gregg w. stone md for the acuity investigators gregg w. stone md for the acuity investigators a...
TRANSCRIPT
Gregg W. Stone MD
for the ACUITY Investigators
Gregg W. Stone MD
for the ACUITY Investigators
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Final One-Year Results from the ACUITY Trial
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Final One-Year Results from the ACUITY Trial
Moderateand highrisk ACS
(n=13,819)
Study Design – First RandomizationStudy Design – First Randomization
An
gio
gra
ph
y w
ith
in 7
2h
Aspirin in allClopidogrel
dosing and timingper local practice
Aspirin in allClopidogrel
dosing and timingper local practice
UFH/Enox+ GP IIb/IIIa(n=4,603)
Bivalirudin+ GP IIb/IIIa(n=4,604)
BivalirudinAlone
(n=4,612)
R*
*Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration*Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration
Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy (N = 13,819)
Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy (N = 13,819)
Medicalmanagement
PCI
CABG
56%
11%
33%
Study Design – Second RandomizationStudy Design – Second Randomization
UFH/Enox+ GP IIb/IIIa(N=4,603)
Bivalirudin+ GP IIb/IIIa(N=4,604)
BivalirudinAlone
(N=4,612)
R*
GPI upstream (N=2294)
GPI CCL for PCI (N=2309)
GPI upstream (N=2311)
GPI CCL for PCI (N=2293)
Aspirin in allClopidogrel
dosing and timingper local practice
Aspirin in allClopidogrel
dosing and timingper local practice
*Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration*Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration
Moderateand highrisk ACS(n=13,819
Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy (N = 13,819)
Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy (N = 13,819)
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
5
15
25
Isch
emic
Co
mp
osi
te (
%)
Days from Randomization
10
20 UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIaBivalirudin + IIb/IIIa
Bivalirudin alone
EstimateP
(log rank)
30 day
7.4%0.367.8%0.347.9%
—
EstimateP
(log rank)
16.3%0.3816.5%0.3116.4%
1 year
—
p=0.55
H+GPI vs. Bivalirudin aloneHR [95% CI] = 1.05 (0.95-1.17)
H+GPI vs. Bivalirudin+GPI HR [95% CI] = 1.05 (0.94-1.16)
Ischemic Composite Endpoint(Death, MI, unplanned revascularization for ischemia)
Ischemic Composite Endpoint(Death, MI, unplanned revascularization for ischemia)
UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin AloneUFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone
Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial Infarction
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
5
10
15
Days from Randomization
UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin AloneUFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone
UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIaBivalirudin + IIb/IIIa
Bivalirudin alone
EstimateP
(log rank)
30 day
4.4%0.694.6%0.364.8%
—
EstimateP
(log rank)
6.2%0.636.4%0.107.1%
1 year
—
p=0.24
MI
(%)
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
5
10
15
Days from Randomization
Un
pla
nn
ed R
evas
c. (
%)
UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIaBivalirudin + IIb/IIIa
Bivalirudin alone
UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin AloneUFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone
Unplanned RevascularizationUnplanned Revascularization
EstimateP
(log rank)
30 day
2.3%0.202.8%0.722.4%
—
EstimateP
(log rank)
8.6%0.179.5%0.528.9%
1 year
—
p=0.39
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
3
4
5
Ste
nt
Th
rom
bo
sis
(%
)
Days from Randomization
2
1
Stent Thrombosis (Protocol Defn.)Stent Thrombosis (Protocol Defn.)Drug-eluting Stent (DES) vs. Bare Metal Stent(BMS)Drug-eluting Stent (DES) vs. Bare Metal Stent(BMS)
EstimateP
(log rank)
DES (N=4630)0.38
2.2%
1 year
BMS (N=2528) 2.3%
All (N=7158) 2.2%
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
3
4
5
Mo
rtal
ity
(%)
Days from Randomization
2
1
Mortality: 524 total deaths at 1-yearMortality: 524 total deaths at 1-yearUFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin AloneUFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone
UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIaBivalirudin + IIb/IIIa
Bivalirudin alone
EstimateP
(log rank)
1.4%0.531.6%0.391.6%
—
EstimateP
(log rank)
4.4%0.934.2%0.663.8%
1 year
—
p=0.90
H+GPI vs. Bivalirudin aloneHR [95% CI] = 0.95 (0.78-1.18)
H+GPI vs. Bivalirudin+GPI HR [95% CI] = 0.99 (0.80-1.21)
0 1 2
Death at 1-YearDeath at 1-YearUFH/Enoxaparin + GPIIb/IIIa vs. Bivalirudin aloneUFH/Enoxaparin + GPIIb/IIIa vs. Bivalirudin alone
Hazard ratio±95% CI
Hazard ratio±95% CI
Bivalalone
UFH/Enox+ IIb/IIIa
HR (95% CI) Pint
0.96
Bivalirudin alone betterBivalirudin alone better UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa betterUFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa better
3.2% 4.0% 0.95 (0.70-1.29)
6.8% 6.7% 1.03 (0.64-1.66)
4.0% 4.3% 0.95 (0.66-1.37)
Actual Treatment
PCI (n=5179)
CABG (n=1040)
Medical (n=2994)
4.8%
2.4%
5.0%
3.6%
1.04 (0.80-1.34)
0.84 (0.55-1.28)0.40
Biomarkers (CK/Trop)
Elevated (n=5072)
Normal (n=3402)
3.5%
4.0%
4.2%
4.4%
0.90 (0.68-1.18)
1.05 (0.74-1.48)0.52
Pre Thienopyridine
Yes (n=5751)
No (n=3305)
1 yr KM estimate
Mo
rtal
ity
(%)
Days from Randomization
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 3900
5
15
30
10
25
20
p=0.04
1 yearEstimate
Major Bleed only (without MI) (N=551) 12.5%28.9%Both MI and Major Bleed (N=94)
3.4%No MI or Major Bleed (N=12,557)MI only (without Major Bleed) (N=611) 8.6%
Impact of MI and Major Bleeding (non-CABG) in the First 30 Days on Risk of Death Over 1 Year
Cox model adjusted for baseline predictors, with non-CABG major bleeding and MI as time-updated covariates
Cox model adjusted for baseline predictors, with non-CABG major bleeding and MI as time-updated covariates
Influence of Major Bleeding and MI in the First 30 Days on Risk of Death Over 1 Year
Major bleedingMajor bleeding 2.89 (2.24-3.72)2.89 (2.24-3.72) <0.0001<0.0001
Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial Infarction 2.47 (1.87-3.27)2.47 (1.87-3.27) <0.0001<0.0001
0 1 2 3 4
HR ± 95% CIHR ± 95% CI P-valueP-valueHR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
ConclusionsConclusions
In patients with moderate and high risk ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy with the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Bivalirudin is an acceptable substitute for either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin
Compared to either UFH/enoxaparin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors or bivalirudin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
A bivalirudin alone strategy results in marked reduction of bleeding at 30 days, and similar rates of mortality and composite ischemia at 1-year
The results of this study further establish the important relationship between iatrogenic bleeding complications and the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS
In patients with moderate and high risk ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy with the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Bivalirudin is an acceptable substitute for either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin
Compared to either UFH/enoxaparin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors or bivalirudin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
A bivalirudin alone strategy results in marked reduction of bleeding at 30 days, and similar rates of mortality and composite ischemia at 1-year
The results of this study further establish the important relationship between iatrogenic bleeding complications and the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS