ground-water levels in new mexico 1959€¦ · a. house area l. crow flats a. clovis area m....

134

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • GROUND-WATER lEVELS IN NEW MEXICO t 1959

  • AREAS OF WATER-LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

    A. HOUSE AREA L. CROW FLATS

    a. CLOVIS AREA M. SUNSHINE VALLEYC. PORTALES VALLEY N. ALBUa UERQUE -BELEN AREA

    D. CAUSEY-LINGO AREA O. HOT SPRINGS BASIN

    E. TATUM - lOVINGTON- HOS8S AREA P. GRANTS -ilLUEWATER AREA

    F. ROSWELL 8ASIN Q. AN IMAS VALLEY

    G. CARLSBAD AR EA R. PLAYAS VAllEY

    S. lORDSBURG VAllEY

    1: VIRDEN VAllEY

    ESTANCIA VAllEY U. SAN SIMON VAllEY

    K. TULAROSA -ALAMOGORDO AREA V. MIMBRES VALLEY

    W. GRANTS COUNTY AREA

    H· HONDO VAllEY

    I. PENASCO VAllEY

    ~ SHADED ~

    UNDERGROUND WATER BASINSDECLARED BY STATE ENGINEER

    Areas in which water levels were being measured periodically in New Mexico, andunderground water basins declared by the State Engineer, as of December 1959.

    MIMBRES VALLEY B. ESTANCIA

    2. ROSWELL ARTESIAN 9. PORTALES

    3. lEA COUNTY 10. HONDO

    4. HOT SPRINGS II. PEN AS eo

    5. VI RDEN VAllEY 12. PLAYAS VALlEY

    6. CARLSBAD 1:3. 8LlJEWATER

    7. ANIMAS VALLEY 14. RIO GRANDE

  • REPORT 24

    State Engineer

    'nr~·e. N. Mex.

    UNDwWATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    By

    H. O. Reeder and Others

    U. S. Gt)o logical Survey

    196:2

  • CONTENTSPage

    Seasonal measurements ........•............•...•........

    Abstract '" .... '" ................................•..........•.....•.Introduction •..................................................•.

    Scope of the program of water-level measurements .•.•...•...•Significance and presentation of data ..•......•.••..••......

    Annual measurements .0.0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

    Well-numbering system .......................................High Plains

    1113344

    House area, Quay County 6Clovis area, Curry County ......................•................. 10portales Valley, Roosevelt County 13Causey-Lingo area, Roosevelt County ....•..•.•..•..•......•••...•. 22Tatum-Lovington-Hobbs area, Lea County ...•..•..............•.•.•. 24

    Pecos River Valley

    Roswell basin, Chaves and Eddy Counties •••••.••••••.••••••••••••• 33Carlsbad area, Eddy County ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••• 75Hondo Valley, Lincoln County •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.• 82Penasco Valley, Chaves and Otero Counties ....••.•••••.•.•..•..••. 84

    South-Central Closed Basins

    Estancia Valley, Torrance and Santa Fe Counties ••...•.....•.•.... 85Tularosa-Alamogordo area, Otero County .•.••••••......•....•.•.•.. 90Crow Flats area, Otero County •.•...•••.........•...•.••...•••.••• 92

    Rio Grande Valley

    Sunshine Valley, Taos County, N. Mex., and Costilla County, Colo •• 93Albuquerque-Belen area, Sandoval, Bernalillo, Valencia, and

    Socorro Counties •......•.•.••••.•..•.••.••••.•......•.....••...• 96Hot Springs area, Sierra County ...••..•...•.•.•.•.•..•.••••.••.• 99Grants-Bluewater area, Valencia County ............••...•...•....• 102

    Southwestern New Mexico

    Animas, Playas, Lordsburg, Virden, and San Simon Valleys, HidalgoCounty .....•••.•••.•....•.•....•..••..•.••.•••••.....•.....•••.• 106

    Mimbres Valley, Luna County .•••.•.•.•..•...•.•.......•..••.•.•••• IIIGrant County •...•..........•....•..••••••.•.•......•...•...••.•.. 120

    Bibliography .....................................................

    i

    122

  • Count YJ N. Mex. 36

    9. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the southern part of Roswell basin, Eddy County, N. Mex. • 35

    5

    33

    Page

    1959 to January 1960northern extension

    CONTENTS

    ILLUSTRATIONS

    High Plains

    Pecos River Valley

    1. System of numbering wells in New Mexico

    7. Change of ground-water level from Januaryin the Salt Creek-Macho Draw area of theof Roswell basin, Chaves County, N. Mex.

    8. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the northern part of Roswell basin, Chaves County, N. Mex. 34

    2. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the House area, Quay County, N. Mex. ••••••••••••.•••••••• 6

    6. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the Tatum-Lovington-Hobbs area, Lea County, N. Mex ••••••• 24

    5. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960and depth to ground-water level in January 1960 in theCausey-Lingo area, Roosevelt County, N. Mex ••••••••••••••••• 22

    4. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in Portales Valley, Roosevelt County, N. Mex •••••••••••••••• 13

    3. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960and depth to ground-water level in January 1960 in the Clovisarea J Curry County, N. Mex. . ...... ~ . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . .. • . ... 10

    ii

    14. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the Carlsbad area, Eddy County, N. Mex •••••••.••••••••••• 75

    13. Mean monthly artesian water level in well 18.26.5.333 inRoswell basin, Eddy County, N. Mex ••••••••••••••••••••.•.••• 39

    12. Mean monthly artesian water level in well 13.25.27.211 inRoswell basin, Chaves County, N. Mex ••••••••••••••••.••••••• 38

    11. Mean monthly artesian water level in well 12.25.23.113 inRoswell basin, Chaves County, N. Mex. ••••••••••••••••••.•.•• 37

    10. Mean monthly artesian water levels in wells 10.24.9.333,10.24.21.212, and 11.24.29.242 in Roswell basin, Chaves

    Figure

  • CONTENTS

    ILLUSTRATIONS (co~tinued)Figure

    South-Central Closed Basins

    15. Change of ground-water level from Fehruary 1959 to February1960 in Estancia Valley, Torrance and Santa Fe Counties,

    iii

    Page

    N. Mex••••••• IO •• IO •• IO. IO •••••• IO •• IO ••• IO ••••••••••• IO •• IO. IO ••••• IO. 85

    16. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960and depth to ground-water level in January 1960 in theTUlarosa-Alamogordo area, Otero County, N. Mex ••.••••••••••• 90

    Rio Grande Valley

    17. Change of ground-water level from February 1959 to February1960 and depth to ground-water level in February 1960 inSunshine Valley, Taos County, N. Mex., and Costilla County,Colo. . . . . • . • . . • • • . • . • . • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • . • • • • • • • . . . . . • • . . . . . . . 93

    18. Change of ground-water level from February 1959 to February1960 and depth to ground-water level in February 1960 in theGrants-Bluewater area, Valencia County, N. Mex••••••.••••••• 102

    Southwestern New Mexico

    19. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, N. Mex•••••••••••••••••••• 106

    20. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the Deming area of Mimbres Valley, Luna County, N. Mex • •• III

    21. Change of ground-water level from January 1959 to January 1960in the ~olumbus area of Mimbres Valley, Luna County, N. Mex •• 112

    TableTABLES

    High PlainsPage

    1. Water levels in House area, Quay County, N. Mex., January 1960 7

    2. Seasonal water levels in wells in House area, Quay County,N. Mex., in 1959 •.•.••••.••••••••••..•••••••..•.•••.•.....•. 8

    3. Daily water level from recorder well 5.29.17.133, Quay County,N. Mex••• IO •• IO ••• 10 •• IO •••••• IO •••• IO ••• IO ••• IO ••••••• IO •• IO ••••• IO. • • 9

    4. Water levels in Curry County, N. Mex., January 1960 •••••••••• 11

  • iv

    Table

    CONTENTS

    TABLES (continued)

    High Plains (continued)Page

    5. Seasonal water levels in wells in Clovis area, Curry County,N.. Mex .. , in 1959 12

    6. Water levels in Portales Valley, Roosevelt County, N. Mex.,January 1960 14

    7. Seasonal water levels in wells in Portales Valley, RooseveltCounty, N. Mex., in 1959 ...•.•..•.••.•.••....•.••.•...•..... 17

    8. Daily waterCounty, N.

    levelMex.

    from recorder well IN.33.36.400c, Roosevelt.. .. 18

    9. Daily water level from recorder well 1.34.25.211, RooseveltCounty, N .. Mex.. 19

    10. Daily water level from recorder well 2.34.2.233, RooseveltCounty, N .. Mex.. 20

    11. Daily water level from recorder well 2.36.28.ll4b, RooseveltCounty, N. Mex. 21

    12. Water levels in theMex., January 1960

    Causey-Lingo area, Roosevelt County, N........................................... 23

    13. Seasonal water levels in wells in Causey-Lingo area, RooseveltCounty, N. Mex., in 1959 •••••••••••••••.•.•.•••••.•••.•••••• 23

    14. Water levels in Tatum-lovington-Hobbs area, Lea County, N.Mex., January 1960 •••••••••••••••••.•••••••••.•..•••..•••••• 25

    15. Seasonal water levels in wells in Tatum-Lovington-Hobbs area,Lea County, N. Mex., in 1959 •••.•.•••••••...•••••.••.••.••.• 28

    16. Daily waterCounty, N.

    levelMex.

    from recorder well l6.36.5.lot 2, Lea. . 3017. Daily water level from recorder well 16.38.3.333, Lea County,

    N. Mex. ••..•••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••...•.•.••••. 31

    18. Daily water level from recorder well 17.33.13.341, Lea County,N. Mex. • .••••••••••.•••••.••••.•..••••••••.••••.•••••• • • • 32

    Pecos River Valley

    19. Mean monthly and mean annual artesian heads in artesian wellsin Roswell basin in 1959 • _. • __ • _• __ • _•._•• _•••• __ • _• _• __ •• 40

  • CONTENTS

    TABLES (continued)Table

    Pecos River Valley (continued)

    v

    Page

    20. Departure in 1959 from average and cbange from 1958 to 1959 ofmean monthly and mean annual heads in artesian wells inRoswell basin e 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 40

    21. Water levels in Roswell basin, Chaves and Eddy Counties, N.Mex .. J January 1960 41

    ..............................22. Seasonal water levels in

    Eddy Counties, N. Mex.,wells in Roswell basin, Chaves andin 1959 49

    23. Daily waterCounty, N.

    24. Daily waterCounty, N.

    25. Daily waterCounty, N.

    26. Daily waterCounty, N.

    27. Daily waterCounty, N.

    28. Daily waterCounty, N.

    29. Daily waterCounty, N.

    30. Daily waterCounty, N.

    level from recorder well 10.24.9.333, ChavesMex.. .. 0 It .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52

    level from recorder well 10.24.21.212, ChavesMex. .. e'.. .. .. .. .. 53

    level from recorder well 11.23.3.342, ChavesMex 000 ••••••••••••••••••• 54

    level from recorder well 11.24.29.242, ChavesMex.. 55

    level from recorder well 12.25.23.113, ChavesMax••••••••• 00.00 ••••••• 000 ••••••••••••••••••••••• 56

    level from recorder well 13.25.27.211, ChavesMex•••• 000 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 57

    level from recorder well 13.26.7.333, ChavesMex ••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••• 58

    level from recorder well 14.26.30.111, ChavesMex•• 0 •• 000 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 59

    31. Daily water level from recorder well 16.25.6.313, Eddy County,N. Mex•••••••••••••• 00.00 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 60

    32. Daily water level from recorder well 16.25.11.113, Eddy County,N. Mex •••••• 0 •••••••••• 0 61

    33. Daily water level from recorder well 18.26.5.333, Eddy County,N. Mex•••••••••••••••••• 0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 62

    34. Daily water level from recorder well 18.26.7.234a, Eddy County,N. Mex 63

    35. Daily water level from recorder well 18.26.28.121a, EddyCounty, N. .Mex 64

  • viii

    Table

    CONTENTS

    TABLES (continued)

    Southwestern New Mexico (continued)Page

    64. Seasonal water levels in wells in Mimbres Valley, Luna County,N. Mex., in 1959 .••.•.•..•.•.••....••••..•..•..........•.•.• 116

    65. Daily water level from recorder well 24.8.4.111, Luna County,N. Mex. • 118

    66. Daily water level from recorder well 24.10.12.431, LunaCounty, N. Mex •.••..•...•.••.•.....•.•..•.••..•..•.••.••...• 119

    67. Water levels in Grant County, N. Mex., January 1960 •••••••••• 120

    68. Seasonal water levels in wells in Grant County, N. Mex., in1959 •.•.•..•.••...•..•.•...•.....•...••.•.••.•••..•••••.••.. 120

    69. Daily water level from recorder well 18.15.11.323, GrantCounty, N. Mex••.•••....•.••..••.•.......•.•.•.•.....•..•••. 121

  • GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Compiled by

    H. O. ReederU. S. Geological Survey

    ABSTRACT

    Water levels are measured periodically in a network of observationwells to record changes in ground-water storage in areas where theground-water resources are being developed~ This report includes theannual measurements made in January or February 1960, with changes inwater level in 1959, and seasonal and daily water levels in 1959.Water-level changes for 1959 are presented graphically on maps formost areas of observation.

    The areas of observation are as follows: House, Clovis, PortalesValley, Causey-Lingo, Tatum-Lovington-Hobbs, Roswell basin, Carlsbad,Hondo Valley, Penasco Valley, Estancia Valley, Tularosa-Alamogordo,Crow Flats, Sunshine Valley, Albuquerque-Belen, Hot Springs basin,Grants-Bluewater, the Animas, Playas, Lordsburg, San Simon, Virden, andMimbres Valleys, and parts of Grant County.

    INTRODUCTION

    Scope of the Program of Water-Level Measurements

    The program of measuring water levels in an established networkof observation wells in New Mexico was continued in 1959 as part of theinvestigation of ground-water resources in cooperation with the StateEngineer Office. Beginning with the study of the Roswell basin in 1925,the observation-well program has been continued and expanded from timeto time to obtain information on changes in water level in newly devel-oped areas, primarily where large supplies have been developed for irri-gation. The frontispiece map shows the location and approximate extentof the areas of observation as of December 1959.

    Water levels measured periodically in several wells in an areaprovide a good index to the status of the particular ground-water res-ervoir. A decline in water levels reflects a decrease in the waterstored in the reservoir that may be related to natural discharge fromthe ground-water reservoir or, more commonly, to discharge from wells.

