green audit report - payyanur college · bhoomithrasena, forestry club, campus beautification...
TRANSCRIPT
1
GREEN AUDIT REPORT
BRIEF REPORT OF A JOINT EFFORT BY
THE DEPARTMENTS OF ZOOLOGY, BOTANY AND PHYSICS
PAYYANUR COLLEGE, PAYYANUR
DECEMBER 2017
2
CONTENTS
Page No.
1. THE TEAM 3
2. INTRODUCTION 4
3. OBJECTIVES 4
4. STUDY METHODS 4
5. RESULTS 5
A. CAMPUS WEALTH AND HEALTH
AREA AND HABITATS 5
FAUNA 8
FLORA 12
SOIL QUALITY 17
WATER QUALITY 19
B. WASTE MANAGEMENT 22
FOOD WASTE 22
PLASTIC WASTES: 22
E – WASTE 23
C. ENERGY AUDIT 24
SOLAR POWER GENERATION SYSTEM: 25
ROOF-TOP RAIN-WATER HARVESTING 26
BIOGAS 26
CARBON FOOT PRINT 26
6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE THRUSTS 28
ANNEXURES (AS SEPARATE REPORTS)
1. REPORT ON GREEN INITIATIVES IN THE CAMPUS (Activities by Biodiversity club,
Bhoomithrasena, Forestry club, Campus beautification committee, Zoological Club, Botany
Club, Birds club, NSS, NCC etc)
2. REPORT OF FAUNAL STUDIES
3. REPORT ON TREES OF THE CAMPUS
4. ENERGY AUDIT REPORT
5. E - Waste Report
3
THE TEAM
Staff and students, Departments of Zoology, Botany and Physics
Coordinator : Dr. P R Swaran, Dept of Zoology
Members : Dr. E Harikrishnan, Dept of Botany
Preethi Rajan M K, Dept of Physics
Dr. Ratheesh Narayanan, Dept of Botany
Vinodkumar T, Dept. of Physics
Suresh S (Dept of Geography, Kannur University Campus)
Student members : Vysakh M K, III BSc Zoology
Jithina Narayanan, III BSc Zoology
Chaithra M, III BSc Zoology
Jyothi K, III BSc Zoology
Saranya KV, III BSc Zoology
Shilpa K, III BSc Zoology
Students involved in tree survey
: Amrutha K, Anjali Viswanath, Anjusha K P, Anusree K,
Reshma C, Athira John, Athira Unnikrishnan, Salabha N,
Sanjana Suresh, Shafeena N M, Shijina C V, Sneha, Yamini S
(III BSc Botany)
Students involved in e waste survey
: Athira Ravendran K and Fathimath Sahala K (III BSC Physics)
Students involved in energy audit
: Athira Varma and Haritha PK (III BSc Physics)
Students involved in faunal survey
: Meera Ravi, Roshni PK and Sanjana S (III BSc Zoology)
4
INTRODUCTION
Learning about ourselves should be our foremost concern, especially being a higher
Education institution. Our approach to nature is definitely the basic fact that defines our
future and our very existence. So a self inquiry on the environmental quality of our campus
was attempted to realize how green is our campus and how sustainable are our approaches.
Apart from understanding the issues and planning of measures to solve them, it is an
educational process too, as students from various departments of the college got involved
in the process of audit.
OBJECTIVES :
A comprehensive analysis to determine how green is the campus and our activities with
main focus on the following aspects.
1. Land use pattern – area of the campus under different ecological zones and its
transformation over the last five years.
2. Flora – the plant wealth of the campus
3. Fauna – the animal wealth of the campus
4. Soil quality of different zones
5. Water quality at source and supply
6. Waste – sources and management
7. Energy use
8. Vehicle use
9. Identifying future preferences
STUDY METHODS :
1. Area: GIS maps of the campus, demarcated into different zones based on ground analysis
and the area under each zone is found using software.
2. Flora: Plants were recorded by manual survey. Quantification in different zones is also
attempted.
5
3. Fauna: Survey for larger animals. Sampling for soil animals. Quantification attempted for
soil organisms in different zones.
4. Soil: Samples collected from different zones, and tested at District soil testing lab,
Karimbam.
5. Water: Water samples from the source (Open Well) and taps were analysed at Water
Testing Lab, Kannur.
