growth of slums in bangalore city -...

47
32 GROWTH OF SLUMS IN BANGALORE CITY CHAPTER-II

Upload: nguyenliem

Post on 09-Mar-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

32

GROWTH OF SLUMS IN

BANGALORE CITY

CHAPTER-II

33

India is getting urbanized rapidly. It is estimated that by 2030, 40.6% of

the country's population will be living in urban areas (UN Population Division,

World Urbanization Prospects). More than one-third of urban population in

India lives in cities (i.e., settlements with population of more than 1, 00,000).

The number of such cities has increased from 1 in 1901 to 35 in 2001 and

continues to rise (2001 census, Registrar General of India). The rapid growth

of cities widened the gap between the demand and supply of essential

services and infrastructure, people' to live in crowded slums unsanitary

conditions, exposing themselves to pollution and natural calamities.

According to Pranob Sen, Principal Advisor to the Planning

Commission that the urban slum population in India, Asia's fourth largest

economy and the world’s second fastest growing one, is nearly one billion.

The country’s financial capital, Mumbai, houses the largest number of

urban slums - some 6.5 million people live in them. The city is also home to

Asia’s largest slum, Dharavi New Delhi, with 1.8 million people living in its

slums, houses the second largest number of urban slums. Kolkata with 1.49

million slum inhabitants is a close third. An estimated 30% slums

Maharashtra State has the highest number of slums in the country (32%),

followed by West Bengal (15%), and Andhra Pradesh (15%).

Based on the findings of the study suggests that there is a need for

upgrading program through rehabilitation/renovation approach as well as

provision of urban basic services. Generation of regular employment

opportunities will help improve the level of capital, base and potential for

34

capital formation to enhance the level of provision for basic amenities.

Sanitary services, particularly toilets, water supply and waste disposal

facilities need urgent attention.

Reasons for the repaid growth of urban slums: High natural growth rate:

Indian slums suffer from “poor utilization of the reproductive child health

services provided by the government, lack of awareness regarding birth

spacing and very low use of contraceptives”. Migration of villagers to cities

with multinational retail firms and IT giants producing numerous opportunities

of employment: Urban migration of villagers who seek employment as daily

wage skilled and unskilled and unskilled labourers or domestic helps, end up

residing in subhuman conditions in slums.

Changes within a city’s economic structures: Restructuring and

dismantling of larger industries in big cities like Mills, forcing the large number

of jobless work force into informal sector activities and thereby contribute to

urban poverty.

Poor sanitation and housing affect a) Health, Hygiene and Sanitation

b)Education, and c) On Social Problems and Moral Apathy of slum dwellers.

Urbanization in Karnataka

Karnataka is the eighth largest state in India covering an area of

1, 91,791 Sq kms and has a population of about 57 million (current estimate).

Demographically, it is about the size of Britain (58.3m), France (58.7 m), Italy

(57.2 m) and Thailand (59 m). Geographically, it comprises three regions- the

35

plains, the coastal and the hilly and covers seven agro- climatic zones. The

people of the state inhabit 28000 villages and 237 towns and cities.

Karnataka is one of the more industrialized and urbanized states in

India. In terms of contribution to the State economy, agriculture has been

showing a declining trend. Its share in GSDP halved from 36% in 1993 to 18%

in 2005. On the contrary, employment in agriculture decreased from 65% to

just 61% during the same period. While the contribution of industry to GDSP

has remained somewhat constant around 27% that of the service sector has

increased significantly to 54%. The growing disparity between agriculture and

other sectors is likely to have a significant impact on the urban economy.

The Government of Karnataka set up a Committee on 31-12-2008 to

study the various issues relating to urban governance and prepare an Urban

Development Policy for the state in the context of the 12th Schedule to the

74th Constitution Amendment Act and with a view to meet the challenges

created by rapid urbanization in the State. What follows is an attempt at

formulating an Urban Development Policy for Karnataka State.

The total population of Karnataka in 2001 was 52.7 million of which the

urban population was 17.9 million or 34%. Karnataka ranks fourth in the

degree of urbanization among the major states in India after Tamil Nadu,

Maharashtra and Gujarat as can be seen from Table 1. The decadal growth of

urban population in Karnataka over the last 100 years is shown in Table 2.

During the last five decades, urbanization in Karnataka registered rapid

growth except during 1951-61 when the rate of growth was only 18.26%. The

36

highest growth was recorded during 1941-51 (61.7%) and 1971-81 (50.6%).

However, during the following two decades, the eighties and nineties, the rate

of growth of urban population declined to 29.09 and 28.85% respectively.

Significantly, the urban population in Karnataka has been growing

faster than the rural population. During 1991-2001, the former registered a

growth rate of nearly 29% compared to 12% of the latter. Three factors

account for the growth of urbanization in the State – natural growth, migration

and reclassification of cities.

Towns have been classified into six categories on the basis of their

population size. In order to appreciate the direction of the urbanization

process, it is necessary to examine the distribution of population between

different classes of towns and regions and their growth trends.

There are 237 census towns or urban settlements are spread over

1,91,791 sq. kms in Karnataka. The most significant feature to be noted is that

as much as 120 lakhs or 66.4% of the urban population of the state is

concentrated in 23 class I cities. The largest number of towns (101) is in class

III category accounting for 17% of the urban population or 31 lakh people. The

highest growth rate has been registered in Class I towns (34%) followed by

Class III towns (4.82%) and Class II (2.81%). Other classes have shown

negative growth rates.

There are wide variations in the degree of urbanization in different

districts of the state as shown in Map 2. 1. Bangalore Urban with 88% of its

population living in urban areas is the most urbanized district and accounts for

37

13% of the urban population of the state. The second most highly urbanized

district is Dharwad with an urban population of 55%. All the other districts

have less than 40% of the people living in urban centres. Urbanization is

lower than 30% in ten districts and less than 20% in nine districts. The least

urbanized district is Kodagu (13.8%). Districtwise details are given in Map 2.1.

38

Map 2.1.

