. Resources for research Count 42 37 11 4 0 2 96 4.24
% Percentage of Total 43.75% 38.54% 11.46% 4.17% 0.00% 2.08%
j. Library hours Count 47 31 13 4 0 2 97 4.27
% Percentage of Total 48.45% 31.96% 13.40% 4.12% 0.00% 2.06%
48.45%
43.75%
29.17%
23.71%
16.49%
42.27%
31.96%
35.42%
21.65%
36.08%
31.96%
38.54%
38.54%
39.18%
38.14%
27.84%
29.90%
44.79%
49.48%
36.08%
13.40%
11.46%
20.83%
26.80%
27.84%
16.49%
15.46%
10.42%
16.49%
15.46%
j. Library hours
i. Resources for research
h. Academic standard of your peers in the program
g. Scheduling of your graduate courses
f. Availability of courses you needed
e. Opportunities to do research in your area of interest
d. Opportunities to work with diverse groups in team projects
c. Opportunities for interaction with faculty
b. The graduate program curriculum
a. Your academic advising
Student Ratings regarding Quality of Academic Experience
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
3.48
3.73
3.75
3.77
3.85
3.92
3.93
4.04
4.24
4.27
Availability of courses you needed
Scheduling of your graduate courses
Opportunities to work with diverse groups in team projects
The graduate program curriculum
Academic standard of your peers in the program
Opportunities to do research in your area of interest
Your academic advising
Opportunities for interaction with faculty
Resources for research
Library hours
Average Rating Weight of Academic Experiences
Q22: PLEASE INDICATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH YOUR GRADUATE EDUCATION AT AUC IS ENHANCING THESE SKILLS.
TO A GREAT
EXTENT TO SOME EXTENT
NOT AT ALL TOTAL
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
(1 TO 3)
a. Become an expert in your field
Count 36 57 4 97 2.33
% Percentage of Total 37.11% 58.76% 4.12%
b. Be up to date with the latest research techniques
Count 52 39 6 97 2.47
% Percentage of Total 53.61% 40.21% 6.19%
c. Write quality papers ready for publication
Count 50 38 9 97 2.42
% Percentage of Total 51.55% 39.18% 9.28%
d. Present research results to an audience of peers or at a conference
Count 45 41 9 95 2.38
% Percentage of Total 47.37% 43.16% 9.47%
e. Write grant proposals Count 19 44 29 92 1.89
% Percentage of Total 20.65% 47.83% 31.52%
f. Supervise others
Count 35 40 21 96 2.15
% Percentage of Total 36.46% 41.67% 21.88%
g. Become a qualified teacher
Count 37 44 15 96 2.23
% Percentage of Total 38.54% 45.83% 15.63%
h. Collaborate with a team
Count 56 30 11 97 2.46
% Percentage of Total 57.73% 30.93% 11.34%
i. Become a team leader
Count 45 37 14 96 2.32
% Percentage of Total 46.88% 38.54% 14.58%
j. Understand the principles of ethical conduct in research
Count 76 18 3 97 2.75
% Percentage of Total 78.35% 18.56% 3.09%
k. Keep up with current advances in your field
Count 58 32 7 97 2.53
% Percentage of Total 59.79% 32.99% 7.22%
59.79%
78.35%
46.88%
57.73%
38.14%
36.46%
20.65%
47.37%
51.55%
53.61%
37.11%
32.99%
18.56%
38.54%
30.93%
45.36%
41.67%
47.83%
43.16%
39.18%
40.21%
58.76%
7.22%
3.09%
14.58%
11.34%
15.46%
21.88%
31.52%
9.47%
9.28%
6.19%
4.12%
k. Keep up with current advances in your field
j. Understand the principles of ethical conduct in research
i. Become a team leader
h. Collaborate with a team
g. Become a qualified teacher
f. Supervise others
e. Write grant proposals
d. Present research results to an audience of peers or at a conference
c. Write quality papers ready for publication
b. Be up to date with the latest research methods
a. Become an expert in your field
The Extent to which Graduate Education at AUC Enhances Students' Skills
To a great extent To some extent Not at all
1.89
2.15
2.23
2.32
2.33
2.38
2.42
2.46
2.47
2.53
2.75
Write grant proposals
Supervise others
Become a qualified teacher
Become a team leader
Become an expert in your field
Present research results to an audience of peers or at a conference
Write quality papers ready for publication
Collaborate with a team
Be up to date with the latest research methods
Keep up with current advances in your field
Understand the principles of ethical conduct in research
Weighted Average Skill Enhancement
PART III: STUDENTS RATING OF THEIR EXPERIENCE AND THE PROVIDED SUPPORT SERVICES
Q23: OVERALL, AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT AUC, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING?
EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE
a. Your academic experience
Count 37 47 9 3 1 97 4.20
% Percentage of Total 38.14% 48.45% 9.28% 3.09% 1.03%
b. Your student life experience
Count 33 33 21 8 2 97 3.90
% Percentage of Total 34.02% 34.02% 21.65% 8.25% 2.06%
c. Your personal development opportunities
Count 37 40 15 4 1 97 4.11
% Percentage of Total 38.14% 41.24% 15.46% 4.12% 1.03%
d. Your professional development opportunities
Count 32 36 18 10 1 97 3.91
% Percentage of Total 32.99% 37.11% 18.56% 10.31% 1.03%
e. Quality of instruction in your courses
Count 37 41 15 2 2 97 4.12
% Percentage of Total 38.14% 42.27% 15.46% 2.06% 2.06%
f. Quality of your courses
Count 28 39 23 6 1 97 3.90
% Percentage of Total 28.87% 40.21% 23.71% 6.19% 1.03%
g. Academic mentoring support
Count 36 35 18 6 2 97 4.00
% Percentage of Total 37.11% 36.08% 18.56% 6.19% 2.06%
37.11%
28.87%
38.14%
32.99%
38.14%
34.02%
38.14%
36.08%
40.21%
42.27%
37.11%
41.24%
34.02%
48.45%
18.56%
23.71%
15.46%
18.56%
15.46%
21.65%
9.28%
g. Academic mentoring support
f. Quality of your courses
e. Quality of instruction in your courses
d. Your professional development opportunities
c. Your personal development opportunities
b. Your student life experience
a. Your academic experience
Student Ratings
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
3.90
3.90
3.91
4.00
4.11
4.12
4.20
Your student life experience
Quality of your courses
Your professional development opportunities
Academic mentoring support
Your personal development opportunities
Quality of instruction in your courses
Your academic experience
Weighted Average Student Ratings
Q24: PLEASE RATE THE QUALITY OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SUPPORT SERVICES
EXCELLENT
VERY
GOOD GOOD AVERAGE POOR N/A TOTAL
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE (1 TO 6)
a. Graduate Students Academic Workshops
Count 16 27 21 6 1 0 90 4.72
% Percentage of Total 17.78% 30.00% 23.33% 6.67% 1.11% 0.00%
b. Conference, Research and Study Abroad Support Grants
Count 16 20 12 6 3 1 90 4.64
% Percentage of Total 17.78% 22.22% 13.33% 6.67% 3.33% 1.11%
c. Bus Transportation schedule Count 17 16 18 8 0 3 90 4.53
% Percentage of Total 18.89% 17.78% 20.00% 8.89% 0.00% 3.33%
d. Food service availability Count 9 23 25 14 4 3 87 4.13
% Percentage of Total 10.34% 26.44% 28.74% 16.09% 4.60% 3.45%
e. Medical department services
Count 13 17 17 5 2 0 89 4.63
% Percentage of Total 14.61% 19.10% 19.10% 5.62% 2.25% 0.00%
f. Social activities for Graduate students
Count 9 12 18 13 2 4 90 4.02
% Percentage of Total 10.00% 13.33% 20.00% 14.44% 2.22% 4.44%
g. Services of the student counseling center
Count 10 9 10 3 1 1 88 4.62
% Percentage of Total 11.36% 10.23% 11.36% 3.41% 1.14% 1.14%
h. Services of the student mentoring unit
Count 10 5 11 4 1 1 89 4.50
% Percentage of Total 11.24% 5.62% 12.36% 4.49% 1.12% 1.12%
i. Career Center
Count 14 13 19 4 3 3 89 4.39
% Percentage of Total 15.73% 14.61% 21.35% 4.49% 3.37% 3.37%
j. Internship opportunities Count 9 9 10 11 3 3 89 4.02
% Percentage of Total 10.11% 10.11% 11.24% 12.36% 3.37% 3.37%
k. Teaching assistantship opportunities
Count 16 17 14 15 1 3 90 4.35
% Percentage of Total 17.78% 18.89% 15.56% 16.67% 1.11% 3.33%
l. Work study opportunities Count 10 17 12 5 3 1 90 4.48
% Percentage of Total 11.11% 18.89% 13.33% 5.56% 3.33% 1.11%
m. E-mail and internet services Count 53 19 10 2 2 1 89 5.33
% Percentage of Total 59.55% 21.35% 11.24% 2.25% 2.25% 1.12%
n. WiFi services on campus Count 44 24 11 5 2 1 90 5.15
% Percentage of Total 48.89% 26.67% 12.22% 5.56% 2.22% 1.11%
o. Photocopy & printing Count 28 24 23 6 5 1 90 4.70
EXCELLENT
VERY
GOOD GOOD AVERAGE POOR N/A TOTAL
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE (1 TO 6)
services on campus % Percentage of Total 31.11% 26.67% 25.56% 6.67% 5.56% 1.11%
p. Athletics department
Count 16 17 8 3 0 1 89 4.96
% Percentage of Total 17.98% 19.10% 8.99% 3.37% 0.00% 1.12%
q. Payment of stipend for fellows
Count 19 13 12 9 2 2 89 4.56
% Percentage of Total 21.35% 14.61% 13.48% 10.11% 2.25% 2.25%
r. Public lectures and Seminars Count 14 26 31 3 1 2 90 4.56
% Percentage of Total 15.56% 28.89% 34.44% 3.33% 1.11% 2.22%
s. Graduate Student Association
Count 8 13 19 5 2 0 88 4.43
% Percentage of Total 9.09% 14.77% 21.59% 5.68% 2.27% 0.00%
9.09%
15.56%
21.35%
17.98%
31.11%
48.89%
59.55%
11.11%
17.78%
10.11%
15.73%
11.24%
11.36%
10.00%
14.61%
10.34%
18.89%
17.78%
17.78%
14.77%
28.89%
14.61%
19.10%
26.67%
26.67%
21.35%
18.89%
18.89%
10.11%
14.61%
5.62%
10.23%
13.33%
19.10%
26.44%
17.78%
22.22%
30.00%
21.59%
34.44%
13.48%
8.99%
25.56%
12.22%
11.24%
13.33%
15.56%
11.24%
21.35%
12.36%
11.36%
20.00%
19.10%
28.74%
20.00%
13.33%
23.33%
5.68%
3.33%
10.11%
3.37%
6.67%
5.56%
2.25%
5.56%
16.67%
12.36%
4.49%
4.49%
3.41%
14.44%
5.62%
16.09%
8.89%
6.67%
6.67%
s. Graduate Student Association
r. Public lectures and Seminars
q. Payment of stipend for fellows
p. Athletics department
o. Photocopy & printing services on campus
n. WiFi services on campus
m. E-mail and internet services
l. Work study opportunities
k. Teaching assistantship opportunities
j. Internship opportunities
i. Career Center
h. Services of the student mentoring unit
g. Services of the student counseling center
f. Social activities for Graduate students
e. Medical department services
d. Food service availability
c. Bus Transportation schedule
b. Conference, Research and Study Abroad Support Grants
a. Graduate Students Academic Workshops
Rating of the Quality of Support Services
