hazardous materials survey report...project no.1048310001.33101 hazardous materials survey report...

WATER | ENERGY & RESOURCES | ENVIRONMENT | PROPERTY & BUILDINGS | TRANSPORTATION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORTPier 70 Renovation Project

Crane 30, Crane 14, & Street Tower San Francisco, California

Prepared For:Ms. Carol Bach

Port of San FranciscoPier 1 The Embarcadero

San Francisco California 94111

January 28, 2013

GHD Inc.

417 Montgomery Street Suite 700 San Francisco CA 94104

(415) 283 4970

Project No.1048310001.33101 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Pier 70 Renovation Project Crane 30, Crane 14, & Street Tower 1

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 1.1. Structure Description ....................................................................................................2 2. METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................2 2.1. General - Survey Methodology .........................................................................................2 2.2. Asbestos - Survey Methodology .......................................................................................3 2.2.1. Asbestos Analytical Methodology ..................................................................................3 2.3. Lead Testing – Survey and Analytical Methodology ..........................................................4 2.4. Universal Wastes & Other Suspected Hazardous Materials ...............................................4 3. RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................4 3.1. Asbestos Survey ...............................................................................................................4 3.2. Lead Testing .....................................................................................................................6 3.2.1. General Interpretation of Lead-Containing Paint Findings Reported ...............................6 3.2.2. Paint Condition Findings................................................................................................7 3.3. Universal Wastes & Other Potential Hazardous Materials .................................................7 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................7 4.1. Asbestos Survey ...............................................................................................................7 4.2. Lead Testing .....................................................................................................................8 4.3. Universal Wastes & Presumed Hazardous Materials ..........................................................9 5. CLOSING ......................................................................................................................... 10 6. SIGNATURES AND QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 11 TABLE 1 SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL TABLE 2 IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE 3 LEAD TEST RESULTS APPENDIX A - ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DATA (Asbestos & Lead)


1. INTRODUCTION GHD Inc. (GHD), formerly Winzler & Kelly, performed a pre-renovation hazardous materials survey at Pier 70, Crane 30, Crane 14, and the Steel Tower in San Francisco, California for the Port of San Francisco. The purpose of this survey was to test for asbestos, lead, and other potentially hazardous materials present in support of the upcoming renovation project. GHD’s on-site hazardous materials survey was conducted on July 18, 2011 and the survey team included Mr. Christopher Smith and Mr. Lionel “Butch” Reynolds. Mr. Reynolds is a Certified Industrial Hygienist, Certified Asbestos Consultant, and CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor and Project Designer and performed quality assurance for the survey to ensure Port of San Francisco received high quality services. The project was planned and overseen by Chris Smith, a Certified Asbestos Consultant and CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor. This report summarizes the survey findings. Below is a list of our Hazardous Materials Project team and certification information:

Team Member DOSH Asbestos Cert # CDPH Lead Cert # CIH #

Erica Sattar CSST # 08-4327 Lead Sampling Technician # 20425 NA

Butch Reynolds CAC # 92-0435

Project Monitor/Inspector Assessor and Designer # 225 # 3188

Chris Smith CAC # 05-3823 Project Monitor/Inspector Assessor # 12430 NA

1.1. Structure Description

Crane 30 and Crane 14 are steel structures with a one room cab area in each Crane. Windows at each crane cab area contain window glazing compound and sheet flooring at Crane 14 interior cab area. The Steel Tower is a stand-alone steel structure with no other materials found on the structure. 2. METHODOLOGY

2.1. General - Survey Methodology GHD’s survey was conducted according to the approach described in our proposal and this report. The survey included sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) identified during a visual survey of the structure, a screening survey of representative painted surfaces and coatings for lead-based paint (LBP), and a visual inspection for other possible hazardous materials. Specific survey procedures are provided in the following paragraphs.

All laboratory reports for asbestos and lead analysis are included in Attachment A.


2.2. Asbestos - Survey Methodology Identification of suspect or presumed present asbestos-containing material (ACM) was performed by visually surveying structural, architectural, and mechanical components and finishes on the structure interior and exterior. No excavation was conducted to discover buried insulated piping and/or asbestos cement pipes concealed below the surface. Materials concealed in walls and ceiling spaces, not accessible without severely damaging finishes were not sampled as the scope of work has yet to be determined and historical materials must be preserved without further scope clarification.

All findings, conclusions, and analytical data presented in this report are based on our visual inspection of accessible areas, and the results of the sampling and analysis of accessible suspected ACM discovered during the survey. Existing laboratory data was not provided for this structure.

Suspect ACM identified during this survey was bulk sampled using sampling guidelines established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and by generally following the methods described in Appendix K of title 8, CCR, Section 1529 of the California Code of Regulations for sample collection. The following summarizes the sampling procedures utilized.

