high-resolution subduction modelling of cenozoic …zulassung.hlrn.de › kurzbeschreibungen ›...

2
High-resolution subduction modelling of Cenozoic Andean Orogeny Investigation controls of the foreland deformation patterns S. Liu, S.V. Sobolev, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften, Universität Potsdam; Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches Geo- ForschungsZentrum GFZ, Sektion Geodynamische Modellierung In Short High-resolution 2-D and 3-D geodynamic models of orogen-foreland system Investigation factors changing the lithospheric strength and further controlling shortening modes and deformation patterns in the foreland Investigation 3-D features of structural deformation changes in Central Andes Understanding the formation of Andean Orogeny during the subduction The Andean Orogeny is the result of the crustal shortening of the upper plate during the Cenozoic Nazca plate subduction beneath South America plate. The second highest plateau Altiplano-Puna Plateau on the earth was formed with a pronounced N-S oriented deformation diversity [1]. In particular, there is a thin-skinned Subandean fold-and-thrust belt in the north Altiplano foreland, whereas the de- formation style changes to the thick-skinned struc- ture in the south Santa Barbara and Sierras Pam- peanas province. Two questions about why the high plateau has developed only in the Central Andes during the Cenozoic time and how the different de- formation patterns in the foreland adjacent to the plateau are formed in Central Andes, remain unclear. The previous 2D numerical studies of the Central Andes [2] demonstrated that the shortening process might be related to the lateral north-to-south vari- ation in the strength of the lithosphere and friction coupling at slab interface. However, the exact nature of the strength reduction was not explored due to the lack of high numerical resolution and 3-D numerical models at that time. In this project, we use a highly scalable paral- lel code LaMEM (Lithosphere and Mantle Evolution Model) [3] to develop high-resolution 2-D and 3-D geodynamic models to understand the evolution of foreland deformation. This code is one of the most advanced geodynamic code and have a nearly per- fect performance in MPI-based parallelisation com- puting on HLRN. We first focus on how factors (i.e., lithospheric and crustal structure, friction coefficient) control on the lithospheric strength and further fore- land deformation through high-resolution 2-D mod- els of the orogen-foreland system. As a second stage, we employ 3-D numerical models to investi- gate 3-D aspects of how the lithospheric strength controls shortening modes and deformation styles in the foreland of Central Andes. Furthermore, we are interested to understand the topography evolu- tion and subduction dynamic during the formation of Andean Orogeny by adding the subduction process of the Nazca Plate to the 3-D model. Model results demonstrate that the difference in crustal thickness between orogen and foreland de- cides the shortening style. Pure shear shortening occurs when the orogenic crust is not thicker than the foreland crust. In the simple shear compression, which is characterized by foreland underthrusting beneath the orogen, the orogenic crust is thicker than that in foreland. If the lithosphere of both oro- gen and foreland are thin and weak, the shortening type returns to the pure shear. Regarding the de- formation pattern, the fully thick-skinned structure is only formed in pure shear compressing models. The initiation of the thin-skinned thrust in the latter three patterns ensues from the simple shear shortening. The factor of weak foreland sediments is required to promote the extent of the thin-skinned deformation zone. When the orogenic strength is about a third of the foreland strength or less, a fully thin-skinned structure is formed in the foreland weak sedimen- tary layer. The strength difference can be resulting from lithospheric thinning or crustal thickening in the orogen, or a strengthened foreland achieved by thickening its lithosphere, or both. We apply our high-resolution 2-D and 3-D models to the natural foreland region of Altiplano-Puna Plateau and repro- duce the foreland deformation patterns successfully (Figure 1). Since this is a subproject of Project StRATEGy (Surface processes, Tectonics and Georesources: The Andean foreland basin of Argentina), the project is tightly coupled with other projects. The new data collected from field studies planned in other projects will be used to better constrain the model input and to make the model results more robust and realistic. In turn, the modelling results will help to better evaluate geological, geomorphic and geophysical aspects of basin evolution in Andes. bbp00009

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: High-resolution subduction modelling of Cenozoic …zulassung.hlrn.de › kurzbeschreibungen › bbp00009.pdftion and subduction dynamic during the formation of Andean Orogeny by adding

High-resolution subduction modelling of Cenozoic AndeanOrogeny

Investigation controls of the foreland deformation patterns

S. Liu, S.V. Sobolev, Institut für Erd- undUmweltwissenschaften, Universität Potsdam;Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches Geo-ForschungsZentrum GFZ, Sektion GeodynamischeModellierung

In Short

• High-resolution 2-D and 3-D geodynamic modelsof orogen-foreland system

• Investigation factors changing the lithosphericstrength and further controlling shortening modesand deformation patterns in the foreland