    1

  • 2 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    A rise indicates an increase in storage that may be related to above-normal recharge or) in a restricted area, to cessation of pumping. Water-level measurements made in January or February (before irrigation begins)are used in comparing the year-to-year net changes in water level andin preparing the maps showing water-level changes in the various areas.Water levels also were measured periodically during the year to determinethe seasonal fluctuation, if any, of the water table.

    Water levels were measured in 1,690 wells in January and February1959 and in 1,650 wells during the same period in 1960. About 1,970additional measurements of water level were made_ at intervals during1959 in 600 of the same wells measured in January and February. During1958 about 2,340 additional measurements were made in 605 of the samewells measured in January and February. Recording gages were maintainedon 33 of the seasonal wells to obtain detailed records of water-levelfluctuations. All measurements are given in feet above or below land-surface datum at the well, except the mean monthly and mean annual arte-sian heads in seven wells in the Roswell basin, which are given in feetabove mean sea level. Water levels in two observation wells in theVirden Valley in Hidalgo Gounty were measured by the Arizona office ofthe U. S. Geological Survey.

    The Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy District operated water-stagerecorders on 10 PVACD wells in the intake area of the Roswell basin in1959. The daily highest water levels in the 10 wells, collected and com-piled by the PVACD, appear in table 35A (P. 66 to 75).

    All water-level measurements taken each year before 1951 were pub-lished annually in the series of U. S. Geological Survey Water-SupplyPapers titled, ItWater Levels and Artesian Pressures in Observation Wellsin the United States in (year)." From 1951 through 1955, only the season-al measurements were pUblished in that series of annual reports. Since1955 the series of reports is being published in abbreviated form at 5-year intervals. The annual measurements from 1951 to 1955, omitted fromthe series of annual reports by the Geological Survey, were published ina summary report by the State Engineer as Technical Report 13. This re-port, TtAnnual Water-Level Measurements in Observation Wells, 1951-1955,and Atlas of Maps Showing Changes in Water Levels for Various Periodsfrom Beginning of Record Through 1954, New Mexico)" also includes a sum-mary text for the period of record through 1954 for the State and foreach area, hydrographs) and nearly all the maps of water-level changefor the period of record through 1954. The State Engineer began publi-cation of an annual water-level report starting with 1955 data. Thereport for 1~55 is similar to the U. S. Geological Survey Water-SupplyPaper, but it includes the annual measurements instead of the seasonalmeasurements of water level. The annual water-level reports publishedby the State Engineer for the years 1956, 1957, and 1958 include allmeasurements of water level along with the text and maps of water-levelchange. Beginning with 1959 data, all measurements of water levels andmaps of change are to be published each year; the summary text will beincluded at intervals of about 3 years.

  • INTRODUCTION 3

    Significance and Presentation of Data

    Annual Measurements

    Water levels are measured in many observation wells each Januaryor February in the main areas in New Mexico where ground water is usedfor irrigation. The wells are measured at a time of year when recoveryof water levels from pumping effects of the previous irrigation seasonis virtually complete -- therefore, at a time when comparison withwater levels of previous years is most significant. These winter meas-urements provide an index to the amount of ground water in storage and,when compared with measurements of other years, reflect changes in stor-age resulting from changes in recharge and discharge. The maps ofwater-level change are based on the annual (January or February) meas-urements of water level.

    The tables of the annual water-level measurements show the time ofrecord and list the water levels in January or February for all obser-vation wells, the change since the measurements of the preceding Januaryor February, and, for comparison, the highest and lowest recorded levelsduring January or February of past years.

    February measurements, if available, are used for years in whichobservation wells were not measured in January. If a measurement forany time other than· January or February is included, a footnote is addedstating the month.

    The lowest recorded water level, as pUblished for any given well,is one measured at a time when the well was not being pumped, exceptfor some wells that were being pumped by windmills and it could be de-termined that the water level was not lowered appreciably by the pump-ing. The year of beginning of record in this tabulation of annualmeasurements is the first year in which a January or February measure-ment was made. Records are missing for years when a January or Februarymeasurement was not made or when a water level was affected by pumpingto the extent that comparison with the previous yearts water levelwould be meaningless. However, because of the difficulty in determin-ing immediately if a water level affected by pumping is representative,the water-level measurement for- the present year will not be reportedmissing until the following year, if at that time it is still the low-est level. Even though a water-level measurement of a previous year isre~orted missing for some wells because of a low level resulting fromthe well being pumped, a yearly change will be given because of itsvalue in sho~ing the order of magnitude of the drawdown while the wellis being pumped.

    notations are needed to add meaning to the measurements,indicate pumping effects if determinable, footnotes haveThe footnotes have been kept as brief and few in number as

    A lower case letter is placed in the tabulation, where ne-Footnotes "a" through "m" have standard meanings throughout

    Wheresuch as tobeen used.possible.cessary.

  • Seasonal Measurements

    Well-Numbering System

    the report. Footnotes following "rn" are not standard but may have adifferent meaning from one table to another. Footnotes used and theirmeanings are listed at the end of each table.

    GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 19594

    For wells equipped with recording gages, daily water levels areincluded and are tabulated following the data for seasonal wells foreach area. The highest and lowest water levels of record for wellsequipped with recording gages are the highest and lowest of the dailyhigh levels taken from recorder graphs. This is to allow comparison ofthe water levels without the immediate effects of pumping. All measure-ments are given in feet above or below land-surface datum (lsd) at thewell unless stated as feet above mean sea level (msl).

    Figure I shows the abbreviated system of numbering wells in NewMexico which is based on the common subdivisions of public lands intosections. The system is used in all areas except for the thermal wellsin Truth or Consequences (the Hot Springs area), Sierra County. Forexample, well 12,36.24,342 in Lea County is located in the NE!SE!SW!sec. 24, T. 12 S., R, 36 E. The NE! is abbreviated as 2, the SE! as 4,and so on. Letters a, b, c., etc., are added to the last segment todesignate the second, third, fourth, and succeeding wells in the same10-acre tract. If a well is located only to the 40-acre tract, the 10-acre tract number is therefore given as 0; for example 13.37.25.120.

    The highest and lowest water levels of record and the period ofrecords available are included With the current seasonal water-levelmeasurements for each well. water levels in prior years, if any, inwells that have not been reported previously, also are included hereinat the end of each section and are noted by an asterisk in the table ofseasonal measurements. The highest and lowest levels recorded duringthe period of measurement are listed for comparison. The highest andlowest levels listed with the seasonal measurements are not necessarilythe same as those listed with the annual measurements but are the high-est and lowest of all measurements available. As far as could be de-termined, the lowest recorded level as published for a well is a static,or nonpumping, level, except for some wells that were being pumped bywindmills at a negligible rate. The year of beginning of record in thistabulation of seasonal measurements is the year in which the first meas-urement, seasonal or annual, was recorded.

    In addition to measurements in January or February, selected wellsare measured, generally at 2- to 4-month intervals, in order to noteseasonal changes in water levels caused by precipitation and pumpingand to aid in interpreting the yearly net changes in water levels.

  • INTRODUCTION 5

    In a county such as Roosevelt County, where wells are situated intownships both north and south of the base line, the letter N is addedto the first segment of the well number if the well is north of thebase line, but no letter is added if the well is south of the base line.Similarly, in a county where wells are located in ranges both east andwest of the meridian, the letter E is added to the second segment ofthe well number of those wells east of the meridian. In counties lyingentirely within one quadrant of the principal meridian and base line,the direction north or south of the base line or east or west of themeridian is not given.

    The designation of a well location is not to be considered the ab-solute location, as many section lines were not accurately surveyed byinstrument at the time of designating the well number.

    A modification of this system has been used for wells on grantland in Sunshine Valley in Taos County where land was sectionized ac-cording to a system used in Colorado and extended into New Mexico.Within the Sangre de Cristo Grant, townships south of the State linehave been designated T. 1 S., and T. 2 S., whereas those north of theline are designated T. IN., etc.

    Sectlone "llhln II Townehlp

    R 36 E

    Trocte wUhln II aection

    Sea. 24

    ·1

    /"-1-1--2;4--';'1-~-l

    I

    ~

    Well 12. 36.24.342

    FIGURE 1. -- System of numbering wells in New Mexico.

    6 3 4 \3 2 I

    7 II 9 l~ 'I 12'\19 17 III 15 iV" 13

    " 22 ~3 1!4.~ 20 21 .129"

    Wall

    30 20 21 26 23

    31 32 ;3'-~4 33 \6I, 6 mile:r.

    ~

    T.12S

  • R.?8 E. -;./ / ;0;-~>-7"'>..... R.2'9 E. EXPLANATION(./ // / ;.~tr(/ 'A . Observation wellOR Observation well with recorderT. ;// IY.. / ·2.1 X/ A -.. Line showing rise (+) or decline (-)6 ...~/ / />.'" / --'. ~ • f.-~>;,/ / ' lr /~\ /T. House. / / ..,5 1/ / / 1/// V ...,{ / 1/ '>Or- / /~N. /// -- "// / / / / ~ //. .//

    / /// / / / //~/ / "'f7z~:-0f / V //1/ . /"C .,~[)!\ ./ //, ./ / / / / 1/ / / / ,/ /;/ ~r-"~1/ /~/ / /- V / /' 1/ / / / / /1/ / _._

    FIGURE 2. Cbcnge of ground.water level from January 1959 to January 1960 In the H08so or.., Quay County, N. M.x.

  • HOUSE AREA, QUAY COUNTY

    Table l.--WATER LEVELS nI ROUSE AREA, QUAY COUNTY, H. 1>1ID:., JANUARY 196o}HIGHEST MID LOWEST RECORDED LEVELS m JAi."'WARY OR FEBRUARY, In FEEl' BELOH LAND-SURFACE DATUM,

    MID CF.ANGE FROM: JANUARY 1959 TO JAllUARY 1S'60, III FEEl'

    7

    !Ii ATE R LEVELS "' ,~ ., nLocation

    ~arne Januarv 1 Change irr .,. ~ "D Yearsnumber Level Day 1959-60 Level IYesr Level Year

    EeganmissinJ7.

    5.28.1.221 ,. Loyd Harvey 57·48 20 '1·07 46.93 ! 47 57.48 ! 60 475.29·2.131 o. G. Miller 26.77 20 +1.62 23.141 50 029.59157 48

    4.333 State of New Hexico 50.12 21 , .59 36.67 50 50.12 60 50

    ~.~~1 S. E. Morris 71.~~ 20' .66 48.68 44 71.32 60 44

    .12 W. D. CA-rt'lenter 68.0 20 - .Q, 42.76 i 47 68.09 , 60 47 555·321 S. E. />lorris - I - - ,0.70 I ~b b7.71 I 50 ~~

    I bO5.341 W. H. Coker 58 •291 20 - .38 29·73 i 43 58.29 , 605.342 db. 56.68 20 - .16 30.1511~3 56.68 ! 60 41t~tt

    S. E. Morris 65:21i 20 - .25 ~U; 43 65.21 60 43 53M1's. F. I. Austin - - 2.4 44 42.08 So 44 606.222 * W. D. Carpenter 79.311 20 -2.57 52.371 47 79.36 60 466.422 db. 64.29 20 -1.33 36.24 45 64.29 60 45 53,577·142 D. L. Birch 35.271 20 -1.71 14.31 42 35.27 I 60 41~.221 Tom Ledbetter

    ,8:401- - 25.491 42 46.83 , 59 42 60

    .242 Nettie Hendricks 20 -1.70 18.44 44 38.40 60 448.114 J. C. Davenport - - - 22.75 I ~2 "0.2b 59 .1 608.232 * G. W. Turner 55·70 21 - .84 34.19 43 55·70 60 428.412 J. D. Kitchens 45·67 21 -1.01 27·94 43 45.67 60 42 54

    ~:~;~aw. W. Dwight 48.21 21 - .84 32.03 45 48.21 60 45 54

    * J. R. Gollehon '0.08 21 - 21." 42 '0.08 60 42 48 40.51 53-5550,59

    13·131 Cecelia Mae Barron 61.65 21 +6.15 56.80 45 67.80 59 41 5613.234 N. C. Leathenmod 55.60 21 - .62 50.22 48 55.60 60 4513.412 Cecelia Mae Barron 52.76 21 +7·37 46.61 43 55.66 "6 41 55,5914. '21 Annie Horton - - - 00.55 4, 41.05 '0 45 48.56 6015.311b • db. 24.87 21 - .43 17·91 43 24.87 60 4315.331 do. 37·54 21 +6.43 34.48 45 39.65 58 43 47,52-54,5917.133 • w. W. Kuykendall 47·54 28 - .75 >29·68 1 42 47·70 55 4117 ·331 J. W. Witherspoon 50.15 20 - 32·92 42 50.31 57 41 5918.22' J. and M. C. Wriltht 45.07 20 - .81 31.89 ' 45 45.9'7 60 4518.233 s. E. !>lorris 50·90 20 - .05 45.74 42 , m59· 70 I 55 41 5318.243 db. 47 .39 1 20 + .67 34.83 I 45 48.55 I 58 "518.434 .ll- A. O. Norris 61.10 20 + .23 53·70 50 62.79 55 4820.131b A. G. Paschall

    55:491- - 48·79 43 61.73 59 43 60

    20.4"b H. E. Stutts 21 - ·35 k46.99 43 55.49 60 4123·121 Bruce Runyan 26. 691 21 -1.60 23·63 57 26.69 60 5423·222a I-l!' R. L. Davis and others , 33.92

    1 21 - .44 30.10 50 33.92 60 4927·112 * E. D. Go11ehon 71.991 21 - ·31 70.55 52 71.99 60 4729·111 !-\(. C. A. Morrow 71. 281 21 - ·31 65.91 43 ~:28 60 41,6.242 State of New Mexico 04.04- 20 .00 Ql•. 04 n50 .28 42 42 43-46 49

    5.30.18.314 I, H. C. and H. J. Lee ! ~t§~i 21 - .45 39.73 1 ~~ 40.~ ~~ ~~18.331 l* do. I 21 + ·98 34.80 48.2819.132b Ralph Hendricks i 32.87: 21 - .27 28.94 ' 51 32.87 I 60 51,19:m J do. 23·03: 21 - .56 15 .94 1 42 23·03 I 60 4220. 3a I·ll- Bruce Murohv a29·52i 21 + .15 26.52 54 1129.67 I 59 5431.442 ,* T. W. Coleman 99·""1 21 - .01 "".79, 51 99.77! ~. ~~6.28.1.232 1* State bf New Mexico 66.641 21 - .26 65.72 i 57 66.88 5213·333 Ollie Dameron 107 .621 21 + .04 100.47 i 48 109.40 I 57 48;~:;~~

    L. E. Upton 113:271 28 -1.06 106.95 ! 54 113.27 60 542 .2 S. E. Hobbs - - 96.77 56 98.55 58 56 6023·312 I. G. db. - I - - 90 .56 1 54 104.10 56 54 6024.233 B. Irwin 89.57, 21 - .25 78.12 45 90.51 58 4525·411 R. A. Davenport

    65:741- - 52.20 45 65·90 57 44 60

    6.29.19·313 T. J. Coston 28 -2.11 53·50 46 65.74 60 4627."2 w. K. Keroo '45.93 20 -1.48 43.44 S2 ,45.03 60 4529·331 J. D. Smith Jr. 100.62 21 -3.39 105.4? 56 111.44 56 5630.112 * E. G. Heine 60.27 21 - ·90 48.08 43 60.27 60 1

  • 8 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Table 2.--SEASONAL WATER LEVELS IN WELLS If! HOUSE l\HEA, QUAY COUNTY, N. MEX., III 1959, MID HIGHESTArm LOWEST RECORDED LEVELS, IN FEET DELe"l LAND-SURFACE DATU;';

    Location 5·28.1.221 5.29.6.222 5.29.8.232 5·29·9·421 5·2g.15·311bName Loyd Harvey 11. D. Carpenter G. H. Turner J. R. Gollehon Annie HortonRecord 1946-59 19115-59 1941-59 1941-59 1942-59Highest Nar. 1946 46.63 Har. 1946 51·51 Feb. I ~lar. 19+3 Jan. 1942 21·33 Sept. 1942 17 .52

    Sent. 1957 Sept. 1958 Sent. lq5934.19

    Sept. 1950 Sent. 19,QLowest 64.53 79.60 57.45 44.98 24.161959 Jan. 22 50.41 Jan. 21 70·79 Jan. 21 5 ." Har. ~D a52.~ Jan. 21 2'-44Levels Sept. 21 79·17 Sept. 18 57. 115 June 8 8.54.62 Nar. 16 24.51

    Sept. 18 44.98 June 8 23.89Sept. 18 2~.7~

    Location 5·29·17.133 5.29.18.434 5.29. 23.2228. 5·29·27·112 5·29·29·111N=. W. W. Kuykendall A. O. Norris R. L. Davis and E. D. Go11ehon C. A. HorrO'

  • Table 3.--Well 5.29.17.133. W. W. Kuykendall. Drilled unused water table well in OGallala formation, dieJn12 in, depth 57 ft. Lsd is 4,740 ft above msl. HiGhest water level 29.:32 below lsd, Jan. 21,1942; lowest 48.24 below lsd, Oct. 30-31, 1954. Records available 1941-59.

    Daily hiGhest water level from recorder Graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.1 46.94 46.75 40.07 4'7.32 47.36 47.60 47.JO 47·92 47.J7 47.91 47.942 46.94 46.73 46.89 47.33 47.37 47.69 47.79 h47.76 4'r .93 47.8d 47·91 47.943 4(,.94 46.73 46.91 47.34 47.30 47.69 47.79 47.77 47.93 47.89 47·91 47.934 46.93 46.73 46.92 47.34 47.39 47.70 47.79 47.77 47.92 47·90 47.92 47.935 46.92 46."r4 46.94 47.35 47. 40 47.71 47.73 47.79 47.92 47.90 47.93 elf7.936 e46.91 46.74 46·96 47.36 47.41 47.72 47.7g 47.00 47.92 47·91 47.93 e47.937 e46.90 46.74 46.98 47.36 47.42 47."{2 47.80 47.81 47.92 47.91 47.94 47.920 4' qn 46.73 47.37 47. 43 47.73 47.80 47.81 4'7.91 47.91 47·94 if7.92iJ.Ov9 46.88 46.73 47.05 47.37 47. 44 47.73 47.80 47.82 47.91 47.92 47·94 47.90 0::

    10 46.87 46.73 47.06 47.37 47.45 47.74 47.80 47.33 47.91 47.92 47.95 47.90 0c:11 46.07 46.73 47.00 47.37 47.46 47.74 47.83 47·90 47.93 4r ·95 47.90 Ul'"12 46.36 46.73 47.09 47.33 47.46 47.74 47.85 47.90 47·93 47·96 47.90 :>-13 46.85 46.73 47.11 47.38 47. 46 47.74 47.85 47.86 47.89 47.94 47·96 if7.83 '"'"14 46.84 46.73 47.12 47.38 47. 47 47.75 47.85 47·89 47.89 47·93 47.97 47.dS :>--15 46.83 46.73 47.14 47.37 47.48 ~7.75 4"{ .85 47.07 47.88 47.94 47.97 lf7 .I:ld iD16 e46.81 46.73 47.15 47.37 47.51 47.76 47.8~ 47.88 47.88 47·92 47·97 47.87 $i17 46.80 49·73 47.17 47.37 47.51 47.77 47.3 47.88 47.87 47.92 47.97 47.87 ><10 46.79 46.73 47.18 47.36 47.52 47.77 47.84 47·90 47.87 47.92 47.97 47.85 0019 46.79 46.74 47.18 47.53 47.78 47.83 47.90 47.86 47.91 47.97 47. 85 c:z20 46.79 46.75 47.18 47.39 47.55 47.'78 47.82 47.89 47.85 47.91 47.97 47.84 "">

  • 10 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    en«X

    W

    I-

    R.36 E.COUNTY

    R.35E.ROOSEVELT

    R.34 E.

    R. 34 E. ~Gradv R. 35 E. R.36E. BellviewI'

    STATE HWY 16 Broadview STAT! H\lIY 93!l 241

    ~ EXPL ANt, T I ON I1

    - 0.60339:2

    Observof,on well; change in waler levelio feet, depth to water in feet belowland-surface datum

    r0 I 2 3 4 5 Milu II I I 1 I I -4.6

    "TI5:2

    o~ I311.6, .. >"""'".- ......-~ Clement I

    " ......rlf', ..~.,:-""''v.

    f-........... .....,. ..."-.. .. ,......... " ... ~.r--...., .. -..-

    ' ........,.t......r---.,

    IT. ....... '.........'-.,5 ~

    ..,"'"'-.,

    ~~jN. >-'"::t:w xI...;! ....±..'..:.Q, w,'" 3,82,7 ::E

    .......o...=QJ! ~I\""'" 339.2

    '~'-'. I\.....---." Wj

    '''V-"

    ~I'""-.,,,

    "'''\.'',,--1.4.."-"."'\-.,, 02B8,7 ~o

    ""236.4

    '._...-f'" PleasantI

    ''\,.'. ~"'"v"

    IHill

    .."'..... :'0.9,."-".\...'.........

    hr.,.......... 206.B

    ~RonChVaJe 0-.:±1 -1.0"'\.·'......··"--1

    324.9 u 298.8 I-4.1

    o 274.5

    -0.2 -1.4 ....::b1..034i':O °mT 265.3 0I

    103i6.9 -2.2 I0'279.2 o 254.6~~I

    fil:°2;g

    -2.8 IJrier o~

    u. S. HWY eo a 84 Portair p,':'~.. " -2.2 fI',l': 204.3 IA r & '>1" 60 70 E/;0,:1: [7-- 64 Texico-0.70 242.6 -0.1 ~ A T a- h'm-:e

    0-198.1

    I, .±.Q,l

    o....::.Q:1.I216.7 +0.2 -1.0 -1.3

    i67.5 g,68.2 017'3:5 190.1... I" !!; ,.."_O_d'> ~ -0.6164.6

    ,.. :r ° 162.0"1: iii

  • WATE R LEVEf·S "''''''' nLoce.t10n Nc.me J"m",,'''' 1Q60 Change if' ~"an. T~U6. Bege.n Yearo

    nUlllber Level Dav 19.,q: 60 Level Year Level Year m1oo1=

    1.'2.7·'00 " A. B. Crenohav 18.47 4 +0.46 14.93 43 1118.93 59 32 581. 33 .16.112 R. L. Simpoon 27.76 28 +1.09 20.00 42 28.85 59 42

    16.131 do. 29·24 28 - .36 23.26 50 29.24 60 481.35.1.312 J. W. Patteroon 164.63 15 - .02 nl62.26 54 164.68 58 541.~6.4.41' H. W. Mart1n 182.02 15 - .84 179·09 56 198.8, ~5 54

    5.211 J. E. Wall mf.17 15 - ·97 nlb3.211 54 16~.17 00 $46.121 .. R. W. !lyman 167·53 15 + .18 164.60 54 167.88 58 5412·313 C. c. C\u'ry 178.16 15 - ·37 171.70 54 178.16 60 54 5516.111 .. H. E. Hathorn 157·15

    i~+2.98 156.56

    ~~160.13

    ~~54

    1.37.16.422 " Sam II.eLarty Eotate 146.76 + .Q.; 1~6.78 147.71 ~42.31.1.211 Alex Tindle -86.16 28 + .12 85·58 56 86·57 5/j 56

    1·311 Ernest Cooper 69.34 28 - .26 67·38 56 69.34 60 542.l22 Hugh Warren - - - 64.51 56 66.30 57 54 60

    2.,4.36.222 Mro. Martha Dorrie 216.70 15 + .14 214.14 54 218.14 57 ~~ ~~2.'35.4.'311 J. R. Vivian - - - 1)295.49 54 306.98 58 6021.221 M. R. Bla.ck~urn 242.1)1 15 - ·73 240.20 50 2114.65 58 5624.121 E. H. Chick 24,.81 15 - .08 2'9·05 54 243.81 60 54

    2.36.11.111a .. H. S. Holland 254.24 15 -3·70 248.32 58 254.24 60 5814.441 " W. W. Bol1llU' - - 230.04 55 239.63 59 ~~ 56,6016.211 G. M. Murtlhv 24'3.24 15 - o22'l.;H 54 243.24 60 t;Q"23·222 H. a. Holland w - - 0226.20 54 231)·53 58 54 59,6027.122 LeVege. Peteroon 198.14 15 - nl90.80 54 198·14 60 54 5934.311 B. a. Albright 1'73.53 15 -1.34 167.55 54 In·53 60 54 56

    2.37·7·211 L. A. Pearce 248.50 15 -2.82 0230.34 54 248·50 60 540.'321 " Gene Lovelace 204.28 It; -2.22 nlOl.Go

  • 12 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Tnble 5. --SEASONAL WATER LEVELS IN WELLS IN CLOVIS AREJ\, CURRY comITY, N. MEX., IN 1959,.AND HIGHEST AND LOWEST RECORDED LEVELS, III FEET BELOW LAlID-SURFACE DATUH

    Location 1.32.7.300 1.36.6.121 1. 36.16.111 1.37 .16 .l~22 2.36 .11.111aName A. B. Crenshaw R. W. llyman H. E. Hathorn Sam McLarty Estate H. S. HollandRecord 1931-59 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59 1958-59Highest lolay 1944 14.68 Feb. 1954 164.60 Feb. 1954 156·56 Feb. 1954 136 .78 Jan. 1958 248.32Lowest July 1940 18.89 June 1q59 170.13 Sent. N57 162.51 sent. 1959 151.87 June lCl59 257.471959 Jan. 6 aHl.93 Jan. 11} 167.71 Jan. 11 160.13 Jan. 14 147·71 Jan. 19 250.54Levels Mar. 11 a19·21 June 9 170.13 Mar. 17 b161.02 June 9 146.88 Mar. 17 251.06

    June 8 al9.40 Sept. 17 168.63 June 9 161.01 Sept. 17 151.87 June 9 257.47Sept. 21 820.35 Sept. 17 161.40

    Location 2.36.14.441 2.37.9.321 2.37.22.433 3.34.23.433 3.35.26.112 *Name W. W. Bomar Gene Lovelace Dr. F. E. Seale Monte Matlock Vora L. HartleyRecord 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59Highest Jan. 1955 230.04 Mar. 1954 191.90 Nov. 1954 191.01 Mar. 1957 ~~.62 Nov. 1954 ~?17Lowest Julv 1956 245.88 &rot. IGS9 205.\0 sent. IG59 201.'17 Nov. lQi;i; 1.09 Sent. lQ58 4.101959 Jan. 14 239.63 Jan. 15 202.06 Jan. 11} 199·64 Jan. 13 340.82 Jan. 19 355·69Levels Mar. 17 bc243.00 Mar. 17 b202.80 Mar. 17 c199·75 Mar. 17 340.82

    Sept. 17 m229·30 June 9 204.67 June 9 201.50 June 9 340.86Sept. 17 205.30 Sept. 17 201.97 Sept. 17 341.00

    Location 3.36.27.413 4.36.10.111 6.36.35.122 7.37.32.131Name C. H. Moore- O. E. Patterson Paul Harrison R. H. Potts

    Oliver Co.Record 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59 1954-59Highest Jan. 1955 286.05 July 1954. 328.37 Mar. 1954 300.55 Jan. 1955 224.54Lowest June 1958 304.11 Nov. 1956 345.82 June 1959 313.32 Mav 19

  • R. 36 E.R. 35 E.

    f/ /!/t;/....// 7~ / /'; /'" /:/1/ '/)/A/I/k! !//}:)10;:::'r7

  • 14 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW .mXICO, 1959

    Table 6.--WATER LEVELS IN PORTALES VA1JE!, ROOSEVELT com1TY, N. HEX., IN JANUARY 15)60,HIGfWT A1ID LOHEST RreORDEJ) LEVELS D1 JAMJARY OR FEBRUARY, TIl FEE!' BELOH WID-SURFACE DATUM,

    AIm CHANGE FRrn JAMJARY 1959 TO JANUARY 1960 TIl' FEEl'

    W ATE R LEVELS ,Location Jll.nun

    ~~~~eYearnriMe Began

    nl1rnb~r Level Dav 1 5 -60 Level Year Level Year minoinuUi.32.27.333 Carl Eaoary 40.4; 7 -0.25 39.63 r57 40.43 60 57

    30.421 L. R. Hannnond 64.99 7 + .24 57·95 47 66.10 57 4732.133 Virgie Hawkinn 76.19 7 + .25 65.Jn 47 76.J~I~ 59 4734.333 Robert T. UE!\ffi!M 52.11 7 - .49 42.88 ~~ 52:~; ~~ ~ '8-60'6.24' state of New Mexico - - - 40.00 41.

    1N,".26.120 J. L. Baldwin Eatnte 17-42 29 - 3·5- 42 17.4~ 60 39 43,50,51,5932.443 Chao. Wa.11 47·76 6 - .83 :;o.gr 50 47.76 60 4936.400b Woodburn Braa. 821.8; 13 -4.24 1·98 42 021.8; 60 32 31,:;836.4000 • do. 15:~ ~~ -1.~~ 9.~ 54 15.~~

    60~~IN.'4.',.>>4 J. L. Bnldwin E'Btate 026. - .1 10. 42 826.0 60 ".'4.'8

    35·432. FArl McCollum 024.61 14 - .28 b19·29 51 ~4.~1 60 491.31.1.222 '* W. O. Weeks 89·52 7 -8.49 74.98 47 89·52 60 45 57,581.32.2.431 G. W. Terry nnd 80M 41.49 7 -1.08 27.88 49 41.49 60 49

    3·J~31 * M. Nnll ~§:;!; ~-2.ce 36.~~ ~~ ~§:;!;

    60~~ "MO10.'" J. R. Mead01lB - 45.2 60

    13·413 L. L. Bagwell 57.43 7 -1. n ~0.23 51 57-43 60 5114.431 * Robert Morrison 62.13 7 -1.32 43.63 45 62.13 60 45

    1.33.1.342 Woodburn Dros. 53.82 13 -1.31 38.95 49 53. 82 60 49 52,53,552·331 Letho. Burson 58.06 7 - ·55 31.15 ;~

    58.06 60;~

    564.242 J. R. stanley 61.24 6 -1.

  • PORTALES VALLEY, ROOSEVELT COUNTY

    Table 6.--WATER LEVELS TIt PORTAI,]S VAI.J..EY 1 ROOSEVELT COONTYJ IN JAmJARY 1950 - Continued

    15

    W ATE R LEVELSLocation "M. Janua Change YearnnUlllber Level D;;; 1Q59-60 Level Year Level Year Began misBirux

    1.j4.27.21la A. N. Tiffin 72.36 8 -2.27 59·26 55 72·36 60 5527·331n G. A. Whitmire - - - 39·10 48 67·51 59 48 6027 ..331b do. 69.06 8 -1.29 63.58 57 69·06 60 57~~:341n D. Harrie ~~::

    8 -L;~ 54.;~ 54 ~~::60

    ~i ~~2 .412 J. E. PIUllllller 8 -1. 5 20.1 42 6028.111 P. W. Jenkins 70.55

    ~-2.94 15.

    ;~70·55 60 42

    28.133b Floyd Rudd 71.85 -2·39 57·85 7L85 60 5528.211b Joe Enton - - · 40.45 49 70.60 59 49 60;;:111 J. D. Sossaman 72:"" - ..:.. 60.~~ ~~ ~~:;,~ 59 ~~ 602 .2110. C. H. Stevena 8 64.8 2. 4 6030.111 * F. L. Corder 67.33 7 -2.65 4t· 5 ~; ~T·33 ~O ~~31.222 Clint Fnlrlay 63.62 6 -3·17 3 .55 63.62 6033·2230. * Portales Municipal - - · 28.84 46 60.63 59 46 60'4.14'

    Airport4' 66.00 ;0 "Arvel Branscomb Meaeurem nt di continued 24.00 426031~.143a do. 67·Ch 29 - ·95 59·75 55 67' Ch 60 55

    34.234a J. W. Orlena - - - 48.44 52 64.75 59 52 6036.44; Eastern N. Mex. - - - 19·;7 42 69.45 59 35 60

    L".2.'00Unlveraity

    + .47 43.52 48·07 '6• do • 46.07 14 44 405·212 J. R. Carver - · - 27·01 51 29·93 59 49 606.400 * J. C. Brcnm 17·23 14 . ·37 5.24 42 17.23 60 3211.241 * A. Hobbs EGtate 19.06 14 - .17 14.03 43 19·06 60 4119·2410. R. M. Pember 58.62 9 - .~~ ~I'~~ ~~ 58.62 60 i~"7.,,4 * Lo:wson Reed 46.04 8 -1. .2 46.04 6028.143' * Travis Culpepper 62.65 5 -1.1:11 58·90 55 62.65 60 5529·111 J. W. Killam - · · 35.26 4, 62.64 59 40 6029.142 R. E. Lee 65.97 8 -2.22 33·15 43 65·97 60 35'0.111 v. C. Gibson 71.90 ~

    -1.88 ~,:~~ ~;, 7L9O60

    ~~57

    ~i.ll1o. A. G. Kenvon -n.21 -2.88 -n.21 60'1.122 W. G. Kenyon 72.45 9 -1.25 22.00 4i

    72.45 60 35 52,5631.3310. Ophane Chr1£ltion 73.17 9 -3·09 34.31 73.17 60 47 5832·111 Alvin George 65.02 9 -1.83 19.65 43 65.02 60 35 37

    ~~:;~Gilbert MCAlioter 57·25 8 -2.43 ;~.45 43 57.;; ~g ~~. 2. 11 Orvll Dosk - - - 1 .41 42 64.2 60

    32.332 do. - - · 17·12 42 63·05 59 ,6 37,56AO1.36.5.300 Coldvater Cattle Co. · · · 32.84 43 ,6.01 41 40 49,57-60

    16.100 state of New Mexico · - - b18.40 45 a33·10 54 40 46,57-602·33·5.113 'If H. S. Deen ~~:35 6 : :~; ~~.49 ~~ ~~.;5 60 ~~ ;;:i~6.224 F. C. Russell 6 .00 6 .80 6 .00 60

    7.2410. John Morgan '52.9'5~

    - .65 46.65 53 52·95 60 539·221 J. B. Onstatt 58.11 -1.20 52·53 56 58.11 60 56

    2·34.1.133 Roy Radcliff 64.45 9 -5·94 18.18 42 64.45 60 352.233 * Louisa Trout 74.~ 11 'L~~ k3;.,;';' ~~

    74·38 60 ;~ "4.111 C. B. "libel 48. 11 -2. 1 24. 0 48.08 606.1120. B. E. Small 55.4C 29 -2.56 53.34~~

    55.40 60 5810.343 1014 Estelle Jones ,9-77 11 - ·50 32.25 39·77 60 3510.431 * B. G. Polk 48.02 11 -1.20 30·92 51 48.02 60 5111.122 E. J. Weer - ; .,:8' ;~.20 42 J55.~~ 59 ~~ 57,58,60Pi.1". L. J. Sanders 42.45 1.08 55 42.4 6014.1130. H: D. Jones 50.~~ 11 -2.60 31.10 .0 50.15 60 4514.4,4a "l. A. Shaffer J51.4 9 -L59 43.08 55 J51.47 60 55

    2.35.4.111a E. S. Weber - - 42.43 56 5L58 59 56 60Ut' J. M. Sanders ~~:;:: 14 .2.;( 12.87 42 ;i:: 60 ~i• 41 w. R. Tavior ,4 -1. 13.45 42 60~.121a * Dallas Clark 70·3 9 -2"'7 5!f.66 56 70·34 60 566.411 "l. E. Bowen 63·1 14 -2.34 14.25 42 63·11 60 39 566.4438. J. A. Vandevender 56.56 14 -2.27 29·26 51 56·56 60 487·11; J. 0. Spink£l 50·3 14 -2.64 33·03 54 i~';O ~g ;~8."" Leonard Fe~~£lon - - - 18.28 42 2.08 ",.609·122 * B. J. POWell · · - 20.2l:1 51 42.66 59 4~ 609·333 M. B. Rogers 50.4 11 -L64 23.60 45 50.45 6010.211 C. R. Lee J3L7 14 . ·93 10·30 42 J31. 71 60 4010.432 C. E. Clark - - - 22.~ ~~

    29·46 ;g 55 6014.414 Nut Nat. Bank Mea13ure nt d continue +. 6.46 40

  • 16 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Table 6.--wlITER LEVELS IN PORI'ALES VALLEY, ROOSEVELT CamTY, Dr JANUARY 1960 - Continued

    W ATE R LEVELSLocation

    Name Janua 1 ~:;~e Yearsnumber Level Dov 1 -60 Level Year Level YearBegan

    m160ina

    2.36·7.332 G. C. ROSB 26.64 13 -1.21 15.87 51 26.64 60 458.4320. s. W. Davia 26·37 13 - 17·60 52 26.37 60 49 599·J~31 H. C. Crosby 24.43 13 - .50 15.67 43 24.43 60 39~.424 * ~e~. ~;:~.~~1 - 1; - 39·07 53 l~l.lO 59 53 601 .111a 24.06 - .63 20·16 55 24.06 60 55i8.311 Robert Stokes 22.62 11 -l.24 10.74 51 22.6~ 60

    ~~19·131 * F. H. stokeD ,30.01 11 + .27 16·93 42 30.28 5921.432 H. J. tolcCrnry - - - 10·39 43 25.82 59 39 42,6025:.~la W. D. Pate 23.69

    i~- .14 20·55 55 23·97 57 ~~26. 11 J. S. R!l~" 24.24 - .60 5.09 42 24.24 60

    26.423 T. E. Payne 25.1J4 13 +1.02 ".15 42 26.ll6 59 35 3",3927·31180 H. J. McCroary - - - 12.79 51 27·01 59 48 57,6028.113 C. E. Clark 29·19 11 - - - - - 60~n~~~ do. Meaeurem nt dl conti~ed k7·37 ~~

    26.33 59 ~~60

    8.4 a C. A. Tevis 28.88 14 -l. 21.66 28.88 6028.4210 do. 30.43 14 -l."7 23·3" 55 30.43 60 5534.111a D. J. Patton 29·72 14 -1.52 14.06 51 29·72 60 4834.312 L. W. Walker 29·55 14 -2.49 14.36 51 29·55 60 48~~.~l2b * Mrs. Ellnice Harriaon 20.66 13 - .24 18.79 ~~

    20.66~~ ~~. 11n Roxie V. Se''':';~ur - - - 2l.·" 22.4'7 60

    2.37.19·331a R. L. Gill 26·53 13 - .05 17·17 53 26·53 60 5320·311 R. F. Ledbetter 25·13 13 - ·35 18.63 53 25·13 60 5321.312a B. R. Tate 19.60 13 - .25 16.76 55 19.60 60 54~.344 H. D. Ward 22.18

    i~+ .48 16.49 54 822.66 59 ~~ 1,42 .112 a22.40 -1.12 16.63 53 822.40 60

    2S:112 H. c. Nickels 12.45 13 -1.25 10.16 55 12.45 60 53 5629.131 B. R. Tate 25.45 13 + .21 20.14 53 25.66 59 5330.134 • H. c. Nickels 29.62 13 + ·51 15.49 52 30.13 59 50 5531.111 J . H. Bradley 18.40 13 - .45 13·32 55 18.40 60 53

    Additional measurements and other data for this 'Well are liBted in following tabulation of seasonal measurements ordaily records of 'Water level.

    a. Pumping.b. Pumped recently.f. Dry.J. Possible discrepancy of a fev tenths of a foot between present and previous land-surface datum.k.. From recorder graph.p. March.r. Alao 1958.

  • PORTALES VALLEY, ROOSEVELT COUNTY

    Table 1.--SEASONAL WATER LEVELS IN 'HELLS TIl PORTALES VALLEY, ROOSEVELT COmiTY, n. ~JEX., ill 1959,AND HIGHEST AND LOWEST RECORDED LEVELS, IN FEE'r BELOW LAND-SURFACE DATlJl.l

    17

    Location 111.33. 36. 400c 1.31.1.222 1.52.3.431 ~1-f~4;~-'~ 1.33·10.312name Woodbuxn Bros. W. O. Weeks M. nall Robert l·lorril.lon j,lonroe MitchellRecord 1944-59 1948-59 1944-59 1956-59Highest Hay 1947 Z~:81 Bar. 1949 55.98 Apr. 1945 45.55 Jan. 1956 ;0.61Lowest Se:;"t. lOSS .02 Sent. 10

  • Table 8.--Well IN.33.36.400c. Woodburn Brothers. Drilled observation water-table well in valley fill,diam 8 in, depth 43 ft, cased to 40, perforated 8 - 40. Highest water level 7.88 below lsd, >-'Apr. 9, 1953; lowest 15·56 below lsd, Sept. 30, 1959. Records available 1953-59. 00

    Daily highest water level froID recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 14.21 14.33 14.37 14.43 14.54 14.79 14·98 15.12 15.33 15.54 15.43 15.372 14.22 14.30 14.38 14.43 14.55 14.80 14.98 15·13 15.33 15·51 15.42 15.373 14.23 14.31 14.38 14.43 14.55 14.77 14·98 15·13 15·35 15.50 15.42 15.384 14.23 14.32 14.39 14.43 14.55 14.74 14.97 15·15 15·35 15.45 15.45 15.405 14.23 1l;·31 14.40 14.42 14.57 14.67 14.97 15.16 15.36 15.42 15.43 15.39 06 14.23 14.31 14.39 111. 43 14.56 14.63 14·94 15.18 15·37 15.40 15.42 15.38 "07 14.24 14.31 14.39 14.44 14.59 14.60 14.83 15.20 15.39 15·39 15.41 15.40 c:S8 14.24 14.32 14.39 14.44 14.55 14.60 14.75 15.22 15·39 15.40 15.41 15.41 I9 14.25 14.35 14.38 14.47 14.55 i4.62 14.71 15.22 15.40 15.39 15.39 15.40 ~10 14.25 14.34 14.39 14.45 14.56 14.64 14.69 15.23 15.41 15.40 15.40 15.

    U3 ""11 14.25 14.34 14.39 14.44 14.57 14.67 14.70 15.24 15. 41 15.41 15.41 "15.12 14.26 14.34 14.39 14.43 14.58 14.72 14.75 15·25 15.42 15·39 15.41 15.40 li;;13 14.26 14.34 14. 110 14.43 14.59 14.74 14.75 15.26 15.42 15.41 15.43 15.40 ;;j14 14.26 14.34 14.40 14.43 14.60 14.77 14.81 15.27 15.43 15.38 15.40 15.40 t"''"15 14.27 111.35 14.40 14.43 14.62 14.79 14.85 15.27 15.43 15.38 15.39 15.42 H16 14.27 14.35 14.39 14.44 14.61 14.81 14.87 15.27 15.45 15.39 15.42 15.41 z

    17 14.28 14.35 14.40 14.45 14.60 14.82 14·90 15·27 15.45 15.42 15.40 15.42 z""18 14.28 14.35 14.42 14.45 14.62 14.84 14·91 15.27 15.46 15.41 15.40 15.40 '"19 14.28 14.36 14.40 14.46 14.63 14.85 14.95 15·29 15.47 15.41 15·39 15.39 [!;j20 14.29 14.36 14.42 14.46 14.65 14.87 14.96 15·29 15.48 15.42 15.40 15.39

    XH

    14.29 14.36 14.41 14.46 14.67 14.87 15.49 15.43(0

    21 15·01 15·29 15.39 15·39 0-22 14.29 14.36 14.41 14.47 14.67 14.88 15·01 15·29 15.49 15.43 15.39 15·3914.29 14.36 14.41 14.47 14.70 14.88 15·02 15.30 15.43 15·39

    f-"23 15·51 15·39 "'24 14.28 14.37 14.41 14.47 14.67 14.89 15·03 15.44 15.39 15.41 '"15·29 15.51 "'25 14.29 14.36 14.41 14.48 14.69 14.90 15.04 15.29 15.52 15.44 15.39 15.4326 14.28 14.36 14.41 14.49 14.70 14·92 15.04 15·29 15·53 15.46 15. 40 15. 4127 14.29 14.37 14.41 14.50 14.71 14.94 15·05 15·30 15.53 15.47 15·39 15.4128 14.28 14.37 14.43 14.51 14.73 14.96 15·07 15.30 15.54 15.46 15.38 15.4029 14.29 14.42 14.51 14.75 14·97 15.08 15·31 15·55 15.46 15.37 15.4030 14.29 14.42 14.51 14.76 14.98 15·10 15·31 15.56 15.46 15·37 15.4031 14.32 14.42 14.78 15·11 15·32 15.44 15.43

  • Table 9.--Well 1.34.25.211. J. B. H. Young. Drilled unused water-table well in valley fill, dia.m 12 in,reported depth 101 feet. Highest water level 31.98, May 16, 1933; lowest 69.00, Oct. 14,Nov. 14, 1959. Records available 1931-59.

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 66·57 66.64 67.43 67·55 67·91 68.01 68.44 68.85 68.87 68.802 66.58 66.62 67.43 67.54 67·93 68.03 68.43 68.86 68.88 68.773 66·55 66.63 67·41 67 ·53 67.94 68.04 68.45 68.91 68.88 68.764 h66.80 66.57 66.62 67.39 67.59 67·96 68.06 68.45 68.92 68.88 68.775 66.81 66·55 66.65 67.37 67 ·58 67·97 68.09 68.46 68.94 68.84 68.756 66.78 66.56 66.66 67.33 67.60 67.96 68.12 68.47 68.94 68.89 68.74 'i:l7 66.77 66·55 66.68 67.28 67.61 67·96 68.14 68·50 68·96 68·90 68·73

    0::0

    8 h67.06 66.76 66.55 66.71 67.25 67.62 67.97 68.14 68.51 68·97 68.89 68.73

  • Table 10.--Well 2.34.2.233. Louisa Trout. Drilled unused water-table well in valley fill, diam 12 in,depth 89 ft. Highest water level 32.71,Mar. 6-15, 1942; lowest 76.10, Sept. 23, 1959. '"0Records available 1931-59.

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 72.74 72.54 73.16 73.98 74.06 75·00 75.67 75·71 75·422 72.77 72.49 73.13 74.03 74.57 75·00 75.65 75·70 75·353 72.77 72.49 73.40 73·97 74.23 74·98 75.60 75·65 75·314 72.78 72.49 72.70 73·92 74.20 75·57 75·61 75·305 72.72 72·50 72.70 74.13 74.14 75 ·53 75.60 75.32 Q6 72.70 72.48 73.30 74.03 74.11 75.68 75·52 75. 25 '"07 72.74 72.47 73.28 73·94 74.08 75.62 75·50 75.24 c:::8 72.77 72.43 73.21 73.89 74.08 75.58 75·49 75·22 8I9 72.73 72.42 73.16 73. 85 74.08 75.56 75·43 75.18 ~

    10 72.72 72.48 73.18 73.85 74.08 75·50 75·48 75.14..,'"11 72.71 72.40 73.18 73.83 74.10 75·50 75.42 75·13 '"12 72·70 72.41 73.26 73·79 74.29 75.53 75.38 75·12 [i;;

    13 72.67 72.42 72.58 73.18 73·77 74.41 75.65 75·39 75·14 ;;J14 72.65 72.45 72.58 73.20 73,74 74.40 75.62 75.38 75.08 t"'UJ15 72.67 72.39 72.78 73.18 73.69 74.39 76.06 75·34 75·07 ....16 72.60 72.38 72.78 73.19 73·71 74.60 76.08 75·36 75·10 z17 72.64 72.39 72.86 73.37 73·72 74.70 76.01 75·32 75·02

    z'"18 72.58 72.39 72.80 73.40 73·73 74.78 75·97 75 ·30 75·00 '"

    19 72·56 72.38 72.78 73.42 73.78 e74·90 75.90 75·31 74·99 &i20 72.5§ 72.39 72·79 73.40 73·75 e75.00 h74.30 76.02 75·31 75·00 e74.58

    >

  • Table lL--Well 2.36.28.114b. C. E. Clark. Drilled unused water-table well in valley fill, diam 12 in,depth 44 ft. Recorder removed September 22, 1959. Highest water level 7.30, Dec. 4, 1941;lowest 31.51, Sept. 10, 1958. Records available 1932-59.

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 26.43 25.85 25.43 26.29 27·81 28.95 27·912 26.41 25.81 25.44 26.39 27.92 28.91 27.873 26.41 25.78 25.41 26·52 28.05 28.86 27·834 26.41 25·/1 25.41 26.61 28.16 28.80 27·795 26.)8 25·79 25.41 26.71 28.25 28.78 27·756 26.3) 25.76 25.40 26.'79 28.31 28.85 2'7.'72

    "'7 26.3) 25·/1 25·39 26.'76 28.41 28.90 2'7.68 0'"8 26.31 25.'71 25·39 26.'76 28.39 28.86 2'7.66 '";J>9 26.28 25.68 25·3'7 26.'74 28.35 28.88 2'7.63 t-<'"10 26.25 25.'72 25.34 26.77 28.33 28.'73 2'7.61 Ul

    11 26.24 25.6'7 25·3'7 26.'79 28.32 28.66 2'7.58 ;;12 26.21 26.65 25·32 26.84 28.31 28.62 2'7·55 t-<13 26.19 25.65 25·30 26.84 28.29 28.64 2'7·55

    t-<

    '"'"14 26.1'7 25.65 25·29 26.88 28.26 28.56 2'7.'7815 26.16 25.62 25.34 26.91 28.24 28.50 28.01 '"016 26.13 25·59 25·50 26.94 28.19 28.43 28.19 0Ul1'7 26.12 25.58 25·64 2'7.00 28.16 28.40 28.41 '"

  • (f)

    4XWI-

    R. 38 E.

    R 37 E

    R. 37 E.

    R 36 E

    GROUND~WATER LEVELS IN NEW AillXICO J 1959

    R. 36 E.

    R 35 E

    FIGUR E 5. Chango of grounrl-wotar laval from January 1959 to .Ionuory 1960 and rlopth to grounrl-wotar laval In

    Jonuory 1960 In tho CoulOy.Llngo oroo, Roo ..vol~ County, N. Max.

    tEXP LANATI ON I

    Rogers o..:::.1..! I0 172.4

    Observotion well; chango in water1

    ..::.!!..:.!.. 0

    I162.7 level in feet,and depth to waterin feel below land-surfacedotumT.

    10 I 2 3Miles I

    4 1 ! 1 !

    Is. @>11

    II1

    o~ -4.0[Oouse

    yI

    142.5 0"i72.4 I01

    ~IT. om:z5

    ....±.!.:!.o1

    S. 88.9 ?;I~orrison Q.=!.:..i

    ~Ie4.1

    -1.3 -1.2 I° ii3.1l 0-- I88.G

    I-1.2 -1.2 09"7.""4""075.7 83.9 0+0.60 I92.0-1.7

    ~o1

    °arr 89.3.;~:: i

    o -0.4

    Lingo 89.8o -3.2 -0.3 I

    12.6 o 99.0 ::...!.:.!. gI

    93.9 Io I;~·.i@> I1

    1

    T.6S.

    22

  • " Additional measurements and other data for this well are listed in following tabulation of seasonal measurements ordaily records of water level.

    1Il. Measurement uncertain.

    WATER LEVELS '" (' n R TILocation Name JanURrv 1'l6O Change Hi"h••t. T.n1J"~ Began Yearsnumber Level Day 1959-60 Level Year Level Year missinll

    4.;5.12.134 " Hayo Varnell D1l62.66 17 -11.07 151. 59 59 16;.69 57 574.;6.16.24; " G. A. Sheppard - - - 157.18 59 158••4; 58 56 605. ;5. 24. 412 F. A. Adair 88.93 18 +1.78 88·93 60 102.36 57 56

    34• ;33 Karl Cox 75·72 17 -1.16 74.56 59 75.94 57 565. '16. 7.11 ~ Ralllh Harvev 142.50 18 -5.88 129.77 56 142.50 60 56

    10.421 " Clarence Fuller 172,110 17 -4·77 165·39 58 172.40 60 51:l11.4;3 R. C. Merrick - - - 139·84 56 148.67 58 56 59,6013.133 R. E. Nunnally - - - 153.86 57 135.98 59 57 6035.433 A. A. Beeman Co. 8;.88 18 -1.20 76.00 §~

    83.88 60~i~.'i7.18."illa "E. E. Caviness 154.2"> 17 . 129.65 134.23 60 ~Q

    21.33; " H. U. Jackson 1:l4.09 17 -1.;5 00.09 56 1:l4.09~

    56;1.111 Norene Ledbetter 83.83 17 -1.;; 82.07 58 83.8; 5632.13; T. W. Weathers 97.45 17 - 95.;8 57 97.45 60 57 5933.112 Y. E. Seefeld ::5

    6 17 -l.18 84.01 56 :.56 60 566."i6.9.14'i Eillrene LeGrand .28 18 -1.72 86.Q5

  • GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    fJ.38 E.

    R.SSE.

    R.37 E.

    R.37E.

    / ,,-/ / //'0

    o I 2 3 4 5 MILES__ WM CMAAW

    T.16S.

    Observation well

    OR Observation well with recorder

    ..... Line sllowing rise 1+1 or decline (-J~ of woter level. in feet; dashed

    ..... where opproximate, interval I foat

    EXPLANATION

    SlIoding $IIOW$ area in wlliehwater level declined; density ofShading increases wilh amoulll T.of decline 18

    S.

    T.15S.

    T.14S.

    T.13S.

    T.12S.

    24

    FIGURE 6. Chango of ground-woh' lovol f.om January 1959 te January 1960 In tho Tatum.Lovlngten·Hobb. area,Lee County, H. Max.

  • WATER L Yo V p.r. S """fllJnLocation lIame .Tn"""'"" , 060 Change '''N''."~ T~UA" YearsnUlllber Level Day 1959-60 Level Year Level Year

    Beganmislliru>:

    11.".25. 442 .. R. W. and Nancy B. '3.75 14 f.'52.25.214 State of New Mexico 14 .00 22 - .06 142.04 147,.7,4 ~4

    25.2148 do. 14;.06 22 - .08 l!12·9l:l 59 143.;3 55 541;.;5.2.11la .. do. 29·29 8 - .39 26.5;; 56 29·29 60 54

    11.222 Abilene Chriatien 45.17 8 + .77 29.14 4, 47.29 55 30 32-;lB

    1 Mrs. Mattie Field ~0.q1 12 -1.41 'I'}. '74 46 'iO.Ol 6014.112 do. 5,.113 12 - .42 40.75 46 53.43 60 39 5321.111 J. W. Mayo 55.56 13 -2·91 42.69 49 55.56 60 4929·211 Q. T. Rnnners 51.52 25 - ·93 44.64 51 51.57 56 50'2.121 E. T. llowell 61.88

    ~- .94 ~g:~ 49

    62.10 52~'I;.n1 7.u1a Bell 70.06 -l.l5Q ~O 70.06 60

    ;4.111 R. w. Boyd and Sone 69·70 7 -2.71 51.80 50 69.70 60 5035·111 Fredin Wright 64.70 7 -1.7; 48.36 49 64.70 60 49 51,56

    14.31.2.121 Loia C. HobbS, 57.2; 12 -2.41 34.47 51 57.23 60 51

    'i.ll'\n.Hulda lleide1

    60.'\4 _'\.7" ~2 60.">4 ~2do. 12 44.-81 605.111 S. G. Knoll ·63.45 12 -2.;3 33·;11 50 03;45 Do 495.211 do. 54.46 12 -1.33 '1. 76 49 54.46 60 496.111 E. L. llarbison 63.73 12 -1.81 ;1.;18 49 6;.7; 60 497.311 do. 61.62 12 -1.67 42.82

    ~~61.62 60 49 53

    8.11~ do. 'i7.70 12 -2.08 '\7.Q"> ~7.7Q 60 401'.311 W. T. Carter 68.6~ 12 -2.50 ;5.57 119 68.64 60 ~14.111 .. Dean Goft and 10.70 12 - ;56.12 49 70.70 60 50,59

    C. D. Johnson16.1121 State of New Mexico 52.~~ 12 -1.89 28.86 ~g ~~:~~

    60~19.111 A. B. Hennington i::~.4 12 -2.22 41.1~ 60

    20.1112 Q. 0. Durham 58.99 7 -2.20 33.30 45 5lr.99 bO 4023.213 Lee Whitman 66.71 12 -1.;2 3;·90 47 66.71 60 4627.311 J. R. Fort Estate 58.34 7 -1.55 35·13 4B 58.34 60 48:51.;33 .. Amanda Miller 6o.~g 7 -2.22 44.80 ~g

    60.10 60 5014. 38. 7. Ii,,' B. F. Heidel 62.1 12 -2.76 40.7'1 62.18 60 r.r.

    21.311 * Ida M. Cox 47. Be 7 •• 53 32.48 49 117~86 bO 4927.;1; Guy Cave 57'i~ 7 - .6, ;lB. 30 51 57.92 60 51 5431.111 w. J. and. D. O. 48.1 7 - ·92 37.45 50 48.16 60 49

    AldridJ>e

    TATUM-LOVINGTON-HOBBS AREA, LEA COUNTY

    Table 14.--~rATEl\ r..:evEL8 IN TM'UM-LOVIUGTON.HOBBS MEA, LEA COOlTY, n. HEX., IN JANUARY 1960,HIDlIEBT AND LOWEST RECOnDED LEVELS IN JANl1A.TlY on FEBRUARY, 1lI FEET m:J:.

  • See footnotes at end of table.

    GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Tab~e 14.--WATER LEVELS JN TATIJM-LOVINGTON-HOBBS AREA, LEA COUNTY, JN J.fu'WARY 1960 - Continued

    26

    WATE R LEVELS F,('(J!

  • WATER LEVEL--:'l " '" r" n " nLocation Name Januarv 1060 Cha.nge 'H _h ::.. T_••• Began Yeai'snumber Level Day lQ'iQ-60 Level Yeai' Level Year missiM

    17.3).13.341 ., Potaah Co. of America 155.94 15 -0.84- 146,39 53 155.94 60 5313.434 do. - . - c144.24 49 .161.79 56 49 54,57-6025.244 ., Southwest Potash Co. 145.09 .15 - b142.67 58 145.09 60 58 59

    17.34.21.143 Duval Sulphur - - - 112.71 51 b125·:;6 56 51 52,58-60Potash Co.

    35.130 ., State of New Mexico 90.02 15 - E9.88 53 91.~ 41 41 5917.35.35·213 * do. 39·32 15 -1.;8 37.94 59 41.45 41 4117.:;6.3.333 ., U. S. Government 43.7B 15 - .14 42.02 1~4 44.29 41 39

    27·131 ., DOi'othy Scnrabauer 35·73 15 - .211 ".05 49 35·73 60 :17.'17.10.211 S, M. Reiland 45.28 18 - .Q5 32.87 4q 45,QQ 5812.113 Lee Stiles Estate 55·55 20 -1.48' 40.69 50 55·55 60 5013,312 W. V. Lawrenee 42.74 20 -2.24 26.05 44 42,74 60 g§26·333 Tim Woods 41.72 20 -1.07 26.21 43 41.72 6034.111 C. G. Goodwin 41}.30 20 -1.33 42.13 57 44·30 60 ~17.'18.2.'511 W. V. Lawrence '1.14 1Q -1.60 43.65 51 51.14 607.!lla. ., L. R. SebingB 48.72 18 - .78 35.94 52 48.72 60 528.211 J. J. Hanelley, Jr. 55.03 18 -1.87 36.46 50 55·0;i 60 50 588.331 G. w. Bro=, 46.65 18 -1.61 32.88 51 46.65 60 51

    L. E. Walker'>6.012'1.111 W. V. Lawrence 42.44 LQ - .52 4Q 42.44 60 40

    24.133 do. lfS.70 19 - 41.30 50 -45·70 60 50 5927·133 W. E. Manning 32.77 19 - .68 25.55 47 32·77 60 4631.311 G. L. Beene 41.07 19 ..1..46 26.71 49 41.07 60 49~.11;i ., W. E. BUSby :;2.64 ig - ,76 24.78 44 32.64 60 44.212 Kina Acres 70.6'i + .iQ 'iQ.60 '10 72.10 '14

  • Location 11·33.25.442 12.31.23.333 12.34.11. 1113 12.36.24.434a 12.36.29.112Hame R. W. and Nancy S. F. E. Dickson A. D. Joneo Estate J. C. Clay E. D. Holt

    EppersonRecord 1953-59 1953-59 191'9-59 1947-59 1929-59Highest May 1956 33·55 Sept. 1957 129·51 May 1949 29.57 Jan. 1956 22.55 Aug. 1943 k27·63Lowest Sept. 1959 34·36 Hay 1954, Jan., Sept. 1955 32.13 Har. 1959 25.87 Sept. 1959 34.111

    Mar. 1955 17;0.371959 Jan. 13 33·84 Jan. 13 129·65 Jon. 13 31.B3 Jan. 14 24.53 Jan. 14 33·97Levels Mar. 9 33·84 Mar. 9 129·79 Mar. 9 31.84 Mar. 9 25.87 Mar. 9 33·99

    June 1 33·88 June 1 129.46 June 1 31.93 June 3 24.47 June 1 34.13Sept. 14 34.36 Sept. 14 129.33 Sept. 14 31.91 Sept. 16 824.74 Sept. 16 34.41

    Location 13·35·2.111a 13.37.7.234 13.37·13.132 14.35.33.433 14.36.4.111Name State o:t New Hexico W. D. Patton Bailey Browo:tield W. A. Anderson Levi!? BeamanRecord 1953-59 1945-59 1930-59 1929-59 1949-59Highest Nov. 1955 26.43 Mar., nov. 1947 Aug. 1941 25.46 May 1951, Jan., Mar. 191'9 42·73

    Se"pt. 1959 29.40 Sent. 1')5929.56

    Sent. 1

  • Table 15.--SEASONAL WATER LEVELS ill WELLS IN TATUM-LOVINGTON-ROBBS AREA, LEA COilliTY, N. MEX., IN 1959 - Continued

    TATUM-LOVINGTON-HOBBS AREA) LEA COUNTY

    Location 20.35.1.221 .. 20.35.1.221a * 20.37·9·110Name H. S. Record H. S. Record W. H. LaughlinRecord 1929-59 1957-59 1929-59Highest July 1943 19.38 June 1957 25·9'7 Mar. 1945 26.89Lowest June 19

  • Table 16.--Well 16.36.5.Lot 2. Miss Ethel Yadon. Drilled unused water-table well in Ogallala formation, wdiam 16 in, depth 97 ft. Highest water level 53.83, Mar. 14, 1957; lowest 55·81, 0Dec. 27-31} 1959. Records available 1956-59.

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 55·21 55·09 55·05 55·20 55.39 55.48 55·52 55.61 55.752 55·17 55·10 55.03 55.22 55·)8 55.48 55·53 55.62 55.753 55·17 55.08 55.22 55·37 55.49 55·54 55.62 55.744 55.16 55·08 55·21 55·39 55.49 55·55 55·64 55·745 55·19 55·11 e55.05 55.25 55.38 55.49 55·55 55.66 55.746 55·17 55·09 55.25 55.39 55·49 55·55 55.63 55·73 0~7 55·16 55·09 55.24 55.39 55.49 55·53 55.63 55.74 0c::8 55·15 55·09 55. 26 55.39 e55.47 55.48 55.54 55.64 55·75 E39 55·14 55·08 55.26 55.39 55.50 55·55 55.65 55·75

    I:::;;

    10 e55.15 55·07 e55·08 55·26 55·40 55.47 55·55 55.65 55·75 >,..,11 55·11 55.30 55.40 55.48 55·55 55·65 55·76

    tLj~

    12 55·07 55·30 55·40 55.47 55·55 55·64 55·76 &;13 55·05 55.30 55·39 55.47 55.56 55·67 55·75 ::21 55·24 55.13 55·05 55·15 55·33 55.47 55.48 55.56 55·66 55.79

    H(")

    22 55·21 55.12 55·03 55·15 55·35 55·47 55.48 55.58 55·67 55·790...

    23 55·22 55·12 55.03 55·15 55.34 55·48 55.48 55.58 55·70 55·79 f-'24 55·21 55·11 55.04 55·14 55·33 55·47 55.47 55·59 55·71 55.79

    (,0(J1

    55·04 55.16 55·35 55.47 55·47 55.57 55·70 55·78(f)

    25 e55·21 55·1126 55·11 55·05 55.16 55·37 h55·48 55. 48 55.60 55.73 55.8027 55·20 55·11 55.04 55.17 55·37 55·49 55·50 55.57 55·72 55.8128 55·18 55·13 55.03 55·17 55·)8 55·48 55·50 55·57 55.72 55·8129 55·19 55.02 55.19 55·)8 55·48 55·50 55.60 55·73 55.8130 55·19 55.03 55·19 55·39 55. 48 55·51 55.60 55·73 55.81

    31 55·19 55.03 55·39 55.47 55·63 55.81

    e Estimated.h Tape measurement.

  • Table 17.--Well 16.38.3.333. State of New Mexico. Test Hole No.9. Drilled test hole water-table well inOgallala formation, diam 8 in, depth 107 ft. Well cased to 100 ft. Highest water level24.44, May 29 to June 25, 1955; lowest 40.87, May 30, 1957. Records available 1953-59.

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 )0.31 29.43 32.00 38.08 34.17 37·92 37·07 35·19 31.202 30.23 29·38 31·91 39·03 33.94 39·04 37·12 36.44 35·37 31.163 30.20 29·35 32.39 37.86 33.89 37·89 )6·51 35·94 36.03 31.154 30.13 29.32 32.61 37.00 33.92 37.12 37. 29 35.87 35·42 31.12

    t 30.05 29·33 32.37 36.35 33.80 36.96 38.40 38.83 35·20 31.0829·97 29.29 32.28 35.78 33·93 35.92 38.30 39·58 35.43 31.05 >-'l;p..7 29·93 29. 26 32·95 35.65 33.45 35.84 37·31 39·42 35·20 31.02

    ...,8 29.88 29.24 33·37 35·53 34.03 39·73 37.27 39.22 35.47 31.00 ~I9 29.83 30.68 33·90 35·13 33·77 38.11 37·32 ;8.12 35·87 30·98 Q10 2Q.77 30. 44 33·55 34.75 33.62 37.16 36.72 37.38 36.05 30·95 l-l

    11 29.74 30.28 33·13 34.52 33.48 37.06 :55 .67 :55 .82 35.22 30·94 512 29·70 30·17 33.07 34.29 33.35 40.19 )6·59 )6.32 35·30 30·92 >-'l013 29.65 30.07 33.42 34.20 33·32 38.67 36.49 35.87 30.88 zI14 29·63 30.00 33.27 34.15 36.06 37·67 37·43 35·84 34.77 30.85 ~g15 30.22 29·90 gg.07 33'§6 35.58 37 ·57 )6.70 35.58 34.71 30.84 tx'16 30.27 29.82 34.87 38.40 :55 .20 35.28 30.82 CIl.48 33.17 30.17 29·76 36.02 33.75 34.47 38.30 35f74 35·08 30.82 >~18 30.03 29·71 35·58 34.37 34.18 38·72 35·40 34.85 30.80 t=:I>-19 29·93 29.67 )6·53 34.20 34.08 38.77 35·13 34.70 30.7820 29.87 29·61 35 ·93 34.15 36.92 :;8.83 34.88 34.68 30.77 ~21 29.84 29·55 35·33 34.00 36.57 37.84 34·71 35·07 30.74 >22 29·78 29·51 35·10 36.02 37.36 37.82 34·50 34.68 32.64 30·72 l.l023 29·73 29·50 )8.03 35·13 36.76 37·62 34.40 34·53 32.60 h31.37 30·71 c:.~24 29·68 e31. 37 38·95 34.97 35.92 37·02 34.37 34.48 32.52 31.36 30.68 -<25 2 .63 e31. 86 39·56 37.87 35·33 ;6.47 37·5 35·37 32.47 31.33 30.642 29·61 e32. 25 ·93 . 3 .93 . 3 .03 32. 5 31.33 30· 327 29·57 e32·57 ;8·52 35·68 34.72 36·51 39·42 36.71 31.30 )0.6328 29·53 32·58 40.17 35.13 37·72 )6.26 37·67 35.94 31.27 30.6229 29.52 39·88 34.70 36·19 37 ·53 35·42 31.23 30·6030 29. 47 39·45 34.40 39·39 38·50 35·18 31.22 30.5831 29. 45 39·)6 37·79 35·35 30·55 e,.)f-'

    e Estimated.h Tape measurement.

  • Table la--We11 17.33.13.34l. Potash Co. of America. Drilled water-table well in Ogallala formation,diam 6 in, depth 252 ft. Cased to 252. Highest water level 146.00, Jan. 21, 1953; wlowest 155.91, Dec. 27, 1959. Records available 1952-59. '"

    Daily highest water level from recorder graph, 1959Day Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

    1 155·07 155.23 155.06 155·21 155·37 155.48 155.64 155·49 155·52 155.63 155·77 155.822 155·15 155·00 155·17 155·11 155.43 h155.45 155·57 155.47 155.54 155·67 155·72 155·753 155.22 155·05 154.99 155·21 155.45 155·53 155.49 155.58 155·73 155.67 155·684 155·21 155·10 154.99 155·22 155.41 155·54 155.49 155.60 155.76 155.74 155·715 155·11 155.24 155·17 155.30 155.54 155·51 155·50 155.61 155.75 155.88 155.766 155·09 155·13 155·15 155·33 155.46 155.52 155.54 155.66 155.64 155·67 155.66 Q~7 155·17 155.16 155·19 155.34 155·39 155·51 155.54 155.67 155.63 155.63 155.66 0co8 155.18 155·17 155·23 155.40 155·35 155·37 155·54 155·55 155.63 155.72 155.66 155·70 zl:l9 155·17 155·19 155·21 155·35 155·30 155·37 155.56 155·59 155·69 155·57 155.60 155·68 I'"10 155.14 155.34 155.21 155.45 155.32 155.41 155.54 155.60 155.64 155.67 155.56 155·72 ;to>-l

    11 155·20 155.21 155.38 155.47 155.44 155.43 155·57 155.60 155·57 155.63 155.65 155.78 '"~12 155.26 155·21 155.16 e155.45 155.40 155.46 155·59 155.56 155.58 155·55 155.62 155.80 f;;13 155·21 155·25 155·13 155·35 155.38 155.45 155.58 155.54 155·53 155.61 155·71 155·77 <21 155.18 155·23 155.48 155.45 155.44 155·51 155·55 155.65 155·73 155.61 155.67 ....022 155·19 155·22 155.47 155.46 155.46 155.52 155.60 155.66 155.69 155.63 155·70 ~o23 155.24 155·25 155·43 155.40 155·48 155·53 155.64 155.67 155·72 155.63 155·74 I-'24 155.24 155·24 155.40 155·32 155.47 155.54 155.61 155.64 155.61 155.64 155·76

    (p

    '"25 155·25 155.29 155.37 155·31 155.48 155.58 155.58 155·55 155·51 155.5, 155·72 (p26 155·25 155.18 155·31 155·39 155.40 155·55 155.61 155.58 155·59 155.60 155·7 155.8127 155.22 155·21 155.21 155·33 155·38 155·59 155·57 155.61 155.58 155.60 155·77 155·9128 155.18 155.25 155·17 155·37 155·38 155·61 155·60 155·59 155.61 155.60 155.74 155.8729 155·25 155·15 155·32 155·39 155·57 155.63 155·55 155·59 155·64 155·77 155.8330 155·19 155·15 155.38 155.46 155·58 155·59 155.52 155·60 155·75 155·83 155.81

    31 155·19 155.18 155·51 155·53 155·50 155.81 155.78

    e Estimated.h Tape measurement.

  • 33

    R.26 E.

    EXPLANAT IONObservation well topping:

    Valley fillIillR San Andres ,recorder well

    ........~ Line showing rise (+) or decline (-) of shollow

    "\ wofer level, 'm feet; doshed where approximate,intervo I 2 feet

    Shoding shows area in which water level declined;density of shading increases with amount ofdecline

    ROSWELL BASIN, CHAVES AND EDDY COUNTIES

    R.23 E.

    L.."•.~...

    ".

    /----------1--- ----,---j--.----~~~_+_-----___l

    T.6

    S ~'.

    1:/IS.

    T.8S.

    T.7S.

    1:10S.

    T.9S.

    o Z 3 4 !I Mlloa

    FIGUR E 7. Chango at graund.wahr lovel tram January 1959 to January 1960 In th .. Salt Crook.Mocho Draw arOa of

    Iho northorn ..,,'on.lan 0' Ro.well basin, Chaves County, N. Me".

  • R.23E.

    R.26E.

    ---R.26E.

    u.s.

    T.10S.

    T. tl·IO •••.....--···I.r-..·..YS.

    T.IIs.

    R.23 E.

    GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEVI MEXICO, 1959

    T.12S.

    ...- ...-.,.

    EXPLANATIONObservation well tapping.Volley fill

    OR Valley fill, recorder wellOR Son Andres, recorder woll

    '\0 Line showing rise l+l or declinoH ofshallow water 10'101, In foet, dashodwhere approximate, Interval 2 feot

    Shading shows area in which waterlevel declined; donsity of shadingIncreosea with amount of decline

    34

    FIGURE S. Cheng" of ground.wet", I"vel f,,,,,, Jenuery 1959 to January 1960 In til .. nortllorn pert of Roow,,11 be "In,Ch..'1u County, N. M..x.

  • ROSWELL BASIN, CHAVES AND EDDY COUNTIES

    R.24E.

    T.5S.

    EXPLANATION

    Observation woll tapping:o Valley fillOR Va lIey fill, recorder wellGR San Andres, recorder well

    '" Line showing rise (t) or declinllH'\\> of shallow water level, in feet,

    \ doshed where approximate,Interval :2 feet

    Shading shows area in whichwater level declined; densityof shading increases withamount of dec Iine

    T.19S.

    T.20S.

    R.25 E. R.26 E.

    35

    o 2 11 4 51.111..

    FIGURE 9. Chong. of ground..."tor lovel from Jonuory \959 10 Jonua,y \960 11'1 th. southorn parI "f R".... II basin.Eddy County, N. Max.

  • 3560

    3560

    3570

    II\. / '\ A

    ~J \I \f V \/\1\,!\ I h / kJ If

    v

    " V vV VV \ ~ \/\,"\ "\. 1\ 'A\J V V \/ ~I \ I t ~'\ i\v V \J \/ \ \ \ IMountain View Well, II. 24.29.242, Chaves County

    V \J \I1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960

    I "'\ / '\ "\ '"~

    \I VV 'J V \! \J\/~/1\ ( \I k."V V ""'V \) \/\/1\ /1\ I "\

    Berrendo-Smith Well, 10.24.21. 212, Chaves CountyV \} \J \/~/\1~I .

    ......V V \/I

    I~ I' r\ h "'" ... "'""I yJ v V y V Y \!~/IV!\.Jr\ fo'\,.V V \/""

    '\ I~Barrendo Well, 10. 24.9. 333, Chaves County V \J V \/ \1\,I I I \ I I I I

    V V 'J

    3530

    3550

    3540

    3550

    3550

    3560

    3540

    3530

    3570

    3520

    ..JL&I

    ~ 3570..J

    It:WI-

    ;i

    -' 3540L&I>W-'«wen:z

  • 3550

    3540

    3530

    3520

    ...JUJ 3510>UJ...J« 3500l.LIenz

    3490«UJ

    ==l.LI 3480>0co« 3470I-UJl.LI11. 3460z..i 3450w>UJ...J 3440a::UJI- 3430«3=

    3420

    3410

    3400

    iI\ , In~

    \AII\,

    I-~ UII "'~ , \ ~ \I

    ~

    W ~, ,,

    ~

    Orchard Pork Well. 12. 25.23.113. Chaves County

    V

    1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960

    FIGURE 11. Moan ..enthly arte.lan water levol In well 17.25.23.113 In Roswell buill, a.v". ealiHlty, t4. M• .-.

  • ..JW>W..J

  • 3400

    3390

    3380

    3370

    -llJJ 3360>lJJ-l-:( 3350wUl

    z 33(,0«w~

    w 3330>0co« 3320I-wWlJ.- 3310z

    -' 3200w>w-' 3290a::wI-

    3280

  • Te.ble 2O.--DllPARTURE nl 1959 FROM AVERAGE Am) CHANGE FROM 1958 TO 1959, !If FEET,OF- MEAN JoroNTm,Y AnD MEAN ANNUAL BEADS !If ARTESIAN WELI.8 !If ROSWELL lWlm

    (Meaaurementa and other data for theae ve11s are listed 1n tabule.t1ons ot dally records ot w.ter -level)

    Name Berrendo Berrendo- Moun1:a1n Orcha:r.'d. Greenfield Cottonvood. Arleniaof well Smith Vi(!\( ParkLocation 10.24.9.333 10.24.21.212 11.24.29.242 12 .25.2;5.11' 1,.25.27.211 16 .25.11.113 18.26.,.",IlUlllber

    Dept. 1958 Dept. 1958 Dept. 1958 Dept. 1958 Dept'. 1958 Dept. 1958 Dept. 1958from to from 1.0 from to i'rom to from to from to from toavg. 1.959 avg. 1959 avg. 1959 avg. 1959 ayg. 1959 ayg. 1959 ayg. 1952-

    J!UlUlU'Y -ll·5 -0.56 -16.3 -1.12 -15·9 -1.03 -9.8 -6.4' -11.5 -10.16 -0.9 +3.~ -42.9 +3.'5February -1 .7 -2.61 -17·1 -2.52 -17.2 -2.84 -~., -14." -20.5 -22.12 +2.7 +1. -4'.5 + .1.,March -20.7 -4.90 -1.9.5 t 85 -20.1 -6.84 - .2 -;12.56 -'7.~ -37.06 +2.4 -3.68 -68.2 -22.65April -20.;5 -4.2' -17.8 - .22 -19.' -5.43 -50.2 -17.07 -46. -22·73 -1.2 -4.55 -64.4 -12.0'Hlly' -20.2 -3.51 -17.9 -2.~ -18.4 -3.30 -27.8 +501~ -19.6 +4.50 +2.0 -2.28 -55.9 +~.2'June -22.2 -2.15 -19·9 -2. -21.2 -2.43 -61.2 -2.9 -56.8 -5·23 +6.3 +2.11 -65.0 +9.19July -21.3 + .66 -18.0 +1.04 -20.2 +1.31 -60.1 oIQ.85 -57.7 +4.91 +6.0 - .9' -79.0 -,.60Ausuat -22.8 - .;12 -20.0 - .69 -23.4 -1.09 -7305 -6.72 -71.1 ~.83 +2.1 -1.91 -92.0 -7.59September -24.4 -2.62 -21.8 -2.97 -25·1 -4.~ -~.2 -35.39 -77.1 - .55 -1.4 -7.53 -97.2 -29.30October -22.8 -3.65 -21.0 -4.72 -23.1 -6. - .8 -29.72 -'7.4 -35.71 t 4 -10.88 -77.4 -25.75November -21·9 -4.10 -20.5 -4.78 -21·9 -6.08 -23.4 -15·59 -24.5 -19.17 - .8 -11.89 -67.2 -20.~December -21.3 -3.99 -19·9 -4.38 -21.0 -5. 4, -2'.0 -13.72 -25.6 -17·73 -7.9 -11.27 ~61.9 -17.Annual -21.1 -2.73 -19·0 -2.97 -20·5 .,.68 -42.2 -1;5.!l9 -40.0 -17.58 -0.1 -3.93 -67.1 "10.07Reeord June 1926 JUlIO 1940 July 19!1o AUgtlfl1; 1925 June 1940 March 1951 Aprt1 1931b"So.l1 !

    GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 195940

    Tab1" 19.--MEAN MONT1lLY AnD MEAN AmWAL ARTESIAN m::ADa nl ARTESIAn UELLB nl ROS'rIEE..L BABnl nl 1959 Am) RIDDsrA1ID LOWEST MEAN 1I1iNUAL A1ID MEAN MOlITIILY ARTESIAN HEADa, nl FEET AllOW MEAN BEll LEVEL

    Measurementa and other data tor theae wells are liated 1n tnbulatiot1Jl of dai recordn ot _ter levelBIlle Berrendo BerreDdo- unta1n Orchard Greenfield Cottonwood Arledaat well Bmith Vie\( Park

    LOcation 10.24·9.", 10.24.21.212 11.24.29.242 12.25.23.113 13.25.27.211 16.25.11.113 18.26.5.3'3n11!llberDays Days Daya Daya Days D~a Il&Ys

    1959 at Read of Head of Hend at Head of Head of Hend ot Headrecord reco:r.'d record record record record record

    JantllU'Y ,1 3549·29 31 3547.,58 31 3545.20 31 3521.68 23 3511.20 29 3399.86 31 3330.78February 28 3541.97 26 3546.37 28 3543.65 24 3507.28 28 3492.90 28 ,400.52 26 3~1·12March 31 3544.68 25 3541.82 :;0 3537.56 n 3467.77 28 341£.71 31 3394.55 21 3292.98April :;0 3542.83 :;0 3539.70 30 3533.78 17 3451.05 21 3422.18 30 ,:;86.94 30 ~.OOMay 31 3542.92 31 3540.41 28 3535.18 29 3478.63 31 3459.81 31 3388.64 31 3301.65June :;0 3540.20 :;0 35~.55 27 3530.17 14 3439.57 19 3412.34 30 3386.80 30 ~.43July 31 3539.74 31 3536.77 31 3529.78 25 34~.:;o 21 3404.58 17 3380.12 23 3266.17AUgtlst 31 3537.35 31 3533.31 31 3524.28 31 3419.36 28 3384.17 24 3371.86 24 3247.05September 30 '536·95 26 353,.26 29 3524.2' 29 3424.39 29 3392.76 30 3368.33 25 3248.70October 31 3540.96 31 3538.27 31 35'1.93 31 3482.94 17 3466.71 31 3314.71 31 3285.23November 30 '543.23 " 3541.03 30 35~.59 30 3506.62 29 3494.70 29 3;81.26 30 3303.49December 31 3544.80 31 3542.83 ,31 '539.18 31 3509·21 31 3497.44 15 3386.33 31 3311.89Mean 3542.58 3539.82 3534.29 3470.40 3448.96 3384.99 ~.96annual

    Mean Year Kead Year Head Year Head Year Head Year Head Year Rend Year Headannualifighest 1942 3511.S 1942 3511.0 1942 3569.6 1942 3~2B.1 1941 3517.5 1952 3~.91 19112 3~1'9Lowest 1959 3542.,58 1959 3539.82 1959 3534.29 1.959 3 70.40 1959 3448·96 1955 33 .05 1957 ~ 7.~F1rnt ;rear 1927 3571.2 1941 3566.2 1941 3564.2 1926 3525.7 1941 351705 1952 3399.97 19~ 3384.6

    of recordMean

    monthIUgheatLowestFirat

    monthof record

  • ROSWELL BASIN, CHAVES AND EDDY COUNTIES

    Table 21. --rIA'fER LKVELS IN ROSHELL BASIN, CHAVES AND EDDY COUH'l'IES, N. HEX., JANUARY 1960,HIGHEST AIID LOHEST RECORDED LEVELS m JANUARY OR FEBRUARY, IN FEET BELar] LAFD-CUR.!."7ACE DATUH,

    AIID CHANGE FRON JAl:fUARY 1959 TO JANUARY 1960, m FEET(Aquifer: SA, San Andres limcGtone; VF, valley fill)

    W ATE R ~ F,VELS RECORDLocation Name Aquifer .Tan~'-; 10 61'1 ~~;~~e

    Hi hest Lowest Yearsnumber Level Dav 1 -60 Level Year Level Year

    Beganmissi:'f'

    7.23.23. 242 * Jess Corn SA 262.89 4 -5·22 241.26 52 262.89 60 527.24.32.4jO do. SA 83.84 4 -2.70 61.42 50 83. 84 60 507.26.4.3319. Cecil Pendergrass VF 13.83 7 + .72 15.411- 51 16.32 54 50

    5.)10 J. M. Newton VF 23.~ ~-1.]0 20·52 ;~

    24.96 54 50 526.4200. do. VF 22.8 -L 1f4 10.12 21t.70 54 s417.224 L. W. White VF - - - 12.63 51 14.93 54 50 55-6019·242 E. Everett VF 14.50 7 - .19 8.54 51 16.55 57 50 5219. 442 Gus Everett VF 21. 53 7 - ·50 18.80 51 21.66 57 50 52~.~~~ E. Everett ;',;; 14.00 ~ - .~~ 10.62 51 14.00

    60 50 56o. "., t 2"'.04 + .1

    '" .0460 27.0v s4 SO

    20. 312a E. Everett VF Neasurern t di continued) j12.43 59 15·10 5B 58 602O.312b do. VF 12.10 7 - - - - - 60jO.433 do. VF 12.28 7 - .61 10.98 50 12.74 57 50

    8.24.4.~~~ Jess Corn SA ~i·52 4 -4.94 66.~~ 51 95·5260 50

    4. do. SA 6.4- 4 -2.43 51.2 51 76.43 60 50 52 53 575.255 • do. SA es.57 4 -2·91 "1. 34 50 "".57 60 505.233a • do. SAt') - - - 66.75 56 77.55 55 53 59,605·324 do. SA 90. 87 4 -5.13 68.37 51 90·87 60 50 575.343 do. SA b97.~ 4

    -':00 73'1~50 b97.10 60 50 ~~,59

    i

  • 42 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW 1ffiXICO, 1959

    Table 2L~~WATER LEVELS m ROffi'1ELL BABlli, JANUARY 1960 ~ Continued

    • T , RR :cnRD

    LocationName Aquifer J Change Hi heat Lo'Weot Yearsnumber Level Day '0'0:00 Level Year Level Year

    egen mlaslnD:

    11.24;14.443 Bert Aston VF 26.75 11 w2.25 24.50 59 26.75 60 57 5B15·431 M. L. and S. G. VF 60.04 11 .2·98 '1.JO n42 60.04 60 )8

    Barnett17.121 D. H. Johnson VF · · · 6o:~ ~; 67.29 ~~

    51 54-60.0017. 121a do. VF · · · 4B. ,"7.," 42 46 ".

    17.4" R. L. Hargrove VF "7.69~ "·90

    76.6" 55 o:r.~ ~O 5"lB.}), R. L. Crider VF 114.)8 .2.65 79·)6 4, 114.)8 60 59 5519·233 VF 105.81 B ·1.95 95·1B 54 105.81 60 54 5519:;;; c. M. Kelley VF ,~2'. r~ B .,.86 ~r:~ ~

    12,.76 60;~20. Cole BroG. VF 107.4 B .'.'7 4. 6 n07.;', 60

    22·333 John Tweedy VF · · · "10.03 42 62.44 50 ~57·60

    2;.la2 Bert Auton VF ,4.,5 11 · JO." 56 ,4.,5 60 5923·312 T. T. Bandera VF 41.10 11 w2.44 20.75 49 41.10 60 4923.4~~a Bert Aston VF 28.00 11 :;:r~ ~~.'5

    42 28:~ 60 ~45

    28.11 s. W. Skinner VF 86." B .'2 42 86. 60)6.15' Wiley Gri'Zzle VF · · · 25.28 4, 36. 94 5, '9 42,50,54

  • tl h 'l' ~ R f. " " ~ T. " R E COR DLocation NWlle Aquifer Januarv L060 Change Hiahest Lowest Yearsnumber Level Dav 1'l59·60 Level Year Level Year

    egan mining

    12.25.;6.211 O. B. Berry VF 54 .79 1;1 -2·97 24.55 44 56. 20 58 44 46,48,49;6.;n M. L. KUykendoll VF 54.28 12 + .82 22.84 ~ 56.74 54 ;18 42,57

    12.26.7.421 '" Cecil Johnson VF 9·;;1 12 -2.40 (p) (p) 9. 40 58 ;8 4217.14; do. VF 14.48 12 - .41 12.80 56 14.87 58 5518.221 do. VF - - - 10.87 42 20.01 58 42 46,50,51,

    ~~.~~.60

    18.221a * do. VF 20.00 12 - .65 14.57 45 20.00 60 4519·244 VF 25·05 12 -;.40 21.15 55 25.05 60 5520.144 Cecil Johneon VF 21.59 12 - .09 18.80 55 21.97 57 5529·;1;;1 '" T. S. Lawing VF (r) 12 - 14.20 40 18.;14 ~§ ~

    60'10.21Th Loman Wilev VF ·'10.00 12 -2.2i 27.70 ~o '\0.1 'I

    1;.24.24.112 SAt1 )tfk.45

    12 - 119·0;1 55 121.20 57 55 5tl--601;1.25.1.111a M. L. Kuykendall VF 12 +4·93 27·70 50 47.;18 59 48

    1.;;11 Will SChaaphok VF - ~ - 9·77 42 ;18.08 58 ;8 53,54,605·111 W. H. Belcher VF 99·91

    i~-2;1.58 ~.70 ~ ;;:~;

    60~

    44,586 ....... R. L. Love VF(1) 97.09 -10.2'1 .22 60 5110.111 C. M. Payne VF - - ~ 97·15 55 100.68 58 55 59,6011.111 Carl Nickola~ VF MeaSUrelIll~t di continued ;6.01 42 86.35 59 }9 47-49, 51,sf11.;4;1 J. E. Brockman VF - - - 42.21 42 97.14 55 ;8 57,59,6012.1;1;1 M. E. Colclazier VF - - - 17·93 42 m59. 20 58 ;18 45,46,48,

    ~5.~7 6012.;11 Hal Bogle VF 59·HI 1;1 + ·95 16.23 42 ·61.50 58 ;\9 ~6013·11;1 w. F. Kerr VF - - - 29·95 42 74.4;1 57 ;181;1.1;13 Fletcher Bros. VF 75.10 1;1 ~ .0;1 ;12.76 42 e77·05 58 42 47,49l;1.23:;a w. F. Kerr VF 54.94

    i~+1.,;1 21:gg 42 ~t:~ ~ ~1~.2~~b do. VF ~'1.80 +1.~~ 22. 42

    1;1.;11 Fletcher Bros. VF 75·34 1;1 +1.06 32.1;1 42 '(8.50 58 ; 41,47,49,51;.4;13 Mrs. J.W. Wier VF - - - 25.54 42 6;1.02 58 54,6014.111 Fletcher Bros. VF 101.2;1 13 -;.1; 67.;18 50 101.23 60 5014.1;11 do. VF 100.58 13 -2.06 48.65 42 100.58 60 :;8 ~~~~. ~7_({14.2;'1 F. W. Pfeiffer VF - - - 40.12 42 81.14 ~4 4014.2;la f!' do. w 88.65 1;1 +1.;0 81.79 56 89·95 ~

    55 5815·;12 C. H. Keeth VF 99·17 13 - .12 98.05 58 99.17 5815. 422 Clement Hendricks VF 10;1.42 1; -5.69 49. 6; 42 10;1.42 60 :;8 40,41,52,

    17.411 13 ~9.85 55.08 88.8~ '1054-56

    "R. Tb6man VF 88.85 42 60 404418.21; VF

    ~:~13 ~11.97 111..40 55 98. 49 60 55

    2;1.111 I. F. Wortman VF 1; + .49 51.21 42 78.05 58 ;1824.3;; Hal Bogle VF ~ - - 41.;4 42 75.90 54 ;18 52,,5~6026.211 Belle Hurst 'IF 88.48 1~ - .68 47:~~ 42 91.10 58 ~

    40, 1,5;27.2llb Hal Boa1e VF 104.72 13 - .67 61. 42 104.72 60 40 41 44.5229·223 VF ~.o; 13 - .65 94.tl2 55 9lf.O~ 00 55;4.;2~ * L. D. and W. F. Kerr VF 108.88 14 -1.45 86.79 48 108.88 60 4835·311a C. L. and B. F. VF 119.47 14 -1.;2 74.6; 47 119.47 60 46 50,52,53

    Hickson4'1"'

  • 44 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Table 21. --WATER LEVELS nr ROSWELL BASIN, JANUARY 1960 - Continued

    W----;: T 'S.. R EVE T. S RECORDLocation Name Aquifer Janua 1 ~~~~e

    Hiahest Lowest Yearsnwnber Level D'~ 1 -60 Level Year Level Year

    Began missino:r

    14.25.1.343 V. F. Flores Estate VF - - - 45.20 38 114.10 58 38 40,47,59,62.233a * Massey and Dale VF - - - 52.13 '12 115.93 59 40 48,51,602.431 J. V. Thomas VF 137.78 15 -2.70 67.69 43 137.78 60 438. 41~", Tom Brown. VF "~~.~~ i~

    _ .20 93.24 42 101.~~ 60 ~~ ,6,"11.23 A. W. Lan~eneaaer VF 14 .0 _

  • ROSWELL BASIN, C}~VES A~~ EDDY COUNTIES

    Table 21.--WATER LEVELS lli ROrrrf€LL DASlll/ JAlfUARY 1960 - Continued

    45

    " \ 'T' f.' n T, ~ V ' T C~..

    Location Nn.me Aquifer ,Ta.rl1lurV lQW (lunge Hi hen!' Lowel'lt Yearsnumber Level Day lCc.c-Go Level Yeor Level Year

    egan m1Bai ncr

    14.26.23.111 II- B. E. Green VF 28.47 18 -2.9~ 18.00 54 28.47 Go 5423.214a F. E. Pilley VF 25.50 18 -2.1 13.96 45 25·50 60 45 5225.552 H. L. Rhoden VF 35.81 18 .2.81 25.27 54 35.81 60 54 5627. 421la M. C. Brown VF 0.4;.25 18 -1. 55 ~;.llO 47 0.43.25 ~

    46I

  • 46 GROUND-WATER LEVELS IN NEW MEXICO, 1959

    Table 2L--WATER LEVELS rn ROSWELL llI\3IN, JANUi\RY 1960 - Continued

    VlA','E'O T ,VF.T.::; REf'nRnLocation N=e AquHer J(l.mJa~--1060 C~~e lIi hest Lowest

    Yearsnumber Level Da 10 -60 Level Yeur Level Year

    egan11I16s1nu

    16.25.2.Lot 13 Ralph Pearoon VF 19·20 20 - 16.54 52 24.10 58 49 53,595.Lot 4 E. P. Malone, Jr. VF 12.37 20 -1.25 8.23 56 13.35 45 385·Lot 5 do. VF 12.69 20 -2.34 9.48 42 14.17 45 42 51,535.Lot 13 T. E. Boggs VF 18.6) 20 -2.41f 3.12 117 18.63 60 38 56,576.Lot 4 * F. l~. Nelson VF 11.60 20 - .67 10.93 59 815.40 38 386.313 * Frank Childress VF 27.55 20 - .40 27.15 59 k30.;o .,

    ~8.111 C. Pearson VF cIllo 70 20 - 24.21 115 38.57 57 3910.322...-- W. R. and B. C. Rone VF 54.5'1 20 ~l:.o7 51.98 52 57·00 58 52

    '10.333 ,_. --do. VF 72.2D 20 - 56.55 1,4 76.16 57 44 47,49,50,10.7'}'}8. do. V>' - - - '6.16 '0 83.35 57 50 ,,5~65~8-610.334 do. VF - - - ~:~ :~ 63.71 51 ..~~':(Ij'rc-b(1l.133 J. J. Terry VF (a) 20 - 52.48' 54 57,5 , 011.233 J. B. Funk VF (a) 20 - 28.1~5 1,2 50.06 '156 38 52-54,60~~.124 Buck and Keiser V>'

    6':7'- - ~~.45 42 38.01 §~ ~ 53-601 .2lla Orvill Grav VF 20 -10.51 .24 59 e,Q2.66 II

    14.213 L. T. Lewis VF 61.110- 20 -3~EO 30.70 ; ~5.)o 50 ~ 5715.233 l>lonroe Ho-ward VF (a) 20 - 61~.20 85.32 48 ljo,41,49·51,54-60

    23.433 VF ,,~~.~ 21 :~.~~ ;~.90 5568.80 So

    ~ ~i.'",824.212 Honroe HO'Wll.rd VF b 8. 1 21 - .1 " .42 42 b78.51 6025.211 James Buck VF 105.75 21 -3·95 67.05 '" 105.75 60 ;';)0.433 SA 160.75 21 -2.93 155.)10 55 169.85 58 5734.233 VF 153.12 21 - .92 121.05 55 153·12 60 55

    16.26.,.412 Hal Bogle V>' 8.22 21 ~ .32 a7·90 59 a8.50 56 56 57~.Lot 3 Ed Tavlor VF 28•.,0 20 -=:02- _ 15.09 49 35.82 54 38 48 51-535.Lot 4 A. R. Yoder VF - - - 2i.35 2 39·09 54 41 45,52,55·bG5.Lot 4a do. VF 35.88 20 -2.58 51.30 59 35. 46 57 555.331 J. L. Taylor VF 2)1.23 20 - ·90 16,21 38 31.41 54 38 51,526.Lot 2 H. V. Parker VF 31.61 20 '·1.23 24.07 42 34.12 52 38 41,43,53,56.Lot 4 do. VF 3 it.ll~ - -'.26 27.15 42 37.13 54 38

    40 416.Lot ... do. VF 32.50

    --.- ~19.99 "6 52.50

    ~ ~20 -2·9 ~

    7.121 L. T. Lewis VF 32.77 20 +2.13 7.20 42 35. 110 51,547·321 T. J. Frinke V>' (a) 20 - 3.09 42 45.95 58 38 53,55,608.;;~ Johnson and Shoemake VF 24';1 20 - ·32 12.

    11-5 42 29.86 54 ~ 520.2 4 VI' .J:S,l ~ _-2--:Q2 12. '7 60 a14.40 ,815.254 Hal Bogle VF 0.''[.50 21 -1.32 5.58 55 6.9.90 57 5515.333 Carl Mands. VF 1)1.17 21 -L89 9.66 "2 17·32 54 4216.122 VF 9.48 2l - 9.27 55 9. 48 60 55 56-5917.~;; G. O. ParhB.Ill VF 40.05 21 =,;.25 16.68 42 ~:J~

    54~ 52,5~,~{17. 1 Elde Swift VF ~~62 21 - .14 6.12 I" ' - - - 14.32 42 70.83 58 38 46,48,51,

    56,6019.113 H. E. Hall VF 70.57 21 -12.65 16.19 42 71.90 57 3919·133 Tom Crook y;' - - - 16.51f "2 42.35 52 38 50~~~,

    -6019.211 • H. V. Parker VF 58:95 21 -15·25 9.31, 42 2~·95 60 §o 51,53,5719·332 L. T. Lewis VF (aJ 21 - 58.62 50 88.82 58 53,6019.411e. E. Jeff1'ies VF 66.19 21 -5.14 1t9.60 52 71.53 57 522L333 J. H. Everest VF 28'J~ ~~

    _4.110 2.09 42 28.75 60 ~ '02".214 VF ILl - 10.0.,7 58 1l.i7 6028.431 * Robert Horner VF 30.75 22 -4.15 8.72 102 )0.75 60 38 51,58)0.431 Doyle Hankins VI' 103.29 2l -13.26 66.13 49 103.29 60 49 50-52,54,

    56,58

    ~;.~;; F. R. Zwnwa1t VF 119.~~21 -2.47 84.76 49 ll9.94 60 49 56

    1.41 1. Sammons Estate V>' 102.2 21 _;:11"1___ 82.08 5;' 102.2'5 60 ,;,32.231 B. E. Green VI' (OJ 25 - 20.41 If) ctj~.03 57 43 6032.421a Smith Dros. VJo' - - - 61.09 55 74.29 58 54 59