graduation survey 1998 and 2001. process for questionnaire development

55
Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001

Upload: neil-park

Post on 26-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001

Page 2: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Process for Questionnaire Development

Page 3: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Rational for Third Year Graduate

Would still be in college Send mailing to parents address Send mailing over spring break

Page 4: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Rational for One Year Graduate

Future base group data Send mailing to parents address Send over spring break

Page 5: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Questionnaire: Based upon how I respond to surveys.

Wanted it to fit on a post card Wanted a quick and easy instrument for

higher return rate Postcards were pre-stamped

Page 6: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Questions for Survey

Asked Mick and Al for suggestions Surveyed high school staff for suggestions No one seemed to know exactly what information

was wanted Uncertainty on who/how information would be used Therefore, Questions were broad and open ended CLEP and activities questions were from staff

Page 7: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Questionnaire

Page 8: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Return Rates:

1998 Graduates: mailed 185 surveys,

41 returned----22% return rate

2001 Graduates: mailed 194 surveys,

78 returned---40% return rate

31 returned with address unknown

Page 9: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

1998 Results

Page 10: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

1998— 41 out of 185------22% response

25 attending 4 year college/university 2 attending 2 year college transfer program 4 attending vocational school 3 enlisted in military 8 are working full time

Page 11: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Colleges:

Page 12: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Iowa Regent Institutions:

4---Iowa State University

3---The University of Iowa

1---The University of Iowa, Dental College

4---University of Northern Iowa

Page 13: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Iowa 4 year Private Colleges

Drake Iowa Wesleyan College 2--Mount Mercy

Page 14: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Out of state 4 year College/Universities

Eckerd College MNU Northwestern University Smith College UNCW

U. of South Dakota UNLV U. of Minnesota Winona State

Page 15: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Transfer to 4 year College

All attending Kirkwood—transferring to:

The University of Iowa University of Northern Iowa

Page 16: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Vocational Colleges

Aveda Institute Mercy Radiology Kirkwood Community College

Page 17: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Military

3—Navy

Page 18: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Work

Accounting Mercy Medical Center Sattler Homes Day Care

ACT Reinhart Foods NCS Nursing Home

Page 19: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

School Activities

40--More than 1 activity 12—Athletics 6—Music 5—Clubs 1--Speech

Page 20: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Strength Categories

Instructional Courses Other

Page 21: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Instructional

12—Good teachers Industrial tech program Personal help from teachers

Page 22: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Courses

8—PSEO Class choices Diversity of curriculum Integrated math

Page 23: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Other

Work ethic Size of school Portfolio School to Work

program Activities

Newspaper Facilities Technology Athletics

Page 24: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Limitation Categories

Instructional Courses Other

Page 25: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Instructional

No comments

Page 26: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Courses

Integrated math Lack of AP courses Need more course selection Need computer classes, not just keyboarding

Page 27: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Other

Raise credits for graduation

Need more art supplies Crowding Ethnic diversity

College information/ financial aid

No swimming pool Four Oaks

Page 28: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

2001 Results78 responses out of 194—40% return

39--Attending 4 year college/university 18—Transfer college program 12—Vocational program 4—Military 5—Working

Page 29: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Colleges

Page 30: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Iowa Regent Institutions

4—Iowa State University 5—The University of Iowa 8—University of Northern Iowa

Page 31: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Iowa 4 year Private Colleges

Drake Loras Luther

7--Mt. Mercy St. Ambrose Warburg

Page 32: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Out of State Colleges/Universities

Arizona State U. JIMC Northwestern University U. of Nebraska—

Omaha

U. of Rochester Wayne State U. Eastern Kentucky U. Wisconsin Lutheran

College

Page 33: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Transfer programs

17 at Kirkwood Community College – 8 to Iowa Regent Institutions – 9 are undecided

Page 34: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Vocational Colleges

Kirkwood CC Capri Paradise Valley CC Interior Design

Culinary Arts 2—Cosmotology Automotive Tech Physical Therapy Ass’t

Page 35: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Military

2—Iowa National Guard 2—United States Air Force

Page 36: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Work

Cedar Rapids Golf Course Lakeside Plumbing RM Boggs Stay at home mom

Page 37: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

School Activities

19—More than 1 activity 15—Athletics 2—Music 1--Speech

Page 38: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Strength Categories

Instructional Courses Other

Page 39: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Instructional

24—Instructors Teamwork Band/music

Page 40: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Courses

English department Library Special educaiton 7—PSEO 8—Technology College prep coursework

Page 41: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Other

Open campus Number of activities Involved parents 5—Portfolio

Communication with parents

Facilities Athletics/activities Block days

Page 42: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Limitation categories

Instructional Courses Other

Page 43: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Instructional

None listed

Page 44: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Courses

Need more variety Not enough emphasis on

core classes 9-10 English Need AP courses Need AP weighted GPA 10—Pushed into integrated

math Math program Guidance—what’s available

to students

Student involvement in community

Parking 3--Don’t value kids Senior presentation No swimming pool Tension between students Lack of diversity

Page 45: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Conclusions

Better % return than expected from mailings

Teachers are highly respected and appreciated at PHS

Overall, students and parents are happy and appreciative of their educational experiences

Several concerns have been resolved with the new building and the on going improvement of the curriculum

No real interest in CLEP—possibly because they don’t have information about the option

Page 46: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Suggested changes for next survey

Page 47: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Post Card

If used: Need better way to obtain updated

addresses Reassess the questions Confusion on “Year of graduation” Phrasing for “attending 2 year college” Confusion with “Employment, part time” for

college student

Page 48: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Most Importantly

Need greater input as to who will be using this data and how. This will then effect the questions to be asked.

Page 49: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development
Page 50: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development
Page 51: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development
Page 52: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development
Page 53: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development
Page 54: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development

Questionnaire

Page 55: Graduation Survey 1998 and 2001. Process for Questionnaire Development