green house building seminar bsn dengan j-chif

WELCOMEINTERNATIONAL SEMINAR

STANDARDIZATION FOR GREEN BUILDING MATERIALS

Park Hotel, Gaharu BallroomBandung, August 6th 2015

2

Agenda AcaraInternational Seminar On Standardization For Green Building Material

No Kegiatan Waktu Pembicara/Moderator

1 Pembukaan 08:30-09:00

1. Ir. Nyoman Supriyatna, M.Sc(Badan Standardisasi Nasional )

2.Mitsuo Matsumoto (Japan Ministry of Economic,Trade, and Industry - METI)

3. Ikuo Tomita (Japan Construction Material & Housing Equipment Industries Federation (J-CHIF))

2 Topik 1 : Thermal Performance of Windows

09:00 - 09.45 Moderator : Ir. I. Nyoman Supriyatna, M.Sc

09.00 - 09:30 1. Hiroyuki Ishizumi ( LIXIL Corporation)

09:30 - 09:45 2. Asosiasi Kaca Lembaran dan Pengaman Indonesia

3 Topik 2: Water saving closet

09:45 - 11.15 Moderator : Ir. I. Nyoman Supriyatna, M.Sc

09:45 - 10:15 Naonori Araki (TOTO LTD.)

10:15 - 10:30 Dr.Ir.Lintong Sopandi Hutahaean,M.ChE( Kepala Balai Besar Keramik)

4 Topik 3: Wood-Plastic Recycled Composite (WPRC)

11:00 - 11.45 Moderator : Y. Kristianto W.

11:00 - 11:30 Takeyasu Kikuchi (WPC Corporation)

11:30 - 11.45 Prof. (R ).Dr.Ir.Arief Sabaruddin, CES(Kepala Pusat Litbang Permukiman , Kementerian PU-PERA)

7 Topik 4: High Solar Reflectance Paint

11.45 - 12.30 Moderator : Y. Kristianto W.

11:45 - 12:15 Toshiya Takahashi (Japan Paint Manufacturers Association )12:15 - 12:30 Asosiasi Produsen Cat Indonesia

8 Sesi tanya jawab II 12:30 - 12:45 Moderator : Y. Kristianto W.

9 Closing Meeting : Mr. Ir. I. Nyoman Supriyatna, M.Sc 12:45 - 13:00

PENGUJIAN KLOSET SNI 03-0797-2006

BALAI BESAR KERAMIKBANDUNG, 6 AGUSTUS 2015

JENIS CLOSET

Monoblok / One Piece Duoblok / Dual Pieces / Close Couple

JENIS CLOSET

Duoblok Terpisah /separated toiled Gantung /Wall Hung

Duduk Tegak /Wall-Faced

MEKANISME FLUSHING

NO PARAMETER

1 Bentuk dan ukuran

2 Sifat tampak

3 Kedataran permukaan

4 Pengujian saluran pembuangan dengan bola kayu

5Pengujian kebocorana. Pengujian kebocoran airb. b. Pengujian kebocoran udara

6

Pengujian pembilasan untuk kloset duduk dengan pembilasan terpadua. Sponsb. Serbuk gergajic. Kertas toiletd. Bola plastice. Simulasi

NO PARAMETER

7 Pengujian pembebanan

8 Daya serap air

9 Ketahanan terhadap kejut suhu

10 Ketahanan terhadap retak-retak

11 Ketahanan terhadap bahan kimia

12 Ketahanan terhadap noda

LINGKUP PENGUJIAN KLOSETSNI 03-0797-2006

PERALATAN UTAMANO PARAMETER ALAT

1 Bentuk dan ukuran Jangka Sorong

2 Sifat tampak Visual (mata)

3 Kedataran permukaan Baji, Waterpass

4 Pengujian saluran pembuangan dengan bola kayu bola kayu min. ф 36 mm

5Pengujian kebocorana. Pengujian kebocoran airb. b. Pengujian kebocoran udara

StopwatchManometer

6

Pengujian pembilasan untuk kloset duduk dengan pembilasan terpadua. Sponsb. Serbuk gergajic. Kertas toiletd. Bola plastike. Simulasi

