healthcare worker needle prick injury
DESCRIPTION
A research on the awareness and preparedness of Healthcare workers on needle prick injuries at EAMCTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Knowledge, Attitude and Practices
Questionnaires on Needlestick Injury
among Health Care Workers
at East Avenue Medical
Center
Rizelle F. Jimenez, MDFloravil M. Mabras, MD
Presentors
Danilo M. Castro, MD, MHA, FPSMID, FPCPAdviser
![Page 2: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
All healthcare workers are at risk of occupational
transmission of blood-borne pathogens because of
frequent exposure to blood.
![Page 3: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The risk of exposure to blood-borne pathogen is primarily due to
NEEDLESTICK INJURY.
![Page 4: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The HBV infection is a
well-recognized occupational risk.
HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV)
![Page 5: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
HEPATITIS B VIRUS
• Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and/or hepatitis B vaccine
![Page 6: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HEPATITIS C VIRUS (HCV)
HCV is not transmitted efficiently through
occupational exposures to blood.
![Page 7: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
HEPATITIS C VIRUS
No vaccination recommended.
![Page 8: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
HUMAN IMMUNODEFFICIENCY VIRUS
CDC reported 57 confirmed and 137 suspected cases of occupational HIV
transmission
![Page 9: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
HUMAN IMMUNODEFFICIENCY
VIRUS
4-week regimen drugs Zidovudine & Lamivudine Lamivudine & Stavudine Didanosine & Stavudine
within hours after the exposure
![Page 10: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NSI in the United States:Epidemiologic, Economic, and Quality of Life Issues
Incidence of NSI is significantly higher than reported
Substantial economic cost Occupational and behavioral changes
Lee JM, Botteman MF, Xanthakos N, Nicklasson L. AAOHN J. 2005 Mar;53(3):117-33.
![Page 11: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Tanberg, Stewart et al (1991)o Perception of risk, occupation, years in
occupation and concern about paperwork were the most powerful predictors of low reporting rate of NSI.
Rampal, Zakaria et al (2010)o 99.1% vs 30.9% o gaps between knowledge and practice
![Page 12: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2011 Needlestick Injury at EAMC
Janu
ary
Febr
uary
Mar
chAp
rilMay
June Ju
ly
Augu
st
Sept
embe
r
Octob
er
Novem
ber
Decem
ber
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
1 1
2
1
3
0
6
2 2
0
4
![Page 13: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2001 - 2011 Needlestick Injury at EAMC
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
5
10
15
20
25
30
13
75
1
8 7 8
19 19
25
![Page 14: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2001 - 2011 Needlestick Injury at EAMC
Med Intern
Staff Nurse
Con Staff Nurse
Volunteer Nurse
RN Heals
OJT
Student Nurse
Nursing Aid
Med Tech Intern
Janitor
Clinical Intrauctor
2
2
2
3
0
0
2
5
0
3
0
2
6
1
6
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
2011 2010
![Page 15: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
To assess knowledge, attitude and
practices on transmissions and post-
exposure prophylaxis of HBV, HCV
and HIV through NSI among
healthcare workers.
EAMC
![Page 16: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
1. To validate the knowledge, attitude and practices questionnaires on needle-stick injury.
2. To assess the knowledge of healthcare workers on the following topics: HBV, HCV, HIV: risk of sero-conversion after
NSI HBV, HCV, HIV: PEP medications and timing
of administration of the medications after NSI
EAMC
![Page 17: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cont. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES3. To assess the attitude of healthcare workers on the
following: o Protocol at EAMC regarding NSIo HBV, HCV, HIV: risk of seroconversion after NSIo PEP after NSI
To assess the practices of healthcare workers on NSI :o Frequency and percentage of healthcare workers
who had NSI
EAMC
![Page 18: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
![Page 19: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects
1.TARGET POPULATION
2. Duration3. Inclusion Criteria4. Exclusion Criteria5. Sample Size /
Sampling Design
B. Description Of Study Procedure
Healthcare workers at East Avenue Medical
Center namely: 1. Nurses2. Medical Residents3. Medical
Technologists
![Page 20: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects1. Target Population
2.DURATION3. Inclusion Criteria4. Exclusion Criteria5. Sample Size /
Sampling Design
B. Description Of Study Procedure
July to November 2012
![Page 21: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects1. Target Population2. Duration
3.INCLUSION CRITERIA
4. Exclusion Criteria5. Sample Size /
Sampling Design
B. Description Of Study Procedure
1.Nurses
2.Medical Technologists
3.Medical Residents
![Page 22: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects1. Target Population2. Duration3. Inclusion Criteria
4.EXCLUSION CRITERIA
5. Sample Size / Sampling Design
B. Description Of Study Procedure
• HCW who were given the questionnaire but failed to return it.
