heavy vehicle access - city of shoalhaven

34
Heavy Vehicle Access NHVR Local Government Forum - Nowra Brett Graham, Senior Officer Network Development, RMS Peter Bache, Heavy Vehicle Access Coordinator, RMS Dony Castro, Bridge Maintenance Planner, RMS

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jan-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Heavy Vehicle AccessNHVR Local Government Forum - Nowra

Brett Graham, Senior Officer Network Development, RMSPeter Bache, Heavy Vehicle Access Coordinator, RMS

Dony Castro, Bridge Maintenance Planner, RMS

2

The National FrameworkThe NHVR is the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator

Productivity Safety Efficiency

Legislation/Policy Roles

Roads Act 1993

Road Transport Act 2013

Heavy Vehicle National Law

Associated Acts and Regulations

TfNSW Strategic policy & planning

RMS Network Manager & Road Manager

Councils Service Provider

NHVR Regulator

Balancing objectives

Road Safety

Asset Sustainability

Economic Productivity

3

Effective Regulator, Road Manager and

Operator

Objective: Improve Road Safety

4

Fatalities from heavy truck crashes - NSW vs Rest of Australia 2004-2015, 12 months ending March 2016

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mar‐16

Numbe

r of Fatalities in

 Australia

Numbe

r of Fatalities in

 NSW

Year

NSW

Rest of Australia

Linear (NSW)

Linear (Rest of Australia)

Objective: Economic Productivity

5

Improving productivity with a growing freight taskCurrent & forecast freight task on key corridors Commodity movement volume growth

Objective: Asset Sustainability

6

NSW has a significant number of pre-1976 bridges

Permits

NoticesNational & NSW

General Access

Managing access to the network

7

The majority of vehicles travel without restriction

2016: Ag Cotton Vehicle, Bus Mass Limit, SPECT Authorisation,

GHMS Mass, HV Standards (Class 1 SPV), SPV Notice

Amendment, Immediate Suspension (Newell Highway)

2016: Special Purpose Vehicles, Load Carrying Vehicles

(Dimension and Mass), PBS Level 1 & 2a Truck and Dog

Trailer (Authorisation and Combination Mass), Bus Mass, HV Spreader Box Dimension

Managing access to the network

8

A road manager has a number of possible responses to a request for consent:

•Consent•Consent with conditions•Propose an alternative route •Reject with justification

Road manager consideration•Infrastructure protection•Public amenity•Public safety•Strategic networks (freight routes)

Road Manager Access Decisions

Managing access to the network

9

Road Manager Access Decisions

•Type of vehicle•New or existing freight task•Frequency of movement/number of movements•Operating times•Existing vehicles•Previous approvals •Productivity benefits•Infrastructure impacts•Local issues•Interaction with other road managers•Jurisdictional approvals/practices

Things to consider

Managing access to the network

10

Interactive Maps

Challenge: Diversity of fleet

11

Vehicle Combination Length Mass

Rigid 12.5GML: 26.5CML: 27.5

Semi-trailer 19.0GML: 42.5CML: 43.5HML: 45.5

B-double 26.0GML: 62.5CML: 64.5HML: 68.0

Type 1 A-double road train 36.5GML: 79.5CML: 81.5HML: 85.0

Type 2 A-triple road train 53.5GML: 115.5CML: 117.5

Recognising different vehicle standards and features

PBS Access

12

There are four PBS performance standards which correspond to prescriptive heavy vehicle performance

• Axle/ Group Weight• Axle Spacing's• Extreme Axle Spacing

• Worst Case scenario is used in bridge assessment

13

Factors affect Bridge Assessment

Assessment vehicle configurations

14

15

2 @ 45.5t HML Semi Trailers (11m) vs 4 @ 22.5t Rigid Body Trucks (4.5m)

Span Length of 59m

9000kNm

7400kNmMaximum Bending Moment by 4 Rigid Body Trucks

Maximum Bending Moment by 2 HML Semi Trailers

11m

4.5m

16

11m GML Semi Trailer (42.5t) vs 19m GML Semi Trailer (42.5t)

Span Length of 59m

5430kNm

5066kNmMaximum Bending Moment by 19m GML Semi Trailer

Maximum Bending Moment by 11m GML Semi Trailer

17

Max Bending Moment by freight vehicles on short span

187kNm

166kNmMaximum Bending Moment (same for 42.5t Semi Trailer, 62.5t B-Double and 79t A-Double)

