harvest volatility management preserving real purchasing power … 0900 harvestva-silva... · 2014....
TRANSCRIPT
Harvest Volatility Management
Preserving Real Purchasing Power in NDTs
J o s h S i l v a
E a r l K l e c k n e r
N u c l e a r D e c o m m i s s i o n i n g T r u s t F u n d
S t u d y G r o u p
2 0 1 4 A n n u a l C o n f e r e n c e
M a y 1 8 - 2 1 , 2 0 1 4
It's really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of
times, people don't know what they want until you show it
to them."
— Steve Jobs
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Issues
One of the key issues for any NDT is the loss of the purchasing power
Many NDTs are underfunded
Purchase power protection will help protect the buying power of the trust from rising inflation
The NRC Escalation Index which adjusts the minimum financial assurance amount continues to be adjusted
upwards to try and keep pace with rising costs
PAGE │ 2
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Labor Costs- Effects on Decommissioning
Labor is 65% of the Escalation Index
Labor force for decommissioning is specialized and if multiple utilities are forced to decommission
simultaneously, the cost could escalate dramatically
Utilizing assets that perform well as interest rates rise to help mitigate the rising costs of labor as interest rates
and labor costs trend closely together
PAGE │ 3
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Energy Costs-Effects on Decommissioning
The Energy Component is 13% of the Escalation Index and is represented by light fuel oil and industrial power
Select a basket of energy assets that are highly correlated to light fuel oil
Utilize utility stocks to represent industrial power
PAGE │ 4
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Burial Costs-Effects on Decommissioning
The Burial Component is 22% of the Escalation Index
This component is constantly under scrutiny as the U.S. government has yet to establish a permanent burial
facility
Present burial sites may not be available in the future
Disposal may therefore add a long tail to decommissioning
This is the hardest component to offset
Using construction costs as a close facsimile, we consider burial cost to be comprised of material cost plus
employment
PAGE │ 5
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Concerns to Modern Investor
1. Gas and food have more than doubled over last 20 years with the last ten years seeing the majority
of the increase
Are we truly in a low inflation world?
2. Loss of purchasing power in low-yield environment
How does an investor hedge loss of purchasing power?
PAGE │ 6
FAO Food Price Index
1990 – 2013Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Price Trends of Consumer Energy Products in Nominal
Dollars, 1990-2012
(Index 1990 = 1.0)
Sources: U.S. DOE/EIA, Annual Energy Review 2010 and Short – Term Energy
Outlook (January 2012)
FAO Food Price Index
1990 – 2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Passive Commodities – Welcome to Six Flags!
Passive investment in commodities has produced 3% returns at a 24% volatility since 2000
High volatility/low returns causes failure as investment options
Low correlation of commodity assets
PAGE │ 7
$1M Invested in GSCI from March 2000 - July 2013
Mar 2000 - Jul 2013 Precious Metals Energy Agriculture Industrial Metals
Precious Metals 1.0000
Energy 0.2755 1.0000
Agriculture 0.3429 0.2422 1.0000
Industrial Metals 0.3661 0.3911 0.3794 1.0000
$0.00
$500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$3,500,000.00
$4,000,000.00
3/1
/2
00
0
9/1
/2
00
0
3/1
/2
00
1
9/1
/2
00
1
3/1
/2
00
2
9/1
/2
00
2
3/1
/2
00
3
9/1
/2
00
3
3/1
/2
00
4
9/1
/2
00
4
3/1
/2
00
5
9/1
/2
00
5
3/1
/2
00
6
9/1
/2
00
6
3/1
/2
00
7
9/1
/2