39

Slums in Karnataka

The Karnataka Government with an aim to make the State slum-free

has decided to remove all hurdles in taking up construction and re-

development of slum areas. The main aim of this exercise is to make the

State slum-free in five to eight years,” According to the survey conducted by

the State Government, as much as 22 per cent of the population in urban

areas of the State live in slum areas. In all, there are 40 lakh people living in

2,722 slums spread across the Government and private land. This includes

597 slums in Bangalore, where 15 lakh people live.

under Slum Free City Planning Scheme, the preparatory phase of Rajiv

AwasYojana, funds have also been provided to the Government of Karnataka

for undertaking preparatory activities for preparation of Slum Free City Plans

of Action including survey of slums and slum households, GIS mapping of

cities, integration of GIS & MIS etc. in 8 cities of Karnataka i.e., Bangalore¸

Mysore, Hubli-Dharwad¸ Mangalore, Belgaum, Gulbarga, Davanagere and

Bellary. The survey has been conducted in 214 cities of the state. A total of

3573 slums have been recorded of which 2019 are notified & 1554 are non-

notified. The total population living in these slums is 3645827 and the number

of households is 745950. 23% of the households are female headed

households. The number of households with pucca, semi puccaand katcha

dwellings is 299329, 325652 and 120969 respectively. The slum scenario in

the state has given in table 2.1

40

Table- 2.1

Slum scenario in Karnataka

Sl. No Description Figures

1 Total Urban Population (2011 Census) 179.86 Lakhs

2 Slum Population 40.50 Lakhs

3 Total No of Slums 2722

4 Percentage of Sums Population 22.56%

5 Notified slums 2251

6 Non-notified slum 496

7 Slum Declared in ULB land 1084

8 Slum Declared in Private Land 666

9 Slum Declared in Railways /Detenu 5

Source: Census Report of Karnataka Slum Development Board, Bangalore

As per table 2.1 the total urban population of Karnataka is 179.86

Lakhs people. Among them the slum population is 40.50 Lakhs constituting

22.56 percent of total urban population. The total number of slums in

Karnataka is 2722. Out of which 2251 are notified slums and the remaining

491 are non-notified slums. The Slum Declared in ULB land is 1084 hectares

and 666 hectares is private land. There are 5 slums declared around railway

stations and railway tracks.

Slum Population Trends in Karnataka

The growth of slums and slum population in Karnataka state during

1971-2011 is presented in table 2.2.

41

Table- 2.2

Growth of Slums and Slum Population in Karnataka State during 1971-2011

S. No Year No of Slums Growth rate Population (Lakh) Growth rate

1 1971 611 5.1

2 1981 778 27.53 6.25 22.54

3 1991 1322 69.62 10.54 68.64

4 2001 1996 50.98 34.5 227.32

5 2011 2722 36.37 40.5 17.39

Source: Census Report of Karnataka Slum Development Board, Bangalore

Chart 2.1

It is evident from table 2.2 that the slums as well as slum population in

Karnataka State is increasing gradually year by year. The growth rate of

slums during 1981-1991 is high than the other decades. On the other hand

the growth rate of slum population is high during 1991-2001, than the other

decades. During five decades of study the slums increased from 611 to 2722

in the state. The slum population during the same period increased nearly

eight times.

42

History and culture of Bangalore

The word Bangalore came from the Kannada word Bangalore which

means town of boiled beans. Bangalore, the Capital of the south Indian state

of Karnataka is better known as Silicon Valley of India, a hub of most of the

tech companies around the world. It is also known as the Pub City with the

highest number of pubs in any Indian city and as Garden City for its year

round blossoms and greenery.

The earliest reference to the name, in the form ‘Bangalore’, is seen

in a ninth century Ganga inscription (hero-stone) from Begur, referring to a

battle that was fought in that place. The present name of the city, Bangalore is

an anglicised form of Bangalore which according to the popular belief is

derived from Bengaalu– synonymous of Benda kaalu or boiled beans and

ooru meaning a town. Tradition associates Hoysala King Vira Ballala (12th

century) with the origin of this name. Vira Ballala, during one of his hunting

expeditions in this region, lost his way and after hours of wandering reached

the hut of an old woman. This woman is believed to have offered cooked

beans to the king. Pleased with her hospitality, the king named the place as

‘benda kaala ooru’ (town of boiled beans). But it is interesting to note that

there was already evidence for name of the place much before Hoysalas.

Kamath (1990) notes that Bangalore is said to have got its name from benga,

the local Kannada language term for Pterocarpus marsupium,a species of dry

and moist deciduous tree, and ooru, meaning town. However, the founding of

modern Bangalore is attributed to Kempe Gowda, a scion of the Yelahanka

line of chiefs, in 1537 (Kamath, 1990). Kempe Gowda is also credited with

construction of four towers along four directions from Petta, the central part of

43

the city, to demarcate the extent of city growth. By the 1960s the city had

sprawled beyond these boundaries.

Later on, the city was administered by the Wodeyars, rulers of Mysore,

until it was given as Jagir (with rights for general administration and collection

of taxes) to Hyder Ali during late 18th century. Hyder Ali and later, his son,

Tippu Sultan, were responsible for growth and development of Bangalore in a

significant way with the construction of summer palace and Lalbagh. Indeed,

Bangalore was already the commercial capital during Tippu’s time and the

second important city after Srirangapatna, Tippu’s capital. During the early

19th century, the city was known to have almost all coins in circulation from

different places and kingdoms, thus evidencing a flourishing trade and

commerce. The fall of Bangalore in the Second Mysore War of 1792, may

also have led to the fall of Tippu Sultan in Third Mysore War of 1799, after

which Bangalore became a base for the British troops and saw the

establishment of the Cantonment in 1802. British control over Bangalore was

initially established indirectly through the Maharaja of Mysore. By 1831, the

administration of the city was taken over by the British, and in 1862 two

independent municipal boards were established: Bangalore City Municipality

(in the older areas), and Bangalore Civil and Military Station Municipality. At

Independence, Bangalore was notified as the capital of Mysore (now

Karnataka) State. In 1949, the two municipalities were merged and the

Bangalore City Corporation was formed. Subsequently, to keep up with the

pace of growth and development, there have been reorganizations with

respect to the zones and wards within the corporation, rising from 50 divisions

44

in 1949 to 95 wards in 1980s, 100 wards in 1995 and now about 150 wards.

With the 2006 notification, the Bangalore City Corporation is now reorganized

as Greater Bangalore City Corporation.

Bangalore, in spite of the buzz around IT-based and related

commercial activities, has retained much of its unique cultural ties keeping its

date with its history, culture and tradition. The city is known for historical

temples such as the Someshwara temple in Halasuru (neighbourhood of

Bangalore) built during 12–13th century by Cholas, Basavanagudi (Bull

Temple) built by Kempe Gowda during 16th century, Kaadu Malleshwara

temple built during 17th century in Dravidian architecture, and Gavi

Gangadhareshwara temple, all nestle in the middle of the city. Apart from the

numerous temples that have mushroomed around the city, Bangalore also

has one of the six basilicas in the country, built during the 17th century,

St. Mark’s Cathedral built during 1808, the oldest mosque, Sangeen Jamia

Masjid built by the Moghuls during the 17th century, and the popular Jamia

Masjid near the City Market built during the 1940s. The ‘Bangalore Karaga’ is

a major annual fair associated with the Dharamaraya temple, is considered to

be the actual fair of the erstwhile city, and is still persistent in the older central

parts of the city. Karaga, a five-day festival of Tigalas, a community who

migrated from Tamil Nadu, has many unique features such as intense

religious fervour, strict rituals, unchanged traditions over centuries, a fixed

route and stops for the procession, welcome and respect shown at all the

temples on route. The annual groundnut fair, ‘Kadalekai Parishe’ takes place

in a part of old city, Basavanagudi during November–December. More

45

recently, an annual cultural fest called ‘Bangalore Habba’ (‘habba’ in Kannada

means festival) is held during the first week of December hosting various

cultural programmes like music, dance and drama. The involvement of all

sections of people and the unique communal harmony displayed by the

special prayer at Tawakkal Mastan Darga (mosque) are also remarkable.

