gs strategy group boise state university idaho ... · gs strategy group boise state...

***GS Strategy Group

Boise State University – Idaho Statewide Research

December 9, 2016

Table 1-1

Q1. First, to make sure we get a representative sample, can you please tell me your current age?

Dec 2016 Jan 2016 Delta %

-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

18-29 19.7 23.6 -3.9

30-44 25.8 25.9 -0.1

45-54 18.8 17.5 1.3

55-64 18.3 16.1 2.2

65+ 17.3 16.9 0.4

Table 2-1

Q2. And before we begin, please tell me, do you currently live in Idaho - yes or no?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Yes 100.0 100.0 0.0

Table 3-1

Q3. Not everyone votes in every election, but in general, when there is an election for President of the United States, do you always

vote, almost always vote, vote most of the time, vote some of the time, hardly ever vote or never vote?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Always/Almost 94.6 91.8 2.8

Always 87.3 83.8 3.5

Almost always 7.4 8.0 -0.6

Most/Sometimes 4.3 6.6 -2.3

Most of time 3.5 5.8 -2.3

Sometimes 0.8 0.8 0.0

Hardly/Never 1.1 1.6 -0.5

Hardly ever 0.4 0.7 -0.3

Never 0.7 0.9 -0.2

Table 4-1

Q4. Which of the following best describes you?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

I was born outside of Idaho 50.5 0.0 50.5

and moved here

I was born in Idaho and have 34.9 0.0 34.9

lived here my whole life

I was born in Idaho but then 14.4 0.0 14.4

moved away and came back

DK/Refused 0.2 0.0 0.2

Table 5-1

Q5. What state did you most recently live in before Idaho?


-------- -------- -------

Total 312 0.0 312

California 36.0 0.0 36.0

Utah 24.8 0.0 24.8

Washington 24.2 0.0 24.2

Oregon 17.5 0.0 17.5

Colorado 8.4 0.0 8.4

Nevada 7.4 0.0 7.4

Montana 7.3 0.0 7.3

Arizona 6.7 0.0 6.7

Texas 5.7 0.0 5.7

Wyoming 5.0 0.0 5.0

New York 4.3 0.0 4.3

Alaska 3.3 0.0 3.3

New Mexico 3.3 0.0 3.3

Illinois 2.9 0.0 2.9

Minnesota 2.9 0.0 2.9

Wisconsin 2.7 0.0 2.7

Michigan 2.5 0.0 2.5

Iowa 2.5 0.0 2.5

Georgia 2.2 0.0 2.2

Indiana 2.2 0.0 2.2

Nebraska 2.2 0.0 2.2

Ohio 1.9 0.0 1.9

Florida 1.7 0.0 1.7

North Dakota 1.7 0.0 1.7

Missouri 1.5 0.0 1.5

Pennsylvania 1.5 0.0 1.5

Virginia 1.5 0.0 1.5

Maryland 1.3 0.0 1.3

North Carolina 1.3 0.0 1.3

New Jersey 1.3 0.0 1.3

Idaho 1.2 0.0 1.2

Oklahoma 1.0 0.0 1.0

Kansas 0.9 0.0 0.9

South Dakota 0.9 0.0 0.9

South Carolina 0.7 0.0 0.7

Hawaii 0.6 0.0 0.6

Kentucky 0.6 0.0 0.6

Vermont 0.6 0.0 0.6

Connecticut 0.3 0.0 0.3

Tennessee 0.3 0.0 0.3

Alabama 0.3 0.0 0.3

Arkansas 0.3 0.0 0.3

Louisiana 0.3 0.0 0.3

Massachusetts 0.3 0.0 0.3

New Hampshire 0.3 0.0 0.3

West Virginia 0.3 0.0 0.3

Another country 8.8 0.0 8.8

Other 0.6 0.0 0.6

Refused 1.6 0.0 1.6

Table 6-1

Q6. Why do you live in Idaho?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Family 39.6 0.0 39.6

Quality of life 21.6 0.0 21.6

Work 13.4 0.0 13.4

Outdoors/Recreation/Weather 12.5 0.0 12.5

Crime/Safety 0.9 0.0 0.9

Overcrowding 0.8 0.0 0.8

Privacy 0.7 0.0 0.7

Religious freedom 0.4 0.0 0.4

Taxes 0.3 0.0 0.3

Immigration 0.2 0.0 0.2

Other 9.0 0.0 9.0


Table 7-1

Q7. What is the most important issue facing Idaho today?


-------- -------- -------

Total 987 0.0 987

Education 26.9 0.0 26.9

Economy/jobs/better wages 17.9 0.0 17.9

Health care 6.4 0.0 6.4

Environmental issues 4.1 0.0 4.1

Extremely conservative/ 4.0 0.0 4.0

Republicans

Public/federal land 3.7 0.0 3.7

Government/legislation 3.2 0.0 3.2

Immigration/refugees 2.8 0.0 2.8

Population/over growth 2.8 0.0 2.8

Taxes 2.3 0.0 2.3

Outdoors/hunting/fishing 2.0 0.0 2.0

Moral issues 1.7 0.0 1.7

Infrastructure 1.6 0.0 1.6

Crime/drugs 1.0 0.0 1.0

Californians moving in/ 0.9 0.0 0.9

taking over

Marijuana 0.9 0.0 0.9

Abortion/woman's rights 0.8 0.0 0.8

Social issues 0.7 0.0 0.7

Guns 0.6 0.0 0.6

Right to work 0.6 0.0 0.6

Liberals 0.5 0.0 0.5

Trump 0.5 0.0 0.5

Politicians 0.4 0.0 0.4

Freedom 0.4 0.0 0.4

State rights 0.3 0.0 0.3

Everything 1.3 0.0 1.3

Other 2.6 0.0 2.6

Don't know/refused 10.6 0.0 10.6

Table 8-1

On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being not at all important and 10 being extremely important, how important would you say it is for the Idaho

State Legislature to address each of the following issues? If you have no opinion, just say so.