Visually identified suspect ACMs were categorized into homogeneous material areas. A homogeneous material is defined as being a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material which is uniform in color and texture.

A sampling scheme was developed based upon the location and quantity of the various homogeneous materials.

Trained and certified personnel using appropriate sampling tools and leak-tight containers collected bulk samples.

Bulk sample collection tools were decontaminated after the collection of each bulk sample to prevent the spread of secondary contamination to subsequent bulk samples.

Each bulk sample was labeled with a unique sample identification number and recorded on a bulk sample log.

Bulk samples collected were submitted to a laboratory with a chain of custody record. All material quantities reported herein are rough order of magnitude estimates and should not be used for bidding purposes without review of available record drawings and on-site field verification by the bidder. The information provided in this report should be used in conjunction with construction documents and the contractor’s own field verification of the abatement scope of work including location and extent of removal required for the renovation project being undertaken at Structure 30, 14, and the Steel Tower. In the event that concealed suspect ACM materials not previously identified are discovered, the contractor is obligated to stop and notify the owner immediately in compliance with applicable regulations.

2.2.1. Asbestos Analytical Methodology Bulk samples of suspect ACM were sent to Forensic Analytical in Hayward, California. Forensic Analytical is laboratory accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (Cal-ELAP) for bulk asbestos sample analysis. The samples were submitted for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing dispersion staining techniques in accordance with the EPA’s “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116, dated July 1993 and adopted by the NVLAP as Test


Method Code 18/A01.

Standard PLM analytical method has a limit of quantification of 1% asbestos. For materials with asbestos detected at trace levels or below 1% by standard PLM, the material must be considered to be above 1% (ACM) unless re-analyzed and found to be less than 1% by the PLM point count method (400 points minimum). Each sample of a homogeneous area material (typically for friable materials) with trace result(s) must be re-analyzed by point count and found to be less than 1% in order to avoid assuming the material to be ACM according to EPA regulation. Based on the PLM results for these structures, no point count analysis was required.

2.3. Lead Testing – Survey and Analytical Methodology LBP is defined as any painted surface with lead levels exceeding 5,000 parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm²) or greater than 0.5 percent by weight (wt%), as set forth in the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines and California Department of Public Health (CDPH) regulations. Lead-Containing Paints (LCPs) are paints and coatings that contain detectable lead as defined by Cal/OSHA. Most paints and coatings on pre-1978 buildings/structures contain some detectable lead subject to Cal/OSHA regulation. Therefore the exhaustive testing required to prove painted coatings do not contain lead is not practical or cost effective. Consequently, all paints and architectural coatings must be considered to contain some detectable levels of lead unless proven otherwise by laboratory analysis.

This survey included screening level LBP testing and paint chip sampling for the purpose of characterizing the general presence of lead in existing paints and coatings. As such, this survey included paint testing using a Niton XLp 300A XRF direct read lead testing instrument. The results presented herein are representative of typical conditions but are not inclusive of all painted/coated surfaces present at this structure. A limited number of paint chip samples were collected to supplement the XRF test results. The results of this survey should assist with compliance to the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) lead construction standard and preliminary evaluation of potential construction waste streams. All painted/coated surfaces including untested surfaces, must be assumed to contain some detectable level of lead in the absence of representative paint chip analytical results demonstrating that lead levels are below analytical detection limits. This is because the XRF instrument, while providing a cost effective, non-destructive test method, the instrument is calibrated to detect LBP and cannot detect lead at the lowest levels regulated by Cal/OSHA and Cal/EPA.

2.4. Universal Wastes & Other Suspected Hazardous Materials Structures 30, 14, and the Steel Tower were visually surveyed for other hazardous materials. These suspect hazardous materials included fluorescent lighting fixtures manufactured prior to 1979 that have the potential to contain Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) ballasts, mercury containing lighting tubes, and other components considered to be “universal wastes” upon disposal. “Universal wastes” include mercury-containing non-incandescent lamps, batteries and other hazardous wastes commonly found in building/structure components and equipment. 3. RESULTS

3.1. Asbestos Survey GHD collected 20 bulk samples of suspect ACM. All suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs)


sampled during this survey are listed in Table 1 – Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials. The laboratory analytical results for sampled suspect ACMs can be found in Attachment A – Analytical Laboratory Reports at the end of this report.

Materials containing asbestos: Crane 30

Electrical breaker insulator (10% asbestos), dark gray

Electrical insulator (5% asbestos), black

Brake shoe (25% asbestos)

Window glazing compound (trace asbestos, assumed > 1% asbestos), gray

Crane 14

Electrical insulator (15% asbestos), gray

Electrical insulator debris (7% asbestos)

Brake pad (25% asbestos), gray

Window glazing compound (trace asbestos, assumed > 1% asbestos), gray

Street Tower

No suspect asbestos containing materials detected on this structure.