00
7
3/1
/2
00
8
9/1
/2
00
8
3/1
/2
00
9
9/1
/2
00
9
3/1
/2
01
0
9/1
/2
01
0
3/1
/2
01
1
9/1
/2
01
1
3/1
/2
01
2
9/1
/2
01
2
3/1
/2
01
3
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
TIPS – The Great Unknown
PAGE │ 8
Treasury Inflation Protected
Bonds (TIPS) provide
protection against CPI
With yields now above 2%,
can they provide protection
against rising rates
Lack of Liquidity in a TIPS
portfolio
TIPS mimic the return of
Barclays Aggregate (AGG)
with higher volatility and
much larger drawdowns
Barclays US Treasury Inflation Notes vs. Barclays Aggregate March 2000-December 2013
Mar 2000 -Dec 2013 TIPS AGG
Annual Return 6.67% 5.68%
Annual Vol 6.42% 3.56%
IR 1.04 1.60
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,400,000.00
$1,600,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,200,000.00
$2,400,000.00
$2,600,000.00
$2,800,000.00
Date
7/31/2000
1/31/2001
7/31/2001
1/31/2002
7/31/2002
1/31/2003
7/31/2003
1/31/2004
7/31/2004
1/31/2005
7/31/2005
1/31/2006
7/31/2006
1/31/2007
7/31/2007
1/31/2008
7/31/2008
1/31/2009
7/31/2009
1/31/2010
7/31/2010
1/31/2011
7/31/2011
1/31/2012
7/31/2012
1/31/2013
7/31/2013
TIPS
AGG
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Federal Reserve
PAGE │ 9
In 1977, Congress amended The Federal Reserve Act to establish the current objective of
the Federal Reserve (“Fed”). This marked the beginning of the Fed’s “dual mandate” to
both keep inflation in line and to encourage economic growth at the same time.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal
Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary
and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run
potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of
maximum employment, stable prices and moderate interest rates.”
(Federal Reserve Act, Section 2A)
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Investment Cycle post WWII
Only country with a viable economy post WWII is the United States
This leads to a boom in US corporate Earnings as US rebuilds the world. Stock market rally of the 1950s
Eventually other countries recover and go from importing nations to exporting nations (Eg. Japan and Germany) 1960s
This puts pressure on commodities and demand for goods picks up, and corporate profits go lower (Late 1960s to early 1980s)
Eventually Bond yields go up to fight inflation putting more pressure on corporate profits (Late 1960s to early 1980s)
Once inflation is beaten, best time to invest in bonds (1980s)
Falling yields and falling inputs costs (commodities) lead to higher corporate profits (1990s)
These high corporate profits lead to global expansion and importing nations become exporting nations (BRIC) 2000s
Causing demand for commodities again as in the 1960s
PAGE │ 10
•Falling CPI
•Stock Market Rally
1945-1965
•Rising CPI
•Rising Commodity Prices
•Rising Bond Yields
•Flat Stock Prices
1965-1982•Falling CPI
•Falling Commodity Prices
•Falling Bond Yields
•Rising Stock Prices
1982-2000
•Rising CPI
•Rising Commodity Prices
•Falling Bond Yields
•Flat Stock Prices
2000-2012•Falling CPI
•Falling Commodity Prices
•Rising Bond Yields
•Rising Stocks
2013-Present
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
PAGE │ 11
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
06
/2
9/4
5
12
/3
1/4
5
06
/2
8/4
6
12
/3
1/4
6
06
/3
0/4
7
12
/3
1/4
7
06
/3
0/4
8
12
/3
1/4
8
06
/3
0/4
9
12
/3
0/4
9
06
/3
0/5
0
12
/2
9/5
0
06
/2
9/5
1
12
/3
1/5
1
06
/3
0/5
2
12
/3
1/5
2
06
/3
0/5
3
12
/3
1/5
3
06
/3
0/5
4
12
/3
1/5
4
06
/3
0/5
5
12
/3
0/5
5
06
/2
9/5
6
12
/3
1/5
6
06
/2
8/5
7
12
/3
1/5
7
06
/3
0/5
8
12
/3
1/5
8
06
/3
0/5
9
12
/3
1/5
9
06
/3
0/6
0
12
/3
0/6
0
06
/3
0/6
1
12
/2
9/6
1
06
/2
9/6
2
12
/3
1/6
2
06
/2
8/6
3
12
/3
1/6
3
06
/3
0/6
4
12
/3
1/6
