hep projects · 2018. 8. 22. · hep project portfolio the 2014 p5 report is the major guidance...

HEP ProjectsMike Procario

Director of Facilities Division

Office of High Energy Physics

HEP PI Meeting August 22, 2018

HEP Project Portfolio

The 2014 P5 report is the major guidance

that HEP used to develop its current project

portfolio.

Large projects greater than $50 million were

named.

Small projects were encouraged.

FACET II was added due to the priorities of

the Office of Science.

2August 22, 2018 HEP PI Meeting

P5 Recommended Projects

Complete existing projects.

CMS Phase 1 Upgrade

ATLAS Phase 1 Upgrade

Muon g-2

Muon to Electron Conversion

LSST

A broader generation 2 dark matter portfolio

HEP has implemented our direct detection of dark

matter with

ADMX

SuperCDMS

LZ

August 22, 2018 HEP PI Meeting 3


The highest priority was given to High

Luminosity LHC

HL-LHC Accelerator Upgrade Project

HL-LHC ATLAS Upgrade Project

HL-LHC CMS Upgrade Project

DESI was recommended as the next dark

energy experiment.

Dark Matter G3 was recommended.

HEP has prioritized completing DM G2 over starting

DM G3



Build a truly international LBNF/DUNE Recommended to be more capable than the CD-1 concept that already existed.

Invite international contributions to the facility.

Make the detectors truly international.

Upgrade the beam power at Fermilab with PIP-II.

Build a suite of small experiments.

Carry out a short baseline neutrino program.

Participate in CMB experiments in ways that utilize HEP strengths.


DOE Project Management


Projects with TPC < $5 million don’t fall under O413.3• Small projects are managed by the HEP Research DivisionDOE has just delegated oversight of project with TPC < $50 million to the labs. • Of current projects this applies to SuperCDMS and FACET II

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Jan-0

6

May-0

6

Sep-0

6

Jan-0

7

May-0

7

Sep-0

7

Jan-0

8

May-0

8

Sep-0

8

Jan-0

9

May-0

9

Sep-0

9

Jan-1

0

May-1

0

Sep-1

0

Jan-1

1

May-1

1

Sep-1

1

Jan-1

2

May-1

2

Sep-1

2

Jan-1

3

May-1

3

Sep-1

3

Jan-1

4

May-1

4

Sep-1

4

Jan-1

5

May-1

5

Sep-1

5

Jan-1

6

May-1

6

Sep-1

6

Jan-1

7

May-1

7

Sep-1

7

Jan-1

8

May-1

8

Number of active projects per month

Number of HEP O413.3 Projects


P5 report issued

Tevatron and B factory running flat out

HEP Project Funding


-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

HEP Project Funding$K

Major Items of Equipment (TPC) Line Item Construction (TPC) Total Project Funding

Mu2e, PIP II, LBNF/DUNE

All other

HEP Project Staff

Michael Procario, Director of HEP Facility Operations

Ted Lavine, Program Manager for Instrumentation FACET-II, LZ, Muon g-2, Mu2e, helping with PIP-II and LBNF/DUNE

Simona Rolli, Program Manager for Instrumentation LHC ATLAS Phase I, LHC CMS Phase I, SuperCDMS, HL-LHC projects

Kathy Turner, Program Manager for Cosmic Frontier* DESI

Helmut Marsiske, Program Manager for Detector R&D* LSST

Bill Wisniewski, half-time detailee from SLAC LBNF/DUNE

Mike Harrison, half-time detailee from BNL PIP-II

*Matrixed from HEP Research and Technology R&D Division


Current Project Portfolio >CD-3


Project Laboratory Type TPC($M)

Next Step Actual or Forecast

Manager

Muon g-2 Fermilab MIE 44 Completed January 2018 Lavine

LSST SLAC MIE 168 CD-4 March 2022 Marsiske

Mu2e Fermilab LIC 274 CD-4 December2022

Lavine

ATLAS Phase I Upgrade

BNL MIE 33 CD-4 September 2019

Rolli

CMS Phase I Upgrade

Fermilab MIE 33 CD-4B July 2019 Rolli

DESI LBNL MIE 56 CD-4 Q4 FY 2021 Turner

LZ LBNL MIE 56 CD-4 Q2 FY 2022 Lavine

FACET-II SLAC MIE 24.6 CD-4 September 2021

Lavine

SuperCDMS-SNOlab

SLAC MIE 18.6 CD-4 September 2021

Rolli

Current Project Portfolio < CD-3


Project Laboratory Type TPC($M)

Next Step Forecast Manager

HL LHC AUP Fermilab MIE 208 -252

CD-2 Q1 FY 2019 Rolli

HL LHC ATLAS BNL MIE 149-181

CD-2 Q3 FY 2019 Rolli

PIP II Fermilab LIC 653-928

CD-2 Q3 FY 2020 Procario/Harrison

LBNF/DUNE Fermilab LIC 1,260-1,860

CD-2 Q1 FY 2021 Procario/Wisniewski

HL LHC CMS Fermilab MIE CD-1 ? Rolli

Several projects are below the thresholds for DOE project management order. South Pole Telescope 3G fabrication was completed in Jan 2017. ADMX-G2 fabrication was completed in Feb 2017. Short Baseline Near Detector is still under construction. PROSPECT and ANNIE are small neutrino experiments supported under a special FOA.