Excellent Very Good Good Average Fair Poor
4.02
4.02
4.13
4.35
4.39
4.43
4.48
4.50
4.53
4.56
4.56
4.62
4.63
4.64
4.70
4.72
4.96
5.15
5.33
Social activities for Graduate students
Internship opportunities
Food service availability
Teaching assistantship opportunities
Career Center
Graduate Student Association
Work study opportunities
Services of the student mentoring unit
Bus Transportation schedule
Payment of stipend for fellows
Public lectures and Seminars
Services of the student counseling center
Medical department services
Conference, Research and Study Abroad Support Grants
Photocopy & printing services on campus
Graduate Students Academic Workshops
Athletics department
WiFi services on campus
E-mail and internet services
Weighted Average Rating of Support Services
PART IV: OVERALL STUDENT SATISFACTION
Q25: OVERALL, INDICATE YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT AUC
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
(FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 92)
Very satisfied 34 37.0%
Satisfied 51 55.4%
Neutral 4 4.3%
Dissatisfied 3 3.3%
Very dissatisfied 0 0.0%
Total 92
Missing 18
Q12: WOULD YOU RECOMMEND AUC TO A FRIEND OR COLLEAGUE CONSIDERING YOUR FIELD OF STUDY?
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE (FROM TOTAL RESPONSES TO
THIS QUESTION 107)
Definitely 55 51.4%
Probably 34 31.8%
Maybe 16 15.0%
Definitely not 2 1.9%
Total 107
Missing 13
0.0%
3.3%
4.3%
37.0%
55.4%
Very dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Overall Satisfaction Level
1.9%
15.0%
31.8%
51.4%
Definitely not
Maybe
Probably
Definitely
Would You Recommend AUC to a friend considering your field of study?
PART V: STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT REPORTED BY THEME (QUESTIONS 26, 27 & 28) Strengths
THEME COMMENT MAJOR
Academic Experience
Strong colleagues Some great professors Up to date with latest scientific research topics Good system Supportive department at solving students problems Good envirnoment for innovation
Computer Science
The academic experience and the exposure to researches. Construction Engineering
The diversity of courses The strength of the majority of the professors Developing the ability to work with different types of people through the team work Enhancing Presentation Skills Reading and analyzing published research papers
Master of Business Admin.
The constant help available The Courses The lectures Master of Global Affairs
Courses, quality of professors, being up to date with global and local news and policy issues Availability for funds and scholarships for graduate students
Master in Public Administration
Academic writing, research excellence, and high quality publications Mechanical Engineering
Political Science Decent quality of education capitalizing on well-established and strong faculty members from around the world, while maintaining the culture of the region.
Academic Program the program is unique and the first of its kind " Sustainable development". the best 2 courses I took were basic concepts and applications for social and environmental policies: by Aisha Saad Cities structures and dynamics: Mona Abaza
Sustainable Development
Academic Program: Elective Courses
The elective courses outside my department Journalism & Mass Communication
Diversity AUC's diversity warmth and standards of peers and instructors Master in Public Policy
Facilities: Library The Library Experience Journalism & Mass Communication
Faculty
Being taught be professional professors in the field, and being surrounded by active and hard working students
Computer Science
Most of the professors are unique in their field; moreover, academic or professional materials are always up-to-date
Executive MBA
my thesis supervisor, and freedom to chose what ever topic i want Journalism & Mass Communication
Professional instructors Latest knowledge Master of Business Admin.
communication with professors Masters in Public Administration
exposed to well educated and high calibers faculty Masters in Public Administration
My interaction with some professors who truly motovated me to fulfill my potential
Middle East Studies
The richness of knowledge my professors contributed in every class Migration and Refugee Studies
Faculty
Faculty & Students
I enjoyed working and studying with a group of talented and caring colleagues, most of whom were different from me in many ways, but we all got along really well and respected each other's opinions and tastes. It was also an honor to take classes led by experts in their respective fields - Dr. Plumlee has been especially inspirational to me.
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
Financial Assistance & Research
Being granted conference grants to be exposed to the research community worldwide.
PhD in Applied Science
Learning Experience 1- It was a great chance to meet AUC professors and staff and share their experiences. 2- AUC was a great opportunity to conduct research. 3- AUC provided me with all resources and facilities needed for my research.
Biotechnology
1- some of the graduate courses were useful and helpful 2- Professors are cooperative with strong academic and scientific level 3- Reseach tools are largely provided 4- New campus is awsome 5- Email service is great 6- Events and ceremonies are well organized 7- Generally, the surrendered atmosphere is supporting and motivating
Construction Engineering
Diversity, professional and personal development opportunities, reputable organization to have a graduate degree from.