Materials sampled with no asbestos reported: Crane 30

All materials sampled at Crane 30 were reported to contain asbestos. Refer to laboratory data attached.

Crane 14

Exterior paint, gray with red paint beneath and silver/pink paint

Sheet flooring, multiply layers in some areas

Fabric door liner

Fabric/coated wire insulation

Window caulk/glazing compound, black with a rubber texture

Street Tower

Exterior paint

Please refer to Table 1 for a full list of all materials sampled at Crane 30 and Crane 14, including those with no asbestos detected. All laboratory data can be located in Attachment A of this report.

Refer to Table 2 for a complete list of identified asbestos containing and hazardous materials including estimated material quantities.


3.2. Lead Testing GHD performed a total of 44 XRF lead tests. Ten (10) XRF tests, four (4) paint chip samples, and one (1) window glazing compound were performed at Crane 30; 28 XRF tests, (4) paint chip samples, and one (1) window glazing compound were performed at Crane 14; and six (6) XRF tests were performed at the Street Tower. The results of the XRF LBP screening survey are provided in Table 3 – Lead Test Results. A total of 20 XRF tests and five (5) paint chip samples, approximately 50% of the representative painted surfaces tested, contained lead at LBP levels above the threshold 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5 wt%. Of the 50% of painted surfaces with level at or above LBP levels all except one (1) sample was tested at Crane 14.

The following is a brief summary of structure components that tested positive for lead based paint (LBP) by XRF and laboratory testing:

Crane 30

Paint at the gusset plate on the steel traveler, red/pink, 5.5 wt% by laboratory analysis

Crane 14

Metal beam, gray, 3 – 9.6 mg/cm2

Metal handrail, gray, 3.8 mg/cm2

Metal ladder, gray, 1.4 - 1.6 mg/cm2

Metal house wall, gray, 4.5 – 7.05 mg/cm2

Metal house beam, gray, 6 – 6.75 mg/cm2

Cab Interior, dark green/red, 10 wt% by laboratory analysis

Steel rotation table, silver/red, 14 wt% by laboratory analysis

Structural steel paint, 0.76 wt% by laboratory analysis

Street Tower

Structural steel, gray, 0.37 – 0.6 mg/cm2

Refer to Table 3 – Lead Test Results for a complete listing of results for the suspect lead-based paint testing and refer to Attachment A for all laboratory results including paint chip results summarized above. Note: The above listing and Table 3 are not intended to be all inclusive and must be extrapolated to similar surfaces that were not tested. Colors are provided to assist in identification of specific surfaces tested but may not be a reliable indicator of lead content alone due to varied painting histories involved. Generally on a structure by structure basis, component type and substrate are more reliable indicators.

3.2.1. General Interpretation of Lead-Containing Paint Findings Reported All painted components must be presumed to contain some detectable levels of lead regardless of non – detection by the XRF method unless exhaustively tested by paint chip analysis. Untested painted/coated components must be presumed to contain some lead at detectable levels. About 70% of the painted surfaces tested at Crane 14 contained levels of lead considered to be LBP and only 5% of the painted surfaces tested at Crane 30 contained levels of lead considered to be LBP


and most of the remaining surfaces contained some detectable lead.

3.2.2. Paint Condition Findings

The condition of paint at this site is generally in fair/poor condition. Since even low levels of paint (e.g. just over 50 ppm) may exhibit hazardous waste characteristics, care must be taken to eliminate loose and peeling paint prior to general construction operations that may disturb it.. While very minimum for this project, any loose, peeling or flaking paint encountered should be removed and disposed of as lead hazardous waste.

3.3. Universal Wastes & Other Potential Hazardous Materials

GHD visually inspected readily accessible areas of Crane 30, Crane 14, and the Street Tower for other hazardous materials, Universal Wastes (such as mercury containing lighting tubes, thermostats, and batteries), and other suspect hazardous waste and contamination. No attempt to disassemble equipment or sample any additionally discovered suspect materials was included. Any suspect hazardous material must be presumed hazardous pending complete identification. For example, fluorescent lighting fixtures must be presumed to contain PCB ballasts pending removal and disassembly of each unit to determine ballast type and/or labeling in the absence of other explicit product specific information to the contrary. The following is a summary of our findings:

Non-incandescent exterior lights (mercury), approximately one (1). 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1. Asbestos Survey Prior to renovation and/or demolition construction activities, known or assumed ACMs that are likely to be disturbed by those activities, must be removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable regulations including federal National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) and Cal/OSHA regulations. A Cal-OSHA registered and State licensed, registered asbestos contractor (abatement/demolition/roofing) is required for removal of ACM prior to general demolition and renovation.