Q8. Jobs and the economy


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

8 to 10 70.2 69.6 0.6

10 37.5 33.5 4.0

9 12.0 15.5 -3.5

8 20.6 20.6 0.0

4 to 7 24.6 25.9 -1.3

7 9.9 12.5 -2.6

6 6.6 6.1 0.5

5 6.4 5.5 0.9

4 1.6 1.8 -0.2

1 to 3 2.5 1.8 0.7

3 1.2 0.5 0.7

2 0.4 0.3 0.1

1 0.9 1.0 -0.1

No Opinion 2.5 2.5 0.0


Mean 8.2 8.2 0.0

Table 9-1

Q9. Education


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

8 to 10 80.5 76.9 3.6

10 53.9 49.6 4.3

9 11.4 13.6 -2.2

8 15.1 13.7 1.4

4 to 7 13.9 14.4 -0.5

7 6.3 6.0 0.3

6 2.3 3.3 -1.0

5 4.4 4.4 0.0

4 0.9 0.7 0.2

1 to 3 2.9 3.2 -0.3

3 0.5 0.9 -0.4

2 1.1 1.5 -0.4

1 1.2 0.8 0.4

No Opinion 2.6 5.5 -2.9


Mean 8.8 8.7 0.1

Table 10-1

Q10. Transportation


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

8 to 10 30.6 27.9 2.7

10 12.4 8.7 3.7

9 4.4 3.7 0.7

8 13.8 15.5 -1.7

4 to 7 54.7 50.9 3.8

7 16.0 11.6 4.4

6 11.3 12.2 -0.9

5 22.3 19.7 2.6

4 5.1 7.4 -2.3

1 to 3 10.9 18.8 -7.9

3 5.1 6.8 -1.7

2 3.6 5.9 -2.3

1 2.2 6.1 -3.9


DK/Refused 0.3 0.4 -0.1

Mean 6.3 5.8 0.6

Table 11-1

Q11. Healthcare


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

8 to 10 70.5 59.3 11.2

10 43.7 31.0 12.7

9 11.2 12.8 -1.6

8 15.6 15.5 0.1

4 to 7 22.8 29.6 -6.8

7 9.2 10.7 -1.5

6 4.4 6.8 -2.4

5 7.8 9.4 -1.6

4 1.4 2.7 -1.3

1 to 3 3.6 7.2 -3.6

3 0.9 2.4 -1.5

2 0.8 2.1 -1.3

1 1.8 2.7 -0.9

No Opinion 2.9 3.3 -0.4

DK/Refused 0.2 0.6 -0.4

Mean 8.3 7.7 0.6

Table 12-1

Q12. Taxes


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 46.4 0.0 46.4

10 22.6 0.0 22.6

9 5.7 0.0 5.7

8 18.1 0.0 18.1

4 to 7 42.8 0.0 42.8

7 12.1 0.0 12.1

6 8.1 0.0 8.1

5 19.5 0.0 19.5

4 3.1 0.0 3.1

1 to 3 7.5 0.0 7.5

3 2.9 0.0 2.9

2 2.2 0.0 2.2

1 2.4 0.0 2.4



Mean 7.0 0.0 7.0

Table 13-1

Q13. Natural Resources


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 56.7 0.0 56.7

10 27.7 0.0 27.7

9 9.0 0.0 9.0

8 20.0 0.0 20.0

4 to 7 35.1 0.0 35.1

7 13.6 0.0 13.6

6 7.7 0.0 7.7

5 11.5 0.0 11.5

4 2.3 0.0 2.3

1 to 3 4.5 0.0 4.5

3 1.5 0.0 1.5

2 1.3 0.0 1.3

1 1.7 0.0 1.7



Mean 7.6 0.0 7.6

Table 14-1

Q8-Q13 8 to 10, 4 to 7, 1 to 3 Summary Table


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Q8 Jobs and economy

8 to 10 70.2 69.6 0.6

4 to 7 24.6 25.9 -1.3

1 to 3 2.5 1.8 0.7

Q9 Education

8 to 10 80.5 76.9 3.6

4 to 7 13.9 14.4 -0.5

1 to 3 2.9 3.2 -0.3

Q10 Transportation

8 to 10 30.6 27.9 2.7

4 to 7 54.7 50.9 3.8

1 to 3 10.9 18.8 -7.9

Q11 Healthcare

8 to 10 70.5 59.3 11.2

4 to 7 22.8 29.6 -6.8

1 to 3 3.6 7.2 -3.6

Q12 Taxes

8 to 10 46.4 0.0 46.4

4 to 7 42.8 0.0 42.8

1 to 3 7.5 0.0 7.5

Q13 Natural Resources

8 to 10 56.7 0.0 56.7

4 to 7 35.1 0.0 35.1

1 to 3 4.5 0.0 4.5

Table 15-1

Q14. Do you think things in Idaho are generally headed in the right direction, or do you feel that things are off on the wrong track?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent right minus percent wrong)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Right Direction 61.7 0.0 61.7

Wrong Track 30.8 0.0 30.8


NET DIF 1 30.9 0.0 30.9

Table 16-1

Q15. Over the next 2 years do you think Idaho's economy is going to get better, get worse or stay about the same?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Better 43.4 39.7 3.7

Worse 11.3 13.5 -2.2

Stay the same 41.7 42.9 -1.2

DK/Refused 3.5 3.9 -0.4

Table 17-1

Q16. How would you rate the quality of education in Idaho's K-12 public schools?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent excellent/good minus percent fair/poor)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Excellent/Good 36.6 27.6 9.0

Excellent 4.1 3.5 0.6

Good 32.5 24.1 8.4

Fair/Poor 59.6 70.1 -10.5

Fair 36.6 37.3 -0.7

Poor 22.9 32.8 -9.9


Mean 2.8 3.0 -0.2

NET DIF 1 -23.0 -42.5 19.5

Table 18-1

Q17. And thinking specifically about your school district, how would you rate the quality of K-12 public schools in your area?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000