• HCW who were contractual workers and volunteers at our institution.
• Nursing aides and janitors
![Page 23: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects1. Target Population2. Duration3. Inclusion Criteria4. Exclusion Criteria
5.SAMPLE SIZE / SAMPLING DESIGN
B. Description Of Study Procedure
HEALTHCARE WORKERS TOTAL Pilot Testing Research
1. Nurses 516 72 225
2. MedicalTechnologist 7 1 7
3. Medical Residents 177 25 129
3.1. Anesthesia 14 2 10
3.2. Dermatology 11 2 8
3.3. Emergency Medicine 9 1 7
3.4. General Surgery 16 2 12
3.5. Internal Medicine 28 4 20
3.6. Ophthalmology 14 2 10
3.7. Orthopedics 5 1 4
3.8. Otolaryngology 18 3 13
3.9.Obstetrics – Gynecology
17 2 12
3.10. Pathology 8 1 6
3.11. Pediatrics 19 3 14
3.12. Radiology 11 2 8
3.13. Urology 7 1 5
TOTAL 700 98 361
![Page 24: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
A. Study Subjects1. Target Population2. Duration3. Inclusion Criteria4. Exclusion Criteria5. Sample Size /
Sampling Design
B. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY PROCEDURE
Questionnaire development
Pilot Testing
adjudication process of questionnaire
Reliability Testing
Administer the KAP questionnaire
![Page 25: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
QUESTIONNAIRE
![Page 26: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dear Sir/Madam:
Good day!
We, Rizelle F. Jimenez, MD and Floravil Mabras, MD, third year medical residents of the Department of Internal Medicine, are conducting a survey on the “Validation of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Questionnaires on Needle-Stick Injury among Healthcare workers at East Avenue Medical Center.”
All of your responses are confidential. Once they are collected, there will be no way to connect your name with the questionnaire you completed. Your responses will be combined with others in order to analyse the data.
If you need help in completing this survey or have any questions, please ask us.
When you have completed the survey, please return it to us or drop at the Medical Office, 5th floor.
Thank you in advance for providing this information. Please feel free to write your comments. We will greatly appreciate it. Sincerely yours, RIZELLE F. JIMENEZ, MD FLORAVIL M. MABRAS, MDDepartment of Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine East Avenue Medical Center East Avenue Medical Center
Cover Letter
![Page 27: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Continuation of part II
![Page 30: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
DEFINITION
KNOWLEDGE PART Score Percentage
Knowledgeable 15 to 19 75 to 100 %
Not Knowledgeable 0 to 14 0 to 74%
![Page 31: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Continuation of part III
![Page 33: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
DEFINITION
ATTITUDE PART Score
Positive 68 to 85
Negative 17 to 67
![Page 34: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
DATA ANALYSIS FREQUENCY TABLE
frequency distribution table Shapiro-Wilks test Cronbach’s α (alpha) and Kappa statistic Factor Analysis will be used to assess where
the items fall into which construct. The greater the variance attributable to the
constructs will be the higher the validity of the instrument.
R version 2.12.2 and Epi Info versions 6 and 3.5.1 will be used for the data processing and data analysis.
![Page 36: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
DATA ANALYSIS FREQUENCY TABLE
R version 2.12.2 and Epi Info versions 6 and 3.5.1 will be used for the data processing and data analysis.