Bangalore geography and environment

Bangalore is situated in the southeast of the South Indian state of

Karnataka. It is positioned at 12.97° N 77.56° E and covers an area of 2,190

square kilometres (850 sq mi). A landlocked city, Bangalore is located in the

heart of the Mysore Plateau (a region of the larger Deccan Plateau) at an

average elevation of 920 metres (3,020 ft). Bangalore district borders with

Kolar and Chikkaballapur in the northeast, Tumkur in the northwest, Mandya

and Ramanagaram in the southeast and Mysore and Tamil Nadu in the south.

Geography

Bangalore lies in the southeast of the South Indian state of Karnataka.

It is in the heart of the Mysore Plateau (a region of the larger Precambrian

Deccan Plateau) at an average elevation of 1010 m (3,448 ft). It is positioned

at 12.97°N 77.56°E and covers an area of 1741 km² (896 mi²). The majority of

the city of Bangalore lies in the Bangalore Urban district of Karnataka and the

surrounding rural areas are a part of the Bangalore Rural district. The region

comprising the Bangalore Urban and Rural districts is known as the

Bangalore (region). The Government of Karnataka has carved out the new

district of Ramanagara from the old Bangalore Rural district.

46

In the 16th century, Kempe Gowda I constructed many lakes to meet

the town's water requirements. The Kempambudhi Kere, since overrun by

modern development, was prominent among those lakes. In the earlier half of

20th century, the Nandi Hills waterworks was commissioned by Sir Mirza

Ismail (Diwan of Mysore, 1926–41) to provide water supply to the city.

Currently, the river Kaveri provides around 80% of the total water supply to

the city with the remaining 20% being obtained from the Thippagondanahalli

and Hesaraghatta reservoirs of the Arkavathi river. Bangalore receives 800

million litres (211 million US gallons) of water a day, more than any other

Indian city. However, Bangalore sometimes does face water shortages,

especially during the summer season- more so in the years of low rainfall. A

random sampling study of the Air Quality Index (AQI) of twenty stations within

the city indicated scores that ranged from 76 to 314, suggesting heavy to

severe air pollution around areas of traffic concentration.

Bangalore has a handful of freshwater lakes and water tanks, the

largest of which are Madivala tank, Hebbal lake, Ulsoor lake and Sankey

Tank. Groundwater occurs in silty to sandy layers of the alluvial sediments.

The Peninsular Gneissic Complex (PGC) is the most dominant rock unit in the

area and includes granites, gneisses and migmatites, while the soils of

Bangalore consist of red laterite and red, fine loamy to clayey soils.

Vegetation in the city is primarily in the form of large deciduous canopy

and minority coconut trees. Though Bangalore has been classified as a part of

the seismic zone III, it has experienced quakes of magnitude as high as 6.4.

47

Topology

Bangalore has two unique topological terrains-North Bangalore taluk

and the South Bangalore taluk. The North Bangalore taluk is a relatively more

level plateau and lies between an average of 839 to 962 meters above sea

level. The middle of the taluk has a prominent ridge running North and North

East- South and South East (NNE-SSW). The highest point in the city,

Doddabettahalli, (962m) is on this ridge. There are gentle slopes and valleys

on either side of this ridge. The low-lying area is marked by a series of water

tanks varying in size from a small pond to those of considerable extent, but all

fairly shallow.

The topology of Bangalore is flat except for a central ridge running

NNE-SSW. The highest point is Doddabettahalli, which is 1062 m (3,496 ft)

and lies on this ridge. No major rivers run through the city, though the

Arkavathi and South Pennar cross paths at the Nandi Hills, 60 km (37 mi.) to

the north. River Vrishabhavathi, a minor tributary of the Arkavathi, arises

within the city at Basavanagudi and flows through the city. The rivers

Arkavathi and Vrishabhavathi together carry much of Bangalore's sewage. A

sewerage system, constructed in 1922, covers 215 km² (133 mi²) of the city

and connects with five sewage treatment centers located in the periphery of

Bangalore.

The South Bangalore taluk has an uneven landscape with intermingling

hills and valleys. The southern and western portions of the city consist of a

topology of granite and gneissic masses. The eastern portion is a plane, with

rare minor undulations.

48

There are no major rivers flowing through the city. However, rivers

Arkavathi and Kaveri merge within the proximity of Nandi Hills, which lie

60 km north of Bangalore. River Vrishabhavati, a tributary of Arkavathi, flows

for a small stretch in the Bangalore North taluk and carries a bulk of the city's

sewerage. The city has a handful of freshwater lakes and water tanks such as

Madivala tank, Hebbal tank, Ulsoor lake and Sankey Tank. Groundwater

occurs in silty to sandy layers of alluvial sediments and jointed quartzite.

The rock types prevalent in the district belong to the Saugar,

Charnokite and Peninsular Gneissic Complex (PGC) groups. The PGC is the

dominant group of rocks and covers two-thirds of the area and includes

granites, gneissis and migmatites. The soils in Bangalore vary from red

laterite to clayey soils.

49

Map 2.2

Bangalore City

50

Quite recently there have been serious attempts by sociologists and

urban planners to characterize the city. Heitzman (2004) has analysed the

nature of growth that the city experienced with the emergence of the

information society, while bringing out the ingredients that led to the

transformation of planning methodologies and spatial planning tools for the

city. Nair (2005) has exemplified Bangalore as ‘the promise of the metropolis’

while illustrating the urban fabric of Bangalore over the last century. In this

profile, an attempt is made to bring out the status of current infrastructure and

various facets of planning and governance. Table 2.3 gives the derails of

growth of area of Bangalore city during 1949-2007.

Table-2.3

Bangalore City Corporation Limits over the Years

Year Area (Sq.KM)

1949 69

1963-64 112

1969 134

1979 161

1995 226

2007 741

Source: Karnataka Slum Clearance Board

As per the table 2.3 the Bangalore city limits increasing gradually over

the years. The city is confined to 69 sq.km in 1949 and the area by 2007

increased to 741 sq.kms.