6. Waste management: The amount of waste produced and the current practices of
management are analysed. Amount of e-waste in the campus obtained through survey.
7. Energy audit: energy consumption was obtained from electricity bills. Energy
requirement of all electronic and electrical equipments in the college was obtained
through survey. The light requirements and the methods of reducing consumption
through measures like LED were analysed. Biogas and its issues were also analysed.
8. Vehicle use : the mode of conveyance used by students and staff of the college were
recorded by oral survey in all the classes for students and personal interview for staff.
9. Green initiatives: There are a handful of clubs and organisations within the campus that
contribute to green initiatives. A report of their activities was made.
10. Towards future: The issues related to environment, which were identified during the
study and can be solved in future are found out and listed in this last section based on
the data obtained in the relevant sections.
RESULTS
A. CAMPUS WEALTH AND HEALTH
Payyanur college is situated in North Kerala, about 40 km from Kannur, the district head
quarters. The campus spans to about 104 acres of land (one of the few colleges with largest
area in Kerala). The whole land was donated by the natives to start the college, and the
agreement is that the land can never be sold, but used or donated free of cost, only for
purposes related to education. It is on this ground that the college campus has generously
donated land for the establishment of two university campuses (Kannur and Sanskrit),
Kendriya Vidyalaya and PES Vidyalaya.
6
1. AREA AND HABITATS
The area is laterite hilly type with grasslands and acacia as the major vegetation. The area at
present can be divided into 7 zones as in table. The area was mapped using GIS, and
compared with data of five years back. The table below shows the change in area in
different zones during the last 5 years.
Sl
no
Zone 2012 2017 Difference (m2)
Area
(m2)
Area (%) Area
(m2)
Area (%) (m2) (%)
1 Barren land
(courtyard, rocky
area barren)
50461 22 59199 26 + 8738 + 17
2 Buildings 11698 5 12078 6 + 380 - 3
3 Exotic trees
(acacia/casuarinas)
78864 35 64344 28 -14520 +18
4 Grassland 60889 28 60939 27 +50 -
5 Ground 4977 2 10212 5 +5235 +105
6 Mixed vegetation 16684 8 16460 7 -224 1.3
7 Water body - - 341 1 +341 100
Total 223573 100 223573 100 0
The area under barren land include areas like courtyards of buildings and rocky areas. The
increase in barren area by 17 percent is mainly due to the construction of new building (its
courtyard) and the soil dumped area. The area mostly cleared for the new building was
acacia plantation, and some area under acacia was replaced with native vegetation. The
ground area was almost doubled by clearing acacia.
7
Campus map 2012
Campus map 2017
8
2. FAUNA
Payyanur College has a large campus area of around 100 acres that include different
habitats – natural as well as altered systems. It is originally a typical midland laterite hillock
with high ecological significance comparable with Madayippara. So understanding the
biological wealth of the system is very important at least to understand what we lose by
different activities like building, ground etc, and take up adequate conservation methods.
Animal species recorded in the studies already done in recent years were compiled from
project reports of BSc students (table 1)
Table 1. Animal species recorded from the campus over the last 5 years
SL. NO. GROUPS
NO. OF
SPECIES
17 Centipede 1
18 Diplura 1
19 Earwig 1
20 Fly 5
21 Homoptera 3
22 Isopods 2
23 Lepisma 1
24 Millepede 2
25 Mite 1
26 Pseudoscorpion 1
27 Springtail 4
28 Thrips 1
Total 248
SL. NO. GROUPS
NO. OF
SPECIES
vertebrates
1 Mammals 10
2 Birds 29
3 Reptiles 14
4 Amphibians 5
Invertebrates
5 Annelids 4
6 Molluscs 5
7 Beetles 15
8 Grasshopper 10
9 Hymenoptera 36
10 Isoptera 13
11 Lepidopterans 43
12 Dragonflies 10
13 Spider 19
14 Cricket 8
15 Blattidae 2
9
For the present analysis, soil fauna were selected for detailed study. Soil organisms play a
vital role in determining many soil characteristics. By their activities, they improve the soil
chemically, physically and biologically and thereby create an ideal situation for the plants to
grow. Soil organisms, being highly sensitive to environmental changes are among the
ecological indicators that indicates the health of a system. So by studying them we can
understand how healthy our campus is.