Excellent 11.7 0.0 11.7

Good 37.9 0.0 37.9

Fair/Poor 44.8 0.0 44.8

Fair 30.2 0.0 30.2

Poor 14.5 0.0 14.5


Mean 2.5 0.0 2.5

NET DIF 1 4.8 0.0 4.8

Table 19-1

Q18. Now, moving on to another issue, do you think the Idaho state budget should be increased, should be decreased, or should stay

about the same?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Increased 33.8 35.4 -1.6

Decreased 10.6 9.4 1.2

Stay about the same 45.4 45.3 0.1

DK/Refused 10.2 9.9 0.3

Table 20-1

Q19. In general, would you say that taxes in Idaho are too high, too low or about right?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Too high 22.6 21.3 1.3

About right 65.3 66.9 -1.6

Too low 9.1 9.5 -0.4


Table 21-1

Q20. How would you rate the condition of state roads, highways, and bridges in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000


Excellent 4.6 0.0 4.6

Good 44.0 0.0 44.0

Fair/Poor 51.0 0.0 51.0

Fair 37.7 0.0 37.7

Poor 13.2 0.0 13.2


Mean 2.6 0.0 2.6

NET DIF 1 -2.3 0.0 -2.3

Table 22-1

Q21. Do you favor or oppose increasing registration fees and gas taxes to improve roads, highways, and bridges in Idaho?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent favor minus percent oppose)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 39.9 0.0 39.9

Strongly Favor 15.9 0.0 15.9

Somewhat Favor 24.0 0.0 24.0

Oppose 56.4 0.0 56.4

Somewhat Oppose 23.9 0.0 23.9

Strongly Oppose 32.6 0.0 32.6


Mean 2.8 0.0 2.8

NET DIF 1 -16.5 0.0 -16.5

Table 23-1

Q22. An alternative to increasing registration fees and gas taxes in order to fund road, highway, and bridge improvements would be to

begin funding these projects through the state’s general fund, which also pays for programs related to education, public safety, and

catastrophic health care. Would you favor or oppose funding road, highway, and bridge improvements through the general fund if it

potentially meant reducing funds spent on these other areas?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 30.5 0.0 30.5



Oppose 62.1 0.0 62.1




Mean 3.0 0.0 3.0

NET DIF 1 -31.6 0.0 -31.6

Table 24-1

Q23. Another proposed solution to funding transportation projects would be to use Idaho state lottery money as a dedicated fund for

road, highway and bridge improvements. Currently, lottery funds are used to fund K-12 education. Knowing this, would you favor or

oppose funding road, highway, and bridge improvements with lottery funds?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 35.4 0.0 35.4



Oppose 61.1 0.0 61.1




Mean 2.9 0.0 2.9

NET DIF 1 -25.7 0.0 -25.7

Table 25-1

Q24. Which of the following comes closest to your own opinion?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent pay as you go minus percent bonding)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Idaho should fund 40.4 0.0 40.4

transportation projects on a

pay as you go basis to avoid

taking on debt, even if it

is more expensive

Idaho should fund 48.6 0.0 48.6

transportation projects

through bonding because it

will be cheaper despite

requiring debt

DK/Refused 11.0 0.0 11.0

NET DIF 1 -8.2 0.0 -8.2

Table 26-1

Q25. Idaho is currently projected to have a $130 million budget surplus at the end of this budget year. What do you think should be

done with this additional revenue?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Fund public education in 45.8 0.0 45.8

Idaho

Deposit the surplus in a 24.1 0.0 24.1

rainy day savings account

Invest in road and bridge 16.9 0.0 16.9

improvements in Idaho

Provide tax relief for 9.0 0.0 9.0

Idahoans


Table 27-1

Q26. In 2015, the state legislature authorized a ‘surplus eliminator’ program. Under this program, any surplus revenue gets split

between spending on roads and deposits in the state rainy day savings account. This allows extra funding for transportation projects

without raising additional taxes or using the state’s general fund. This program expires in 2017. Do you think the state legislature

should reauthorize it or let it expire?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent reauthorize minus percent let expire)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Reauthorize it 71.7 0.0 71.7

Let it expire 21.5 0.0 21.5


NET DIF 1 50.3 0.0 50.3

Table 28-1

Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about education in your area:

Q27. The public library in my community creates educational opportunities for people of all ages.

(NET DIF 1 - Percent agree minus percent disagree)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Agree 82.8 0.0 82.8

Strongly Agree 57.2 0.0 57.2

Somewhat Agree 25.6 0.0 25.6

Disagree 12.3 0.0 12.3

Somewhat Disagree 6.1 0.0 6.1

Strongly Disagree 6.1 0.0 6.1


Mean 1.6 0.0 1.6

NET DIF 1 70.5 0.0 70.5

Table 29-1

Q28. The public library in my community is a good resource for access to information and other technological resource



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Agree 81.7 0.0 81.7



Disagree 12.7 0.0 12.7




Mean 1.6 0.0 1.6

NET DIF 1 68.9 0.0 68.9

Table 30-1

Q29. My school district should raise additional tax revenue to increase education funding.



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Agree 44.4 0.0 44.4



Disagree 49.2 0.0 49.2




Mean 2.6 0.0 2.6

NET DIF 1 -4.9 0.0 -4.9

Table 31-1

Q30. Access to high-quality, affordable preschool for children enhances their educational performance in elementary school.



