hagia sophia architecture

36
If the earth was a single state Istanbul would be its capital . -Napoleon Bonaparte

Upload: mohammedmazin

Post on 17-Jul-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


18 download

DESCRIPTION

Summarizing the history of Hagia Sophia, architectural style and structural system.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hagia Sophia Architecture

If the earth was a single stateIstanbul would be its capital .

-Napoleon Bonaparte

Page 2: Hagia Sophia Architecture

Index

*Intro 2392331

*History* Architecture Character*Structure*References

Page 3: Hagia Sophia Architecture

1

T R U L YA

M A G N I F I C E N T A N C I E N T M E G A S T R U C T U R E

Page 4: Hagia Sophia Architecture

Intro

Architectural type : Byzantine

Location : Istanbul , North western Turkey ( Constantinople )

Designers : Isidore of Mieltus & Anthemius of Tralles

Material : Ashlar , Brick

Diementions : Length : 82 meter (269 ft)

Width : 73 meter (240 ft)

Height : 55 meter (180 ft)

History : Eastern Orthodox Cathedral (573 - 1204 A.D)

Cathdox Church Cathedral (1204 - 1261 A.D)

Eastern Orthodox Cathedral (1261 - 1453 A.D)

Imperial Mosque (1453 - 1931 A.D)

Museum (1931 - present )

2

Page 5: Hagia Sophia Architecture

History

3

Page 6: Hagia Sophia Architecture

HistoryLocation : Hagia Sophia is located in Istanbul Turkey( Constantinople )

Constantinople map

And the Hagia Sophia means “Holy wisdom”

The mystical city Istanbul hosted many civilizations since centuriesWhich Byzantium and Ottoman Empires were bothThe most famous ones .

Hagia Sophia Is one of the great Architectural building for bothByzantine Empire

4

Page 7: Hagia Sophia Architecture

Hagia Sophia Time Line

Constantine's Church (360 A.D) : Known as The Great Churchits the first Church built at the same location where was there A pagen temple , It was Constantius II who ordered to buildThe Church there about (360 A.D).

This church was largely burned down in (404 AD)

Theodosius II's Church (405 A.D) : after the Constantine's (great church) was destroyed , Theodosius II ordered it to be repairedAnd he opened it again in (405 AD)

The church was completely destroyed during the Vandalism Of the Nika Revolt in (532 A.D)

5

Theodosius II's Church

Page 8: Hagia Sophia Architecture

6

Hagia Sophia Time Line

Justinian's Church ( Hagia Sophia ) (532 A.D) : after the Destruction of The second church, Justinian the Great ordered to rebuildWhat was damaged and destroyed but , the people wereAgainst him because of the high taxes he has imposed

In (532 A.D) the cathedral was constructed by 2 teams of 5000Workers each lead by 50 masters. The work began on clearingThe site after its destruction . He needed to keep the public fromRioting against him and restore faith in his reign.A major building project is a great way to occupy the idle handsHe also wanted his new cathedral ready as quick as possible,

He turned to two men skilled in science and mechanics To design the cathedral .Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles

Page 9: Hagia Sophia Architecture

7

Hagia Sophia Time Line

Hagia Sophia Mosque : About a thousand years laterin 1453 A.D , The Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, Mehmet II after they invasion Constantinople ,He directly went to the ancient Byzantine cathedral ofHagia Sophia When he saw a man hacking the stones of the church and saying that this was a temple for infidels Lets destroy it .Mehmet II ordered the looting to be stopped andThe church to be converted into a mosque.

Page 10: Hagia Sophia Architecture

8

Hagia Sophia Time Line

Hagia Sophia Museum : Nowdays the mosque has been converted into a museum.

Page 11: Hagia Sophia Architecture

9

Architecture Character

Page 12: Hagia Sophia Architecture

10

Page 13: Hagia Sophia Architecture

ArchitectureCharacter

11

In the exteriors the grouping of the smaller domes roundThe larger central one was very effective,One of the most remarkable peculiarities of these churchesBeing that the tunnel vault retains it from externally,As in the case of a dome. In no style does the elevationSo closely correspond with the section as in the Byzantine. An attempt was made to render the rough brick exteriorsOf Roman times more pleasing, by the use of bands and Relieving arches of an ornamental character.A Byzantine building consists generally of a brickCarcase or shell, the Wall being sheeted with marble, And the vaults with mosaic, the marble columns andCornices being added on the completion of this shell.The science of construction acquired by the RomansCescended to the Byzantines. The constructionOf the walls with a brick facing and concrete interior Is merely an extension of the Roman system. It was employed not only for walls, But also for vaults, bridges, and a aqueducts.