Methods of study
College campus is a heterogeneous area with both natural and altered habitats. Two types
of distinct habitats each were selected from this for the study as follows.
NATURAL
i) Grassland
ii) Shady scrub jungle
ALTERED
i) Herbal garden
ii) Acacia plantation
Organisms are collected through three techniques (Macfadyen, 1953)
Pitfall trap
Hand sorting
Berlese funnel
Pitfall trap Burlese funnel
10
The diversity indices were calculated online using biodiversity calculator at
https://www.alyoung.com/labs/biodiversity_calculator.html.
Results:
Table 2 shows the overall diversity in nutshell and Table 3 shows the dominant group of
organisms in terms of number of individuals. A total of 860 organisms were collected
belonging to 96 species. The diversity index values are high. For example the Shannon value
ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 usually, and here the overall diversity is close to the highest value
(3.346). likewise Simpson index ranges from 0 to 1 and the minimum value indicates
maximum diversity. Here the overall Simpson value is just 0.063.
Table 2. Overall diversity of soil organisms in the campus
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Herbalgarden
Acacia Grassland Shadyjungle
No. of orgnsm
No. of sp.
HABITAT No. of organisms No. of species Shannon-
Weiner index
Simpson index
Herbal garden 222 39 2.786 0.09327
Acacia 162 38 2.911 0.08312
Grassland 279 35 2.489 0.1412
Shady jungle 201 27 2.348 0.1567
Total
(Campus
diversity)
860 96 3.346 0.06334
11
It is interesting to note that Acacia has the highest value for Shannon index and lowest value
for simpson index (highest diversity). However, close examination of the data shows that
majority of the species belongs to two major groups – ants (16 species) and spiders
(8species). Both of them are actually surface/litter organisms and not true soil species.
Acacia is almost like a naturalized system in the campus, with many years of existence. The
shade it provides, together with least soil alterations and thick litter layer must be providing
adequate habitat for some organisms.
The lowest value for diversity indices – lowest Shannon and highest Simpson – was obtained
for Shady area. This is probably due to the continuous human interaction and dumping and
burning of waste materials in the area.
Table 3. Number of different group of organisms (individuals, not species) collected from
four different habitats (dominant groups are given in bold letters)
Habitat Herbal garden Acacia Grassland Shady jungle
Earthworm 2 0 0 0
Mites 10 1 78 1
Spider 6 15 2 2
Pseudoscorpion 2 2 0 0
Centipede 5 1 1 18
Millipede 2 1 1 0
Woodlouse 45 18 4 11
Lepisma 2 1 0 0
Springtail 33 18 39 55
Campodeids 1 1 0 0
Cricket 3 1 5 3
Earwig 1 0 4 0
Termite 18 34 52 1
Thrips 1 1 2 0
Bugs 2 0 0 0
Beetle 18 3 2 10
Ants 69 60 77 83
12
Wasp 0 1 2 0
Fly 2 1 8 4
Gastropod 0 3 0 8
Conclusions
The college campus has rich overall diversity of soil organisms that indicates its ecological
importance.
Any alterations in these habitats, should ensure minimum damage to this rich diversity.
Large area in the campus is already altered for ground and buildings.
Acacia, though an exotic, is almost naturalized in the campus. It is evident by the highest
diversity values. Further in depth analysis on the type of organisms and their role in the soil
is needed for concrete conclusions.
The record of lowest diversity values in the most disturbed area (human interaction and
pollution) highlights the need for immediate steps to conserve the area.
The study has limitations of time and space. Over the year collection in more areas would
give more concrete results. Also detailed study of specific groups like ants, spiders etc in
different habitats would give more clear information on the variation in their diversity.
2. FLORA
The plants of the campus so far recorded from different studies were documented and
given below in section A. A detailed study on the trees present in the campus, their number
and specialities were analysed and given in section B.
Section A. plants of college campus already recorded
Payyanur College Campus, Kunhimangalam Grama Panchayath, Kannur District is a midland
hills and are characterized by lateritic plateaus and scrub jungles. Lateritic rocky surfaces,
grasslands and scrub jungles of these hills are rich and diverse habitats of vast varieties of
flora and fauna. The floral diversity is very rich with different species of shrubs, herbs,
climbers, creepers and trees that are growing at the rocky surfaces and in the slopes of hills.