![Page 37: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
RESULTS
![Page 38: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
700 HCW
Pilot TestingData
Gathering
98 HCW361 HCW
7 HCW Failed to return the
questionnaire
KAP Questionnaire
![Page 39: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Age Freq %
20-24 97 29.22
25-29 138 41.57
30-34 67 20.18
35-39 18 5.42
40-44 5 1.51
45-49 7 2.11
Total 332
• average age: 27.79 y/o
• SD: 4.94 years
• Median age: 27 y/o
• Oldest age: 49 y/o
• Youngest age: 21 y/o
![Page 40: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Sex Freq %
Male 157 45.38
Female 189 54.62
Total 346
![Page 41: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Profession Freq %
Medical Resident 1st year 45 12.89
Medical Resident 2nd year 45 12.89
Medical Resident 3rd year 26 7.45
Medical Resident 4th year 2 0.57
Medical Resident 5th year 2 0.57
Staff Nurse 223 63.90
Medical Technologist 6 1.72
Total 349
![Page 42: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Educational Attainment Freq %
MD 129 36.03
Med tech 6 1.68
Nursing 219 61.86
Total 354
![Page 43: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Duration as Health
WorkerFreq %
<5 years 295 84.53
6 - 10 years 47 13.47
11 - 20 years 5 1.43
> 20 years 2 0.57
Total 349
Year of Employment Freq %
Before 2000 6 1.80
2000 1 0.30
2003 7 2.10
2004 3 0.90
2005 7 2.10
2006 10 3.00
2007 3 0.90
2008 10 3.00
2009 32 9.61
2010 48 14.41
2011 134 40.24
2012 72 21.62
Total 333
![Page 44: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
NSI Injuries in the Past 6 Months Freq %
Yes 139 39.83
No 205 58.74
Total 344
Number of Injuries in the Past 6 Months Freq %
None 205 58.74
1 to 2 86 24.29
3 to 5 37 10.45
> 6 10 2.82
Can't Remember 11 3.11
No answer 5 1.41
Total 354
![Page 45: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Vaccination against HBV Freq %
Yes 319 91.40
No 30 8.60
Total 349
With Antibodies against HBV Freq %
Yes 48 13.6
No 222 62.89
Don't Know 83 23.51
Total 353 100
![Page 46: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Cont. Table 1: Demographic Profile & Medical Background of the Healthcare Workers (N=354)
Needle Stick Injury Training Freq %
Yes 105 30.43
No 240 69.57
Total 345
NSI Protocol Freq %
Yes 237 67.91
No 109 31.23
Total 346
![Page 47: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers (N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. Hep B Surface Antigen 304 85.88 50 14.12 354 7 1.94
B. Hep B Envelope Antigen 246 69.49 108 30.51 354 7 1.94
C. Hep C Virus 201 56.78 153 43.22 354 7 1.94
D. HIV 294 83.05 60 16.95 354 7 1.94
E. No Idea 16 4.53 337 95.47 353 8 2.22
Number of People Correct 163 46.05 191 53.95 354 7 1.94
Q1: You sustained a NSI while disposing of a syringe used to a patient suspected to be immunocompromised. What profile of the patient would you like to know?
![Page 48: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Cont. Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. Hep B Vaccine 175 49.44 179 50.56 354 7 1.94
B. Hep B Immunoglobin 274 77.40 80 22.60 354 7 1.94
C. No vaccine or medication available
31 8.76 323 91.24 354 7 1.94
Number of People Correct 136 38.42 218 61.58 354 7 1.94
Q2: You got the report that your patient was positive of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen, what compromises post-exposure prophylaxis?
![Page 49: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Cont. Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. Hep C Vaccine 110 31.07 244 68.93 354 7 1.94
B. Hep C immunoglobin 212 60.06 141 39.94 353 8 2.22
C. No vaccine or medication available
99 27.97 255 72.03 354 7 1.94
Number of People Correct 99 27.97 255 72.03 354 7 1.94
Q3: Patient was positive for Hepatitis C virus, what compromises post-exposure prophylaxis?
![Page 50: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Cont. Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. Zidovudine 159 44.92 195 55.08 354 7 1.94
B. Lamivudine 131 37.01 223 62.99 354 7 1.94
C. Didanosine 62 17.71 288 82.29 350 11 3.05
D. Stavudine 58 16.38 296 83.62 354 7 1.94
E. No vaccine or medication available
89 25.14 265 74.86 354 7 1.94
Number of People Correct 38 10.86 312 89.14 350 11 3.05
Q4: What compromises post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV?
![Page 51: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Cont. Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. within 24 hrs 216 61.02 138 38.98 354 7 1.94
B. 2 to 7 days 89 25.14 265 74.86 354 7 1.94
C. Later than 7 days 18 5.08 336 94.92 354 7 1.94
D. No idea 58 16.38 296 83.62 354 7 1.94
Q5: How soon post-exposure prophylaxis should be given?
