harmaan ja mustan veden käsittelyvaihtoehdot 28.4.2005 juha kiukas, evac oy
DESCRIPTION
Harmaan ja mustan veden käsittelyvaihtoehdot 28.4.2005 Juha Kiukas, Evac Oy. Onboard waste water treatment is Separation and destruction of organic and inorganic contaminants in the wastewater to comply with the legislation or other quality demands. Onboard Wastewater Treatment. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Onboard waste water treatment is Separation and destruction of organic andinorganic contaminants in the wastewater to comply with the legislation or other quality demands.
Harmaan ja mustan veden käsittelyvaihtoehdotHarmaan ja mustan veden käsittelyvaihtoehdot28.4.200528.4.2005
Juha Kiukas, Evac OyJuha Kiukas, Evac Oy
Page 2
Onboard Wastewater TreatmentOnboard Wastewater Treatment
Waste water effects on receiving waters:Carbon is degraded causing loss of oxygenNutrients (N,P) cause eutroficationPathogens, bacteria, viruses and intestina
parasites => Public health problem
Page 3
RegulationsRegulationsMARPOL 73/78
IMO Res. MEPC.2(VI)
USCG 33 CFR 159 TYPE II MSD
Alaska Title XIV
Biological Oxyg. Demand mg/l
50 0 30
pH No demand No demand 6 - 9
Total Suspended Solids mg/ml
100 (onboard test)
150 30
Faecal coliforms cfu/100ml
250 200 20
Free chlorine No demand No demand BDL
Page 4
Future of marine wastewater treatmentFuture of marine wastewater treatment
Limits will become closer to the land-based => May contain also limits for e.g. nutrients (N,P)
Technology: Robust Stand-alone plant with advanced technology Continuous effluent monitoring with recirculation back
to front-end if not complying the limits
Page 5
Terminology:Terminology:TSS Total suspended solids
BOD5 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Amount of organic matter as consumption of oxygen by respiration within 5 days
FC Faecal Coliforms as an indicator of intestial pathogens
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand, Ultimate amount of organic matter as consumption of oxygen by chemicals
SBOD5 & SCOD Soluble BOD5&COD, analysed after filtration
NH4-N Ammoniacal nitrogen, that normally contributes most of soluble nitrogen in raw wastewater and is oxidised to
nitratein nitrification of aerobic process
Page 6
Nature of contaminants in wastewater:Nature of contaminants in wastewater:
Soluble organic compounds<0.1 um
Colloidal particles0.1-1um
Supracolloidal particles1-100um
BOD5
Some of the colloidal COD
A small part of settleable
Settleable particles>100um
Organics as COD in wastewaters+inorganics
Soluble BOD5
=> Greater proportion of soluble organics are included into BOD5
Page 7
Stages of wastewater treatmentStages of wastewater treatment
Collecting & equalizing
Pretreatment Oxidation Separation Disinfection
Page 8
Special requirements for shipboard Special requirements for shipboard wastewater treatmentwastewater treatment
Ship technical limitations ( space, weight, movements, heat etc. )
Waste water concentrations & peaks Short retention times ( collection & treatment) Availability of chemicals and other consumables Lack of process technical personnell Reliability and redundancy requirements Sludge handling Odor control !!
Page 9
Onboard wastewater:Onboard wastewater:Water: Vacuum
Black
Galley Pulper Accomm.
Grey
Laundry Swimming pool
Concentrations:
High
3.0 gBOD5/l
1.5 gTSS/l
High
2.0 gBOD5/l
2.5 gTSS/l
Extrem.high
10 gBOD5/l
10 gTSS/l
Dilute
0.2 gBOD5/l
0.1 gTSS/l
Dilute
0.3 gBOD5/l
0.3 gTSS/l
Dilute
0.3 gBOD5/l
0.1 gTSS/l
Volume:(for 3500 pax.)
