heather hooper beam reach – fall 2007 - beamreach/071

21
Call-Type and Behavioral Events of Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in the Salish Sea Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach.org/071 Friday Harbor Laboratories – University of Washington Friday Harbor, WA

Upload: percy

Post on 10-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Associations of Discrete Call-Type and Behavioral Events of Southern Resident Killer Whales ( Orcinus orca ) in the Salish Sea. Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach.org/071 Friday Harbor Laboratories – University of Washington Friday Harbor, WA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Associations of Discrete Call-Type and Behavioral Events of

Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in the

Salish Sea

Heather HooperBeam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach.org/071

Friday Harbor Laboratories – University of Washington

Friday Harbor, WA

Page 2: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Behavioral States(as defined by the National Marine Fishery Services)

Traveling Foraging Resting Playing

1. Object play (kelp, floats) 2. Social interactive play (touching, breaching,

percussive behaviors) 3. Solitary play

Milling

Page 3: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Behavioral Events There’s a difference!

Breach Tailslap Spyhop Change direction Porpoising Peckslap Rolling Inverted tailslap Inverted surface Lunge Kelping Elfshoe

Spyhop & Porpoising

Page 4: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Vocalizations Clicks Whistles Calls

Discrete Aberrant Variable

While there is no conclusive evidence as to the meaning of specific vocalizations, the social complexity and unity of any one pod or community of killer whales suggests that they must have a communication system that allows them to maintain group cohesion through time and space

Page 5: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Discrete Call RepertoiresDiscrete calls are most often used during times of group dispersion:

95.2% of all calls during foraging, and94% of all calls during traveling in the northern residents (Ford 1989).

This indicates that discrete calls are used as a way to maintain contact between pod members and/or maintain spatial organization (Ford and Fisher 1983, Ford 1989, Riesch et al. 2006).

Ford (1989) proposed that the repertoires of killer whale calls have evolved in order to “increase the reliability and efficiency of intrapod communication.”

Page 6: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Problem Statement The objective of my study is to identify the vocalizations coming

from a specific killer whale and relate that directly to the behavior that particular animal is expressing at the same time. This kind of detailed analysis could be very useful in recognizing the patterns that indicate the function or meaning of discrete calls.

A greater understanding of the communication system of killer whales could give us a better understanding of their customs, health and mental states as individuals or in the whole community. This information would be critical to the protection of the species.

Lime Kiln lighthouse

Page 7: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Methods

Southern resident killer whales – J, K, and L pods observation period spanned from September 6, 2007 to

October 20, 2007 study area was the waters surrounding the San Juan

Islands, WA, USA. observational platform was a 42-foot catamaran, the Gato

Verde, with a quiet, hybrid, diesel engine

Page 8: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Methods Continued Hydrophone array 2 solid state recorders Protractor Rangefinder A watch

Page 9: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Call-Type Identification Calls were identified

by visual comparison to Ford’s call catalogue (1987)

Acoustically compared to CallTutor (Val Veirs)

Oct 6, 2007 – S42 & S44 calls

Page 10: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Data Collection

Page 11: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Analysis

Calltutor (Val Veirs) Audacity 1.2.4 Ishmael 1.0 (David Mellenger) Ford’s Call Catalogue (1987) Excel (Microsoft)

Chi-square test Null hypothesis = random distribution of discrete

calls among all behavioral events

Page 12: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Results While my original goal was to localize the calls from

individual animals, the grouping behavior of the whales observed during my field time and the large amount of error in my measurements made that unfeasible

Localization by Ishmael was able to distinguish calls given by the group of animals where the behavioral events were observed within my acceptable range of error

Page 13: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Results

Table 1. The chi-square values for all behavioral events and associated localized calls during the observation period. Significant individual values (>3.841, p=0.05, df=1) are in bold. Total chi-square value=352.2, df=308, p=0.0419.

Page 14: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Results

The chi-square values of behavioral events and associated localized calls occurring greater than ten times during the observation period. Significant individual values (>3.841, critical p=0.05, df=1) are in bold. Total chi-square value=96.2, df=36, p=2.159e-7.

Page 15: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Change Direction

Change Direction

S116%

S35%

S716%

S1627%

S175%

S195%

S315%

S3316%

S415%

S16 = 27% of callsChi-square value = 11.677

>>than critical value of 3.841

S16

Page 16: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Porpoising

S19 ~ S31 when porpoising Calls look alike, short (~0.5s), contour rises up at end 55% of calls

S19

Chi-square = 8.642

S31

Chi-square = 7.236

PorpoisingS1010%

S125%

S1410%

S1710%

S1925%

S225%

S3130%

S335%

Page 17: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Peckslaps Peckslaps – S10, S12, S31

All look and sound very different Compromised 75% of calls

PeckslapS66%

S1019%

S1219%

S3137%

S3613%

S446%

S10

Chi-square = 5.456

S12

Chi-square = 4.251

S31

Chi-square = 12.422

Page 18: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

S31 was absent from breach periods Communication is distinctly different from porpoising and peckslaps Chi-square value = 6.303

S37 = breach 2 part call, ~1s, different contour, ending in a steady freq,

compromised 15% of calls Chi-square value = 3.555

Breaches

S37

Breach

S113%

S213%

S133%S16

8%

S1712%

S195%

S225%

S3715%

S412%

S428%

S442%

S123%

S102%

S82%

S72%

S52%

S42%

S32%

Page 19: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Tailslaps There were no calls used in the context of

tailslaps that were statistically significant This is a statistically random distribution - all

individual chi-square values <3.841 critical value

Tailslap

S122%

S28%

S48%

S108%S12

15%

S168%

S1715%

S378%

S428%

Page 20: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Further Research Larger sample size Improve localization techniques Discrete call variation within each call-type Underwater behavioral data Playback studies?

Page 21: Heather Hooper Beam Reach – Fall 2007 - beamreach/071

Acknowledgements

First of all, I would like to thank Jason Wood my advisor for guiding me through the entire ten weeks. Thank-you to our captain, Mike Kramer for teaching me to sail and guiding us amongst the whales. Shannon Fowler was essential for her guidance and encouragement while aboard the Gato Verde. My peers for their support, advice, humor, and hard work throughout the quarter. There are so many people who helped me in this process, I cannot name them all. To everyone that I came in contact with during this program, your guidance, support and inspiration were invaluable to me. I would also like to thank my parents for their love and support, without which I would never have been able to have gotten this far in my education.