![Page 52: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Cont Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
YES NO TOTAL MISSING
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
A. Deep wounds 263 74.29 91 25.71 354 7 1.94
B. Visible blood on instrument 220 62.15 134 37.85 354 7 1.94
C. NSI using hollow bore needles containing blood
307 86.72 47 13.28 354 7 1.94
D. Parental route of contaminated blood
261 73.94 92 26.06 353 8 2.22
E. Blood from patient with a high virus level
284 80.23 70 19.77 354 7 1.94
F. No Idea 8 2.26 346 97.74 354 7 1.94
Number of People Correct 181 51.27 172 48.73 353 8 2.22
Q6: The risk of transmission of infection depends on type of contact of the contaminated material. The following factors are associated with a higher risk:
![Page 53: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Cont Table II. Knowledge on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
Knowledgeable
(>=15)
Not Knowledgeable
(<15)Total
MD 23 (17.83%) 106 (82.17%) 129
Med tech 2 (33.33%) 4 (66.67%) 6
Nursing 13 (6.05%) 202 (93.95%) 215
Missing 4
Total 38 (10.73%) 312 (88.14%) 354
Mean Score 10.466SD of Score 3.335
![Page 54: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Table III. Attitude on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers (N=354)
Questions on Attitude
Likert Scale Frequencies
Total
Positive Missing
SD D N A SA Freq % Freq %
Question 1: Safety Training on needle stick injury is part of staff development orientation and programs
13 0 13 70 255 351 325 92.59 10 2.77
Question 2: All needle stick injuries should be reported.
13 1 9 75 254 352 329 93.47 9 2.49
Question 3: I will report my injury because I need to undergo work-up for the following to determine if I should receive post-exposure prophylaxis.
A. Hepatitis B Virus 12 0 10 68 261 351 329 93.73 10 2.77
B. Hepatitis C Virus 13 0 12 73 254 352 327 92.90 9 2.49
C. HIV 13 0 5 55 279 352 334 94.89 9 2.49
![Page 55: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Cont. Table III. Attitude on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
Questions on AttitudeLikert Scale Frequencies
Total
Positive MissingSD D N A SA Freq % Freq %
Question 4: I will report my injury because I know that the source of blood was from a confirmed or suspected with the following
A. Hepatitis B Virus 13 0 13 46 277 349 323 92.55 12 3.32
B. Hepatitis C Virus 13 1 14 55 268 351 323 92.02 10 2.77
C. HIV 13 0 9 46 282 350 328 93.71 11 3.05
Question 5: I will report my injury because I am afraid that I will be infected with the following:
A. Hepatitis B Virus 12 0 8 47 282 349 329 94.27 12 3.32
B. Hepatitis C Virus 13 1 17 47 273 351 320 91.17 10 2.77
C. HIV 15 0 10 35 291 351 326 92.88 10 2.77
![Page 56: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Cont. Table III. Attitude on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=354)
Questions on Attitude
Likert Scale Frequencies
Total
Positive MissingSD D N A SA Freq % Freq %
Question 6: I will report my injury because I am not sure if the needle stick injury was high risk for transmission of the following:
A. Hepatitis B Virus 12 3 13 65 255 348 320 91.95 13 3.60
B. Hepatitis C Virus 12 4 21 70 241 348 311 89.37 13 3.60
C. HIV 11 3 7 64 263 348 327 93.97 13 3.60
Question 7: I will report my injury because I had no previous vaccination against Hepatitis B Virus
28 23 53 59 185 348 244 70.11 13 3.60
Question 8: I will report my injury because I know the reporting procedure
23 14 50 90 173 350 263 75.14 11 3.05
Question 9: I will report my injury because I will not be blamed or get in trouble for having the exposure.
21 19 66 78 166 350 244 69.71 11 3.05
![Page 57: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Table IV. Practices on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers (N=98)
A. I will report needle stick injury to:Yes No Total Missing
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
1. Supervisor 233 65.82 121 34.18 354 7 1.94
2. Emergency Room Physician 80 22.60 274 77.40 354 7 1.94
3. Out-patient Department Physician 42 11.86 312 88.14 354 7 1.94
4. Infection Control Committee Head/Staff 301 85.03 53 14.97 354 7 1.94
5. None 0 0.00 361 100.00 361 0 0.00
6. Others 14
a. Charge Nurse 2
b. Senior Nurse 2
c. Head Nurse 2
d. Senior ROD 1
e. Senior/Charge Nurse 4
f. Did not Specify 3
![Page 58: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Cont. Table IV. Practices on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=98)
B. I will ask for post-exposure
prophylaxis:
Yes No Total Missing
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
1. within 24 hours 299 84.46 55 15.54 354 7 1.94
2. 2-3 days 49 13.84 305 86.16 354 7 1.94
3. 4-7 days 16 4.52 338 95.48 354 7 1.94
4. Later Than 7 day 17 4.80 337 95.20 354 7 1.94
5. None 1 0.28 353 99.72 354 7 1.94
6. Others (did not specify) 1 0.28 353 99.72 354 7 1.94
![Page 59: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Cont. Table IV. Practices on transmissions and post exposure prophylaxis among health care workers
(N=98)
C. How do I dispose of used needles and
sharps
Yes No Total Missing
Freq % Freq % Freq Freq %
1. Place used sharps on puncture-
resistant containers335 94.63 19 5.37 354 7 1.94
2. Place used needles in the yellow-lined
garbage bins17 4.80 337 95.20 354 7 1.94
3. Place used needles into grabage bins 1 0.28 353 99.72 354 7 1.94
4. Place used needles into the plastic
intravenous fluid bottles22 6.21 332 93.79 354 7 1.94
5. Wrap used sharps in a paper 6 1.70 346 98.30 352 9 2.49
![Page 60: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Bibliography
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. (2001, June 29). Retrieved October - November 2011, from Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011, May). Retrieved October - November 2011, from Surveillance of Occupationally Acquired HIV/AIDS in Healthcare Personnel, as of December 2010: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/organisms/hiv/Surveillance-Occupationally-Acquired-HIV-AIDS.html
3. Alam, M. (2002). Knowledge, Attitude and Practices among Health Care Workers on Needle-Stick Injuries. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 22, 396-399.