Low
53 m3/day
Medium
175 m3/day
Very low
11 m3/day
Very high
595 m3/day
Medium
158 m3/day
Very high / short flux
105 m3/2 days/month
Faecal coliforms:
Extremely high
Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower
High strength DiluteFaecal contamination Free of faecal contamination
Dividing streams may benefit water treatment process
Page 10
Characteristics of Wastewaters:Characteristics of Wastewaters:Divided streams for 3500 pax ShipDivided streams for 3500 pax Ship
Parameter: Unit:High strength (BW,GaW,FWw)
Low strength
(Acc. GW, LaW)
Flow m3/d 250 750
BOD mg/l 2500 220
TSS mg/l 2600 140
N mg/l 170 17
P mg/l 6 6
=> 75 % of Flow from the low strength streams=> 92 % of BOD5 from the high strength streams=> 95 % of TSS from the high strength streams
Page 11
Design of the wastewater treatment process:Design of the wastewater treatment process:
Knowledge of influent / effluent parameters: Flow parameters and patterns => Peak flow control! Variation of concetrations => Organic peak flow control! Process risks, e.g. toxic substances Effluent limits
Hydraulic design of the process: One or two streams. Equalizing/holding/redundancy requirement Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) of the process Design flux for membranes/DAF/UV etc. various process steps
Page 12
Design of a wastewater Design of a wastewater treatment process:treatment process:
Organic design of the process: Prefiltration rate Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS), Sludge Loading
Rate (F/M),
Sludge age (SRT) etc. various sizing parameters according selected process
Sludge process Holding, dewatering, drying and/or incinerating
Page 13
Conventional or advanced ?Conventional or advanced ?
Shipboardwastewater
treatment
Holding tanks”Physical chemical”
treatmentConventional
Biological treatmentAdvanced waste-water treatment
BW(+GW), smallDilution as solutionChlorine oxydation
95% sure
Space and weightEnvironmental aspect
Limited sailing100% sure solution
BW onlyGravity separation
Results varyCheap
BW + GWClean effluent
High rate processMore expensive
Page 14
PretreatmentPretreatment
Reduced loading by removal of solids => Smaller bioreactor => Less sludge production
Prevention of process failures:
Cause of failure: Risk: Solution:
Hard objects Sludge treatment Catcher unit Fat, oil & grease Membrane fouling Grease separator Hair & lint Clogging of membranes Screen, Macerator
Page 15
Pretreatment:Pretreatment: Relationship between size of
removed particles and BOD5/COD-removal
Proportion of particles < 100 μm could be up to 60 % of TSS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.0
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Diff
eren
tial V
olum
e (%
)
Particle Diameter (μm)
0.4 1 2 4 6 10 20 40 60 100 200 400 1000 2000
Cum
ulat
ive
Vol
ume
(%)
Source EVAC 14.6.2004 Finnclipper
Page 16
Biological Wastewater Treatment:Biological Wastewater Treatment:
Solids enmeshment by flocculating microbes
Raw wastewater
Removal of BODby oxidation
Clean effluent
CO2
Sludge
Page 17
Why AOP cannot be directly usedWhy AOP cannot be directly used
Example 3500 pax ship
If 35 % BOD is removed by ozone, the consumption is 597 kg/d. 2.86 MW electric power is required to produce ozone.
Species Oxidation potential V
Fluorine 3.03
Hydroxyl radical 2.80
Atomic oxygen 2.42
Ozone 2.07
Hydrogen peroxide 1.78
Perhydroxyl radical 1.80
Permanganate 1.68
Hypobromous acis 1.59
Chlorine dioxide 1.57
Hypochlorous acid 1.49
Chlorine 1.36
Page 18
Different biological processesDifferent biological processes Activated sludge
process
Membrane bioreactorprocess (MBR)
Suspended carrier biofilmprocess (SCBP)
Immobilised filter biofilmprocess (e.g. ICB)
Fluidized bio film process
(ASP) (FBR)
Supplier example:
Conventional - many suppliers
Zenon, Hamworthy, Evac, Rochem
Scanship, Hydroxyl Honeywell Degremont
Process description:
Suspended growth & biomass recirculation through sedimentation
Suspended growth & biomassrecirculation through membrane separation
Biofilm growth on suspendedcarrier media
Biofilm growth on immobilisedcarrier media
Biofilm growth on fluidizidedmineral carrier media
Design parameter:-loading rate (kgBOD/m3/d)
1.2 - 1.5
2.0 - 8.0
4.0 - 6.0
2.0 - 4.0
4.0 - 6.0
Page 19
Separation Separation
Settling - biomass & solids are separated by gravity. Lamellas or ”carrier materials” can be used to increase settling efficiency.
