hcm 9.2 eperformance overview - university of colorado•january 1, 2016 –system auto generated...

13
HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview Business Partner Meetings March 2015

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview

Business Partner Meetings

March 2015

Page 2: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Agenda

• Overview – Templates Built for University Staff, Classified Staff and Faculty

pulling from Position Profile – Manager Self-Service – Work Centers – Approval workflow built-in – Rating History

• Entering Performance Ratings for Plan Year 2015 • Creating the Performance Plan • Checkpoints • Self Evaluation • Peer Review/360o Reviews • Annual Evaluation

Page 3: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

ePerformance Timeline

• Go Live November 1, 2015 – Entering annual performance ratings for 2015 plan year – Review position profiles – building block for 2016 plans

• January 1, 2016 – System auto generated performance plans (going forward,

managers to clone existing or for new employees)

• 2016 Mid-Year Checkpoint - flexible • Optional Self-Evaluation, Peer/360o Reviews • March 1, 2017 deadline for University Staff Annual

Evaluation • May 1, 2017 deadline for Classified Staff Annual

Evaluation

3

Page 4: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Manager Self-Service

Manager Self Service – Performance Management: displays direct reports

4

Page 5: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Review of Historical Ratings

5

Page 6: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Employee Talent Summary

In the Talent Summary Page

6

Page 7: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Performance Work Centers

7

Page 8: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Create Performance Plan – Define Criteria

8

Page 9: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Optional Checkpoints

9

Page 10: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Peer Evaluation

10

Page 11: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Manager/Employee Ratings

11

Page 12: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Annual Review

12

Page 13: HCM 9.2 ePerformance Overview - University of Colorado•January 1, 2016 –System auto generated performance plans (going forward, managers to clone existing or for new employees)

Next Steps

• Campus Review – appropriate Directors in January

• Determine implementation plan/pilot • Identify working group for testing in February • Target communication at March Business

Partner meetings

13