Spons ф 30 ± 5 mm, panjang 10-100 mmSerbuk gergaji halusKertas toilet 100 x 110 mmBola plastik min. ф 40 mm, density = 1.05Kantong plastik

PERALATAN UTAMANO PARAMETER ALAT

7 Pengujian pembebanan Load Cell

8 Daya serap air

- Pengering / oven - Timbangan analitik - Pompa vakum- Bejana vakum

9 Ketahanan terhadap kejut suhu - Pengering / oven- Thermometer

10 Ketahanan terhadap retak-retak - Autoclave

11 Ketahanan terhadap bahan kimia- Pengering / oven- Bak tertutup tahan bahan kimia dengan pengatur panas

12 Ketahanan terhadap noda Pengering / oven

PEMAKAIAN AIRNO JENIS KLOSET PENGGUNAAN AIR

(LITER)FULL/HALF

1 KLOSET DUDUK DUOBLOK6

6/34,2/3

2 KLOSET DUDUK GANTUNG 4,5/36/3

9 KLOSET DUDUK TEGAK6

6/34,5/3

10 KLOSET DUDUK MONOBLOK

66/3

4,5/34,2/2,84,3/2,8

4,84/2,5

13

• Penggunaan air belum menjadi parameter standar mutu kloset duduk dalam SNI 03-0797-2006

• Terlihat ada upaya mengurangi penggunaan air pada kloset– Mengurangi volume tangki– Menyediakan dua tombol pengeluran air: satu tombol

untuk mengeluarkan setengah tangki dan tombol lainya untuk mengeluarkan seluruh air dalam tangki

• Dalam pengujian teramati, pada beberapa produk, setelah pembilasan air masih mengalir beberapa saat sampai flapper menutup rapat

PENUTUP

The Development of Composite Panels by Using Sawdust and PVC Powder

By : L a s i n o


Introduction

1. High amount of wood manufacture waste (dust & chips)

2. The waste can be used as fuel

3. Building material innovation needed in construction works

alternative building components reducing the environment impact

The development of composite

panels by using sawdust

and PVC powder,

Background

Outcome Expected


Material Resources

Sawn Timber Manufacture

Chipping Grinding Wood Dust


Research Objective1. To provide building component alternative 2. To produce good quality and cheap composite boards 3. Wood waste optimizing as building materials4. Reducing the environment impacts5. To fulfill building materials needed in housing and

building construction6. To prevent forest deterioration

Materials1. Dust & chips wood waste form from timber manufacture 2. The PVC powder from recycling agent & grinding process (passed 50

& 30 mesh sieve)


• The wood powder and PVC powder blended in variously content from 30 to 50% by weight of wood,

• To achieve the good mixture, it is possible to add the liquid wax as a substitution material,

• Blending process by using mixer takes 3 to 5 minutes a batch.

Methods – Mixing Process


Methods – Molding

1. Panel size : 240 cm x 120 cm x thickness.2. Mixture composition : (30:70), (40:60), and (50:50).3. Amount of specimen : 6 pcs/ each composition4. Molding temperature : 160oC5. Molding pressure : 5 kg/cm2

Step-2; Full-Scale Machine (Hot Press Machine)

Methods – Molding

1. Panel size : 60 cm x 60 cm x thickness.2. Mixture composition : (30:70), (40:60), and (50:50).3. Amount of specimen : 6 pcs/ each composition4. Molding temperature : 150, 155, 160 and 165oC5. Molding pressure : 5 and 10 kg/cm2

Step-1; Small-Scale Machine (Electrical Hot Press)


Methods – MoldingStep-1; Small-Scale Machine (Electrical Hot Press)

Raw Materials

Composing Molding Production


Methods – MoldingStep-2; Full-Scale Machine (Hot Press Machine)

Raw Materials

Mixing Molding Production


Result & DiscussionStep-1; Small-Scale Machine (Electrical Hot Press)

Table 1-a - Molding Process by 5 kg/cm2 Pressure

No Mixture Composition

Pressure Temperature SpecificGravity

BendingStrength.

