helping individuals living with mental illness sustain tenancies cooperation, coordination,...
DESCRIPTION
Our Key Purpose… To gain a stronger understanding of the specialist support that individuals living with severe and enduring mental illness may require to establish and maintain tenanciesTRANSCRIPT
HELPING INDIVIDUALS LIVING WITH MENTAL ILLNESS
SUSTAIN TENANCIES
Cooperation, Coordination, Collaboration?
Carolyn WilliamsEmily Teding van Berkhout – [email protected]
How did the project come to be? Partners in Recovery (PIR) Consortiums 2014/2015 Accessing and sustaining tenancies key issue raised Supportive Tenancy Service workers raise living
with mental illness as key issue Capital Health Network provides flexible funds to
Woden Community Service and Belconnen Community Service to explore these issues
Mental Illness and Housing Project
Our Key Purpose…
To gain a stronger understanding of the specialist support that individuals living with
severe and enduring mental illness may require to establish and maintain tenancies
The main objectives include
Identify the needs and barriers faced in accessing and maintaining secure tenancies
Identify the resources and capacities that the STS team currently bring
Identify the ways in which the current capacity and skills of STS can be enhanced
To help establish clearer role expectations between PIR and STS workers
How can the NDIS be useful?
Supportive Tenancy Service
Time for an activity!
Discussion
What was the activity like? Did you draw anything recognisable? How did the time pressure feel? Did your expectation of the finished product
change?
Sustaining Tenancy – multiple stakeholders
Who? Service user Landlord or HACT Family Mental health services Financial services Legal services Child and youth services Tenancy Support
Do they all have the same goal?
Lets look at an example
John 44 years old Public housing Two school aged
children Living with severe
depression Referred for property
condition
Involved• John• Housing ACT• Child, youth,
family gateway • Mental Health
(public)• Others?
What are the agendas?
John: To get public housing off his back and live how he wants
HACT: to get the property condition corrected MH: to assist John with improving his mental
health CYF: to help children – does CPS need to be
involved? STS: to help John to keep his tenancy, and make
sure it is sustainable for the future
How would STS collaborate?
Meet with John. What does John actually want? Does he consent to you talking with other services?
Case conference +/- John Shared goals Regular communication Flexibility
The Challenges
Engaging the service user STS is voluntary, but can feel mandatory Agency policies on closing files due to non-engagement
Conflicting agendas and timeframes We want to work at John’s pace if possible
Trust between services Communication barriers e.g. Consent Roles and Responsibilities Time
The Continuum of IntegrationAutonomy Cooperation Coordination Collaboration Integration
Agencies act without reference to each other, although the actions of one may affect the other(s).
Agencies establish ongoing ties and provide limited support to an activity undertaken by the other agency. Communication and sharing information is emphasised.
Separate partners plan the alignment of their activities. Duplication of activities and resources is minimised. Requires agreed plans and protocols or the appointment of a coordinator or manager.
Partners put their resources into a pool for a common purpose, but remain separate. Responsibility for using the pooled resources is shared by each of them. Requires: - common goals and philosophy - agreed plans and governance - agreed administrative arrangements.
Links between separate agencies draw them into a single system. Boundaries between the agencies dissolve as they merge some or all of their activities, processes or assets.
Table1. (http://communitydoor.org.au/sites/default/files/A_GUIDE_TO_INTEGRATED_SERVICE_DELIVERY_TO_CLIENTS.pdf)
Strategies to Improve Collaboration
Clear goals and accountability Participation Transparency
Open and honest communication One clear, agreed upon, case plan
Limits multiple agendas Lead by example
Take Home Message
Collaboration is ideal but challenging Requires strong partnerships, commitment,
transparent and mutual goals, and trust Working with different agencies, different levels of
experience with mental illness STS promotes and encourages collaborative
approaches
The Project
Have you had experience with the interactions between severe mental illness and housing problems?
What do you think the key barriers people living with mental illness face in regards to tenancies?
What, if any, are the particular needs of people living with mental illness in regards to housing?
Do you have anything to contribute?
IF YOU HAVE ANY FEEDBACK, SUGGESTIONS, OR IDEAS TO INFORM OUR PROJECT PLEASE CONTACT US:[email protected]
Carolyn WilliamsEmily Teding van Berkhout – [email protected]