Page 14: Hagia Sophia Architecture

12

ArchitectureCharacter

The general form of the building being more or less decided; It was necessary to collect monolithic morale shafts, And it was necessary to have a certain knowledge whereSuch might be quarried or otherwise obtained,Before the foundations were prepared, for the columnsDecided the height and points of support of the building.These columns once assured, the body of the structureWas proceeded with, as brickwork shell without furtherDependence on the masons, who were only requiredTo prepare the bases, capitals, and cornices,Everything else being completed as brick “Carcase”.The building was made of vast masses of thin bricks,The mortar composing half of the aggregate,When this had settled down and dried, the walls were sheetedWith their marble covering, the vaults overlaidWith mosaic and the pavement laid down.In this the carcase was completed at once,The bricklayers not having to wait for the masons,And further, by reserving the application of the marbleUntil the contracture was dry and solid.It was possible to bring together unyielding marbleAnd brickwork with large mortar joints that must haveSettle down very considerably. The dependenceOf masonry unequally charged was a loading ideaIn Byzantine contraction.

Page 15: Hagia Sophia Architecture

13

ArchitectureCharacterThe quantity of mortar wasSo great that the brick at the times becomes secondaryIn height to the joints. Brick was the material preferred in The construction of churches; it lent itself best to all theCaprices of the architect. The interiors were always linedWith marble and mosaics, or decorated with paintings.The form the bricks varied infinitely in Byzantine times,But the ordinary brick was like the Roman,An inch and half in thickness, and was always laid upon a bedOf mortar, at least half an inch in thickness.Moulds were used for the pieces forming cornices,And the shafts of columned when of this material were builtOf circular bricks. Brick-making was the feature ofThe Byzantine period. The core of the wall was naturallyOf concrete, as in the Roman period, but the mannerIn which the bricks of the casing were arranged contributedGreatly to the direction of the exterior of buildings. Byzantine architecture was developed by the use of brickIn the frankest and fullest manner, especially inDomical vaulting. Byzantine art is the Greek spiritWorking in Asiatic elements, for the dome on pendentivesWas invented and perfected entirely in the east.

Page 16: Hagia Sophia Architecture

14

ArchitectureCharacterDomed placed over square apartments which is calledPendentives, their based brought to a circle.Whereas in Roman architecture the dome mass as a rulePlaced over a circular apartment. From the time whenThe architect permitted the forms of the vaults andArches to appear in the exterior decoration of the facades,The regular entablatures of the Romans were abandonedAnd in the church of Santa Sophia we see fully developedByzantine style. In the older building of Rome,The columns and entablatures could be and have beenRemoved without causing the ruin of the building.In Santa Sophia, the construction is reverted.It is columns and capitals being not merely ornamental,But really supporting the structure.

Page 17: Hagia Sophia Architecture

15

ArchitectureCharacterIn continuation of Greek principles the capitals even assumeA novel form, appropriate to their new propose of receivingThe springer of arches, the voussiors of which were alwaysSquare, and not set in receding planes as in so calledGothic architecture. The problem was to bring the archAnd column to support the arch. This was done by shapingThe block of marble which formed the capital so that aSimple transition from the square block to the circle of theColumn was formed. There were 4 main types of capitalUsed by the Byzantines, and these are formed inSanta Sophia. The numerous round shafts of Santa SophiaExhibit a remarkable and beautiful structural expenditure,By which the necking is entirely suppressed.And bronze annulets surround the shafts under the capitalAnd above the base. This method prevents the shaftsFrom sliding or splitting, and retains the lead beds fromBeing forced out by the weight, for large monolithic shafts,As they had to be set up contrary to the direction of theQuarry strata. In Byzantine, ornamental and structureWere intimately united.

Page 18: Hagia Sophia Architecture

16

ArchitectureCharacterIn the Byzantine period no churchWas founded in which mosaic did not add it splendourTo that of sculpture and perilous stones.In Byzantine buildings, then, the logical outcomeOf Roman methods of construction is seen;Dome and vault are freed from the trabreated system,And advanced to the dignity of a style through theAcceptance of a novel principle and the discovery of anArchitectural expression suited to it. The use of roughAnd small materials involved the constructive principleOf the arch, dome, and vault and these formsWere the elements of the new style.

