handbook for completing course outlines · advanced study of the ... the secret and soul of...

MM13: Advanced Societal Issues in Marketing

COURSE OUTLINE

Semester Two 2013

MM13 Advanced Societal Issues in Marketing

2

Paper Description and Aims ........................................................................................................................................... 3

Intended Learning Outcomes ........................................................................................................................................ 3

Teaching Staff ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Course Delivery ................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Expectations and Workload ........................................................................................................................................... 4

Course Materials................................................................................................................................................................. 5

Materials and Resources .................................................................................................................................................. 6

Blackboard ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Assessment .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Assessment Grid................................................................................................................................................................. 8

Assessment Details ........................................................................................................................................................ 10

Safe Assign ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12

Course Requirements .................................................................................................................................................... 12

Class Representatives .................................................................................................................................................... 13

Dishonest Practice and Plagiarism ........................................................................................................................... 13

Concerns about the Course ......................................................................................................................................... 13

Disclaimer .......................................................................................................................................................................... 13

2011 Policy on Student Internal Assessment ........................................................................................................ 14

2011 Policy for Special Consideration in Final Exams......................................................................................... 15


3

Paper Description and Aims

Advanced study of the relationships between marketing, public policy, and social and environmental values are examined with reference to legal issues.

MM13 explores social and regulatory questions that affect marketing practice. In every society, a

balance exists between government, business and individuals; however, deciding where this

balance should lie requires a careful and critical examination of research evidence. The paper will

explore competing arguments, examine the merits and effectiveness of education, social marketing

and regulation, and apply these to current debates in marketing and public policy.

Semester Two 0.0834EFTS 10 Points

Prerequisites: 72 300-level MART points (including MART 301 & 307), or HOD approval.

Intended Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this paper, you should be able to:

Critically analyse whether and how risk behaviours should be modified, and the evidence

supporting different approaches. In addition, they will have applied this knowledge to social

behaviour change campaigns.

Provide an evaluation of the “individual responsibility” argument, its implications for modifying

risk behaviours, and the extent to which it should be accepted.

Review and critically evaluate the logic of alternative interventions and how effective these

have proved.

Evaluate competing arguments about specific topics, including the logic and likely effects of

and introducing plain packaging on all tobacco products; the effectiveness of messages

promoting moderate alcohol consumption and “healthy” eating, and the logic and effects of

front of pack nutrition labelling.

The paper also aims to enhance skills that students will find invaluable whether working as

marketing professionals or as advanced post-graduate students. These include analysing the

evidence base used to support interventions, evaluating different approaches to addressing social

problems, presenting and defending ideas, and critically evaluating others’ opinions. Classes will

initially be led by the paper co-ordinator or a guest speaker, but all students are expected to bring

examples for discussion each week. All classes will be structured as seminars where everyone is

expected to participate, assimilate new ideas and develop a critical, informed stance toward these.

Students are expected to prepare for class by reading the articles set for each seminar (see

reading list), participating actively in the discussions, and bringing examples for class discussion.


4

Teaching Staff

Lecturer / Paper Coordinator Name: Janet Hoek Office: CO6.18 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Please refer to Blackboard You should contact the me if you have any administrative enquiries about the paper.

Lecture Day/Time: Monday 14:00-15:50 Room: CO 6.26

Course Delivery

Every week students must prepare for, attend and participate actively in a two hour seminar

discussion.

The course calendar (in this outline and online on Blackboard) details semester dates, lecture topics,

labs, tutorials and assessment related scheduling information. Note that this calendar may change

as the course proceeds. I will advise any changes at seminars and on Blackboard.

Students must prepare for and attend all classes to gain full benefit from the course

Please check Blackboard regularly and review the information provided. If you cannot attend a

seminar, you must take responsibility for obtaining any material covered in that class. Notes used in

seminars will not be posted on Blackboard. Unless stated otherwise, all aspects of the course are

examinable.

Expectations and Workload

Societal Issues in Marketing is a 10 point paper taught in S2. The University guidelines suggest

students can expect to spend about two hours working per week, per three points, for a single semester

paper. You should anticipate spending an average of 6-8 hours per week on this subject; I suggest

you allocate your time as follows:

ACTIVITY TIME ALLOCATION /Week

Class time 2 hours

Reading and preparation for class 3 hours

Participation in website discussions 0.5 hours

Assessment (assignment preparation and test revision) 1.5 hours


5

Course Materials

MM13 does not have a set text. I have provided a comprehensive list of readings in the tables on the following pages.


6

MATERIALS AND RESOURCES: These readings are a starting point that I hope will introduce you to a subject area, stimulate you to consider some research questions, and help you develop some ideas about a topic that you would then like to research further. Other readings will be provided throughout the paper.

Week Topic Readings 1 Introduction Introduction to class and topics to be explored. Please note formal seminars do not commence until

week 4 of the semester. 4 Individual responsibility – what does it mean? Chapman, S., Liberman, J. 2005. Ensuring smokers are adequately informed: Reflections on consumer

rights, manufacturer responsibility, and policy implications. Tobacco Control 14, 8-13. Michaels, D., Monforton, C. 2005. Manufacturing uncertainty: Contested science and the protection of the public’s health and environment. American Journal of Public Health 95 (S1), S39-S48. Stevenson, T., Proctor, R. 2008. The secret and soul of Marlboro: Phillip Morris and the origins, spread, and denial of nicotine freebasing. American Journal of Public Health 98, 1184-94. Hastings, G., Stead, M., Webb, J. 2004. Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 961–986.

5 Tobacco control – the logic of plain packaging? Freeman, B., Chapman, S., Rimmer, M. 2008. The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction, 103 (4), 580-590. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, Louviere J, Cong K. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tobacco Control 2011;20(3):183-88. Gendall, P., Hoek, J., Edwards, R., Gifford, H., Thomson, G., Pirikahu, G., Pene, G., McCool, J. (2011). Young adults’ interpretations of tobacco brands: Implications for tobacco control. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 13 (10), 911-918.

6 Guest speaker – Smoking – Not Our Future Campaign.

Hoek, J., Newcombe, R. & Walker, S. (2011). An evaluation of a smokefree social norms campaign. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 1, 58-64. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.11.008

7 Alcohol moderation – education, social marketing and regulation

Casswell, S. 2004. Alcohol brands in young peoples' everyday lives: new developments in marketing. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 39(6), 471-476. Casswell, S., Maxwell, S. 2005. Regulation of alcohol marketing: a global view. Journal of Public Health Policy, 26 (3), 343-358. Hoek, J and Jones, S. (2011). Regulation, Public Health and Social Marketing: A Behaviour Change


7

Trinity. Invited (peer-reviewed) "discipline leader" paper. Journal of Social Marketing, 1 (1), 32-44.

8 Food marketing and obesity – what is the evidence?

Schwartz, M. B., Brownell, K. D. 2007. Actions necessary to prevent childhood obesity: creating the climate for change. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(1), 78-89. Nestle, M. 2006. Food marketing and childhood obesity — a matter of policy. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 2527-2529. Seiders, K. and Petty, R. 2004. Obesity and the role of food marketing: a policy analysis of issues and remedies. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23 (2), 153-169. Hoek, J., McLean, R. 2009. Obesity, individual responsibility and deep capture. Paper presented to the 2009 American Marketing Association Marketing and Public Policy Conference, Washington DC, May 29-31.

9 Food labeling Maubach, N. and Hoek, J. (2010). A qualitative study of New Zealand parents’ views on front-of-pack nutrition labels. Nutrition and Dietetics. 67: 90–96. Sacks G, Tikellis K, Millar L, Swinburn B. Impact of 'traffic light' nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health 2011:DOI: 10.1111/j.753-6405.2011.00684.x.

10 Seminar presentations Schedule to be announced

12 End of Module Test


8

Blackboard

Blackboard https://blackboard.otago.ac.nz/webapps/login/ provides you with access to course

materials, and I will post any class notices on Blackboard. Please ensure you check your student

email and Blackboard regularly, or use PIMS to redirect your emails to your personal account. You

will find helpful links to the Library referencing page, the Student Learning Centre, and writing

resources in Blackboard.

Assessment

All material presented is examinable (except where stated otherwise) by assignments and the final

examination. All important assessment information such as due dates and times, content,

guidelines and so on will be discussed at lectures and, where appropriate, detailed on Blackboard in

the week prior to each assessment. Students are responsible for ensuring that they are aware of

this information, keeping track of their own progress, and catching up on any missed classes.

I have outlined the two pieces of internal assessment below and will provide copies of past final

tests towards the end of the semester.

Assessment Grid

Topics

Assessm

ent

Assessm

ent

Assessm

ent

To

tal

Critical evaluation of topic Due Date: 5pm, TBA

20%

Seminar assignment Due Date: 5pm, TBA

25%

Participation (in class and on BB) 10%

In class test Date: TBA

45%

Total 100%

Please submit all assessment via the BB electronic drop box. Please ensure you receive a

receipt following submission, to ensure your work has been lodged.

https://blackboard.otago.ac.nz/webapps/login/


9

We will discuss the assignment in class where you will have opportunities to clarify any questions

you might have. Please note that ALL discussion about assessment (internal and external) MUST

take place in class or on BB so that all class members have the opportunity to participate.

The grading scheme used at Otago is: A+ 90-100 C+ 60-64 A 85-89 C 55-59 A- 80-84 C- 50-54 B+ 75-79 D 40-49 B 70-74 E <40 B- 65-69

Written Assignment

Please present your assignments as a report. There is no need to include an executive summary.

Your report should have three main sections:

Introduction (short, 2-3 paragraphs containing a brief overview of the following sections).

Discussion (the bulk of your report, containing a detailed analysis of the arguments and ideas

you have encountered. It may be helpful to use sub-sections or headings in the discussion

section to structure your ideas).

Conclusions (short, 2-3 paragraphs, outlining your final recommendations and a summary of the

rationale underpinning these).


10

ASSESSMENT DETAILS:

Assignment One: Critical Evaluation of Tobacco Retailer Licensing Proposals

In July 2012, all stores retailing tobacco products had to place these out of sight. This measure reflected research evidence that the open display of tobacco products is associated with an increased risk of smoking experimentation among children. This law is one of the few to regulate tobacco retailing. The Maori Affairs Select Committee Enquiry into the tobacco industry heard evidence that tobacco retailers should be licensed, reduced in number, and required to provide NRT (nicotine replacement therapy), among other suggestions. These arguments are based on evidence that the ubiquity of tobacco products makes smoking appear normal; that it is anomalous to sell an addictive product without also providing consumers with cessation options, and that licensing would enable health authorities to exert greater control over retailers who transgress regulations (either by not keeping tobacco products hidden, or by selling tobacco to under-age consumers). Several other countries have adopted retailer licensing schemes and New Zealand is now evaluating whether it should also introduce similar regulations. Perhaps predictably, tobacco companies strongly oppose further regulation; they argue they are already highly regulated, claim licensing would simply impose greater compliance costs on retailers , and that on-going ‘denormalisation’ of tobacco products makes smokers appear second class citizens. Finally, they claim licensing would have no effect on smoking prevalence. Minister Turia has asked for your advice and has requested you to review the tobacco companies’ concerns. Specifically, she has asked you to comment on:

The different licensing options available and the implications of these. What are the strengths

and merits of different options and which, if any, would you recommend she implement? She is

also interested to know how reducing the number and location of tobacco retailers would affect

smokers’ behavior and smoking prevalence over time. She would like you to apply models of

consumer behaviour to the retailer licensing debate. Given what we know about consumers’

responses to marketing stimuli and given the addictive nature of nicotine, should we expect

rapid declines in smoking prevalence? If we do not expect smoking prevalence to decline, what

outcomes should we expect and do these justify the introduction of licensing schemes? To what

extent does marketing and consumer behaviour theory support the introduction of retailer

licensing as a tobacco control measure?

To what extent do you think Minister Turia should accept the tobacco industry’s arguments?

She would like you to evaluate the logic on which these are based and the evidence, if any, that

could be used to test the industry’s claims. She is particularly interested in your views on the

government’s role in protecting individuals from themselves and whether, after reviewing the

evidence, you believe the government has a strong case to introduce retailer licensing. Please

ensure that you discuss and justify your recommendations.

I do not mind what reference style you use, but please ensure you apply the style you choose

consistently. If you do not already use EndNote, it might be worth learning how to use this as it

makes reference management much easier.


11

Your assignment should be no more than 1500 words (excluding references).

Please submit your assignment electronically (via the Blackboard drop box); it is due by 5pm.

Assignment Two: Critical Evaluation of Current Issues

I would like to discuss this assignment in class. I am aware that you have a lot of group work and

that the appeal of this can wane, so before I set a group assignment, I would like to obtain your

views on this idea. The suggestion I would like to discuss is that you work in groups of 3 to explore a

current issue involving marketing and with the potential to have societal effects. This may be a

more in-depth exploration of a topic discussed in class (if so, you would need to go well beyond the

material covered in class) or it could be a topic that holds particular interest to you. Examples might

include proposals to increase the drinking age to 21; the debate over food labeling, or the effects

(and ethics) of using sales promotions to market to children. You will need to submit a brief

proposal (no more than one page) outlining your topic, key research question(s), and group, and I

will need to approve your topic before you commence work on your assignment (this is simply to

ensure your topic has a reasonable body of literature and that you have defined it tightly).

Your task will be to address the research questions you have defined and to present and evaluate the debate around these questions. You will need to read widely and identify the different perspectives that exist, then you will need to evaluate the evidence you have identified and reach some conclusions about the questions and how you believe policy makers should respond to these. Your assignment is worth 25%; 15% will be allocated to the written assignment and 10% to your presentation. Your assignment should be no more than 1200 words (excluding references). Please note that the Department’s policy on group work will apply. Please submit your assignment electronically (via the Blackboard drop box); it is due by 5pm. All reports are due on the same date. Seminar presentation dates and times will be coordinated in class.


12

Grading Criteria

The main criterion for assessing your work will be the level of critical thinking you demonstrate. You

will need to read widely to develop, test and support your arguments and you must evaluate the

material you read critically, without necessarily accepting the arguments different authors advance.

Consider the evidence they present, the logic of their claims, and the link between their conclusions

and the data they have collected. Try to identify themes in the papers you read and structure your

work around arguments instead of authors. That is, instead of writing: “A found… B said… C

concluded” try to develop reasoning that explores ideas and the relationships between these. For

example, “Two key arguments dominate the literature. First, the notion that individuals should take

full responsibility for their decision making (A, 2003; C, 2008). However, B (2007) strongly challenges

these claims and instead suggests…” You should work through several drafts before submitting your

assignment and you should proofread your work carefully. Poorly written work will not receive a

good grade. If you have concerns about your ability to write clearly, please use the Student Learning

Services to get feedback on your work.

I will circulate a copy of the grading sheet I use so you know the criteria I will be applying when I

mark your work.

Safe Assign

Please be aware that Safe Assign may be used for assessments in this paper. Safe Assign is a plagiarism detection tool which can report matches between sections of students work submitted to it and material on a comprehensive database to which Safe Assign has access. This includes material on the internet and other student’s assignments which have previously been submitted to Safe Assign. Assignments will need to be submitted to the Final Version Assignment folder in the Blackboard course for this paper. You may submit your assignment to this folder only once. You also have the option of submitting one draft assignment to the ‘Draft Safe Assignment’ folder. If you choose to utilise this option, you will receive the report generated which contains a percentage mark of the paper that matches other sources. Assignments submitted to the ‘Draft Assignment’ folder will not be assessed; however the report will be available for the paper co-ordinator to view. You can find further information on Safe Assign and dishonest practice at: http://www.otago.ac.nz/blackboard/assessing-your-students/anti-plagiarism-safeassign/anti-plagiarism/ http://www.otago.ac.nz/administration/policies/otago003145.html

Course Requirements

There are no terms requirements for this paper. You must pass the final test in order to pass the

paper. Plussage will apply and students whose performance in the final test is better than their

performance in the internal assessment will have their final grade based on their test mark alone.

