herbs - h ydro e lectric r eservoir b idding s ystem
DESCRIPTION
HERBS - H ydro E lectric R eservoir B idding S ystem. Faisal Wahid Andy Philpott Anthony Downward. 2011 - Graduated in operations r esearch at Engineering Science, University of Auckland Final year project: Investigating the operational effects of Tekapo A and B asset transfer - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
HERBS - HYDRO ELECTRIC RESERVOIR BIDDING
SYSTEMFaisal WahidAndy Philpott
Anthony Downward
2011 - Graduated in operations research at Engineering Science, University of Auckland Final year project: Investigating the operational effects of
Tekapo A and B asset transfer
2012 - Worked as Trading Analyst for Mighty River Power
Currently pursuing a PhD with Gaspard Monge Program for optimisation and operations research (PGMO) , Meridian Energy and EDF
River Optimisation: short term hydro scheduling under uncertainty
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Professor Andy Philpott – EPOC Dr. Anthony Downward – EPOC Andrew Kerr – Meridian Dr. Anes Dallagi – EDF Professor Frederic Bonnans - INRIA
FRENCH BALANCING MARKET
HYDRO-BIDDING
?Price
Quantity
HYDRO BIDDING PROBLEM
Producing optimal supply/offer curves for hydropower producers
Integrates hydropower production and market exchange
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
HERBS formulation (single reservoir)Simple exampleChallengesOpportunitiesDiscussion
FORMULATION – SINGLE STAGE Market price modelled by discrete states Market clearing price is a random variable Each state has a price interval
Price States = Each price intervals has an average price
Each average price has associated probability
Quantity variables for each price state
FORMULATION – SINGLE STAGE
𝒑𝟏
𝒑𝟐
𝒑𝟑
𝝅𝟑
𝝅𝟐
𝝅𝟏
𝒒𝟏 𝒒𝟐 𝒒𝟑≤ ≤
Max Price($/MW)
Quantity (MW’s)
FORMULATION – SINGLE STAGE
Maximising expected profit Max
Conservation of reservoir storage
Storage bounds
Monotonic offers
FORMULATION – TWO STAGE
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
Stage 1 Stage 2Stage 0
𝒙𝟎 𝑸𝟏(𝝅)
𝑸𝟐(𝝅)𝒙𝟏𝟏=𝒙𝟎−𝒒𝟏
𝟏
𝒙𝟐𝟏=𝒙𝟎−𝒒𝟐
𝟏
𝒙𝟑𝟏=𝒙𝟎−𝒒𝟑
𝟏𝒙𝟑𝟐=𝒙𝟑
𝟏−𝒒𝟑𝟐
𝒙𝟐𝟐=𝒙𝟐
𝟏−𝒒𝟐𝟐
𝒙𝟏𝟐=𝒙𝟏
𝟏−𝒒𝟏𝟐
EXAMPLE #1
Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2
0
30707070
70303030
70303030
State (i) Probability Cumulative Probability
1 $ 70.00 0.2 0.2
2 $ 100.00 0.6 0.8
3 $ 130.00 0.2 1
𝝅=$𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝒙𝟎=𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝒒=𝟕𝟎
COMPARISON WITH EVP
Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2
0
30707070
70303030
70303030
Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2
0
50505050
50505050
50505050
Max Max
EVP HERBS
EXAMPLE #2
Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2
0
30707070
30707070
70303030
State (i) Probability Cumulative Probability
1 $ 70.00 0.2 0.2
2 $ 80.00 0.6 0.8
3 $ 130.00 0.2 1
𝝅=$𝟖𝟖
𝒙𝟎=𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝒒=𝟕𝟎
CHALLENGES
Curse of dimensionalitySimulating stochastic pricesImplementing large river chainsSolution integrity
OPPORTUNITIES
Effects of gate closuresUnintuitive offer strategies Outer approximation (i.e. SDDP,
DOASA)Stochastic dynamic programming
Thank YouQuestions?