13
The alternation of very wet and dry conditions creates an unusual ecological situation that
supports a unique flora. The vegetation of the area can be grouped mainly into grasslands,
and scrub jungles. The vegetation of grasslands can again be categorized into wet and dry
phases based on the season. These grasslands are rich with many species of seasonal
herbaceous plants and grasses. The scrub jungles are with various shrubs and climbers.
The floristic study in Payyanur College campus conducted by Department of Botany with
Biodiversity Club Members resulted in the collection, identification and description of 370
taxa of flowering plants. Among these plant 183 species are herbs, 74 are shrubs, 63 are
climbers including lianas and 40 species are trees. The magnitude of the species diversity is
clear when it compared with that of other regional Floras of Kerala. Many of the top families
of Western Ghats are well represented in Edanadan hills also. Fabaceae with 44 species is
the largest Angiosperm family followed by Poaceae with 32 species.
SL.
NO. FAMILY
NO. OF
SPECIES
1 Amaranthaceae 10
2 Anacardiaceae 2
3 Annonaceae 2
4 Apiaceae 2
5 Apocynaceae 6
6 Araceae 3
7 Aristolochaceae 1
8 Asclepiadaceae 5
9 Balsaminaceae 1
10 Caesalpiniaceae 8
11 Cannabaceae 1
12 Capparidaceae 5
13 Cariophyllaceae 1
14 Commelinaceae 3
15 Cucurbitaceae 5
16 Dioscoreaceae 4
14
17 Dipterocarpaceae 1
18 Droceraceae 1
19 Euphorbiaceae 22
20 Fabaceae 48
21 Flacourtiaceae 1
22 Gentianacea 4
23 Gesneriaceae 1
24 Hypocrataceae 1
25 Hypoxidaceae 1
26 Lamiaceae 9
27 Lauraceae 2
28 Leccythidaceae 1
29 Leeaceae 1
30 Lentibulariaceae 2
31 Liliaceae 3
32 Lynaceae 1
33 Lythraceae 1
34 Malpighiaceae 1
35 Malvaceae 11
36 Melastomataceae 4
37 Meliaceae 2
38 Menispermaceae 5
39 Mimosaceae 7
40 Moraceae 5
15
Section B. detailed exploration on tree species of the campus:
The study was done to document the number, types and specialities of the tree species of
campus, except for the trees planted under special projects like Johncyvanam, herbal
garden, RET etc. So the aim was to document the unprotected tree species, to ensure
protection in future.
27 species of trees are present in the Payyanur College Campus. The number of plants in
each species and average diameter are given in Table 1. The whole campus except the
places of conserved plantations of Botany department was taken for the survey. For
considering as a tree an approximate height of 5m is considered; also excluded some shrubs
(Canthium sp,) and Bamboos with a height of more than 5m. For taking the number of tree
plants only those with a height of 5 m. are considered. The diameter was measured 5 c.m.
above the ground level. The leaves are collected and photographed. The photo of the bark is
taken from a height of 1.5 m. of the tree trunk. The colour, structure and ornamentation
patterns in the bark are noticed. Observations were summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 1.Number and average diameter of trees present in Payyanur College Campus
Sl. No Name of the tree No of plants in
Payyanur campus
Average
Diameter
in cm
1 Acacia auriculiformis 128 85.2
2 Acacia mangium 2 132.35
3 Alstonia scolaris 2 129.4
4 Anacardium occidentale 10 147.6
5 Artocarpus heterophyllus 5 86
6 Caryota urens 3 144.5
7 Cassia fistula 4 125.8
8 Cassia siamea 5 99.9
9 Casuarina equisetifolia 15 163.7
10 Cocos nucifera 8 95
11 Delonix regia 6 146
12 Erythrina indica 2 56
16
13 Ficus benghalensis 3 475
14 Ficus religiosa 5 220
15 Hopea ponga 5 105.3
16 Lagerstroemia indica 8 80.3
17 Macaranga peltata 20 116.3
18 Mangifera indica 20 181
19 Phyllanthus emblica 10 139.4
20 Plumeria alba 2 32.4
21 Pongamia pinnata 2 96
22 Strychnos nux-vomica 2 98
23 Swietenia mahagoni 24 136.4
24 Syzygium cumini 4 163.5
25 Tamarindus indica 4 132.3
26 Tectona grandis 12 134.1
27 Trema orientalis 20 81.6
Eight sp. are deciduous trees while the others are evergreen. 15 spp. of the trees have
simple leaf where as 11 spp. have compound leaf. Phyllodes are present in Acacia where as
cladode is present in Casuarina. Large leaves are present in the case of palms- coconut and
fish tail palms. Small leaves are present in the case of Tamarindus and Phyllanthus. The
largest leaf bearing dicots are Tectona and Macaranga.