This policy will not work in reverse.


13

Class Representatives

The class (or student) representative system provides an opportunity for staff and students to

communicate with each other about the teaching and delivery of a paper and gives staff an

opportunity to communicate information and gain constructive feedback from students. It helps

develop a sense of community within a department and adds to the services offered to students.

I will call for volunteers for class representative early in the semester. The OUSA invites all class

representatives to a training session, conducted by OUSA, about what it means to be a class

representative and some of the possible procedures for dealing with issues that arise. They also

provide information on the services that OUSA offers and the role OUSA can play in solving problems

that may occur. The OUSA provides support to class representatives during the semester.

Departmental staff will also meet with class representatives during the semester to discuss general

issues or matters they wish to have considered.

Dishonest Practice and Plagiarism

Students should make sure that all submitted work is their own. Plagiarism is a form of dishonest

practice. Plagiarism is defined as copying or paraphrasing another’s work and presenting it as one’s

own (University of Otago Calendar 2011 page 224). In practice this means plagiarism includes any

attempt in any piece of submitted work (e.g. an assignment or test) to present one’s own work as

the work of another (whether of another student or a published authority). Any student found

responsible for plagiarism in any piece of work submitted for assessment shall be subject to the

University’s dishonest practice regulations which may result in various penalties, including forfeiture

of marks for the piece of work submitted, a zero grade for the paper, or in extreme cases exclusion

from the University. The University of Otago reserves the right to use plagiarism detection tools.

Concerns about the Course

I hope you will feel comfortable coming to talk to me if you have a concern about the course as I

would be happy to discuss any concerns you may have. Alternatively, you can report your concerns

to the Class Representative who will follow up with departmental staff. If, after making approaches

via these channels, you do not feel that your concerns have been addressed, there are University

channels that may aid resolution. For further advice or more information on these, please contact

the departmental administrator or head of department.

Disclaimer

Please note that while I have tried to ensure the information provided in this outline is accurate, I

may need to change it. If this is the case, I will advise you of changes in class and via Blackboard.

Please ensure you check Blackboard regularly as it is your responsibility to ensure you stay fully

informed about the paper.


14

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING 2011 Policy on Student Internal Assessment

The purpose of this document is to have a consistent policy throughout the department as well as to develop students’ time management skills. It reflects usual practices in the business world in which neither success (here: grades) nor deadlines are negotiable. 1. Dissemination of Grades – Regarding internal assessment, class averages and distribution will be displayed graphically by letter

grade for each piece of the assessment. The letter grade only will be returned to the student on their work. At the end of the semester, all internal assessment will be displayed by Student ID with the letter grades for each assignment. All students are requested to check these when posted on the web-based Blackboard – any discrepancies should be reported to the course coordinator as soon as possible.

2. Late Assignments – Assignments received after the deadline and within 24 hours after the deadline will have 25% deducted from

the available grade for the piece of assessment (ie. a 78% becomes a 53%). Assignments received 24 hours and later than the deadline will not be marked and there will be no grade given.

3. Extensions – Extensions will be granted only in exceptional circumstances (eg. illness with supporting medical documentary

evidence stating nature and length of impairment, family emergency, provincial or national representative activities) by the appropriate course coordinator.

If the assignment or internal assessment tests count significantly towards the final result then a formal medical certificate is required. As a guideline, an internal assessment component which counts for 20% of the final result would be considered significant.

4. Tutors and lecturers are not authorised to give extensions. Only the course coordinator should be approached (consult the course

outline for the person(s) responsible).

Computer problems do not constitute an exceptional circumstance unless it is an officially notified failure of university equipment.

5. Plagiarism – Plagiarism is the dishonest use of someone else’s words, facts or ideas, without proper acknowledgement. Most students will include other people’s ideas and information in their work and assignments - such material may be either quoted or digested and used by students. In either case, acknowledgement is essential. Note that the 2011 University of Otago Calendar under Student Conduct Rules Part 1 Section 1 (e) states that no student shall “engage in any dishonest practice as described in regulation 5(b) of the Examinations and Assessment Regulations in connection with an examination or other method of academic work which counts towards the attainment of a pass in any subject.”