Bonding strength

Moisturecontent

PVC : Sawdust kg/cm2 oC Gr/cm3 Kg/cm2 Kg/cm2 %1 30 : 70 5 150 0.96 54.2 8.6 12.692 155 0.98 68.7 12.9 10.013 160 1.06 83.8 14.2 8.624 165 1.04 82.4 12.7 7.641 40 : 60 5 150 0.97 90.7 12.4 11.122 155 0.99 112.6 17.6 8.413 160 1.04 134.8 32.4 7.344 165 1.03 122.4 28.7 7.141 50 : 50 5 150 0.97 96.2 21.2 9.102 155 0.97 126.6 36.2 8.123 160 0.99 165.4 53.2 6.024 165 0.99 161.4 49.8 5.66

Note : PVC : Poly Vinyl Chloride


Result & DiscussionTable 1-b - Molding Process by 10 kg/cm2 Pressure

Note : PVC : Poly Vinyl Chloride

Step-2; small-Scale Machine (Hot Press Machine)

No Mix proportion

Pressure Temperature SpecificGravity

BendingStrength.

Bonding strength

Moisturecontent

PVC : Sawdust kg/cm2 oC Gr/cm3 Kg/cm2 Kg/cm2 %1 30 : 70 10 150 0.99 59.8 12.1 12.022 155 1.02 79.6 14.2 10.013 160 1.04 86.1 18.6 9.004 165 1.04 82.0 17.9 7.041 40 : 60 10 150 0.97 94.2 16.4 9.802 155 0.99 124.6 18.9 9.183 160 1.01 151.2 29.2 7.644 165 1.01 148.6 8.6 6.011 50 : 50 10 150 0.98 108.4 21.4 8.042 155 0.99 136.4 26.2 7.083 160 1.02 172.2 32.4 6.024 165 1.02 168.9 34.2 5.06


Result & Discussion

Figure1 – Correlation Between Strength & Molding Temperature

Forming Process with Pressure 5 kg/cm2

0

40

80

120

160

200

145 150 155 160 165 170

Temperature (0C)

Ben

ding

Stren

gth

(kg/

cm2)

Bending (Proporsi 30:70) Bending (Proporsi 40:60) Bending (Proporsi 50:50)

Forming Process with Pressure 10 kg/cm2

0

40

80

120

160

200

145 150 155 160 165 170

Temperature (0C)

Ben

ding

Stren

gth

(kg/cm

2)

Bending (Proportion 30:70) Bending (Proportion 40:60) Bending (Proportion 50:50)


Result & Discussion

Table 1-b - Molding Process by 5 kg/cm2 Pressure at 160 oC

Step-2; Full-Scale Machine (Hot Press Machine)

No Mixture Compositi

on

SpecificGravity

WaterAbsorp-

tion

ThicknessSwelling

BendingStrength*

)

Bonding

strength*)

Moisturecontent

Nail withdraw

*)

PVC : Sawdust

g/cm3 % % Kgf/cm2 Kgf/cm2 % kgf

1 30 : 70 1,01 47,7 62,5 78,3 13,9 9,02 22,6

2 40 : 60 1,01 34,1 25,0 114,8 28,2 8,40 29,7

3 50 : 50 0,98 5,23 15,0 153,9 48,0 6,20 32,6

Standard requirement

Min. 0,40 - - Min. 50 Min. 25 Max. 15 -

Note : PVC : Poly Vinyl Chloride *) : average of 6 samples


Result & Discussion

Figure2 – Correlation between Strength & Mixture Composition

Test Result of Full Scale Panels Forming Process with Pressure 5kg/cm2

at 1600C

0

40

80

120

160

200

0 1 2 3 4

Mix Proportion

Stre

ngth

(kg/

cm2 )

Bending Bonding

30:70 40:60 50:50

Mixture Composition


• The bending strength inclines by increasing of PVC composition in mixture all wood particle parts covered by PVC as a bonding material

