health and human services: app10

8/14/2019 Health and Human Services: App10

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/health-and-human-services-app10 1/91

TANF Sixth Annual Report to Congress Appendix A-189

APPENDIX

Chapter 10

TANF Families and Households

Table 10:1 Percent Distribution of TANF Households by Number of Persons Living

in the Household, FY 2002

Table 10:2 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipients, FY

2002

Table 10:3 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Adult Recipients,FY 2002

Table 10:4 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipient Children,

FY 2002

Table 10:5 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with No Adults by Number of

Recipient Children, FY 2002

Table 10:6 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with One Adult by Number of


Table 10:7 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Two or More Adults by

Number of Recipient Children, FY 2002

Table 10:8 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Ethnicity/Race, FY 2002

Table 10:9 Percent Distribution of All Adults Living in the Household by the Family

Affiliation, FY 2002

Table 10:10 Percent Distribution of TANF Teen Recipients with Teen Parent Status,FY 2002

Table 10:11 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Teen Parents by Relationship toHead of Household, FY 2002

Table 10:12 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Parents Not In the Assistance

Unit - Reasons for Parents Living in the Household but Not in the

Assistant Unit (AU) , FY 2002

Table 10:13 Percent Distribution of TANF Families Receiving Other Assistance, FY

2002

Table 10:14 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Receipt of Child Support andwith Cash Resources, FY 2002



A-190 Appendix TANF Sixth Annual Report to Congre

Table 10:15 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by General Reason for Grant

Reduction, FY 2002

Table 10:16 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Specific Reason for GrantReduction, FY 2002

Table 10:17 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by the Federal Time Limit

Exemption Status, FY 2002

Table 10:18 Percent Distribution of Head of Household or Spouse Who Received

Assistance by Number of Months Countable toward the Federal Time

Limit, FY 2002

Adult Recipients

Table 10:19 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Age Group, FY 2002

Table 10:20 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Adult Recipients by Age Group, FY2002

Table 10:21 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Adult Recipients by Age Group, FY

2002

Table 10:22 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Ethnicity/Race, FY

2002

Table 10:23 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Marital Status, FY2002

Table 10:24 Percent Distribution of TANF Adults Receiving Disability Benefits, FY2002

Table 10:25 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Relationship to the

Head of Household, FY 2002

Table 10:26 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Educational Level, FY

2002

Table 10:27 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Citizenship Status, FY

2002

Table 10:28 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Work Participation

Status, FY 2002

Table 10:29 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients Participating in Work Activities, FY 2002




Table 10:30 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Average Weekly Hours

Participation in Work Activities, FY 2002

Table 10:31 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Employment Status,FY 2002

Table 10:32 Percent Distribution of TANF Male/Female Adult Recipients by

Employment Status, FY 2002

Recipient Children

Table 10:33 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Age Group, FY 2002

Table 10:34 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Recipient Children by Age Group, FY2002

Table 10:35 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Recipient Children by Age Group,

FY 2002

Table 10:36 Percent Distribution of TANF Youngest Child Recipient by Age Group,

FY 2002

Table 10:37 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Ethnicity/Race, FY

2002

Table 10:38 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children Receiving Disability

Benefits, FY 2002

Table 10:39 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Relationship to theHead of Household, FY 2002

Table 10:40 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children in TANF Families withNo Adult Recipients by Relationship to Head of Household, FY 2002

Table 10:41 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Educational Level,FY 2002

Table 10:42 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Citizenship Status,

FY 2002

Financial Circumstances

Table 10:43 TANF Families Receiving Cash Assistance by Number of RecipientChildren, FY 2002

Table 10:44 TANF Families with No Adult Recipients Receiving Cash Assistance, FY

2002




Table 10:45 TANF Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income, FY 2002

Table 10:46 TANF Adult Recipients with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income, FY

2002

Table 10:47 TANF Recipient Children with Unearned Income, FY 2002

Closed Cases

Table 10:48 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Reason for

Closure, FY 2002

Table 10:49 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Number of Family

Members, FY 2002

Table 10:50 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Number of


Table 10:51 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Ethnicity/Race,FY 2002

Table 10:52 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families that Received OtherAssistance, FY 2002

Table 10:53 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Age

Group, FY 2002

Table 10:54 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Recipient Children by Age

Group, FY 2002

Table 10:55 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Youngest Child Recipient by