Maximum Bending Moment by HML 45.5t Semi Trailer and 68.0t B-Double

11m

18

Max Bending Moment by freight vehicles on medium length span (15m)

835kNm

770kNmGML B-Double

848kNm863kNm916kNm

GML Semi Trailer

GML A-Double HML B-Double

HML Semi Trailer

11m

19

Max Bending Moment by freight vehicles on 50m span

4790kNm4490kNm

GML Semi Trailer

5800kNm6330kNm7066kNm

GML A Double

GML B-Double HML Semi Trailer

HML B Double

11m

Heavy vehicle constraints on the Princes Highway

20

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY, Page 91AUGUST 2016

B00713 Nowra Bridge

21

Shoalhaven River South Bound

Bridge number: B00713Road: Princes Highway (A1)Year Constructed: 1881Total Length: 341mCarriageway width: 5.55mNumber of traffic lane: 2 lane southboundLongest span: 56.1m (Whipple Truss)Shortest span: 15.2m

• Impacted damage• Broken Bolts between Stringers and Deck• Corrosion at Bridge Bearings• Corrosion at End Cross Girder of Truss Spans

Deteriorations

Impacted Damage

23

Broken attachment bolts between stringers and deck.

Corrosion

Shoalhaven River South Bound

Specific challenges – Short TermNowra – The southbound bridge over the Shoalhaven River at Nowra is narrow at only 5.55m wide and only 4.6m high, restricting access for OSOM vehicles, is not suitable for HML access and also has a Poor Bridge Health Index.

Specific Priorities Complete planning and commence construction of a new Shoalhaven River crossing.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016 page 138

25

Currambene Creek North Bound

Specific challenges – Short TermNowra to Jervis Bay Road – The northbound bridge over Currambene Creek is not suitable for 26m B-Double operation at HML. Specific priorities– Short TermInvestigate options to upgrade the northbound bridge over Currambene Creek to be suitable for HML access.Specific - Medium term priorities Construct replacement or upgrade existing bridge on the northbound carriageway over CurrambeneCreek to cater for HML B-double access.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016  Page 140 and 151

26

Clyde River Bridge Batemans Bay

Specific challenges – Short TermBatemans Bay – Narrow bridge over the Clyde River (6.09m). Clyde River Bridge is not suitable for HML access. Bridge over Clyde River has a "Poor" Bridge Health Index. Specific priorities– Short TermCommence planning for the renewal or replacement of the bridge over the Clyde River at Batemans Bay.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016 Page 144

27

Wagonga Inlet Bridge Narooma

Specific challenges – Medium termNarooma – The Wagonga Inlet Bridge is very narrow at only 6.09m and has a 4.5m height limit due to the truss design and is not suitable for HML access. Specific - Medium term priorities Develop options for a new bridge over the WagongaInlet balancing anticipated freight and regional travel demand against the cost of infrastructure and improving road safety. Investigations should include a bridge and improved road alignment on the bridge approaches suitable for 26m HML B-Double Access.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016 Page 152

28

Brogo River Bridge

Specific challenges – Medium termBrogo River Bridge is a narrow bridge only 6.09m wide and is a 26m B-Double HML constraint. The southern approach has very poor alignment and is also a constraint for 26m B-Doubles. Specific – Medium term priorities Commence planning to improve the crossing over the Brogo River, including addressing the constraints and road safety hazards on the southern and northern approaches.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016 Page 152

29

Tuross River Bridge

Specific challenges – Long termTuross River Bridge is not suitable for HML access.

Specific – Long term priorities Develop options to replace the Bridge over Tuross River or strengthen the bridge to enable 26m B-Double HML access.

PRINCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY AUGUST 2016 Page 152

30

Reduction in Restricted Bridges for HML vehicles from 2014

31

Network Connectivity Sub-Committee

32

Working to address barriers to connectivity

A partnership between industry, local government, state government and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator.

Network Connectivity

Industry

NSW Gov’t

NHVR

Local Gov’t

Undertaking a Program of Work with actions to:

• Improve road managers capacity and capability to assess consent requests;

• Identify options to address gaps in funding programs;

• Improve administrative arrangements; and

• Target specific constraints.

A safer, more productive network

33

Productivity Outcome

Soc

ieta

l Out

com

e

TOWARDS ZERO

Productivity

Road Toll

Questions

Brett GrahamSenior Officer Network DevelopmentRegional & Freight DivisionFreight [email protected]

8843 3022

Peter BacheHeavy Vehicle Access CoordinatorRegional & Freight DivisionFreight [email protected]

6492 9502