Masters in Public Administration
The exposure to a such diversified community from peers to AUC qualified staff, as well to well articulated curricula. The experience has with no doubt strengthen several skill such as public speaking skills, presentation, and research methodology.
Masters in Public Administration
1- Academic experience; 2- Practical experience; 3- Research methods experience; 4- Writing well-performed papers ; 5- Learning a lot of software programs; 6- Working well in team work.
PhD in Engineering
AUC has provided a unique academic sphere in which one were able to know, to question, to learn, and to be a knowledge seeker.
Sociology Anthropology
being updated with the latest trends in the field. Opportunities to teach abroad Teaching Arabic as a Foreign
through related emailing lists. Encouragement by professors for further development
Language
Other Had strong academic background that was suitable for the program Economics
Being exposed to new areas in my field of experience Journalism & Mass Communication
Everything Master of Public Policy & Adm.
Research The ability of using research tools and enhancing the academic writing skill in addition to gaining the experience in the lab work.
Biotechnology
enhanced my writing and research skills Educational Leadership
To some extent enhancement in the research skills Masters International and Comparative Law
I have learned to collect data and work on a research Mechanical Engineering
Research skills Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Skills: Presentation writing and presentation skills Chemistry
Skills: Presentation & Facilities: Library
_Enhancing presentation and communication skills through course presentations _E-library was time saving and user-friendly, especially for people who work full time and cannot be physically present at the university for long hours. _Availability of readers and supervisors for thesis writers.
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
Skills: Reading & Writing Reading and writing skills Master of Public Policy & Adm.
Skills: Research & Presentation enhanced my ability to conduct research enhanced my presentation skills better team working the ability to present ideas and research results
Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Staff & Resources Advising and resourses International & Comparative Education
Weaknesses
THEME COMMENT MAJOR
Academic Experience 1- Fees are increasing in an incredible rates 2- Some graduate courses are not provided 3- Social and sportive activities for graduates are missing 4- Registration services are not well organized (Fair)
Construction Engineering
I had better expectations for the learning/academic experience. Masters in Public Administration
Academic Program
content of courses Chemistry
Core course scheduling was problematic causing delays in finalization of program Economics
courses need to be more diverse to match diverse needs Educational Leadership
-The research methods courses and understanding data analysis methodologies. -practically integrating courses to authentic projects.
International & Comparative Education
Little gained knowledge, not a lot of critical thinking, classic theories only, very little interaction with other disciplines despite the importance of such interactions, disappointing thesis supervision, discussions are very Egypt-centric and Cairo-centric, a lot of the courses were super easy anyone can pass even if they didn't really learn much, no clear guidance in thesis process
Journalism & Mass Communication
the unavailability of some courses in mass communication Journalism & Mass Communication
Courses not egyptionized enough and more field work is needed Master in Public Policy
Some courses need to be updated and others need to be given early in the program such as the research methods, qualitative and quantitative analysis courses. Also the program stated that students can choose either quantitaive or qualitative, however students of MPP or MPA should have the knowledge of both and should take both compulosry. Also some courses in my decipline are extremely important but lacked the needed tools for teaching and enhancing the capabilities of students, such as the policy analysis and program evaluation. First, I suggest that this course should be two; policy analysis course and another for program evaluation. Second, there should be standard case studies used as tools to train students on policy analysis and in different policy areas.
Master in Public Policy
Out of the 15 courses I studied, I recall at least 5 courses that were a complete waste of time because of the extremely poor quality and ability of the instructors.
Master of Business Admin.
unavailability of the adviser and prejudging the quality of student performance. Master of Public Policy & Adm.
lack of courses Masters in Public
Administration
Not focused enough on a certain topic Mechanical Engineering
Unavailability of some graduate courses Mechanical Engineering
_ Unavailability of some courses (were not offered for 6 successive semesters) although they were in the catalog (i.e.; curriculum design). _Very limited summer course offerings (only one course was offered and there were not any summer offerings in summer, 2016). _ Unavailability of exchange programs with other universities outside Egypt especially in the US, which could have added to the value and richness of the program. Other departments for example have exchange programs with UCLA and University of Texas.
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
I do wish that more general Applied Linguistics courses were offered, but perhaps because the department size is so small, it is not possible to offer more at the moment. As I mentioned earlier in the survey, I have much more of an interest in research-related work (either more general non-pedagogy language-research or ESL research) rather than an interest in teaching in the classroom. I wish that more courses in the MA TESOL program could be offered for those who prefer behind-the-scenes research and development. It would also be helpful to learn more about how to bridge theory and practice, when certain individuals are more comfortable with the former and others with the latter (i.e. looking beyond the single teacher-researcher in the classroom, to how researchers/agencies work with practitioners/academic institutions).
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
Administrative Issues Bad management of university resources inside departments Low budget for research and graduate studies research grants.
Computer Science
Some routine work of papers. Master of Public Policy & Adm.
Discrimination Some level of discrimination against particular student groups. Low stipend rates to fellows.
Computer Science
Exams the comprehensive exams Journalism & Mass Communication
Faculty
There was a lack of professors in the field of Islamic studies, which makes the options in the choice of the supervisor low. There is a need for more professors with more specific specializations in this field.