Page 19: Hagia Sophia Architecture

17

ArchitectureCharacter

Hagia Sophia at Constantinople :The plan consists of a central space bounded by four massivePiers, 25 feet square , connected by semicircular arches ,And supporting a dome ofc 107 feet in diameter ,Ising above the pavement.

The base of this dome is pierced by 40 small windows ,lighting the central area. Against the eastern and westernArches of the dome abut half-domes , thus a long ovalInterior is formed. Within the depth of the south andNorth arches are galleries in 2 storeys , The upper being for women. In the spandrel walls , Which stand up on the front line of the gallery arcades ,Are ranged tiers of narrow windowsGiving additional light to the interior.

Page 20: Hagia Sophia Architecture

18

ArchitectureCharacter

In the exteriors the grouping of the smaller domes roundThe larger central one was very effective,One of the most remarkable peculiarities of these churchesBeing that the tunnel vault retains it from externally,As in the case of a dome. In no style does the elevationSo closely correspond with the section as in the Byzantine. An attempt was made to render the rough brick exteriorsOf Roman times more pleasing, by the use of bands and Relieving arches of an ornamental character.A Byzantine building consists generally of a brickCarcase or shell, the Wall being sheeted with marble, And the vaults with mosaic, the marble columns andCornices being added on the completion of this shell.The science of construction acquired by the RomansCescended to the Byzantines. The constructionOf the walls with a brick facing and concrete interior Is merely an extension of the Roman system. It was employed not only for walls, But also for vaults, bridges, and a aqueducts.

Page 21: Hagia Sophia Architecture

19

ArchitectureCharacter

The abutment of these side arches of the dome ,Not having half-domes resting against them ,Is taken by huge external buttresses.Out of these rectangular angles being filled it with domes .In front of the outer narthex is an entrance court surroundedBy a colonnade. The great piers are constructed of squaredStones , the rest of the building is of brickwork.Internally the walls, piers , and floor are lined with colouredMarbles fixed to the walls by metal cramps , the vaultsAre enriched with mosaics of the apostlesand angels on aGolden ground , and the columns are of the precious andMany- colored marbles , with bronze ringsConnecting the shafts with capitals and bases.

Page 22: Hagia Sophia Architecture

20

ArchitectureCharacter

Externally , the vaulting of the domes is visible ,Being covered with lead 0.25 inch thick resting on woodenBattens placed immediately on the brick vaults.The minarets, shown in the illustrations ,Have of course been added in Mohometan times.The mosaics are partially covered up and replacedBy quotations from the Quran.

Page 23: Hagia Sophia Architecture

21

ArchitectureCharacter

Hagia Sophia is the masterpiece of Byzantine architecture asThe Parthenon is of Greek or the pantheon of Roman.Foundation stone laid by Justinian A.D. 532 ,The central dome is 107 feet in diameter ,And surrounded by 4 arches abutting on masses ofMasonry 75 feet long and 25 feet wide. East and westAre semi-domes.Santa Sophia was used as a mosque and is covered withSaracenic decorations.The exterior is in Brick. And now used as a museum.

Page 24: Hagia Sophia Architecture

22

ArchitectureCharacter

Page 25: Hagia Sophia Architecture

23

Structure

Page 26: Hagia Sophia Architecture

24

Structure Hagia Sophia has gigantic central space of 31m² marked out by four great peers. To span an area the size of Hagia Sophia's dome, the building material needed to be exceptionally light.

The dome of Hagia Sophia is 56m high and over 31m across. It spans a nave 3 times wider than any gothic cathedral.

They had to think of a way to placethe round dome onto the square base created by the piers.

The dome sits on top of 4 greatarches in the center of the cathedral each 31m wide but the dome sits directly on the top most point of each arch. But without additional support, it would crack and collapse upon itself.

Plan of Hagia Sophia

Section of Hagia Sophia

Nave

Dome

Page 27: Hagia Sophia Architecture

25

Structure A dome suspended over the square baseto mark the nave. Means putting acircular structure on top of a square structure. And the architects solved thisby using pendentives.