6. Problems with group work – Where group work is set and a group is experiencing difficulties, the students should approach their tutor to try to resolve these differences. The tutor will counsel the group, or individuals from the group, on the procedures open to them to resolve group problems (the problem should be raised prior to the work being completed or handed in).

The procedure to be followed is:

i) students should try to resolve the problems within the group without outside assistance.

ii) students should meet with their tutor to endeavour to resolve outstanding issues.

iii) the tutor will arrange for students to meet with the course coordinator who will endeavour to resolve the situation.

This procedure MUST be completed to step iii) before the assignment is submitted for grading. Where there are still unresolved difficulties, step iv) will be implemented.

iv) students will complete a ‘Peer Assessment’ form available from the appropriate course coordinator (which must be submitted to the tutor or course coordinator before any grades are released).

Course Coordinators reserve the right to require all students to complete peer assessment forms at any time during and/or after submission of an assessed group project. Should there be differences in the peer assessment forms, the student(s) will be required to either submit in writing to, or meet with a group comprised of their course coordinator and lecturer(s) and others (as deemed appropriate) to provide an explanation for the discrepancy. A differential allocation of grade may result from this process.


15

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING 2011 Policy for Special Consideration in Final Exams

*** All applications for special consideration must be dealt with through

the examinations office not the department **** The Special Consideration provisions apply only to final examinations and only where it is clearly documented that a candidate has been prevented from taking an examination through illness or other exceptional circumstances beyond his or her control; or has been seriously impaired by illness or other exceptional circumstances beyond his or her control at the time of, or in the 14 day period immediately prior to the examination itself. Where students have been affected by illness or other exceptional circumstances during the teaching period, they are expected to have informed Heads of Departments directly at the time (not individual lecturers or tutors). Process You need to obtain an application form from the University Information Centre or Student Health. You can also download the Application for Special Consideration in Final Examinations form Application for Special Consideration in Final Examinations form If your condition persists and you find that you are still seriously impaired for a later examination, do not submit a second application form, but contact the Examinations Office for advice (+64 3 479 8237). No special arrangements can be made for candidates who fail to attend examinations at the correct time. Deadline: Five calendar days from the date of the last examination for which you are making an application for Special Consideration. Please Note: Applications cannot be accepted without supporting documentation such as a medical certificate. For further information please see: Health Declaration for Special Consideration Application

Absences

1. A student may be offered an aegrotat pass providing: (a) their grade for internal assessment is C+ or better and (b) the internal grade they have achieved has contained a significant element of individual work as opposed to group

assignments (25% of the total grade for the paper). 2. All other cases will be offered a special examination.

3. In some cases that qualify for an aegrotat, it may be relevant to offer the student the choice of an aegrotat or a special

examination. For example aegrotats at any stage of the course can have a detrimental effect on a student’s ability to qualify for scholarships.

4. Special examinations for Semester One 2011 will be held on (date to be arranged), in the week prior to Semester Two

commencement.

Special examinations for Semester Two 2011 will be held on (date to be arranged), two weeks after cessation of official examination period.

Impaired Performance

1. If the student has no internal assessment there will be no adjustment to the exam mark and only an optional special will be offered.

2. If the student has internal assessment the examination mark may be adjusted by taking account of the discrepancy between the examination and internal marks, with particular attention to individual work for the student in comparison to that for the whole class.

3. In all other circumstances the student will be offered the choice of accepting this mark or sitting a special examination.

4. Once a student accepts to take a special examination the original examination mark is nullified and the result of the special examination replaces the original mark, even if it is lower. Any absence or impairment for the special examination must be covered using the same regulations as apply for normal university examinations.

http://www.otago.ac.nz/services/uic.html

http://www.otago.ac.nz/studenthealth

http://www.otago.ac.nz/prodcons/groups/public/documents/webcontent/otago001756.pdf

http://www.otago.ac.nz/study/exams/Special%20Consideration%20Health%20Declaration.pdf

handbook for completing course outlines · advanced study of the ... the secret and soul of...

Documents