4. Choi , E. J., Choi, S. H., & Sunwoo, S. (2007, July). Factors Affecting Resident Physician's Underreporting Behavior of Needle Stick Injuries in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital. Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine, 28(7), 500-508.
5. Collins, C. H., & Kennedy, D. A. (1987). Microbiological hazards of occupational needlestick and other sharps’ injuries. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 385-402.
6. Gurubacharya, D. L., Mathura, K. C., & Karki, D. B. (2003, Apr-Jun). Knowledge, attitude and practices among health care workers on needle-stick injuries. Kathmandu Univ Med J, 1(2), 91-94.
7. Habib, F., Khan, D. K., Abbas, S., Bhatti, F., & Zafar, A. (2011, May). Knowledge and beliefs among health care workers regarding hepatitis B infection and needle stick injuries at a tertiary care hospital, karachi. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 21(5), 317-318.
8. Kunkel, Dennis. (2003). Exposure to Blood: What Healthcare Personnel Need to Know. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
9. Muralidhar, S., Singh, P., Jain, R., Malhotra, M., & Bala, M. (2010, March). Needle stick injuries among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital of India. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 405-410.
![Page 61: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Bibliography
10. Okaro, A. O., Eze, C. U., & Ohagwu, C. C. (2010). Awareness, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Blood and Body Fluid Precautions among Radiographers in Enugu, Nigeria. African Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 2(1-2), 11-17.
11. Panililio, A. L., Orelien, J. G., Srivastava, P. U., Jagger, J., Cohn, R. D., & Carco, D. M. (2004). Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries among hospital-based healthcare workers in the United States, 1997-1998. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25(7), 556-62.
12. Pike, A. M. (1976). Laboratory-associated infections: summary and analysis of 3921 cases. Health Laboratory Science, 105-14.
13. Rampal, L., Zakaria, R., Sook, L., & Zain, A. (2010). Needle Stick and Sharps Injuries and Factors Associated Among Health Care Workers in a Malaysian Hospital. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 354-362.
14. Saleem, T., Khalid, U., Ishaque, S., & Zafar, A. (2010, February). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical students. Journal of Pak Med Assoc, 60, 151-156.
15. Shah, R., Mehta, H., Fancy, M., Nayak, S., & Donga, B. N. (2010). Knowledge, Attitude and Practices regarding Needle Stick Injury among Health Care Workers in Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahmed Abad, Gujarat. National Journal of Community Medicine, 1(2), 93-96.
16. Siddique, K., Mirza, S., Tauqir, S., Anwar, I., & Malik, A. (2008). Knowledge, Attitude and Practices regarding Needle Stic Injuries Amongst Heallthcare Providers. Pakistan Journal of Surgery, 24(4), 243 - 248.
17. Tandberg , D., Stewart, K., & Doezema, D. (1991, January). Under-reporting of contaminated needlestick injuries in emergency health care workers. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 22(1), 66-70.
18. United States Department of Labor - Occupational Safety & Health Administration. (n.d.). Retrieved October 2011, from Healthcare Wide Hazards - Needlestick/Sharps Injuries: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/hospital/hazards/sharps/sharps.html
19. Voide, C., Lazor-Blanchet , C., Foguena, A. K., & Cavassini, M. (2009, October 2009). High rate of under-reporting of needlestick injuries (NSI) among physicians performing exposure-prone procedures (EPPs): A hospital anonymous survey. HIV Medicine, 1464-2662.
![Page 62: Healthcare worker needle prick injury](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081422/552d1f5f4a795978658b45e4/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)