Observations on the bark are given in the Table 3; but for the classification morphological
and anatomical studies are to be carried out in future. The leaf and bark morphology can be
used for the taxonomic key preparation which will help a common man to identify the tree
species around him.
Based on the Nativity, eighteen plants are Asian, native to America are two, native to Africa
are five and there were four Australian plants and two of the trees have a worldwide
distribution (Casuarina and Trema). The study of distribution pattern of the plants may give
the history of human invasion and plant evolution along with other associated organism
evolution. The phytosociological changes attributed to the introduction of a nonnative plant
is not addressed so far.
17
All the plants were useful in one way or another; so the deeper and wider studies are to be
carried out for the future prospectus and conservation. Plants endemic to India are found to
have a lesser phytochemical details as in the case of Hopea ponga.
SOIL QUALITY
Soil samples were collected from the four study habitats and dried by spreading on a plain
sheet of paper under room temperature. The soil samples were then packed air tight and
was sent for analysis to District Soil testing lab, Karimbam, Taliparamba. Major parameters
analysed were the soil PH, dissolved minerals, organic carbon (%), Phosphorus (kg/ha) and
Potassium (kg/ha).
The result of the soil analysis is given in table 1. It’s possible relation with faunal elements is
discussed in the respective heads.
Table 1. Result of soil test
Sl.no Spots PH Dissolved
Mineral
Organic
carbon(%)
Phosphorus
(kg/ha)
Potassium
(kg/ha)
1 Herbal garden 6.1 <0.40
Moderate
1.95
High
15.68
Medium
183.68
Medium
2 Acacia 5.13 <0.40
Moderate
2.30
High
12.54
Medium
170.24
Medium
3 Grassland 5.2 <0.40
Moderate
2.05
High
12.99
Medium
156.80
Medium
4 Shady Jungle 5.1 <0.40
Moderate
2.31
High
16.57
Medium
268.8
Medium
Herbal garden
It is an artificial plantation of herbs, shrubs and trees. The daily irrigation and use of
biofertilizer (cow dung) is a unique property of this habitat. So the moisture content along
with manures influence the vegetation and fauna composition. It is generally a shady area
18
due to presence of leafy trees and shrubs. The pH of the soil is moderate (6.1), may be due
to the application of cow dung. Dissolved mineral content is also moderate (<0.40). High
organic carbon content (1.95%), moderate potassium (183.68kg/ha) and phosphorous
(15.68kg/ha) are other peculiarities.
Acacia
The area is dominated by the exotic Acacia auriculiformis trees and saplings. Acacia
mangium and Casuarina are the other exotics in the campus, but they do not form a
continuous stretch. Acacia are known to have allelopathic characters, that may negatively
influence the soil fauna both directly and indirectly. The soil do not receive direct sunlight
and the area is almost naturalized due to many years of existence. pH of the soil is
comparatively low (5.13) which indicates the acidic nature. The organic carbon content is
2.3% (high) . The other constituents of soil such as dissolved minerals (>0.40),
phosphorus(12.54kg/ha) and potassium(170.24kg/ha) are present in moderate amount.
Grassland
Grasslands are areas where the vegetation is dominated by grasses. Grasses like
Andropogon, Arundinella, Agarostus, Ischaemum etc are found abundantly. Grassland has
sparse trees. The grasses in this zone are mixed with herbs like crotalaria, leucas, ixora etc.
This place receives direct sunlight. It forms the feeding land of grazing animals like cow, goat
etc. pH is relatively low with the value of 5.1, that mark the land as acidic. Organic carbon
content is high with 2.05%. Phosphorus is present at an amount of 12.99kg/ha (medium).
156.8kg/ha (medium) of potassium is also present in the grassland.