At minimum, the contractor’s abatement sub-contractor should remove all friable RACM under class I removal requirements and dispose of waste as hazardous asbestos waste at a landfill permitted for asbestos hazardous waste disposal. The contractor’s abatement sub-contractor should also remove all category I & II non-friable ACM in a manner that does not produce friable ACM under Cal/OSHA Class II removal requirements and dispose of removed materials as non-hazardous asbestos waste at a landfill permitted for asbestos waste disposal.

The following additional requirements should be adhered to for any maintenance, renovation, or demolition projects requiring asbestos disturbance and/or removal:

All asbestos-containing wastes shall be manifested as either hazardous or non-hazardous based on asbestos content, friability, and actual waste stream classification.

All asbestos removal should be overseen by a qualified independent third party retained by the structure owner or manager of the structure to ensure proper removal, clean up, work area clearance, and review waste shipping and disposal documentation.


Contractor should perform all work in compliance with contract documents and the most recent edition of all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations, standards, and codes governing abatement, transport, and disposal of asbestos.

4.2. Lead Testing The painted components tested at Crane 30, Crane 14, and the Street Tower structures, typically had low detectable levels of lead that should be considered LBP coated. LBP was detected at Crane 14, metal and structural steel components. All paints and coatings should be considered LCP or coatings in the absence of exhaustive sampling and laboratory analysis. The disturbance of these components during demolition and renovation activities will require use of personnel trained in lead hazards for construction and will require compliance with applicable Cal/OSHA and Cal/EPA regulation.

At present there is no state or federal regulation requiring mandatory lead removal or abatement prior to disturbance, demolition or renovation of structures with identified lead materials. However, prior to hot work on painted metal, the paint either needs to be removed or supplied air respirators worn during welding or cutting operation. In addition, there are applicable lead specific Cal/OSHA worker protection requirements and Cal/EPA waste disposal requirements that do apply to lead-related construction activities and associated wastes:

Cal/OSHA: The Cal/OSHA regulation, Title 8, CCR, Section 1532.1 Lead governs occupational exposure to lead. This regulation requires that any task that may potentially expose workers to any concentration of lead, be monitored to determine workers eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) exposure to lead. Prior to initiation of certain activities, referred to as “trigger tasks”, that are believed to have the capability of creating an excessive lead exposure, such workers must be properly fitted with respiratory protection and protective clothing until personal eight-hour TWA results reveal exposures within acceptable levels. Pertinent examples of trigger tasks are manual demolition, manual paint scraping and power tool removal, and hot work involving lead-containing coatings or materials. Cal/OSHA also has agency pre-start notification requirements and worker training and certification depending on exposure levels. Clearly these requirements will apply to selective demolition, patch and repair, paint removal, and surface preparation work at this structure.

Cal/EPA: Cal/EPA regulates disposal of lead hazardous waste (22 CCR Division 4.5, Environmental Health Standards for the Management of Hazardous Waste). The Cal/EPA Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) has issued guidance indicating that architectural debris with intact lead paint is normally anticipated to be handled as general construction waste. Since detected LCP was in fair/poor condition and lead based paint coatings tested had low lead content, it is unlikely that demolition debris will be hazardous as a composite sample. However, all paint containing waste streams should be considered potentially lead hazardous pending waste testing. Further, all surface preparation and paint removal wastes must be considered hazardous wastes due to the likelihood of paint chip lead levels exceeding 1,000 total lead or 5 ppm soluble lead.

San Francisco Lead Ordinance: San Francisco Building code, Chapter 26: Sections 3602-3606: This ordinance applies to buildings constructed before 1979 and contains notification, containment standards, prohibitions and other performance standards for work that disturbs exterior lead-based paint.

CDPH: The State of California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has specific requirements (Title 17 Sections 35001 thru 36100 et. al.) for hazard assessment and work in public or residential


structures. These regulations require special certifications, work practices, and notification for such activities. While lead-related abatement work is not anticipated, lead-related construction (demolition, cut and patch, painting, etc.) will require work practice and containment controls to prevent contamination of the building and exposure of residents.

Senate Bill 460 (SB 460): An act to amend Section 1941.1 of the Civil Code, and to amend Sections 17961, 17980, and 124130 of, and to add Sections 17920.10, 105251, 105252, 105253, 105254, 105255, 105256, and 105257 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to lead abatement. This bill allows for fines and criminal penalties to be levied on any person who is found to have performed lead abatement without containment or created a measurable lead hazard based upon current CDPH standards. The testing for this determination can be initiated by any local or state building inspector, health department inspector, or other designated state or local official. A determination of a lead hazard is not solely based upon the lead content of the paint or coating and can be the result of the disturbance of such materials with low concentrations of lead.

All construction activities impacting LCP must be performed in compliance with the most recent edition of all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations, standards, and codes governing abatement, transport, and disposal of lead containing/contaminated materials. Selective and general demolition activities will involve disturbing lead and possibly creating lead hazardous wastes. These construction activities must be controlled to prevent uncontrolled release of lead contamination and for environmental protection.

