high performance tray design dr. leon fan kenning engineering, llc

34
High Performance Tray High Performance Tray Design Design Dr. Leon Fan Dr. Leon Fan Kenning Engineering, LLC

Upload: oliver-morton

Post on 17-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

High Performance Tray High Performance Tray DesignDesign

Dr. Leon FanDr. Leon Fan

Kenning Engineering, LLC

July 2001

Dr. Leon FanDr. Leon Fan

Graduate Chinese Academy of SciencesPost Doctoral Work on Gas/Liquid Two

Phase Flow, University of IllinoisFRI Research EngineerGlitch Inc. Manager, Research DepartmentACS Separations Technology, Technical

DirectorSix Tray Patents & Numerous Publications

July 2001

High Performance TraysHigh Performance Trays

Uniform Gas/Liquid Flow Distribution Intimate Gas/Liquid Contact on the TrayCorrect Liquid Residence Time on the

Tray-Deck and in the Down-Comer

High Capacity + High Separation Efficiency

July 2001

Structured Packing (1)Structured Packing (1)

Advantages– Low Pressure Drop– High Gas Flow Capacity– High Mass Transfer Under Certain Conditions

July 2001

Structured Packing (2)Structured Packing (2)

Disadvantages– Unstable Performance at High Liquid Rates– High Bed Requires Liquid Re-distribution– Cannot be Used in Fouling Systems

Application– Low to Medium Liquid Rate Distillation

July 2001

Isobutane/N-Butane, 300 psiaIsobutane/N-Butane, 300 psia

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

HETP(inch)

Tested by FRI

July 2001

HistoryHistory

Glitch Nye TrayGlitch SuperFrac Tray (Early Version)Nutter MVGKoch MaxFracNorton TritonGlitch SuperFrac Tray (New Version)

Begins in Early 1990

July 2001

Development IncentivesDevelopment Incentives

Production Expansion Without Changing Column Size or Tower Attachments

Improved Product Quality Reduction of Reflux Rate and Energy

ConsumptionImproved Anti-Fouling Characteristics

July 2001

Common CharacteristicsCommon Characteristics

Use of Fixed or Moveable Valves, Instead of Sieve Tray

Use of Modified Down-Comers

July 2001

Gas Liquid Flow PatternGas Liquid Flow Pattern

Sieve Tray

Valve Tray

July 2001

Normal Tray ValveNormal Tray Valve

July 2001

New Mini-Valves, Gas Flow New Mini-Valves, Gas Flow PatternsPatterns

July 2001

Kenning TrayKenning Tray

“Scallop Edged, Miniature-Valves” SEMV’s

– Scalloped Edges Divide Gas Stream to Several Small Streams to Enhance Gas/Liquid Contact

– Small Gas Streams Reduce Pressure Drop– Small Gas Streams Reduce Liquid Entrainment

July 2001

Gas-Liquid Flow Pattern on Gas-Liquid Flow Pattern on Conventional TrayConventional Tray

July 2001

Efficient Mass Transfer

Low Gas Flow

Low Liquid Flow

July 2001

Conventional Bubbling PromoterConventional Bubbling Promoter

Vessel Wall

Downcomer

Gas Flow

Liquid Flow

July 2001

Kenning Bubbling PromoterKenning Bubbling Promoter

July 2001

Triangular Triangular BubblingBubbling Promoters Promoters

Diminish High, Horizontal Liquid Velocity out of Down-comer

Strong Gas Streams Blend Clear Liquid into Froth

Three Dimensional Velocity of all Gas Streams out of Bubbling Promoter

July 2001

Truncated DowncomerTruncated Downcomer

Koch MaxFracTM Tray with Truncated Downcomer

July 2001

Gas-Liquid Flow Pattern on Gas-Liquid Flow Pattern on Kenning TrayKenning Tray

Efficient Mass Transfer

July 2001

Downcomer DesignDowncomer Design

Create Best Initial Liquid Flow DistributionMinimize Down-comer Bottom to Increase

Active AreaMaximize Weir Length and Down-comer

Exit Length

July 2001

Glitch New SuperFrac™ TrayGlitch New SuperFrac™ Tray

Downcomer Design

July 2001

KenningKenning Tray IsometricTray Isometric

July 2001

Kenning TrayKenning Tray

Downcomer Design

July 2001

Kenning Tray Basic ComponentsKenning Tray Basic Components

Miniature ValvesBubbling PromotersDown-Comers

July 2001

Kenning Tray DeckKenning Tray Deck

July 2001

View of Tray View of Tray

July 2001

1-1-Butene Separation SystemButene Separation System

Existing System– Two Consecutive Towers 1.3 m & 1.8 m I.D– 150 Conventional Trays in Each Tower– Existing Trays Japanese Design & Manufacture

Goal– Increase Feed Rate from 3.2 tons/hr to 5 tons/hr– Raise Yield from 89% to more than 90%

July 2001

ResultsResults

Feed Rate Increased to 5 tons/hrYield Raised to 93.6%Total Pressure Drop of the Columns did not

Increase No Tower Attachments ChangedNo Welding on the Vessels

July 2001

Reasons for Capacity GainReasons for Capacity Gain

SEMV’s allow increased gas flow with lower pressure drop.

Downcomer design increases active tray area and improves vapor/liquid flow distribution.

Bubbling Promoter aerates liquid more quickly.

High separation efficiency reduces reflux rate.

July 2001

Modified Arrangement of Side Modified Arrangement of Side Draw Draw

Fig. 10

July 2001

Typical Vapor HornTypical Vapor Horn

Gas Flow In

Gas Flow Out

July 2001

Multi-Stage Vapor DistributorMulti-Stage Vapor Distributor

Gas Flow In

Gas FlowOut

July 2001

View of Multi-Stage Vapor View of Multi-Stage Vapor DistributorDistributor

July 2001

C4 & Solvent Mixing SectionC4 & Solvent Mixing Section

b. After revampa. Before revamp

Fig. 5a Fig. 5b