he design curves

Upload: tanojpatro1985

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 He Design Curves

    1/4

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 1

    3. Heat exchanger design

    3.2 Evaluation of the mean temperature

    difference in a heat exchangercont.)

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 2

    Extended use of the LMTD

    Limitations on the use of

    LMTD

    Restricted to the single-pass

    parallel and counter-flow

    configurations

    For other configuration

    LMTD need to be adjusted

    Uis constant (more serious)

    U(T, Configuration)

    Regionally Uniform?

    More severe in lager

    exchanger

    Less serious in compact

    exchanger

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    A typical case of a heat exchanger

    in which Uvaries dramatically.

    Water side

    Hot gas side

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 3

    Extended use of the LMTD

    Limitations Uvariation

    The heat exchangesurface for a steamgenerator

    This PFT-typeintegral-furnaceboiler,with a

    surface area of 4560m2, is notparticularly large.

    About 88% of thearea is in thefurnace tubing and12% is in the boiler.

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 4

    Extended use of the LMTD

    PFT-type boiler

    Side view of PFT boiler

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 5

    Extended use of the LMTD

    LMTD correction factor,F

    For common range of heat exchanger[Bowman 1940]

    F is an LMTD correction factor

    Tt temperature of tube flow, Ts temperature of shell flow

    P is the relative influence of overall temperature difference

    ( on tube flow temperature,

    If one flow remain constant T, then eitherP orR equal 0,F=1

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    =

    R

    intoutt

    outsins

    P

    intins

    intoutt

    TT

    TT

    TT

    TTFLMTDUAQ ,)(

    st CCR /=

    1

  • 8/13/2019 He Design Curves

    2/4

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 7

    Extended use of the LMTD

    F for a one-shell-pass, four, six, tube-pass exchanger

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    )/1,(),( RPRFRPF = ForR > 1, Shamsundar noted

    in out

    out in

    s s

    t t

    T TR

    T T

    =

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 8

    Extended use of the LMTD

    F for a two-shell-pass, four or more tube-pass exchanger

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    )/1,(),( RPRFRPF = ForR > 1, Shamsundar noted

    in out

    out in

    s s

    t t

    T TR

    T T

    =

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 9

    Extended use of the LMTD

    F for a cross-flow exchanger with both passes unmixed

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    )/1,(),( RPRFRPF = ForR > 1, Shamsundar noted

    in out

    out in

    s s

    t t

    T TR

    T T

    =

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 10

    Extended use of the LMTD

    F for a cross-flow exchanger with one passes mixed

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    )/1,(),( RPRFRPF = ForR > 1, Shamsundar noted

    in out

    out in

    s s

    t t

    T TR

    T T

    =

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 11

    Example 3.4

    Known :Cpoil and U. To find: A=?

    K

    TT

    TT

    TTTT

    incouth

    outcinh

    incouthoutcinh

    76.40

    3238

    49181ln

    )3238()49181(

    )ln(

    )()(LMTD

    =

    =

    =Oil

    Cooler

    114.0P412.8 =

    ==

    =

    intins

    intoutt

    intoutt

    outsins

    TT

    TT

    TT

    TTR

    )/1,(),( RPRFRPF = AsR > 1

    119.0/1,959.0 == RPR

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

    Water

    32oC

    38oC

    49oC

    5.795kg/s Oil 181oC

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 12

    Example 3.4

    AsR > 1 )/1,(),( RPRFRPF =

    119.0/1,959.0 == RPR 92.0=F

    )(LMTDUAFQ=

    2121.2

    )(

    )(

    )(

    m

    LMTDUF

    TTcm

    LMTDUF

    QA

    outsinsp

    =

    =

    =

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.2 Evaluation of t he mean t emperaturedifference in a heat exchanger

  • 8/13/2019 He Design Curves

    3/4

  • 8/13/2019 He Design Curves

    4/4

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 19

    Example 3.5

    Known: parallel-flow heat exchanger, Tcin=49oC,Cc=20000W/K, Thin=150

    oC, Ch=10000W/K,A=30 m2 ,

    U=500W/m2K

    To find: Q=?, Tcout=?, Thout=?

    Cannot find LMTD

    5.1NTUmin

    ==C

    UA

    5.0max

    min =C

    C

    NTU

    596.0=

    kW6.655)(min

    ==incinh

    TTCQ

    C

    C

    QTT

    CC

    QTT

    o

    c

    incoutc

    o

    h

    inhouth

    78.72

    44.84

    ==

    ==

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.3 Heat exchanger effectiveness

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 20

    Example 3.6

    Same kind of heat exchanger as Example 3.5.Thout=90

    oC

    To findA=?

    NTU=1.15=UA/Cmin .

    A=23.0m2 .

    LMTD=52.79K

    Q=UA(LMTD)

    A=22.730m2

    .

    CC

    TTCTT

    o

    c

    inhouthh

    incoutc70

    )(=

    =

    5455.0)(

    )(

    min

    =

    incinh

    outhinhh

    TTC

    TTC

    NTU

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.3 Heat exchanger effectiveness

    Or

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 21

    Heat exchanger design

    Small exchanger, typically the kind of compact cross-

    flow exchanger

    The method described before

    Larger exchanger pose difficulty in relation to U

    The variation of Uthrough the exchanger

    Hard to predict convective heat transfer coefficienth

    Minimization of pumping power

    Minimization of fixed costs

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.4 Heat exchanger design

    )(powerPumping Wpm

    =

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 22

    Heat exchanger design

    Lager exchanger design process

    Decide which fluid should flow in the shell side

    which tube side

    Pumping power, corrosion behavior, fouling, cleaning

    Assess the cost of calculation

    The converging accuracy of computation

    The investment in the exchanger

    The cost of miscalculation

    Rough estimate of the size of the exchanger by using Uand

    experience

    Evaluate the Q, p, and the cost of various exchanger

    configurations that appear reasonable for the application

    Might involve 200 successive redesign

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.4 Heat exchanger desi gn

    College of Energy and Power Engineering JHH 23

    Homework

    3.20

    3.28

    300140 441241

    2

    3

    2.25kg/s2000J/(kg*K)80560W/(m2K),8m21240

    3. Heat exchanger design 3.4 Heat exchanger design