Shady jungle
The area is dominated by lianas and a few trees like tamarind, and cashew which forms a
shady habitat. So the sunlight does not reach there directly. The temperature does not vary
as open land. So it promotes the growth of algae, fungus ,etc and it encourages nutrient
cycling. So the organic content is very much. In this habitat human interaction is relatively
high. It is the dumping site of concrete waste and other wastes. It is a dry rocky area. Leaf
litter ,compost materials, rotting wood all makes suitable habitats for organisms. The soil
19
test result shows low pH (5.1), moderate dissolved mineral content (<0.40), high organic
carbon content (2.31%), moderate potassium (268.8kg/ha) and phosphorus (16.57kg/ha).
3. WATER QUALITY
Entire water requirements of the campus are met from a single open well. It is collected in a
concrete tank and distributed to various places in the campus. Two water samples were
taken for analysis – one directly from the well and the other from the tap at most distance
away from the tank (from the tap at herbal garden near Botany department). The samples
were collected as per the protocol and got analysed from the water testing laboratory of
Kerala Water Authority, Kannur.
Sample: Open well(W1)
Sl no Characteristics Unit Desirable
limit as per IS
10500:2012
Permissible
limits
Actual contents
Sampling point
1
1 Turbidity(NTU) NTU 1 5 0.4
2 pH 6.5-8.5 No
relaxation
4.8
3 Electrical conductivity µs/cm 37.4
4 Temperature ˚C 28.4
5 Acidity Mg/litre 16.0
6 Alkalinity Mg/litre 200 600 12.0
7 Total hardness
as(CaCO3)
Mg/litre 200 600 14.0
8 Calcium(Ca) Mg/litre 75 200 3.21
9 Magnesium(Mg) Mg/litre 30 100 1.46
10 Chloride (as Cl) Mg/litre 250 1000 12.76
11 Iron (as Fe) Mg/litre 0.3 1.0 Nil
12 Nitrate (as NO3) Mg/litre 45 No
relaxation
Nil
20
13 Phosphate (as PO4) Mg/litre Nil
14 Ammonia Mg/litre 0.5 No
relaxation
Nil
REMARKS: Very low pH.
BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Sl.no source MPN of coliforms in 100 ml MPN of E.Coli
1
Open well(W1) nil Nil
Sample :Tap water (W2)
Sl no Characteristics Unit Desirable
limit as per
IS
10500:2012
Permissible
limits
Actual
contents
Sampling point
1
1 Turbidity(NTU) NTU 1 5 Nil
2 pH 6.5-8.5 No relaxation 5.2
3 Electrical conductivity µs/cm 38.9
4 Temperature ˚C 27.9
5 Acidity Mg/litre 12.0
6 Alkalinity Mg/litre 200 600 10.0
7 Total hardness
as(CaCO3)
Mg/litre 200 600 12.0
8 Calcium(Ca) Mg/litre 75 200 2.4
9 Magnesium(Mg) Mg/litre 30 100 1.46
10 Chloride (as Cl) Mg/litre 250 1000 38.29
11 Iron (as Fe) Mg/litre 0.3 1.0 Nil
12 Nitrate (as NO3) Mg/litre 45 No relaxation Nil
13 Phosphate (as PO4) Mg/litre Nil
14 Ammonia Mg/litre 0.5 No relaxation Nil
21
REMARKS: Very low pH.
BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Sl.no source MPN of coliforms in 100 ml MPN of E.Coli
1
Tap water (W2) 7 Nil
REMARKS : Bacteria detected.
In both sample 1and 2, the turbidity is below the permissible level. The turbidity is due to
the presence of particles suspended or that dissolved in water that scatter light. It makes
water appear cloudy or murky. Less turbidity in sample is due to less amount of Calcium,
Magnesium, Chloride, Iron, Nitrate, Phosphate and Ammonia. Most of the elements are
absent in the sample.The absence of iron in water sample marks a serious deficit of mineral
content.
The less turbidity of water is due to less mineral content. Thereby it may lead to
malnutrition in animals.
Acidity, alkalinity and hardness of water are also below the desirable limit. The pH of both
samples is less than 7, ie, acidic.The lower pH levels increase the risk of mobilized toxic
metals that can be absorbed, even by humans. Calcium and magnesium dissolved in water
are most common minerals that make water hard. Since this dissolved Ca &Mg content are
less, water shows less hardness .according to the standard of US department of interior and
the water quality association both of the sample contain soft water (0-17mg /l).
Soft water is less abrasive in nature. . Even though it can be used for cleaning purpose it is
very susceptible to pH fluctuation which can happen with even smallest addictives like fish
wastes.