The Contractor conducting structure renovation and selective demolition controls the means and methods used and therefore should be required by the contract document to ensure that the renovation and demolition processes are conducted in a manner that creates the minimum amount of hazardous waste and leaves the site free of lead contamination exceeding regulatory levels.

Written notification to Cal/OSHA must be accomplished should LBP activities involve more than 100 square or linear feet of removal in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR 1532.1. Proper written notification to CDPH may be required, depending upon the nature of the activity. For this facility and project, the Contractor should anticipate a minimum of 70% of the painted surfaces at Crane 14 and 5% of the painted surfaces at Crane 30 to contain LBP for notification purposes.

Proper waste characterization and disposal of lead-containing materials and lead-contaminated debris is the should be the responsibility of the Contractor and shall be conducted in accordance with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and the California Health and Safety Code, Section 25157.8. It is the Contractor’s responsibly to confirm the hazardous material location and quantities present prior to initiating renovation or demolition activities at the subject structure. Should materials similar to those identified in this report, or other forms of suspect hazardous materials be discovered during construction, the Contractors should immediately cease work activities which may initiate an asbestos fiber release episode or hazardous material contamination of the site, and notify the appropriate construction management personnel.

4.3. Universal Wastes & Presumed Hazardous Materials Universal Wastes: All potential and identified mercury-containing exterior non-incandescent lights should be removed and recycled or disposed of in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control Universal Waste Rule, as


stated in 22 CCR Sections 66261.9 and 66273.1 thru 66273.90.

5. CLOSING GHD performed the hazardous materials survey services in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. Conclusions and recommendations made regarding hazardous materials were based upon information obtained from samples and tests collected at specific locations, review of information provided to us, and professional judgment. Recommendations in this report were made based on conditions that we reasonably infer to exist between sampling points. This report is intended as an informational resource for the Port of San Francisco. Any contractor using this document assumes all responsibility for reviewing all available information and for verifying existing site conditions including location and extent of hazardous materials present at Crane 30, Crane 14, and Street Tower structures.

Should any significant discrepancy between this report and existing conditions be discovered, the contractor shall notify the project manager, contracting officer, or inspector immediately. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this document please do not hesitate to call GHD at (415) 283-4970.


6. SIGNATURES AND QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Report prepared for Port of San Francisco by: Erica Sattar Industrial Hygiene & Hazardous Material Specialist Certified Site Surveillance Technician #08-4327 CDPH #20425 Report prepared and reviewed for Port of San Francisco by: Butch Reynolds, CIH Project Manager Certified Asbestos Consultant #92-0435 CDPH Lead Inspector-Assessor/Project Designer #225

TABLE 1

SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

TABLE 1SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

BLDG # SAMPLE ID SUSPECT MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL

MATERIALS/LAYERS SAMPLE LOCATION RESULTS

30 30-Z1-1 INSULATOR GRAY BACKINGNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 30, GROUND LEVEL ELECTRICAL PANEL ND

30 30-Z2-2ELECTRICAL BREAKER INSULATOR DARK GRAY

NO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 30, ELECTRICAL PANEL BREAKERS 10%

30 30-Z3-3 ELECTRICAL INSULATOR BLACKNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 30, INTERIOR 5%

30 30-Z4-4 BRAKE SHOE TANNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 30, INTERIOR 25%

30 30-Z5-5 INSULATOR WHITENO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 30, INTERIOR ND

30 30-O1-6WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND WHITE


CRANE 30, CAB WINDOWS *TRACE

30 30-O1-7WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND WHITE


CRANE 30, CAB WINDOWS ND

14 14-Z5-8 ELECTRICAL INSULATOR GRAY CEMENTNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS CRANE 14 15%

14 14-O2-9WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND GRAY PAINT

CRANE 14, CAB INTERIOR

GLAZING COMPOUND =

*TRACEPAINT = ND


CRANE 14, CAB INTERIOR ND


CRANE 14, CAB WINDOW ND

14 14-P1-12 EXTERIOR PAINT GRAY/REDNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS

CRANE 14, STRUCTURAL STEEL ND

1048310001 - 33101Pier 70 Renovation ProjectCrane 30, Crane 14, Street Tower 1

TABLE 1SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

BLDG # SAMPLE ID SUSPECT MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL

MATERIALS/LAYERS SAMPLE LOCATION RESULTS

14 14-Z6-13 BRAKE PAD GRAYNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS CRANE 14 25%

14 14-H1-14 SHEET FLOORING RED BACKINGCRANE 14, CRANE CAB ND

14 14-H1/2-15 SHEET FLOORING RED MULTIPLE LAYERSCRANE 14, CRANE CAB ND

14 14-AA-16 FABRIC DOOR LINER TAN PAINTCRANE 14, CRANE CAB ND

14 14-BB-17FABRIC/COATED WIRE INSULATOR TAN PAINT

CRANE 14, CRANE INTERIOR ELECTRICAL PANEL ND

14 14-Z6-18ELECTRICAL INSULATOR (DEBRIS) GRAY BLACK COATING

CRANE 14, CAB INTERIOR

GRAY MATERIAL = 7%

BLACK COATING = ND

14 14-N1-19WINDOW CAULK/GLAZING COMPOUND

BLACK (RUBBER TEXTURE)

NO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS CRANE 14 ND

30 30-P-20 EXTERIOR PAINT SILVER/PINKNO ASSOCIATED MATERIALS CRANE 30 ND

NOTE:1. All asbestos reported as chrysotile unless otherwise noted.2. *Materials sampled with 'trace' amounts of asbestos detected are assumed to be greater than 1% asbestos.


TABLE 2

IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

TABLE 2IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

BLDG# MATERIAL HAZARD COMMENTS EPA CATEGORY

30ELECTRICAL BREAKER INSULATOR ASBESTOS INTERIOR DARK GRAY AND BLACK CATEGORY II - NON FRIABLE

30 BRAKE SHOE ASBESTOS INTERIOR, TAN CATEGORY II - NON FRIABLE

30/14WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND ASBESTOS INTERIOR CAB, GRAY CATEGORY II - NON FRIABLE

14 ELECTRICAL INSULATOR ASBESTOS INTERIOR, GRAY CEMENT CATEGORY II - NON FRIABLE14 BRAKE PAD ASBESTOS INTERIOR, GRAY CATEGORY II - NON FRIABLE

14ELECTRICAL INSULATOR (DEBRIS) ASBESTOS INTERIOR, GRAY RACM

14 PAINT LEAD LOOSE PAINT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL NA30 PAINT LEAD LOOSE PAINT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL NA

NOTES: 1. These quantities are approximate and provided for reference only. Contractor to field verify location and extent.2. All asbestos reported as chrysotile unless noted otherwise.3. N/A = not applicable.


TABLE 3

LEAD TEST RESULTS

TABLE 3LEAD TEST RESULTS

BLDG # TEST NO. COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLORRESULTmg/cm2

- 1 10.25- 2 1.05- 3 1.1- 4 1.1- 5 0.9- 6 1.1

30 7 PLATE TRAVEL METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1330 8 PLATE GUSSET METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1130 9 PLATE GUSSET METAL FAIR GRAY 0.0630 10 PLATE GUSSET METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1530 11 PLATE GUSSET METAL FAIR GRAY 0.0830 12 HAND RAIL METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1430 13 COLUMN METAL FAIR GRAY 0.0630 14 COLUMN METAL FAIR GRAY 0.0530 15 HOUSE METAL FAIR GRAY 0.0630 16 HOUSE METAL FAIR GRAY 0.9530 17 HOUSE METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1730 18 CONTROL METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1830 19 HOUSE WALL METAL FAIR GRAY 0.2730 20 HOUSE WALL METAL FAIR GRAY 0.1230 21 HOUSE MOTOR METAL FAIR GRAY 0.2330 22 HOUSE MOTOR METAL FAIR GRAY 0.2814 23 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 7.214 24 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 10.914 25 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 10.0514 26 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 3.114 27 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 8.2514 28 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 15.914 29 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 4.614 30 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 7.9514 31 HANDRAIL METAL POOR GRAY 3.814 32 LADDER METAL POOR GRAY 1.6

SHUTTER CALIBRATIONtest calibrationtest calibrationtest calibrationtest calibrationtest calibration




14 33 LADDER METAL POOR GRAY 1.414 34 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 6.414 35 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 4.514 36 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 314 37 TOE BOARD WOOD POOR GRAY 0.4314 38 TOE BOARD WOOD POOR GRAY 0.914 39 TOE BOARD WOOD POOR GRAY 0.614 40 BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 9.614 41 HOUSE WALL METAL POOR GRAY 7.0514 42 HOUSE WALL METAL POOR GRAY 6.914 43 HOUSE WALL METAL POOR GRAY 4.514 44 HOUSE BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 6.7514 45 HOUSE BEAM METAL POOR GRAY 6

STEEL TOWER 46 TOWER STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR GRAY 0.37STEEL TOWER 47 TOWER STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR GRAY 0.6STEEL TOWER 48 TOWER STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR GRAY 0.46STEEL TOWER 49 TOWER STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR GRAY 0.43STEEL TOWER 50 TOWER STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR GRAY 0.52

- 51 0.9- 52 1.1- 53 1.1

30 30-Z1-1 WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND FAIR GRAY 390 mg/kg30 30-P-7 PAINT at PLATE METAL FAIR SILVER/PINK 0.096 wt%30 30-P-8 PAINT at GUSSET PLATE STEEL TRAVELER FAIR RED/PINK 5.5 wt%30 30-P-18 PAINT at ELECTRICAL PANEL STEEL FAIR GREEN/PINK 0.23 wt%30 30-P-2 PAINT at SHEET METAL SHEET METAL FAIR GREEN/PINK 0.044 wt%

14 14-P-3 PAINT at CAB INTERIOR POORDARK GREEN/RED 10 wt%

14 14-P-24 PAINT below ROTATION TABLE STEEL POOR SILVER/RED 14 wt%14 14-P-35 PAINT STEEL POOR SILVER/RED 4.3 wt%

test calibrationtest calibrationtest calibration




14 14-Z1-4 WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND POOR GRAY 220 mg/kg14 T-P-5 PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL POOR 0.76 wt%

NOTES:mg/cm2 = milligrams per square centimeterwt% = percent by weightmg/kg = milligrams per kilogramXRF = X-ray fluorescence spectrum analyzerred highlight = denotes components tested with lead levels exceeding 5,000 ppm or mg/kg, 1.0 mg/cm² or greater than 0.5 wt%


APPENDIX A

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DATA (Asbestos & Lead)

Final Report

Bulk Asbestos Analysis(EPA Method 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation)

A31524Client ID:Winzler & KellyB151939Report Number:Butch Reynolds

Date Received:3410 Industrial Blvd., Ste 10207/20/11Date Analyzed:07/20/11Date Printed:West Sacramento, CA 95691

First Reported:

A31524-17210483-10-001 - Port of San Francisco - Pier 70: Building # Crane Park - Crane#30 - Crane 14, and Street Tower

FALI Job ID:Job ID/Site:

Date(s) Collected: 07/18/201120Total Samples Submitted:

Total Samples Analyzed: 20

07/19/11

Forensic Analytical Laboratories

07/20/11

Sample ID Lab NumberAsbestos

TypePercent in

LayerAsbestos AsbestosPercent in Percent in

Type TypeLayer Layer

30-Z1-1 11143444Layer: Grey Fibrous Material ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (95 %)

30-Z2-2 11143445Layer: Grey Semi-Fibrous Material Chrysotile 10 %

Asbestos (10%)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)

30-Z3-3 11143446Layer: Dark Grey Semi-Fibrous Material Chrysotile 5 %


30-Z4-4 11143447Layer: Tan Fibrous Material Chrysotile 25 %

Asbestos (25%)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (60 %)

30-Z5-5 11143448Layer: Tan Non-Fibrous Material ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)

30-O1-6 11143449Layer: White Non-Fibrous Material Chrysotile Trace

Asbestos (Trace)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)

30-O1-7 11143450Layer: White Non-Fibrous Material ND


14-Z5-8 11143451Layer: Grey Semi-Fibrous Material Chrysotile 15 %


1 of 33777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218

Report Number: B151939Date Printed: 07/20/11Client Name: Winzler & Kelly


TypePercent in



14-O2-9 11143452Layer: Tan Non-Fibrous Material Chrysotile TraceLayer: Paint ND

Asbestos (Trace)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)

14-O2-10 11143453Layer: Grey Non-Fibrous Material NDLayer: Paint ND


14-O2-11 11143454Layer: White Non-Fibrous Material NDLayer: Paint ND


14-P1-12 11143455Layer: Paint ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:

14-Z6-13 11143456Layer: Tan Fibrous Material Chrysotile 25 %

Asbestos (25%)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (70 %)

14-H1-14 11143457Layer: Red Sheet Flooring NDLayer: Fibrous Backing ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (5 %) Synthetic (10 %)

14-H 1/2-15 11143458Layer: Red Sheet Flooring NDLayer: Fibrous Backing ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (5 %) Synthetic (10 %)

14-AA-16 11143459Layer: Tan Woven Material NDLayer: Paint ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Synthetic (90 %)

14-BB-17 11143460Layer: Tan Woven Material NDLayer: Paint ND

Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Fibrous Glass (90 %)


Report Number: B151939Date Printed: 07/20/11Client Name: Winzler & Kelly


TypePercent in



14-Z6-18 11143461Layer: Grey Semi-Fibrous Material Chrysotile 7 %Layer: Black Coating ND


14-N1-19 11143462Layer: Tan Putty ND


30-P-20 11143463Layer: Paint ND


Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on suchreport. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for theuse and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materialsanalyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples werereceived in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory


Asbestos Bulk Sample Log ..w 'WINZLER&KELLY3831 North Freeway Blvd., Sle 220

Sacramento, CA 95834

Client: Port of San Francisco Date: _7L-:.....!./"t'C--.:./.:.( _

Project: Pier 70. BUilding #. c.. QA....,~ ?,og.U - CJ2AM"Z.~ ,30/ Project #: .;.1::..04,,8"'3...;-1"'0-'-0"'0.:.1 -,- _

