hazard identification and resolution - nssga · 2016-10-12 · 30 cfr §56/57.18002 examination of...

© 2013 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved © 2013 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION

HOW TO CHANGE THE

CONSULTANT PHOTO/NAME

Right Click on photo and

select Change Picture…

Next find your photo/name and

Click Insert

If you can’t find your photo give

Brad C. a call.

The placed picture should be

width 1.75” x height 2.5”

© 2013 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved

30 CFR §56/57.18002 Examination of working places

(a) A competent person designated by the operator shall examine each working place at least once each shift for conditions which may adversely affect safety or health. The operator shall promptly initiate appropriate action to correct such conditions.

(b) A record that such examinations were conducted shall be kept by the operator for a period of one year, and shall be made available for review by the Secretary or his authorized representative.

(c) In addition, conditions that may present an imminent danger which are noted by the person conducting the examination shall be brought to the immediate attention of the operator who shall withdraw all persons from the area affected (except persons referred to in section 104(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977) until the danger is abated.

MSHA Policy


Barriers to Effective Hazard Identification and Resolution

No magic solutions

Safety is a slogan, not a value.

“Not my issue, talk to the safety person.”

Communication and Motivation

Ineffective programs:

- Lacking Top Down Support for Safety

- Lacking Supervisor Accountability

- Ineffective training for supervisors/miners

- Check in the box to meet MSHA requirements

Tradition:

- Always done it this way

- Conditions are the problem


Condition or At-Risk Behavior?

Injuries Related to

Equipment Guarding

Climbing on guard

5%

Handling/Dropped

oversized and

heavy guards

45%

Reached past

or around guard

14%

Removed guard

during operation

10%

Inadequate guard

size / position

14% Inherently

hazardous guard

12%


Why Incidents Occur: Conditions or Behaviors?

Risky Behaviors

90%

AT-RISK

BEHAVIOR INCIDENT

What percentage of

incidents occur based on

conditions vs. behaviors?


Why Do Incidents Occur?

CULTURE

NORMS ATTITUDES

BELIEFS

IDEAS

AT-RISK

BEHAVIOR INCIDENT

Root Causes

SCEW

SCEW-Lite

LRT

STT

CIT


Why Start with Culture

CULTURE

NORMS ATTITUDES

BELIEFS

IDEAS

SAFE WORK ZERO

INJURY

Root Causes

SCEW

SCEW-Lite

LRT

STT

CIT


# Question Industry Average Global Average

11 Is high hazard equipment inspected more thoroughly than other

equipment?50.3 63.9

14 Are records kept of potential hazards found during inspections? 81.3 83.0

18 Are unscheduled inspections of operations made? 63.6 60.9

53 Are checks made to be sure required protective equipment is being used? 80.9 84.0

57 Do employees participate in inspections for potential hazards? 72.9 78.3

66 Are employees checked on a routine basis to see whether they are doing

their jobs safely? 64.8 70.3

Score

Inspections


Hazard Correction

# Question Industry Average Global Average

14 Are records kept of potential hazards found during inspections? 81.3 83.0

27 Do employees participate in the development of safe work practices? 77.4 81.9

37 Do you think your organization seeks prompt correction of problems found

during inspections?75.5 78.3

42 Do you initiate action to correct hazards? 92.6 93.3

52 Do you have problems obtaining support for the correction of hazardous

conditions?68.7 71.9

68 Does the safety committee have the ability to correct unsafe conditions? 87.6 87.0

Score


Six Criteria + Accountability = Excellence

Top management is visibly

committed

Middle management is actively

involved

Front-line supervision is

performance-focused

Employees are actively participating

System is flexible to accommodate

the culture

Safety system is positively

perceived by the workforce


Typical Traditional Accountability

Desired Mine Foreman Activity: Conduct workplace examination at

least once each shift

Senior Leader: Gets monthly report of departments that did NOT conduct their

workplace examination.

(ASKS: Did we have any accidents/MSHA citations?)

Mid-Manager: Did you conduct your workplace examination?

(or checks for anyone who didn’t conduct it)

NOTE: Often there are many more levels than this.


Accountability that Works!

Desired Mine Foreman Activity: Connect with/engage your employees in the ongoing

examination of the workplace for unsafe conditions/at-risk behaviors

Senior Leader: At management meeting asks two managers to talk about what they’ve

done to improve the quality of the workplace examinations

ASKS: What has been the result from having greater miner participation?

Which two foreman conduct the highest quality workplace examinations?

Who are you working with on improving the quality of their examinations?

Mid-Manager: Participates in one workplace examination/month and recognizes

(coaches) foreman afterwards

ASKS: What issues have you identified?

What miner’s have been the most proactive in identifying hazards?

NOTE: Often there are many more levels than this.


Example: Hazard Correction and Resolution

RED Stop immediately!

Report unsafe condition or act that can result in

death, serious personal injury,

property damage or loss.

YELLOW Use caution.

Report unsafe condition or act that can result

moderate personal injury,

property damage or loss.

GREEN Continue and report unsafe

condition or act that has low

risk of personal injury, damage

or loss.


The Process


HAZARD IDENTIFICATION and CORRECTION REPORT CHECK APPROPRIATE LEVEL

STOP WORK AND REPORT USE CAUTION AND REPORT CONTINUE & REPORT

LOCATION: TIME: DATE:

DEPT.: CITY / STATE:

GROUND SURFACE AND WEATHER CONDITION (IF APPLICABLE):

REPORTED BY (OPTIONAL):

SUPERVISOR REVIEW: DATE:

DESCRIBE NEAR MISS ON REVERSE SIDE

DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:

ACTIONS TAKEN:

ROOT CAUSE(S) - REQUIRED FOR RED

WERE PICTURES TAKEN YES: NO:

RED YELLOW GREEN


Involve all levels of the organization

− Who’s closest to the hazards?

Look at behaviors and conditions – determine root causes

Measure quality and quantity

Recognize performance

Ensure an on-going process

− Measure the presence of safety, not just the absence of citations

Wrap

CAT, CATERPILLAR, ZIP, their respective logos, “Caterpillar Yellow” and the POWER EDGE

trade dress, as well as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar

and may not be used without permission. © 2013 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved

THANK YOU

FOR LISTENING

ZACH KNOOP

309.675.9616

[email protected]

hazard identification and resolution - nssga · 2016-10-12 · 30 cfr §56/57.18002 examination of...

Documents