• The optimum molding process is at 160 oC and 5 kg/cm2 pressure. It indicates that molding temperature and pressure determine the panel quality

• The best mixture is a rate of PVC 50% by weight of wood dust. The product at this condition shows the figures of bending and bonding structure, which comply to the standard requirement. It indicates that PVC content in mixture composition determines the panel quality

S . y . n . t . h . e . s . y . s


• Sawdust is a potential board raw material, which is effectively bonded by PVC

• Sawdust and PVC powder composite panels is liable to be cheaper, easier supplying, and good quality materials

• The optimum composite panels molding process is at 160 oC and 5 kg/cm2 pressure.

• The best mixture of composite panels is a rate of PVC 50% by weight of wood dust. It indicates that PVC content in mixture composition affects the bending and bonding structure, which comply to the standard requirement.

• The utilization of wood waste as composite panels might not strongly reduce the environment impact only, but also prevent the forest deterioration

C.o.n.c.l.u.s.s.i.o.n

High Performance Glass &

Contribution to Green Building

Hence Purnawan Park Hotel, Bandung

Aug 6th , 2015

International Seminar on Standardization For Green Building Materials

June 2010, Greenship for New BuildingRevised February 2012 - (Voluntary Basis)

January 2011, Greenship for Existing Building

November 2011, Greenship Home April 2012, Greenship for Interior Space

Voluntary Basis

28

Green Building Trend in Indonesia

Established 2009

DKI Jakarta Government RegulationNo. 38/2012 ( Applied - April 2012)

OTTV ≤ 45 W/m2 (Overall Thermal Transfer Value) Mandatory for New Building

- Early 2013, Proposal by SNI to achieved OTTV ≤ 35 W/m2 - postponed by JKT’s Government due to close timing with April’s announcement.

Possible adoption by other cities : Bandung, Surabaya, Makassar ??

1. Identify which component contributes the most to OTTV.2. Review Solar Correction Factor (CF)

=> Review building orientation (east, west, north, south)

3. Review glazing selection=> Shading Coefficient (SC) & U Value (Uv)

4. Review Sun Shading / Visor => Will further improve glazing SC

5. Review Window to Wall Ratio (WWR) & Wall Material (Uw & TDeq)

OTTV - What are the key parameters for Glass?OTTV = α((1-WWR)*Uw)*TDeq) + (WWR*Uf*ΔT) +

(WWR*SC*CF)Wall factor Fenestration Factor

For Glazing – SC & U Value are the Important factor in OTTV

Introduction – Energy (Heat) SourcesOutside Inside

Long IR >2500 nm

UV, visible, short IR

Re-radiated heat. Long IR. Also important to block the transfer. Often neglected.

Long IR >2500 nm

GLASS

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Intensity(W/m²)

Wavelength (nm)280 380 780

Energy

2500

UV Light Short I.R.

Introduction – Solar Radiancy

Solar spectrum :

UV : 280 to 380 nm 5% energy

Light : 380 to 780 nm 50% energy

Short I.R. : 780 to 2500 nm 45% energy

• DET : Direct Energy Transmission• ER : Energy Reflection• EA : Energy Absorption• G Value = SF : Solar factor

Key parameters to characterize a glass product

}g

ERre

0.080.87

DET

te 0.85

1

Single Glass Clear 3mm

Heat

qiqe0.05 0.02

0.07

EAae

Solar Factor

Think of it as the glass ability to block the heat, we feel, from the sun

The lower the SF, the better!

How to decrease the solar factor ?

ReradiatedEnergy

ReradiatedEnergy

DirectEnergyTransmission(DET)

EnergyAbsorption(EA)

EnergyReflection

(ER)

Modify the glass composition (mainly changes

the absorption) tinted float

Apply a coating...(mainly changes the energy reflection/absorption) pyrolitic coatings

– Stopsol– Sunergy

magnetron coatings– Solarbel– Stopray

Glazing Functions – Light & Solar Control

Solar Factor (SF) = Direct Energy Transmission (DET) +

Inside Re-radiated Energy (EAi)

Using Colored / Tinted Glass35% more effective in blocking solar energy (6mm Clear

Vs 6mm Green).