HEP Budgets and Project

The Administration and the Congress have been

out of sync on budgets the last two years.

FACET II and SuperCDMS were ready for CD-2 much

earlier than they were approved.

DOE needed to know that the funds to support them would be

available so we had to wait for the appropriations to pass.

FACET II was also de-scoped to fit the budget.

HEP will look to follow up with upgrades to achieve all of the planned

capability.

Other projects like LBNF/DUNE, DESI, SuperCDMS, HL-

LHC projects saw additional funds provided by

Congress.


Request versus Enacted

FY 18 PB Request FY 18 EnactedEnacted vs

Request

DESI 5,700 20,000 +14,300

FACET-II 2,000 10,000 +8,000

HL-LHC Accelerator 27,000 27,000 ---

HL-LHC ATLAS 6,000 12,000 +6,000

HL-LHC CMS 6,000 12,000 +6,000

LSSTcam 9,800 9,800 ---

LZ 14,100 14,100 ---

SuperCDMS-SL 2,000 7,400 +5,400

LBNF/DUNE 55,000 96,000 +41,000

Mu2e 44,400 44,400 ---

PIP-II 14,000 24,100 +10,100


Current Status

All projects past CD-

3 are well on their

way to successful

completion.

They should start

coming on line next

year.


DESI

Mu2e

LSST

SuperCDMS

HL-LHC AUP and HL-LHC ATLAS had

successful CD-1 reviews and are moving on

to CD-2.

HL-LHC CMS needs to improve the planning

of their MIP Timing Detector and there will

another review before CD-1 is approved.


Current Status continued

LBNF/DUNE is busy refurbishing the infrastructure at SURF, so that the excavation can begin.

ProtoDUNE single phase is about to start its run at CERN.

Design work continues across the entire project.


ProtoDUNE APA ready to be installed.

PIP II just received CD-1 on July 23, 2018.


A prototype of a single spoke resonator

What’s Next?

CMB-S4 was recommended by P5. DOE HEP and NSF AST, NSF PHY, and NSF polar programs sponsored a AAAC concept definition task force to make recommendations on how to pursue this project.

On the DOE side the labs are coordinating some critical R&D and a Pre-Project Design Group (PPDG) chaired by Jim Yeck.

PPDG and the collaboration are coordinating closely.

DOE and NSF coordinating.


What’s Next?

Light dark matter is a big topic of discussion

these days.

HEP has started a DM-New Initiatives BRN

Study (2018-2019) to

Assess the science landscape for dark matter

particle searches, AND

Identify which high impact science areas would be

suitable to be pursued with small projects in the

HEP program (i.e. that need HEP infrastructure and

capabilities).


University Roles

University groups are expected to take on

appropriate roles for HEP projects.

There is not enough expertise in the lab system

to tackle all of our projects with universities.

UCSB is known for their work on silicon detectors.

Penn is known for electronics.

Minnesota is know for organizing undergrad students to

produce large numbers of detectors.

Faculty, postdocs, and grad students are supported

under research funding.

Engineers and techs are paid by the project.


Examples of University Project Work

August 22, 2018 HEP PI Meeting 2121Front Back

Array assembly at Brown

Brown University is leading the phototube procurement, testing and assembly of phototube arrays for LZ.

Some universities on Mu2e


Cosmic Ray Veto Mechanical Prototype with University of Virginia faculty, postdocs, technicians, and students who assembled it

Minnesota students assembling a Mu2e tracker panel.

University work on DESI


The fiber positioner team at Michigan

They built 5000 of these for the DESI focal plane.

OSU Professor Klaus Honscheid

Commissioning instrument from OSU

University Roles

Decisions on what scope to assign to a

university group is left to the project

director.

The project director consults with the collaboration

on who can best carry out the scope, but the

project director is accountable for delivering the

project on time and within budget.

Being an excellent scientist does not imply that you

are an excellent project manager.

People who are excellent at both do exist.


hep projects · 2018. 8. 22. · hep project portfolio the 2014 p5 report is the major guidance...

Documents