Age Group, FY 2002

Table 10:56 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Marital

Status, FY 2002

Table 10:57 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients byEducational Level, FY 2002

Table 10:58 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by

Employment Status, FY 2002

Table 10:59 TANF Closed-Case Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income,

FY 2002




SSP-MOE Recipients

Table 10:60 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of Family

Members, FY 2002

Table 10:61 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of RecipientChildren, FY 2002

Table 10:62 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Ethnicity/Race, FY 2002

Table 10:63 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families Receiving Assistance, FY2002

Table 10:64 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Age Group, FY2002

Table 10:65 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Marital Status, FY

2002

Table 10:66 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Educational Level,

FY 2002

Table 10:67 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Work Participation

Status, FY 2002

Table 10:68 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Citizenship Status,

FY 2002

Table 10:69 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Employment

Status, FY 2002

Table 10:70 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients Participating in Work Activities, FY 2002

Table 10:71 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Recipient Children by Age Group, FY

2002

Table 10:72 SSP-MOE Families Receiving Cash Assistance and Average Monthly

Amount by Number of Recipient Children, FY 2002

Table 10:73 SSP-MOE Families with Income by Type of Non-SSP Income, FY 2002

Table 10:74 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Closed Case Families by Reason for

Closure, FY 2002




Reliability of Estimates

Table 10:75 Average Monthly TANF Active Caseload, Sample Size, Sample Fraction

and Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From TrueValue at the 95 Percent Confidence Level, FY 2002

Table 10:76 Total Number of Annual TANF Closed Cases, Sample Size, Sample

Fraction and Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From

True Value at the 95 Percent Confidence Level, FY 2002

Table 10:77 Approximate Standard Error of Estimated Percentages of TANF Recipient

Families for FY 2002

Table 10:78 Significant Differences for Percentage Values between the United States

and States with Samples of 3,000, FY 2002

Table 10:79 Significant Differences for Percentage Values between States with

Samples of 3,000, FY 2002




Table 10:75

Average Monthly TANF Active Caseload, Sample Size, Sample Fraction andPercent by which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary from True Value at the 95

Percent Confidence LevelFY 2002

State

AverageMonthly

CaseloadAnnual

Sample Size

AverageMonthlySample

SamplingFractionPercent

Percent That50% Values

At 95%Confidence

Level

Alabama 18,037 3,085 257 1.4 7.0

Alaska 6,033 3,300 275 4.6 6.3

Arizona 40,097 3,300 275 0.7 7.0

Arkansas 12,025 3,181 265 2.2 7.2

California 462,320 3,193 266 0.1 6.6Colorado 12,086 3,757 313 2.6 6.5

Connecticut 23,691 2,984 249 1.1 6.4

Delaware 5,469 3,300 275 5.0 6.0

Dist. of Col. 16,342 3,341 278 1.7 7.4

Florida 59,013 3,299 275 0.5 5.9

Georgia 53,672 3,300 275 0.5 6.2

Guam A/ - - - -

Hawaii 10,887 3,300 275 2.5 6.4

Idaho 1,368 2,887 241 17.6 6.3

Illinois 48,091 3,064 255 0.5 6.6

Indiana 49,174 3,300 275 0.6 6.2Iowa 20,154 3,300 275 1.4 6.8

Kansas 13,930 3,300 275 2.0 6.7

Kentucky 34,904 3,300 275 0.8 6.8

Louisiana 23,700 3,300 275 1.2 7.3

Maine 9,688 3,246 271 2.8 7.2

Maryland 27,132 3,144 262 1.0 6.2

Massachusetts 47,264 3,103 259 0.6 7.3

Michigan 74,337 4,278 357 0.5 7.9

Minnesota 35,859 6,390 533 1.5 4.5

Mississippi 17,613 3,626 302 1.7 6.3

Missouri 45,002 3,168 264 0.6 7.1Montana 5,828 3,300 275 4.7 6.2

Nebraska 10,320 3,621 302 2.9 6.2

Nevada 11,015 3,135 261 2.4 7.0

NewHampshire

6,054 3,299 275 4.5 6.8

New Jersey 41,985 3,300 275 0.7 6.2

New Mexico 17,015 3,254 271 1.6 7.0




Table 10:75

Average Monthly TANF Active Caseload, Sample Size, Sample Fraction andPercent by which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary from True Value at the 95