• Investigation 3-D features of structural deformationchanges in Central Andes

• Understanding the formation of Andean Orogenyduring the subduction

The Andean Orogeny is the result of the crustalshortening of the upper plate during the CenozoicNazca plate subduction beneath South Americaplate. The second highest plateau Altiplano-PunaPlateau on the earth was formed with a pronouncedN-S oriented deformation diversity [1]. In particular,there is a thin-skinned Subandean fold-and-thrustbelt in the north Altiplano foreland, whereas the de-formation style changes to the thick-skinned struc-ture in the south Santa Barbara and Sierras Pam-peanas province. Two questions about why the highplateau has developed only in the Central Andesduring the Cenozoic time and how the different de-formation patterns in the foreland adjacent to theplateau are formed in Central Andes, remain unclear.The previous 2D numerical studies of the CentralAndes [2] demonstrated that the shortening processmight be related to the lateral north-to-south vari-ation in the strength of the lithosphere and frictioncoupling at slab interface. However, the exact natureof the strength reduction was not explored due to thelack of high numerical resolution and 3-D numericalmodels at that time.

In this project, we use a highly scalable paral-lel code LaMEM (Lithosphere and Mantle EvolutionModel) [3] to develop high-resolution 2-D and 3-Dgeodynamic models to understand the evolution offoreland deformation. This code is one of the mostadvanced geodynamic code and have a nearly per-fect performance in MPI-based parallelisation com-puting on HLRN. We first focus on how factors (i.e.,

lithospheric and crustal structure, friction coefficient)control on the lithospheric strength and further fore-land deformation through high-resolution 2-D mod-els of the orogen-foreland system. As a secondstage, we employ 3-D numerical models to investi-gate 3-D aspects of how the lithospheric strengthcontrols shortening modes and deformation stylesin the foreland of Central Andes. Furthermore, weare interested to understand the topography evolu-tion and subduction dynamic during the formation ofAndean Orogeny by adding the subduction processof the Nazca Plate to the 3-D model.

Model results demonstrate that the difference incrustal thickness between orogen and foreland de-cides the shortening style. Pure shear shorteningoccurs when the orogenic crust is not thicker thanthe foreland crust. In the simple shear compression,which is characterized by foreland underthrustingbeneath the orogen, the orogenic crust is thickerthan that in foreland. If the lithosphere of both oro-gen and foreland are thin and weak, the shorteningtype returns to the pure shear. Regarding the de-formation pattern, the fully thick-skinned structure isonly formed in pure shear compressing models. Theinitiation of the thin-skinned thrust in the latter threepatterns ensues from the simple shear shortening.The factor of weak foreland sediments is required topromote the extent of the thin-skinned deformationzone. When the orogenic strength is about a thirdof the foreland strength or less, a fully thin-skinnedstructure is formed in the foreland weak sedimen-tary layer. The strength difference can be resultingfrom lithospheric thinning or crustal thickening inthe orogen, or a strengthened foreland achieved bythickening its lithosphere, or both. We apply ourhigh-resolution 2-D and 3-D models to the naturalforeland region of Altiplano-Puna Plateau and repro-duce the foreland deformation patterns successfully(Figure 1).

Since this is a subproject of Project StRATEGy(Surface processes, Tectonics and Georesources:The Andean foreland basin of Argentina), the projectis tightly coupled with other projects. The new datacollected from field studies planned in other projectswill be used to better constrain the model input and tomake the model results more robust and realistic. Inturn, the modelling results will help to better evaluategeological, geomorphic and geophysical aspects ofbasin evolution in Andes.

bbp00009

Page 2: High-resolution subduction modelling of Cenozoic …zulassung.hlrn.de › kurzbeschreibungen › bbp00009.pdftion and subduction dynamic during the formation of Andean Orogeny by adding

Figure 1: High-resolution models with application to Central Andes. The map is modified from Kay and Coira (2009) [4]. Geologicalstructures of two cross section A-A′ and B-B′ are modified from Kley et al. (1999) [5]. The 2-D and 3-D models reproduce not onlythe same structure in the foreland but also the reverse fault in front of the foreland.

WWW

http://irtg-strategy.de/en/node/17

More Information

[1] Sobolev, S.V., Babeyko, A., 2005. Geology3(8), 621-624. doi:10.1130/G21557AR.1

[2] Babeyko, A., Sobolev, S.V., 2005 Geology3301, 75-94. doi:10.1130/G21126.1

[3] Kaus, B.J.P., Popov, A.A., Baumann, T.S.,Püsök, A.E., Bauville, A., Fernandez, N., Col-lignon, M., 2016. NIC Symposium 2016 - Pro-ceedings 48, 299-307. http://www.geowiss.uni-mainz.de/illustrationen/Geophysics/Kaus_etal_NIC,pdf

[4] Kay, S.M., Coira, B.L., 2009. Geological So-ciety of America Memoir 204, 229-259. doi:10.1130/2009.1204(11)

[5] Kley, J., Monaldi, C.R., Salfity, J.L., 1999.Tectonophysics 33(8), 617-620. doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(98)90223-2

Project Partners

Other projects in IRTG-StRATEGy

Funding

This is the subproject 163-G 3.2 of IRTG-StRATEGyIGK2018 funded by DFG and the federal state ofBrandenburg

bbp00009