hardt cup 2013

34
Hardt Cup 2013 March 18 – April 8

Upload: tress

Post on 25-Feb-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Hardt Cup 2013. March 18 – April 8. Hardt Cup Coordinators. Doug Hollins Jules Mugema Zi -Xiang Shen [email protected]. What is the Moot Court Board?. Appellate Advocacy at Duke Law Intramural Competitions Jessup Cup Hardt Cup Dean’s Cup Interscholastic Competitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup 2013March 18 – April 8

Page 2: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Coordinators

Doug Hollins Jules Mugema Zi-Xiang Shen [email protected]

Page 3: Hardt  Cup 2013

What is the Moot Court Board?

Appellate Advocacy at Duke Law Intramural Competitions

Jessup Cup Hardt Cup Dean’s Cup

Interscholastic Competitions http://law.duke.edu/students/orgs/mootcourt/

Page 4: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Overview

Oral Argument: the Basics What Is It? Why Do It?

Hardt Cup Format Structure Schedule

How It Works Structure of an Argument Questions

Page 5: Hardt  Cup 2013

The Basics: What Is It?

Oral advocacy is the chance for you to win over the Court Motivate the Court to decide in your favor Demonstrate the strength of your position Resolve questions and concerns

Page 6: Hardt  Cup 2013

The Basics: Why Do It?

Build confidence Learn how to simplify complex legal arguments effectively Set yourself apart

“Moot court or journal preferred” Improve writing and public speaking skills Build relationships with fellow students and with faculty Participate in interscholastic competitions It’s fun!

Page 7: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Format: Round 1

Round 1: March 18 – March 19, March 21 – 22 Everyone competes (that means you!) 2 arguments, 1 night: one as appellant, one as

appellee Compete against people in your LARW section 2-judge panels Judges are 2L and 3L students on the Moot Court

Board 10 minute argument for each side (including 1-2

minute rebuttal)

Page 8: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Format: Round 2

Round 2: March 25 – March 28 Voluntary (deadline to register is 11:59 p.m. on March 22)

Email [email protected] with name and preferred email address Sign-up in person at Hardt Cup Table during Round 1

Same parameters Student judges 1 argument on each side

New case Materials provided via email 48 hours in advance (Case + 4-5 other cases to

use in building your argument) Limited Universe: you can only use the material provided and cannot consult

anyone else 4-6 hours to prepare (don’t skip class!)

Following Round 2, the top 40% of the 1L class will be invited to move on to Round 3

Page 9: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Format: Round 3

Round 3: April 1 – April 3 If you move on to Round 3, you must compete New case (but same parameters as in Round 2)

Board Invitations & Quarterfinals 10% of 1L class will be invited to join the Moot

Court Board Top 8 competitors will move on to Quarterfinals

Page 10: Hardt  Cup 2013

Hardt Cup Format: Final Rounds

Quarterfinals: April 4 Semifinals: April 5 Finals: April 8 Same problem as Round 3 for all subsequent rounds

Panel of 3 faculty judges for quarterfinal/semifinal rounds Panel of 3 federal appellate judges for final round 15 minute arguments (1-2 minute rebuttal) Same rules apply – limited universe, no outside help, no

skipping class

Page 11: Hardt  Cup 2013

How It Works: Scoring

Remember: Moot Court is a competition, a game. Score Sheet available on Hardt Cup website 20 points possible for each argument

10 for style Clarity of presentation Responsiveness to questions Use of appropriate formalities Presence of verbal tics

10 for substance Command of fact pattern Well-supported, reasoned claims Knowledge and understanding of relevant law Substantively correct answers to questions

Page 12: Hardt  Cup 2013

How It Works: Structure

Each side gets 10 minutes Appellant/Petitioner begins

May reserve 1-2 minutes for rebuttal (1 is recommended) If you end early, you may reserve the remaining time for your

rebuttal Appellee/Respondent

No surrebuttal If you end early, you may yield remaining time back to the

court Appellant/Petitioner Rebuts

Focus on 1 (maybe 2) issues for your rebuttal 1 minute goes fast – keep it simple

Page 13: Hardt  Cup 2013

How It Works: Before Your Round

If the room is occupied, knock once and wait for the room to clear If the judges have left when competitors enter the room,

competitors should wait for the judges to knock on the door and re-enter

When judges enter the room, both competitors must stand Judges will often handle paperwork beforehand

Score sheet information Rebuttal time

After formalities have concluded, the judges will signal the appellant/petitioner to approach the lectern and begin

Page 14: Hardt  Cup 2013

How It Works: Your Argument

Introduction Roadmap (Facts) Issue One Issue Two Conclusion Rebuttal (Appellant/Petitioner only)

Page 15: Hardt  Cup 2013

Introduction: “May it please the court…”

Federal Circuit Court (Rounds 1 & 2) Appellant/Appellee “May it please the court, my name is Thurgood Marshall, counsel

for the Appellant, Oliver L. Brown.” Address judges as “Judge Posner” or “Your Honor”

United States Supreme Court (Round 3) Petitioner/Respondent “Mister/Madam Chief Justice, and may it please the court, my name

is Thurgood Marshall, counsel for the Petitioner, Oliver L. Brown.” Address justices as “Justice Kagan” or “Your Honor”

Page 16: Hardt  Cup 2013

Introduction: Rebuttal

After addressing the court and introducing yourself, it’s time to ask for rebuttal “With the court’s permission, I would like to

reserve 1 minute for rebuttal.”

Page 17: Hardt  Cup 2013

Framing Your Argument

This is your chance to shape the issues in your favor and is one of the most important elements of your presentation “This case is about the inherent inequality of segregated school

systems, which stamp a badge of inferiority upon minority children.” “This case is about the principles of federalism and stare decisis,

which counsel this court to affirm its precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson, allowing states to operate separate facilities of equal condition.”

Remember: the judge is less familiar with the case than you are. The framework orients him or her in the area of law at issue.

Be specific, be persuasive Don’t say this case is about “justice, fairness, and equality under the

law.”

Page 18: Hardt  Cup 2013

Prayer for Relief & Roadmap

After framing the issues, it’s time to tell the court what you want and why “This court should REVERSE/AFFIRM the

lower court and hold that the Kansas statute is unconstitutional for two main reasons: “First, because segregated schools can never be

equal; AND” “Second, because segregated schools violate

the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.”

Page 19: Hardt  Cup 2013

(FACTS)

If you are Appellant/Petitioner, be prepared to recite the facts to the judges “Would the court care for a brief recitation of the facts?”

Most judges will say “no” Keep it short & simple

No more than 30 seconds Don’t tell the judges everything that happened – they’ve read

the record; just tell them about the 2-3 most important facts (this should help frame your side)

Appellee/Respondent Only offer facts if Appellant/Petitioner made serious errors with

LEGAL significance

Page 20: Hardt  Cup 2013

Argument

Start with a thesis (like your opening, but with more detail) “First, schools separated on the basis of race can never be equal

because segregation ingrains in minority children a deeply harmful sense of inferiority.”

Substance of your argument Detail for 3-4 minutes Apply facts Utilize the case law

Transition to the second point “Second, segregated school systems violate the Equal Protection Clause

of the 14th Amendment as articulated by this court in Bolling v. Sharpe.” This mirrors the structure of your appellate brief!

Page 21: Hardt  Cup 2013

Timekeeping

During Rounds 1, 2, & 3 One of the judges will keep time He or she will hold up a card at 5 minutes (“5”), 1 minute (“1”), and at the

conclusion of your time (“Stop”) If the “Stop” sign is raised while you are still speaking, stop speaking and ask

for permission to conclude If you are in the middle of a statement, ask, “Your honor, I see that my time

has expired. May I briefly conclude?” If a judge has asked you a question, ask, “Your honor, I see that my time has

expired. May I answer your question and briefly conclude?” Answer as quickly as possible and wrap up

You will be docked points for dragging this out

During the final rounds a bailiff will keep time Look at the bailiff to acknowledge the timecard but do not nod or thank him

(this is distracting to the panel)

Page 22: Hardt  Cup 2013

Conclusion

If you see 1 minute remaining, try to move to your concise conclusion There is no need to ask permission to do this Incorporate your legal conclusions into the result you seek:

“Thus, segregated school systems are unconstitutional regardless of the quality of the buildings and comparability of the teachers’ salaries. It is the inherent inequality of the separation itself which violates the mandate of the 14th Amendment. For these reasons, this court should reverse the court below and hold that the Kansas statute is unconstitutional. Thank you.”

If your time elapses, ask to briefly conclude with a short statement: ONE SENTENCE – “For the foregoing reasons, this court should

REVERSE/AFFIRM the holding of the court below. Thank you.” Your conclusion = your prayer for relief!

Page 23: Hardt  Cup 2013

Rebuttal

This is the Achilles’ Heel of many oralists For the Hardt Cup, 1-2 minutes (1 recommended) Keep it simple: focus on the main issue Begin with: “May it please the court, [Appellee

argues…]” Respond to major legal flaws or implications of the

Appellee’s position Prepare responses, but be responsive to the judges’

questions and the points Appellee makes in the argument

Page 24: Hardt  Cup 2013

Answering Questions (I)

It is important to prepare your argument thoroughly but in most cases, you will spend the majority of your time engaging the judges by responding to their questions

At its heart, oral advocacy is a conversation with the court – be responsive to the judges’ questions and concerns Do not say, “I’ll answer that later in my argument” Part of the skill set is the ability to answer a question directly

and then circle back to the points you want to make Begin your answer with “Yes” or “No” whenever possible

Don’t be evasive: know what you can concede and do not be afraid to do so (judges are testing the limits of your argument)

Page 25: Hardt  Cup 2013

Answering Questions (II)

You only have 10 minutes, so be concise with every answer

Make fluid transitions from answering questions to your argument

Ask for clarification if you do not understand a question One trick is to say, “As I understand your question,

Justice Scalia . . .” and then restate the question This buys you time to think of an answer if needed

Page 26: Hardt  Cup 2013

Speaking to the Court

Be deferential Judges will interrupt you whenever they want If a judge begins, STOP – don’t speak over a judge Judges can be belligerent; they are testing your

composure, so remain cool and confident Address the judges by name: “Yes, Judge

Easterbrook, the case can be distinguished” You can also address them as “Your honor”

Wait until the panel is ready to begin your argument

Page 27: Hardt  Cup 2013

Speaking About Your Opponent

Be polite “Opposing Counsel…” “Appellee/Respondent characterizes this case

as…” Do not accuse your opponent of lying Do not attack your opponent personally

Page 28: Hardt  Cup 2013

Standing at the Lectern

You want the court to focus on your argument, not you Stand up straight Be steady (do not shift your weight so often that it

becomes distracting) Keep your hands at the sides of the lectern and do not

lean on the lectern Hand gestures are acceptable for emphasis but should

be used sparingly so as not to be distracting

Page 29: Hardt  Cup 2013

Presentation Style

Be confident! Speak clearly and slowly Speak naturally Speak respectfully (this is a formal presentation)

Maintain eye contact when possible When responding to a judge’s question, make eye contact with the entire panel Hold eye contact with a judge for a few sentences, then move to the next judge

Don’t read your argument! You should have your opening and conclusion MEMORIZED Refer to notes only if needed Don’t script your argument – prepare an outline/bullet points with relevant case

law to cite

Page 30: Hardt  Cup 2013

How to Prepare (I)

Practice explaining your case out loud in simple terms Practice saying your Introduction and Conclusion aloud.

Focus on making positive points for your side rather than ranting about why the other side is wrong

Outline your argument (1-2 pages) Keep it simple Keep this outline in your folder and refer to it as needed. Try not

to look down if you can avoid it. This is a conversation, not a speech! Anticipate questions and prepare responses

Page 31: Hardt  Cup 2013

How to Prepare (II)

Use the cases! Cite cases to build your interpretation of the law Use the cases to make comparisons and analogies Refer to cases by name. “As the 4th Circuit held in Pittman v.

Hardt . . .” When referring to precedent in the sitting court, say, “As

THIS COURT held in Duke v. Vandenberg . . .” Say the full name of the case the first time, then the

shortened version throughout the remainder of your argument (“Pittman directly addressed this issue”)

Relax and have fun!

Page 32: Hardt  Cup 2013

What to Bring Up With You

Folder with 1-2 page outline of your argument Big font! Bullet Points Avoid writing full sentences. You will end up reading from your

paper instead of engaging with the judges. Ideas:

Table of Authorities from Appellate Brief Short case summaries with key facts List of facts from your case Don’t worry too much about cites to the record. Just know your

facts Roman numerals/numbers to keep your bearings if you get lost!

Page 33: Hardt  Cup 2013

Attire

Business formal attire Dark suit, dress shirt, dress shoes (tie for guys)

Keep your hair out of your face/eyes Again, you want to be remembered for your

argument, not your rad, hot-pink Converses and yellow Wayfarers

Page 34: Hardt  Cup 2013

Questions?

Hardt Cup Website: http://law.duke.edu/students/orgs/mootcourt/hardt/

Talk to us (Doug Hollins, Jules Mugema, Zi-Xiang Shen)

[email protected] Skills Session: Tuesday, March 5 at 12:15pm

(Room 3041)