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Agree 75.4 0.0 75.4



Disagree 20.7 0.0 20.7




Mean 1.8 0.0 1.8

NET DIF 1 54.7 0.0 54.7

Table 32-1

Q31. Currently, Idaho does not provide early childhood education for 3 and 4 year olds. Would you favor or oppose dedicating state

funding to establish preschool and early education programs in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 54.0 0.0 54.0



Oppose 43.7 0.0 43.7




Mean 2.4 0.0 2.4

NET DIF 1 10.4 0.0 10.4

Table 33-1

President-elect Trump and some members of Congress have suggested they may take action to replace the Affordable Care Act. Please tell

me whether you favor or oppose keeping the following aspects of the current law?

Q32. Guaranteed health insurance coverage for people with preexisting conditions



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 87.4 0.0 87.4



Oppose 10.3 0.0 10.3




Mean 1.4 0.0 1.4

NET DIF 1 77.1 0.0 77.1

Table 34-1

Q33. Allowing children to stay on their parents' health insurance until they turn 26.



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 75.9 0.0 75.9



Oppose 22.5 0.0 22.5




Mean 1.8 0.0 1.8

NET DIF 1 53.4 0.0 53.4

Table 35-1

Q34. As part of the Affordable Care Act, health insurance ‘Exchanges’ were created for every state. In Idaho, the state exchange is

called Your Health Idaho. Regardless of how you feel about the Affordable Care Act, do you favor or oppose continuing Your Health

Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 51.2 0.0 51.2



Oppose 30.1 0.0 30.1



DK/Refused 18.7 0.0 18.7

Mean 2.3 0.0 2.3

NET DIF 1 21.1 0.0 21.1

Table 36-1

Q35. In Idaho, there are currently 78,000 low income Idahoans who lack affordable comprehensive health coverage. Would you favor or

oppose the governor and state legislature taking action to provide them with access to quality health care?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 70.8 0.0 70.8



Oppose 22.0 0.0 22.0




Mean 1.9 0.0 1.9

NET DIF 1 48.8 0.0 48.8

Table 37-1

Q36. Do you favor or oppose allowing refugees from other countries to resettle in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 51.1 0.0 51.1



Oppose 43.8 0.0 43.8




Mean 2.5 0.0 2.5

NET DIF 1 7.4 0.0 7.4

Table 38-1

Q37. In your opinion are refugees more likely to be a benefit or a burden to Idaho's economy?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent benefit minus percent burden)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Benefit 38.8 0.0 38.8

Burden 48.8 0.0 48.8

DK/Refused 12.4 0.0 12.4

NET DIF 1 -10.0 0.0 -10.0

Table 39-1

Q38. How much contact have you personally had with refugees living in your community?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

I have had some contact with 34.2 0.0 34.2

refugees living in my

community

I am unaware of any refugees 32.1 0.0 32.1

living in my community

There are refugees living in 17.9 0.0 17.9

my community but I have not

had personal contact with

any of them

I have had significant 13.2 0.0 13.2

contact with refugees living

in my community


Table 40-1

Q39. Has your personal contact with refugees living in your community been positive or negative?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent positive minus percent negative)


-------- -------- -------

Total 475 0.0 475

Positive 66.0 0.0 66.0

Very positive 40.2 0.0 40.2

Somewhat positive 25.7 0.0 25.7

Negative 18.9 0.0 18.9

Somewhat negative 10.0 0.0 10.0

Very negative 8.9 0.0 8.9

Neither positive nor 13.9 0.0 13.9

negative


NET DIF 1 47.1 0.0 47.1

Table 41-1

Q40. When it comes to your views about global climate change, do you believe it is happening, or do you not believe it is happening?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent happening minus percent not happening)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

It is happening 72.0 68.6 3.4

It is not happening 23.7 27.5 -3.8


NET DIF 1 48.3 41.1 7.2

Table 42-1

Q41. When it comes to global climate change, would you say that you are very concerned, somewhat concerned, or not at all concerned?


-------- -------- -------

Total 720 0.0 720

Very concerned 41.0 0.0 41.0

Somewhat concerned 41.8 0.0 41.8

Not at all concerned 16.8 0.0 16.8


Table 43-1

Q42. Do you believe global climate change is more likely to be caused by mostly natural changes in the atmosphere, mostly because of

human activity, or equally because of human activity and natural changes?


-------- -------- -------

Total 720 0.0 720

Equally because of human 48.6 0.0 48.6

activity and natural changes

Mostly because of human 35.3 0.0 35.3

activity

Mostly because of natural 15.0 0.0 15.0

changes in the atmosphere


Table 44-1

Q43. Thinking about the energy sources we use to make electricity, how important is it to maintain a diversity of energy sources to

supply Idaho's electricity?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent important minus percent not important)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Important 92.5 0.0 92.5

Very important 66.8 0.0 66.8

Somewhat important 25.7 0.0 25.7

Not Important 5.7 0.0 5.7

Not too important 3.3 0.0 3.3

Not important at all 2.4 0.0 2.4


NET DIF 1 86.8 0.0 86.8

Table 45-1

Q44. Which of the following is more important to you?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent increase renewable minus percent keep current mix)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Increasing Idaho's use of 39.1 0.0 39.1

renewable energy like wind

and solar even if it

increases your rates

Keeping Idaho's current 56.5 0.0 56.5

energy mix in order to keep

rates steady


NET DIF 1 -17.4 0.0 -17.4

Table 46-1

Q45A. Do you favor or oppose the use of nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 500 0.0 500

Favor 57.2 0.0 57.2



Oppose 32.8 0.0 32.8



DK/Refused 10.0 0.0 10.0

Mean 2.3 0.0 2.3

NET DIF 1 24.5 0.0 24.5

Table 47-1

Q45B. Advocates of nuclear energy argue that nuclear energy is among the best sources of energy when it comes to preventing additional

global climate change because nuclear energy facilities produce no air pollution or carbon dioxide. Do you favor or oppose the use of

nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 500 0.0 500

Favor 62.0 0.0 62.0



Oppose 30.2 0.0 30.2




Mean 2.2 0.0 2.2

NET DIF 1 31.8 0.0 31.8

Table 48-1

Q45A/Q45B Combined nuclear energy



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 59.6 0.0 59.6



Oppose 31.5 0.0 31.5




Mean 2.2 0.0 2.2

NET DIF 1 28.1 0.0 28.1

Table 49-1

Q46. Now I would like to ask you a few questions on land use. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being not at all concerned and 10 being

extremely concerned, how concerned are you about rural farmland in Idaho being developed into housing? If you have no opinion, just say

so.