4
SPX
CPI
SP
X in
$
CP
I in %
S&P 500 versus CPI
Asset Class Comparison from 1945 - 1965
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Asset Class Comparison from 1965 - 1985
PAGE │ 12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
SPX
CPI
SP
X in
$
CP
I in
S&P 500 versus CPI
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Gold
10 Year Yield
Gold versus 10 Year Note Yield
Go
ld in
$1
0 Y
ea
r No
te Y
ield
in %
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Asset Class Comparison from 1985 - 2000
PAGE │ 13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
16000
6/2
8/8
5
12
/3
1/8
5
06
/3
0/8
6
12
/3
1/8
6
06
/3
0/8
7
12
/3
1/8
7
06
/3
0/8
8
12
/3
0/8
8
06
/3
0/8
9
12
/2
9/8
9
06
/2
9/9
0
12
/3
1/9
0
06
/2
8/9
1
12
/3
1/9
1
06
/3
0/9
2
12
/3
1/9
2
06
/3
0/9
3
12
/3
1/9
3
06
/3
0/9
4
12
/3
0/9
4
06
/3
0/9
5
12
/2
9/9
5
06
/2
8/9
6
12
/3
1/9
6
06
/3
0/9
7
12
/3
1/9
7
06
/3
0/9
8
12
/3
1/9
8
06
/3
0/9
9
12
/3
1/9
9
SPX
CPI
SP
X in
$
S&P 500 versus CPI
CP
I in %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
06
/2
8/8
5
12
/3
1/8
5
06
/3
0/8
6
12
/3
1/8
6
06
/3
0/8
7
12
/3
1/8
7
06
/3
0/8
8
12
/3
0/8
8
06
/3
0/8
9
12
/2
9/8
9
06
/2
9/9
0
12
/3
1/9
0
06
/2
8/9
1
12
/3
1/9
1
06
/3
0/9
2
12
/3
1/9
2
06
/3
0/9
3
12
/3
1/9
3
06
/3
0/9
4
12
/3
0/9
4
06
/3
0/9
5
12
/2
9/9
5
06
/2
8/9
6
12
/3
1/9
6
06
/3
0/9
7
12
/3
1/9
7
06
/3
0/9
8
12
/3
1/9
8
06
/3
0/9
9
12
/3
1/9
9
Gold
10 Year Yield
Gold versus 10 Year Note Yield
Go
ld in
$1
0 Y
ea
r No
te Y
ield
in %
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Asset Class Comparison from 2000 - Present
PAGE │ 14
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
SPX
CPI
SP
X in
$C
PI in
%
S&P 500 versus CPI
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Gold
10 Year YieldGo
ld in
$1
0 Y
ea
r No
te Y
ield
in %
Gold versus 10 Year Note Yield
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Preserving Purchase Power Philosophy
A multi-asset tactical approach is the best solution to protect a portfolio against falling purchasing power
Investing in the correct beta at the right time is the best way to generate alpha
Sector and sub-sector betas should be achieved efficiently, and be low cost
During an investment cycle outperforming during down moves is more important than outperforming up moves
A portfolio should have a positive cost of carry
An investment strategy should be low cost, liquid, and transparent
PAGE │ 15
CONFIDENTIAL. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Biography
Joshua Silva
Managing Director,
Chief Portfolio Strategist
18+ years of risk management and
execution experience in the US and
European markets trading derivatives
Senior Portfolio Strategist and Portfolio Manager at Attalus Capital, in charge of creating new investment
approaches and providing customized beta and alpha solutions for the firm’s clients
Managing Director of Equity Derivatives Trading at Credit Suisse in New York.
Responsible for overseeing the US single stock option flow derivatives trading team and managing its risk
Options trader at CME for Société Générale
B.S in Chemical
Engineering from the
University of Wisconsin
in Madison
M.S. in Financial
Mathematics from the
University of Chicago
Earl Kleckner
Managing Director,
Business Development
31 years of experience in sales,
business development and client service
Managing Director of Sales at Attalus Capital, a boutique asset management firm, overseeing the firm’s
business development and client services
Managing Director of Client Services and Reporting at Mellon Capital Management
Vice President of Utility Trust Products for Mellon Trust
B.S. in Business
Administration from
California University
MBA also from
California University
PAGE │ 16