Bacteriological analysis is inevitable in water quality assessment. Sample 1 contains no
coliform bacteria but 7 coliform bacteria were detected in sample 2. Absence of E Coli in
collected samples indicates the water is free from faecal contamination.
22
B. WASTE MANAGEMENT
1. FOOD WASTE
Food waste is generated and managed at four points as follows
1. Washing area behind western block - there is a composting unit set up here by the NSS
which converts the food waste into compost. It is a scientific system purchased from
RAIDCO, Govt. of Kerala, and it functions well with solid food waste. an initial mixture of
cowdung and dry leaves along with addition of bacterial solution at weekly intervals ensures
proper functioning of the system. There is a pit near the unit where the wastes like paper,
plantain leaves etc which are used to bring food are deposited.
2. Washing area beside life science block: a similar composting unit is set up as mentioned
above. The food waste is collected in buckets
3. Girls hostel : there is a biogas unit which converts the food wastes into biogas, which is
used for cooking in the hostel canteen
4. Canteen : a biogas unit is set up here too which converts food waste and other kitchen
wastes into biogas and used for cooking
Altogether, the quantity of food waste produced is comparatively low. More than 95% of
the students are day-scholars and majority of them bring food in boxes. Some of them takes
the food remains back to home with box.
2. PLASTIC WASTES:
Different measures adopted helps to reduce the plastic waste production to minimum.
1. Steel glasses maintained by NSS, and different Departments like BBA, Hindi, for common
use for programmes in the college. This makes sure a disposable glass free campus.
2. food is not given in plastics from the canteen.
3. students do not throw any plastic wastes in the campus.
23
4. there are two large bins supplied by Panchayath, kept in the campus, one in front of office
and other near western block, for collection of plastic wastes if any, which will be collected
back by the Panchayath for recycling.
Being an educational institution, the issue of plastic waste is not felt as a serious issue and
hence no special methods of its management is practiced in the campus.
3. E - WASTE
A detailed survey on electronic and electrical equipments being unused in the campus was
done by physics students and the detailed report is presented separately. The table below
shows the data collected.
LIST OF ITEM
NOT
REPAIRABLE REPAIRABL
E OLD
WORKING
BUT NOT
USING
TOTAL
COST
UPS 30 3
66000
CPU 53 2 2
855000
MONITOR 29
23
364000
PRINTER 15 2
68000
SPEAKER 25
15000
SMPS 5
4500
MOUSE 17
3400
WATER
PURIFIER 2
6000
KEYBOARD 32
1
13200
PHONE(FAX) 1
8100
STAND FAN 1
3000
MULTIMETER
4
2400
CRO 1
1100
SIGNAL
GENERATOR 1
17000
POWER
SUPPLY 14
57000
PROJECTOR 5
35000
INTERCOME 8
12000
LANDPHONE 6
13200
24
MODEM 1 1
1500
REFRIGERATO
R 1
1
22000
INDUCTION
STOVE
1
3000
COMPUTER 5
123000
STEP UP 3
27000
HEATER
1 3000
TV
1 10000
TABLE FAN
3 4500
STABILIZER 2
3000
OVEN 1
10000
ELECTRIC
BURNER 1
1000
COOLER 1
29490
256 16 26 7 1781390
The data depicts a serious situation and is an eye opener for future plans as how to reduce
and recycle e-wastes.
C. ENERGY AUDIT
A detailed energy audit was done by Physics students. The total energy consumption of the
campus, renewable energy use, other energy saving/ generating measures etc were
documented. A proposal was also made as to how much energy we can save if the tube
lights are replaced by LEDs. Summary of energy audit is as follows.