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 51.3 0.0 51.3

10 30.1 0.0 30.1

9 6.0 0.0 6.0

8 15.2 0.0 15.2

4 to 7 34.7 0.0 34.7

7 12.0 0.0 12.0

6 5.9 0.0 5.9

5 13.5 0.0 13.5

4 3.3 0.0 3.3

1 to 3 9.4 0.0 9.4

3 3.4 0.0 3.4

2 1.8 0.0 1.8

1 4.2 0.0 4.2


Mean 7.3 0.0 7.3

Table 50-1

On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being not at all important and 10 being extremely important, how important are the following values related

to farmland? If you have no opinion, just say so.

Q47. Scenic value


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 45.0 0.0 45.0

10 24.8 0.0 24.8

9 5.5 0.0 5.5

8 14.6 0.0 14.6

4 to 7 38.7 0.0 38.7

7 11.6 0.0 11.6

6 8.4 0.0 8.4

5 14.5 0.0 14.5

4 4.2 0.0 4.2

1 to 3 12.5 0.0 12.5

3 4.2 0.0 4.2

2 2.9 0.0 2.9

1 5.3 0.0 5.3


Mean 6.9 0.0 6.9

Table 51-1

Q48. Environmental Quality


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 58.0 0.0 58.0

10 32.4 0.0 32.4

9 7.8 0.0 7.8

8 17.8 0.0 17.8

4 to 7 30.6 0.0 30.6

7 11.5 0.0 11.5

6 5.6 0.0 5.6

5 10.9 0.0 10.9

4 2.6 0.0 2.6

1 to 3 6.8 0.0 6.8

3 2.7 0.0 2.7

2 0.9 0.0 0.9

1 3.1 0.0 3.1


Mean 7.6 0.0 7.6

Table 52-1

Q49. Historic Value


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 40.3 0.0 40.3

10 21.9 0.0 21.9

9 5.4 0.0 5.4

8 13.0 0.0 13.0

4 to 7 40.0 0.0 40.0

7 10.0 0.0 10.0

6 9.3 0.0 9.3

5 15.9 0.0 15.9

4 4.8 0.0 4.8

1 to 3 14.8 0.0 14.8

3 6.0 0.0 6.0

2 2.5 0.0 2.5

1 6.3 0.0 6.3


Mean 6.6 0.0 6.6

Table 53-1

Q50. Economic Value


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 51.6 0.0 51.6

10 26.0 0.0 26.0

9 9.0 0.0 9.0

8 16.5 0.0 16.5

4 to 7 35.6 0.0 35.6

7 11.9 0.0 11.9

6 8.0 0.0 8.0

5 13.5 0.0 13.5

4 2.3 0.0 2.3

1 to 3 7.1 0.0 7.1

3 2.5 0.0 2.5

2 1.4 0.0 1.4

1 3.2 0.0 3.2


Mean 7.4 0.0 7.4

Table 54-1

Q51. Saving farmland for future food production


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

8 to 10 72.2 0.0 72.2

10 47.0 0.0 47.0

9 9.6 0.0 9.6

8 15.6 0.0 15.6

4 to 7 20.2 0.0 20.2

7 8.0 0.0 8.0

6 4.1 0.0 4.1

5 6.4 0.0 6.4

4 1.6 0.0 1.6

1 to 3 5.0 0.0 5.0

3 1.4 0.0 1.4

2 0.7 0.0 0.7

1 2.9 0.0 2.9


Mean 8.3 0.0 8.3

Table 55-1

Q52. Farmland preservation refers to efforts communities or governments undertake to ensure that farmland does not get converted to

suburban development. Would you favor or oppose the Idaho state government funding a farmland preservation program in Idaho?



-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Favor 66.7 0.0 66.7

Strongly favor 40.6 0.0 40.6

Somewhat favor 26.1 0.0 26.1

Oppose 23.7 0.0 23.7

Somewhat oppose 11.0 0.0 11.0

Strongly oppose 12.7 0.0 12.7

Neither agree nor disagree 4.6 0.0 4.6


NET DIF 1 43.0 0.0 43.0

Table 56-1

Q53. How much would you personally be willing to pay each year over the next 20 years to support a farmland preservation program in

Idaho?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent less than $50 per year minus percent $50+ per year)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 0.0 1000

Less than $50 per year 44.8 0.0 44.8

Less than $25 per year 24.6 0.0 24.6

$25 to $50 per year 20.3 0.0 20.3

$50+ per year 17.2 0.0 17.2

$50 to $100 per year 12.1 0.0 12.1

More than $100 per year 5.1 0.0 5.1

I am not willing to pay to 30.7 0.0 30.7

support a farmland

preservation program in

Idaho


NET DIF 1 27.6 0.0 27.6

Table 57-1

Q54. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that

people might hold are arranged from very liberal to very conservative. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you

thought much about this?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent conservative minus percent liberal)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Liberal 21.3 20.7 0.6

Very Liberal 6.8 6.2 0.6

Liberal 5.9 7.7 -1.8

Somewhat Liberal 8.6 6.8 1.8

Moderate 25.8 24.2 1.6

Conservative 47.4 48.4 -1.0

Somewhat Conservative 14.2 15.4 -1.2

Conservative 18.1 15.9 2.2

Very Conservative 15.1 17.1 -2.0

DK/Refused 5.4 6.7 -1.3

NET DIF 1 26.0 27.7 -1.7

Table 58-1

Q55. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent Republican minus percent Democrat)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Republican 36.4 39.2 -2.8

Strong Republican 23.9 27.0 -3.1

Not very strong Repub 12.6 12.2 0.4

Democrat 18.1 17.4 0.7

Strong Democrat 13.0 12.5 0.5

Not very strong Dem 5.1 4.9 0.2

Independent 38.5 36.5 2.0

Indy lean Repub 11.9 13.0 -1.1

Indy lean Dem 6.9 7.0 -0.1

Pure Independent 19.7 16.5 3.2

Other 3.5 3.4 0.1

DK/Refused 3.4 3.5 -0.1

NET DIF 1 18.3 21.8 -3.5

Table 59-1

Q56. What racial or ethnic group best describes you?

(NET DIF 1 - Percent white minus percent non-white)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

White 90.6 90.5 0.1

Non-White 8.3 7.7 0.6

Latino or Hispanic 2.8 2.9 -0.1

Black 0.2 0.2 0.0

Asian 0.2 0.3 -0.1

Native American 2.0 1.1 0.9

Other 1.0 1.3 -0.3

Two or more 2.1 1.9 0.2

DK/Refused 1.1 1.8 -0.7

NET DIF 1 82.3 82.8 -0.5

Table 60-1

Q57. What is the highest level of education or training you have completed?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

High school 17.9 21.4 -3.5

Some high school 1.8 2.1 -0.3

High school degree or 16.1 19.3 -3.2

equivalent

College 63.4 59.7 3.7

Some college 25.4 23.0 2.4

Associate's Degree 13.3 13.0 0.3

Bachelor's Degree 24.7 23.7 1.0

Graduate school 17.5 17.3 0.2

Some graduate school 3.3 3.6 -0.3

Graduate degree 14.2 13.7 0.5

DK/Refused 1.2 1.6 -0.4

Table 61-1

Q58. What is your religion?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Mainstream Protestant 20.9 18.9 2.0

Non-denominational Christian 19.8 21.5 -1.7

Mormon 18.1 16.6 1.5

Catholic 11.5 10.4 1.1

No Religion 10.6 13.4 -2.8

Atheist/Agnostic 7.6 7.1 0.5

Other 5.7 5.3 0.4

Jewish 0.5 0.4 0.1

DK/Refused 5.4 6.4 -1.0

Table 62-1

Q59. Do you currently have any children under the age of 18?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Yes 32.0 34.7 -2.7

No 66.8 63.9 2.9

DK/Refused 1.1 1.4 -0.3

Table 63-1

Q60. Which of the following best describes your annual household income before taxes?


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Table 66-1

Q63. Phone type:

(NET DIF 1 - Percent land minus percent cell)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 999 1

Landline 58.7 59.7 -1.0

Cell Phone 41.3 40.3 1.0

NET DIF 1 17.4 19.3 -1.9

Table 67-1

Survey Date:

(NET DIF 1 - Percent Dec 2016 minus percent Jan 2016)


-------- -------- -------

Total 1000 1000 0.0

Dec 2016 100.0 0.0 100.0

Jan 2016 0.0 100.0 -100.0

NET DIF 1 100.0 -100.0 200.0


Boise State University - Idaho Statewide Research / December 9, 2016

Table 1-1


BANNER 1 - PARTY/IDEOLOGY

Q54 Ideology Q6 Why Live Idaho

Q55 Party Male Female =========================== ====================

==================== ==================== ==================== Mode- Very Qual

Total N Total % Dem Indy Repub Dem Indy Repub Dem Indy Repub Lib rate Cons Cons Family Life Work

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 181 385 364 62 215 183 119 170 181 213 258 474 151 396 216 134

18-29 197 19.7% 17.6 21.0 20.2 24.1 18.4 18.7 14.2 24.3 21.8 20.8 22.3 17.1 14.1 25.4 14.8 11.6

30-44 258 25.8% 31.8 28.2 20.9 29.3 30.3 21.1 33.1 25.4 20.7 32.1 25.1 23.6 22.0 26.4 23.5 34.0

45-54 188 18.8% 12.9 17.3 23.5 12.1 14.4 21.6 13.4 21.0 25.4 14.4 20.3 21.0 19.0 15.8 24.1 23.4

55-64 183 18.3% 16.5 17.1 19.8 10.3 18.4 20.5 19.7 15.5 19.2 13.9 18.9 19.6 24.6 17.0 18.5 15.6

65+ 173 17.3% 21.2 16.4 15.6 24.1 18.4 18.1 19.7 13.8 13.0 18.7 13.3 18.7 20.4 15.3 19.1 15.5

PAGE 1



Table 1-2


BANNER 2 - ISSUE

Q8-Q13 1-3 Ratings Q8-Q13 4-7 Ratings Q8-Q13 8-10 Ratings

========================================= ========================================= =========================================

Job Trans- Health Nat Job Trans- Health Nat Job Trans- Health Nat

Total N Total % Econ Edu port care Taxes Resour Econ Edu port care Taxes Resour Econ Edu port care Taxes Resour

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 25 29 109 36 75 45 246 139 547 228 428 351 702 805 306 705 464 567

18-29 197 19.7% 16.3 14.4 15.8 9.0 19.2 23.1 17.5 14.3 20.9 22.4 19.3 19.5 20.6 20.6 19.1 19.5 19.4 20.0

30-44 258 25.8% 20.7 14.4 22.1 14.9 31.9 17.2 32.3 20.1 29.0 29.9 27.7 31.0 24.3 27.4 23.0 25.3 23.3 23.9

45-54 188 18.8% 13.0 6.9 23.2 22.8 16.1 13.6 14.8 18.9 20.2 20.0 20.2 20.9 20.5 19.1 14.3 18.5 18.7 18.0

55-64 183 18.3% 16.8 24.5 22.8 13.8 13.6 20.8 19.8 28.0 14.7 13.1 17.7 15.1 17.5 16.7 23.7 19.8 19.8 20.1