Rainfall and temperature

51

Due to its elevation, Bangalore enjoys a pleasant and equable climate

throughout the year. The highest temperature recorded was 38.9°C (102.0°F)

on 22 May 1935 and the lowest was 7.8°C in 1884. Winter temperatures

rarely drop below 11°C (52°F) and summer temperatures seldom exceed

36°C (97°F).

Bangalore receives about 1300 mm of rain annually, the wettest

months being August September, October and in that order. The summer

heat is moderated by fairly frequent thunderstorms and occasional squalls

causing power outages and local flooding. The heaviest rainfall recorded in a

24 hour period was 159.7 mm recorded on 1 October 1997.

Most of the rainfall occurs during late afternoon/evening or night and

rain before noon is infrequent. October 2005 was recorded as one of the

wettest months in Bangalore with heavy rains causing severe flooding in

some areas, and closure of a number of organisations for over a couple of

days.

Seismicity

Because it lies in the seismically stable region, Zone II (encompassing

parts of Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh),

Bangalore has been untouched by major seismic events. Only mild tremors

have been recorded in the city. The land use pattern of Bangalore city is given

in table 2.4.

52

Table-2.4

Land Use in Bangalore City

Component PIU "ideal" Index Average Score

Air Quality 395 180

Water Quality 130 121

Land 40 37

Terrestrial ecosystem 150 143

Aquatic ecosystem 15 12.5 Socio-economic (traffic, quality of life, etc.) 270 49.5

Total 1000 542

Source: "Environment Impact Analysis" (2003) conducted by Bangalore Mass Rapid Transport Limited (BMRTL)

According to data contained in the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike

Master Plan, 40.4% of the land in the city is used for residential purposes.

Transport uses 24.3% of the land, while land used for industrial, and

commercial purposes comprise 6.9% and 2.7% respectively. As the city of

Bangalore expands, the BMP expects the percentage of land used for

industrial purposes to decrease, while it expects the percentages of land used

for residential, commercial and public and semi-public purposes to increase.

General metropolitan environment

A random sampling study of the Air Quality Index (AQI) of twenty

stations within the city indicated scores that ranged from 76-314, suggesting

heavy to severe air pollution around areas of traffic concentration. Major

pollutants contributing to Bangalore's high AQI score include nitrogen oxide,

Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) and carbon monoxide.

The Bangalore metropolitan area, referred to as the Garden City of

India has an abundance of fauna and flora. The city has two nationally

renowned botanical gardens-Cubbon Park and Lal Bagh. A majority of the

53

trees in the city are big to medium canopy trees with girths above 40 cm.

Coconut trees form a large minority of the tree population in the city. In 2003,

the Battelle Environmental Evaluation System (BEES) index used to evaluate

environmental components was used to rate Bangalore's physical, biological

and socioeconomic parameters.

Demography and economy

The state of Karnataka was carved out in 1956 based on linguistic

boundaries, with regions dominated by Kannada speaking people. Bangalore

was retained as the capital of the state, with Kannada as the official language

while accommodating other languages like Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, English

and Hindi, true to its cosmopolitan status. The census of population in

Bangalore has been recorded every decade since 1871, during the colonial

times, the most recent census being carried out in 2001. Figure 5 shows the

growth of population in Bangalore from 1871 to 2001 (5.7 million), along with

an estimate for 2007 (7 million). It is notable that since the first census,

Bangalore was already the most populous city in Karnataka. This urban

primacy has been retained consistently for more than a century now. After

Independence, Bangalore, now a State capital, saw an influx of population

migrating to the city, although it should be noted that the steep population rise

in the decade 1941–1951, while due in part to this migration, also reflects the

amalgamation of Bangalore Civil and Military Station Municipality with the

then Bangalore City Corporation. Population growth during the 1970s could

be ascribed to numerous public sector industries and other defence

establishments that came up during the period and fuelled significant

immigration. By this time, incidentally, Bangalore had lost its tag of

54

‘Pensioners Paradise’, gained before Independence. Although the advent of

IT is attributed to the late 1980s, major growth and expansion of this industry

happened only during the late 1990s. Still, population growth in Bangalore in

the last census decade, 1991–2001 (38%), was substantially less than in

1971–1981 (76%). Nevertheless, the physical growth of the city has been

phenomenal over the last few years, and the glaring evidence of this is

increased travel-times and the escalating real-estate prices. The population of

Bangalore city from 1871 to 2011 is given in table 2.5.

Table 2.5

Growth of Population of Bangalore City during 1901 to 2011

S.No Year Population

1 1901 163091

2 1911 189485

3 1921 240054

4 1931 309785

5 1941 410967

6 1951 786343

7 1961 1206961

8 1971 1664208

9 1981 2921751

10 1991 4130288

11 2001 5886844

12 2011 8499399

Source: Registrar General Census of India

55

According to the 2001 the urban agglomeration had an overall

population in 2001 of 5.7 million, including a workforce of 2.2 million, within an

area of 560 km2, and a literacy rate of 75.1%. The hype over the IT industry is

underlain by Bangalore having about 30% of all IT work force in the country

and a personal disposable income greater than the Indian city average. This

has also resulted in a trickledown effect within the urban economy. Further,

investments in industries (not only IT), infrastructure and other services, have

significantly increased purchasing power among the people and have

nurtured real estate with consequent land market dynamics, apart from

creating numerous secondary employment in services. Interestingly enough,

of the 5.7 million population in the urban agglomeration in 2001, about 2

million were migrants (Census of India, 2001b). About 1.2 million of these

were from Karnataka state, mainly from the rural parts, while the remaining

0.8 million were from outside the state, the majority of these from urban areas.

It is further noted that people have migrated chiefly for employment or moved

with household or for education. The large number of migrant population from

other parts of India explains the multitude of languages spoken and

understood in Bangalore.

The population of Bangalore has increased to 9.5 million in 2011 from

6.5 million in 2001. This accounts for 15.7% of Karnataka’s 61.1 million

people. The initial provisional data suggest a density of 4,378 in

2011compared to 2,985 of 2001. Total area under Bangalore district is of

about 2,190 sq.km. Figure 2.1 presents the population details of Bangalore

city since 1871.

56

Chart 2.2

Bangalore is home to numerous high-tech knowledge hubs evident

from the establishment of premier centres like Indian Institute of Science

(IISc), National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Tata Institute for

Fundamental Research (TIFR), Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced

Scientific Research (JNCASR), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO),

National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), Defence Research and Development

Organisation (DRDO), Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Institute for

Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Indian Institute of Information

Technology (IIIT) and several professional engineering and medical colleges

at undergraduate and graduate levels. In tune with recent trends, Bangalore

now has numerous malls and multiplexes that are swarmed during weekends.

With an active night life and Bangaloreans penchant for fast-food, a large

number of restaurants, pubs and ‘eat-outs’ throng the city.

57

The economic fabric of the city, although at times masked by the IT-

based industries is varied, being also characterised by textile, automobile,

machine tool, aviation, space, defence, and biotechnology based industries.

In addition, numerous services, trade and banking activities mark the city’s

economic landscape. An important feature of the economic activities of

Bangalore is the huge concentration of Small and Medium Enterprises

(SMEs) in diversified sectors across the city. Bangalore has more than 20

industrial estates/areas comprising large, medium and small enterprises. Of

these, Peenya Industrial Estate located in the northern part of the city

comprises about 4000 SMEs and is considered the largest industrial estate in

South and South East Asia. A majority of the SMEs function as

ancillaries/subcontractors to large enterprises in the field of engineering and

electronics industries, among others. The industrial estates sprung up mostly

in the periphery of the erstwhile city and gradually as the city grew became

part of its sprawl. Notable among these are the Peenya Industrial Estate just

mentioned, Electronic City and Whitefield. The proliferation of SMEs in

residential and commercial areas, in addition to the industrial areas, has

added to the chaos and congestion in the city. Thus, the thriving economy of

the city has resulted with a net district (7)income of Rs. 262,592 million

(approx. US $ 5.8 billion) and a per capita income of Rs. 39,420, a little more

than twice the State’s average per capita income of Rs. 18,360.

Slums Scenario in Bangalore

Despite higher per capita income within the urban district than in the

rest of the State, and with significant migrant population, the number of urban

58

poor has been on the rise and the slum settlements in the city have not been

contained. The escalating costs of land prices coupled with rise in cost of

living has pushed the urban poor to reside in squatter settlements with

inadequate amenities and services. Some of these settlements have speckled

the city’s landscape garnering immediate action from civic authorities.

According to Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (2006), the number of households

in the urban agglomeration defined as poor was 0.22 million, housing

approximately 1.1 million people out of 5.7 million population. Noting the

importance of the matter, the State Government has set up a special agency,

Karnataka Slum Clearance Board (KSCB) specifically to address the

redevelopment of slums in partnership with various stakeholders like the

Housing Board, Local Bodies, Water Supply Boards, etc. The initiatives taken

up by the local body addressing redevelopment of slums are are noted below

in the subsection on Issues in Planning and Development.

In the Indian federal system, each state is divided into districts (which

are further divided into taluks) for administrative purposes, including

decentralised implementation of developmental programmes. The State of

Karnataka has 27 districts, of which Bangalore Urban is one, comprising

Bangalore East, Bangalore South and Anekal Taluks. Taluk boundaries

dissect the city and extend beyond the Bangalore Metropolitan Area. Thus the

‘net district income’ refers to the entire district and not to the city alone.

Karnataka Slum Clearance Board is responsible for slum improvement,

clearance and rehabilitation of the slum dweller. Table 2.6 gives clear picture

slums in Bangalore city.

59

Table-2.6

Slum Scenario of Bangalore City

Sl. No Description Figures

1 No of Slums 542

2 No of Slums Declared 246

3 No of Slums Undeclared 296

4 No of Households 321296

5 Male 698291

6 Female 688292

7 SC 522999

8 ST 270 743

Total Population 138,65,83

Source: Census Report of Karnataka Slum Development Board, Bangalore

Data in table 2.6 shows that there are 542 slums in Bangalore city.

Among the 246 are notified and the remaining 296 are non-notified slums.

The total number of households in all these slums is 321, 296. The total

population in these slums is 138, 65, 83. Among them 698291 (50.36 percent)

are males. The remaining 49.64 percent are females. In total population

Scheduled Caste population constitute 37.72 percent and Scheduled Tribes

constitute 18.95 percent.

Ownership of Slums

The details of ownership of slums is given in table 2.7

60

Table-2.7

Distribution of Slums and their Population by Land Ownership in

Bangalore City

S. No Type of

ownership Total No. of Slums

Total Population

Percentage of total

population

1 Private (PVT) 250 397416 9.27

2 BDA 82 229769 5.36

3 Government 118 3264008 76.14

4 BCC (BBMP) 79 372400 8.69

5 Railways / Others 13 22,990 0.54

Total 542 4,286,583 100.00 Source: Census Report of Karnataka Slum Development Board Bangalore.

It is clear from table 2.7 that nearly 76.14 percent of slums in

Bangalore city is under the ownership of government. About 9.27 are under

the ownership of private individuals. The percentage slums under the

ownership of BBMP are 8.69 percent and 5.36 percent of slums under the

ownership of BDA. The ownership of less than 1 percent goes to railways

and others. T5his is graphically presented in figure 2.2.

Chart 2.3

Ownership of Slums in Bangalore City

61

Slums and Slum population in Bangalore City

The Growth of Slums and Slums Population in Bangalore City during

1971-2011 is given in table 2.8.

Table-2.8

Growth of Slums and Slums Population in Bangalore City during 1971-

2011

S. No Year No. of Slums

Growth rate Population Growth

1 1971 195 3.15

2 1981 273 40 3.48 10.47

3 1991 401 46.88 3.65 2.85

4 2001 480 19.7 9.78 167.94

5 2011 542 12.91 13.86 41.71

Sources: Censes report of Karnataka Slum Development Board, Bangalore

Chart 2.4

It can be inferred from table 2.8 that the slums as well as slum

population in Bangalore city is gradually increasing over the years. In

1971 the slums in Bangalore city is 195 and they increased to 542 by

62

2011. But the population of slums in the city increased ten times

during the same period of time. The growth rate of slum population

during 2001- 2011 decade is higher than other decades.

Details of Bangalore Slums

The table 2.9 gives the particulars of slums and slum

households in Bangalore.

Table-2.9

Bangalore Slum Details Agency Area No. of Slums No. of Households

KSCB Karnataka Slum Clearance

Board (KSCB; declared slums)

218 106266

BMP East Zone (undeclared) 65 33990

BMP South Zone (undeclared) 65 28926

BMP West Zone (undeclared) 39 10132

CMCs Byatarayanapura 38 7062

CMCs Krishnarajapura 19 1020

CMCs Mahadevapura 22 8547

CMCs Bommanahalli 40 3764

CMCs R.Nagar 15 1351

CMCs Dasarahalli 16 13497

CMCs Yelahanka 3 2589

TMC Kengeri (undeclared slums) 2 113

Total 542 217257

Source: JNNURM Bangalore CDP 2006, created at: April 2, 2007.

It is evident from the table 2.9 that there are 542 slums in Bangalore.