Arabic Studies
I did face a lot of obstacles in dealing with my supervisor. In my point of view we apply to graduate problems so we can continue our learning process in each field. The feed back that i always got from my supervisor is always negative feedback. It was not pleasant experience at all dealing with my supervisor as i always got the feeling whenever i ask a question is that i m stupid and this is not the purpose of
Biotechnology
me continuing my education i have applied for graduate studies to learn not to feel i m asking stupid question always. The thesis experience was really not good. Although from all the other courses the professors were extremely helpful and always are there to provide us with the needed information and knowledge.
Very complicated law professors Masters International and Comparative Law
Some professors who did not succeed in inspiring students Middle East Studies
not all the professors are good enough Sustainable Development
Grading System, Research & Faculty
The high dependency of the course grading on group work versus actual studying and research Research weakness Some of the professors were not qualified enough to teach
Master of Business Admin.
None
None that is very obvious Master of Global Affairs
I didn't realize any substantial weaknesses Executive MBA
NA Sociology Anthropology
Other
They are personal weaknesses Biotechnology
Time management Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Research very little exposure to industry support for research and thesis writing not available from very early
Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Schedule SCHEDULES SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATCH THE NEEDS Masters in Public Administration
Student Engagement No team work in our research since we are very few and each one is working in a separate field with a professor. Professors do not cooperate in joint research work that enable their students to work jointly.
PhD in Applied Science
Student Life As a graduate I had no time to participate in the universities activities Construction Engineering
Support Services: Academic Advising
Diversity of courses and available information Masters in Public Administration
Academic advising should be more emphasized. Political Science
Support Services: Food Outlet Food Options :) Journalism & Mass Communication
Suggestions for Improvement
THEME COMMENT MAJOR
Academic Program
Develop programs that would suit full time working graduate students Extend hours of rare books library Supply more work experience programs and student involvement in projects if possible (for Art history students in the islamic arts and architecture department)
Arabic Studies
Core courses should be run both in the Fall and in Spring terms Economics
JRMC department must advance the student's way of thinking. Level of many students after graduation is not significantly different than the level of the layman. Teaching mush involve critical thinking, must avoid being Egypt-centric must focus on a variety of time eras not just the past few years. Students after graduation will have a very small amount of knowledge about Arab or international media and are only introduced to a small amount of books and journal articles. JRMC must avoid cliché arguments and must include a lot more in theory. We studied none of the media theories from the left, we were not introduced to the work of Gramsci or Chomsky for example and we rarely studies media in relevance to other disciplines. This is very crucial in media studies. I even took a graduate course in media and psychology which introduced us to none of the psychological theories and concepts. This to me was troubling, i would sometimes be learning more from my own personal readings than from class. I took elective courses in Political Science, Refugee Studies and History, all three were significantly different than my experience with JRMC and i learned amazing things from these three courses, things that actually make a paradigm shift in my thinking and analytical skills and the amount of reading in these courses surpasses the amount of reading in my JRMC classes. The debates in these classes touched on so many countries other than Egypt and tackled different disciplines. Students looking for a learning experience can truly benefit from such classes but not much from JRMC classes. On another note: Why does the AUC have a huge photo of Elbaradei? Why would a respectable university have a photo of a specific political figure? I mean the revolution photos are great but Elbaradei, really? Why him? Either the AUC puts huge photos of many political figures or put none of them. This partisan spirit is rude and a cause of concern.
Journalism & Mass Communication
provide more phd programs to include humanities, public policy, and JRMC. Journalism & Mass Communication
Stated above. Master in Public Policy
adding modern and new courses Masters in Public
Administration
The public administration program needs to be restructured in a way that is consistent with a particular vision for its graduates. For example, If you want to graduate professionals and practitioners in the fields of public administration and development, then you must structure the courses and the professors you select around that objective. Some of the professors have very good academic experience with little professional and practical experience, and they keep teaching courses that are practical in nature.
Masters in Public Administration
The masters program needs to be more focused in my department not just a collection of courses like an undergraduate
Mechanical Engineering
_Providing a PHD and an MA degree in linguistics, since the university has a department of applied linguistics.
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
Some possible courses for consideration in the future: Linguistics: - Phonetics and Phonemics - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Psycholinguistics Language and Culture: - Ethnography - Culture and Literacy Pedagogical Theory and Development: - Historical Foundations of Language Pedagogies - Curriculum Development - ESL Materials Development
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
Administration Issues Quality checking on resources utilization Computer Science
Very expensive Construction Engineering
Costs of Graduates studies are becoming extremely expensive. Nanotechnology
Diversity Please don't limit the availability of master degree to staff members in one program. Master of Public Policy & Adm.
Administrative Issues
Reduce the AUC beaurocracy, and either provide training to the admin team on how to manage a program, communication and writings skills and customer satisfaction.
MBA
Exams i think the program will be much better if we canceled the comprehensive exams as we already are required to register for a thesis. so its either to have a thesis or comprehensive
Journalism & Mass Communication
Facilities: Labs Computer Science major needs more test bed labs to facilitate practical experiments for graduate research. AsPhD students, we need more variations of courses to select from. Each semester we had to submit a petition to open a new course since we have already taken all the Masters courses.
PhD in Applied Science
Faculty
Change law department professors Masters International and Comparative Law
need more incentives to attract a diverse range of professors from abroad to enrich the range of knowledge
Sustainable Development
Change law department professors Masters International and Comparative Law
Financials & Diversity Improve income/stipend for fellows. Accept diversity and allow every eligible student to become a fellow/teaching assistant.