State

AverageMonthly

CaseloadAnnual

Sample Size

AverageMonthlySample


Percent That50% Values

At 95%Confidence

Level

New York 170,258 3,420 285 0.2 6.9

North Carolina 42,872 3,892 324 0.8 6.2

North Dakota 3,225 3,300 275 8.5 5.8

Ohio 84,031 30,553 2,546 3.0 1.9

Oklahoma 14,955 3,300 275 1.8 6.8

Oregon 17,928 3,300 275 1.5 6.7

Pennsylvania 79,672 3,300 275 0.4 6.9

Puerto Rico 23,363 3,002 250 1.1 6.5

Rhode Island 14,402 3,300 275 1.9 7.3

South Carolina 20,713 3,153 263 1.3 6.9

South Dakota 2,851 3,262 272 9.5 5.9

Tennessee 63,036 3,300 275 0.4 6.0

Texas 129,937 3,401 283 0.2 6.8

Utah 7,755 3,300 275 3.6 6.2

Vermont 5,113 3,300 275 5.4 6.5

Virgin Islands 618 3,300 275 44.5 4.7

Virginia 30,051 3,300 275 0.9 6.2

Washington 54,189 3,300 275 0.5 6.4West Virginia 15,855 5,450 454 2.9 5.1

Wisconsin 18,956 3,300 275 1.5 6.9

Wyoming 453 2,540 212 46.7 5.1

Note: ‘A/’= Data not reported.




Table 10:76

Total Number of Annual TANF Closed Cases, Sample Size, Sample Fraction andPercent by which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From True Value at the 95


StateTotal Number ofClosed Cases

Annual SampleSize


Percent That50% Values At

95%Confidence

Level

Alabama 17,368 1,200 6.9 2.7

Alaska 5,919 1,200 20.3 2.5

Arizona 38,102 1,200 3.2 2.8

Arkansas 10,729 807 7.5 3.3

California 436,840 895 0.2 3.3

Colorado 24,396 1,200 4.9 2.8Connecticut 18,753 982 5.2 3.0

Delaware 6,228 1,200 19.3 2.5

Dist. of Col. 5,568 814 14.6 3.2

Florida 125,167 888 0.7 3.3

Georgia 45,728 1,200 2.6 2.8

Guam A/ - - -

Hawaii 8,957 1,200 13.4 2.6

Idaho 1,977 1,200 60.7 1.8

Illinois 41,210 756 1.8 3.5

Indiana 32,648 1,200 3.7 2.8

Iowa 22,747 1,200 5.3 2.8Kansas 16,890 1,200 7.1 2.7

Kentucky 40,629 1,200 3.0 2.8

Louisiana 23,138 1,200 5.2 2.8

Maine 7,228 1,200 16.6 2.6

Maryland 33,359 838 2.5 3.3

Massachusetts 26,640 987 3.7 3.1

Michigan 77,433 983 1.3 3.1

Minnesota 41,871 1,200 2.9 2.8

Mississippi 14,068 935 6.7 3.1

Missouri 33,945 840 2.5 3.3

Montana 7,972 1,200 15.1 2.6Nebraska 10,901 3,621 33.2 1.3

Nevada 11,004 841 7.6 3.3

New Hampshire 6,109 1,200 19.6 2.5

New Jersey 41,080 1,200 2.9 2.8

New Mexico 33,256 804 2.4 3.4

New York 179,577 979 0.6 3.1

North Carolina 56,535 993 1.8 3.1




Table 10:76

Total Number of Annual TANF Closed Cases, Sample Size, Sample Fraction andPercent by which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From True Value at the 95


StateTotal Number ofClosed Cases

Annual SampleSize


Percent That50% Values At

95%Confidence

Level

North Dakota 9,292 4,017 43.2 1.2

Ohio 95,645 1,520 1.6 2.5

Oklahoma 24,511 1,200 4.9 2.8

Oregon 17,454 1,200 6.9 2.7

Pennsylvania 24,655 1,200 4.9 2.8

Puerto Rico 7,181 753 10.5 3.4

Rhode Island 10,023 1,200 12.0 2.7South Carolina 21,178 850 4.0 3.3

South Dakota 3,502 871 24.9 2.9

Tennessee 38,942 1,200 3.1 2.8

Texas 130,938 879 0.7 5.5

Utah 12,561 1,200 9.6 2.7

Vermont 4,795 1,200 25.0 2.4

Virgin Islands 501 482 96.2 0.9

Virginia 22,818 1,200 5.3 2.8

Washington 63,425 1,200 1.9 2.8

West Virginia 12,747 959 7.5 3.0

Wisconsin 22,162 1,200 5.4 2.8Wyoming 581 581 100.0 0.0

Note: ‘A/’=Data not reported.