65+ 173 17.3% 33.2 39.8 16.1 39.6 19.2 25.2 15.7 18.6 15.2 14.5 15.1 13.5 17.1 16.1 19.9 16.9 18.9 18.0

PAGE 2



Table 1-3


BANNER 3 - ISSUE/BUDGET

Quality

===========================

Q7 Most Imp Q15 ID Econ Q16 K-12 Q17 School

==================== Next 2 Years Idaho District Q18 State Budget Q19 Taxes in ID

Econ Q14 ID Track ==================== ============= ============= ==================== ====================

Educ- Jobs Health ============= Stay Exc Fair Exc Fair Incr- Decr- Stay Too About Too

Total N Total % ation Wages Care Right Wrong Better Worse Same Good Poor Good Poor eased eased Same High Right Low

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 265 176 63 617 308 434 113 417 366 596 496 448 338 106 454 226 653 91

18-29 197 19.7% 22.8 17.0 18.8 20.7 16.4 18.0 17.4 22.6 14.3 22.6 17.0 21.3 17.7 10.7 24.0 13.9 21.8 15.8

30-44 258 25.8% 33.2 21.8 26.1 27.0 23.5 25.8 30.6 24.5 24.1 27.5 27.5 25.1 32.7 23.0 22.8 23.6 25.7 35.4

45-54 188 18.8% 16.2 27.6 25.2 20.6 15.6 22.2 17.4 16.0 21.0 17.7 19.3 19.1 15.9 19.8 19.3 17.5 20.4 15.2

55-64 183 18.3% 14.4 20.3 17.1 15.5 25.3 16.5 20.3 19.4 20.1 17.6 18.0 19.5 17.4 23.0 17.5 19.8 17.5 21.4

65+ 173 17.3% 13.4 13.3 12.8 16.3 19.2 17.6 14.3 17.6 20.5 14.6 18.2 15.0 16.3 23.4 16.5 25.1 14.7 12.2

PAGE 3



Table 1-4


BANNER 4 - BUDGET

Other Solutions Q24 Fund

Q20 Roads Q21 Increase =========================== Transport Q25 $130M Surplus Q26 Surplus

Bridges Reg Fees Q22 Use Q23 ============= What Do? Eliminator

============= Gas taxes Gen. Fund Lotto Funds Pay =========================== =============

Exc Fair ============= ============= ============= As You Public Tax Road Rainy Reau- Let

Total N Total % Good Poor Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Go Bonds Edu Relief Improv Day thoriz Expire

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 486 510 399 564 305 621 354 611 404 486 458 90 169 241 717 215

18-29 197 19.7% 23.7 15.6 20.1 18.8 17.8 21.2 16.9 21.8 19.6 20.0 23.9 12.0 10.6 21.7 18.6 23.8

30-44 258 25.8% 23.8 27.9 28.2 24.4 25.2 27.1 23.7 27.5 29.0 25.9 31.3 24.5 20.8 21.2 25.9 26.3

45-54 188 18.8% 19.9 18.0 16.1 21.3 18.4 18.8 20.6 17.5 18.0 19.5 17.9 20.8 19.5 19.9 19.6 16.3

55-64 183 18.3% 15.7 20.7 18.8 18.1 17.3 19.6 20.2 17.4 19.1 17.5 13.8 19.1 27.7 18.9 19.8 14.0

65+ 173 17.3% 16.8 17.8 16.9 17.3 21.4 13.4 18.6 15.8 14.3 17.1 13.2 23.6 21.4 18.4 16.1 19.6

PAGE 4



Table 1-5


BANNER 5 - EDUCATION/HEALTH CARE

Public Library

=========================== ACA

Q27 Edu Q28 Good Q29 My Dist. Q30 Preschol =========================== Q35 78K

Opp. for All Resource Add. Tax Enhances Q31 Fund Q32 Coverage Q33 Age 26 Q34 Continue Provide

============= ============= ============= ============= Preschool Preexist Parent Insur YHI Access

Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- ============= ============= ============= ============= =============

Total N Total % Agree agree Agree agree Agree agree Agree agree Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Favor Oppose

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 828 123 817 127 444 492 754 207 540 437 874 103 759 225 512 301 708 220

18-29 197 19.7% 20.1 22.0 20.3 20.3 24.1 15.8 20.9 17.2 21.5 17.6 19.4 23.6 20.8 16.3 20.3 20.5 21.2 17.7

30-44 258 25.8% 27.0 18.4 26.8 21.3 27.2 24.9 27.6 21.6 30.7 20.6 25.5 29.0 25.9 25.4 26.2 24.4 25.6 28.3

45-54 188 18.8% 18.1 22.8 18.9 19.2 17.3 20.6 19.3 17.1 17.1 20.4 18.9 19.6 19.5 17.6 17.5 20.4 18.1 18.5

55-64 183 18.3% 17.8 20.5 16.9 24.2 16.4 20.2 17.9 19.6 16.5 20.6 19.0 11.9 18.2 18.2 19.4 17.3 17.7 19.1

65+ 173 17.3% 17.1 16.3 17.0 14.9 15.0 18.5 14.4 24.4 14.2 20.8 17.3 15.9 15.6 22.5 16.6 17.4 17.4 16.4

PAGE 5



Table 1-6


BANNER 6 - REFUGEES/CLIMATE CHANGE

Climate Change

Refugee ======================================================= Q43

=========================== Q41 Diversity Q44 More Imp Q45A/B

Q36 Q37 ID Econ Q40 Concerned? Q42 Caused By Energy Sourc Energy Nuclear

Resettle ID ============= Happening ==================== ==================== ============= ============= Energy

============= Bene- ============= Not Natral Human Equ- Not Renew- Keep =============

Total N Total % Favor Oppose fit Burden Yes No Very SW At All Change Activ ally Imp Imp able Curent Favor Oppose