Among them 218 slums are declared by Karnataka Slum Clearance Board

(KSCB). In all there are 171 undeclared slums. Out of which 65 each are recognized

by BMP East Zone, BMP South Zone and TMC Kanageri 2. The remaining are

63

declared by CMC Byatarayanapura 38, CMC Krishnarajapura 19, CMC

Mahadevapura 22, CMC Bommanahalli 40, CMC R.Nagar 15, CMC Dasarahalli 16

and CMC Yelahanka 3. In all there are 217257 households, which are living in

slums. On an average each slum is inhabited by400.84 households.

Urban agenda: governance and infrastructure

An important aspect of a city is how well it is planned, managed and

administered, activities which form the core part of an urban agenda –

governance. However, appropriate state mechanisms through organisational

structures, procedures and policies are needed to enable these. Also, apart

from the formal administrative structures, the presence and involvement of

civil society significantly drive the urban agenda.

Organizations and stakeholders

Greater Bangalore City Corporation (Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara

Palike) is now the key ‘Urban Local Body’ (ULB), that is, the local

governmental structure representing and responsible to the citizens for the

city and outlying areas. Notified in December 2006, the new Corporation

replaced the erstwhile local bodies, Bangalore City Corporation (Bangalore

Mahanagara Palike), 8 neighbouring councils (7 City Municipal Councils and

one Town Municipal Council) and 111 outlying villages. Independently of the

Corporation,(9) which is governed by locally elected representatives,

parastatal bodies controlled by the State government are responsible for

many essential services. Planning in the form of land use zoning and

regulation are vested with Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), a

parasital agency, in spite of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, passed

64

by the national parliament in 1993. This Act requires that the planning function

be vested with the (elected) urban local body and not with any parasital

agency. But, in the case of Bangalore, the Corporation have not been granted

adequate powers by the State to plan, decide and administer their city!

Furthermore, the State has created numerous other organisations of its own

to manage various services such as water supply, law and order, energy, etc.

The result is the existence of many parastatal organisations, each acting in its

own geographic area, leading to complication and confusion in coordinating

different activities. Apart from the issue of a common geographical unit and

the lack of coordinated effort, even basic information related to different

sectors is extremely difficult to collect, collate and to correlate. For effective

planning it is imperative that all the basic information be gathered across a

common geographical unit with the effect of creating a robust city information

system.

In addition to the official bodies, civil society of Bangalore is known for

its vibrant community participation. The spectrum of their activities ranges

from literacy and green brigades to urban governance, ensuring continuous

interactions with the local administration. Notable spheres of activity of these

Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) include: improving urban

governance by Citizens Voluntary Initiative for the City (CIVIC) and

Janaagraha;improving living conditions in slums by AWAS, APSA, Paraspara,

etc.; addressing child literacy by Preranaand the India Literacy Project; taking

on environmental issues by the Environment Support Group, Hasiru Usiru,

etc. Apart from the NGOs, there are numerous resident welfare associations,

65

trade and commercial organisations, and professional organisations that have

played a major role in some of the important activities of local bodies and

influencing their decision- making. Civil society has contributed considerably

in shaping the policies and governance structures and has always intervened

whenever there has been any apathy on the part of the administration towards

activities of interest to society at large. An experiment to promote public

private partnership and bring together citizens, NGOs, industry

representatives and the erstwhile local bodies resulted in ‘‘Bangalore Agenda

Task Force (BATF)’’. This experiment was about to be benchmarked as one

of the ‘best practices’ in urban local governance, when it faced strong

criticisms from several civil society groups for setting aside priorities favouring

the urban poor and was accused of making a back door entry towards policy

making. In the event, the activities of BATF came to a standstill with the

change of guard at the State government two years ago and it is currently

dormant. Another instance of strong action by civil society groups, was seen

when the local government started tree felling and pruning for road widening.

Members of the green brigade, Hasiru Usiru, staged protests, held an all night

vigil, stormed the Commissioner’s office and also moved to High Court and fi-

nally got the actions stayed. The High Court also ruled later that Hasiru Usiru

members should inspect the trees along with the designated Tree Officer from

the Forest Department before any tree felling and pruning of branches was

begun. Table 2.10 gives a clear picture of organizations involved with the

administration of Bangalore.

66

Table-2.10

Organisation concerned with Bagalore Administration

Organizations Functional Areas 9scope of Work)

Greater Bangalore City Corporation (Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)

Urban local body responsible for overall delivery of services- roads and road maintenance including pavements and street lights; solid waste management, education and health in all wards, storm water drains, construction of few ring roads, flyovers and grade separators.

Bangalore Development Authority Land use zoning, planning and regulation within Bangalore Metropolitan Area; Construction of few ring roads, flyovers and grade separators.

Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority (BMRDA)

Planning, coordinating and supervising the proper and orderly development of the areas within the Bangalore Metropolitan region, which comprises Bangalore urban district and parts of Bangalore rural district. BDA’s boundary is subset of BMRDAA’s boundary.

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB)

Deinking water pumping and distribution, sewerage collection, water and waste water treatment and disposal.

Bangalore City Police Enforcement of overall law and order, traffic police: manning of traffic islands, enforcement of traffic laws: Regulation on Right of ways (One-way)

Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC)

Public Transport System- bus-based.

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation (BMRC)

Public Transport System- rail-based.

Regional Transport Office (RTO) Motor Vehicle Tax; issue of licenses to vehicles

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM)

Responsible for power distribution

Lake Develop0ment Authority (LDA) Regeneration and Conservation of lakes in Bangalore urban district.

Source: Official Records of Greater Bangalore City Corporation.

67

Challenges in managing urban infrastructure

Urban activities require the support of infrastructure. Broadly, urban

infrastructure can be divided into social and economic infrastructure. Social

infrastructure encompasses facilities like health care, education, housing,

commercial (shops, markets and hotels), sports, recreation and

entertainment. With mixed land use being practiced in most parts of

Bangalore, shops and markets are the most commonly found amenities

(approximately 1 shop per 100 persons) in the urban agglomeration (10). The

provision and maintenance of primary health care, elementary education,

sports, recreation, and entertainment are administered mostly by the

Corporation, while BDA also facilitates some of the social infrastructure like

shopping complexes, with provisions for private participation. Economic

infrastructure encompasses water supply, wastewater treatment, storm water

drainage system, solid waste management, telecommunication network, and

transportation network.

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) is the

parastatal agency responsible for drinking water supply, and wastewater

collection and treatment in the city. Bangalore is on a ridge and does not have

its own year-round sources of water. Drinking water is pumped from the river

Cauvery, a distance of about 100 km over an elevation of 500 m with an

energy expenditure of 75 MW for approximately 900 Million Liters Per Day

(MLD). Apart from the river Cauvery supply, ground water and water from the

river Arkavathy are also tapped. However, while water supply distribution is

100% in the former Bangalore City Corporation limits, only about 20% of the

68

Municipal Council households are serviced. In view of the rapid growth of the

city, and recent notification of Greater Bangalore, it remains a challenge to

service the remaining areas.