Table 10:77

Approximate Standard Error of Estimated Percentages ofTANF Recipient Families

FY 2002Estimated

Percentage Standard ErrorEstimated

Percentage Standard Error1........ 0.08 26........ 0.37

2........ 0.12 27........ 0.37

3........ 0.14 28........ 0.38

4........ 0.16 29........ 0.38

5........ 0.18 30........ 0.38

6........ 0.20 31........ 0.39

7........ 0.21 32........ 0.39

8........ 0.23 33........ 0.39

9........ 0.24 34........ 0.4010........ 0.25 35........ 0.40

11........ 0.26 36........ 0.40

12........ 0.27 37........ 0.40

13........ 0.28 38........ 0.41

14........ 0.29 39........ 0.41

15........ 0.30 40........ 0.41

16........ 0.31 41........ 0.41

17........ 0.31 42........ 0.41

18........ 0.32 43........ 0.41

19........ 0.33 44........ 0.4120........ 0.33 45........ 0.42

21........ 0.34 46........ 0.42

22........ 0.35 47........ 0.42

23........ 0.35 48........ 0.42

24........ 0.36 49........ 0.42

25........ 0.36 50........ 0.42

Based on a sample of 14,230 cases out of a total of 2,060,328 cases or 0.69064792percent of the caseload. This is the same sample percentage as California.




Table 10:78

Significant Differences for Percentage Values between the United States andStates with Samples of 3,000

FY 2002

Percentage Value at WhichDifferences become

Significant


SignificantEstimated

Percentage Upper Lower

EstimatedPercentage Upper Lower

1........ 1.5 0.6 51........ 53.0 48.9

2........ 2.6 1.4 52........ 54.0 49.9

3........ 3.7 2.3 53........ 55.0 50.9

4........ 4.8 3.2 54........ 55.9 51.9

5........ 5.9 4.1 55........ 56.9 52.9

6........ 7.0 5.0 56........ 57.9 53.97........ 8.1 6.0 57........ 58.9 54.9

8........ 9.1 6.9 58........ 59.9 56.0

9........ 10.2 7.8 59........ 60.9 57.0

10........ 11.2 8.8 60........ 61.9 58.0

11........ 12.3 9.7 61........ 62.9 59.0

12........ 13.3 10.7 62........ 63.9 60.0

13........ 14.4 11.6 63........ 64.9 61.0

14........ 15.4 12.6 64........ 65.9 62.0

15........ 16.4 13.5 65........ 66.9 63.0

16........ 17.5 14.5 66........ 67.8 64.0

17........ 18.5 15.5 67........ 68.8 65.018........ 19.5 16.4 68........ 69.8 66.0

19........ 20.6 17.4 69........ 70.8 67.1

20........ 21.6 18.4 70........ 71.8 68.1

21........ 22.6 19.3 71........ 72.8 69.1

22........ 23.7 20.3 72........ 73.7 70.1

23........ 24.7 21.3 73........ 74.7 71.1

24........ 25.7 22.3 74........ 75.7 72.1

25........ 26.7 23.2 75........ 76.7 73.2

26........ 27.8 24.2 76........ 77.6 74.2

27........ 28.8 25.2 77........ 78.6 75.2

28........ 29.8 26.2 78........ 79.6 76.229........ 30.8 27.1 79........ 80.6 77.3

30........ 31.8 28.1 80........ 81.5 78.3

31........ 32.8 29.1 81........ 82.5 79.3

32........ 33.9 30.1 82........ 83.5 80.4

33........ 34.9 31.1 83........ 84.4 81.4

34........ 35.9 32.1 84........ 85.4 82.4

35........ 36.9 33.0 85........ 86.4 83.5




Table 10:78

Significant Differences for Percentage Values between the United States andStates with Samples of 3,000