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 511 438 388 488 720 237 295 301 121 108 254 350 925 57 391 565 596 315

18-29 197 19.7% 22.9 16.7 22.6 17.5 19.7 21.3 18.5 21.8 17.5 15.7 20.4 20.7 19.6 24.2 24.1 17.6 20.9 16.7

30-44 258 25.8% 31.2 20.7 30.9 22.0 27.6 21.1 27.3 29.6 23.6 20.6 28.1 30.0 26.0 26.8 26.6 25.0 27.3 23.2

45-54 188 18.8% 16.0 21.1 15.0 22.8 18.9 17.3 16.0 19.4 24.7 26.5 17.0 17.4 18.8 17.8 16.6 20.3 17.2 21.4

55-64 183 18.3% 16.5 20.3 17.5 18.3 17.3 20.8 20.7 13.6 18.0 19.8 18.4 15.6 18.6 16.6 18.7 17.5 16.5 22.3

65+ 173 17.3% 13.4 21.3 14.1 19.4 16.4 19.5 17.5 15.6 16.2 17.5 16.2 16.3 17.1 14.7 14.0 19.6 18.0 16.4

PAGE 6



Table 1-7


BANNER 7 - FARMLAND

Q46 Farmland Q47-Q51 1-3 Ratings Q47-Q51 4-7 Ratings Q47-Q51 8-10 Ratings

to Housing ================================== ================================== ==================================

==================== Scenic Enviro Histrc Econ Save Scenic Enviro Histrc Econ Save Scenic Enviro Histrc Econ Save

Total N Total % 1-3 4-7 8-10 Value Qual Value Value Farm Value Qual Value Value Farm Value Qual Value Value Farm

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 94 347 513 125 68 148 71 50 387 306 400 356 202 450 580 403 516 722

18-29 197 19.7% 20.6 22.4 18.1 22.4 16.3 19.4 13.0 15.0 21.9 22.0 22.7 21.4 20.6 17.0 18.9 17.2 19.5 19.8

30-44 258 25.8% 33.5 22.7 26.1 33.7 37.6 34.4 41.1 43.7 26.8 23.4 25.5 26.6 28.0 23.3 26.4 23.7 24.3 23.8

45-54 188 18.8% 19.2 19.6 18.9 19.5 13.6 19.3 14.5 14.7 17.9 20.9 18.1 18.2 22.7 20.1 18.5 20.2 19.4 18.3

55-64 183 18.3% 15.1 17.9 20.1 17.4 20.9 18.0 18.6 12.3 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.3 14.5 19.4 19.2 19.1 19.6 20.2

65+ 173 17.3% 11.6 17.5 16.7 7.1 11.6 8.9 12.8 14.2 15.6 15.7 15.7 16.4 14.2 20.3 17.1 19.8 17.2 17.9

PAGE 7



Table 1-8


BANNER 8 - FARMLAND/DEMOGRAPHIC

Q52 Farm Q4 Best Describes

Preservation Q3 Vote ==================== Q5 Q57 Education Q59 Child Q60 Income

Program ============= Moved Most Recent Lived ==================== Under 18 ====================

============= Not Whole Came Moved ==================== High Coll- Grad ============= $50K- Over

Total N Total % Favor Oppose Likely Likely Life Back Here CA WA UT School ege School Yes No



Table 1-9


BANNER 9 - DEMOGRAPHIC

Q58 Religion

=======================================================

Non-

Main- Denom Q61 Gender Q63 Phone

Cath- stream Chris- Ath- No ============= =============

Total N Total % olic Prot Mormon tian Jewish eist Other Relig Male Female Land Cell

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 115 209 181 198 5 76 57 106 497 503 587 413

18-29 197 19.7% 17.3 11.1 22.6 20.5 0.0 45.1 10.4 24.7 19.6 19.8 9.1 34.8

30-44 258 25.8% 20.9 22.7 29.9 26.8 0.0 34.9 21.3 28.9 25.9 25.7 16.7 38.8

45-54 188 18.8% 19.8 21.8 12.1 23.7 18.9 10.4 20.6 17.7 16.4 21.3 22.9 13.1

55-64 183 18.3% 22.6 20.4 16.5 13.7 59.5 6.9 22.7 19.2 18.8 17.9 27.9 4.7

65+ 173 17.3% 19.4 23.9 18.9 15.3 21.6 2.8 24.9 9.6 19.4 15.3 23.5 8.6

PAGE 9



Table 1-10



Q62 Area Breaks

===================================================================================

Rest Idaho Spok- Koot- Rest Twin Twin Rest

Boise Ada Canyon Boise Falls SLC ane enai Spok- Falls Falls Twin

Total N Total % MM County County Mkt Mkt Mkt. MM County ane MM County Falls

------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 1000 1000 442 239 107 96 257 20 197 70 127 84 54 30

18-29 197 19.7% 19.1 20.5 21.9 12.5 21.6 15.6 18.7 19.9 18.1 20.1 20.4 19.5

30-44 258 25.8% 29.4 35.4 29.3 14.6 25.8 19.7 18.8 18.6 18.9 24.6 25.4 23.0

45-54 188 18.8% 16.7 14.0 15.3 25.1 15.5 34.7 29.3 32.8 27.3 11.8 11.0 13.3

55-64 183 18.3% 15.6 14.1 12.3 23.0 20.1 20.4 16.8 12.8 18.9 30.3 24.2 41.1

65+ 173 17.3% 19.1 15.9 21.1 24.9 16.9 9.5 16.4 15.9 16.7 13.2 18.9 3.1

PAGE 10



Table 1-11



Q1 Age Men Women

============================================================== =========================== ===========================

Total N Total % 18-29 30-44 45-54 55-64 65+



Table 2-1

Q2. And before we begin, please tel

***gs strategy group boise state university idaho ... · ***gs strategy group boise state...

Documents

gs strategy group boise state university idaho ... · gs strategy group boise state...