C{2A t,Je ,14 I 1Art:;. s;re£t Tb~ Collected By: -'C"'h"'ris"S"'m=ith'- _

"

« (I'

Analytical Method: PLMTurnaround Time: 24 hour

Do not Fax results. Send by Email to:

I:C~h~ri~sis~m~it~h__~c~h~ri:ss~m~it~h~@~w~-a:n~d~-k~.c=o~m~....£~::::~zr(h ~ W'-~- (..!. ,e~LErica Sattar ericasatlar@w aRe ILeeffi ~l.. n.....

CH~IN~~Y~~2 ~ fit 1/11//1

Signature '

rDI?f'tyv,

7-d--r IDate & Time

Date & Time

Client ID:Report Number:Date Received:

M121999

Job ID / Site: 10483-10-001 -Port of San Francisco , 70 - Building # Crane Park , Crane 30H4Plus Abandoned Steel Tower

Winzler & Kelly A31524

FALI Job ID:

Date Analyzed:

A31524-172

Project Manager

West Sacramento, CA 95691

3410 Industrial Blvd., Ste 102

Date Printed: 07/20/1107/20/11

First Reported: 07/20/11

Metals Analysis of Paints

07/19/11


Final Report

Date(s) Collected: 07/18/2011 Total Samples Submitted:Total Samples Analyzed:

8

8

Sample Number Lab Number ResultResult Reporting Method

Analyte Units Limit* Reference

EPA 3050B/74200.096Pb30 P 7 30409429 wt% 0.006

EPA 3050B/74205.5Pb30 P 8 30409430 wt% 0.3

EPA 3050B/74200.23Pb30 P 18 30409431 wt% 0.02

EPA 3050B/74200.044Pb30 P 2 30409432 wt% 0.007

EPA 3050B/742010Pb14 P 3 30409433 wt% 0.7

EPA 3050B/742014Pb14 P 24 30409434 wt% 0.7

EPA 3050B/74204.3Pb14 P 35 30409435 wt% 0.4

EPA 3050B/74200.76PbT P 5 30409436 wt% 0.04

Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results,reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s)tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The clientis solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazardresulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federalguidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard OperatingProcedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.

* The Reporting Limit represents the lowest amount of analyte that the laboratory can confidently detect in the sample, and is not aregulatory level. The Units for the Reporting Limit are the same as the Units for the Final Results.

Daniele Siu, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory

3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218

1 of 1

Client ID:Report Number:Date Received:

M122000

Job ID / Site: 10483-10-001 -Port of San Francisco , 70 - Building # Crane Park , Crane 30H4Plbs Abandome Steel Tower

Winzler & Kelly A31524

FALI Job ID:

Date Analyzed:

A31524-172

Project Manager

West Sacramento, CA 95691

3410 Industrial Blvd., Ste 102

Date Printed: 07/20/1107/20/11

First Reported: 07/20/11

Metals Analysis of Bulks

07/19/11


Final Report

Date(s) Collected: 07/18/2011 Total Samples Submitted:Total Samples Analyzed:

2

2

Sample Number Lab Number ResultResult Reporting Method

Analyte Units Limit* Reference

EPA 3050B/7420390Pb30 Z1 1 30409437 mg/kg 20

EPA 3050B/7420220Pb14 Z1 4 30409438 mg/kg 20

Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results,reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s)tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The clientis solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazardresulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federalguidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard OperatingProcedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.

* The Reporting Limit represents the lowest amount of analyte that the laboratory can confidently detect in the sample, and is not aregulatory level. The Units for the Reporting Limit are the same as the Units for the Final Results.

Daniele Siu, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory

3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218

1 of 1

,

Lead Paint Chip Sample Log W WINZLER&KELLY

3831 North Freeway Blvd., Sis 220Sacramento. CA 95834

Client: Port of San Francisco Date: r- Of -IIProject: Pier 70·8uilding #: C1Z{;\~ ~IL Project #: 10483-10-001

C2A~2 1.0fllj 'P~ Ae,.~ p,..a.a...( 1"t"£<AA. ~C"o"lI",e"ct",e"d-,B"Y"-:---,=C:ch"ris=S"m",it,,h _

('PcL

S; t Lv

Dale & TimeCompany

Winzler & Kelly

Analytical Method: AA -VtJ" TuraroundTime:~~tiP

'Report all Layers

SigrKllur

2

1

CHAIN OF

Signature Com~ny Date & Time

3Signature Company Dale & Time

- - ~ - --~------

www.ghd.com

hazardous materials survey report...project no.1048310001.33101 hazardous materials survey report...

Documents