Computer Science
Library Learning environment in library needs to be improved seriously. As far as I know, most foreign students do not go to library to study. We always complain about it. Too noisy.
POLS
None Thanks! Master of Public Policy & Adm.
Thanks for the enriching experience i had in your university. Masters in Public Administration
Nothing Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Thank you Sociology Anthropology
Research -Including an advanced research course as a requirement for graduation International & Comparative Education
It would be useful to stress on enhancing research methodology tools and skills. As for the public policy and administration department, there is a necessity to take more into consideration the egyptian setting and it is vital to propose more practicum courses.
Masters in Public Administration
thesis and research guidance to be available from the very beginning the ability to choose from more than 1 supervisor for your thesis better regulation for the TA duties
Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
Schedule more classes at 5:00 p.m. Masters in Public Administration
Support Services: Food Outlet This semester Food options improved, but it is not enough. AUC community is big and food options are not an extra thing. It is essential because many students, professors, and staff spend long days on the campus. So, a variety of affordable good food is highly needed.
Journalism & Mass Communication
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT REPORTED BY MAJOR
Arabic World Studies
WEAKNESSES (1)
Faculty There was a lack of professors in the field of Islamic studies, which makes the options in the choice of the supervisor low. There is a need for more professors with more specific specializations in this field.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Academic Program Develop programs that would suit full time working graduate students Extend hours of rare books library Supply more work experience programs and student involvement in projects if possible (for Art history students in the islamic arts and architecture department)
Biotechnology
STRENGTHS (2)
Learning Experience 1- It was a great chance to meet AUC professors and staff and share their experiences. 2- AUC was a great opportunity to conduct research. 3- AUC provided me with all resources and facilities needed for my research.
Research The ability of using research tools and enhancing the academic writing skill in addition to gaining the experience in the lab work.
WEAKNESSES (2)
Faculty I did face a lot of obstacles in dealing with my supervisor. In my point of view we apply to graduate problems so we can continue our learning process in each field. The feed back that i always got from my supervisor is always negative feedback. It was not pleasant experience at all dealing with my supervisor as i always got the feeling whenever i ask a question is that i m stupid and this is not the purpose of me continuing my education i have applied for graduate studies to learn not to feel i m asking stupid question always. The thesis experience was really not good. Although from all the other courses the professors were extremely helpful and always are there to provide us with the needed information and knowledge.
Other They are personal weaknesses
Chemistry
STRENGTHS (1)
Skills: Presentation writing and presentation skills
WEAKNESSES (1)
Academic Program content of courses
Computer Science
STRENGTHS (2)
Academic Experience Strong colleagues Some great professors Up to date with latest scientific research topics Good system Supportive department at solving students problems Good envirnoment for innovation
Faculty Being taught be professional professors in the field, and being surrounded by active and hard working students
WEAKNESSES (2)
Administration Issues Bad management of university resources inside departments Low budget for research and graduate studies research grants.
Discrimination Some level of discrimination against particular student groups. Low stipend rates to fellows.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2)
Administration Issues Quality checking on resources utilization
Financials & Diversity Improve income/stipend for fellows. Accept diversity and allow every eligible student to become a fellow/teaching assistant.
Construction Engineering
STRENGTHS (2)
Academic Experience The academic experience and the exposure to researches.
Learning Experience 1- some of the graduate courses were useful and helpful 2- Professors are cooperative with strong academic and scientific level 3- Reseach tools are largely provided 4- New campus is awsome 5- Email service is great 6- Events and ceremonies are well organized 7- Generally, the surrendered atmosphere is supporting and motivating
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Experience 1- Fees are increasing in an incredible rates 2- Some graduate courses are not provided 3- Social and sportive activities for graduates are missing 4- Registration services are not well organized (Fair)
Student Life As a graduate I had no time to participate in the universities activities
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Administration Issues Very expensive
Economics
STRENGTHS (1)
Other Had strong academic background that was suitable for the program
WEAKNESSES (1)
Academic Program Core course scheduling was problematic causing delays in finalization of program
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Academic Program Core courses should be run both in the Fall and in Spring terms
Educational Leadership
STRENGTHS (1)
Research enhanced my writing and research skills
WEAKNESSES (1)
Academic Program courses need to be more diverse to match diverse needs
Executive MBA
STRENGTHS (1)
Faculty Most of the professors are unique in their field; moreover, academic or professional materials are always up-to-date
WEAKNESSES (1)
None I didn't realize any substantial weaknesses
International & Comparative Education
STRENGTHS (1)
Staff & Resources Advising and resourses
WEAKNESSES (1)
Academic Program -The research methods courses and understanding data analysis methodologies. -practically integrating courses to authentic projects.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Research -Including an advanced research course as a requirement for graduation
Journalism & Mass Communication
STRENGTHS (4)
Academic Program: Elective Courses The elective courses outside my department
Facilities: Library The Library Experience
Faculty my thesis supervisor, and freedom to chose what ever topic i want
Other Being exposed to new areas in my field of experience
WEAKNESSES (4)
Academic Program Little gained knowledge, not a lot of critical thinking, classic theories only, very little interaction with other disciplines despite the importance of such interactions, disappointing thesis supervision, discussions are very
Egypt-centric and Cairo-centric, a lot of the courses were super easy anyone can pass even if they didn't really learn much, no clear guidance in thesis process
Academic Program the unavailability of some courses in mass communication
Exams the comprehensive exams
Support Services: Food Outlet Food Options :)
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (4)
Academic Program JRMC department must advance the student's way of thinking. Level of many students after graduation is not significantly different than the level of the layman. Teaching mush involve critical thinking, must avoid being Egypt-centric must focus on a variety of time eras not just the past few years. Students after graduation will have a very small amount of knowledge about Arab or international media and are only introduced to a small amount of books and journal articles. JRMC must avoid cliché arguments and must include a lot more in theory. We studied none of the media theories from the left, we were not introduced to the work of Gramsci or Chomsky for example and we rarely studies media in relevance to other disciplines. This is very crucial in media studies. I even took a graduate course in media and psychology which introduced us to none of the psychological theories and concepts. This to me was troubling, i would sometimes be learning more from my own personal readings than from class. I took elective courses in Political Science, Refugee Studies and History, all three were significantly different than my experience with JRMC and i learned amazing things from these three courses, things that actually make a paradigm shift in my thinking and analytical skills and the amount of reading in these courses surpasses the amount of reading in my JRMC classes. The debates in these classes touched on so many countries other than Egypt and tackled different disciplines. Students looking for a learning experience can truly benefit from such classes but not much from JRMC classes. On another note: Why does the AUC have a huge photo of Elbaradei? Why would a respectable university have a photo of a specific political figure? I mean the revolution photos are great but Elbaradei, really? Why him? Either the AUC puts huge photos of many political figures or put none of them. This partisan spirit is rude and a cause of concern.