Membrane - a fine filter is separating biomass & solids. Ultra- and microfiltration membranes are used for wastewater.
DAF (dissolved air flotation) - air is dissolved to water under pressure. When pressure drops, air creates microbubbles lifting biomass & solids to surface.
Filtration – for example sandfiltration is used to polish solid residues from the processed water stream. Filtration cannot be directly utilized for separation.
Page 20
Post treatment - DisinfectionPost treatment - DisinfectionHygienisation by UV – Needed if effluent do not comply the limits for pathogens
0.0000010.000010.00010.0010.010.1
110
1001000
0 1 2 3 4 5Time in Years
Faec. Col.
106/100 ml
Raw feed Permeate
Effluent samples from MBR with Kubota membranes:
Page 21
Keypoints:Keypoints:
Waste water treatment limits may change in the future on sensitive areas – Baltic sea is one of these areas !
Process risk management with proper process design, flow control & understading of loading parameters
Pretreatment safeguards the process from risks Many process options with same principal
bioprocess
Page 22
Freedom-luokan alusFreedom-luokan alus
Mustalle veden 5 kokoamistankki, yhteensä 90 m3. Kolmessa on neljä ejektoria ja ejektoripumppua, kahdessa viisi. Putket AISI 316L.
Harmaa vesi aina käsiteltävä.
Biologinen preosessi – mikro-organismit käyttävät jäteveden ravintoa elintoiminnoissaan. Syövät myös ravintolsuolat, kuten typen ja fosforit. Aerobit bakteerit hajoittavat ravintoketjun tuottaen aktiivista jätettä, jossa korkea happipitoisuus. Jäte seisontatakin pohjalle ja takaisin esihapetusosaan. Kestää huonosti öljyä ja muita epäpuhtauksia.
Kemiallisessa ensin esihapetus ja kemikaalien lisäys, jolloin orgaaniset ainesosat hajoavat. Kiinteä nousevat pintaa flokiksi, joka nousee pinnalle tai laskeutuu pohjaan sakkana, joka on helppo poistaa. Ongelmana on kemikaalien pääsy veteen.
Page 23
Freedom-luokan alusFreedom-luokan alus
Ultrasuodatuksessa kalvo, jonka huokoisuus mahdollistaa veden ja suolojen läpäiseminen 10 – 20 bar paineella.
Käänteisosmoosissa korkeampi 20 – 70 bar paine. Kalvo ei ole huokoinen vaan ainoastaan puhdas vesi läpäisee sen.
Kalvojen haavoittuvuus edellyttää harmaan veden esikäsittelyä. Esimerkiksi aurinkoöljy haittaa. Lämpötilan on oltava tarkasti oikea.
Ultrasuodatus anteeksiantavampi ja vähemmän energiakulutus. RO kun tarvitaan korkea pouhdistustulos.
Järjestelmän mitoituspohja 340 l / hlö /d.
esikäsittelyssä lieteen saostuminen estetään suodattimilla
Sekoitustankissa runkotankki 168 kuutiota, erillinen sekoitus
Biologinen käsittely. biokalven hengittävä rakenne vähentää kolmanneksen elollisesti kuormasta. Tankkitilavuus 222 kuutiota. Kaksi bioreaktoria.
Page 24
Freedom-luokan alusFreedom-luokan alus
Sen jälkeen vaahvdotuslinjaan, joita kolme. Keskiallinen hyydyttäminen ja saostus. Painovoimaisesti vaahdotuslinjoihin, missä jätemassa erotellaan. 10 % vedestä kierrätetään. Paineen vapautuessa hyydyttyneeseen veteen syntyy mikrokupsia, joiden vaikutuksesta kiinteä partikkelit seinämille, jatkuvatoimiset raapimet.
Viimiestelysuodattimiin pumppujen avulla. Jätevesi hitaaspyörivien rumpujen ympärille. Kiinteä jäte huuhdellaan vaipasta ja johdetaan keräilyrataan ja edelleen jatkoksäittelyyn
UV_modulissa desinfiointi, jossa bakteerikanta tuhoutuu.
Liete ennen UV-modulia kuivausjärjestelmän. Höytykuivain, suodatin poistoilmapuhallin ja höyrypatteri.