Regarding collection and treatment of wastewater, the sewerage

system is based on the city’s four natural river valleys already noted and

BWSSB is the nodal agency. There are three major treatment plants with a

total capacity of about 450 MLD. Wastewater stress on natural water bodies is

evident from the fact that the present wastewater treatment capacity in the city

is around 450 MLD as against an estimated generation of domestic

wastewater of 700 MLD. Although more secondary wastewater treatment

plants are in progress, they are yet to be completed. Another problem is the

frequent clogging of storm water drains, resulting in pollution of natural water

bodies. Hence it is now proposed to rehabilitate and remodel all the major

trunk sewers to prevent any discharge into the storm water drains.

Addressing mobility in Bangalore city, an overview of transportation

and traffic reveals the following facts. Bangalore city is estimated to have

vehicle population of about 2.6 million while the current city population is

about 7 million. The vehicle to person ratio is far higher than any other city in

India. This has led to increased congestion in road networks across the city

and frequent traffic jams. Manning signaling at traffic islands have also

become unmanageable with the amount of traffic plying across junctions.

Again, in this sector different components related to mobility are vested with

different parastatal bodies.

69

Public transportation forms one of the key functionalities for mobility in

any urban area. In Bangalore where the working population is around 2

million, the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) operates

on any given day with 4144 schedules, 4262 buses, 60,475 trips, and carries

3.5 million passengers. It earns Rs. 20.5 million per day and pay Rs. 0.955

million to the government as taxes (Bangalore Metropolitan Transport

Corporation, 2006). Further, according to recent estimates, there are about

1.6 million two-wheelers, 0.32 million motor-cars, 80,000 autorickshaws, and

0.17 million other vehicles totalling to around 2.2 million vehicles on road

(Regional Transport Office, 2006).

The onus of maintaining and improving road networks lies with the

Corporation. Although a study for the City by consultants iDeCK and Rites

(2005) identified 52 high and medium traffic intensity corridors requiring

various interventions by different organisations, the former City Corporation

proposed only to widen some of these roads. A key aspect ignored while

addressing mobility is the role of land use in generating traf- fic demand.

Failure by the city to acknowledge this, and in particular the implications of

changes in land use from residential to commercial or industrial, has led to

stereotypical approaches in addressing mobility such as road widening,

creation of new flyovers and underpasses, or conversion into ‘one-ways’. In

general Bangalore has over a period promoted mixed land use which at some

level has led to inefficient usage of land. With the City’s compartmentalised

approaches to widening of roads or construction of flyovers and grade

separators, the problem of mobility is far from being solved.

70

Issues in planning and development

To understand the development characteristics of the Bangalore

metropolitan area, it may help to distinguish three concentric zones – zones

which correspond closely with previous current local authority areas. The first

zone would comprise the erstwhile city corporation area of 226 km2. The

second zone would include the areas of the former 8 neighbouring municipal

councils and 111 villages, which together form the peri-urban areas and are

now incorporated into the Greater Bangalore City Corporation. The third zone

would include other villages extending up to the Bangalore Metropolitan Area

limits as proposed by Bangalore Development Authority.

Traditionally, planning has been restricted to land use planning, being

vested with BDA for the region under Bangalore urban agglomeration, and

with Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority (BMRDA) for the

larger peripheral area comprising the rest of Bangalore Urban District(7). BDA

obtains the land, develops it as residential layouts which eventually are

handed over to the city corporation, often involving the extension of city limits.

Land use plans are formalised through the Comprehensive Development

Plans (CDP) prepared every 10 years. Accordingly, the last CDP, prepared in

1995 for the period up to 2011, was revised in 2005–2006 for the period up to

2015 and is currently awaiting approval. A key aspect of these CDPs are that

they indicate the amount and location of land use allocated for various uses

(like residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) as well as restricting

development in specific areas demarcated as Green Belt and Valley Zones.

However, another organisation similar to BDA, the Karnataka Industrial Area

71

Development Board (KIADB), is responsible for development of industrial

areas. These industrial estates are situated for the most part in the outskirts of

the city and KIADB has powers under the law to take over agricultural lands

for the purpose.

Generally, however, the regulation and enforcement of land use zoning

regulations are dismal, leading to a large number of illegal developments and

encroachments on public land – problems which have led Karnataka State to

constitute a legislative committee to look into irregularities in and around the

city. In the particular case of growth occurring around outer industrial areas,

the urban local bodies are generally unable to provide basic infrastructure and

services, thus further aggravating inefficient utilisation of land and other

natural resources. With such instances prevailing especially in the areas of

the former Municipal Councils, the new Corporation faces a great challenge to

deliver basic infrastructure and services.

On 3rd December 2005, the Ministry of Urban Development,

Government of India, launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal

Mission (JNNURM). This countrywide programme addresses renewal of

urban areas for 63 cities encompassing nearly 70% of total urban population,

its primary aim being to link the revitalisation of urban infrastructure with a

specific agenda of institutional reforms. Bangalore is one of the beneficiaries

under this programme with an estimated outlay of US $ 1.7 billion over the

next six years. The key mission of this programme is to support reforms-

driven, fast track, planned development with focus on improving efficiency in

urban infrastructure and service delivery mechanisms, through community

72

participation and ensuring accountability of urban local bodies and parastatals

towards citizens. JNNURM is made operational with two sub-missions:

� Urban Infrastructure and Governance (UIG).

� Basic Services to Urban Poor (BSUP).

The sub-mission on UIG focuses on major infrastructure projects for water

supply, sanitation, sewerage, solid waste management, road network, urban

transport and redevelopment of inner (old) city areas with a view to upgrading

infrastructure therein, shifting industrial and commercial establishments to

conforming areas, etc. The sub-mission on BSUP focuses on integrated

redevelopment of slums combining housing, water supply, drainage, storm

water drains, solid waste management, street lighting, and community halls.

In accordance with the JNNURM guidelines, the erstwhile Bangalore

City Corporation prepared the City Development Strategy Plan (CDSP) for

both UIG and BSUP. The CDSP outlines only an investment plan and

financial strategy for taking up various initiatives envisaged in the mission.