Academic Program provide more phd programs to include humanities, public policy, and JRMC.
Exams i think the program will be much better if we canceled the comprehensive exams as we already are required to register for a thesis. so its either to have a thesis or comprehensive
Support Services: Food Outlet This semester Food options improved, but it is not enough. AUC community is big and food options are not an extra thing. It is essential because many students, professors, and staff spend long days on the campus. So, a variety of affordable good food is highly needed.
Master in Public Policy
STRENGTHS (1)
Diversity AUC's diversity warmth and standards of peers and instructors
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Program Courses not egyptionized enough and more field work is needed
Academic Program Some courses need to be updated and others need to be given early in the program such as the research methods, qualitative and quantitative analysis courses. Also the program stated that students can choose either quantitaive or qualitative, however students of MPP or MPA should have the knowledge of both and should take both compulosry. Also some courses in my decipline are extremely important but lacked the needed tools for teaching and enhancing the capabilities of students, such as the policy analysis and program evaluation. First, I suggest that this course should be two; policy analysis course and another for program evaluation. Second, there should be standard case studies used as tools to train students on policy analysis and in different policy areas.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Academic Program Stated above.
Master of Business Admin.
STRENGTHS (2)
Academic Experience The diversity of courses The strength of the majority of the professors Developing the ability to work with different types of people through the team work Enhancing Presentation Skills Reading and analyzing published research papers
Faculty Professional instructors Latest knowledge
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Program Out of the 15 courses I studied, I recall at least 5 courses that were a complete waste of time because of the extremely poor quality and ability of the instructors.
Grading System, Research & Faculty The high dependency of the course grading on group work versus actual studying and research Research
weakness Some of the professors were not qualified enough to teach
Master of Global Affairs
STRENGTHS (1)
Academic Experience The constant help available The Courses The lectures
WEAKNESSES (1)
None None that is very obvious
Master of Public Policy & Adm.
STRENGTHS (2)
Other Everything
Skills: Reading & Writing Reading and writing skills
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Program unavailability of the adviser and prejudging the quality of student performance.
Administration Issues Some routine work of papers.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2)
Diversity Please don't limit the availability of master degree to staff members in one program.
None Thanks!
Masters in Public Administration
STRENGTHS (5)
Academic Experience Courses, quality of professors, being up to date with global and local news and policy issues Availability for funds and scholarships for graduate students
Faculty communication with professors
Faculty exposed to well educated and high calibers faculty
Learning Experience Diversity, professional and personal development opportunities, reputable organization to have a graduate degree from.
Learning Experience The exposure to a such diversified community from peers to AUC qualified staff, as well to well articulated curricula. The experience has with no doubt strengthen several skill such as public speaking skills, presentation, and research methodology.
WEAKNESSES (4)
Academic Experience I had better expectations for the learning/academic experience.
Academic Program lack of courses
Academic Program Diversity of courses and available information
Schedule SCHEDULES SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATCH THE NEEDS
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (6)
Academic Program adding modern and new courses
Academic Program The public administration program needs to be restructured in a way that is consistent with a particular vision for its graduates. For example, If you want to graduate professionals and practitioners in the fields of public administration and development, then you must structure the courses and the professors you select around that objective. Some of the professors have very good academic experience with little professional and practical experience, and they keep teaching courses that are practical in nature.
None Thanks for the enriching experience i had in your university.
Research It would be useful to stress on enhancing research methodology tools and skills. As for the public policy and administration department, there is a necessity to take more into consideration the egyptian setting and it is vital to propose more practicum courses.
Schedule more classes at 5:00 p.m.