This was the first time that pendentives such as those has been used to support a dome. The triangular pendentives were concave mincing the curve of the dome. They also counter acted the tendency of the dome into the piers that supported the arches channeling the weight down to the ground.

They took a rectangular structure and put pendentives in it and change it into a circular structure and on top of the circular structure they built a cylinder and on top of the cylinder the put the dome. (how the first dome was built)

The arches had to be massive which created problems. Because the arches generate significant horizontal thrust at the bottom. So the arch goes down and the bottom kick out. (The cathedral was 140m long)

They made an extension at either end and roofing it with a half dome, which gives support to the main arch.. They also added smaller semi dome, doubling the length of the nave without increasing the span of the supporting infrastructure.But they needed light material to build the dome, so they imported special lightweight bricks from Rhodes.

Pendantives

Page 28: Hagia Sophia Architecture

26

Structure The mortar between the bricks is thicker than the bricks and contains an amount of crushed bricks. It is made of the same material of the bricks resulting in a very strong bond between the bricks and the mortar. But still, the weight of the dome exerts a great load on the supporting piers pushing them out of alignment.

On either sides of the nave, two access passages ran the entire length of the building, and directly above these were another two corridors lined by colonnades.

The arches that form the corridor were built into the structural piers that hold up the dome. These arches were extended across the corridor to create four huge buttresses that channeled the thrust of the dome down to the ground absorbing the huge weight above them.

Many of the features of the cathedral were made with stone which adds to the weight of the building resulting in more pressure on the over loaded structure.

Mortar

Stone

Page 29: Hagia Sophia Architecture

27

Structure

The original plan has been to duplicate the width of the colonnade from the ground level in the gallery above. But that changed. When the building reached the upper level of the structure, the designers shortened the colonnade and altered the position of the upper pillars. (Maybe they couldn’t fine columns large enough for the upper level of the cathedral. Or the more reasonable explanation is that they wanted to finish it in a shorter amount of time.)

The columns of the cathedral were made of marble, but they couldn’t afford to crave all of the columns from scratch, so they had to cut corners. At each end of the Hagia Sophia’s nave is a set of giganticcolumns, some of them are at least 30 cm shorter than the others because they might have been reused.

Original Plan Changes

Page 30: Hagia Sophia Architecture

28

Structure The weight of the arches started pushing the piers out of shape. The designed some of the piers to act like buttresses absorbing the weight of the dome and the arches supporting it. But as the weight of the great arches pressed upon them, the weak points began to shear. To solve that, they added reinforced arches within the existing buttress piers, they also have increased the height of the piers adding additional cross bracing and filling in the upper most arch to give it strength, but that wasn’t enough. We can see today how the weight of the dome tilted the columns outwards. The solution for that was a set of projections that can be seen outside of the cathedral, they work on deflecting the outward thrust of the piers down into the ground.

Page 31: Hagia Sophia Architecture

29

Structure Due to the outward thrust of the walls, now meant the base on whichthe dome rests on is no longer square. Because of that, a perfect circle was impossible, so they had to build an elliptical dome with a shallow curve that could span the uneven dimensions, it sat on top of a cylinder which allowed light to go inside the dome, but it was unstable. It stood for 20 years until it was shaken by a massive earth quake that caused the dome to crack. A team of workers worked on repairing the damage. In 558 A.D, while the repairing was taking part, another earthquake caused the eastern part of the vault to fall down. The dome collapsed.

Later on, the dome was replace and they realized the core of the problem was the cylinder in which the dome was sitting. Getting rid of the cylinder would get rid of the weak link in the structure. So they remodeled the upper part in the north and the south arches altering the distance the dome needed to span. If the dome was made a perfect half sphere, the weight bearing down on the pendentives would no longer channel properly into the support, so they adjusted the radius of the dome to match the angle of the pendentives, which made it a more stable. (It took 4 years to repair the dome)They also built shock absorbers into the columns using Lead to base to colonnade base and also the capitals, which allows it to be flexible.

Page 32: Hagia Sophia Architecture

30

Structure

Page 33: Hagia Sophia Architecture

References

*National geographic Megastructures Istanbul's Hagia Sophia(Video)

*A history of architecture on the comparative way (P .192 - 203)(Banister F. Fletcher)

*www.hagiasophia.com*Web sites for images

31

Page 34: Hagia Sophia Architecture
Page 35: Hagia Sophia Architecture
Page 36: Hagia Sophia Architecture