hierarchical distributed genetic algorithm for image segmentation

32
Hierarchical Distr ibuted Genetic Alg orithm for Image S egmentation Hanchuan Peng, Fuhui Long*, Zheru Chi, and Wanshi Siu Email: {fhlong, phc, enzheru}@eie.polyu.edu.hk Center for Multimedia Signal Processing, Department of Electronic & Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Upload: eileen

Post on 19-Mar-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation. Hanchuan Peng, Fuhui Long*, Zheru Chi, and Wanshi Siu. Email: {fhlong, phc, enzheru}@eie.polyu.edu.hk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image SegmentationHanchuan Peng, Fuhui Long*, Zheru Chi, and

Wanshi Siu

Email: {fhlong, phc, enzheru}@eie.polyu.edu.hk

Center for Multimedia Signal Processing, Department of Electronic & Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Page 2: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

AbstractA new Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm (HDGA)

is proposed for image segmentation. Histogram dichotomy: to explore the statistical property of input

image and produce a hierarchically quantized image. HDGA is imposed on the quantized image to explore the spatial

connectivity and produce final segmentation result.

HDGA is a major improvement of the original Distributed Genetic Algorithm (DGA) and Multiscale Distributed Genetic Algorithm (MDGA): A priori assumption Chromosome structure Fitness function Genetic operations

Our experiments prove the advantages of HDGA.

Page 3: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

OutlineIntroductionDetails of HDGAExperimental ResultsDiscussion & Conclusion

Page 4: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: Paradigms for Image Segmentation

A lot of existing algorithms for image segmentation. Gray-level thresholding of local/global/deterministic/fuzzy/stochastic schemes Iterative pixel classification (including deterministic and stochastic relaxation) Parameter space clustering (including probabilistic and fuzzy clustering) Surface fitting, surface classification and surface/region growing Edge detection Statistical models (including Markov Random Field (MRF), Gibbs random field,

etc) Neural networks Genetic Algorithm (GA)

Page 5: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: Genetic Algorithms for Image Segmentation

Haseyama’s GA: Minimizing an MSE function for segmentationBhanu’s GA: Hybrid model and parameter optimization Bhandarkar’s GA: Region adjacency graph generation & cost function minimizationKim’s hybrid model of GA & MRFHorita’s GA: Region segmentation of K-mean clustering Scheunders’s genetic Lloyd-Max Quantizer (LMQ)Andrey’s "distributed" GA based on classifier systemLong’s multilevel distributed genetic algorithm……

Page 6: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: Genetic Approaches for Image Segmentation

Use GA as an alternative optimization method of traditional image segmentation techniques. Use GA to remove the sensitivity of the present image segmentation techniques to the initial conditions.

• Use GA in a more novel and promising way, which codes the segmentation process model itself, instead of the model parameters.

Based on existing segmentation techniques

New approach!

Page 7: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: DGA (Distributed Genetic Algorithm)

DGA is novel because it is not based on existing segmentation techniques distributed GA classifier system

“Distributed”: the genetic operations, i.e. selection, crossover, mutation, are performed on locally distributed subgroups of chromosomes, but not globally on all chromosomes in the whole population.Classifier system: a set of symbolic production rules. A classifier is a condition/action rule. It exchanges message with environment through detectors and effectors.

Page 8: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: DGA – ParadigmImage segmentation: a function that takes an image as input and a labeled image as output. The function is represented by classifier system, which consists of a set of spatially organized binary-coded production rules imposed on each pixel. By iteratively modifying the production rules using a distributed genetic algorithm, the rule set encoding the possibly best segmentation can be obtained.

Page 9: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Introduction: DGA – Main Problems

predefine region numbers on the feature histogramunreasonable initialization scheme of chromosome population redundant and inefficient condition-action chromosome structure

Page 10: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: HDGA – A Major Improvement of DGA

a new unsupervised image segmentation method based on:hierarchical adaptive thresholding (HAT) distributed GA

Page 11: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: Paradigm of HDGA

Page 12: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: Role of HAT

HAT explores the statistical property of the input imageprovide a reasonable initialization for GA

operationsprogressive segmentation

Page 13: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: Role of Distributed GA

Distributed genetic algorithm explores the spatial connectivity New chromosome structure New fitness functionNew genetic operations

Page 14: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: Main Advantages of Our Model

It outperforms Andrey's DGA model:adaptively and effectively controls the seg

mentation quality without a priori assumption of the image region number;

produce regions with high homogeneity, high contrast, low noise, and accurate boundaries;

more efficient in both computation and storage.

Page 15: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

The image feature histogram is repeatedly dichotomized into hierarchical continuous intervals until each of the intervals has a pixel-by-pixel MSE less than a given positive threshold TMSE

We can prove: the sum of the pixel variances on all intervals in a higher level is always smaller than that in the lower level --- progressive segmentation

Details of HDGA: Paradigm of HAT

Page 16: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: HAT based Initialization

GA initialization in Andrey’s modelGA initialization in our model

Page 17: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Details of HDGA: Distributed GA-based Segmentation

1. HAT based initialization- DLI2. Evaluation by Fitness Function

)1 ,1(

11

,,,, ,,

,

,

NnMm

bbN

f nqmpnmqp qpnm

nm

nm

3. Genetic Operations 3.1 Selection--- select the cp,q with the largest fitness fp,q in m,n

3.2 Crossover-- produce new offspring

qpnmnew ccc ,, )1(

nmsr sr

qp

nm f

fqpP

,,',

',

,),(

3.3 Mutation – replace cm,n with any chromosome in the whole population randomly according to probability rm

4. Repeat 2, 3 until stop criterion is satisfied

Page 18: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Standard Images in Experiments

Page 19: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Non-standard Image Samples

Page 20: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Level 1 Level 2

Level 3 Level 4

Progressive Segmentation on Different Levels for "bird"

Page 21: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Segmentation: HDGA vs DGAfor “bird”

HDGA DGA

Page 22: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

 

Segmentation: HDGA vs DGAfor “lena”

HDGA DGA

Page 23: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

HDGA DGA

Segmentation: HDGA vs DGAfor “peppers”

Page 24: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Quantitative Evaluation• Region Homogeneity – H• Region Contrast – C• Region boundary accuracy – rA

• Number of regions – NR

• Speed– convergence speed – computational complexity

• Storage complexity

Note: For 1,2,3, the larger the better; For 4,5,6, the smaller the better.

Page 25: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Region Contrastji

jiijC

||

ji ijR

CN

C,2

1where

Region Homogeneity

mRp mpm

m gA

22 )(1

mRp pm

m gA1

21 mmH

RN

m mR

HN

H1

1where

Region Boundary Accuracy)(number pixel

)(number pixelB

EBrA

Page 26: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Region homogeneity (106) in HDGA vs DGA

Page 27: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Region Contrast of HDGA vs DGA

Page 28: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Region Boundary Accuracies of HDGA vs DGA

Page 29: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Segmentation Region Numbers of HDGA vs DGA

Page 30: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Average Convergence Speeds of HDGA vs DGA

Page 31: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

Computational Speeds of HDGA vs DGA

Page 32: Hierarchical Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Image Segmentation

1. HAT explores the statistical property of the input image• provide a reasonable initialization for GA operations

• progressive segmentation 2. Distributed genetic algorithm explores the spatial connect

ivity • new chromosome structure, fitness function, genetic operations

3. Our new model outperforms Andrey et al's DGA model• adaptively and effectively controls the segmentation quality • without a priori assumption of the image region number; • produce regions with high homogeneity, high contrast, low noise, and accur

ate boundaries; • more efficient in both computation and storage.

Conclusions