Page 25
Freedom-luokan alusFreedom-luokan alus
Suodatus
UV-käsittely
Liete käsiteltäväksi
Sekoitustankki
Pesulavedet
Mustavesi
Vesi lieteen käsittelystä
Käyttövedet
Keitiövedet
Esikäsittelymoduli
Biologinen käsittely
Vaahdotuslinjat
Page 26
Advanced technologiesAdvanced technologies
Dual stream
Electro-coagulation + DAF+Radicals
MEP
Membrane + Electro-coagulation
Evac
Membrane + RO
Rochem
External membrane
Hamworthy, Triqua, Rhodia
Submerged membrane
Evac, Zenon, Triqua, Wahag
Single stream
MBBR + DAF
Hydroxyl, Scanship
Page 27
Two water streams ?Two water streams ?
Smaller footprint Lower weight Lower consumables cost Better sludge dewatering
qualities Improved recycle
possibilities High strenght retrofit
possibility with later upgrade of low strenght
Two separate systems with own control
Two feeding systems needed
Lest cost efficienct for > 1000 persons
More essential spare parts needed
Advantages Drawbacks
Page 28
Divided streams on MBRDivided streams on MBR
Single stream Divided stream
MBR size 100% 75%
Membrane surface area
100% 25%
Investment cost (MBR)
100% 50%
Page 29
MBBR + FlotationMBBR + Flotation
Black Galley Food Accom. Laundry Pool
Equalizing & mixing
Screen
MBBR
Coagulant & Flocculant chemicals
DAF Polishing filter
UV
OverboardSludge Sludge
Page 30
MBR ( Membrane bioreactor )MBR ( Membrane bioreactor )
Black Galley Food Accom. Laundry Pool
Equalizing & mixing
Screens
MBRUV
Overboard
SludgeSludge
Page 31
Why MBR?Why MBR?
Effluent quality: Practically no solids => Crystal clear effluent BOD5 in effluent below 5 mg/l
Low pathogens in effluent without disinfection
Page 32
Membrane variants comparisonMembrane variants comparison
Submerged plates
Submerged hollowfibre
External pressurized
Flux + + ++
Energy ++ + --
Glogging + - +
Proven ++ + +
Sludge levels
++ - +
Page 33
All membranes have a limited lifetimeAll membranes have a limited lifetime
Time
Pressure Permeate flow
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Bar
, m
3/h
)
Page 34
MEP -MarisanMEP -Marisan
Equalizing
Screen
Coagulant & Flocculant
DAF
Bromine & Clorine gen.
Contact tank
Page 35
Evac dual stream processEvac dual stream process
Black Galley Food Accom. Laundry Pool
UV
Electro- coagulation
Lamella clarifyer
Dual screen
MBR UV
Overboard
Page 36
Process comparison > 2000 paxProcess comparison > 2000 pax
Process description
MBBR + flotation
MBR
submergedMBR
external
Electrocoag. + AOP
MBR + electrocoag
.Split
streams
Foot print ++ + + ++ ++
Weight ++ + + ++ ++
Investment cost ++ + - - ++
Yearly operational costs without membrane replacement -- ++ + - +
Lifecycle cost - + -- -- ++
Sludge production & dewatering qualities + - - ++ ++
Effluent quality - ++ ++ -- +
Easiness of operation -- + ++ -- -
Page 37
Process comparison < 1000 paxProcess comparison < 1000 pax
Process description
MBBR + flotation
MBR
submergedMBR
external
Electrocoag. + AOP
MBR + electrocoag
.Split streams
Foot print -- ++ + -- --
Weight -- ++ + -- --
Investment cost -- ++ + -- --
Yearly operational costs without membrane replacement -- ++ + -- --
Lifecycle cost - ++ -- -- --
Sludge production & dewatering qualities Not relevant Not relevant
Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant
Effluent quality - ++ ++ -- +
Easiness of operation -- ++ ++ -- --
Page 38
Sludge handlingSludge handling Sludge from treatment process: Dry solids 2-3% Sludge after decanter centrifuging 17-27%
90% reduction of water
Page 39
Sludge handlingSludge handling
After decanter centrifuging Holding Incinerator Steam dryer Filterpress or alternative sludge conditioning process