high culture vs. subculture two models of how culture is transmitted in the city
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
High culture vs. subculture
Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city
![Page 2: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
![Page 3: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
![Page 4: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
![Page 5: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
![Page 6: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery
![Page 7: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
![Page 8: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
![Page 9: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
![Page 10: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
![Page 11: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
![Page 12: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace
![Page 13: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
![Page 14: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
![Page 15: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
![Page 16: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
![Page 17: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
Fordist mass culture: commodification of popular culture creates a new set of norms and institutions at odds with high culture
![Page 18: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
Fordist mass culture: commodification of popular culture creates a new set of norms and institutions at odds with high culture
Post-Fordist niche culture: commodification of marginality creates crisis of representation and authenticity
![Page 19: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
Fordist mass culture: commodification of popular culture creates a new set of norms and institutions at odds with high culture
Post-Fordist niche culture: commodification of marginality creates crisis of representation and authenticity
How does this model presume a historic city that might no longer exist?
![Page 20: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
Fordist mass culture: commodification of popular culture creates a new set of norms and institutions at odds with high culture
Post-Fordist niche culture: commodification of marginality creates crisis of representation and authenticity
How does this model presume a historic city that might no longer exist?
“Court society” and high-cultural institutions are concentrated in the city
![Page 21: High culture vs. subculture Two models of how culture is transmitted in the city](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032105/56649f575503460f94c7b858/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
High culture Subculture
Urban scale of reference Interurban: integrating the monarchy, nation, empire
Intraurban: wresting space from other groups and neighborhoods
Made possible by Tribute: political allegiance, wealth, trade, and the “best of the best” flow to the city
Urbanization: groups compete for material and symbolic resources, including space
Urban structural context Core-periphery Spatial differentiation: city as “mosaic of little worlds”
Latent function Centralizing and legitimating power via display and inculcation of status codes
Mitigating social disorganization via shared practices, norms & identities
Hierarchical orientation Top-down: “civilization” defined and illustrated
Inverted: “deviance” and marginality normalized
Characteristic setting The palace The enclave
Sustained by Patronage and formal institutions (e.g., music academies)
Everyday life and (when cultural production becomes a career) “critical mass”
How is this model complicated by the culture industries?
Fordist mass culture: commodification of popular culture creates a new set of norms and institutions at odds with high culture
Post-Fordist niche culture: commodification of marginality creates crisis of representation and authenticity
How does this model presume a historic city that might no longer exist?
“Court society” and high-cultural institutions are concentrated in the city
Face-to-face public space: subcultures are reproduced locally, not e.g. through the Internet