Total power requirement in one month : 4008 kWh
Total annual power requirement : 4008 x 12 = 48096 kWh
Total power obtained from renewable
energy source/month (Solar) : 2400 kWh
Total power obtained in an year : 2400 x 12 = 28800 kWh
25
Percentage of annual power requirement met
by the renewable energy source : (28800/48096) x 100 = 58.88%
Total Number of LED tubes : 281
Annual lighting power met through LED : 281 x 24 x 5 x 30 x 12 = 12139.2 kWh
Annual lighting power met though
fluorescent tube : 71 x 40 x 5 x 30 x 12 = 5112 kWh
Annual lighting power requirement : 12139.2 + 5112 = 17251.2 kWh
Percentage of annual lighting power requirement
met through LED : (12139.2/17251.2) x 100 = 70.37 %
Energy sensitive moves in the campus
1. Solar Power Generation System:
The college has installed 21.6 K V solar panels and for optimal production the panels should
be washed clean every week. Other kinds of maintenance are done by the service providers,
Team Sustain. This proposal in the year 2012-13 was a pioneering effort in the history of
Arts and Science Colleges in Kerala as the first college thinking of generation of green
energy. The solar initiative assumes greater dimensions of significance if put in the context
of the national endeavour for energy sustainability and the global scenario in relation to
non-renewable energy resources. Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission was approved in
2011 as part of the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) and the objective was
to “establish India as a global leader in solar energy, by creating the policy conditions for its
diffusion across the country as quickly as possible”. The Mission adopted a 3 - phase
approach, Phase 1 (up to 2012 - 13), Phase 2 (2013-17) and Phase 3 (2017 - 22). Payyanur
College joined the bandwagon of the JNNSM in the first phase itself and possibly became
26
the first college in the Kerala State to actualize the green energy initiative with the
unanimous approval of the project by the Board of Management. The action plan involved
steps like choosing the service provider, negotiating the prospects, and overseeing the panel
installation and ensuring the optimal functioning. The project of installing the 21.6 KW grid
interactive, roof-top solar power generation panels was thus installed. 155- 1800 KW power
was generated since then every month. The grid connection facility was not available in
2012-13 and application for grid interaction is submitted once the government of Kerala
introduced the scheme.
2. Roof-top rain-water harvesting
The second major green initiative was to harvest roof-top and overhead rainwater by
making a ferrocement rainwater harvesting pond with 8.75 lakh litre holding capacity. The
overflow pipe of the college water tank was also linked to the tank to save the spillage. The
overflow of the dug pond is rechanneled through a filtering mechanism and allowed to drain
into the nearby tube well. This artificial tank, built in the gradients of the landscaped hillock
on which the college stands, saves nine lakh litres of water from flowing downhill and
flooding the highway NH 17, finally filling the Arabian Sea a few kilometres away. Thus the
second project turns out to be a multi-purpose one.
3. Biogas
Two large biogas units (3.5m3 capacity) are set up in the campus, one near the canteen and
the other near the girls hostel. The system is important in 3 ways – 1) it prevents the food
waste issue of the campus; 2) it provides good fertilizer for biofarming in the campus and 3)
it provides biogas for burning a stove for about 3 hours a day.
4. Carbon foot print
The carbon release is an important measure of how sustainable we are. there are many
different ways carbon emission by an individual. Vehicle use is one of the most important
factor among that. Here the students from Department of Zoology, made a survey among all
in the whole campus and the data is as follows.
27
Department Two wheeler
Four
wheeler
ZOOLOGY 11 0
BOTANY 9 0
CHEMISTRY 11 0
PHYSICS 9 0
MATHS 7 0
HINDI 9 0
FUN.HINDI 20 0
ENGLISH 12 0
MALAYALAM 5 0
BCOM 15 0
BBA 11 0
POLITICS 4 0
ECONOMICS 11 0
HISTORY 10 0
Total 144
0
STAFF 37 26
None of the students use four wheeler for coming to college. 144 students use two
wheelers, though not regularly. This comes to 9.25% of the total students. It is promising to
see that more than 90% of the students use public transport facilities to come to college.
28
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE THRUSTS
1. The total green cover of the campus is being reduced – making the campus more
green should be an area of future thrust. Qualitative degradation also needs to be
corrected by replacing exotics like acacia with native plants.
2. The campus harbours rich biodiversity as evident from the studies on animals and
plants. The different habitats in the campus need to be preserved for a sustainable
existence and as a message for the student community and general public at large.
3. The chemistry of soil and water of the campus calls for some scientific interventions
4. Food waste and plastic wastes are not posing serious threats at present. However
more vigilant measures and awareness programs are needed to make our campus a
model one.
5. E waste, though not a visible issue at present, is going to be a serious issue in the
near future. Steps to reduce, reuse and recycle e wastes are to be planned in a
scientific way.
6. More rain water harvesting projects can be taken up in the campus as we have a vast
campus of over 60 acres land.