Under BSUP, 218 declared slums in the former City Corporation limits would

be taken up by KSCB for redevelopment. Further, there are 169 slums under

the erstwhile City Corporation jurisdiction that remain undeclared, which

would be redeveloped by the new Corporation. There are, in addition, 155

slums in the neighbouring former municipal council areas that would be

redeveloped by the new Corporation and KSCB. However a draft community

participation law has not been enacted and in Karnataka State most of the

infrastructure projects and redevelopment plans have been administered by

ULBs and parastatal agencies and not through community participation as

73

envisioned by the mission. The result is a continuation of top-down rather than

bottom-up modes of planning and delivering infrastructure and services. This

calls for introspection on the implementation and achievement of the mission

objectives. However, with various initiatives under JNNURM underway, it

does offer hope, and perhaps promise, and in improving the essential urban

infrastructure and services in city. . The development characteristics and

agencies across these zones are summarised in Table 2.11.

74

Table 2.11

Development Characterstics Across Bangalore

Charactersics Development Zones

Zone-I Zone-II Zone-II

Authority Greater Bangalore

City Corporation(

formerly bangalore

City Corporation)

Greater Bangalore

City Corporation(

formerly 8

Municipal Councils

and 111 villages)

Development

Authorities and

other Town and

Village Municipal

Councils.

Urban Status Core City Outgrowth Potential areas for

future outgrowth.

Infrastructure

Services

Present but nearly

choked, needs

augmenting of

exsting

infrastructure.

Not fully present,

with new groeth,

requires planning

and augmentation

of infrastructure.

Farm lands and

scattered

settlements with

minimal no

infrastructure.

Impact of Growth No scope for new

growth but calls for

urban renewal to

sace congestion,

etc.

High potential for

growth since

already peri-urban

area and

emergence of new

residential lay outs

and other

developments.

Mostly rural with

minimal growth

currently but

potential for future

growth.

Planning,

Development and

Regulation

Controls

Corporation

operates building

controls, Planning

vested with BDA.

Corporation

operates minimal

building controls,

Planning vested

with BDA.

Planning vested

with parastatal

agencies: BDA and

BMRDA and not

other local bodies.

No regulation on

building/construction

Source: Official Records of Greater Bangalore City Corporation.

75

(9) ‘Corporation’ refers to the recently notified Greater Bangalore City

Corporation unless otherwise stated.

(10) The urban agglomeration refers to the area formally administered by

Bangalore City Corporation and the 8 councils.

Water shortages

The lack of water supplies within the city of Bengaluru was first tacked

in 1873 by building a chain of tanks called Miller's Tanks in the Cantonment

area. Prior to this water was pumped from the Halsoor, Shoolay and

Pudupacherry tanks which were insufficient for the Civil and Military Station.

The city area drew water from a Karanjee system from Dharmambudhi and

Sampangi tanks. The Great Famine of 1875-77 and the failure of the

monsoons led to drying of all these water bodies. During this time water

carriers Bihistis supplied water. In 1882 the Sankey Reservoir was

constructed at the cost of 5.75 Lakhs by Richard Hieram Sankey and

collected rain water from an area of 2.5 square miles (6.5 km2). The water

was said to be unsavoury and impure. On June 23, 1896 water was pumped

from the Chamarajendra Reservoir (Hessarghatta) which dammed the waters

of the Arkavathi. This tank went dry for one year in 1925. It was built at the

cost of Rs 20, 78,641. On 15 March 1933, the Thippagondanahalli Reservoir

was put into service. On 21 May 1961, the Integrated Water Supply Scheme

was inaugurated. This system collected water from the Cauvery river near

Halgur and pumped up at Thorekadanahalli, Voddaradoddi, Gantakanadoddi

and Tatguni and stored in reservoirs at Mount Joy, Byrasandra and High

Grounds.

76

References

1. Asian Development Bank (2001) Cities Data Book: Urban Indicators for

Managing Cities, in: Westfall, MS and de Villa, VA (Eds.), Asian

Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.

2. Bangalore Mahanagara Palike-BMP (2006) City Development Strategy

Plan, Report submitted to Ministry of Urban Development, Government

of India, New Delhi.

3. Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (2006) At present,

Statistics available online: http://www.bmtcinfo.

com/english/atpresent.htm (accessed 20.11.2006).

4. Buchanan, F (1870) A journey from Madras through the countries of

Mysore, Canara and Malabar, Second ed., vols. 1–3. Higginbotham

and Co., Madras.

5. Census of India (2001a) Primary Census Abstract – Andhra Pradesh,

Karnataka and Lakshwadweep, Directorate of Census Operations,

Government of India, New Delhi.

6. Census of India (2001b) Migration Data for Urban Agglomerations in

Karnataka – D-series, Directorate of Census Operations, Government

of India, New Delhi.

7. Chandramouli, K (2002) A grand dream, The Hindu, 18 July, 2002, The

Hindu Group. http://www.hinduonnet.com/mp/ 2002/07/18/ stories/

2002071800480200.htm (accessed 20.11.2006).

8. Ghosh, A (2005) Public–Private or private public?: Promised

Partnership of the Bangalore Agenda Task Force. Economic and

Political Weekly Special Articles, 19 November 2005. http://

77

www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=

2005&leaf=11&filename=9367&filetype= html (accessed 29.03.2007).

9. Government of Karnataka (2005) Karnataka at a glance – 2004–05.

Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Karnataka.

10. Heitzman, J (2004) Planning for an Information Society: Bangalore

City. Oxford.

11. iDeCK and Rites (2005) Rapid Traffic Study: Identification of traffic

corridors in Bangalore, Infrastructure Development Corporation

(Karnataka) Limited and Rites, Bangalore.

12. Kamath, S (1990) Places of Interest, Karnataka State Gazetteer:

Bangalore District. Government of Karnataka, Bangalore (Chapter 19).

13. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation

(2006) Infrastructure Development and Investment Plan for Bangalore:

2006–30, Final Report, Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development

and Finance Corporation, Bangalore.

14. Karthikeyan, S (1999) The Fauna of Bangalore – the Vertebrates and

Butterflies of Bangalore: A checklist, World Wide Fund for Nature –

India. Karnataka State Office, Bangalore.

15. Nair, J (2005) Bangalore: The Promise of a Metropolis. Oxford.

16. PIA (2003) PIA Technical Directory. Peenya Industries Association,

Bangalore.

17. Regional Transport Office (2006) Vehicle strength and growth in

Bangalore. Regional Transport Office, Transport Department,

Government of Karnataka. http://rto.kar.nic.in/bng-veh-stat. htm

(accessed 19.03.2007).

78

18. Sudha, P and Ravidranath, N H (2000) A study of Bangalore urban

forest. Landscape and Urban Planning 47, 47–63.

19. United Nations Development Programme (2001) Human Development

Report – 2001, Making New Technologies Work for Human

Development, UNDP. New York and Oxford University Press, New

York.

20. Varghese, T (2006) A new species of the ant genus Dilobocondyla

(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from India, with notes on nesting

behaviour. Oriental Insects 40, 23–32.