Masters International and Comparative Law
STRENGTHS (1)
Research To some extent enhancement in the research skills
WEAKNESSES (1)
Faculty Very complicated law professors
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Faculty Change law department professors
Mechanical Engineering
STRENGTHS (2)
Academic Experience Academic writing, research excellence, and high quality publications
Research I have learned to collect data and work on a research
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Program Not focused enough on a certain topic
Academic Program Unavailability of some graduate courses
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Academic Program The masters program needs to be more focused in my department not just a collection of courses like an undergraduate
Middle East Studies
STRENGTHS (1)
Faculty My interaction with some professors who truly motovated me to fulfill my potential
WEAKNESSES (1)
Faculty Some professors who did not succeed in inspiring students
Migration and Refugee Studies
STRENGTHS (1)
Faculty The richness of knowledge my professors contributed in every class
Nanotechnology
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Administration Issues Costs of Graduates studies are becoming extremely expensive.
PhD in Applied Science
STRENGTHS (1)
Financial Assistance & Research Being granted conference grants to be exposed to the research community worldwide.
WEAKNESSES (1)
Student Engagement No team work in our research since we are very few and each one is working in a separate field with a professor. Professors do not cooperate in joint research work that enable their students to work jointly.
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Facilities: Labs Computer Science major needs more test bed labs to facilitate practical experiments for graduate research. AsPhD students, we need more variations of courses to select from. Each semester we had to submit a petition to open a new course since we have already taken all the Masters courses.
PhD in Engineering
STRENGTHS (1)
Learning Experience 1- Academic experience; 2- Practical experience; 3- Research methods experience; 4- Writing well-performed papers ; 5- Learning a lot of software programs; 6- Working well in team work.
Political Science
STRENGTHS (1)
Academic Experience Decent quality of education capitalizing on well-established and strong faculty members from around the world, while maintaining the culture of the region.
WEAKNESSES (1)
Support Services: Academic advising Academic advising should be more emphasized.
Robotics, Contrl & Smart Syst
STRENGTHS (2)
Research Research skills
Skills: Research & Presentation enhanced my ability to conduct research enhanced my presentation skills better team working the ability to present ideas and research results
WEAKNESSES (2)
Other Time management
Research very little exposure to industry support for research and thesis writing not available from very early
Sociology Anthropology
STRENGTHS (1)
Learning Experience AUC has provided a unique academic sphere in which one were able to know, to question, to learn, and to be a knowledge seeker.
WEAKNESSES (1)
None NA
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
None Thank you
Sustainable Development
STRENGTHS (1)
Academic Program the program is unique and the first of its kind " Sustainable development". the best 2 courses I took were basic concepts and applications for social and environmental policies: by Aisha Saad Cities structures and dynamics: Mona Abaza
WEAKNESSES (1)
Faculty not all the professors are good enough
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (1)
Faculty need more incentives to attract a diverse range of professors from abroad to enrich the range of knowledge
Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language
STRENGTHS (1)
Learning Experience being updated with the latest trends in the field. Opportunities to teach abroad through related emailing lists. Encouragement by professors for further development
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language
STRENGTHS (2)
Faculty & Students I enjoyed working and studying with a group of talented and caring colleagues, most of whom were different from me in many ways, but we all got along really well and respected each other's opinions and tastes. It was also an honor to take classes led by experts in their respective fields - Dr. Plumlee has been especially inspirational to me.
Skills: Presentation & Facilities: Library _Enhancing presentation and communication skills through course presentations _E-library was time saving and user-friendly, especially for people who work full time and cannot be physically present at the university for long hours. _Availability of readers and supervisors for thesis writers.
WEAKNESSES (2)
Academic Program _ Unavailability of some courses (were not offered for 6 successive semesters) although they were in the catalog (i.e.; curriculum design). _Very limited summer course offerings (only one course was offered and there were not any summer offerings in summer, 2016). _ Unavailability of exchange programs with other universities outside Egypt especially in the US, which could have added to the value and richness of the program. Other departments for example have exchange programs with UCLA and University of Texas.
Academic Program I do wish that more general Applied Linguistics courses were offered, but perhaps because the department size is so small, it is not possible to offer more at the moment. As I mentioned earlier in the survey, I have much more of an interest in research-related work (either more general non-pedagogy language-research or ESL research) rather than an interest in teaching in the classroom. I wish that more courses in the MA TESOL program could be offered for those who prefer behind-the-scenes research and development. It would also be helpful to learn more about how to bridge theory and practice, when certain individuals are more comfortable with the former and others with the latter (i.e. looking beyond the single teacher-researcher in the classroom, to how researchers/agencies work with practitioners/academic institutions).
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT (2)
Academic Program _Providing a PHD and an MA degree in linguistics, since the university has a department of applied linguistics.
Academic Program Some possible courses for consideration in the future: Linguistics: - Phonetics and Phonemics - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Psycholinguistics Language and Culture: - Ethnography - Culture and Literacy Pedagogical Theory and Development: - Historical Foundations of Language Pedagogies - Curriculum Development - ESL Materials Development
PART VI: TRENDS
OVERALL STUDENT SATISFACTION
79.50%
90.50%
83.50%
92.40%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
Overall Satisfaction with the Graduate Experience
56.70%
71.30%
51.30% 51.40%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
I would definitely recommend AUC to my friends considering my field of study
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
INTENTION TO PURSUE A PHD
68.50%
58.70%
53.04%
54.50%
70.20%
12.00%
12.70%
13.04%
9.90%
14.90%
15.70%
21.40%
21.74%
26.40%
11.70%
3.70%
7.10%
12.17%
9.10%
3.20%
Fall 2016
Spring 2016
Fall 2015
Spring 2015
Fall 2014
Students' Employment Status Trend
Employed full time Employed part time Seeking employment Unemployed
38.60%
49.40%55.80% 53.80%
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
Percentage of Respondents Intending to Pursue Graduate Studies