6mm Clear Glass

6mm Green Glass

0,07 0,81

0,020,1SF0,83

0,06 0,39

0,150,40SF

0,54

U-Value = 5,7 W/m2.K

Modify the composition of the glass

COPY RIGHT RESERVED.

MINIMUM free solar heat

Outside Inside

COATINGHeat being reflected

Method of Coating – Basic Concept

Types of Coated glass

Low E

Pyrolithic Coating(On Line)

Low E + Solar Control

Magnetron Sputtering Coating

(Off Line)

Low E Low-E +

Solar ControlReflective

Solar control

ReflectiveSolar control

Pyrolitic / Online process High Temp. Process -> High Durability & Scratch Resistance

LoadWasher Inspectio

n

Buffer

BufferCoat

zones

Unload

Magnetron / Offline process Vacuum – deposit -> Custom coatings benefitCombination with various tinted glass

Using Coated Reflective Glass 53% more effective in blocking solar energy (6mm Clear Vs 6mm

Stopsol Classic Green).

6mm Clear Glass

6mm Stopsol Classic Green Glass (#2)

0,07 0,81

0,020,10SF

0,830,11 0,22

0,170,50SF

0,39


Reflective Coating

Method of Coating – Reflective Glass

Using Coated Solar Control Low E 49% more effective in blocking solar energy (6mm Clear Vs

6mm Sunergy Green) + Lower U-Value (26% Lower Vs non Low-E Glass)

6mm Clear Glass

6mm Sunergy Green Glass (#2)

0,07 0,81

0,020,10SF

0,830,06 0,31

0,110,52SF0,42



Solar Control Low E Coating

Method of Coating – Solar Control Low E

Indoor temperature : Tin

Outdoor temperature : Tout

Convection

Radiation

Conduction

U-Value =Heat loss

Temperature difference(W/m².K)

Radiation

Convection

Represent

70% of the

heat transfer

Represent

30% of the

heat transfer

Glazing Functions – Thermal Insulation

Amount of heat transfer through the glass (per m2) per Degree Celsius difference between outdoor and indoor temperature

Example : if the U-value of the glass was 4.0 w/m2 K, then…

Outdoor Temperature

Indoor Temperature

Temperature diff

Heat transferW/m2

25 25 0 0

26 25 1 4

27 25 2 8

28 25 3 12

30 25 5 20

The lower the U-Value, the better performance the glass.

U-value

4 mm Single ClearU = 5,8 W/(m² K)

Ar

Glazing functions – Thermal insulationGlazing Functions – Thermal Insulation

4 mm Single Low EU = 3.7 W/(m² K)

4-12-4 IGU ClearU = 2.9 W/(m² K)

4-12-4 IGU Low EU = 1.9 W/(m² K)

4-12Argon-4 IGU Low EU = 1.6 W/(m² K)

IGU with Low E coating give better thermal insulation (Lower U Value)

OTTV simulation

OTTV simulation

Normal Glass

Coated Glass

Double Glazing w/ Coated Glass

Coated Glass helps reduce up to 50 -65% heat gain vs clear/tinted float

Building with GBCI certification – New BuildingKementerian PU

Nomor Sertifikat :002/PP/NB/III-2013

Peringkat Yang Dicapai :Platinum. Agustus 2013 - Agustus 2016

Sertifikat GREENSHIP :Bangunan Baru (New Building-NB).

Building with GBCI certification – New BuildingAlamanda Tower

Nomor Sertifikat :003/RP/NB/XII-2014

Peringkat Yang Dicapai :Gold, Desember 2014 - Desember 2017


Building with GBCI certification – New Building

Green Office Park 6Nomor Sertifikat :

006/RP/NB/V-2015

Peringkat Yang Dicapai :Gold Mei 2015 - Mei 2018


Terima Kasih

green house building seminar bsn dengan j-chif

Devices & Hardware