FY 2002


Significant


SignificantEstimated



36........ 37.9 34.0 86........ 87.3 84.5

37........ 38.9 35.0 87........ 88.3 85.5

38........ 39.9 36.0 88........ 89.2 86.6

39........ 40.9 37.0 89........ 90.2 87.6

40........ 41.9 38.0 90........ 91.1 88.7

41........ 42.9 39.0 91........ 92.1 89.7

42........ 43.9 40.0 92........ 93.0 90.8

43........ 45.0 41.0 93........ 93.9 91.844........ 46.0 42.0 94........ 94.9 92.9

45........ 47.0 43.0 95........ 95.8 94.0

46........ 48.0 43.9 96........ 96.7 95.1

47........ 49.0 44.9 97........ 97.6 96.2

48........ 50.0 45.9 98........ 98.5 97.3

49........ 51.0 46.9 99........ 99.3 98.4

50........ 52.0 47.9




Table 10:79

Significant Differences for Percentage Values between States withSamples of 3,000

FY 2002

Percentage Value at WhichDifferences Become

Significant

Percentage Value at WhichDifferences Become

SignificantEstimatedPercentage Upper Lower


1........ 1.6 0.5 51........ 53.5 48.4

2........ 2.8 1.3 52........ 54.5 49.4

3........ 3.9 2.1 53........ 55.5 50.4

4........ 5.1 3.0 54........ 56.5 51.4

5........ 6.2 3.9 55........ 57.5 52.4

6........ 7.3 4.8 56........ 58.5 53.4

7........ 8.3 5.7 57........ 59.5 54.4

8........ 9.4 6.6 58........ 60.5 55.4

9........ 10.5 7.5 59........ 61.5 56.4

10........ 11.6 8.4 60........ 62.5 57.4

11........ 12.6 9.4 61........ 63.5 58.4

12........ 13.7 10.3 62........ 64.4 59.4

13........ 14.7 11.2 63........ 65.4 60.4

14........ 15.8 12.2 64........ 66.4 61.5

15........ 16.9 13.1 65........ 67.4 62.5

16........ 17.9 14.1 66........ 68.4 63.5

17........ 18.9 15.0 67........ 69.4 64.5

18........ 20.0 16.0 68........ 70.3 65.5

19........ 21.0 17.0 69........ 71.3 66.5

20........ 22.1 17.9 70........ 72.3 67.6

21........ 23.1 18.9 71........ 73.3 68.6

22........ 24.1 19.8 72........ 74.2 69.6

23........ 25.2 20.8 73........ 75.2 70.6

24........ 26.2 21.8 74........ 76.2 71.7

25........ 27.2 22.7 75........ 77.2 72.7

26........ 28.2 23.7 76........ 78.1 73.7

27........ 29.3 24.7 77........ 79.1 74.7

28........ 30.3 25.7 78........ 80.1 75.8

29........ 31.3 26.6 79........ 81.0 76.8

30........ 32.3 27.6 80........ 82.0 77.8

31........ 33.4 28.6 81........ 82.9 78.9

32........ 34.4 29.6 82........ 83.9 79.9

33........ 35.4 30.5 83........ 84.9 81.0

34........ 36.4 31.5 84........ 85.8 82.0

35........ 37.4 32.5 85........ 86.8 83.0



Table 10:79

Significant Differences for Percentage Values between States withSamples of 3,000

FY 2002

Percentage Value at WhichDifferences BecomeSignificant

Percentage Value at WhichDifferences BecomeSignificantEstimated



36........ 38.4 33.5 86........ 87.7 84.1

37........ 39.5 34.5 87........ 88.7 85.2

38........ 40.5 35.5 88........ 89.6 86.2

39........ 41.5 36.4 89........ 90.5 87.3

40........ 42.5 37.4 90........ 91.5 88.3

41........ 43.5 38.4 91........ 92.4 89.4

42........ 44.5 39.4 92........ 93.3 90.5

43........ 45.5 40.4 93........ 94.2 91.6

44........ 46.5 41.4 94........ 95.1 92.6

45........ 47.5 42.4 95........ 96.0 93.7

46........ 48.5 43.4 96........ 96.9 94.8

47........ 49.5 44.4 97........ 97.8 96.0

48........ 50.5 45.4 98........ 98.6 97.1

49........ 51.5 46.4 99........ 99.4 98.3

50........ 52.5 47.4

health and human services: app10

Documents